Can pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer be avoided? An audit of parenchymal sparing lung surgery

Sleeve Lobectomy Versus Pneumonectomy: Tumor Characteristics and Comparative Analysis of Feasibility and Results

BACKGROUND

Sleeve lobectomy (SL) seems to have better results than pneumonectomy. Some authors propose to extend its indications. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative results, locoregional recurrence, and survival after sleeve lobectomy and pneumonectomy in focusing on right upper lobe cancer.

METHODS

From 1984 to 2002, 973 lung resections were performed for T1, T2, and bronchial T3 right upper lobe non-small cell lung cancer. There were 756 lobectomies (L group), 151 pneumonectomies (RP group), and 66 sleeve lobectomies (SL group). The RP group was further divided with regard to intrapulmonary lymph node involvement. Pneumonectomy 1 (RP1) was a group of N0, intralobar N1, and skip metastasis involvement (N0-N2). Pneumonectomy 2 (RP2) was a group of extralobar N1 and nonskip metastasis involvement (N1-N2). Postoperative results were compared among SL, L, and RP groups. Survival was compared between the two homogeneous groups for oncologic characteristics (SL, RP1).

RESULTS

Statistical comparison of 5-year actuarial survival showed a significant difference favoring SL (SL: 72.5%/ RP1: 53.2%; p = 0.0025). Postoperative mortality was higher after RP (L: 2.9% / SL: 4.5%/ RP: 12.6 %). Significant factors limiting SL were tumor size, extralobar N1, and main bronchus involvement (p = 0.000026, 0.0002, and 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate and long-term survival appears better after sleeve lobectomy than right pneumonectomy for comparable stages of right upper lobe cancer. For frequency to increase by systematic attempt at SL, limited by large tumors and extralobar N1 involvement, the only way should be after favorable response to induction chemotherapy.

Local Control of Disease Related to Lymph Node Involvement in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Sleeve Lobectomy Compared With Pneumonectomy

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence has suggested that sleeve lobectomy might be a viable alternative procedure for pneumonectomy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including patients with adequate pulmonary reserve. This study was designed to compare the outcomes of the two procedures and to determine adequate surgical indications for each procedure.

METHODS

From January of 1989 to December of 1998, sleeve lobectomy was performed in 49 patients, and 200 patients underwent pneumonectomy for NSCLC. By reviewing the computed tomographic scans, bronchoscopic findings, and operative reports, we selected 49 patients on whom sleeve resection could have been performed. The clinical outcomes of the sleeve lobectomies (SL) and pneumonectomies (PN) were analyzed, particularly in relation to nodal status and recurrence patterns.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 6.1% (3 of 49 patients) in the SL group and 4.1% (2 of 49 patients) in the PN group. Mean follow-up period was 51 months (range, 5 to 149). The overall 5-year survival rate was not substantially different between the two groups (SL: 53.7% vs PN: 59.5%, p = 0.510). Recurrence occurred in 57% (26 of 46 patients) of the SL group and in 30% (14 of 47 patients) of the PN group. The 5-year freedom from recurrence rates were better in the PN group (SL: 45.7% vs PN: 67.9%, p = 0.017). Locoregional recurrences occurred in 32.6% (15 of 46 patients) of the SL group and in 8.5% (4 of 47 patients) of the PN group. In multivariate analysis, performing sleeve resection in patients with a positive N1 lymph node was a significant risk factor for developing locoregional recurrence (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the overall survival rates were similar, sleeve resection resulted in higher locoregional recurrence, particularly in patients with positive N1 lymph nodes. This finding suggests that sleeve resection should be performed in selected patients, such as those without lymph node metastasis.

Comparison of Morbidity, 30-Day Mortality, and Long-Term Survival After Pneumonectomy and Sleeve Lobectomy For Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The advantage of sleeve lobectomy as an alternative to pneumonectomy for preserving lung function is obvious and among other arguments allows operating on patients with lung cancer who would not tolerate pneumonectomy. The purpose of this retrospective, nonrandomized study is to compare the early (30-day mortality) and late (5-year survival) outcomes of both procedures.

METHODS

The charts of 310 patients who underwent either pneumonectomy or sleeve lobectomy for lung cancer stages I to IIIA from 1987 to 1997 were reviewed. One hundred ninety-four patients underwent pneumonectomy, and 116 patients underwent sleeve lobectomy. Specific operative complications, i.e., anastomotic leakage versus stump dehiscence, perioperative complications, 30-day or in-hospital mortality, and 5-year survival were registered for comparison of the immediate risk of the respective procedures.

RESULTS

In the bronchial sleeve lobectomy group, the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 6.9% (8 of 116 patients) and the operative mortality was 4.3%. The incidence of bronchial stump fistulas after pneumonectomy was 3.6% (7 of 194 patients), and early mortality was 4.6%. All but 6 patients (98%) had a complete resection. Overall 5-year survival after sleeve lobectomy was 39% and after pneumonectomy, 27%. The distribution of 5-year survival stage by stage in either group is presented. Sleeve lobectomy, age younger than 65 years, pN0, and stage I are positive prognostic factors for long-term survival. In the multivariate analysis, pneumonectomy is a negative prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The indication for pneumonectomy versus sleeve lobectomy depends on the localization of the primary tumor on the one hand, and on cardiorespiratory function, which might be more often distinctly impaired in the sleeve group, on the other hand. This could explain why the mortality in the sleeve lobectomy group was identical with that in the pneumonectomy group. However, both techniques are appropriate treatment modalities of advanced lung cancer or patients with critical functional reserve. Therefore, whenever possible, sleeve lobectomy should be performed.

The beneficial effects of specialist thoracic surgery on the resection rate for non-small-cell lung cancer

We aimed to evaluate the effect of the appointment of a dedicated specialist thoracic surgeon on surgical practice for lung cancer previously served by cardio-thoracic surgeons. Outcomes were compared for the 240 patients undergoing surgical resection for lung cancer in two distinct 3-year periods: Group A: 65 patients, 1994-1996 (pre-specialist); Group B: 175 patients, 1997-1999 (post-specialist). The changes implemented resulted in a significant increase in resection rate (from 12.2 to 23.4%, P < 0.001), operations in the elderly (over 75 years) and extended resections. There were no significant differences in stage distribution, in-hospital mortality or stage-specific survival after surgery. Lung cancer surgery provided by specialists within a multidisciplinary team resulted in increased surgical resection rates without compromising outcome. Our results strengthen the case for disease-specific specialists in the treatment of lung cancer.

Experimental study of extracorporeal lung resection in dogs: ex situ sleeve resection and autotransplantation of the pulmonary lobe after extended pneumonectomy for central lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Extracorporeal lung resection as an alternative to pneumonectomy for central lung cancer is a procedure in which the unilateral lung is extirpated, removing the pulmonary lobe with the cancers and replanting the residual pulmonary lobe. The aim of this study was to investigate whether extracorporeal lung resection for lung cancer can be performed safely.

METHODS

Nineteen dogs were divided into the control and extracorporeal lung resection groups. The former (n = 5) underwent lung autotransplantion, and the latter was subdivided into ND1 (n = 7) and ND2 (n = 7) groups on the basis of the manner of lymph node dissection. By comparing the 3 groups, the adverse effects of lymph node dissection were examined.

RESULTS

All dogs in the control group had no complications. Four dogs in the ND1 group survived for 90 to 630 days after the operation. In the ND2 group 5 dogs succumbed within 30 days after the operation, although the other 2 dogs survived for 391 and 573 days, respectively. Bronchopulmonary fistulas were seen in 1 of the ND1 dogs and 3 of the ND2 dogs. Two of the latter were free of thrombus formation in the pulmonary arteries and veins of the autografts. In the ND2 group, compared with the control and ND1 group, the tissue blood flow at the bronchial anastomotic site indicated reduction between the 3rd and 14th postoperative days.

CONCLUSION

The extensive lymph node dissection had severe adverse effects on bronchial anastomotic healing in extracorporeal lung resection. Therefore extracorporeal lung resection can be applied to only a very limited number of patients with N0 or N1 disease.

Sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy for lung cancer: a comparative analysis of survival and sites or recurrences

BACKGROUND

Sleeve lobectomy (SL) in a lung-saving procedure indicated for central tumors for which the alternative is pneumonectomy (PN). Although it has been suggested that it may provide as good if not better survival results than pneumonectomy in the treatment of lung cancer, there are very few reports of clinical series comparing operative mortality, survival, and sites of recurrences between these procedures.

METHODS

Survival and sites of recurrences were analyzed and compared in 1,230 consecutive patients who underwent PN (n = 1,046) or SL (n = 184) in a single institution. Sleeve lobectomy was always done when technically possible. Thus PN was reserved for lesions that could not be removed by a bronchoplastic procedure. Pathologic staging was accomplished by nodal sampling except for N2 and selected N1 patients who underwent mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Ultimately, all patients were staged according to the 1997 TNM nomenclature.

RESULTS

There were 3 operative deaths of the 184 SL patients (operative mortality of 1.6%) and 55 operative deaths of the 1,046 PN patients (operative mortality of 5.3%, p = 0.036). Follow-up was complete for all 1,230 patients. For the entire group, survival at 5 years was 52% after SL and 31% after PN (p < 0.0001). These rates for patients with complete resection were 58% for SL and 33% for PN (p = 0.021). There was also a significant difference in survival favoring SL for patients with pathologic stage I (p = 0.018) and stage II (p = 0.005) disease. When recurrences occurred (n = 577), the site of first recurrence was local in 22% of patients with SL and in 35% of patients with PN.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleeve lobectomy can be done with a much lower risk of operative mortality than PN. Although it is recognized that stage for stage, PN patients likely have more advanced disease, long-term survival and local control are significantly better when complete resection can be achieved by SL.

Pneumonectomy for stage i (T1N0 and T2N0) nonsmall cell lung cancer has potent, adverse impact on survival

BACKGROUND

Surgically treated, stage I (T1N0 and T2N0) nonsmall cell lung cancer has a relatively favorable prognosis. Our aim was to determine whether performing a pneumonectomy in this group of patients has an impact on survival.

METHODS

Four hundred eighty-five patients with stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer undergoing lung resection between 1991 and 2000 were studied. Three hundred seventy-four patients underwent a smaller resection than a pneumonectomy and 111 had a pneumonectomy.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing less extensive resections were older (mean age, 65 vs 63 years) (p = 0.01); these patients were also more likely to have a history of chronic obstructive airway disease (9% vs 2%) (p = 0.01) or asthma (10% vs 3%) (p = 0.04), nonsquamous cell type (56% vs 27%) (p < 0.0001), and T1 tumor stage (66% vs 17%) (p = 0.002) than patients having a pneumonectomy. Operative mortality was 2.4% versus 8% (p = 0.01). Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) after less extensive resections were 85% (CI, 82% to 90%), 63% (CI, 56% to 69%), and 50% (CI, 42% to 57%), respectively, and after pneumonectomy the survival rates were 66% (CI, 53% to 73%), 47% (CI, 35% to 57%), and 44% (CI, 32% to 55%), respectively (p = 0.0006). When the Cox proportional hazards model was applied to all study patients (n = 485), pneumonectomy (p = 0.001), T2 stage (p = 0.006), older age (p = 0.03), and male gender (p = 0.03) were independent adverse predictors of survival. When the analysis was limited to the patients having T1N0 disease (n = 145), pneumonectomy (p = 0.0008), older age (p = 0.05), and nonsquamous cell type (p = 0.02) were independent adverse determinants of survival. When only the patients with T2N0 disease were analyzed (n = 340), male gender (p = 0.0005) and pneumonectomy (p = 0.01) were independent negative predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the patients who underwent pneumonectomy for stage T1N0 or T2N0 nonsmall cell lung cancer had a significantly poorer survival than those patients who underwent smaller lung resections.