51
|
Liew PL, Huang RL, Weng YC, Fang CL, Hui-Ming Huang T, Lai HC. Distinct methylation profile of mucinous ovarian carcinoma reveals susceptibility to proteasome inhibitors. Int J Cancer 2018; 143:355-367. [PMID: 29451304 PMCID: PMC6001480 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Revised: 01/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Mucinous type of epithelial ovarian cancer (MuOC) is a unique subtype with a poor survival outcome in recurrent and advanced stages. The role of type-specific epigenomics and its clinical significance remains uncertain. We analyzed the methylomic profiles of 6 benign mucinous adenomas, 24 MuOCs, 103 serous type of epithelial ovarian cancers (SeOCs) and 337 nonepithelial ovarian cancers. MuOC and SeOC exhibited distinct DNA methylation profiles comprising 101 genes, 81 of which exhibited low methylation in MuOC and were associated with the response to glucocorticoid, ATP hydrolysis-coupled proton transport, proteolysis involved in the cellular protein catabolic process and ion transmembrane transport. Hierarchical clustering analysis showed that the profiles of MuOC were similar to colorectal adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarcinoma. Genetic interaction network analysis of differentially methylated genes in MuOC showed a dominant network module is the proteasome subunit beta (PSMB) family. Combined functional module and methylation analysis identified PSMB8 as a candidate marker for MuOC. Immunohistochemical staining of PSMB8 used to validate in 94 samples of ovarian tumors (mucinous adenoma, MuOC or SeOC) and 62 samples of gastrointestinal cancer. PSMB8 was commonly expressed in MuOC and gastrointestinal cancer samples, predominantly as strong cytoplasmic and occasionally weak nuclei staining, but was not expressed in SeOC samples. Carfilzomib, a second-generation proteasome inhibitor, suppressed MuOC cell growth in vitro. This study unveiled a mucinous-type-specific methylation profile and suggests the potential use of a proteasome inhibitor to treat MuOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phui-Ly Liew
- Department of Pathology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Rui-Lan Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei, Taiwan.,Translational epigenetic center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chun Weng
- Translational epigenetic center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Lang Fang
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Pathology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tim Hui-Ming Huang
- Department of Molecular Medicine/Institute of Biotechnology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Hung-Cheng Lai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei, Taiwan.,Translational epigenetic center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, People's Republic of China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Changsha, 410078, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Mutational Aberrations Detected in Mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer of Asian Women. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 28:428-436. [PMID: 29465505 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancers (mEOCs) respond poorly to conventional chemotherapy and have a poor prognosis in advanced stages. The genomic landscape for mEOC in the Asian settings is ill defined. We seek to identify various mutational aberrations present in mEOC and correlate them with clinical outcomes. METHODS A total of 199 cases of mEOC were identified from a prospectively maintained gynecologic oncology tumor database. DNA was extracted and analyzed for KRAS mutations by using Sanger sequencing. Further MassArray sequencing was performed on 45 samples. Clinicopathologic correlation was performed with the results obtained. FINDINGS KRAS mutation status was evaluable in 124 cases. Fifty-five percent (68/124) were KRAS negative, whereas 45% (56/124) harbored a KRAS mutation, lower than that in Western populations. Successful ascertainment of both KRAS and HER2 statuses by Sanger sequencing occurred for 105 cases. The proportion of the double-positive subtype (HER2+ and KRAS positive) was 8% (8/105); double-negative subtype (HER2- and KRAS negative), 34% (36/105); and cases with mutation in either KRAS or HER2, 58% (61/105). The KRAS mutation rate was 44%, 50%, and 29% among Chinese, Indians, and Malays, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival (P = 0.952) or progression-free survival (P = 0.635) between KRAS-positive and KRAS-negative patients. Similar results were observed for progression-free survival (P = 0.206) and overall survival (P = 0.440) when outcomes were examined between the 4 groups based on KRAS and HER2 mutation. Patients in the double-negative mutation subgroup had higher risk for death/progression compared with patients in the other 3 mutation subgroups. Further MassARRAY multiplexed profiling was performed in patients with sufficient DNA material (n = 45) and yielded KRAS mutations (n = 16), PDGFRA mutations (n = 3), PIK3CA (n = 1) and KIT (n = 1), and HRAS, FGFR, MET, and NRAS (n = 1 each). CONCLUSIONS Our study provides further knowledge about the mutational aberrations in mEOC in Asian populations. Neither the presence of KRAS mutation nor their correlation with HER2 mutations influenced outcomes.
Collapse
|
53
|
Crane EK, Brown J. Early stage mucinous ovarian cancer: A review. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 149:598-604. [PMID: 29429591 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Revised: 01/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOCs) are an uncommon subset of epithelial neoplasms, both clinically and molecularly distinct from other ovarian cancers. Pathologic diagnosis proves challenging, and metastatic disease from other sites-especially the digestive tract-must be excluded. Fortunately, most patients are diagnosed at an early stage of disease and often present with large, unilateral adnexal masses. Survival for patients with stage IA disease approaches over 90%, and surgery alone is sufficient. Patients with stage IB-II disease should receive adjuvant treatment but the specific regimen is controversial. In the following review, we provide an overview of mucinous ovarian carcinomas, with a particular focus on the treatment of patients with early stage disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin K Crane
- Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, USA.
| | - Jubilee Brown
- Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Relatively Poor Survival of Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma in Advanced Stage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 27:651-658. [PMID: 28399027 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Overall, patients with mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) are considered to have a better prognosis compared with the whole group of nonmucinous carcinomas. However, some studies indicate that patients with advanced-stage MOC might have a worse prognosis than those with advanced-stage serous ovarian carcinoma (SOC). We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was carried out identifying 19 articles that compare survival of patients with MOC and patients with SOC. Meta-analyses were performed for risk ratio (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) for all International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages together, as well as for early- and advanced-stage diseases separately. RESULTS Overall, patients with MOC showed a lower risk of dying within 5 years (RR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.69; n = 45 333) and a longer survival (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98, for univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively; n = 5540) compared with those with SOC. In contrast, in advanced-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages III and IV) disease, patients with MOC have a higher risk of dying within 5 years (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.13-1.17; n = 36 113) and a shorter survival (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.71-1.94; n = 19 907). CONCLUSIONS Patients with advanced-stage MOC have a significantly worse prognosis compared with patients with SOC, whereas in early stage, the prognosis of patients with MOC is better.
Collapse
|
55
|
Abstract
Mucinous tumours involving the ovary may be benign, borderline, or malignant. Malignant tumours may be primary or metastatic. Differentiation between primary and metastatic involvement of the ovary is critical for optimal patient management. Even among skilled pathologists, this distinction can be problematic, as can the distinction between borderline ovarian tumour of intestinal type and well-differentiated invasive primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Primary invasive mucinous ovarian carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma metastatic to the ovary do have distinct patterns of macroscopic and microscopic involvement which will reveal the correct diagnosis in many cases. There are also well-recognized patterns of immunohistochemical staining that can further assist in this differentiation. As a result of the application of these histopathological techniques, the incidence of primary invasive mucinous epithelial carcinoma has fallen over recent years from ∼12% to ∼3%. However, even in recent multicentre clinical trials such as GOG 182, expert pathological review suggests that ∼60% of tumours originally classified as primary invasive mucinous carcinomas were in fact metastatic tumours to the ovary. Review of outcome data for patients with mucinous carcinoma entered into multicentre trials suggests that this subtype of disease has a particularly poor prognosis in comparison with other subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. Historically, patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (mEOC) have been treated in the same way as other subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. While there is undoubtedly a response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy, retrospective reviews of individual centre experience suggest that this is substantially lower than for high-grade papillary serous carcinoma and in the order of only 30%-40%. The mEOC trial was established to investigate the possibility that the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (chemotherapy drugs more commonly used in colorectal carcinoma) may be superior to conventional carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, there was also a randomization to bevacizumab. Unfortunately, this trial closed early, 5 years after initiation having recruited just 50 of a proposed 322 patients. mEOC is now characterized as a type I tumour with an identifiable stepwise progression from a premalignant lesion, through non-invasive, to invasive malignancy. Molecular characterization of mEOC reveals it to be distinct from other subtypes of the disease with a KRAS mutation occurring in 40%-50% of patients. Other gene abnormalities including HER2 amplification in ∼19% also occur. This raises the possibility of the use of targeted molecular therapies which with molecular analysis of individual patient tumours could form the basis of a future clinical trial. It is, however, clear that if trials are to be conducted in this rare subtype of disease, they will need to be truly international in nature and carefully designed, possibly using an adaptive stepwise approach and will require an appropriate level of funding with a realistic assessment of likely recruitment. Associated translational research will clearly be essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J Perren
- Professor of Women's Cancers and Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer Medicine and Pathology, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Öge T, Öztürk E, Yalçın ÖT. Does size matter? Retrospective analysis of large gynecologic tumors. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2017; 18:195-199. [PMID: 29278233 PMCID: PMC5776159 DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.2017.0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the characteristics of patients who underwent surgery due to the presence of a large pelvic-abdominal mass over a 5-year period in a university clinic. MATERIAL AND METHODS Among 3476 gynecologic operations, intraoperative findings were evaluated retrospectively. Uterine and/or adnexal masses smaller than 20 cm were excluded to refine "large" tumors and 74 patients with large tumors were enrolled in the study group. Demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, and results of histopathologic examinations were recorded. Moreover, preoperative and intraoperative findings were compared among tumors with adnexal origin according to their final histopathologic results. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 46 years. The most common symptom was abdominal pain, as recorded in 38 (51.4%) patients. Among all patients, 31 (41.9%) had coexisting illness and 13 (17.6%) had a history of surgery. The mean tumor diameter was 25.9±8.6 cm (20-60) and 60 (78.9%) tumors were of adnexal origin. The ratios of malignancy for large adnexal and uterine tumors were 34.4% and 12.5%, respectively. When the large adnexal tumors were re-evaluated, the mean cancer antigen (CA) 125 level was significantly higher, and ascites was more frequently detected in malignant tumors (p<0.01) then in benign and borderline tumors. CONCLUSION Benign and borderline tumors are more common among large abdominopelvic masses, although the presence of ascites and elevated CA 125 may present malignancy in large gynecologic tumors. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to define the characteristics of large tumors and their malignant potentials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tufan Öge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University School of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey
| | - Emel Öztürk
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beyhekim State Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Ömer T. Yalçın
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University School of Medicine, Eskişehir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Goode EL, Block MS, Kalli KR, Vierkant RA, Chen W, Fogarty ZC, Gentry-Maharaj A, Tołoczko A, Hein A, Bouligny AL, Jensen A, Osorio A, Hartkopf A, Ryan A, Chudecka-Głaz A, Magliocco AM, Hartmann A, Jung AY, Gao B, Hernandez BY, Fridley BL, McCauley BM, Kennedy CJ, Wang C, Karpinskyj C, de Sousa CB, Tiezzi DG, Wachter DL, Herpel E, Taran FA, Modugno F, Nelson G, Lubiński J, Menkiszak J, Alsop J, Lester J, García-Donas J, Nation J, Hung J, Palacios J, Rothstein JH, Kelley JL, de Andrade JM, Robles-Díaz L, Intermaggio MP, Widschwendter M, Beckmann MW, Ruebner M, Jimenez-Linan M, Singh N, Oszurek O, Harnett PR, Rambau PF, Sinn P, Wagner P, Ghatage P, Sharma R, Edwards RP, Ness RB, Orsulic S, Brucker SY, Johnatty SE, Longacre TA, Ursula E, McGuire V, Sieh W, Natanzon Y, Li Z, Whittemore AS, Anna D, Staebler A, Karlan BY, Gilks B, Bowtell DD, Høgdall E, Candido dos Reis FJ, Steed H, Campbell IG, Gronwald J, Benítez J, Koziak JM, Chang-Claude J, Moysich KB, Kelemen LE, Cook LS, Goodman MT, García MJ, Fasching PA, Kommoss S, Deen S, Kjaer SK, Menon U, Brenton JD, Pharoah PDP, Chenevix-Trench G, Huntsman DG, Winham SJ, Köbel M, Ramus SJ. Dose-Response Association of CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Survival Time in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3:e173290. [PMID: 29049607 PMCID: PMC5744673 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 231] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Importance Cytotoxic CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) participate in immune control of epithelial ovarian cancer; however, little is known about prognostic patterns of CD8+ TILs by histotype and in relation to other clinical factors. Objective To define the prognostic role of CD8+ TILs in epithelial ovarian cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter observational, prospective survival cohort study of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis Consortium. More than 5500 patients, including 3196 with high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs), were followed prospectively for over 24 650 person-years. Exposures Following immunohistochemical analysis, CD8+ TILs were identified within the epithelial components of tumor islets. Patients were grouped based on the estimated number of CD8+ TILs per high-powered field: negative (none), low (1-2), moderate (3-19), and high (≥20). CD8+ TILs in a subset of patients were also assessed in a quantitative, uncategorized manner, and the functional form of associations with survival was assessed using penalized B-splines. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival time. Results The final sample included 5577 women; mean age at diagnosis was 58.4 years (median, 58.2 years). Among the 5 major invasive histotypes, HGSOCs showed the most infiltration. CD8+ TILs in HGSOCs were significantly associated with longer overall survival; median survival was 2.8 years for patients with no CD8+ TILs and 3.0 years, 3.8 years, and 5.1 years for patients with low, moderate, or high levels of CD8+ TILs, respectively (P value for trend = 4.2 × 10−16). A survival benefit was also observed among women with endometrioid and mucinous carcinomas, but not for those with the other histotypes. Among HGSOCs, CD8+ TILs were favorable regardless of extent of residual disease following cytoreduction, known standard treatment, and germline BRCA1 pathogenic mutation, but were not prognostic for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Evaluation of uncategorized CD8+ TIL counts showed a near-log-linear functional form. Conclusions and Relevance This study demonstrates the histotype-specific nature of immune infiltration and provides definitive evidence for a dose-response relationship between CD8+ TILs and HGSOC survival. That the extent of infiltration is prognostic, not merely its presence or absence, suggests that understanding factors that drive infiltration will be the key to unraveling outcome heterogeneity in this cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew S Block
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Robert A Vierkant
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Wenqian Chen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zachary C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Aleksandra Tołoczko
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany
| | - Aliecia L Bouligny
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Health Sciences, Spelman College, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Allan Jensen
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ana Osorio
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andy Ryan
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anita Chudecka-Głaz
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University
| | - Audrey Y Jung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bo Gao
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Brooke L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bryan M McCauley
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chloe Karpinskyj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christiani B de Sousa
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Daniel G Tiezzi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - David L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University
| | - Esther Herpel
- Tissue Bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Germany and Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florin Andrei Taran
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Womens Cancer Research Program, Magee-Womens Research Institute and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jan Lubiński
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Janusz Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenny Lester
- Women’s Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jesús García-Donas
- Medical Oncology Service, HM Hospitales – Centro Integral Oncológico HM Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jill Nation
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jillian Hung
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - José Palacios
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. IRYCIS. Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain. CIBERONC
| | - Joseph H Rothstein
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jurandyr M de Andrade
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Luis Robles-Díaz
- Familial Cancer Unit and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria P Intermaggio
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany
| | | | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | - Oleg Oszurek
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Paul R Harnett
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Pathology Department, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences-Bugando, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Peter Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Philipp Wagner
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Pathology West ICPMR Westmead, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- University of Western Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert P Edwards
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Roberta B Ness
- The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- Women’s Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sharon E Johnatty
- Department of Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Teri A Longacre
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Eilber Ursula
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yanina Natanzon
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Zheng Li
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Tumor Hospital), Kunming, China
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - deFazio Anna
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annette Staebler
- Tübingen University Hospital, Institute of Pathology, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Women’s Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Blake Gilks
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia,Canada
| | - David D Bowtell
- Cancer Genomics Program, Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- The Garvan Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Molecular Unit, Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Francisco J Candido dos Reis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ian G Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Javier Benítez
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Linda S Cook
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - María José García
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Suha Deen
- Department of Histopathology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Usha Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - James D Brenton
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul DP Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Translational and Applied Genomics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- The Garvan Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Goode EL, Block MS, Kalli KR, Vierkant RA, Chen W, Fogarty ZC, Gentry-Maharaj A, Tołoczko A, Hein A, Bouligny AL, Jensen A, Osorio A, Hartkopf A, Ryan A, Chudecka-Głaz A, Magliocco AM, Hartmann A, Jung AY, Gao B, Hernandez BY, Fridley BL, McCauley BM, Kennedy CJ, Wang C, Karpinskyj C, de Sousa CB, Tiezzi DG, Wachter DL, Herpel E, Taran FA, Modugno F, Nelson G, Lubiński J, Menkiszak J, Alsop J, Lester J, García-Donas J, Nation J, Hung J, Palacios J, Rothstein JH, Kelley JL, de Andrade JM, Robles-Díaz L, Intermaggio MP, Widschwendter M, Beckmann MW, Ruebner M, Jimenez-Linan M, Singh N, Oszurek O, Harnett PR, Rambau PF, Sinn P, Wagner P, Ghatage P, Sharma R, Edwards RP, Ness RB, Orsulic S, Brucker SY, Johnatty SE, Longacre TA, Ursula E, McGuire V, Sieh W, Natanzon Y, Li Z, Whittemore AS, Anna D, Staebler A, Karlan BY, Gilks B, Bowtell DD, Høgdall E, Candido dos Reis FJ, Steed H, Campbell IG, Gronwald J, Benítez J, Koziak JM, Chang-Claude J, Moysich KB, Kelemen LE, Cook LS, Goodman MT, García MJ, Fasching PA, Kommoss S, Deen S, Kjaer SK, Menon U, Brenton JD, Pharoah PDP, Chenevix-Trench G, Huntsman DG, Winham SJ, Köbel M, Ramus SJ. Dose-Response Association of CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Survival Time in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2017. [PMID: 29049607 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3290] [] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Cytotoxic CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) participate in immune control of epithelial ovarian cancer; however, little is known about prognostic patterns of CD8+ TILs by histotype and in relation to other clinical factors. Objective To define the prognostic role of CD8+ TILs in epithelial ovarian cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter observational, prospective survival cohort study of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis Consortium. More than 5500 patients, including 3196 with high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs), were followed prospectively for over 24 650 person-years. Exposures Following immunohistochemical analysis, CD8+ TILs were identified within the epithelial components of tumor islets. Patients were grouped based on the estimated number of CD8+ TILs per high-powered field: negative (none), low (1-2), moderate (3-19), and high (≥20). CD8+ TILs in a subset of patients were also assessed in a quantitative, uncategorized manner, and the functional form of associations with survival was assessed using penalized B-splines. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival time. Results The final sample included 5577 women; mean age at diagnosis was 58.4 years (median, 58.2 years). Among the 5 major invasive histotypes, HGSOCs showed the most infiltration. CD8+ TILs in HGSOCs were significantly associated with longer overall survival; median survival was 2.8 years for patients with no CD8+ TILs and 3.0 years, 3.8 years, and 5.1 years for patients with low, moderate, or high levels of CD8+ TILs, respectively (P value for trend = 4.2 × 10−16). A survival benefit was also observed among women with endometrioid and mucinous carcinomas, but not for those with the other histotypes. Among HGSOCs, CD8+ TILs were favorable regardless of extent of residual disease following cytoreduction, known standard treatment, and germline BRCA1 pathogenic mutation, but were not prognostic for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Evaluation of uncategorized CD8+ TIL counts showed a near-log-linear functional form. Conclusions and Relevance This study demonstrates the histotype-specific nature of immune infiltration and provides definitive evidence for a dose-response relationship between CD8+ TILs and HGSOC survival. That the extent of infiltration is prognostic, not merely its presence or absence, suggests that understanding factors that drive infiltration will be the key to unraveling outcome heterogeneity in this cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew S Block
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Robert A Vierkant
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Wenqian Chen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zachary C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Aleksandra Tołoczko
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany
| | - Aliecia L Bouligny
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA,Department of Health Sciences, Spelman College, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Allan Jensen
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ana Osorio
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain,Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andy Ryan
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anita Chudecka-Głaz
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University
| | - Audrey Y Jung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bo Gao
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Brooke L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bryan M McCauley
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chloe Karpinskyj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christiani B de Sousa
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Daniel G Tiezzi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - David L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University
| | - Esther Herpel
- Tissue Bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Germany and Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florin Andrei Taran
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,Womens Cancer Research Program, Magee-Womens Research Institute and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jan Lubiński
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Janusz Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenny Lester
- Women’s Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jesús García-Donas
- Medical Oncology Service, HM Hospitales – Centro Integral Oncológico HM Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jill Nation
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jillian Hung
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - José Palacios
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. IRYCIS. Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain. CIBERONC
| | - Joseph H Rothstein
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jurandyr M de Andrade
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Luis Robles-Díaz
- Familial Cancer Unit and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria P Intermaggio
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany
| | | | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | - Oleg Oszurek
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Paul R Harnett
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Pathology Department, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences-Bugando, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Peter Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Philipp Wagner
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Pathology West ICPMR Westmead, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,University of Western Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert P Edwards
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Roberta B Ness
- The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- Women’s Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sharon E Johnatty
- Department of Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Teri A Longacre
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Eilber Ursula
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yanina Natanzon
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Zheng Li
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Tumor Hospital), Kunming, China
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - deFazio Anna
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annette Staebler
- Tübingen University Hospital, Institute of Pathology, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Women’s Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Blake Gilks
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia,Canada
| | - David D Bowtell
- Cancer Genomics Program, Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia,The Garvan Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark,Molecular Unit, Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Francisco J Candido dos Reis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ian G Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia,Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Javier Benítez
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain,Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Linda S Cook
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - María José García
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain,Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany,David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Suha Deen
- Department of Histopathology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark,Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Usha Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - James D Brenton
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge, UK,Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK,Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul DP Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Centre for Translational and Applied Genomics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia,The Garvan Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Goode EL, Block MS, Kalli KR, Vierkant RA, Chen W, Fogarty ZC, Gentry-Maharaj A, Tołoczko A, Hein A, Bouligny AL, Jensen A, Osorio A, Hartkopf A, Ryan A, Chudecka-Głaz A, Magliocco AM, Hartmann A, Jung AY, Gao B, Hernandez BY, Fridley BL, McCauley BM, Kennedy CJ, Wang C, Karpinskyj C, de Sousa CB, Tiezzi DG, Wachter DL, Herpel E, Taran FA, Modugno F, Nelson G, Lubiński J, Menkiszak J, Alsop J, Lester J, García-Donas J, Nation J, Hung J, Palacios J, Rothstein JH, Kelley JL, de Andrade JM, Robles-Díaz L, Intermaggio MP, Widschwendter M, Beckmann MW, Ruebner M, Jimenez-Linan M, Singh N, Oszurek O, Harnett PR, Rambau PF, Sinn P, Wagner P, Ghatage P, Sharma R, Edwards RP, Ness RB, Orsulic S, Brucker SY, Johnatty SE, Longacre TA, Ursula E, McGuire V, Sieh W, Natanzon Y, Li Z, Whittemore AS, Anna D, Staebler A, Karlan BY, Gilks B, Bowtell DD, Høgdall E, Candido dos Reis FJ, Steed H, Campbell IG, Gronwald J, Benítez J, Koziak JM, Chang-Claude J, Moysich KB, Kelemen LE, Cook LS, Goodman MT, García MJ, Fasching PA, Kommoss S, Deen S, Kjaer SK, Menon U, Brenton JD, Pharoah PDP, Chenevix-Trench G, Huntsman DG, Winham SJ, Köbel M, Ramus SJ. Dose-Response Association of CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Survival Time in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2017. [PMID: 29049607 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3290]+[] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Cytotoxic CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) participate in immune control of epithelial ovarian cancer; however, little is known about prognostic patterns of CD8+ TILs by histotype and in relation to other clinical factors. Objective To define the prognostic role of CD8+ TILs in epithelial ovarian cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter observational, prospective survival cohort study of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis Consortium. More than 5500 patients, including 3196 with high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs), were followed prospectively for over 24 650 person-years. Exposures Following immunohistochemical analysis, CD8+ TILs were identified within the epithelial components of tumor islets. Patients were grouped based on the estimated number of CD8+ TILs per high-powered field: negative (none), low (1-2), moderate (3-19), and high (≥20). CD8+ TILs in a subset of patients were also assessed in a quantitative, uncategorized manner, and the functional form of associations with survival was assessed using penalized B-splines. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival time. Results The final sample included 5577 women; mean age at diagnosis was 58.4 years (median, 58.2 years). Among the 5 major invasive histotypes, HGSOCs showed the most infiltration. CD8+ TILs in HGSOCs were significantly associated with longer overall survival; median survival was 2.8 years for patients with no CD8+ TILs and 3.0 years, 3.8 years, and 5.1 years for patients with low, moderate, or high levels of CD8+ TILs, respectively (P value for trend = 4.2 × 10−16). A survival benefit was also observed among women with endometrioid and mucinous carcinomas, but not for those with the other histotypes. Among HGSOCs, CD8+ TILs were favorable regardless of extent of residual disease following cytoreduction, known standard treatment, and germline BRCA1 pathogenic mutation, but were not prognostic for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Evaluation of uncategorized CD8+ TIL counts showed a near-log-linear functional form. Conclusions and Relevance This study demonstrates the histotype-specific nature of immune infiltration and provides definitive evidence for a dose-response relationship between CD8+ TILs and HGSOC survival. That the extent of infiltration is prognostic, not merely its presence or absence, suggests that understanding factors that drive infiltration will be the key to unraveling outcome heterogeneity in this cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew S Block
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Robert A Vierkant
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Wenqian Chen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zachary C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Aleksandra Tołoczko
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany
| | - Aliecia L Bouligny
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA,Department of Health Sciences, Spelman College, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Allan Jensen
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ana Osorio
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain,Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andy Ryan
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anita Chudecka-Głaz
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University
| | - Audrey Y Jung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bo Gao
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Brooke L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Division of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bryan M McCauley
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chloe Karpinskyj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christiani B de Sousa
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Daniel G Tiezzi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - David L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University
| | - Esther Herpel
- Tissue Bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Germany and Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florin Andrei Taran
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,Womens Cancer Research Program, Magee-Womens Research Institute and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jan Lubiński
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Janusz Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenny Lester
- Women’s Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jesús García-Donas
- Medical Oncology Service, HM Hospitales – Centro Integral Oncológico HM Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jill Nation
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jillian Hung
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - José Palacios
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. IRYCIS. Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain. CIBERONC
| | - Joseph H Rothstein
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jurandyr M de Andrade
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Luis Robles-Díaz
- Familial Cancer Unit and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria P Intermaggio
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany
| | | | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | - Oleg Oszurek
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Paul R Harnett
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Pathology Department, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences-Bugando, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Peter Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Philipp Wagner
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Pathology West ICPMR Westmead, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,University of Western Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert P Edwards
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Roberta B Ness
- The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- Women’s Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sharon E Johnatty
- Department of Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Teri A Longacre
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Eilber Ursula
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yanina Natanzon
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Zheng Li
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Tumor Hospital), Kunming, China
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - deFazio Anna
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annette Staebler
- Tübingen University Hospital, Institute of Pathology, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Women’s Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Blake Gilks
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia,Canada
| | - David D Bowtell
- Cancer Genomics Program, Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia,The Garvan Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark,Molecular Unit, Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Francisco J Candido dos Reis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ian G Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia,Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Javier Benítez
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain,Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Linda S Cook
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - María José García
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain,Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen EMN, Germany,David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Tübingen University Hospital, Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Suha Deen
- Department of Histopathology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark,Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Usha Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - James D Brenton
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge, UK,Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK,Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul DP Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Centre for Translational and Applied Genomics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia,The Garvan Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Excluding Lynch syndrome in a female patient with metachronous DNA mismatch repair deficient colon- and ovarian cancer. Fam Cancer 2017; 17:415-420. [PMID: 29124495 PMCID: PMC5999177 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-0055-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Patients synchronously or metachronously presenting with ovarian and colon cancer can pose diagnostic challenges. A primary colon carcinoma can metastasize to one or both ovaries, two independent primary tumors can arise or an ovarian carcinoma can metastasize to the colon. Clinical and immunohistochemical characterization can aid the diagnosis. Recently, we reported that in difficult cases finding pathogenic APC variants supports a colonic origin.In this case report we describe the clinical history of a female patient suspected for Lynch syndrome. She was diagnosed with a bilateral ovarian cancer at age 44, followed by the detection of a colon carcinoma 12.5 months later. Lesions of both sites showed a DNA mismatch repair deficiency with immunohistochemical loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression without MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. In absence of germline MMR gene variants identical somatic MLH1 and CTNNB1 gene variants were found, indicating a clonal relation. MMR germline mosaicism was made unlikely by ultra deep sequencing of the MLH1 variant in DNA isolated from normal mucosa, blood, urine and saliva. Although initially being suspect for Lynch syndrome it was eventually concluded that a metachronously diagnosed colon carcinoma that metastasized to both ovaries was most likely.
Collapse
|
61
|
Abstract
There are 5 major histotypes of ovarian carcinomas. Diagnostic typing criteria have evolved over time, and past cohorts may be misclassified by current standards. Our objective was to reclassify the recently assembled Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource and the Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type cohorts using immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers and to develop an IHC algorithm for ovarian carcinoma histotyping. A total of 1626 ovarian carcinoma samples from the Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource and the Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type were subjected to a reclassification by comparing the original with the predicted histotype. Histotype prediction was derived from a nominal logistic regression modeling using a previously reclassified cohort (N=784) with the binary input of 8 IHC markers. Cases with discordant original or predicted histotypes were subjected to arbitration. After reclassification, 1762 cases from all cohorts were subjected to prediction models (χ Automatic Interaction Detection, recursive partitioning, and nominal logistic regression) with a variable IHC marker input. The histologic type was confirmed in 1521/1626 (93.5%) cases of the Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource and the Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type cohorts. The highest misclassification occurred in the endometrioid type, where most of the changes involved reclassification from endometrioid to high-grade serous carcinoma, which was additionally supported by mutational data and outcome. Using the reclassified histotype as the endpoint, a 4-marker prediction model correctly classified 88%, a 6-marker 91%, and an 8-marker 93% of the 1762 cases. This study provides statistically validated, inexpensive IHC algorithms, which have versatile applications in research, clinical practice, and clinical trials.
Collapse
|
62
|
Li ZH, You DY, Gao DP, Yang GJ, Dong XX, Zhang DF, Ding YY. Role of CT scan in differentiating the type of colorectal cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2017; 10:2297-2303. [PMID: 28490887 PMCID: PMC5414631 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s131008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Most colorectal cancers are classical adenocarcinomas (AC), and less frequent subtypes include mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAC) and signet-ring cell carcinomas (SC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the computed tomography (CT) findings that can help to differentiate MAC and SC from AC. Methods CT scans of 168 patients with pathologically proven MAC and 67 patients with pathologically proven SC were analyzed, and 220 patients with classical AC were also included as a control group. CT findings of the three groups were compared and contrasted in terms of the bowel involvement patterns, contrast enhancement patterns, and presence or absence of bowel obstruction, intratumoral calcification, pericolic fat infiltration, and local tumor extension to adjacent organs. Statistical analyses were made by using the one-way analysis of variance, least significant difference test, and Pearson’s chi-square test. Results Compared with classical AC, the MAC showed more severe (6.29±2.69 cm vs 4.57±1.74 cm, P<0.001) and higher percentage of occurrence of eccentric bowel-wall thickening (37.2% vs 11.5%, P<0.001). Heterogeneous contrast enhancement was most common in MAC (P<0.01), and MAC showed more areas with hypoattenuation (P<0.001). The presence of intratumoral calcification was most frequent in MAC (17.9% vs 2% vs 6.8%) (P<0.001); the SC also were more severe (5.75±2.28 cm vs 4.57±1.74 cm. P=0.001) than AC, but SC tend to show more cases of concentric even bowel-wall thickening (67.2%); homogeneous contrast enhancement was most common in SC (P<0.01), and it showed a target appearance. The presence of peritoneal seeding was most frequent in SC (35.8% vs 8% vs 2.7%, P<0.001), while the presence of regional lymph node metastasis (P=0.190) and direct invasion of adjacent organs or metastasis (P=0.323) were not significantly different among them. Conclusion Some radiological features by CT can be used to classify different colon tumor types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Hui Li
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Tumor Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming
| | - Ding-Yun You
- Department of Science and Technology, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - De-Pei Gao
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Tumor Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming
| | - Guang-Jun Yang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Tumor Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming
| | - Xing-Xiang Dong
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Tumor Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming
| | - Da-Fu Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Tumor Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming
| | - Ying-Ying Ding
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Tumor Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Leary AF, Quinn M, Fujiwara K, Coleman RL, Kohn E, Sugiyama T, Glasspool R, Ray-Coquard I, Colombo N, Bacon M, Zeimet A, Westermann A, Gomez-Garcia E, Provencher D, Welch S, Small W, Millan D, Okamoto A, Stuart G, Ochiai K. Fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG): clinical trial design for rare ovarian tumours. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:718-726. [PMID: 27993794 PMCID: PMC6246130 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This manuscript reports the consensus statements on designing clinical trials in rare ovarian tumours reached at the fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (OCCC) held in Tokyo, November 2015. Three important questions were identified concerning rare ovarian tumours (rare epithelial ovarian cancers (eOC), sex-cord stromal tumours (SCST) and germ cell tumours (GCT)): (i) What are the research and trial issues that are unique to rare ovarian tumours? There is a lack of randomised phase III data defining standards of care which makes it difficult to define control arms, but identifies unmet needs that merit investigation. Internationally agreed upon diagnostic criteria, expert pathological review and translational research are crucial. (ii) What should be investigated in rare eOC, GCT and SCST? Trials dedicated to each rare ovarian tumour should be encouraged. Nonetheless, where the question is relevant, rare eOC can be included in eOC trials but with rigorous stratification. Although there is emerging evidence suggesting that rare eOC have different molecular profiles, trials are needed to define new type-specific standards for each rare eOC (clear cell, low grade serous and mucinous). For GCTs, a priority is reducing toxicities from treatment while maintaining cure rates. Both a robust prognostic scoring system and more effective treatments for de novo poor prognosis and relapsed GCTs are needed. For SCSTs, validated prognostic markers as well as alternatives to the current standard of bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin (BEP) should be identified. (iii) Are randomised trials feasible? Randomised controlled trials (RCT) should be feasible in any of the rare tumours through international collaboration. Ongoing trials have already demonstrated the feasibility of RCT in rare eOC and SCST. Mucinous OC may be considered for inclusion, stratified, into RCTs of non-gynaecological mucinous tumours, while RCTs in high risk or relapsed GCT may be carried out as a subset of male and/or paediatric germ cell studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A F Leary
- INSERM U981 Gynaecological Tumours, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - M Quinn
- ANZGOG Coordinating Centre, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - E Kohn
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - I Ray-Coquard
- INSERM U981 Gynaecological Tumours, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
64
|
Langdon SP, Gourley C, Gabra H, Stanley B. Endocrine therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2016; 17:109-117. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1272414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Simon P Langdon
- Division of Pathology, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Charlie Gourley
- University of Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hani Gabra
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Barbara Stanley
- University of Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Tamhankar AS, Ingle P, Engineer R, Bal M, Ostwal V, Saklani A. Signet ring colorectal carcinoma: Do we need to improve the treatment algorithm? World J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 8:819-825. [PMID: 28035252 PMCID: PMC5156848 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i12.819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2016] [Revised: 07/11/2016] [Accepted: 09/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To elaborate about this peculiar variant from a tertiary cancer center from India.
METHODS It’s a retrospective study (2011-2014) of all patients diagnosed with signet ring colo-rectal cancer (SRCC). Various clinico-pathological variables were studied.
RESULTS One hundred and seventy consecutive patients with SRCC were diagnosed (11.4% of all colorectal cancers). Median Age of the cohort was 41 years. Most common location was recto-sigmoid area (54.7%). Majority patients presented in stage III and IV (91.2%). Most of the stage IV patients had isolated peritoneal metastases (86.5%). Colonic tumors had higher incidence of peritoneal metastases (91.8% vs 83.3%) as well as isolated peritoneal recurrences (37.5% vs 16.7%) than rectal primaries. Thirty-seven point five percent of patients recurred after curative surgery. Amongst them 63.63% patients had isolated peritoneal recurrences. Circumferential resection margin (CRM) was involved in 17.9% patients. Median relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the cohort were 14.9 and 18.13 mo respectively. CRM involvement, colonic primary were associated with poorer RFS and OS.
CONCLUSION SRCC has predilection for peritoneal dissemination. More aggressive and/or extended chemotherapy schedules as well as prophylactic hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy at the time of primary surgery may be attempted in these patients.
Collapse
|
66
|
Soini T, Hurskainen R, Grénman S, Mäenpää J, Paavonen J, Pukkala E. Impact of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use on the cancer risk of the ovary and fallopian tube. Acta Oncol 2016; 55:1281-1284. [PMID: 27148621 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1175660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is used for contraception and heavy menstrual bleeding. A long-term hormone therapy can modify the risk of gynecologic cancers. Little is known about the impact of LNG-IUS use on the risk for invasive and borderline ovarian tumor subtypes or for primary fallopian tube carcinoma. We examined the associations of LNG-IUS use with these tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS We identified from the national Medical Reimbursement Registry of Finland the women aged 30-49 years who had used LNG-IUS for menorrhagia in 1994-2007, and from the Finnish Cancer Registry ovarian cancers and primary fallopian tube carcinomas diagnosed before the age of 55 and by the end of 2013. RESULTS A total of 77 invasive ovarian cancers and seven primary fallopian tube carcinoma cases were diagnosed in a cohort of 93 843 LNG-IUS users during the follow-up of 1 083 126 women-years. The LNG-IUS users had decreased risk for both invasive ovarian cancer [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.73] and for borderline ovarian tumors (SIR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-0.99) as compared to the background population. The risk of primary fallopian tube carcinoma was not increased (SIR 1.22, 95% CI 0.49-2.50). Decreased risks for mucinous (SIR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-0.87), endometrioid (SIR 0.55, 95% CI 0.28-0.98), and serous ovarian carcinomas (SIR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55-0.99) were seen in LNG-IUS users. CONCLUSIONS LNG-IUS use associated with decreased risk for both invasive and borderline ovarian tumors. The incidence of primary fallopian tube carcinoma did not significantly differ between LNG-IUS users and the background population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuuli Soini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyvinkää Hospital, Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Ritva Hurskainen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyvinkää Hospital, Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Seija Grénman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Johanna Mäenpää
- School of Medicine, University of Tampere, University of Tampere, Finland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jorma Paavonen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eero Pukkala
- School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Qin B, Moorman PG, Alberg AJ, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Bondy M, Cote ML, Funkhouser E, Peters ES, Schwartz AG, Terry P, Schildkraut JM, Bandera EV. Dairy, calcium, vitamin D and ovarian cancer risk in African-American women. Br J Cancer 2016; 115:1122-1130. [PMID: 27632371 PMCID: PMC5117784 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Revised: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND No previous study has evaluated the associations of dairy products, lactose, calcium and vitamin D with the risk of ovarian cancer in African-American women, who are known to have high mortality from the disease, as well as to be at risk for calcium and vitamin D deficiency. METHODS We evaluated these associations among 490 ovarian cancer cases and 656 age- and site-matched controls of African-American descent recruited into the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study, a population-based case-control study in 11 geographical areas in the US. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS An increased ovarian cancer risk was observed for whole milk consumption and lactose intake (highest quartile vs lowest: OR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.25-3.10;P-trend: 0.008). Calcium intake was associated with a decreased risk of ovarian cancer (OR=0.51, 95 CI%: 0.30-0.86; P-trend: 0.009), but vitamin D intake was not. Longer sun exposure in summer months was found to predict a lower risk (OR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.51-0.99; P-trend: 0.049). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that a high-calcium, low-lactose diet, and sun exposure in summer months may reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in African-American women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Qin
- Population Science, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Patricia G Moorman
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Anthony J Alberg
- Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Melissa Bondy
- Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michele L Cote
- Department of Oncology and the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Ellen Funkhouser
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35205, USA
| | - Edward S Peters
- Epidemiology Program, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Ann G Schwartz
- Department of Oncology and the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Paul Terry
- Departments of Public Health and Surgery, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Population Science, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Nitsche U, Friess H, Agha A, Angele M, Eckel R, Heitland W, Jauch KW, Krenz D, Nüssler NC, Rau HG, Ruppert R, Schubert-Fritschle G, Wilhelm D, Werner J, Engel J. Prognosis of mucinous and signet-ring cell colorectal cancer in a population-based cohort. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2016; 142:2357-66. [PMID: 27573386 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-016-2224-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Besides classical colorectal adenocarcinomas (AC), mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAC) and signet-ring cell carcinomas (SC) occur. Controversy remains regarding their prognostic role. Aim of this study was to define prognostic and histopathological specifications of mucinous and signet-ring cell colorectal cancer. METHODS A total of 28,056 patients with AC, MAC, and SC between 1998 and 2012 in the catchment area of the Munich Cancer Registry were analyzed. Time to locoregional recurrence and distant recurrence was calculated by cumulative incidence. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, calculation of relative survival, and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS AC occurred in 25,172 patients (90 %), MAC in 2724 (9.7 %), and SC in 160 (0.6 %). AC were less frequently localized in the proximal colon (34 %) compared to MAC (57 %, p < 0.001) and SC (76 %, p < 0.001). Both, MAC and SC had higher T, N, and M categories, lymphatic invasion, and worse grading (p < 0.001 for each). There were significant differences regarding the 10-year cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (p < 0.001), and distant recurrence (p < 0.001). For AC, the 5-year overall survival was 59 % (95 % confidence interval 58.0; 59.3), for MAC 52 % (50.2; 54.2), and for SC 40 % (32.1; 48.5; p < 0.001). However, MAC or SC did not remain independent prognostic factors for overall survival compared to AC upon multivariable analysis (p = 0.981). CONCLUSION This large cohort reveals specific histopathological and recurrence patterns for patients with colorectal AC, MAC, and SC. MAC and SC are diagnosed at more advanced tumor stages and therefore entail reduced survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Nitsche
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Helmut Friess
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Ayman Agha
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum München-Bogenhausen, Englschalkinger Str. 77, 81925, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Angele
- Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Renate Eckel
- Tumorregister München (TRM) des Tumorzentrums München (TZM), Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IBE), Klinikum der Universität München (KUM), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolf Heitland
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Minimalinvasive Chirurgie, Isarklinikum, Sonnenstraße 24-26, 80331, Munich, Germany
| | - Karl-Walter Jauch
- Klinikum der Universität München, Ärztliche Direktion, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Detlef Krenz
- Abteilung für Allgemein-, Gefäß-, Schilddrüsen- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum Dritter Orden, Menzinger Str. 44, 80638, Munich, Germany
| | - Natascha C Nüssler
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Klinikum München-Neuperlach, Oskar-Maria-Graf-Ring 51, 81737, Munich, Germany
| | - Horst-Günter Rau
- Abteilung für Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum Dachau, Krankenhausstr. 15, 85221, Dachau, Germany
| | - Reinhard Ruppert
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Klinikum München-Neuperlach, Oskar-Maria-Graf-Ring 51, 81737, Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriele Schubert-Fritschle
- Tumorregister München (TRM) des Tumorzentrums München (TZM), Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IBE), Klinikum der Universität München (KUM), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk Wilhelm
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Jutta Engel
- Tumorregister München (TRM) des Tumorzentrums München (TZM), Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IBE), Klinikum der Universität München (KUM), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Fan LC, Teng HW, Shiau CW, Tai WT, Hung MH, Yang SH, Jiang JK, Chen KF. Pharmacological Targeting SHP-1-STAT3 Signaling Is a Promising Therapeutic Approach for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Neoplasia 2016; 17:687-696. [PMID: 26476076 PMCID: PMC4611073 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2015.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2015] [Revised: 08/19/2015] [Accepted: 08/27/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
STAT3 activation is associated with poor prognosis in human colorectal cancer (CRC). Our previous data demonstrated that regorafenib (Stivarga) is a pharmacological agonist of SH2 domain-containing phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) that enhances SHP-1 activity and induces apoptosis by targeting STAT3 signals in CRC. This study aimed to find a therapeutic drug that is more effective than regorafenib for CRC treatment. Here, we showed that SC-43 was more effective than regorafenib at inducing apoptosis in vitro and suppressing tumorigenesis in vivo. SC-43 significantly increased SHP-1 activity, downregulated p-STAT3Tyr705 level, and induced apoptosis in CRC cells. An SHP-1 inhibitor or knockdown of SHP-1 by siRNA both significantly rescued the SC-43–induced apoptosis and decreased p-STAT3Tyr705 level. Conversely, SHP-1 overexpression increased the effects of SC-43 on apoptosis and p-STAT3Tyr705 level. These data suggest that SC-43–induced apoptosis mediated through the loss of p-STAT3Tyr705 was dependent on SHP-1 function. Importantly, SC-43–enhanced SHP-1 activity was because of the docking potential of SC-43, which relieved the autoinhibited N-SH2 domain of SHP-1 and inhibited p-STAT3Tyr705 signals. Importantly, we observed that a significant negative correlation existed between SHP-1 and p-STAT3Tyr705expression in CRC patients (P = .038). Patients with strong SHP-1 and weak p-STAT3Tyr705 expression had significantly higher overall survival compared with patients with weak SHP-1 and strong p-STAT3Tyr705 expression (P = .029). In conclusion, SHP-1 is suitable to be a useful prognostic marker and a pharmacological target for CRC treatment. Targeting SHP-1-STAT3 signaling by SC-43 may serve as a promising pharmacotherapy for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ching Fan
- Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Center of Excellence for Clinical Trial and Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hao-Wei Teng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Wai Shiau
- Institute of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Tien Tai
- Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Center of Excellence for Clinical Trial and Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Man-Hsin Hung
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Program in Molecular Medicine, School of Life Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shung-Haur Yang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department Of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Kai Jiang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department Of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuen-Feng Chen
- Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Center of Excellence for Clinical Trial and Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
McNeish IA. Prognostic pathways in early-stage ovarian cancer: can gene expression transcend histological subtype? Ann Oncol 2016; 27:1366-8. [PMID: 27358384 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- I A McNeish
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Survival of Patients With Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma and Ovarian Metastases: A Population-Based Cancer Registry Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 25:1208-15. [PMID: 25978291 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) generally have a favorable prognosis, although in advanced stage, prognosis is significantly worse compared to patients with serous ovarian carcinomas (SOCs). This might be due to the difficulties in distinguishing MOC from metastatic tumors. In the current study, we investigate prognosis of MOC compared to other types of ovarian cancer and to synchronous metastases to the ovary (sMO). MATERIALS AND METHODS Age, laterality, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, tumor grade, treatment, and survival were extracted from the Eindhoven Cancer registry for all patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinomas or sMO between 1990 and 2012. Five-year survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis were conducted. RESULTS A total of 3556 patients with primary ovarian carcinoma (of which 474 mucinous) and 289 with sMO were identified. In advanced stage, 5-year survival of patients with MOC was comparable to survival of patients with sMO (11% vs 11%, P = 0.32) and decreased compared to patients with SOC (26%, P < 0.01). For MOC, there was no clinically significant effect on 5-year survival of either debulking (12% vs 8%, P < 0.01) or chemotherapy (12% vs 10%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Patients with advanced stage MOC have a worse prognosis than advanced stage SOC. Survival is almost identical to that of patients with sMO. Effects of chemotherapy and debulking are limited in patients with MOC, which may be explained by suboptimal treatment due to the admixture of metastases in advanced stage MOC. Methods to differentiate between primary MOC and metastatic disease are needed to provide optimal treatment and insight in prognosis.
Collapse
|
72
|
Eyking A, Reis H, Frank M, Gerken G, Schmid KW, Cario E. MiR-205 and MiR-373 Are Associated with Aggressive Human Mucinous Colorectal Cancer. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0156871. [PMID: 27271572 PMCID: PMC4894642 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Accepted: 05/20/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) represents a distinct histopathological entity of colorectal cancer (CRC), which is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. Here, we found that expression levels of miR-205 and miR-373 were specifically upregulated only in patients with mucinous colon cancers, but not in CRC that lack mucinous components. To investigate the effects of miR-205 and miR-373 on intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) biology by gain- and loss-of-function experiments in a proof-of-concept approach, we chose previously established in-vitro human Caco-2-based models of differentiated, non-invasive (expressing TLR4 wild-type; termed Caco-2[WT]) versus undifferentiated, invasive (expressing TLR4 mutant D299G; termed Caco-2[D299G]) IEC. Enterocyte-like Caco-2[WT] showed low levels of miR-205 and miR-373 expression, while both miRNAs were significantly upregulated in colorectal carcinoma-like Caco-2[D299G], thus resembling the miRNA expression pattern of paired normal versus tumor samples from MAC patients. Using stable transfection, we generated miR-205- or miR-373-expressing and miR-205- or miR-373-inhibiting subclones of these IEC lines. We found that introduction of miR-205 into Caco-2[WT] led to expansion of mucus-secreting goblet cell-like cells, which was associated with induction of KLF4, MUC2 and TGFβ1 expression. Activation of miR-205 in Caco-2[WT] induced chemoresistance, while inhibition of miR-205 in Caco-2[D299G] promoted chemosensitivity. Caco-2[WT] overexpressing miR-373 showed mitotic abnormalities and underwent morphologic changes (loss of epithelial polarity, cytoskeletal reorganization, and junctional disruption) associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and progression to inflammation-associated colonic carcinoma, which correlated with induction of phosphorylated STAT3 and N-CADHERIN expression. Functionally, introduction of miR-373 into Caco-2[WT] mediated loss of cell-cell adhesion and increased proliferation and invasion. Reversely, inhibition of miR-373 allowed mesenchymal IEC to regain epithelial properties, which correlated with absence of neoplastic progression. Using xenografts in mice demonstrated miR-373-mediated acceleration of malignant intestinal tumor growth. In conclusion, our results provide first evidence that miR-205 and miR-373 may differentially contribute to the aggressive phenotype of MAC in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Eyking
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Henning Reis
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Magdalena Frank
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Guido Gerken
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Kurt W. Schmid
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Elke Cario
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this study is to summarize the contemporary understanding of low-grade epithelial ovarian cancers. RECENT FINDINGS Low-grade serous ovarian cancer is biologically distinct from high-grade serous ovarian cancer. It is associated with a high incidence of K-RAS and B-RAF mutations. Although described as indolent due to median progression-free and overall survivals of 20 and 99 months, respectively, with a median age of diagnosis of 43 years, it accounts for a significant number of patient-years lost. Retrospective studies suggest response rates of 5% for chemotherapy and 9% for antioestrogen therapy. A prospective study of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor selumetinib (response rate 15%) and retrospective bevacizumab studies suggest that these may be more effective approaches.Limited retrospective clinical data and even more sparse molecular data suggest that similar distinctions may exist between low-grade endometrioid and mucinous ovarian cancers and their respective high-grade counterparts, but more research is required in order to clarify the biological differences and the implications that these have for management. SUMMARY The results of phase III mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor studies in low-grade serous ovarian cancer and further clinical and biological assessment of low-grade endometrioid and mucinous ovarian cancers are urgently required.
Collapse
|
74
|
Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis of Mucinous Neoplasms Involving the Ovary. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2016; 35:191-208. [DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
75
|
Xu W, Rush J, Rickett K, Coward JIG. Mucinous ovarian cancer: A therapeutic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016; 102:26-36. [PMID: 27083591 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2015] [Revised: 03/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Mucinous ovarian cancer represents approximately 3% of epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC). Despite this seemingly low prevalence, it remains a diagnostic and therapeutic conundrum that has resulted in numerous attempts to adopt novel strategies in managing this disease. Anecdotally, there has been a prevailing notion that established gold standard systemic regimens should be substituted for those utilised in cancers such as gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies; tumours that share more biological similarities than other EOC subtypes. This review summarises the plethora of small studies which have adopted this philosophy and influenced the design of the multinational GOG142 study, which was ultimately terminated due to poor accrual. To date, there is a paucity of evidence to support delivering 'GI style' chemotherapy for mucinous ovarian cancer over and above carboplatin-paclitaxel doublet therapy. Hence there is an urge to develop studies focused on targeted therapeutic agents driven by refined mutational analysis and conducted within the context of harmonised international collaborations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Xu
- Mater Health Services, Raymond Terrace, Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia
| | - Jack Rush
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Kirsty Rickett
- UQ/Mater McAuley Library, The University of Queensland Library, Brisbane 4101, Australia
| | - Jermaine I G Coward
- Mater Health Services, Raymond Terrace, Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Kelemen LE, Warren GW, Koziak JM, Köbel M, Steed H. Smoking may modify the association between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival from ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 140:124-30. [PMID: 26549109 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2015] [Revised: 11/02/2015] [Accepted: 11/04/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tobacco smoking by cancer patients is associated with increased mortality. Less is known of the impact of smoking on recurrence risk and interaction with chemotherapy treatment. We examined these associations in ovarian cancer. METHODS Patients were identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry between 1978 and 2010 and were oversampled for less-common histologic ovarian tumor types. Medical records were abstracted for 678 eligible patients on lifestyle, medical and cancer treatment, and review of pathology slides was performed for 605 patients. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age at diagnosis, race, stage and residual disease. RESULTS Among patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (N=432), current smoking was significantly associated with shorter duration of overall (OS; HR, 8.56; 95% CI, 1.50-48.7) and progression-free (PFS; HR, 5.74; 95% CI, 1.05-31.4) survival from mucinous ovarian cancer only. There was no significant association between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival. However, among patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (N=44), current smokers had shorter PFS (HR, 4.32; 95% CI, 1.36-13.8; N=32 progressed/9 censored events) compared to never smokers, but the HRs were not statistically different across smoking categories (P interaction=0.87). CONCLUSIONS Adverse associations were observed between smoking status and OS or PFS among patients with mucinous ovarian cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. No significant effect was found from neoadjuvant chemotherapy on PFS overall; however, smoking may modify this association. Although needing replication, these findings suggest that patients may benefit from smoking cessation interventions prior to treatment with chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda E Kelemen
- Alberta Health Services-Cancer Control Alberta, 2210 2nd Street SW, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
| | - Graham W Warren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, 169 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina, 169 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 86 Jonathan Lucas Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | - Jennifer M Koziak
- Alberta Health Services-Cancer Control Alberta, 2210 2nd Street SW, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, S5-131 Lois Hole Hospital, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Park PY, Goldin T, Chang J, Markman M, Kundranda MN. Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Colon: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Oncol 2015; 8:466-71. [PMID: 26600781 PMCID: PMC4649730 DOI: 10.1159/000441772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) is the third leading cause of death in the United States. One of the histologic subtypes of CRC is signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), which has a distinct molecular and tumor biology from that of adenocarcinoma. Primary SRCC diagnosed at an early stage is very rare as most cases are detected at an advanced stage. Therefore, overall prognosis of SRCC is poor. Case Presentation A 36-year-old female presented to her primary care physician with new-onset progressive right lower quadrant pain without any significant past medical or family history. Computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast showed a 4.9 × 3.5 × 3.1 cm, lobulated, septated cystic mass arising from the cecum. The mass demonstrated wall enhancement and contained focal areas of coarse calcification. There was nodal involvement either locally or distally. The patient underwent right hemicolectomy, and pathology revealed a high-grade mucinous carcinoma with signet-ring cell variant invading through the muscularis propria and into the subserosal adipose tissue. The margins were negative for tumor, and no lymphovascular or perineural invasion was noted. None of the 14 resected pericolonic lymph nodes was positive for malignancy. Hence, she was staged as pT3, pN0, pMx-stage IIA. The appendix was not involved. Microsatellite instability testing showed the preservation of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins by IHC and PCR. Carcinoembryonic antigen level was within normal limits. Due to the patient's young age, aggressive histology and microsatellite-stable status, adjuvant fluropyrimidine (5-FU)-based therapy with the single agent capecitabine was initiated. The patient completed 6 months of adjuvant therapy and has been disease free for approximately 18 months. Conclusion Primary SRCC of the cecum is a rare disease. Given the poor prognosis of these patients, early-stage disease with microsatellite-stable patients should be considered for adjuvant 5-FU-based therapy in an attempt to prevent recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Y Park
- A.T. Still University, Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kirksville, Mo., USA
| | - Teresa Goldin
- Western Regional Medical Center at Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Goodyear, Ariz., USA
| | - John Chang
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Ariz., USA
| | - Maurie Markman
- Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Medicine and Science, Philadelphia, Pa., USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
78
|
Yoshioka Y, Togashi Y, Chikugo T, Kogita A, Taguri M, Terashima M, Mizukami T, Hayashi H, Sakai K, de Velasco MA, Tomida S, Fujita Y, Tokoro T, Ito A, Okuno K, Nishio K. Clinicopathological and genetic differences between low-grade and high-grade colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas. Cancer 2015; 121:4359-68. [PMID: 26488212 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2015] [Revised: 08/06/2015] [Accepted: 08/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas (MCs) are conventionally regarded as exhibiting high-grade differentiation, they can be divided by differentiation into 2 groups according to the glandular appearance: low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma (low-MC) and high-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma (high-MC). METHODS Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent surgical resection between 2000 and 2012 were enrolled in this study. Among the cases with MC, the clinicopathological and genetic differences between low-MC and high-MC were investigated with next-generation sequencing. RESULTS A total of 1373 patients with CRC were analyzed. Forty patients (2.9%) had MC, and 13 patients had high-MC. Patients with MC had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) periods than those with nonmucinous carcinoma. When low-MC patients and high-MC patients were compared, those with high-MC had significantly shorter DFS and OS periods than those with low-MC. Multivariate analyses revealed that high-MC was significantly associated with both shorter DFS and shorter OS, but low-MC was not. A genome analysis revealed that low-MC had a considerably larger number of mutations than high-MC, and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations and adenomatous polyposis coli mutations were particularly frequently found in low-MC. In contrast, SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4) mutations were frequently found in high-MC. CONCLUSIONS High-MC is an independent prognostic factor in CRC (but low-MC is not), and it is genetically different from other CRCs, including low-MC. Both the clinicopathological differences and the genetic differences suggest that low-MC and high-MC should be distinguished in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasumasa Yoshioka
- Department of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yosuke Togashi
- Department of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takaaki Chikugo
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kogita
- Department of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masataka Taguri
- Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masato Terashima
- Department of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuro Mizukami
- Department of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Hayashi
- Department of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuko Sakai
- Department of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Marco A de Velasco
- Department of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shuta Tomida
- Department of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Fujita
- Department of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadao Tokoro
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihiko Ito
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Okuno
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuto Nishio
- Department of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Kelemen LE, Lawrenson K, Tyrer J, Li Q, Lee JM, Seo JH, Phelan CM, Beesley J, Chen X, Spindler TJ, Aben KKH, Anton-Culver H, Antonenkova N. Genome-wide significant risk associations for mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Nat Genet 2015; 47:888-97. [PMID: 26075790 PMCID: PMC4520768 DOI: 10.1038/ng.3336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2014] [Accepted: 05/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies have identified several risk associations for ovarian carcinomas but not for mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOCs). Our analysis of 1,644 MOC cases and 21,693 controls with imputation identified 3 new risk associations: rs752590 at 2q13 (P = 3.3 × 10(-8)), rs711830 at 2q31.1 (P = 7.5 × 10(-12)) and rs688187 at 19q13.2 (P = 6.8 × 10(-13)). We identified significant expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) associations for HOXD9 at 2q31.1 in ovarian (P = 4.95 × 10(-4), false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.003) and colorectal (P = 0.01, FDR = 0.09) tumors and for PAX8 at 2q13 in colorectal tumors (P = 0.03, FDR = 0.09). Chromosome conformation capture analysis identified interactions between the HOXD9 promoter and risk-associated SNPs at 2q31.1. Overexpressing HOXD9 in MOC cells augmented the neoplastic phenotype. These findings provide the first evidence for MOC susceptibility variants and insights into the underlying biology of the disease.
Collapse
|
80
|
Desouki MM, Franklin RB, Costello LC, Fadare O. Persistent low expression of hZip1 in mucinous carcinomas of the ovary, colon, stomach and lung. J Ovarian Res 2015; 8:40. [PMID: 26081940 PMCID: PMC4479251 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-015-0169-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 06/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucinous carcinomas from different organs are morphologically similar and might share similarities at the molecular and biochemical levels that may illuminate their pathogenesis and influence management. The factors involved in the pathogenesis of mucinous carcinomas remain unknown; which is likely one contributor to the current dearth of biomarkers for detection. Because zinc changes are implicated in some cancers e.g., prostate; we assessed the possibility of a similar role in mucinous carcinomas. METHODS The goal of the current work is to study the expression of hZip1 by immunohistochemistry in mucinous carcinomas as compared with non-neoplastic epithelia and conventional carcinomas. Tissue microarray slides containing mucinous carcinomas of the ovary (n = 35), colon (n = 51), stomach (n = 32) and lung (n = 21) were used. RESULTS hZip1 showed persistent low expression in mucinous compared to ovarian serous carcinomas and normal tissue (P < 0.05), colonic adenocarcinoma and normal mucosa (P < 0.001), and gastric adenocarcinoma and normal epithelium (P < 0.05). hZip1 also showed low expression in pulmonary mucinous carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS hZip1 is consistently decreased in mucinous carcinomas from a variety of organs. Despite the fact that these preliminary findings are unlikely to be of much diagnostic significance, these findings suggest that hZip1 plays a fundamental role in the carcinogenesis of mucinous tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Mokhtar Desouki
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 1161 21st Avenue South, MCN, C-2310A, Nashville, TN, 37232-2561, USA.
| | - Renty B Franklin
- Department of Oncology and Diagnostic Sciences and the Greenebaum Cancer Center/Dental School, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
| | - Leslie C Costello
- Department of Oncology and Diagnostic Sciences and the Greenebaum Cancer Center/Dental School, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
| | - Oluwole Fadare
- Department of Pathology, San Diego Medical Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Vitiazeva V, Kattla JJ, Flowers SA, Lindén SK, Premaratne P, Weijdegård B, Sundfeldt K, Karlsson NG. The O-Linked Glycome and Blood Group Antigens ABO on Mucin-Type Glycoproteins in Mucinous and Serous Epithelial Ovarian Tumors. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0130197. [PMID: 26075384 PMCID: PMC4468167 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2015] [Accepted: 05/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucins are heavily O-glycosylated proteins where the glycosylation has been shown to play an important role in cancer. Normal epithelial ovarian cells do not express secreted mucins, but their abnormal expression has previously been described in epithelial ovarian cancer and may relate to tumor formation and progression. The cyst fluids were shown to be a rich source for acidic glycoproteins. The study of these proteins can potentially lead to the identification of more effective biomarkers for ovarian cancer. METHODS In this study, we analyzed the expression of the MUC5AC and the O-glycosylation of acidic glycoproteins secreted into ovarian cyst fluids. The samples were obtained from patients with serous and mucinous ovarian tumors of different stages (benign, borderline, malignant) and grades. The O-linked oligosaccharides were released and analyzed by negative-ion graphitized carbon Liquid Chromatography (LC) coupled to Electrospray Ionization tandem Mass Spectrometry (ESI-MSn). The LC-ESI-MSn of the oligosaccharides from ovarian cyst fluids displayed differences in expression of fucose containing structures such as blood group ABO antigens and Lewis-type epitopes. RESULTS The obtained data showed that serous and mucinous benign adenomas, mucinous low malignant potential carcinomas (LMPs, borderline) and mucinous low-grade carcinomas have a high level of blood groups and Lewis type epitopes. In contrast, this type of fucosylated structures were low abundant in the high-grade mucinous carcinomas or in serous carcinomas. In addition, the ovarian tumors that showed a high level of expression of blood group antigens also revealed a strong reactivity towards the MUC5AC antibody. To visualize the differences between serous and mucinous ovarian tumors based on the O-glycosylation, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using mass spectrometry average compositions (MSAC). CONCLUSION Mucinous benign and LMPs along with mucinous low-grade carcinomas appear to be different from serous and high-grade mucinous carcinomas based on their O-glycan profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varvara Vitiazeva
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| | - Jayesh J. Kattla
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sarah A. Flowers
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sara K. Lindén
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Pushpa Premaratne
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Birgitta Weijdegård
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Niclas G. Karlsson
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Horn LC, Einenkel J, Handzel R, Höhn AK. [Morphology of secondary ovarian tumors and metastases]. DER PATHOLOGE 2015; 35:336-47. [PMID: 24859239 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-014-1907-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The distinction between primary and secondary (metastatic) ovarian tumors is essential for the selection of appropriate surgical interventions, chemotherapeutic treatment and prognostic evaluation for the patient. Metastatic tumors of the ovary range between 5 % and 30 %. The majority of ovarian metastases in Europe and North America derive from colorectal (25-50 %) and breast cancers (8-25 %). A major issue is the differential diagnosis of mucinous tumors. Major features favoring metastasis include bilaterality, size < 10 cm, ovarian surface involvement, extensive intra-abdominal spread, and infiltrative growth within the ovary involving the corpus albicans and corpora lutea. An algorithm using bilaterality and tumor size (cut-off 10 cm) allows correct categorization in approximately 85 % of the cases. Although immunohistochemistry (especially CK7 and CK20 in mucinous tumors) using a panel of antibodies plays a valuable role and is paramount in the diagnosis, the results must be interpreted with caution and within the relevant clinical and histopathological context. It is necessary to note that the correct diagnosis of ovarian metastases always needs interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L-C Horn
- Abteilung Mamma-, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Institut für Pathologie, Department für Diagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 24, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
83
|
Inamura K, Yamauchi M, Nishihara R, Kim SA, Mima K, Sukawa Y, Li T, Yasunari M, Zhang X, Wu K, Meyerhardt JA, Fuchs CS, Harris CC, Qian ZR, Ogino S. Prognostic significance and molecular features of signet-ring cell and mucinous components in colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:1226-1235. [PMID: 25326395 PMCID: PMC4346446 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4159-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) represents a group of histopathologically and molecularly heterogeneous diseases, which may contain signet-ring cell component and/or mucinous component to a varying extent under pathology assessment. However, little is known about the prognostic significance of those components, independent of various tumor molecular features. METHODS Utilizing a molecular pathological epidemiology database of 1,336 rectal and colon cancers in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, we examined patient survival according to the proportion of signet-ring cell and mucinous components in CRCs. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute hazard ratio (HR) for mortality, adjusting for potential confounders including stage, microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, LINE-1 methylation, and KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations. RESULTS Compared to CRC without signet-ring cell component, 1-50 % signet-ring cell component was associated with multivariate CRC-specific mortality HR of 1.40 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.93], and >50 % signet-ring cell component was associated with multivariate CRC-specific mortality HR of 4.53 (95 % CI 2.53-8.12) (P trend < 0.0001). Compared to CRC without mucinous component, neither 1-50 % mucinous component (multivariate HR 1.04; 95 % CI 0.81-1.33) nor >50 % mucinous component (multivariate HR 0.82; 95 % CI 0.54-1.23) was significantly associated with CRC-specific mortality (P trend < 0.57). CONCLUSIONS Even a minor (50 % or less) signet-ring cell component in CRC was associated with higher patient mortality, independent of various tumor molecular and other clinicopathological features. In contrast, mucinous component was not associated with mortality in CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kentaro Inamura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mai Yamauchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Reiko Nishihara
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Sun A Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kosuke Mima
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Yasutaka Sukawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Tingting Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Geriatric Gastroenterology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mika Yasunari
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Xuehong Zhang
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kana Wu
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Curtis C Harris
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Zhi Rong Qian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Epithelial ovarian cancer: rationale for changing the one-fits-all standard treatment regimen to subtype-specific treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 24:468-77. [PMID: 24557434 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) are, although still treated as a single disease entity, often classified into type I tumors (low-grade serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell) and type II tumors (high-grade serous, undifferentiated cancers, carcinosarcomas). The aim of our study was to determine the incidence, clinical relevance, and prognostic and predictive impact of somatic mutations in both types I and II EOCs. METHODS Two hundred sixty-two evaluable, primary, high-risk stage I (grade 3, or aneuploid grade 1 or 2, or clear cell) and stage II-IV EOCs, collected at the University Hospitals Leuven and within the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 55971 trial, were genotyped for hotspot mutations in KRAS (COSMIC [Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer] coverage >97%), BRAF (>94%), NRAS (>97%), PIK3CA (>79%), PTEN, FBXW7 (>57%), AKT2, AKT3, and FOXL2, using Sequenom MassARRAY. RESULTS Of the 13% histopathologically classified type I tumors, 49% were KRAS or PIK3CA mutant versus only 2.9% in the type II tumors (87%). Mucinous subtypes harbored significantly more KRAS mutations than all nonmucinous tumors (50% vs 4%, P < 0.001). PIK3CA mutations were predominantly found in clear cell carcinomas (46.2%) and endometrioid carcinoma (20%) and were frequently associated with endometriosis. Moreover, low-grade serous tumors were more frequently KRAS or BRAF mutated (44%) than high-grade serous tumors (0.6%). KRAS or PIK3CA mutation did not correlate with progression-free survival or overall survival. Mutations in NRAS, PTEN, FBXW7, AKT2, AKT3, and FOXL2 were rare (<1%). CONCLUSIONS Somatic mutations are rare in type II EOCs, whereas type I EOCs contain distinct diseases with different driver mutations. In general, these tumors respond worse to standard paclitaxel carboplatin therapy. Clinical trials with molecular targeted therapy in the different subtypes of type I tumors are urgently needed using this theragnostic information.
Collapse
|
85
|
Crobach S, Ruano D, van Eijk R, Fleuren GJ, Minderhout I, Snowdowne R, Tops C, van Wezel T, Morreau H. Target-enriched next-generation sequencing reveals differences between primary and secondary ovarian tumors in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. J Mol Diagn 2014; 17:193-200. [PMID: 25545608 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2014] [Revised: 10/22/2014] [Accepted: 10/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Differentiating primary endometrioid or mucinous ovarian tumors from secondary ovarian tumors can be challenging. We compared somatic mutation profiles of primary and secondary ovarian cancers to investigate if these profiles can help diagnose ovarian tumors. Cancer-related genes (n = 115) were screened by target-enriched next-generation sequencing in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue from 43 primary endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinomas and 28 proven colorectal cancer metastases to the ovary. Results were validated by high-resolution melting curve analysis and Sanger sequencing. TP53, NOTCH1, PIK3CA, and FAT4 versus APC, TP53, KRAS, and FAT4 mutations were the most common in the primary ovarian tumors and ovarian colorectal cancer metastases, respectively. An inactivating APC mutation was found in 4.7% of primary ovarian tumors (2 of 43; 95% CI, 1.6%-10.9%). In contrast, inactivating APC mutations were identified in 71% of colorectal cancer metastases (20 of 28; 95% CI, 55%-88%) (P < 0.001; sensitivity: 71.4%, 95% CI, 51.1%-86.0%; specificity: 95.4%, 95% CI, 82.9%-99.1%). Loss of heterozygosity and APC promoter hypermethylation did not differ significantly between the primary and secondary ovarian tumors. NOTCH1 mutations were observed specifically in primary ovarian tumors, although at a low frequency, but not in metastases (6 of 41; 14.6%; 95% CI, 3.8%-25.4%). APC mutation analysis can be used to differentiate primary endometrioid and mucinous ovarian tumors from colorectal cancer metastases to the ovary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn Crobach
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Dina Ruano
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald van Eijk
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Gert Jan Fleuren
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ivonne Minderhout
- Laboratory for Diagnostic Genome Analysis (LDGA), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ronelle Snowdowne
- Laboratory for Diagnostic Genome Analysis (LDGA), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Carli Tops
- Laboratory for Diagnostic Genome Analysis (LDGA), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Tom van Wezel
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Morreau
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014; 24:S14-9. [PMID: 25341574 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Mucinous carcinomas of the ovary can be primary or metastatic in origin. Improvements in the pathological diagnosis have increased the ability to distinguish between primary and metastatic ovarian cancers and shown that primary mucinous carcinomas are a rare subtype of ovarian cancer. Most tumors are diagnosed at an early stage, and the prognosis after surgery is good. Advanced or recurrent mucinous carcinoma of the ovary responds poorly to current cytotoxic treatments, and the prognosis is poor. Here, we review the guidelines for surgery and the results of treatment of advanced and recurrent disease. Chemotherapy with platinum and paclitaxel is currently used to treat advanced disease, but the effect of these drugs is modest, and new treatments are needed.
Collapse
|
87
|
Ooki A, Akagi K, Yatsuoka T, Asayama M, Hara H, Yamamoto G, Nishimura Y, Yamaguchi K. Inverse effect of mucinous component on survival in stage III colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2014; 110:851-7. [PMID: 25111953 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2014] [Accepted: 07/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is has been recognized as a separate entity in colorectal cancer (CRC), adenocarcinoma with a mucinous component (ACM) remains poorly understood. METHODS The association of MAC and ACM with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was examined using the Cox proportional hazard model in 425 consecutive stage III CRCs. RESULTS Compared with conventional adenocarcinoma (CAC), patients with MAC exhibited independently worse DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.64; 95% CI, 1.21-5.80; P = 0.014) and OS (HR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.53-8.30; P = 0.003). Unexpectedly, ACM was significantly associated with worse OS than CAC (P = 0.002), despite having a similar DFS to CAC. Further, ACM patients after recurrence exhibited significantly worse OS than CAC patients (P < 0.001), similar to MAC. CONCLUSIONS Although ACM is similar to CAC with regard to estimated risk of recurrence, the outcome is extremely poor once recurrence occurs and is identical to MAC; one of the most aggressive phenotypes of stage III CRC. Thus, both MAC and ACM are adverse prognostic factors for OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Ooki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
88
|
Calura E, Martini P, Sales G, Beltrame L, Chiorino G, D'Incalci M, Marchini S, Romualdi C. Wiring miRNAs to pathways: a topological approach to integrate miRNA and mRNA expression profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:e96. [PMID: 24803669 PMCID: PMC4066781 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The production rate of gene expression data is nothing less than astounding. However, with the benefit of hindsight we can assert that, since we completely ignored the non-coding part of the transcriptome, we spent the last decade to study cell mechanisms having few data in our hands. In this scenario, microRNAs, which are key post-trascriptional regulators, deserve special attention. Given the state of knowledge about their biogenesis, mechanisms of action and the numerous experimentally validated target genes, miRNAs are also gradually appearing in the formal pathway representations such as KEGG and Reactome maps. However, the number of miRNAs annotated in pathway maps are very few and pathway analyses exploiting this new regulatory layer are still lacking. To fill these gaps, we present ‘micrographite’ a new pipeline to perform topological pathway analysis integrating gene and miRNA expression profiles. Here, micrographite is used to study and dissect the epithelial ovarian cancer gene and miRNA transcriptome defining and validating a new regulatory circuit related to ovarian cancer histotype specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Calura
- Department of Biology, University of Padova, via U. Bassi 58/B, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Martini
- Department of Biology, University of Padova, via U. Bassi 58/B, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sales
- Department of Biology, University of Padova, via U. Bassi 58/B, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Luca Beltrame
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", via La Masa 19, 20145 Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanna Chiorino
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Fondazione Edo ed Elvo Tempia Valenta, via Malta 3, 13900 Biella, Italy
| | - Maurizio D'Incalci
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", via La Masa 19, 20145 Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Marchini
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", via La Masa 19, 20145 Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Romualdi
- Department of Biology, University of Padova, via U. Bassi 58/B, 35121 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Earp MA, Kelemen LE, Magliocco AM, Swenerton KD, Chenevix-Trench G, Lu Y, Hein A, Ekici AB, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Lambrechts D, Despierre E, Vergote I, Lambrechts S, Doherty JA, Rossing MA, Chang-Claude J, Rudolph A, Friel G, Moysich KB, Odunsi K, Sucheston-Campbell L, Lurie G, Goodman MT, Carney ME, Thompson PJ, Runnebaum IB, Dürst M, Hillemanns P, Dörk T, Antonenkova N, Bogdanova N, Leminen A, Nevanlinna H, Pelttari LM, Butzow R, Bunker CH, Modugno F, Edwards RP, Ness RB, du Bois A, Heitz F, Schwaab I, Harter P, Karlan BY, Walsh C, Lester J, Jensen A, Kjær SK, Høgdall CK, Høgdall E, Lundvall L, Sellers TA, Fridley BL, Goode EL, Cunningham JM, Vierkant RA, Giles GG, Baglietto L, Severi G, Southey MC, Liang D, Wu X, Lu K, Hildebrandt MAT, Levine DA, Bisogna M, Schildkraut JM, Iversen ES, Weber RP, Berchuck A, Cramer DW, Terry KL, Poole EM, Tworoger SS, Bandera EV, Chandran U, Orlow I, Olson SH, Wik E, Salvesen HB, Bjorge L, Halle MK, van Altena AM, Aben KKH, Kiemeney LA, Massuger LFAG, Pejovic T, Bean YT, Cybulski C, Gronwald J, Lubinski J, Wentzensen N, Brinton LA, Lissowska J, Garcia-Closas M, Dicks E, Dennis J, Easton DF, Song H, Tyrer JP, Pharoah PDP, Eccles D, Campbell IG, Whittemore AS, McGuire V, Sieh W, Rothstein JH, Flanagan JM, Paul J, Brown R, Phelan CM, Risch HA, McLaughlin JR, Narod SA, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Gayther SA, Ramus SJ, Wu AH, Pearce CL, Pike MC, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Rzepecka IK, Szafron LM, Kupryjanczyk J, Cook LS, Le ND, Brooks-Wilson A. Genome-wide association study of subtype-specific epithelial ovarian cancer risk alleles using pooled DNA. Hum Genet 2014; 133:481-97. [PMID: 24190013 PMCID: PMC4063682 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-013-1383-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2013] [Accepted: 10/14/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a heterogeneous cancer with both genetic and environmental risk factors. Variants influencing the risk of developing the less-common EOC subtypes have not been fully investigated. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of EOC according to subtype by pooling genomic DNA from 545 cases and 398 controls of European descent, and testing for allelic associations. We evaluated for replication 188 variants from the GWAS [56 variants for mucinous, 55 for endometrioid and clear cell, 53 for low-malignant potential (LMP) serous, and 24 for invasive serous EOC], selected using pre-defined criteria. Genotypes from 13,188 cases and 23,164 controls of European descent were used to perform unconditional logistic regression under the log-additive genetic model; odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals are reported. Nine variants tagging six loci were associated with subtype-specific EOC risk at P < 0.05, and had an OR that agreed in direction of effect with the GWAS results. Several of these variants are in or near genes with a biological rationale for conferring EOC risk, including ZFP36L1 and RAD51B for mucinous EOC (rs17106154, OR = 1.17, P = 0.029, n = 1,483 cases), GRB10 for endometrioid and clear cell EOC (rs2190503, P = 0.014, n = 2,903 cases), and C22orf26/BPIL2 for LMP serous EOC (rs9609538, OR = 0.86, P = 0.0043, n = 892 cases). In analyses that included the 75 GWAS samples, the association between rs9609538 (OR = 0.84, P = 0.0007) and LMP serous EOC risk remained statistically significant at P < 0.0012 adjusted for multiple testing. Replication in additional samples will be important to verify these results for the less-common EOC subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madalene A Earp
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
90
|
Genetically engineered mouse models for epithelial ovarian cancer: are we there yet? Semin Cell Dev Biol 2014; 27:106-17. [PMID: 24685617 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2014] [Accepted: 03/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The development of preclinical spontaneous genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) requires an understanding of the genetic basis of the human disease. Such robust models have proven invaluable for increasing understanding of human malignancies as well as identifying new biomarkers and testing new therapies for these diseases. While GEMMs have been reported for ovarian cancer, the majority have proven disappointing overall in their recapitulation of paired genetic and histological features especially for serous ovarian epithelial cancer. This review describes GEMMs for ovarian cancer, in particular, high grade serous ovarian cancer and assesses these in light of recent changes in our understanding of the human malignancy.
Collapse
|
91
|
Köbel M, Bak J, Bertelsen BI, Carpen O, Grove A, Hansen ES, Levin Jakobsen AM, Lidang M, Måsbäck A, Tolf A, Gilks CB, Carlson JW. Ovarian carcinoma histotype determination is highly reproducible, and is improved through the use of immunohistochemistry. Histopathology 2014; 64:1004-13. [PMID: 24329781 DOI: 10.1111/his.12349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2013] [Accepted: 12/09/2013] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To assess the variation in ovarian carcinoma type diagnosis among gynaecological pathologists from Nordic countries, and whether a rationally designed panel of immunohistochemical markers could improve diagnostic reproducibility. METHODS AND RESULTS Eight pathologists from four countries (Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Finland) received an educational lecture on the diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma type. All tumour-containing slides from 54 ovarian carcinoma cases were independently reviewed by the participants, who: (i) determined type purely on the basis of histology; (ii) indicated whether they would apply immunohistochemistry in their routine practice; and (iii) determined type after reviewing the staining results. The results for six markers (WT1, p53, p16, HNF-1β, ARID1A, and progesterone receptor) were determined for all 54 cases, by staining of a tissue microarray. The median concordance with central review diagnosis was 86%, and significantly improved to 90% with the incorporation of immunostaining results (P = 0.0002). The median interobserver agreement was 78%, and significantly improved to 85% with the incorporation of immunostaining results (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS Use of the immunostaining results significantly improved both diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. These results indicate that ovarian carcinoma type can be reliably diagnosed by pathologists from different countries, and also demonstrate that immunohistochemistry has an important role in improving diagnostic accuracy and agreement between pathologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
92
|
Prior appendectomy does not protect against subsequent development of malignant or borderline mucinous ovarian neoplasms. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 132:328-33. [PMID: 24342438 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2013] [Revised: 12/03/2013] [Accepted: 12/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to concern that mucinous malignant or borderline ovarian neoplasms (MON) may represent metastatic deposits from appendiceal primaries, gynecologic oncologists routinely perform appendectomy in these cases. However, a multidisciplinary critique of this practice is lacking. METHODS The New England Case-Control study database was utilized to compare the effect of prior appendectomy against known risk factors for MON. Pathology and operative reports of local cases of MON were reviewed to estimate the frequency of microscopic mucinous lesions in the appendix. Protein expression patterns among mucinous ovarian, colorectal, and appendiceal cancers were compared by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS From the New England Case-Control study, 287 cases of MON were compared against 2339 age-matched controls. Prior appendectomy did not reduce the risk of MON (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.83-1.92, p = 0.23), while prior tubal ligation, parity, and breastfeeding were each protective against MON. Active smoking (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.48-2.80, p < 0.001) was associated with an increased risk of MON. Among 196 mucinous adnexal tumors, appendectomy did not reclassify any MON as appendiceal in origin. By immunohistochemistry, mucinous ovarian carcinomas tended to be CK7+/CK20-/MUC2-/CDX2-, whereas mucinous colorectal and appendiceal adenocarcinomas were typically CK7-/CK20+/MUC2+/CDX2+, although with some overlap in immunophenotype. Additionally, PAX8 was positive in a subset of MOC and negative in all appendiceal carcinomas. CONCLUSION Prior appendectomy is not protective against development of malignant or borderline MON. Routine appendectomy during surgery for MON seldom reveals an unsuspected GI primary in early stage tumors but may aid in final diagnosis in advanced stage cases. FUNDING National Cancer Institute grants P50-CA105009 and R21 CA-156021; The Honorable Tina Brozman 'Tina's Wish' Foundation; the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation (AMRF); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - Susan Smith Center for Women's Cancers; Robert and Deborah First Fund; The Gamel Family Fund; Mary Kay Foundation; Sandy Rollman Ovarian Cancer Foundation; Arthur Sachs/Fulbright/Harvard; La Fondation Philippe; La Fondation de France.
Collapse
|
93
|
Mucinous and signet-ring cell colorectal cancers differ from classical adenocarcinomas in tumor biology and prognosis. Ann Surg 2013; 258:775-82; discussion 782-3. [PMID: 23989057 PMCID: PMC3888475 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a69f7e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 190] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Mucinous adenocarcinomas are uncommon and signet-ring cell carcinomas are rare histological subtypes of colorectal cancer, which differ from classical adenocarcinomas in clinicopathology and prognosis. In particular, signet-ring cell carcinomas could be taken into account for individual risk estimation because of their clearly different behavior. Objectives: To define the prognostic value of different histological subtypes of colorectal cancer. Background: Most colorectal cancers are classical adenocarcinomas (AC). Less frequent subtypes include mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAC) and signet-ring cell carcinomas (SC). In contrast to established prognostic factors such as TNM and grading, the histological subtype has no therapeutical consequences so far, although it may reflect different biological behavior. Methods: Between 1982 and 2012, a total of 3479 consecutive patients underwent surgery for primary colorectal cancer (AC, MAC, or SC). Clinical, histopathological, and survival data were analyzed. Results: Of all 3479 patients, histological subtype was AC in 3074 cases (88%), MAC in 375 cases (11%), and SC in 30 cases (0.9%). MAC (51%, P < 0.001) and SC (50%, P = 0.029) occurred more frequently in right-sided tumors than AC (28%). Compared with AC, tumor stages and histological grading were higher in MAC and SC (P < 0.001 for each). Rates of angioinvasion were lower in MAC than in AC (5% vs 9%, P = 0.011). Rates of lymphatic invasion were higher in SC than in AC (67% vs 25%, P < 0.001). Five-year cause-specific survival was 67 ± 1% for AC, 61 ± 3% for MAC, and 21 ± 8% for SC (P < 0.001 for difference between the groups). In multivariable analysis, survival did not differ significantly between AC and MAC after correction for tumor stage. However, SC remained an independent prognostic factor associated with worse survival (hazard ratio = 2.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.6–3.8, P < 0.001). Conclusions: MAC and SC are histological subtypes of colorectal cancer with different characteristics than classical AC. Both are diagnosed in more advanced tumor stages, but the dismal prognosis of SC seems to be caused by its intrinsic tumor biology.
Collapse
|
94
|
Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Lee S, Duggan MA, Kelemen LE, Prentice L, Kalli KR, Fridley BL, Visscher DW, Keeney GL, Vierkant RA, Cunningham JM, Chow C, Ness RB, Moysich K, Edwards R, Modugno F, Bunker C, Wozniak EL, Benjamin E, Gayther SA, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Gilks CB, Huntsman DG, Ramus SJ, Goode EL. Biomarker-based ovarian carcinoma typing: a histologic investigation in the ovarian tumor tissue analysis consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013; 22:1677-86. [PMID: 23880734 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian carcinoma is composed of five major histologic types, which associate with outcome and predict therapeutic response. Our aim was to evaluate histologic type assessments across the centers participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium using an immunohistochemical (IHC) prediction model. METHODS Tissue microarrays (TMA) and clinical data were available for 524 pathologically confirmed ovarian carcinomas. Centralized IHC was conducted for ARID1A, CDKN2A, DKK1, HNF1B, MDM2, PGR, TP53, TFF3, VIM, and WT1, and three histologic type assessments were compared: the original pathologic type, an IHC-based calculated type (termed TB_COSPv2), and a WT1-assisted TMA core review. RESULTS The concordance between TB_COSPv2 type and original type was 73%. Applying WT1-assisted core review, the remaining 27% discordant cases subdivided into unclassifiable (6%), TB_COSPv2 error (6%), and original type error (15%). The largest discordant subgroup was classified as endometrioid carcinoma by original type and as high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) by TB_COSPv2. When TB_COSPv2 classification was used, the difference in overall survival of endometrioid carcinoma compared with HGSC became significant [RR 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.93; P = 0.021], consistent with previous reports. In addition, 71 cases with unclear original type could be histologically classified by TB_COSPv2. CONCLUSIONS Research cohorts, particularly those across different centers within consortia, show significant variability in original histologic type diagnosis. Our IHC-based reclassification produced more homogeneous types with respect to outcome than original type. IMPACT Biomarker-based classification of ovarian carcinomas is feasible, improves comparability of results across research studies, and can reclassify cases which lack reliable original pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Köbel
- Authors' Affiliations: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; Department of Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care and Department of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology; Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology; Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Science Research; Division of Experimental Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Biostatistics and Informatics Shared Resource, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas; University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, New York; Women's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health; Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, UCL, London, United Kingdom; and Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
95
|
Calura E, Fruscio R, Paracchini L, Bignotti E, Ravaggi A, Martini P, Sales G, Beltrame L, Clivio L, Ceppi L, Di Marino M, Fuso Nerini I, Zanotti L, Cavalieri D, Cattoretti G, Perego P, Milani R, Katsaros D, Tognon G, Sartori E, Pecorelli S, Mangioni C, D'Incalci M, Romualdi C, Marchini S. MiRNA landscape in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer defines the histotype specificities. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19:4114-23. [PMID: 23766361 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-0360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the most lethal gynecologic diseases, with survival rate virtually unchanged for the past 30 years. EOC comprises different histotypes with molecular and clinical heterogeneity, but up till now the present gold standard platinum-based treatment has been conducted without any patient stratification. The aim of the present study is to generate microRNA (miRNA) profiles characteristic of each stage I EOC histotype, to identify subtype-specific biomarkers to improve our understanding underlying the tumor mechanisms. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A collection of 257 snap-frozen stage I EOC tumor biopsies was gathered together from three tumor tissue collections and stratified into independent training (n = 183) and validation sets (n = 74). Microarray and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) were used to generate and validate the histotype-specific markers. A novel dedicated resampling inferential strategy was developed and applied to identify the highest reproducible results. mRNA and miRNA profiles were integrated to identify novel regulatory circuits. RESULTS Robust miRNA markers for clear cell and mucinous histotypes were found. Specifically, the clear cell histotype is characterized by a five-fold (log scale) higher expression of miR-30a and miR-30a*, whereas mucinous histotype has five-fold (log scale) higher levels of miR-192/194. Furthermore, a mucinous-specific regulatory loop involving miR-192/194 cluster and a differential regulation of E2F3 in clear cell histotype were identified. CONCLUSIONS Our findings showed that stage I EOC histotypes have their own characteristic miRNA expression and specific regulatory circuits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Calura
- Department of Biology, University of Padova, Via U.Bassi, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
96
|
Primary invasive mucinous ovarian carcinoma of the intestinal type: Importance of the expansile versus infiltrative type in predicting recurrence and lymph node metastases. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49:1600-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2012] [Revised: 12/01/2012] [Accepted: 12/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
97
|
Ryland GL, Hunter SM, Doyle MA, Rowley SM, Christie M, Allan PE, Bowtell DDL, Gorringe KL, Campbell IG. RNF43 is a tumour suppressor gene mutated in mucinous tumours of the ovary. J Pathol 2013; 229:469-76. [PMID: 23096461 DOI: 10.1002/path.4134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2012] [Revised: 09/20/2012] [Accepted: 10/07/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Mucinous carcinomas represent a distinct morphological subtype which can arise from several organ sites, including the ovary, and their genetic characteristics are largely under-described. Exome sequencing of 12 primary mucinous ovarian tumours identified RNF43 as the most frequently somatically mutated novel gene, secondary to KRAS and mutated at a frequency equal to that of TP53 and BRAF. Further screening of RNF43 in a larger cohort of ovarian tumours identified additional mutations, with a total frequency of 2/22 (9%) in mucinous ovarian borderline tumours and 6/29 (21%) in mucinous ovarian carcinomas. Seven mutations were predicted to truncate the protein and one missense mutation was predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Six tumours had allelic imbalance at the RNF43 locus, with loss of the wild-type allele. The mutation spectrum strongly suggests that RNF43 is an important tumour suppressor gene in mucinous ovarian tumours, similar to its reported role in mucinous pancreatic precancerous cysts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina L Ryland
- Victorian Breast Cancer Research Consortium (VBCRC), Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
98
|
Schüler S, Ponnath M, Engel J, Ortmann O. Ovarian epithelial tumors and reproductive factors: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287:1187-204. [PMID: 23503972 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-2784-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2012] [Accepted: 02/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current knowledge about the etiology and pathogenesis of borderline tumors ovarian cancer with special emphasis on the role of endocrine treatments and reproductive factors to establish a foundation for future studies. METHODS We performed a systematic review on the relation between ovarian epithelial tumors (OET) and reproductive factors using the keywords: ovarian cancer, ovarian tumor, ovarian borderline tumor, age at menarche, age at menopause, parity, infertility, PCO syndrome, oral contraception, menopausal hormone therapy, fertility treatment. Totally, 3,290 abstracts were scanned for their relevance in this publication and 127 were finally included. RESULTS The incidence of ovarian epithelial cancer and ovarian borderline tumors is influenced by certain reproductive factors. The strongest protective effects are conferred by parity and use of oral contraceptive pills. Recent molecular biologic and histopathologic studies prove that OET represent a diverse group of tumors, each histologic type with a different genetic background. This is at least partly reflected in epidemiologic and clinical studies showing different risk modulating effects of reproductive factors and endocrine therapies on OET. CONCLUSIONS The etiology and pathogenesis of ovarian cancer are still not fully understood. None of the so far proposed hypothesis on the development of OET can fully account for the epidemiologic and clinical findings in the context of reproductive factors and OET development. Further research approaches are warranted and need to put more weight on the clinical and genetical diversity of OET to yield a more detailed insight into their pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Schüler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
99
|
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer frequently presents at an advanced stage where the cornerstone of management remains surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, despite sometimes dramatic initial responses, advanced ovarian cancer almost invariably relapses. Little progress has been made in the identification of effective targeted-therapies for ovarian cancer. The majority of clinical trials investigating novel agents have been negative and the only approved targeted-therapy is bevacizumab, for which reliable predictive biomarkers still elude us. Ovarian cancer is treated as a uniform disease. Yet, biological studies have highlighted the heterogeneity of this malignancy with marked differences in histology, oncogenesis, prognosis, chemo-responsiveness, and molecular profile. Recent high throughput molecular analyses have identified a huge number of genomic/phenotypic alterations. Broadly speaking, high grade serous carcinomas (type II) display significant genomic instability and numerous amplifications and losses; low grade (type I) tumors are genomically stable but display frequent mutations. Importantly, many of these genomic alterations relate to known oncogenes for which targeted-therapies are available or in development. There is today a real potential for personalized medicine in ovarian cancer. We will review the current literature regarding the molecular characterization of epithelial ovarian cancer and discuss the biological rationale for a number of targeted strategies. In order to translate these biological advances into meaningful clinical improvements for our patients, it is imperative to incorporate translational research in ovarian cancer trials, a number of strategies will be proposed such as the acquisition of quality tumor samples, including sequential pre- and post-treatment biopsies, the potential of liquid biopsies, and novel trial designs more adapted to the molecular era of ovarian cancer research.
Collapse
|
100
|
Jain A, Seiden MV. Rare epithelial tumors arising in or near the ovary: a review of the risk factors, presentation, and future treatment direction for ovarian clear cell and mucinous carcinoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2013:0011300200. [PMID: 23714502 DOI: 10.14694/edbook_am.2013.33.e200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Currently all advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancers are treated with a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, and complete tumor debulking surgery, followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel. This treatment recommendation is based on clinical trials that are mostly populated with women with high-grade serous carcinomas. Patients with mucinous or clear cell carcinomas of the ovary tend to present with earlier-stage disease, and may not require adjuvant chemotherapy; those with advanced-stage disease tend to have carboplatin-resistant disease. Patients with mucinous ovarian carcinoma have presentations and tumor biology that are similar to colorectal carcinomas and may benefit from colorectal regimens containing fluorouracil (FU) and oxaliplatin. Their tumors may also be KRAS wild-type or have HER2 amplification, and could benefit from drugs like cetuximab or trastuzumab. Patients with clear cell carcinoma of the ovary often harbor AIRD1a mutations, an early event in oncogenesis that is not a currently drugable target. Anecdotal cases and our biologic understanding of these malignancies suggest they might be preferentially sensitive to antiangiogenesis inhibitors. Focused international trials will be needed in both of these rare epithelial ovarian cancers to better define optimal treatment regimens.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/chemistry
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/diagnosis
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/epidemiology
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/genetics
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/therapy
- Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
- Female
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease
- Humans
- Neoplasm Staging
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/chemistry
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/genetics
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/therapy
- Ovarian Neoplasms/chemistry
- Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology
- Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics
- Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Risk Factors
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Jain
- From the Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|