51
|
Laskar SG, Kakoti S. Modern Radiation Oncology: From IMRT to Particle Therapy—Present Status and the Days to Come. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractThere has been tremendous technological development in the field of radiation oncology, mainly during the last few decades. Parallel advancements in imaging and accelerator technologies have contributed significantly to the same. Present-day radiation therapy is aimed at precision, in terms of physical accuracy of both its planning and delivery. This has been made possible by improvements in defining the target (use of various radiological and functional imaging modalities), advanced radiotherapy planning methods (intensity-modulated radiation therapy and recent emergence of particle therapy), and robust verification techniques (image-guided radiation therapy). These developments have enabled delivery of adequate tumoricidal doses conforming to the target, thereby improving disease control with reduced normal tissue toxicity in a wide range of malignancies. Elucidation of molecular pathways determining radioresistance or systemic effects of radiotherapy and strategies for therapeutic manipulation of the same are also being explored. Overall, we look forward to ensuring basic radiotherapy access to all patients, and precision radiation therapy to appropriate candidates (triaged by disease anatomy or biology and associated cost-effectiveness).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarbani Ghosh Laskar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sangeeta Kakoti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Weil CR, Lew FH, Williams VM, Burt LM, Ermoian RP, Poppe MM. Patterns of Care and Utilization Disparities in Proton Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Central Nervous System Malignancies. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100868. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
53
|
Yip AT, Yu J, Huynh-Le MP, Salans M, Unnikrishnan S, Qian A, Xu R, Kaner R, MacEwan I, Crawford JR, Hattangadi-Gluth JA. Post-treatment Neuroendocrine Outcomes Among Pediatric Brain Tumor Patients: Is there a difference between proton and photon therapy? Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 34:37-41. [PMID: 35345865 PMCID: PMC8956840 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Endocrinopathies were common among pediatric brain tumor survivors. Proton craniospinal irradiation had a lower risk of hypothyroidism. Non-medulloblastoma patients were less likely to develop endocrinopathies. Non-medulloblastoma patients were less likely to need hormone replacement therapy. Sex hormone deficiency was not observed in the proton cohort.
Purpose Pediatric brain tumor patients are vulnerable to radiotherapy (RT) sequelae including endocrinopathies. We compared post-RT neuroendocrine outcomes between pediatric brain tumor patients receiving photons (XRT) versus protons (PRT). Methods Using a prospectively maintained single-institution database, we analyzed 112 pediatric primary brain tumor patients (80 XRT, 32 PRT) from 1996 to 2019. Patient/treatment characteristics and endocrinopathy diagnoses (growth hormone deficiency [GHD], sex hormone deficiency [SHD], hypothyroidism, and requirement of hormone replacement [HRT]) were obtained via chart review. Univariable/multivariable logistic regression identified neuroendocrine outcome predictors. Time-adjusted propensity score models accounted for treatment type. Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) patients were evaluated as a sub-cohort. Results Median follow-up was 6.3 and 4.4 years for XRT and PRT patients respectively. Medulloblastoma was the most common histology (38%). Half of patients (44% in XRT, 60% in PRT) received CSI. Common endocrinopathies were GHD (26% XRT, 38% PRT) and hypothyroidism (29% XRT, 19% PRT). CSI cohort PRT patients had lower odds of hypothyroidism (OR 0.16, 95% CI[0.02–0.87], p = 0.045) on multivariable regression and propensity score analyses. There were no significant differences in endocrinopathies in the overall cohort and in the odds of GHD or HRT within the CSI cohort. SHD developed in 17.1% of the XRT CSI group but did not occur in the PRT CSI group. Conclusion Endocrinopathies were common among pediatric brain tumor survivors. Among CSI patients, PRT was associated with lower risk of hypothyroidism, and potentially associated with lower incidence of SHD. Future studies should involve collaborative registries to explore the survivorship benefits of PRT.
Collapse
|
54
|
Clinical Implementation of Robust Multi-isocentric Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy for Craniospinal Irradiation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:211-219. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
55
|
Moon P, Theruvath J, Chang J, Song Y, Shpanskaya K, Maleki M, Cheng AG, Ahmad IN, Yeom KW. MRI Correlates of Ototoxicity in the Auditory Pathway in Children Treated for Medulloblastoma. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e97-e104. [PMID: 34739428 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess diffusion and perfusion changes of the auditory pathway in pediatric medulloblastoma patients exposed to ototoxic therapies. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING A single academic tertiary children's hospital. PATIENTS Twenty pediatric medulloblastoma patients (13 men; mean age 12.0 ± 4.8 yr) treated with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without radiation and 18 age-and-sex matched controls were included. Ototoxicity scores were determined using Chang Ototoxicity Grading Scale. INTERVENTIONS Three Tesla magnetic resonance was used for diffusion tensor and arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Quantitative diffusion tensor metrics were extracted from the Heschl's gyrus, auditory radiation, and inferior colliculus. Arterial spin labeling perfusion of the Heschl's gyrus was also examined. RESULTS Nine patients had clinically significant hearing loss, or Chang grades more than or equal to 2a; 11 patients had mild/no hearing loss, or Chang grades less than 2a. The clinically significant hearing loss group showed reduced mean diffusivity in the Heschl's gyrus (p = 0.018) and auditory radiation (p = 0.037), and decreased perfusion in the Heschl's gyrus (p = 0.001). Mild/no hearing loss group showed reduced mean diffusivity (p = 0.036) in Heschl's gyrus only, with a decrease in perfusion (p = 0.008). There were no differences between groups in the inferior colliculus. There was no difference in fractional anisotropy between patients exposed to ototoxic therapies and controls. CONCLUSIONS Patients exposed to ototoxic therapies demonstrated microstructural and physiological alteration of the auditory pathway. The present study shows proof-of-concept use of diffusion tensor imaging to gauge ototoxicity along the auditory pathway. Future larger cohort studies are needed to assess significance of changes in diffusion tensor imaging longitudinally, and the relationship between these changes and hearing loss severity and longitudinal changes of the developing auditory white matter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yohan Song
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katie Shpanskaya
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Maryam Maleki
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alan G Cheng
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Iram N Ahmad
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Kristen W Yeom
- Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Mahajan A, NiveditaChakrabarty, Shukla S. A narrative review on radiation risk from imaging for COVID-19: Breaking the myths and the mithya. CANCER RESEARCH, STATISTICS, AND TREATMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/crst.crst_7_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
57
|
Breen WG, Paulino AC, Hartsell WF, Mangona VS, Perkins SM, Indelicato DJ, Harmsen WS, Tranby BN, Bajaj BVM, Gallotto SL, Yock TI, Laack NN. Factors Associated with Acute Toxicity in Pediatric Patients Treated with Proton Radiotherapy: A Report from the Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:155-162. [PMID: 34929404 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES Limited prospective information regarding acute toxicity in pediatric patients receiving proton therapy (PT) exists. In this study, Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry (PPCR) data was analyzed for factors associated with development of acute toxicity in children receiving passively scattered or pencil beam scanning PT. MATERIALS/METHODS Pediatric patients treated with PT and enrolled on the PPCR from 2016-2017 at seven institutions were included. Data was entered on presence versus absence of acute general, cardiac, endocrine, eye, gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary, hematologic, mouth, musculoskeletal, neurologic, psychologic, respiratory, and skin toxicities prior to (baseline) and at the end of PT (acute). Associations between patient and treatment variables with development of acute toxicity were assessed with multivariable modelling. RESULTS Of 422 patients included, PT technique was passively scattered in 241 (57%), pencil beam scanning in 180 (43%), and missing in 1 (<1%) patient. Median age was 9.9 years. Daily anesthesia for treatment was used in 169 (40%). Treatments were categorized as craniospinal irradiation (CSI) (n=100, 24%), focal CNS PT (n=157, 38%), or body PT (n=158, 38%). Passively scattered PT was associated with increased risk of hematologic toxicity compared to pencil beam scanning PT (OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.38-6.70, p=0.006). There were no other differences toxicities between PT techniques. Uninsured patients had increased risk of GI (OR: 2.71, 1.12-6.58, p=0.027) and hematologic toxicity (OR: 10.67, 2.68-42.46, p<0.001). Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were more likely to experience skin (OR: 2.45, 1.23-4.88, p=0.011), hematologic (OR: 2.87, 1.31-6.25, p=0.008), GI (OR: 2.37, 1.33-4.21, p=0.003), and mouth toxicities (OR: 2.03, 1.10-3.73, p=0.024). Patients receiving 49-55 Gy were more likely to experience skin (OR: 2.18, 1.06-4.44, p=0.033) toxicity than those receiving <49 Gy. CONCLUSION The PPCR registry highlights broad differences in acute toxicity rates in children receiving PT, and identifies opportunities for improvements in prevention, monitoring, and treatment of toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Stephanie M Perkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - W Scott Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | | | | | | | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Seidel C, Heider S, Hau P, Glasow A, Dietzsch S, Kortmann RD. Radiotherapy in Medulloblastoma-Evolution of Treatment, Current Concepts and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235945. [PMID: 34885055 PMCID: PMC8657317 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is the backbone of medulloblastoma treatment and the first treatment to achieve a cure in many patients. Within the last decades, significant efforts have been made to enhance efficacy in combination with chemotherapy. With this approach, a majority of low- and standard-risk patients can be cured. In parallel, many clinical trials have dealt with CSI-dose reduction and reduction of boost volume in order to decrease long-term toxicity, particularly neurotoxicity. Within these trials, standardized quality assurance has helped to increase the accuracy of treatment and improve prognosis. More recently, advances of radiotherapy techniques such as proton treatment allowed for better sparing of healthy tissue in order to further diminish detrimental long-term effects. Major future challenges are the adaption of radiotherapy regimens to different molecularly defined disease groups alone or together with new targeted agents. Moreover, and even more importantly, innovative combinatorial treatments are needed in high- and very-high risk situations. Abstract Medulloblastoma is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in children. During the last decades, the therapeutic landscape has changed significantly with craniospinal irradiation as the backbone of treatment. Survival times have increased and treatments were stratified according to clinical and later molecular risk factors. In this review, current evidence regarding the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy in medulloblastoma is summarized and discussed mainly based on data of controlled trials. Current concepts and future perspectives based on current risk classification are outlined. With the introduction of CSI, medulloblastoma has become a curable disease. Due to combination with chemotherapy, survival rates have increased significantly, allowing for a reduction in radiation dose and a decrease of toxicity in low- and standard-risk patients. Furthermore, modern radiotherapy techniques are able to avoid side effects in a fragile patient population. However, high-risk patients remain with relevant mortality and many patients still suffer from treatment related toxicity. Treatment needs to be continually refined with regard to more efficacious combinatorial treatment in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Sina Heider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Peter Hau
- Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Annegret Glasow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Stefan Dietzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Dell'Oro M, Wilson P, Short M, Hua CH, Merchant TE, Bezak E. Normal tissue complication probability modeling to guide individual treatment planning in pediatric cranial proton and photon radiotherapy. Med Phys 2021; 49:742-755. [PMID: 34796509 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy (PT) is broadly accepted as the gold standard of care for pediatric patients with cranial cancer. The superior dose distribution of PT compared to photon radiotherapy reduces normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for organs at risk. As NTCPs for pediatric organs are not well understood, clinics generally base radiation response on adult data. However, there is evidence that radiation response strongly depends on the age and even sex of a patient. Furthermore, questions surround the influence of individual intrinsic radiosensitivity (α/β ratio) on pediatric NTCP. While the clinical pediatric NTCP data is scarce, radiobiological modeling and sensitivity analyses can be used to investigate the NTCP trends and its dependence on individual modeling parameters. The purpose of this study was to perform sensitivity analyses of NTCP models to ascertain the dependence of radiosensitivity, sex, and age of a child and predict cranial side-effects following intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS Previously, six sex-matched pediatric cranial datasets (5, 9, and 13 years old) were planned in Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (13.7). Up to 108 scanning beam IMPT plans and 108 IMRT plans were retrospectively optimized for a range of simulated target volumes and locations. In this work, dose-volume histograms were extracted and imported into BioSuite Software for radiobiological modeling. Relative-Seriality and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models were used to calculate NTCP values for toxicity endpoints, where TD50, (based on reported adult clinical data) was varied to simulate sex dependence of NTCP. Plausible parameter ranges, based on published literature for adults, were used in modeling. In addition to sensitivity analyses, a 20% difference in TD50 was used to represent the radiosensitivity between the sexes (with females considered more radiosensitive) for ease of data comparison as a function of parameters such as α/β ratio. RESULTS IMPT plans resulted in lower NTCP compared to IMRT across all models (p < 0.0001). For medulloblastoma treatment, the risk of brainstem necrosis (> 10%) and cochlea tinnitus (> 20%) among females could potentially be underestimated considering a lower TD50 value for females. Sensitivity analyses show that the difference in NTCP between sexes was significant (p < 0.0001). Similarly, both brainstem necrosis and cochlea tinnitus NTCP varied significantly (p < 0.0001) across tested α/β as a function of TD50 values (assumption being that TD50 values are 20% lower in females). If the true α/β of these pediatric tissues is higher than expected (α/β ∼ 3), the risk of tinnitus for IMRT can significantly increase (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Due to the scarcity of pediatric NTCP data available, sensitivity analyses were performed using plausible ranges based on published adult data. In the clinical scenario where, if female pediatric patients were 20% more radiosensitive (lower TD50 value), they could be up to twice as likely to experience side-effects of brainstem necrosis and cochlea tinnitus compared to males, highlighting the need for considering the sex in NTCP models. Based on our sensitivity analyses, age and sex of a pediatric patient could significantly affect the resultant NTCP from cranial radiotherapy, especially at higher α/β values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.,UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Chia-Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.,Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Baliga S, Gallotto S, Bajaj B, Lewy J, Weyman E, Lawell M, Yeap BY, Ebb DE, Huang M, Caruso P, Perry A, Jones RM, MacDonald SM, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI. Decade Long Disease, Secondary Malignancy, and Brainstem Injury Outcomes in Pediatric and Young Adult Medulloblastoma Patients Treated with Proton Radiotherapy. Neuro Oncol 2021; 24:1010-1019. [PMID: 34788463 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma experience long term morbidity associated with the toxic effects of post-operative radiotherapy. Proton radiotherapy limits radiation dose to normal tissues thereby reducing side effects of treatment while maintaining high cure rates. However, long term data on disease outcomes and long-term effects of proton radiotherapy remain limited. METHODS 178 Pediatric medulloblastoma patients treated with proton radiotherapy between 2002-2016 at the Massachusetts General Hospital comprise the cohort of patients who were treated with surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. We evaluated EFS, OS, and LC using the Kaplan Meier method. The cumulative incidence of brainstem injury and secondary malignancies was assessed. RESULTS Median follow-up was 9.3 years. 159 patients (89.3%) underwent a gross total resection (GTR). The 10-year OS for the entire cohort, standard risk, and intermediate/high risk patients was 79.3%, 86.9%, and 68.9% respectively. The 10-year EFS for entire cohort, SR, and IR/HR cohorts was 73.8%, 79.5%, and 66.2%. The 10-year EFS and OS for patients with GTR/NTR were 75.3% and 81.0% versus 57.7% and 61.0% for STR. On univariate analysis, IR/HR status was associated with inferior EFS, while both anaplastic histology and IR/HR status was associated with worse overall survival. The 10-year cumulative incidence of secondary tumors and brainstem injury was 5.6% and 2.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort study of pediatric medulloblastoma, proton radiotherapy was effective and disease outcomes were comparable to historically treated photon cohorts. The incidence of secondary malignancies and brainstem injury was low in this cohort with mature follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Sara Gallotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Benjamin Bajaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jaqueline Lewy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth Weyman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Miranda Lawell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beow Y Yeap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David E Ebb
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary Huang
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul Caruso
- Department of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alisa Perry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robin M Jones
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Trybula SJ, Youngblood MW, Kemeny HR, Clark JR, Karras CL, Hartsell WF, Tomita T. Radiation Induced Cavernomas in the Treatment of Pediatric Medulloblastoma: Comparative Study Between Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:760691. [PMID: 34707999 PMCID: PMC8542782 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.760691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation induced cavernomas among children with medulloblastoma are common following external beam radiation (XRT) treatment with either photon or proton beams. However, with the increased utilization of proton beam therapy over the last decade we sought to determine if there was any difference in the development or natural history of these cavernous malformations (CM) or CM-like lesions. We performed a retrospective analysis of 79 patients from 2003 to 2019 who had undergone resection of medulloblastoma and subsequent XRT (30 photon or 49 proton beam therapy). The average age of patients at radiation treatment was 8.7 years old. Average follow up for patients who received photon beam therapy was 105 months compared to 56.8 months for proton beam therapy. A total of 68 patients (86.1%) developed post-radiation CMs, including 26 photon and 42 proton patients (86.7% and 85.7% respectively). The time to cavernoma development was significantly different, with a mean of 40.2 months for photon patients and 18.2 months for proton patients (p = 1.98 x 10-4). Three patients, one who received photon and two who received proton beam radiation, required surgical resection of a cavernoma. Although CM or CM-like lesions are detected significantly earlier in patients after receiving proton beam therapy, there appears to be no significant difference between the two radiation therapy modalities in the development of significant CM requiring surgical resection or intervention other than continued follow up and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Joy Trybula
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Mark W Youngblood
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Hanna R Kemeny
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Jeffrey R Clark
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Constantine L Karras
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - William F Hartsell
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Tadanori Tomita
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Shen CJ, Terezakis SA. The Evolving Role of Radiotherapy for Pediatric Cancers With Advancements in Molecular Tumor Characterization and Targeted Therapies. Front Oncol 2021; 11:679701. [PMID: 34604027 PMCID: PMC8481883 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.679701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Ongoing rapid advances in molecular diagnostics, precision imaging, and development of targeted therapies have resulted in a constantly evolving landscape for treatment of pediatric cancers. Radiotherapy remains a critical element of the therapeutic toolbox, and its role in the era of precision medicine continues to adapt and undergo re-evaluation. Here, we review emerging strategies for combining radiotherapy with novel targeted systemic therapies (for example, for pediatric gliomas or soft tissue sarcomas), modifying use or intensity of radiotherapy when appropriate via molecular diagnostics that allow better characterization and individualization of each patient’s treatments (for example, de-intensification of radiotherapy in WNT subgroup medulloblastoma), as well as exploring more effective targeted systemic therapies that may allow omission or delay of radiotherapy. Many of these strategies are still under investigation but highlight the importance of continued pre-clinical and clinical studies evaluating the role of radiotherapy in this era of precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colette J Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Stephanie A Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Yoshimura T, Tamori H, Morii Y, Hashimoto T, Shimizu S, Ogasawara K. Cost-effectiveness analysis using lifetime attributable risk of proton beam therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma in Japan. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021:rrab077. [PMID: 34590123 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Compared to conventional X-ray therapy, proton beam therapy (PBT) has more clinical and physical advantages such as irradiation dose reduction to normal tissues for pediatric medulloblastoma. However, PBT is expensive. We aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of PBT for pediatric medulloblastoma with that of conventional X-ray therapy, while focusing on radiation-induced secondary cancers, which are rare, serious and negatively affect a patient's quality of life (QOL). Based on a systematic review, a decision tree model was used for the cost-effectiveness analysis. This analysis was performed from the perspective of health care payers; the cost was estimated from medical fees. The target population was pediatric patients with medulloblastoma below 14 years old. The time horizon was set at 7.7 years after medulloblastoma treatment. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which was defined as the ratio of the difference in cost and lifetime attributable risk (LAR) between conventional X-ray therapy and PBT. The discount rate was set at 2% annually. Sensitivity analyses were performed to model uncertainty. Cost and LAR in conventional X-ray therapy and PBT were Japanese yen (JPY) 1 067 608 and JPY 2436061 and 42% and 7%, respectively. The ICER was JPY 3856398/LAR. In conclusion, PBT is more cost-effective than conventional X-ray therapy in reducing the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers in pediatric medulloblastoma. Thus, our constructed ICER using LAR is one of the valid indicators for cost-effectiveness analysis in radiation-induced secondary cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Yoshimura
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
| | - Honoka Tamori
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Morii
- Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, National Institute of Public Health, Wako 060-0812, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Ogasawara
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Deng MY, Sturm D, Pfaff E, Sill M, Stichel D, Balasubramanian GP, Tippelt S, Kramm C, Donson AM, Green AL, Jones C, Schittenhelm J, Ebinger M, Schuhmann MU, Jones BC, van Tilburg CM, Wittmann A, Golanov A, Ryzhova M, Ecker J, Milde T, Witt O, Sahm F, Reuss D, Sumerauer D, Zamecnik J, Korshunov A, von Deimling A, Pfister SM, Jones DTW. Radiation-induced gliomas represent H3-/IDH-wild type pediatric gliomas with recurrent PDGFRA amplification and loss of CDKN2A/B. Nat Commun 2021; 12:5530. [PMID: 34545083 PMCID: PMC8452680 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25708-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Long-term complications such as radiation-induced second malignancies occur in a subset of patients following radiation-therapy, particularly relevant in pediatric patients due to the long follow-up period in case of survival. Radiation-induced gliomas (RIGs) have been reported in patients after treatment with cranial irradiation for various primary malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and medulloblastoma (MB). We perform comprehensive (epi-) genetic and expression profiling of RIGs arising after cranial irradiation for MB (n = 23) and ALL (n = 9). Our study reveals a unifying molecular signature for the majority of RIGs, with recurrent PDGFRA amplification and loss of CDKN2A/B and an absence of somatic hotspot mutations in genes encoding histone 3 variants or IDH1/2, uncovering diagnostic markers and potentially actionable targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Y Deng
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dominik Sturm
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elke Pfaff
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Sill
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Damian Stichel
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gnana Prakash Balasubramanian
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Tippelt
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Christof Kramm
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Andrew M Donson
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Adam L Green
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Chris Jones
- Division of Molecular Pathology and Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Ebinger
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Children's University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin U Schuhmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Barbara C Jones
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelis M van Tilburg
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Pediatric Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Wittmann
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrey Golanov
- Department of Neuropathology, NN Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marina Ryzhova
- Department of Neuropathology, NN Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Jonas Ecker
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Pediatric Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Till Milde
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Pediatric Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olaf Witt
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Pediatric Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Reuss
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Sumerauer
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Motol University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Josef Zamecnik
- Department of Pathology, Motol University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andrey Korshunov
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan M Pfister
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David T W Jones
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Resarch Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Child AE, Warren EA, Grosshans DR, Paulino AC, Okcu MF, Ris MD, Mahajan A, Orobio J, Cirino PT, Minard CG, Viana AG, Bick J, Woods SP, Chintagumpala M, Kahalley LS. Long-term cognitive and academic outcomes among pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e29125. [PMID: 34114294 PMCID: PMC8316321 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PRT) may be associated with less neurocognitive risk than photon RT (XRT) for pediatric brain tumor survivors. We compared neurocognitive and academic outcomes in long-term survivors treated with XRT versus PRT. METHODS Survivors underwent neurocognitive evaluation >1 year after craniospinal (CSI) or focal PRT or XRT. Groups were compared using separate one-way analyses of covariance for the CSI and focal groups. RESULTS PRT (n = 58) and XRT (n = 30) subgroups were similar on gender (66% male), age at RT (median = 6.5 years), age at follow-up (median = 14.6 years), and government assistance status (32%). PRT and XRT focal groups differed on follow-up interval, shunt history, and total RT dose (all p < .05), whereas PRT and XRT CSI groups differed on follow-up interval, baseline neurocognitive performance score, boost volume, and CSI dose (all p < .05). The PRT focal group outperformed the XRT focal group on inhibition/switching (p = .04). The PRT CSI group outperformed the XRT CSI group on inattention/impulsivity (both p < .05). Several clinical variables (i.e., RT dose, boost field, baseline performance) predicted neurocognitive outcomes (all p < .05). The PRT focal group performed comparably to population means on most neurocognitive measures, while both CSI groups performed below expectation on multiple measures. The XRT CSI group was most impaired. All groups fell below expectation on processing speed, fine motor, and academic fluency (most p < .01). CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest generally favorable neurocognitive and academic long-term outcomes following focal PRT. Impairment was greatest following CSI regardless of modality. Dosimetry and baseline characteristics are important determinants of outcome alone or in combination with modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E. Child
- Department of Neuropsychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore MD
| | - Emily A. Warren
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - David R. Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Arnold C. Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - M. Fatih Okcu
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - M. Douglas Ris
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN
| | - Jessica Orobio
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas TX
| | | | - Charles G. Minard
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | | | | | | | - Murali Chintagumpala
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Lisa S. Kahalley
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Bär E, Collins-Fekete CA, Rompokos V, Zhang Y, Gaze MN, Warry A, Poynter A, Royle G. Assessment of the impact of CT calibration procedures for proton therapy planning on pediatric treatments. Med Phys 2021; 48:5202-5218. [PMID: 34174092 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Relative stopping powers (RSPs) for proton therapy are estimated using single-energy computed tomography (SECT), calibrated with standardized tissues of the adult male. It is assumed that those tissues are representative of tissues of all age and sex. Female, male, and pediatric tissues differ from one another in density and composition. In this study, we use tabulated pediatric tissues and computational phantoms to investigate the impact of this assumption on pediatric proton therapy. The potential of dual-energy CT (DECT) to improve the accuracy of these calculations is explored. METHODS We study 51 human body tissues, categorized into male/female for the age groups newborn, 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year-old children, and adult, with given compositions and densities. CT numbers are simulated and RSPs are estimated using SECT and DECT methods. Estimated tissue RSPs from each method are compared to theoretical RSPs. The dose and range errors of each approach are evaluated on three computational phantoms (Ewing's sarcoma, salivary sarcoma, and glioma) derived from pediatric proton therapy patients. RESULTS With SECT, soft tissues have mean estimation errors and standard deviation up to (1.96 ± 4.18)% observed in newborns, compared to (0.20 ± 1.15)% in adult males. Mean estimation errors for bones are up to (-3.35 ± 4.76)% in pediatrics as opposed to (0.10 ± 0.66)% in adult males. With DECT, mean errors reduce to (0.17 ± 0.13)% and (0.23 ± 0.22)% in newborns (soft tissues/bones). With SECT, dose errors in a Ewing's sarcoma phantom are exceeding 5 Gy (10% of prescribed dose) at the distal end of the treatment field, with volumes of dose errors >5 Gy ofV diff > 5 = 4630.7 mm3 . Similar observations are made in the head and neck phantoms, with overdoses to healthy tissue exceeding 2 Gy (4%). A systematic Bragg peak shift resulting in either over- or underdosage of healthy tissues and target volumes depending on the crossed tissues RSP prediction errors is observed. Water equivalent range errors of single beams are between -1.53 and 5.50 mm (min, max) (Ewing's sarcoma phantom), -0.78 and 3.62 mm (salivary sarcoma phantom), and -0.43 and 1.41 mm (glioma phantom). DECT can reduce dose errors to <1 Gy and range errors to <1 mm. CONCLUSION Single-energy computed tomography estimates RSPs for pediatric tissues with systematic shifts. DECT improves the accuracy of RSPs and dose distributions in pediatric tissues compared to the SECT calibration curve based on adult male tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Bär
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Vasilis Rompokos
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark N Gaze
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alison Warry
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Poynter
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gary Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Heitzer AM, Kahalley LS, Minard CG, Stafford C, Grosshans DR, Okcu MF, Raghubar KP, Gragert M, McCurdy M, Warren EH, Gomez J, Ris MD, Paulino AC, Chintagumpala M. Treatment age and neurocognitive outcomes following proton beam radiotherapy for pediatric low- and intermediate-grade gliomas. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e29096. [PMID: 34019329 PMCID: PMC9040342 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The relationship between age and neurocognitive functioning following proton beam radiotherapy (PRT) in low- and intermediate-grade gliomas (LIGG) has yet to be examined. Eighteen LIGG patients treated with PRT were prospectively enrolled and received annual neurocognitive evaluations of perceptual/verbal reasoning, working memory, and processing speed postradiotherapy. The median age at diagnosis was 8.2 years (range 1.0-14.7) and the median age at PRT was 9.9 years (range 4.2-17.0). Patients' neurocognitive performance did not change on any measure following PRT (p ≥ .142). We did not observe significant changes in cognitive function over time among a small group of LIGG patients treated with PRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M. Heitzer
- Psychology Department, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Lisa S. Kahalley
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Charles G. Minard
- Dan L. Duncan Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Claire Stafford
- Psychology Department, Macalester College, St. Paul, Minnesota
| | - David R. Grosshans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - M. Fatih Okcu
- Texas Children’s Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Kimberly P. Raghubar
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Marsha Gragert
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Mark McCurdy
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Emily H. Warren
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Jocelyn Gomez
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - M. Douglas Ris
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX
| | - Arnold C. Paulino
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
68
|
Grassberger C, Shinnick D, Yeap BY, Tracy M, G Ellsworth S, Hess CB, Weyman EA, Gallotto SL, Lawell MP, Bajaj B, Ebb DH, Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Loeffler JS, MacDonald SM, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI. Circulating Lymphocyte Counts Early During Radiation Therapy Are Associated With Recurrence in Pediatric Medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1044-1052. [PMID: 33556478 PMCID: PMC8238781 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Decreased peripheral lymphocyte counts are associated with survival after radiation therapy (RT) in several solid tumors, although they appear late during or after the radiation course and often correlate with other clinical factors. Here we investigate if absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) are independently associated with recurrence in pediatric medulloblastoma early during RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS We assessed 202 patients with medulloblastoma treated between 2000 and 2016 and analyzed ALC throughout therapy, focusing on both early markers (ALC during week 1 - ALCwk1; grade 3+ Lymphopenia during week 2 - Lymphopeniawk2) and late markers (ALC nadir). Uni- and multivariable regressions were used to assess association of clinical and treatment variables with ALC and of ALC with recurrence. RESULTS Thirty-six recurrences were observed, with a median time to recurrence of 1.6 years (range, 0.2-10.3) and 7.1 years median follow-up. ALC during RT was associated with induction chemotherapy (P < .001), concurrent carboplatin (P = .009), age (P = .01), and high-risk status (P = .05). On univariable analysis, high-risk disease (hazard ratio = 2.0 [1.06-3.9]; P = .03) and M stage≥1 (hazard ratio = 2.2 [1.1-4.4]) were associated with recurrence risk, as was lower ALC early during RT (ALCwk1, hazard ratio = 0.28 [0.12-0.65]; P = .003; Lymphopeniawk2, hazard ratio = 2.27 [1.1-4.6]; P = .02). Neither baseline ALC nor nadir correlated with outcome. These associations persisted when excluding carboplatin and pre-RT chemotherapy patients, and in the multivariable analysis accounting for confounders lymphocyte counts remained significant (ALCwk1, hazard-ratio = 0.23 [0.09-0.57]; P = .002; Lymphopeniawk2, hazard-ratio = 2.3 [1.1-4.8]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS ALC during weeks 1 and 2 of RT was associated with recurrence, and low ALC is an independent prognostic factor in medulloblastoma. Strategies to mitigate the risk of radiation-induced lymphopenia should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Daniel Shinnick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beow Y Yeap
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mark Tracy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Susannah G Ellsworth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Clayton B Hess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth A Weyman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara L Gallotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Miranda P Lawell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Benjamin Bajaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David H Ebb
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Myrsini Ioakeim-Ioannidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jay S Loeffler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Paulino AC, Ludmir EB, Grosshans DR, Su JM, McGovern SL, Okcu MF, McAleer MF, Baxter PA, Mahajan A, Chintagumpala MM. Overall survival and secondary malignant neoplasms in children receiving passively scattered proton or photon craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma. Cancer 2021; 127:3865-3871. [PMID: 34254296 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT) and passively scattered proton therapy have a risk of secondary malignant neoplasm (SMN) in children. To determine the influence of RT modality on the incidence of SMN after craniospinal irradiation (CSI), the authors compared the incidence of SMN in children who had medulloblastoma treated with either photon CSI plus an intensity-modulated RT boost (group I) or passively scattered proton CSI plus a boost (group II). METHODS From 1996 to 2014, 115 children with medulloblastoma (group I, n = 63; group II, n = 52) received CSI followed by a boost to the tumor bed. Most patients had standard-risk disease (63.5%). The median follow-up was 12.8 years for group I and 8.7 years for group II. RESULTS The 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 88.8% and 85.1%, respectively, for standard-risk patients and 63.1% and 57.3%, respectively, for high-risk patients, with no OS difference by RT modality (P = .81). Six SMNs were identified (4 in group I, 2 in group II). The 5-year and 10-year SMN incidence rates were 1.0% and 6.9%, respectively (0.0% and 8.0%, respectively, in group I; 2.2% and 4.9%, respectively, in group II; P = .74). Two SMNs occurred in the clinical target volume in the brain, 2 occurred in the exit dose region from the photon spinal field, 1 occurred in the entrance path of a proton beam, and 1 occurred outside the radiation field. There were no reported cases of secondary leukemia. CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrates no difference in OS or SMN incidence between patients in groups I and II 10 years after RT. LAY SUMMARY One hundred fifteen children with medulloblastoma received radiotherapy (RT) with either photon craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and an intensity-modulated RT boost (group I; n = 63) or passively scattered proton CSI and a boost (group II;, n = 52). The majority of children had standard-risk disease (63.5%). The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 88.8% and 85.1% for standard-risk patients, respectively, and 63.1% and 57.3% for high-risk patients, respectively, with no difference in overall survival by RT group (P = .81). The 5-year and 10-year second malignant neoplasm incidence rates were 1.0% and 6.9%, respectively, with no difference in second malignant neoplasm incidence according to RT group (P = .74).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jack M Su
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - M Fatih Okcu
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patricia A Baxter
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Murali M Chintagumpala
- Texas Children's Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Eaton BR, Fong GW, Ingerski LM, Pulsifer MB, Goyal S, Zhang C, Weyman EA, Esiashvili N, Klosky JL, MacDonald TJ, Ebb DH, MacDonald SM, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI. Intellectual functioning among case-matched cohorts of children treated with proton or photon radiation for standard-risk medulloblastoma. Cancer 2021; 127:3840-3846. [PMID: 34255345 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton therapy may reduce cognitive deficits after radiotherapy among brain tumor survivors, although current data are limited to retrospective comparisons between historical cohorts. The authors compared intelligence quotient scores within a case-matched cohort of children with medulloblastoma treated with proton radiation (PRT) or photon radiation (XRT) over the same time period. METHODS Among 88 consecutive patients with standard-risk medulloblastoma treated with PRT or XRT at 2 institutions from 2000 to 2009, 50 were matched 1:1 (25 with PRT and 25 with XRT) according to age, gender, date of diagnosis, histology, radiation boost, and craniospinal irradiation dose. One-way analyses of variance were performed to compare the Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) and associated index scores between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS Neurocognitive data were available for 37 survivors (17 with PRT and 20 with XRT) from the matched cohort. The mean age was 8.5 years (SD, 4.14 years). The median follow-up was 5.3 years (range, 1.0-11.4 years) and 4.6 years (range, 1.1-11.2 years) for the PRT and XRT cohorts, respectively (P = .193). Patients treated with PRT had significantly higher mean FSIQ (99.6 vs 86.2; P = .021), verbal (105.2 vs 88.6; P = .010), and nonverbal scores (103.1 vs 88.9; P = .011) than the XRT-treated cohort. Differences in processing speed (82.9 vs 77.2; P = .331) and working memory (97.0 vs 92.7; P = .388) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy-associated cognitive effects appear to be more attenuated after proton therapy. Comprehensive prospective studies are needed to appropriately evaluate the neurocognitive advantages of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bree R Eaton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Grace W Fong
- Department of Psychology, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lisa M Ingerski
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.,Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Margaret B Pulsifer
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Subir Goyal
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Chao Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Elizabeth A Weyman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Natia Esiashvili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - James L Klosky
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.,Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tobey J MacDonald
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.,Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David H Ebb
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Chandra RA, Keane FK, Voncken FEM, Thomas CR. Contemporary radiotherapy: present and future. Lancet 2021; 398:171-184. [PMID: 34166607 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00233-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Oncology care is increasingly a multidisciplinary endeavour, and radiation therapy continues to have a key role across the disease spectrum in nearly every cancer. However, the field of radiation oncology is still one of the most poorly understood of the cancer disciplines. In this Review, we attempt to summarise and contextualise developments within the field of radiation oncology for the non-radiation oncologist. We discuss advancements in treatment technologies and imaging, followed by an overview of the interplay with advancements in systemic therapy and surgical techniques. Finally, we review new frontiers in radiation oncology, including advances within the metastatic disease continuum, reirradiation, and emerging types of radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi A Chandra
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Florence K Keane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Francine E M Voncken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Hau P, Frappaz D, Hovey E, McCabe MG, Pajtler KW, Wiestler B, Seidel C, Combs SE, Dirven L, Klein M, Anazodo A, Hattingen E, Hofer S, Pfister SM, Zimmer C, Kortmann RD, Sunyach MP, Tanguy R, Effeney R, von Deimling A, Sahm F, Rutkowski S, Berghoff AS, Franceschi E, Pineda E, Beier D, Peeters E, Gorlia T, Vanlancker M, Bromberg JEC, Gautier J, Ziegler DS, Preusser M, Wick W, Weller M. Development of Randomized Trials in Adults with Medulloblastoma-The Example of EORTC 1634-BTG/NOA-23. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143451. [PMID: 34298664 PMCID: PMC8303185 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Medulloblastoma is rare after puberty. Among several molecular subgroups that have been described, the sonic hedgehog (SHH) subgroup is highly overrepresented in the post-pubertal population and can be targeted with smoothened (SMO) inhibitors. However, no practice-changing prospective clinical trials have been published in adults to date. Tumors often recur, and treatment toxicity is relevant. Thus, the EORTC 1634-BTG/NOA-23 trial for post-pubertal patients with standard risk medulloblastoma will aim to increase treatment efficacy and to decrease treatment toxicity. Patients will be randomized between standard-dose vs. reduced-dosed radiotherapy, and SHH-subgroup patients will also be randomized between the SMO inhibitor sonidegib (OdomzoTM,, Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc., New York, USA) in addition to standard radio-chemotherapy vs. standard radio-chemotherapy alone. In ancillary studies, we will investigate tumor tissue, blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples, magnetic resonance images, and radiotherapy plans to gain information that may improve future treatment. Patients will also be monitored long-term for late side effects of therapy, health-related quality of life, cognitive function, social and professional live outcomes, and reproduction and fertility. In summary, EORTC 1634-BTG/NOA-23 is a unique multi-national effort that will help to council patients and clinical scientists for the appropriate design of treatments and future clinical trials for post-pubertal patients with medulloblastoma. Abstract Medulloblastoma is a rare brain malignancy. Patients after puberty are rare and bear an intermediate prognosis. Standard treatment consists of maximal resection plus radio-chemotherapy. Treatment toxicity is high and produces disabling long-term side effects. The sonic hedgehog (SHH) subgroup is highly overrepresented in the post-pubertal and adult population and can be targeted by smoothened (SMO) inhibitors. No practice-changing prospective randomized data have been generated in adults. The EORTC 1634-BTG/NOA-23 trial will randomize patients between standard-dose vs. reduced-dosed craniospinal radiotherapy and SHH-subgroup patients between the SMO inhibitor sonidegib (OdomzoTM, Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc., New York, USA) in addition to standard radio-chemotherapy vs. standard radio-chemotherapy alone to improve outcomes in view of decreased radiotherapy-related toxicity and increased efficacy. We will further investigate tumor tissue, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid as well as magnetic resonance imaging and radiotherapy plans to generate information that helps to further improve treatment outcomes. Given that treatment side effects typically occur late, long-term follow-up will monitor classic side effects of therapy, but also health-related quality of life, cognition, social and professional outcome, and reproduction and fertility. In summary, we will generate unprecedented data that will be translated into treatment changes in post-pubertal patients with medulloblastoma and will help to design future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hau
- Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-941-944-18750
| | - Didier Frappaz
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Elizabeth Hovey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sydney 2052, Australia;
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney 2031, Australia;
| | - Martin G. McCabe
- Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK;
| | - Kristian W. Pajtler
- Hopp-Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.W.P.); (S.M.P.)
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, TUM School of Medicine, 81675 Munich, Germany; (B.W.); (C.Z.)
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (C.S.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, TUM School of Medicine, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands;
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2501 CK The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Klein
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam at Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney 2031, Australia;
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney 2031, Australia;
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany;
| | - Silvia Hofer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.H.); (M.W.)
| | - Stefan M. Pfister
- Hopp-Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.W.P.); (S.M.P.)
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, TUM School of Medicine, 81675 Munich, Germany; (B.W.); (C.Z.)
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (C.S.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Marie-Pierre Sunyach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, 69008 Lyon, France; (M.-P.S.); (R.T.)
| | - Ronan Tanguy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, 69008 Lyon, France; (M.-P.S.); (R.T.)
| | - Rachel Effeney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane 4029, Australia;
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.v.D.); (F.S.)
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.v.D.); (F.S.)
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Anna S. Berghoff
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (A.S.B.); (M.P.)
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Medical Oncology Department, Azienda USL/IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Estela Pineda
- Barcelona Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors Group, Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Dagmar Beier
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
| | - Ellen Peeters
- EORTC Headquarters, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (E.P.); (T.G.); (M.V.)
| | - Thierry Gorlia
- EORTC Headquarters, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (E.P.); (T.G.); (M.V.)
| | | | - Jacoline E. C. Bromberg
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Department of Neuro-Oncology, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Julien Gautier
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - David S. Ziegler
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney 2031, Australia;
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia
- Children’s Cancer Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (A.S.B.); (M.P.)
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.H.); (M.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Normal tissue tolerance amongst paediatric brain tumour patients- current evidence in proton radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 164:103415. [PMID: 34242771 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PT) is used increasingly for paediatric brain cancer patients. However, as demonstrated here, the knowledge on normal tissue dose constraints, to minimize side-effects, for this cohort is limited. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on MEDLINE® database. 65 papers were evaluated ranging from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS Large variations in normal tissue tolerance and toxicity reporting across PT studies makes estimation of normal tissue dose constraints difficult, with the potential for significant late effects to go unmeasured. Mean dose delivered to the pituitary gland varies from 20 to 30 Gy across literature. Similarly, the hypothalamic dose delivery ranges from 20 to 54.6 Gy for paediatric patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant lack of radiobiological data for paediatric brain cancer patients undergoing proton therapy, often using data from x-ray radiotherapy and adult populations. The way forward is through standardisation of reporting in order to validate relevant dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Kim KS, Wu HG. Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy? Cancer Res Treat 2021; 53:621-634. [PMID: 34176253 PMCID: PMC8291184 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Charged-particle therapy (CPT) such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) exhibit substantial physical and biological advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy. As it can reduce the amount of radiation irradiated in the normal organ, CPT has been mainly applied to pediatric cancer and radioresistent tumors in the eloquent area. Although there is a possibility of greater benefits, high set-up cost and dearth of high level of clinical evidence hinder wide applications of CPT. This review aims to present recent clinical results of PBT and CIRT in selected diseases focusing on possible indications of CPT. We also discussed how clinical studies are conducted to increase the number of patients who can benefit from CPT despite its high cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Su Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hong-Gyun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul,
Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Li Q, Dong Z, Chen M, Feng L. Phenolic molecules constructed nanomedicine for innovative cancer treatment. Coord Chem Rev 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
76
|
Franceschi E, Seidel C, Sahm F, Pajtler KW, Hau P. How we treat medulloblastoma in adults. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100173. [PMID: 34118771 PMCID: PMC8207184 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E Franceschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL/IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy
| | - C Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig
| | - F Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg; CCU Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg
| | - K W Pajtler
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg
| | - P Hau
- Wilhelm Sander NeuroOncology Unit & Department of Neurology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Paul MR, Zage PE. Overview and recent advances in the targeting of medulloblastoma cancer stem cells. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21:957-974. [PMID: 34047251 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1932472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Medulloblastoma, an embryonal small round blue cell tumor primarily arising in the posterior fossa, is the most common malignancy of the central nervous system in children and requires intensive multi-modality therapy for cure. Overall 5-year survival is approximately 75% in children with primary disease, but outcomes for relapsed disease are very poor. Recent advances have identified molecular subgroups with excellent prognosis, with 5-year overall survival rates >90%, and subgroups with very poor prognosis with overall survival rates <50%. Molecular subtyping has allowed for more sophisticated risk stratification of patients, but new treatments for the highest risk patients have not yet improved outcomes. Targeting cancer stem cells may improve outcomes, and several candidate targets and novel drugs are under investigation.Areas covered: We discuss medulloblastoma epidemiology, biology, treatment modalities, risk stratification, and molecular subgroup analysis, links between subgroup and developmental biology, cancer stem cell biology in medulloblastoma including previously described cancer stem cell markers and proposed targeted treatments in the current literature.Expert opinion: The understanding of cancer stem cells in medulloblastoma will advance therapies targeting the most treatment-resistant cells within the tumor and therefore reduce the incidence of treatment refractory and relapsed disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Rose Paul
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA (M.R.P., P.E.Z.); Peckham Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Peter E Zage
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA (M.R.P., P.E.Z.); Peckham Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Baliga S, Gandola L, Timmermann B, Gail H, Padovani L, Janssens GO, Yock TI. Brain tumors: Medulloblastoma, ATRT, ependymoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28395. [PMID: 32386126 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Children with medulloblastoma, atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), and ependymoma are treated with a multidisciplinary approach including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Lower doses of craniospinal irradiation and tumor bed boost together with chemotherapy are the current standard of care for average-risk medulloblastoma in the Children's Oncology Group (COG). The International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) is examining the role of hyperfractionated craniospinal irradiation and chemotherapy in high-risk patients. The recent stratification of medulloblastoma into specific molecular risk groups has prompted both COG and SIOP to reexamine the role of these modalities in these different risk groups to maximize cure rates and minimize long-term complications. Proton therapy has shown lower rates of neurocognitive and endocrine complications compared with photons. Ependymomas are treated with maximal surgical resection and adjuvant radiation therapy. The role of chemotherapy in ependymoma is currently being studied in both COG and SIOP. Likewise, for ATRT the role of different high-dose chemotherapy regimens together with local radiation therapy in infants, or craniospinal radiation in older children, is the current focus of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujith Baliga
- Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center-The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Lorenza Gandola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Horan Gail
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Laetitia Padovani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center and Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Eaton BR, Goldberg S, Tarbell NJ, Lawell MP, Gallotto SL, Weyman EA, Kuhlthau KA, Ebb DH, MacDonald SM, Yock TI. Long-term health-related quality of life in pediatric brain tumor survivors receiving proton radiotherapy at <4 years of age. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:1379-1387. [PMID: 32064512 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this analysis is to report long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among brain tumor survivors treated with proton therapy (PRT) at a very young age. METHODS Fifty-nine children <4 years old received PRT between 2000 and 2011. Forty families participated. HRQoL was assessed by child self-report (CSR; age ≥5) and parent proxy report (PPR; age 2+) using the PedsQL Core. RESULTS The median age was 2.5 years (range, 0.3-3.8) at PRT and 9.1 years (5.5-18) at last follow-up. The most common diagnoses were ependymoma (n = 22) and medulloblastoma (n = 7). Median follow-up is 6.7 years (3-15.4). Follow-up mean CSR and PPR scores were: total core (78.4 and 72.9), physical (82.9 and 75.2), psychosocial (76.0 and 71.6), emotional (74.4 and 70.7), social (81.2 and 75.1), and school (72.4 and 69.9). Parent-reported HRQoL fell within a previously defined range for healthy children in 37.5% of patients, and for children with severe health conditions in 45% of patients. PPR HRQoL was stable from baseline to last follow-up among all domains except for social functioning. History of gastrostomy tube was significantly associated with poorer CSR and PPR HRQoL on multivariable analysis. Ninety percent of children functioned in a regular classroom, 14 (36%) used a classroom aid, 9 (23%) used an outside tutor, and 18 (46%) had an individualized education plan. CONCLUSION Long-term HRQoL among brain tumor survivors treated with PRT at a very young age is variable, with over a third achieving HRQoL levels commensurate with healthy children. KEY POINTS 1. One third of survivors reported long-term HRQoL scores comparable to those of healthy children.2. Treatment for hydrocephalus or a feeding tube was associated with significantly lower HRQoL.3. Total core HRQoL scores remained stable from baseline to last follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bree R Eaton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Saveli Goldberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Miranda P Lawell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara L Gallotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth A Weyman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen A Kuhlthau
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David H Ebb
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Mizumoto M, Fuji H, Miyachi M, Soejima T, Yamamoto T, Aibe N, Demizu Y, Iwata H, Hashimoto T, Motegi A, Kawamura A, Terashima K, Fukushima T, Nakao T, Takada A, Sumi M, Oshima J, Moriwaki K, Nozaki M, Ishida Y, Kosaka Y, Ae K, Hosono A, Harada H, Ogo E, Akimoto T, Saito T, Fukushima H, Suzuki R, Takahashi M, Matsuo T, Matsumura A, Masaki H, Hosoi H, Shigematsu N, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs): JASTRO and JSPHO Guidelines. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 98:102209. [PMID: 33984606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are often treated with a multidisciplinary approach. This includes use of radiotherapy, which is important for local control, but may also cause adverse events in the long term, including second cancer. The risks for limited growth and development, endocrine dysfunction, reduced fertility and second cancer in children and AYAs are reduced by proton beam therapy (PBT), which has a dose distribution that decreases irradiation of normal organs while still targeting the tumor. To define the outcomes and characteristics of PBT in cancer treatment in pediatric and AYA patients, this document was developed by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- Department of Radiology and National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshinori Soejima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Yamamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsufumi Kawamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keita Terashima
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukushima
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomohei Nakao
- Department of Pediatrics, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akinori Takada
- Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan
| | - Minako Sumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Moriwaki
- Department of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Miwako Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuji Ishida
- Department of Pediatrics, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kosaka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ako Hosono
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Division of Radiation Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukushima
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akira Matsumura
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Masaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Hajime Hosoi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Shigematsu
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Leduc A, Chaouni S, Pouzoulet F, De Marzi L, Megnin-Chanet F, Corre E, Stefan D, Habrand JL, Sichel F, Laurent C. Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5876. [PMID: 33712719 PMCID: PMC7955113 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85394-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy allows to avoid excess radiation dose on normal tissues. However, there are some limitations. Indeed, passive delivery of proton beams results in an increase in the lateral dose upstream of the tumor and active scanning leads to strong differences in dose delivery. This study aims to assess possible differences in the transcriptomic response of skin in C57BL/6 mice after TBI irradiation by active or passive proton beams at the dose of 6 Gy compared to unirradiated mice. In that purpose, total RNA was extracted from skin samples 3 months after irradiation and RNA-Seq was performed. Results showed that active and passive delivery lead to completely different transcription profiles. Indeed, 140 and 167 genes were differentially expressed after active and passive scanning compared to unirradiated, respectively, with only one common gene corresponding to RIKEN cDNA 9930021J03. Moreover, protein-protein interactions performed by STRING analysis showed that 31 and 25 genes are functionally related after active and passive delivery, respectively, with no common gene between both types of proton delivery. Analysis showed that active scanning led to the regulation of genes involved in skin development which was not the case with passive delivery. Moreover, 14 ncRNA were differentially regulated after active scanning against none for passive delivery. Active scanning led to 49 potential mRNA-ncRNA pairs with one ncRNA mainly involved, Gm44383 which is a miRNA. The 43 genes potentially regulated by the miRNA Gm44393 confirmed an important role of active scanning on skin keratin pathway. Our results demonstrated that there are differences in skin gene expression still 3 months after proton irradiation versus unirradiated mouse skin. And strong differences do exist in late skin gene expression between scattered or scanned proton beams. Further investigations are strongly needed to understand this discrepancy and to improve treatments by proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Leduc
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Samia Chaouni
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, RadeXp Platform, centre universitaire, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie, INSERM, 91401, Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Frédérique Megnin-Chanet
- INSERM U1196/UMR9187 CMIB, University Paris-Saclay, Institut Curie-Recherche, bât. 112, rue H. Becquerel, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Erwan Corre
- CNRS, Sorbonne Université, R2424, ABiMS platform, Station Biologique, 29680, Roscoff, France
| | - Dinu Stefan
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
- Radiotherapy Department, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Jean-Louis Habrand
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
- Radiotherapy Department, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - François Sichel
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Carine Laurent
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France.
- SAPHYN/ARCHADE (Advanced Resource Centre for HADrontherapy in Europe), Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Seidensaal K, Mattke M, Haufe S, Rathke H, Haberkorn U, Bougatf N, Kudak A, Blattmann C, Oertel S, Kirchner M, Buesch C, Kieser M, Herfarth K, Kulozik A, Debus J, Uhl M, Harrabi SB. The role of combined ion-beam radiotherapy (CIBRT) with protons and carbon ions in a multimodal treatment strategy of inoperable osteosarcoma. Radiother Oncol 2021; 159:8-16. [PMID: 33549644 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the role of combined ion-beam radiotherapy (CIBRT) with protons and carbon ions in a multimodal treatment strategy of inoperable osteosarcoma; final analysis of a one-armed, single center phase I/II trial. METHODS Between August 2011 until September 2018, 20 patients with primary (N = 18), metastatic (N = 3), or recurrent (N = 2) inoperable pelvic (70%) or craniofacial (30%) osteosarcoma were treated with protons up to 54 Gy (RBE) and a carbon ion boost of 18 Gy (RBE) and followed until May 2019. A Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed before CIBRT in search for a prognostic factor. The primary endpoint was toxicity. Secondary endpoints included treatment response, global, local and distant progression free survival (PFS, LPFS and DPFS) and overall (OS), among others. RESULTS The median age was 20; all patients finished treatment per protocol. LPFS, DPFS, PFS and OS were 73%, 74%, 60% and 75% after one year and 55%, 65% 65.3%, 45% and 68% after two years, respectively. The median clinical target volume (CTV) was 1042 cc and 415 cc for the primary and boost plan, respectively. Craniofacial localization, lower uptake of FDG in PET/CT and boost plan CTV ≤ median were associated with improved overall survival (p = 0.039, p = 0.016 and p = 0.0043, respectively). No acute toxicities > grade III were observed. We observed one case of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) seven months after CIBRT for recurrent disease and one case of hearing loss. CONCLUSION CIBRT shows a favorable toxicity profile and promising results particularly for patients with inoperable craniofacial osteosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Mattke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine Haufe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Hendrik Rathke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - Nina Bougatf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Andreas Kudak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudia Blattmann
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany; Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Meinhard Kieser
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Andreas Kulozik
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Semi B Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Vogin G, Hettal L, Bartau C, Thariat J, Claeys MV, Peyraga G, Retif P, Schick U, Antoni D, Bodgal Z, Dhermain F, Feuvret L. Cranial organs at risk delineation: heterogenous practices in radiotherapy planning. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:26. [PMID: 33541394 PMCID: PMC7863275 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01756-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Segmentation is a crucial step in treatment planning that directly impacts dose distribution and optimization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-individual variability of common cranial organs at risk (OAR) delineation in neurooncology practice. METHODS Anonymized simulation contrast-enhanced CT and MR scans of one patient with a solitary brain metastasis was used for delineation and analysis. Expert professionals from 16 radiotherapy centers involved in brain structures delineation were asked to segment 9 OAR on their own treatment planning system. As reference, two experts in neurooncology, produced a unique consensual contour set according to guidelines. Overlap ratio, Kappa index (KI), volumetric ratio, Commonly Contoured Volume, Supplementary Contoured Volume were evaluated using Artiview™ v 2.8.2-according to occupation, seniority and level of expertise of all participants. RESULTS For the most frequently delineated and largest OAR, the mean KI are often good (0.8 for the parotid and the brainstem); however, for the smaller OAR, KI degrade (0.3 for the optic chiasm, 0.5% for the cochlea), with a significant discrimination (p < 0.01). The radiation oncologists, members of Association des Neuro-Oncologue d'Expression Française society performed better in all indicators compared to non-members (p < 0.01). Our exercise was effective in separating the different participating centers with 3 of the reported indicators (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Our study illustrates the heterogeneity in normal structures contouring between professionals. We emphasize the need for cerebral OAR delineation harmonization-that is a major determinant of therapeutic ratio and clinical trials evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Vogin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
- IMoPA, UMR 7365 CNRS-Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
- Centre National de radiothérapie du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Centre François Baclesse, Boîte postale 436, 4005 Esch sur Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Liza Hettal
- IMoPA, UMR 7365 CNRS-Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | - Clarisse Bartau
- Aquilab SAS, Parc Eurasanté - 250 rue Salvador Allende, Loos, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Département de Radiothérapie, Centre François Baclesse/ARCHADE, 3 Av General Harris, Caen, France
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN - UMR6534 - Unicaen, Normandie Université, Caen, France
| | | | - Guillaume Peyraga
- Service de Radiothérapie, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (Oncopole), Toulouse, France
| | - Paul Retif
- Service de Radiothérapie, CHR de Metz-Thionville Site Mercy, Metz, France
| | - Ulrike Schick
- Département de radiothérapie, CHU de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Delphine Antoni
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - Zsuzsa Bodgal
- Centre National de radiothérapie du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Centre François Baclesse, Boîte postale 436, 4005 Esch sur Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Frederic Dhermain
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy University Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Loic Feuvret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Benign skull and subdural lesions in patients with prior medulloblastoma therapy. Childs Nerv Syst 2021; 37:359-366. [PMID: 32876801 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04874-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report on our institutional cohort of patients and review the literature of medulloblastoma patients who developed skull/subdural-based lesions following treatment. METHODS Following institutional review board (IRB) approval, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of four children with a history of treated medulloblastoma who developed non-specific skull-based/subdural lesions incidentally found on surveillance imaging. RESULTS Biopsies of the lesions proved the pathology to be low grade and included inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, cortical fibrous defect consistent with fibroma, fibrous tissue, and fibrous dysplasia. The finding of calvarial or subdural fibrous lesions in children following therapy for medulloblastoma was noted in four out of 201 (136 with available follow-up data) medulloblastoma patients seen or discussed in our institution over the past 10 years. CONCLUSIONS These lesions can grow over time and pose a differential diagnostic challenge with metastatic disease when identified. The skull and subdural space should be scrutinized for secondary lesions on surveillance imaging of patients with medulloblastoma who have received craniospinal irradiation as knowledge of this benign occurrence will assist with management.
Collapse
|
85
|
Öztunali A, Elsayad K, Scobioala S, Channaoui M, Haverkamp U, Grauer O, Sträter R, Brentrup A, Stummer W, Kerl K, Eich HT. Toxicity Reduction after Craniospinal Irradiation via Helical Tomotherapy in Patients with Medulloblastoma: A Unicentric Retrospective Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030501. [PMID: 33525583 PMCID: PMC7865289 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Recent trials with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) via helical Tomotherapy (HT) demonstrated encouraging medulloblastoma results. In this study, we assess the toxicity profile of different radiation techniques and estimate survival rates. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of 46 patients who underwent irradiation for medulloblastoma between 1999 and 2019 (27 conventional radiotherapy technique (CRT) and 19 HT). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, as well as treatment outcomes-local control rate (LCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS)-were reviewed. Acute and late adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) criteria. Results: In total, 43 courses of CSI and three local RT were administered to the 46 patients: 30 were male, the median age was 7 years (range 1-56). A median total RT dose of 55 Gy (range 44-68) and a median CSI dose of 35 Gy (range, 23.4-40) was delivered. During follow-up (median, 99 months), six patients (13%) developed recurrence. The EFS rate after 5 years was 84%. The overall OS rates after 5 and 10 years were 95% and 88%, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Following HT, a trend towards lower grade 2/3 acute upper gastrointestinal (p = 0.07) and subacute CNS (p = 0.05) toxicity rates was detected compared to CRT-group. The risk of late CNS toxicities, mainly grade 2/3, was significantly lower following HT technique (p = 0.003). Conclusion: CSI via HT is an efficacious treatment modality in medulloblastoma patients. In all, we detected a reduced rate of several acute, subacute, and chronic toxicities following HT compared to CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Öztunali
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
| | - Khaled Elsayad
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-0-2518347384
| | - Sergiu Scobioala
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
| | - Mohammed Channaoui
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
| | - Uwe Haverkamp
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
| | - Oliver Grauer
- Neuro-Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany;
| | - Ronald Sträter
- Pediatric Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (R.S.); (K.K.)
| | - Angela Brentrup
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.B.); (W.S.)
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.B.); (W.S.)
| | - Kornelius Kerl
- Pediatric Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (R.S.); (K.K.)
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Liu SM, Brooks ED, Rubin ML, Grosshans DR, Frank SJ, McAleer MF, McGovern SL, Paulino AC, Woodhouse KD. Referral Patterns and Treatment Delays in Medulloblastoma: A Large Academic Proton Center Experience. Int J Part Ther 2020; 7:1-10. [PMID: 33604411 PMCID: PMC7886269 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00038.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patient travel time can cause treatment delays when providers and families decide to seek proton therapy. We examined whether travel distance or referral pattern (domestic versus international) affects time to radiation therapy and subsequent disease outcomes in patients with medulloblastoma at a large academic proton center. Patients and Methods Children with medulloblastoma treated at MD Anderson (MDA) with a protocol of proton beam therapy (PBT) between January 4, 2007, and June 25, 2014, were included in the analysis. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to study the association between time to start of radiation and distance. Classification- and regression-tree analyses were used to explore binary thresholds for continuous covariates (ie, distance). Failure-free survival was defined as the time interval between end of radiation and failure or death. Results 96 patients were included in the analysis: 17 were international (18%); 19 (20%) were from Houston, Texas; 21 were from other cities inside Texas (21%); and 39 (41%) were from other US states. The median time from surgery to start of radiation was not significantly different for international patients (median = 1.45 months) compared with US patients (median = 1.15 months; P = .13). However, time from surgery to start of radiation was significantly longer for patients residing > 1716 km (> 1066 miles) from MDA (median = 1.31 months) than for patients residing ≤ 1716 km (≤ 1066 miles) from MDA (median = 1.05 months; P = .01). This 1- to 2-week delay (median = 7.8 days) did not affect failure-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.34; P = .43). Conclusion We found that short delays in proton access can exist for patients traveling long distances to proton centers. However, in this study, treatment delays did not affect outcomes. This highlights the appropriateness of PBT in the face of travel coordination. Investment by proton centers in a rigorous intake process is justified to offer timely access to curative PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean M Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric D Brooks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - M Laura Rubin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kristina D Woodhouse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Lim PS, Tran S, Kroeze SGC, Pica A, Hrbacek J, Bachtiary B, Walser M, Leiser D, Lomax AJ, Weber DC. Outcomes of adolescents and young adults treated for brain and skull base tumors with pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28664. [PMID: 32881313 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of proton therapy (PT) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is becoming increasingly popular. This study aims to assess the outcomes and late toxicity consequences in AYAs (15-39 years) with brain/skull base tumors treated with pencil beam scanning proton therapy. METHODS One hundred seventy six AYAs treated curatively at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) were identified. Median age was 30 years (range 15-39) and median prescribed dose was 70.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) (range 50.4-76.0). The most common tumors treated were chordomas/chondrosarcomas (61.4%), followed by gliomas (15.3%), and meningiomas (14.2%). RESULTS After a median follow up of 66 months (range 12-236), 24 (13.6%) local only failures and one (0.6%) central nervous system (CNS) distant only failure were observed. The 6-year local control, distant progression-free survival, and overall survival were 83.2%, 97.4%, and 90.2%, respectively. The 6-year high-grade (≥grade [G] 3) PT-related late toxicity-free survival was 88.5%. Crude late toxicity rates were 26.2% G1, 37.8% G2, 12.2% G3, 0.6% G4, and 0.6% G5. The one G4 toxicity was a retinopathy and one G5 toxicity was a brainstem hemorrhage. The 6-year cumulative incidences for any late PT-related pituitary, ototoxicity, and neurotoxicity were 36.3%, 18.3%, and 25.6%; whilst high-grade (≥G3) ototoxicity and neurotoxicity were 3.4% and 2.9%, respectively. No secondary malignancies were observed. The rate of unemployment was 9.5% pre-PT, increasing to 23.8% post-PT. Sixty-two percent of survivors were working whilst 12.7% were in education post-PT. CONCLUSIONS PT is an effective treatment for brain/skull base tumors in the AYA population with a reasonable late toxicity profile. Despite good clinical outcomes, around one in four AYA survivors are unemployed after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei S Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sébastien Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Jan Hrbacek
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Bachtiary
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Marc Walser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Dominic Leiser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Dietzsch S, Braesigk A, Seidel C, Remmele J, Kitzing R, Schlender T, Mynarek M, Geismar D, Jablonska K, Schwarz R, Pazos M, Walser M, Frick S, Gurtner K, Matuschek C, Harrabi SB, Glück A, Lewitzki V, Dieckmann K, Benesch M, Gerber NU, Rutkowski S, Timmermann B, Kortmann RD. Pretreatment central quality control for craniospinal irradiation in non-metastatic medulloblastoma : First experiences of the German radiotherapy quality control panel in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:674-682. [PMID: 33226469 PMCID: PMC8292275 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01707-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Several studies have demonstrated the negative impact of radiotherapy protocol deviations on tumor control in medulloblastoma. In the SIOP PNET5 MB trial, a pretreatment radiotherapy quality control (RT-QC) program was introduced. A first analysis for patients enrolled in Germany, Switzerland and Austria with focus on types of deviations in the initial plan proposals and review criteria for modern radiation technologies was performed. Methods and patients Sixty-nine craniospinal irradiation (CSI) plans were available for detailed analyses. RT-QC was performed according to protocol definitions on dose uniformity. Because of the lack of definitions for high-precision 3D conformal radiotherapy within the protocol, additional criteria for RT-QC on delineation and coverage of clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) were defined and evaluated. Results Target volume (CTV/PTV) deviations occurred in 49.3% of initial CSI plan proposals (33.3% minor, 15.9% major). Dose uniformity deviations were less frequent (43.5%). Modification of the RT plan was recommended in 43.5% of CSI plans. Unacceptable RT plans were predominantly related to incorrect target delineation rather than dose uniformity. Unacceptable plans were negatively correlated to the number of enrolled patients per institution with a cutoff of 5 patients (p = 0.001). Conclusion This prospective pretreatment individual case review study revealed a high rate of deviations and emphasizes the strong need of pretreatment RT-QC in clinical trials for medulloblastoma. Furthermore, the experiences point out the necessity of new RT-QC criteria for high-precision CSI techniques. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-020-01707-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Dietzsch
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Annett Braesigk
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Julia Remmele
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ralf Kitzing
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tina Schlender
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Martin Mynarek
- Departement of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Geismar
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, West German Proton Therapy Centre, University of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Karolina Jablonska
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rudolf Schwarz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Montserrat Pazos
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Walser
- Center for Protontherapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Silke Frick
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hospital Bremen Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Kristin Gurtner
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Albrecht Glück
- Radiation Oncology, Munich-Schwabing Municipal Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Victor Lewitzki
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Benesch
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Departement of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, West German Proton Therapy Centre, University of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Liu KX, Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Susko MS, Rao AD, Yeap BY, Snijders AM, Ladra MM, Vogel J, Zaslowe-Dude C, Marcus KJ, Yock TI, Grassberger C, Braunstein SE, Haas-Kogan DA, Terezakis SA, MacDonald SM. A Multi-institutional Comparative Analysis of Proton and Photon Therapy-Induced Hematologic Toxicity in Patients With Medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:726-735. [PMID: 33243479 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This multi-institutional retrospective study sought to examine the hematologic effects of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma using proton or photon therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Clinical and treatment characteristics were recorded for 97 pediatric patients with medulloblastoma who received CSI without concurrent chemotherapy or with concurrent single-agent vincristine from 2000 to 2017. Groups of 60 and 37 patients underwent treatment with proton-based and photon-based therapy, respectively. Overall survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test. Comparisons of blood counts at each timepoint were conducted using multiple t tests with Bonferroni corrections. Univariate and multivariate analyses of time to grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity were performed with Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Median age of patients receiving proton and photon CSI was 7.5 years (range, 3.5-22.7 years) and 9.9 years (range, 3.6-19.5 years), respectively. Most patients had a diagnosis of standard risk medulloblastoma, with 86.7% and 89.2% for the proton and photon cohorts, respectively. Median total dose to involved field or whole posterior fossa was 54.0 Gy/Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and median CSI dose was 23.4 Gy/Gy(RBE) (range, 18-36 Gy/Gy[RBE]) for both cohorts. Counts were significantly higher in the proton cohort compared with the photon cohort in weeks 3 to 6 of radiation therapy (RT). Although white blood cell counts did not differ between the 2 cohorts, patients receiving proton RT had significantly higher lymphocyte counts throughout the RT course. Similar results were observed when excluding patients who received vertebral body sparing proton RT or limiting to those receiving 23.4 Gy. Only photon therapy was associated with decreased time to grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity on univariate and multivariable analyses. No difference in overall survival was observed, and lymphopenia did not predict survival. CONCLUSIONS Patients who receive CSI using proton therapy experience significantly decreased hematologic toxicity compared with those receiving photon therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin X Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Myrsini Ioakeim-Ioannidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew S Susko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Avani D Rao
- Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Beow Y Yeap
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Antoine M Snijders
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
| | - Matthew M Ladra
- Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer Vogel
- Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Cierra Zaslowe-Dude
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen J Marcus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steve E Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Daphne A Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie A Terezakis
- Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Menyhárt O, Győrffy B. Molecular stratifications, biomarker candidates and new therapeutic options in current medulloblastoma treatment approaches. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2020; 39:211-233. [PMID: 31970590 PMCID: PMC7098941 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-020-09854-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common malignant childhood tumor of the brain. Multimodal treatment consisting of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy reduced cumulative incidence of late mortality but increased the incidence of subsequent neoplasms and severe, incapacitating chronic health conditions. Present treatment strategies fail to recognize heterogeneity within patients despite wide divergence in individual responses. The persistent mortality rates and serious side effects of non-targeted cytotoxic therapies indicate a need for more refined therapeutic approaches. Advanced genomic research has led to the accumulation of an enormous amount of genetic information and resulted in a consensus distinguishing four molecular subgroups, WNT-activated, SHH-activated, and Group 3 and 4 medulloblastomas. These have distinct origin, demographics, molecular alterations, and clinical outcomes. Although subgroup affiliation does not predict response to therapy, new subgroup-specific markers of prognosis can enable a more layered risk stratification with additional subtypes within each primary subgroup. Here, we summarize subgroup-specific genetic alterations and their utility in current treatment strategies. The transition toward molecularly targeted interventions for newly diagnosed MBs remains slow, and prospective trials are needed to confirm stratifications based on molecular alterations. At the same time, numerous studies focus at fine-tuning the intensity of invasive radio- and chemotherapies to reduce intervention-related long-term morbidity. There are an increasing number of immunotherapy-based treatment strategies including immune checkpoint-inhibitors, oncolytic viruses, CAR-T therapy, and NK cells in recurrent and refractory MBs. Although most trials are in early phase, there is hope for therapeutic breakthroughs for advanced MBs within the next decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otília Menyhárt
- 2nd Department of Pediatrics and Department of Bioinformatics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.,Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Cancer Biomarker Research Group, Institute of Enzymology, Magyar tudósok körútja 2, Budapest, H-1117, Hungary
| | - Balázs Győrffy
- 2nd Department of Pediatrics and Department of Bioinformatics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. .,Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Cancer Biomarker Research Group, Institute of Enzymology, Magyar tudósok körútja 2, Budapest, H-1117, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Gajjar A. Medulloblastoma: Improving cure rates in tandem with reduction in short-term toxicities and long-term treatment-related morbidities. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28645. [PMID: 32770625 PMCID: PMC8637651 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amar Gajjar
- Corresponding author: Amar Gajjar, MD, Department of Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children’s Hospital Memphis, TN. Tel: 901-595-4599;
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Chilukuri S, Burela N, Uppuluri R, Indumathi D, Nangia S, Panda PK, Shamurailatpam DS, Raj R, Raja T, Jalali R. Preliminary Experience of Treating Children and Young Adults With Image-Guided Proton Beam Therapy in India. JCO Glob Oncol 2020; 6:1736-1745. [PMID: 33180633 PMCID: PMC7713582 DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton beam therapy (PBT) has been a preferred modality in pediatric malignancies requiring radiotherapy. We report our preliminary experience of treating consecutive patients younger than 25 years with image-guided pencil beam scanning PBT from the first and only center on the Indian subcontinent. METHODS Patients were selected for PBT on the basis of a multidisciplinary tumor board decision. Patient demographic data, as well as tumor and treatment-related characteristics of the cohort, were captured. Patient and treatment-related factors and their association with acute toxicities were analyzed using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS Forty-seven patients (27 with CNS and 20 with non-CNS tumors) with a median age of 9 years (range, 2-25 years) were evaluated. Most common diagnoses were ependymoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and glioma. Seventy-seven percent of patients traveled more than 500 km, and 70% of them lived in metropolitan cities. Forty-nine percent of patients had recurrent disease at presentation, and 15% had received a previous course of radiation. The median dose delivered was 54.8 cobalt gray equivalents (range, 40.0-70.4 cobalt gray equivalents) to a median clinical target volume of 175 mL (range, 18.7-3,083.0 mL), with 34% of patients requiring concurrent chemotherapy (CCT). Acute grade 2 and grade 3 dermatitis, mucositis, and hematologic toxicity was noted in 45% and 2%, 34% and 0%, and 38% and 30% of patients, respectively. Grade 2 fatigue was noted in 26% of patients. On multivariable analysis, for CNS tumors, both CCT and craniospinal irradiation were independently associated with ≥ 2 grade hematologic toxicity, whereas among non-CNS tumors, a clinical target volume > 150 mL was associated with ≥ 2 grade fatigue, head and neck irradiation was associated with ≥ 2 grade mucositis, and CCT was associated with grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates safe implementation of a PBT program for children and young adults on the Indian subcontinent. Image-guided pencil beam scanning PBT in judiciously selected patients is feasible and can be delivered with acceptable acute toxicities.
Collapse
|
93
|
Yahya N, Manan HA. Neurocognitive impairment following proton therapy for paediatric brain tumour: a systematic review of post-therapy assessments. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:3035-3047. [PMID: 33040284 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05808-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton therapy (PT), frequently utilised to treat paediatric brain tumour (PBT) patients, eliminates exit dose and minimises dose to healthy tissues that theoretically can mitigate treatment-related effects including cognitive deficits. As clinical outcome data are emerging, we aimed to systematically review current evidence of cognitive changes following PT of PBT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched PubMed and Scopus electronic databases to identify eligible reports on cognitive changes following PT of PBT according to PRISMA guidelines. Reports were extracted for information on demographics and cognitive outcomes. Then, they were systematically reviewed based on three themes: (1) comparison with photon therapy, (2) comparison with baseline cognitive measures, to population normative mean or radiotherapy-naïve PBT patients and (3) effects of dose distribution to cognition. RESULTS Thirteen reports (median size (range): 70 (12-144)) were included. Four reports compared the cognitive outcome between PBT patients treated with proton to photon therapy and nine compared with baseline/normative mean/radiotherapy naïve from which two reported the effects of dose distribution. Reports found significantly poorer cognitive outcome among patients treated with photon therapy compared with proton therapy especially in general cognition and working memory. Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) was consistently associated with poorer cognitive outcome while focal therapy was associated with minor cognitive change/difference. In limited reports available, higher doses to the hippocampus and temporal lobes were implicated to larger cognitive change. CONCLUSION Available evidence suggests that PT causes less cognitive deficits compared with photon therapy. Children who underwent focal therapy with proton were consistently shown to have low risk of cognitive deficit suggesting the need for future studies to separate them from CSI. Evidence on the effect of dose distribution to cognition in PT is yet to mature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noorazrul Yahya
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, CODTIS, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Aziz, 50300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| | - Hanani Abdul Manan
- Functional Image Processing Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Cheras, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Brandal P, Bergfeldt K, Aggerholm-Pedersen N, Bäckström G, Kerna I, Gubanski M, Björnlinger K, Evensen ME, Kuddu M, Pettersson E, Brydøy M, Hellebust TP, Dale E, Valdman A, Weber L, Høyer M. A Nordic-Baltic perspective on indications for proton therapy with strategies for identification of proper patients. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1157-1163. [PMID: 32902341 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1817977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The beneficial effects of protons are primarily based on reduction of low to intermediate radiation dose bath to normal tissue surrounding the radiotherapy target volume. Despite promise for reduced long-term toxicity, the percentage of cancer patients treated with proton therapy remains low. This is probably caused by technical improvements in planning and delivery of photon therapy, and by high cost, low availability and lack of high-level evidence on proton therapy. A number of proton treatment facilities are under construction or have recently opened; there are now two operational Scandinavian proton centres and two more are under construction, thereby eliminating the availability hurdle. Even with the advantageous physical properties of protons, there is still substantial ambiguity and no established criteria related to which patients should receive proton therapy. This topic was discussed in a session at the Nordic Collaborative Workshop on Particle Therapy, held in Uppsala 14-15 November 2019. This paper resumes the Nordic-Baltic perspective on proton therapy indications and discusses strategies to identify patients for proton therapy. As for indications, neoplastic entities, target volume localisation, size, internal motion, age, second cancer predisposition, dose escalation and treatment plan comparison based on the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle or normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models were discussed. Importantly, the patient selection process should be integrated into the radiotherapy community and emphasis on collaboration across medical specialties, involvement of key decision makers and knowledge dissemination in general are important factors. An active Nordic-Baltic proton therapy organisation would also serve this purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petter Brandal
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Section for Cancer Cytogenetics, Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Irina Kerna
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | | | | | - Maire Kuddu
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | | | - Taran P. Hellebust
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Einar Dale
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Harrabi SB. [Is proton radiotherapy superior to photon radiotherapy in terms of intellectual outcome?]. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:1135-1138. [PMID: 32997188 PMCID: PMC7686222 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01692-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Semi B Harrabi
- Heidelberger Ionenstrahl-Therapiezentrum (HIT), Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Dellatolas G, Câmara-Costa H. The role of cerebellum in the child neuropsychological functioning. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2020; 173:265-304. [PMID: 32958180 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-64150-2.00023-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
This chapter proposes a review of neuropsychologic and behavior findings in pediatric pathologies of the cerebellum, including cerebellar malformations, pediatric ataxias, cerebellar tumors, and other acquired cerebellar injuries during childhood. The chapter also contains reviews of the cerebellar mutism/posterior fossa syndrome, reported cognitive associations with the development of the cerebellum in typically developing children and subjects born preterm, and the role of the cerebellum in neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorders and developmental dyslexia. Cognitive findings in pediatric cerebellar disorders are considered in the context of known cerebellocerebral connections, internal cellular organization of the cerebellum, the idea of a universal cerebellar transform and computational internal models, and the role of the cerebellum in specific cognitive and motor functions, such as working memory, language, timing, or control of eye movements. The chapter closes with a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the cognitive affective syndrome as it has been described in children and some conclusions and perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georges Dellatolas
- GRC 24, Handicap Moteur et Cognitif et Réadaptation, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
| | - Hugo Câmara-Costa
- GRC 24, Handicap Moteur et Cognitif et Réadaptation, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Centre d'Etudes en Santé des Populations, INSERM U1018, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Influence of Target Location, Size, and Patient Age on Normal Tissue Sparing- Proton and Photon Therapy in Paediatric Brain Tumour Patient-Specific Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092578. [PMID: 32927700 PMCID: PMC7563785 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy produces superior dose distributions compared to photon radiotherapy, reducing side effects. Differences between the two modalities are not fully quantified in paediatric patients for various intracranial tumour sites or age. Understanding these differences may help clinicians estimate the benefit and improve referral across available centres. Our aim was to compare intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) radiation doses for select paediatric intracranial tumours. METHODS IMPT and IMRT dose distributions for gender-matched paediatric cranial CT-datasets (ages 5, 9 and 13 years) were retrospectively calculated to simulate irradiation of supratentorial (ependymoma) and infratentorial (medulloblastoma) target volumes diameters (1-3 cm) and position (central and 1-2 cm shifts). RESULTS Clinical dosimetric objectives were achieved for all 216 treatment plans. Whilst infratentorial IMPT plans achieved greater maximum dose sparing to optic structures (4.8-12.6 Gy optic chiasm), brainstem sparing was limited (~0.5 Gy). Mean dose difference for optic chiasm was associated with medulloblastoma target position (p < 0.0197). Supratentorial IMPT plans demonstrated greater dose reduction for the youngest patients (pituitary gland p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Normal tissue sparing was achieved regardless of patient age for infratentorial tumours. However, for supratentorial tumours, there was a dosimetric advantage of IMPT across 9 vs. 13-year-old patients.
Collapse
|
98
|
Schaub L, Harrabi SB, Debus J. Particle therapy in the future of precision therapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200183. [PMID: 32795176 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The first hospital-based treatment facilities for particle therapy started operation about thirty years ago. Since then, the clinical experience with protons and carbon ions has grown continuously and more than 200,000 patients have been treated to date. The promising clinical results led to a rapidly increasing number of treatment facilities and many new facilities are planned or under construction all over the world. An inverted depth-dose profile combined with potential radiobiological advantages make charged particles a precious tool for the treatment of tumours that are particularly radioresistant or located nearby sensitive structures. A rising number of trials have already confirmed the benefits of particle therapy in selected clinical situations and further improvements in beam delivery, image guidance and treatment planning are expected. This review summarises some physical and biological characteristics of accelerated charged particles and gives some examples of their clinical application. Furthermore, challenges and future perspectives of particle therapy will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Carrie C, Kieffer V, Figarella-Branger D, Masliah-Planchon J, Bolle S, Bernier V, Laprie A, Supiot S, Leseur J, Habrand JL, Alapetite C, Kerr C, Dufour C, Claude L, Chapet S, Huchet A, Bondiau PY, Escande A, Truc G, Nguyen TD, Pasteuris C, Vigneron C, Muracciole X, Bourdeaut F, Appay R, Dubray B, Colin C, Ferlay C, Dussart S, Chabaud S, Padovani L. Exclusive Hyperfractionated Radiation Therapy and Reduced Boost Volume for Standard-Risk Medulloblastoma: Pooled Analysis of the 2 French Multicentric Studies MSFOP98 and MSFOP 2007 and Correlation With Molecular Subgroups. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:1204-1217. [PMID: 32768563 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Medulloblastoma has recently been characterized as a heterogeneous disease with 4 distinct molecular subgroups: wingless (WNT), sonic hedgehog (SHH), group 3, and group 4, with a new definition of risk stratification. We report progression-free survival, overall survival, and long-term cognitive effects in children with standard-risk medulloblastoma exclusively treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFRT), reduced boost volume, and online quality control, and we explore the prognostic value of biological characteristics in this chemotherapy-naïve population. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with standard-risk medulloblastoma were enrolled in 2 successive prospective multicentric studies, MSFOP 98 and MSFOP 2007, and received exclusive HFRT (36 Gy, 1 Gy/fraction twice daily) to the craniospinal axis followed by a boost at 68 Gy restricted to the tumor bed (1.5 cm margin), with online quality assurance before treatment. Patients with MYC or MYCN amplification were not excluded at the time of the study. We report progression-free survival and overall survival in the global population, and according to molecular subgroups as per World Health Organization 2016 molecular classification, and we present cognitive evaluations based on the Wechsler scale. RESULTS Data from 114 patients included in the MSFOP 98 trial from December 1998 to October 2001 (n = 48) and in the MSFOP 2007 from October 2008 to July 2013 (n = 66) were analyzed. With a median follow-up of 16.2 (range, 6.4-19.6) years for the MSFOP 98 cohort and 6.5 (1.6-9.6) years for the MSFOP 2007 cohort, 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival in the global population were 84% (74%-89%) and 74% (65%-81%), respectively. Molecular classification was determined for 91 patients (WNT [n = 19], SHH [n = 12], and non-WNT/non-SHH [n = 60]-including group 3 [n = 9], group 4 [n = 29], and not specified [n = 22]). Our results showed more favorable outcome for the WNT-activated subgroup and a worse prognosis for SHH-activated patients. Three patients had isolated extra-central nervous system relapse. The slope of neurocognitive decline in the global population was shallower than that observed in patients with a normofractionated regimen combined with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS HFRT led to a 5-year survival rate similar to other treatments combined with chemotherapy, with a reduced treatment duration of only 6 weeks. We confirm the MSFOP 98 results and the prognostic value of molecular status in patients with medulloblastoma, even in the absence of chemotherapy. Intelligence quotient was more preserved in children with medulloblastoma who received exclusive HFRT and reduced local boost, and intelligence quotient decline was delayed compared with patients receiving standard regimen. HFRT may be appropriate for patients who do not consent to or are not eligible for prospective clinical trials; for patients from developing countries for whom aplasia or ileus may be difficult to manage in a context of high cost/effectiveness constraints; and for whom shortened duration of RT may be easier to implement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Carrie
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leon Berard Cancer Center, and University of Lyon, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1044, INSA, Lyon, France.
| | - Virginie Kieffer
- Neuropsychologue CSI (Saint-Maurice hospital)/Gustave Roussy, Département de cancérologie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Dominique Figarella-Branger
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Institute of Neurophysiopathology, Marseille, France; Department of AnatomoPathology and Neuropathology, AP-HM, University Hospital Center la Timone, Marseille, France
| | | | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Valérie Bernier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Alexis Vautrin Cancer Center, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Institute of Cancer Toulouse-Oncopôle, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Julie Leseur
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Jean-Louis Habrand
- Department of Radiotherapy, François Baclesse Cancer Center, Caen, France
| | | | - Christine Kerr
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut regional du Cancer, Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Line Claude
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leon Berard Cancer Center, and University of Lyon, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1044, INSA, Lyon, France
| | - Sophie Chapet
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Center of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Aymeri Huchet
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Center of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Gilles Truc
- Department of Radiotherapy, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | - Tan Dat Nguyen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Jean Godinot Institute, Reims, France
| | - Caroline Pasteuris
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Center of Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Céline Vigneron
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Franck Bourdeaut
- SIREDO Pediatric Cancer Center, Institut Curie, Paris-Sciences-Lettres, Paris, France
| | - Romain Appay
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Institute of Neurophysiopathology, Marseille, France; Department of AnatomoPathology and Neuropathology, AP-HM, University Hospital Center la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Bernard Dubray
- Department of Radiotherapy, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Carole Colin
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Institute of Neurophysiopathology, Marseille, France; Department of AnatomoPathology and Neuropathology, AP-HM, University Hospital Center la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Céline Ferlay
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Leon Berard Cancer center, Lyon, France
| | - Sophie Dussart
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Leon Berard Cancer center, Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Chabaud
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Leon Berard Cancer center, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
100
|
Gross JP, Powell S, Zelko F, Hartsell W, Goldman S, Fangusaro J, Lulla RR, Smiley NP, Chang JHC, Gondi V. Improved neuropsychological outcomes following proton therapy relative to X-ray therapy for pediatric brain tumor patients. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:934-943. [PMID: 30997512 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of pediatric brain tumors are at risk for impaired development in multiple neuropsychological domains. The purpose of this study was to compare neuropsychological outcomes of pediatric brain tumor patients who underwent X-ray radiotherapy (XRT) versus proton radiotherapy (PRT). METHODS Pediatric patients who underwent either XRT or PRT and received posttreatment age-appropriate neuropsychological evaluation-including measures of intelligence (IQ), attention, memory, visuographic skills, academic skills, and parent-reported adaptive functioning-were identified. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess differences in neuropsychological outcomes and included tests for interaction between treatment cohort and follow-up time. RESULTS Between 1998 and 2017, 125 patients with tumors located in the supratentorial (17.6%), midline (28.8%), or posterior fossa (53.6%) compartments received radiation and had posttreatment neuropsychological evaluation. Median age at treatment was 7.4 years. The PRT patient cohort had higher estimated SES and shorter median time from radiotherapy completion to last neuropsychological evaluation (6.7 vs 2.6 y, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, PRT was associated with higher full-scale IQ (β = 10.6, P = 0.048) and processing speed (β = 14.4, P = 0.007) relative to XRT, with trend toward higher verbal IQ (β = 9.9, P = 0.06) and general adaptive functioning (β = 11.4, P = 0.07). Planned sensitivity analyses truncating follow-up interval in the XRT cohort re-demonstrated higher verbal IQ (P = 0.01) and IQ (P = 0.04) following PRT, with trend toward improved processing speed (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS PRT is associated with favorable outcomes for intelligence and processing speed. Combined with other strategies for treatment de-intensification, PRT may further reduce neuropsychological morbidity of brain tumor treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey P Gross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Stephanie Powell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Frank Zelko
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - William Hartsell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.,Radiation Oncology Consultants LLC, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois
| | - Stewart Goldman
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jason Fangusaro
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and the Aflac Cancer Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rishi R Lulla
- Department of Pediatrics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Natasha Pillay Smiley
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John Han-Chih Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.,Radiation Oncology Consultants LLC, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|