51
|
Haslam A, Herrera-Perez D, Gill J, Prasad V. Patient Experience Captured by Quality-of-Life Measurement in Oncology Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e200363. [PMID: 32129865 PMCID: PMC7057133 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Quality of life (QoL) is an important consideration in cancer medicine, especially because drugs are becoming more costly and may only result in modest gains in overall survival. However, there has been no descriptive analysis for the points at which QoL is measured in cancer trials. OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence of studies that measure QoL at different points and see how many studies measure QoL for the entirety of a patient's life. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional analysis includes all articles on oncology clinical trials in the 3 highest-impact oncology journals, published between July 2015 and June 2018, that reported QoL outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Data were abstracted on when QoL was assessed and the characteristics of these studies. RESULTS For all 149 studies that met inclusion criteria, QoL assessment was high during treatment (104 articles [69.8%]), during follow-up (81 articles [54.4%]), and after the end of the intervention (68 articles [45.6%]). In 5 of the 149 studies (3.4%), QoL was assessed until death, including in only 1 of the 74 studies on metastatic or incurable cancers. Among these 5 studies, only 1 (20%) used a drug intervention, 1 (20%) used a behavioral intervention, and 2 (40%) used a radiation intervention; only 1 of 5 was in the metastatic setting. The number of studies that reported a positive QoL outcome (ie, QoL outcome was more favorable in the intervention group than in the control group) was between 42 of 81 articles (51.9%) and 16 of 28 articles (57.1%) for most QoL assessment points but only 1 of 5 articles (20%) for studies measuring QoL until death. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that most clinical trials assessed QoL during the treatment or intervention and often during a given amount of follow-up but infrequently assessed QoL on disease progression and rarely followed QoL until the end of the patient's life. Most studies reporting QoL until the end of life reported worse QoL outcomes for the intervention group than the control group. Future research and policy recommendations should consider not just short-term QoL outcomes but QoL outcomes throughout the patient's cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyson Haslam
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | | | - Jennifer Gill
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Vinay Prasad
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- Center for Health Care Ethics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Patel R, Ludmir EB, Miccio JA, Menon H, Barsky AR, Mesko SM, Kodali M, Lautenschlaeger T, Adeberg S, Simone CB, Verma V. Disease-Related Outcomes and Toxicities of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy After Lung-Sparing Pleurectomy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 10:423-433. [PMID: 32088429 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This review explores the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) after lung-sparing surgery in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Because severe toxicities have been documented after radiation therapy for MPM, its use remains controversial, especially as modern surgical management has shifted toward lung-sparing pleurectomy/decortication. IMRT is an advanced technique that may allow for safer radiation therapy delivery, but there remains limited data (including no summative data) to support this notion. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a systematic review evaluating the safety and efficacy of post-pleurectomy IMRT (P-IMRT). A systematic review of PubMed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted for publications of all dates that specifically reported clinical outcomes and/or toxicities of P-IMRT in patients with MPM. Ten original studies were included in this review. RESULTS The incidence of grade 3 pneumonitis ranged from 0% to 16%, with all but 2 studies reporting rates below 9%. Grade 4 and 5 pneumonitis were observed in less than 1.5% of cases, except in one publication that used hypofractionated radiation therapy to doses >60 Gy. Crude local failure rates ranged from 19% to 60%, median progression free survival ranged from 12 to 16 months, and median overall survival ranged from 19 to 28 months. CONCLUSIONS P-IMRT produces relatively few higher-grade toxicities and has reasonable disease-related outcomes, especially when delivered using conventionally fractionated regimens to doses of 45 to 54 Gy and exercising careful attention to dose constraints during treatment planning. IMRT can thus be considered in well-selected patients in whom adequate survival after pleurectomy is expected. These data also support the initiation of the phase III NRG-LU006 trial of extended pleurectomy/decortication and chemotherapy with or without IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph A Miccio
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Hari Menon
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Andrew R Barsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Shane M Mesko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Manya Kodali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Tim Lautenschlaeger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignancy with some unique characteristics. Tumor biology is aggressive and prognosis is poor. Despite more knowledge on histology, tumor biology and staging, there is still a relevant discrepancy between clinical and pathologic staging resulting in difficult prediction of prognosis and treatment outcome, making treatment allocation more challenging than in most other malignancies. After years of nihilism in the late 80s, a period of activism started evaluating different treatment protocols combined with research driven mainly by academic centers; at the time, selection was based on histology and stage only. This period was important to gain knowledge about the disease. However, the interpretation of data was difficult since selection criteria and definitions varied substantially. Not surprisingly, until now there is no common agreement on best treatment even among specialists. Hence, a review of our current concepts is indicated and personalized treatment should become applicable in the future. Surgery was and still is an issue of debate. In principle, surgery is an effective approach as it allows macroscopic complete elimination of a tumor, which is relatively resistant to medical treatment. It helps to set the clock back and other therapies that have also just a limited effect can be applied sequentially before or after surgery. Furthermore, to date best long-term outcome is reported from surgical series in combination with other modalities. However, part of the community considers surgery associated with too high morbidity and mortality when balanced to the limited life expectancy. This criticism is understandable, since poor results after surgery are reported. The present article will review the indication for surgery and discuss the different procedures available for macroscopic complete resection-such as lung-preserving (extended) pleurectomy/decortication as well as extrapleural pneumonectomy to illustrate that 'The surgeon is still there!'
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - W Weder
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Burt BM, Lee HS, Raghuram AC, Strange C, Mason J, Strange T, Delgado J, Sugarbaker DJ. Preoperative prediction of unresectability in malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 159:2512-2520.e1. [PMID: 32087959 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Diffuse chest wall invasion (DCWI) is a common finding in patients undergoing intended resection for malignant pleural mesothelioma. We sought to determine the incidence and preoperative predictors of this finding, and to test our anecdotal impression that contraction of the ipsilateral hemithorax is associated with DCWI. METHODS This was a single-institution retrospective study of 170 patients undergoing intended macroscopic complete resection for malignant pleural mesothelioma from 2014-2018. A novel metric of thoracic cage volume was calculated by preoperative chest computed tomography. Univariable analyses were performed to determine associations of preoperative variables with DCWI. RESULTS Macroscopic complete resection was achieved by pleurectomy/decortication in 104 patients (61%) and by extrapleural pneumonectomy in 39 patients (23%). Unresectable disease was discovered at thoracotomy in 27 (16%) of patients; 24 (14%) by DCWI and 3 (2%) by intrathoracic organ invasion. In univariable analysis, decreased ipsilateral thoracic cage volume demonstrated the strongest association with unresectability by DCWI (P = .009) with >5% decrease in thoracic cage volume representing the optimal cutoff (P = .014; area under the curve, 0.67). Other preoperative variables associated with DCWI included preoperative chest pain requiring opioids (P = .028), prior pleurodesis (P = .036), decreased forced vital capacity (P = .023), decreased ipsilateral lung perfusion by ventilation/perfusion lung scan (P = .007), and magnetic resonance imaging findings of chest wall invasion (P = .035). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative identification of DCWI will avoid unnecessary thoracotomy and accelerate initiation of nonsurgical therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Our data suggest that contraction of thoracic cage volume has merit in predicting malignant pleural mesothelioma unresectability and should be validated in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan M Burt
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.
| | - Hyun-Sung Lee
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Anjali C Raghuram
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Chad Strange
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - James Mason
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Taylor Strange
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Juan Delgado
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - David J Sugarbaker
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Faccioli E, Bellini A, Mammana M, Monaci N, Schiavon M, Rea F. Extrapleural pneumonectomies for pleural mesothelioma. Expert Rev Respir Med 2019; 14:67-79. [PMID: 31674841 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1688147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a fatal malignancy for which there is no definitive cure. The most effective multimodality treatment in prolonging survival is still matter of debate. Surgery remains one of the cornerstones in the multimodality therapy for MPM. Extra-pleural pneumonectomy and pleurectomy/decortication are the two main curative-intent procedures; however, the superiority of one technique over the other is still debated. This review aims to assess short- and long-term results of extrapleural pneumonectomy for MPM.Areas covered: This article focuses on the role of extrapleural pneumonectomy in MPM. A systematic review was performed by using electronic databases to identify studies that included patients treated by this procedure for MPM. Endpoints included overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence rate, perioperative mortality, and morbidity.Expert commentary: This paper offers an overview of the results that are currently obtained in patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy for MPM. The benefit of surgical treatments in MPM is still debated and its primary goal should be the achievement of a macroscopic complete resection. Several alternative multimodality protocols exist, with specific advantages and drawbacks; therefore, individualization of care for each patient is fundamental. The complexity of the surgical treatment mandates that patients be referred to specialized centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Faccioli
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Alice Bellini
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Mammana
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Nicola Monaci
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Schiavon
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Federico Rea
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Xu D, Liang SQ, Yang H, Bruggmann R, Berezowska S, Yang Z, Marti TM, Hall SRR, Gao Y, Kocher GJ, Schmid RA, Peng RW. CRISPR Screening Identifies WEE1 as a Combination Target for Standard Chemotherapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Mol Cancer Ther 2019; 19:661-672. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-19-0724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
57
|
Ceresoli GL, Rossi A. Approved and emerging treatments of malignant pleural mesothelioma in elderly patients. Expert Rev Respir Med 2019; 13:1179-1188. [PMID: 31596154 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2019.1678386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare neoplasm with asbestos exposure as the dominant etiologic agent. Owing to the long latent period following exposure, MPM is often diagnosed late in life. Despite this, elderly patients are under-represented in clinical trials. To date, data regarding the tolerability and efficacy of anticancer treatments for elderly patients affected by MPM are still lacking.Areas covered: The current state-of-the-art of approved treatments employed in the treatment of MPM elderly patients is reviewed and discussed, with a look to emerging therapies. A structured search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature and of main meeting abstracts using a focused review question was undertaken.Expert opinion: Even though the median age of MPM patients enrolled in the most recent experimental trials is increasing, no specific analysis has been reported so far in the elderly. Moreover, no data are available for the 'oldest of the elderly' (>75 years). Treatment of elderly patients with MPM is one of the major challenges to the clinician. There is a clear need of large, well-conducted retrospective studies and above all of prospective investigations in this patient population, both in the first-and in the second-line setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Luca Ceresoli
- Division of Medical Oncology, Thoracic and Urologic Oncology Unit, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Antonio Rossi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Schröder C, Opitz I, Guckenberger M, Stahel R, Weder W, Förster R, Andratschke N, Lauk O. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) as Salvage Therapy for Oligorecurrent Pleural Mesothelioma After Multi-Modality Therapy. Front Oncol 2019; 9:961. [PMID: 31616640 PMCID: PMC6775182 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Therapy options for patients with oligoprogressive malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are limited. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) may be a promising therapeutic option, as it delivers a localized ablative dose of radiation and therefore balances efficacy and treatment related toxicities. The intent of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the feasibility of SBRT for limited pleural recurrences. Methods and Materials: This retrospective single-institution study is based on the 21 consecutive patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy for oligoprogressive MPM. Clinical and radiological data was collected at regular follow-up visits including toxicity, local control and survival. Results: At primary diagnosis, 57% of the patients presented with stage III disease. Initial treatment of MPM consisted of induction chemotherapy (n = 12) prior to a macroscopic complete resection (n = 18). Three patients received additional intracavitary chemotherapy and another three patients were treated with chemotherapy alone without another treatment at the time of first diagnosis. A total of 50 lesions in recurrent MPM were treated with SBRT. The median number of radiotherapy fractions was 5 (range 3–20) with a median dose per fraction of 5 Gy (range 2.5–12.5 Gy). The median total treatment dose was 30 Gy (20–50 Gy) with a median prescription isodose line (IDL) of 65% (65–100%). Median follow-up of all patients from diagnosis was 28 months (range 7–152 months). Analyzing all lesions separately, the 12-months-local control from SBRT was 73.5%. The median progression free survival (PFS) after SBRT was 6 months (range 0–21 months) and the median OS from first first SBRT was 29 months (range 0–61 months). Only one patients experienced above Grade 3 toxicities. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates the feasibility of a SBRT approach for oligorecurrent MPM. SBRT was well-tolerated even after multiple repetitions and local control was high with a promising median OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Schröder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Rolf Stahel
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Walter Weder
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert Förster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olivia Lauk
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Mutti L, Peikert T, Robinson BWS, Scherpereel A, Tsao AS, de Perrot M, Woodard GA, Jablons DM, Wiens J, Hirsch FR, Yang H, Carbone M, Thomas A, Hassan R. Scientific Advances and New Frontiers in Mesothelioma Therapeutics. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 13:1269-1283. [PMID: 29966799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive cancer that arises from the mesothelial surface of the pleural and peritoneal cavities, the pericardium, and rarely, the tunica vaginalis. The incidence of MPM is expected to increase worldwide in the next two decades. However, even with the use of multimodality treatment, MPM remains challenging to treat, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer has gathered experts in different areas of mesothelioma research and management to summarize the most significant scientific advances and new frontiers related to mesothelioma therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Mutti
- School of Environment and Life Sciences, College of Science and Technology, Cockcroft Building, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom
| | - Tobias Peikert
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bruce W S Robinson
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Arnaud Scherpereel
- Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, CHU de Lille, Univ Lille, Lille, France; French National Network of Clinical Expert Centres for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Management
| | - Anne S Tsao
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gavitt A Woodard
- Thoracic Oncology Program, Department of Surgery, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - David M Jablons
- Thoracic Oncology Program, Department of Surgery, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jacinta Wiens
- International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado; Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Haining Yang
- Thoracic Oncology, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Michele Carbone
- Thoracic Oncology, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Anish Thomas
- Development Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Hong JH, Lee HC, Choi KH, Moon SW, Kim KS, Hong SH, Hong JY, Kim YS. Preliminary results of entire pleural intensity-modulated radiotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting for resectable malignant mesothelioma. Radiat Oncol J 2019; 37:101-109. [PMID: 31266291 PMCID: PMC6610005 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2019.00150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the multimodality treatment with neoadjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for resectable clinical T1-3N0-1M0 malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Materials and Methods A total of eleven patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy between March 2016 and June 2018 were reviewed. Patients received 25 Gy in 5 fractions to entire ipsilateral hemithorax with helical tomotherapy. Results All of patients were men with a median age of 56 years. Epithelioid subtype was found in 10 patients. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pemetrexed-cisplatin regimen. Ten patients (90.9%) completed 25 Gy/5 fractions and one (9.0%) completed 20 Gy/4 fractions of radiotherapy. IMRT was well tolerated with only one acute grade 3 radiation pneumonitis. Surgery was performed 1 week (median, 8 days; range, 1 to 15 days) after completing IMRT. Extrapleural pneumonectomy was performed in 4 patients (36.3%), extended pleurectomy/decortication in 2 (18.2%) and pleurectomy/decortications in 5 (63.6%). There was no grade 3+ surgical complication except two deaths after EPP in 1 month. Based on operative findings and pathologic staging, adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered in 7 patients (63.6%), and 2 (18.2%) were decided to add adjuvant radiotherapy. After a median follow-up of 14.6 months (range, 2.8 to 30 months), there were 3 local recurrence (33.3%) and 1 distant metastasis (11.1%). Conclusion Neoadjuvant entire pleural IMRT can be delivered with a favorable radiation complication. An optimal strategy has to be made in resectable MPM patients who would benefit from neoadjuvant radiation and surgery. Further studies are needed to look at long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hyun Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Chun Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyu Hye Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok Whan Moon
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Soo Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk Hee Hong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju-Young Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeon-Sil Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Riesterer O, Ciernik IF, Stahel RA, Xyrafas A, Aebersold DM, Plasswilm L, Mahmut Ozsahin E, Zwahlen DR, Nackaerts K, Zimmermann F, Sabrina Stark L, Weder W, Krayenbuehl J. Pattern of failure after adjuvant radiotherapy following extrapleural pneumonectomy of pleural mesothelioma in the SAKK 17/04 trial. Radiother Oncol 2019; 138:121-125. [PMID: 31252293 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2018] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative radiotherapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy of malignant pleural mesothelioma was investigated in the randomized phase II trial SAKK17/04. The relapse rate within the high and/or low-dose PTV without previous distant failure was 24%, the isolated in-field-relapse rate within the PTVs was 5% and the distant relapse rate outside of the PTVs was 81%. Clinical outcome was mainly determined by distant disease progression outside of the radiation field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Riesterer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Center for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland.
| | - I Frank Ciernik
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Dessau, Germany
| | - Rolf A Stahel
- Cancer Center Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alexandros Xyrafas
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ludwig Plasswilm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - E Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Lausanne - CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Daniel R Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Kristiaan Nackaerts
- Department of Pneumology, KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frank Zimmermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - L Sabrina Stark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Walter Weder
- Thoracic Surgery Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Krayenbuehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Kresoja-Rakic J, Szpechcinski A, Kirschner MB, Ronner M, Minatel B, Martinez VD, Lam WL, Weder W, Stahel R, Früh M, Cerciello F, Felley-Bosco E. miR-625-3p and lncRNA GAS5 in Liquid Biopsies for Predicting the Outcome of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients Treated with Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery. Noncoding RNA 2019; 5:E41. [PMID: 31212997 PMCID: PMC6631473 DOI: 10.3390/ncrna5020041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Combining neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery is part of multimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), but not all patients benefit from this approach. In this exploratory analysis, we investigated the prognostic value of circulating miR-625-3p and lncRNA GAS5 after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. 36 MPM patients from the SAKK 17/04 trial (NCT00334594), whose blood was available before and after chemotherapy were investigated. RNA was isolated from plasma and reverse transcribed into cDNA. miR-16-5p and β-actin were used as a reference gene for miR-625-3p and GAS5, respectively. After exclusion of samples due to hemolysis or RNA degradation, paired plasma samples from 32 patients before and after chemotherapy were further analyzed. Quantification of miR-625-3p levels in all 64 samples revealed a bimodal distribution and cloning and sequencing of miR-625-3p qPCR product revealed the presence of miR-625-3p isomiRs. Relative change of the circulating miR-625-3p and GAS5 levels after chemotherapy showed that increased circulating miR-625-3p and decreased GAS5 was significantly associated with disease progression (Fisher's test, p = 0.0393). In addition, decreased levels of circulating GAS5 were significantly associated with shorter overall and progression-free survival. Our exploratory analysis revealed a potential value of circulating non-coding RNA for selection of patients likely to benefit from surgery after platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Kresoja-Rakic
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Adam Szpechcinski
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Michaela B Kirschner
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Manuel Ronner
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Brenda Minatel
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.
| | - Victor D Martinez
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.
- IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada.
| | - Wan L Lam
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.
| | - Walter Weder
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Rolf Stahel
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Zürich, University Hospital Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Martin Früh
- Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology, University of Bern, CH-3000 Bern, Switzerland.
| | | | - Emanuela Felley-Bosco
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Gomez DR, Rimner A, Simone CB, Cho BCJ, de Perrot M, Adjei AA, Bueno R, Gill RR, Harpole DH, Hesdorffer M, Hirsch FR, Jackson AA, Pass HI, Rice DC, Rusch VW, Tsao AS, Yorke E, Rosenzweig K. The Use of Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Expert Opinion from the National Cancer Institute Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14:1172-1183. [PMID: 31125736 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Detailed guidelines regarding the use of radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are currently lacking because of the rarity of the disease, the wide spectrum of clinical presentations, and the paucity of high-level data on individual treatment approaches. METHODS In March 2017, a multidisciplinary meeting of mesothelioma experts was cosponsored by the U.S. National Cancer Institute, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Research, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. Among the outcomes of this conference was the foundation of detailed, multidisciplinary consensus guidelines. RESULTS Here we present consensus recommendations on the use of radiation therapy for MPM in three discrete scenarios: (1) hemithoracic radiation therapy to be used before or after extrapleural pneumonectomy; (2) hemithoracic radiation to be used as an adjuvant to lung-sparing procedures (i.e., without pneumonectomy); and (3) palliative radiation therapy for focal symptoms caused by the disease. We discuss appropriate simulation techniques, treatment volumes, dose fractionation regimens, and normal tissue constraints. We also assess the role of particle beam therapy, specifically, proton beam therapy, for MPM. CONCLUSION The recommendations provided in this consensus statement should serve as important guidelines for developing future clinical trials of treatment approaches for MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - B C John Cho
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alex A Adjei
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ritu R Gill
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David H Harpole
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Fred R Hirsch
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado; Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Harvey I Pass
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - David C Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anne S Tsao
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Rosenzweig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Verma V, Wegner RE, Ludmir EB, Hasan S, Colonias A, Grover S, Friedberg JS, Simone CB. Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in the Elderly Population. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:2357-2366. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07351-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
65
|
Trovo M, Franceschini D, Furlan C, Pietrobon F, Vagge S, Farina E, Revelant A, Visani L, Maragna V, Parisi G, Scotti V. Extra-pleural pneumonectomy in the era of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiol Med 2019; 124:854-859. [PMID: 30963379 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-01030-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the outcome of malignant pleural mesothelioma patients treated with extra-pleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), using the most advanced radiotherapeutic techniques, namely image-guided intensity-modulated RT (IG-IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty-four patients were analyzed. Minimum radiation dose was 50 Gy (2 Gy/fr). Planning target volume encompassed the entire hemithorax, including the ipsilateral mediastinum if interested by disease, the pericardium and diaphragm, and any drain sites. The study endpoints included loco-regional control (LRC), distant metastases free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), as well as radiation-related toxicity. RESULTS Major patients and treatment characteristics were the following: median age 62 years, epithelioid histology in 51 (94%) cases, locally advanced disease in 41 (90%) cases, and metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes in 27 patients (50%). Only 7 patients (13%) had gross residual disease after surgery. Chemotherapy was administered in 38 patients (70%). Median follow-up was 16 months (range 0-73 months). Median and 2-year OS were 21 months and was 43.8%, respectively. The predominant pattern of failure was distant: 34 patients (62.9%) developed some component of distant failure, and only 5 patients (9.2%) developed an isolated loco-regional recurrence. The estimates of LRC and DMFS at 2 years were 63.4% and 43.4%, respectively. Three fatal pneumonitis were documented. Other major toxicities included: Grade 2 and 3 pneumonitis in 1 and 2 cases, respectively, 1 case of bronchial fistula, pleural empyema, and Grade 3 esophagitis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although executed in the era of high-technology radiotherapy (IG-IMRT), EPP should not be routinely performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Trovo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Udine, P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Furlan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Martino di Belluno, Viale Europa 22, 32100, Belluno, Italy
| | - Francesca Pietrobon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Martino di Belluno, Viale Europa 22, 32100, Belluno, Italy
| | - Stefano Vagge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino di Genova - IST, Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Eleonora Farina
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, CRO IRCCS, Via Franco Gallini, 2, 33081, Aviano, PN, Italy
| | - Alberto Revelant
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, CRO IRCCS, Via Franco Gallini, 2, 33081, Aviano, PN, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Virginia Maragna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Parisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Udine, P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
| | - Vieri Scotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Nelson DB, Rice DC, Mitchell KG, Tsao AS, Vaporciyan AA, Antonoff MB, Hofstetter WL, Walsh GL, Swisher SG, Roth JA, Gomez DR, Mehran RJ, Sepesi B. Defining the role of adjuvant radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a propensity-matched landmark analysis of the National Cancer Database. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:1269-1278. [PMID: 31179069 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.04.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Multimodality therapy may prolong survival among resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, the role of adjuvant radiation remains controversial. We explored a large nationwide database to determine whether adjuvant radiation is associated with improved survival. Methods The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients with MPM who received cancer-directed surgery between 2004-2013. Adjuvant radiation included intensity modulated radiation therapy or conformal 3D radiation. Propensity matching was performed with a 150-day landmark to address survivorship bias. Cox regression was used with an interaction term between pathologic stage and radiation. Results A total of 2,846 patients were identified as having undergone cancer-directed surgery for MPM; among whom 213 (7%) received adjuvant radiation. Adjuvant radiation was associated with improved survival among those who were stage I-II (P=0.024), but not stage III or IV (P=0.890 and P=0.183, respectively). After propensity matching, adjuvant radiation was associated with improved survival for those who were stage I-II [hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, P=0.035], whereas no similar effect was observed for those who were stage III or IV (P=0.190 and P=0.562, respectively). Multivariable regression revealed that sarcomatoid histology (HR 1.80, P=0.018) and stage IV disease (HR 1.65, P=0.033) were also associated with worse survival. Conclusions Adjuvant radiation was associated with improved survival among those with pathologic stage I-II MPM. No survival advantage was observed for those with pathologic stage III or stage IV MPM, however. Our results justify the need for further prospective trials to investigate the utility of adjuvant radiotherapy among those with MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Nelson
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David C Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kyle G Mitchell
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anne S Tsao
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ara A Vaporciyan
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mara B Antonoff
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Garrett L Walsh
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack A Roth
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Reza J Mehran
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Boris Sepesi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Cavin S, Riedel T, Rosskopfova P, Gonzalez M, Baldini G, Zellweger M, Wagnières G, Dyson PJ, Ris H, Krueger T, Perentes JY. Vascular‐targeted low dose photodynamic therapy stabilizes tumor vessels by modulating pericyte contractility. Lasers Surg Med 2019; 51:550-561. [DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Cavin
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Tina Riedel
- Institute of Chemical Sciences and EngineeringSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
| | - Petra Rosskopfova
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Michel Gonzalez
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Greg Baldini
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Matthieu Zellweger
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Georges Wagnières
- Institute of PhysicsSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
| | - Paul J. Dyson
- Institute of Chemical Sciences and EngineeringSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
| | - Hans‐Beat Ris
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Thorsten Krueger
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Jean Y. Perentes
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisLausanneSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma with chemotherapy preceding versus after surgical resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157:758-766.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2018] [Revised: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
69
|
de Perrot M, Cho J. Non-ablative hypofractionated hemithoracic radiation-a new standard of care in mesothelioma? J Thorac Dis 2019; 10:S4088-S4092. [PMID: 30631563 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.09.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marc de Perrot
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - John Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Radiation Therapy in Mesothelioma. Radiat Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52619-5_36-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
71
|
Imbimbo M, Maury JM, Garassino M, Girard N, Hackl M, Eycken EV, Henau K, Dimitrova N, Sekerija M, Dušek L, Mägi M, Malila N, Leinonen M, Velten M, Troussard X, Bouvier V, Guizard AV, Bouvier AM, Arveux P, Maynadié M, Woronoff AS, Robaszkiewicz M, Baldi I, Monnereau A, Tretarre B, Colonna M, Molinié F, Bara S, Schvartz C, Lapôtre-Ledoux B, Grosclaude P, Stabenow R, Luttmann S, Nennecke A, Engel J, Schubert-Fritschle G, Heidrich J, Holleczek B, Jónasson JG, Clough-Gorr K, Comber H, Mazzoleni G, Giacomin A, Sardo AS, Barchielli A, Serraino D, De Angelis R, Mallone S, Tavilla A, Pierannunzio D, Rossi S, Santaquilani M, Knijn A, Pannozzo F, Gennaro V, Benfatto L, Ricci P, Autelitano M, Spagnoli G, Fusco M, Usala M, Vitale F, Michiara M, Tumino R, Mangone L, Falcini F, Ferretti S, Angela Filiberti R, Marani E, Iannelli A, Sensi F, Piffer S, Gentilini M, Madeddu A, Ziino A, Maspero S, Candela P, Stracci F, Tagliabue G, Rugge M, Trama A, Gatta G, Botta L, Capocaccia R, Pildava S, Smailyte G, Calleja N, Johannesen TB, Rachtan J, Góźdź S, Błaszczyk J, Kępska K, de Lacerda GF, Bento MJ, Miranda A, Diba CS, Almar E, Larrañaga N, de Munain AL, Torrella-Ramos A, Díaz García JM, Marcos-Gragera R, Sanchez MJ, Navarro C, Salmeron D, Moreno-Iribas C, Galceran J, Carulla M, Mousavi M, Bouchardy C, Ess SM, Bordoni A, Konzelmann I, Rashbass J, Gavin A, Brewster DH, Huws DW, Visser O, Bielska-Lasota M, Primic-Zakelj M, Kunkler I, Benhamou E. Mesothelioma and thymic tumors: Treatment challenges in (outside) a network setting. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:75-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2017] [Revised: 01/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
72
|
Frick AE, Nackaerts K, Moons J, Lievens Y, Verbeken E, Lambrecht M, Coolen J, Dooms C, Vansteenkiste J, De Leyn P, Nafteux P. Combined modality treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a single-centre long-term survival analysis using extrapleural pneumonectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 55:934-941. [DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Revised: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Elisabeth Frick
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kristiaan Nackaerts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Histopathology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johnny Moons
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eric Verbeken
- Department of Histopathology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Lambrecht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Coolen
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe Dooms
- Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Respiratory Oncology Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Vansteenkiste
- Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Respiratory Oncology Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paul De Leyn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Philippe Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Rosskamp M, Macq G, Nackaerts K, Praet M, Van Eycken L, Van Meerbeeck JP, De Schutter H. Real-life treatment practice for malignant pleural mesothelioma in Belgium. Lung Cancer 2018; 125:258-264. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
74
|
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease of the pleura and is largely related to asbestos exposure. Despite recent advancements in technologies and a greater understanding of the disease, the prognosis of MPM remains poor; the median overall survival rate is about 6 to 9 months in untreated patients. The main therapeutic strategies for MPM are surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT). The two main surgical approaches for MPM are extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), in which the lung is removed en bloc, and pleurectomy/decortication, in which the lung stays in situ. Chemotherapy usually consists of a platinum-based chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, often combined with a folate antimetabolite, such as pemetrexed. More recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a possible therapeutic strategy for MPM. Evidence suggests that single-modality treatments are not an effective therapeutic approach for MPM. Therefore, researchers have started to explore different multimodality treatment approaches, in which often combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and RT are investigated. There is still no definitive answer to the question of which multimodality treatment combinations are most effective in improving the poor prognosis of MPM. Research into the effects of trimodality treatment approaches have found that radical approaches such as EPP and hemithoracic RT post-EPP are less effective than was previously assumed. In general, there are still a great number of unanswered questions and unknown factors regarding the ideal treatment approach for MPM. Hopefully, more research into multimodality therapy will provide insight into which combination of treatment modalities is most effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawek Berzenji
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium
| | - Paul Van Schil
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
De Bondt C, Psallidas I, Van Schil PEY, van Meerbeeck JP. Combined modality treatment in mesothelioma: a systemic literature review with treatment recommendations. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2018; 7:562-573. [PMID: 30450295 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.10.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
In spite of recent progress, malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains synonymous with poor prognosis. A selected minority (<10%) of patients is eligible for a radical treatment with a combination of systemic chemotherapy (CT) and/or surgery and/or radiotherapy (RT), in an effort to maintain locoregional tumor control after achieving a macroscopically complete resection (MCR). However, as of yet there is no standard of care for this so-called multimodality treatment. As its potential gain is still limited (approximately one year added to overall survival), we must balance its efficacy with its cumulative toxicity. Several combined modality treatment trials are currently ongoing using novel techniques in surgery, RT and/or CT in an attempt to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with older multimodality treatment protocols. Guidelines are following suit and are now including or mentioning this treatment option. In this systematic review, we analyze the available data in order to address the following questions: Is combined modality better than single modality? What is the optimal regimen within each modality? What is the optimal sequence of combined modality?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte De Bondt
- Department Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ioannis Psallidas
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul E Y Van Schil
- Department Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jan P van Meerbeeck
- Department Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Süveg K, Putora PM, Berghmans T, Glatzer M, Kovac V, Cihoric N. Current efforts in research of pleural mesothelioma—An analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Lung Cancer 2018; 124:12-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
77
|
Fodor A, Broggi S, Incerti E, Dell'Oca I, Fiorino C, Samanes Gajate AM, Pasetti M, Cattaneo MG, Passoni P, Gianolli L, Calandrino R, Picchio M, Di Muzio N. Moderately Hypofractionated Helical IMRT, FDG-PET/CT-guided, for Progressive Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Patients With Intact Lungs. Clin Lung Cancer 2018; 20:e29-e38. [PMID: 30253920 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to present the outcomes of moderately hypofractionated helical intensity-modulated radiation therapy (HT) with/without simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) on fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) positive areas (gross tumor volume [GTV]-PET) for patients with progressive malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) after previous treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS From May 2006 to April 2014, 51 patients with a median age of 68.8 years (range, 38.6-82 years) were treated. There were 41 men and 10 women; 43 epithelioid MPM and 8 sarcomatoid, involving the left pleura in 25 patients and the right pleura in 26 patients. The initial stage was: I, 11 patients; II, 14 patients; III, 17 patients; and IV, 9 patients. Chemotherapy was prescribed for 46 patients, for 6 cycles (range, 0-18 cycles). Eighteen patients had pleurectomy/decortication, and 33 had talc pleurodesis. FDG-PET was used for target identification. A median dose of 56 Gy/25 fractions was prescribed to the involved pleura, and SIB to 62.5 Gy to GTV-PET was added in 38 patients. RESULTS The median survival from diagnosis was 25.8 months (range, 8.4-99.0 months). One patient, treated with SIB, was alive at the October 2017 follow-up. Two cases of grade 5 radiation pneumonitis were registered. A GTV-PET ≤ 205 cc was predictive of late ≥ grade 2 lung toxicity, but also of better survival in stage III and IV disease: 5.9 versus 11.7 months (P = .04). A GTV-PET ≥ 473 cc was predictive of early death (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS Moderately hypofractionated, FDG-PET guided salvage HT in patients with progressive MPM after previous treatments showed acceptable toxicity and outcome results similar to adjuvant radiotherapy after pleurectomy/decortication, suggesting that the delay of radiotherapy is not detrimental to survival, and has the associated benefit of postponing inherent toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei Fodor
- Department of Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Sara Broggi
- Department of Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Incerti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Italo Dell'Oca
- Department of Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorino
- Department of Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marcella Pasetti
- Department of Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro G Cattaneo
- Department of Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Passoni
- Department of Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Gianolli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Calandrino
- Department of Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Di Muzio
- Department of Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Verma V, Ahern CA, Berlind CG, Lindsay WD, Shabason J, Sharma S, Culligan MJ, Grover S, Friedberg JS, Simone CB. Survival by Histologic Subtype of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma and the Impact of Surgical Resection on Overall Survival. Clin Lung Cancer 2018; 19:e901-e912. [PMID: 30224273 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For the 3 histologic subtypes of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)-epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic-the magnitude of benefit with surgical management remains underdefined. MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried for newly diagnosed nonmetastatic MPM with known histology. Patients in each histologic group were dichotomized into those receiving gross macroscopic resection versus lack thereof/no surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between cohorts; multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed factors associated with OS. After propensity matching, survival was evaluated for each histologic subtype with and without surgery. RESULTS Overall, 4207 patients (68% epithelioid, 18% sarcomatoid, 13% biphasic) met the study criteria. Before propensity matching, patients with epithelioid disease experienced the highest median OS (14.4 months), followed by biphasic (9.5 months) and sarcomatoid (5.3 months) disease; this also persisted after propensity matching (P < .001). After propensity matching, surgery was associated with significantly improved OS for epithelioid (20.9 vs. 14.7 months, P < .001) and biphasic (14.5 vs. 8.8 months, P = .013) but not sarcomatoid (11.2 vs. 6.5 months, P = .140) disease. On multivariable analysis, factors predictive of poorer OS included advanced age, male gender, uninsured status, urban residence, treatment at community centers, and T4/N2 disease (all P < .05). Chemotherapy and surgery were independently associated with improved OS, as was histology (all P < .001). CONCLUSION This large investigation evaluated surgical practice patterns and survival by histology for MPM and found that histology independently affects survival. Gross macroscopic resection is associated with significantly increased survival in epithelioid and biphasic, but not sarcomatoid, disease. However, the decision to perform surgery should continue to be individualized in light of available randomized data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | | | - Jacob Shabason
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sonam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Melissa J Culligan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Surbhi Grover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joseph S Friedberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Tallón de Lara P, Cecconi V, Hiltbrunner S, Yagita H, Friess M, Bode B, Opitz I, Vrugt B, Weder W, Stolzmann P, Felley-Bosco E, Stahel RA, Tischler V, Britschgi C, Soldini D, van den Broek M, Curioni-Fontecedro A. Gemcitabine Synergizes with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Overcomes Resistance in a Preclinical Model and Mesothelioma Patients. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:6345-6354. [PMID: 30154226 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy is under investigation for cancer treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We studied the rationale of such a combination for treating mesothelioma, a disease with limited treatment options. RESULTS The combination of gemcitabine and immune checkpoint inhibitors outperformed immunotherapy alone with regard to tumor control and survival in a preclinical mesothelioma model; however, the addition of dexamethasone to gemcitabine and immune checkpoint inhibitors nullified the synergistic clinical response. Furthermore, treatment with gemcitabine plus anti-PD-1 resulted in an objective clinical response in two patients with mesothelioma, who were resistant to gemcitabine or anti-PD-1 as monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Thus, treatment of mesothelioma with a combination of gemcitabine with immune checkpoint inhibitors is feasible and results in synergistic clinical response compared with single treatment in the absence of steroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Virginia Cecconi
- Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Hideo Yagita
- Department of Immunology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Martina Friess
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Beata Bode
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bart Vrugt
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Walter Weder
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paul Stolzmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Rolf A Stahel
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Verena Tischler
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Britschgi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Davide Soldini
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maries van den Broek
- Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
80
|
Cramer G, Simone CB, Busch TM, Cengel KA. Adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and definitive radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:S2565-S2573. [PMID: 30206500 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
While ionizing radiotherapy (RT) can provide durable local control, the relative radiosensitivity of surrounding organs such as the lungs and heart and the distributed nature of the pleura limit the ability to safely deliver RT for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Recent advances in the technological sophistication of RT planning and delivery devices have resulted in increased spatial control of irradiation dose that has extended the palliative and definitive applications of RT for patients with MPM. This review will outline the logistical, mechanistic and clinical basics of RT and the clinical trials supporting the use of RT in the multidisciplinary care of patients with MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwendolyn Cramer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Theresa M Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Bibby AC, Maskell NA. Current treatments and trials in malignant pleural mesothelioma. CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL 2018; 12:2161-2169. [DOI: 10.1111/crj.12938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 04/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna C. Bibby
- Academic Respiratory Unit; Translation Health Science; Bristol Medical School; Bristol United Kingdom
- North Bristol Lung Centre; North Bristol NHS Trust; Bristol United Kingdom
| | - Nick A. Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit; Translation Health Science; Bristol Medical School; Bristol United Kingdom
- North Bristol Lung Centre; North Bristol NHS Trust; Bristol United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Riedel T, Cavin S, van den Bergh H, Krueger T, Liaudet L, Ris HB, Dyson PJ, Perentes JY. Chemo-manipulation of tumor blood vessels by a metal-based anticancer complex enhances antitumor therapy. Sci Rep 2018; 8:10263. [PMID: 29980753 PMCID: PMC6035176 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28589-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Human pleural mesothelioma is an incurable and chemoresistant cancer. Using a nude mouse xenograft model of human pleural mesothelioma, we show that RAPTA-T, a compound undergoing preclinical evaluation, enhances tumor vascular function by decreasing blood vessel tortuosity and dilation, while increasing the coverage of endothelial cells by pericytes and vessel perfusion within tumors. This in turn significantly reduces the interstitial fluid pressure and increases oxygenation in the tumor. Consequently, RAPTA-T pre-treatment followed by the application of cisplatin or liposomal cisplatin (Lipoplatin) leads to increased levels of the cytotoxin in the tumor and enhanced mesothelioma growth inhibition. We demonstrate that the vascular changes induced by RAPTA-T are related, in part, to the inhibition of poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) which is associated to tumor vascular stabilization. These findings suggest novel therapeutic implications for RAPTA-T to create conditions for superior drug uptake and efficacy of approved cytotoxic anti-cancer drugs in malignant pleural mesothelioma and potentially other chemoresistant tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Riedel
- Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sabrina Cavin
- Service of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Hubert van den Bergh
- Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thorsten Krueger
- Service of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lucas Liaudet
- Service of Adult Critical Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Hans-Beat Ris
- Service of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Paul J Dyson
- Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Y Perentes
- Service of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Xu D, Liang SQ, Yang H, Lüthi U, Riether C, Berezowska S, Marti TM, Hall SRR, Bruggmann R, Kocher GJ, Schmid RA, Peng RW. Increased sensitivity to apoptosis upon endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced activation of the unfolded protein response in chemotherapy-resistant malignant pleural mesothelioma. Br J Cancer 2018; 119:65-75. [PMID: 29921948 PMCID: PMC6035279 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0145-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard treatment for advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a cisplatin/pemetrexed (MTA) regimen; however, this is confronted by drug resistance. Proteotoxic stress in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a hallmark of cancer and some rely on this stress signalling in response to cytotoxic chemotherapeutics. We hypothesise that ER stress and the adaptive unfolded protein response (UPR) play a role in chemotherapy resistance of MPM. METHODS In vitro three-dimensional (3D) and ex vivo organotypic culture were used to enrich a chemotherapy-resistant population and recapitulate an in vivo MPM microenvironment, respectively. Markers of ER stress, the UPR and apoptosis were assessed at mRNA and protein levels. Cell viability was determined based on acid phosphatase activity. RESULTS MPM cells with de novo and/or acquired chemotherapy resistance displayed low ER stress, which rendered the cells hypersensitive to agents that induce ER stress and alter the UPR. Bortezomib, an FDA-approved proteasome inhibitor, selectively impairs chemotherapy-resistant MPM cells by activating the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4-mediated UPR and augmenting apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS We provide the first evidence for ER stress and the adaptive UPR signalling in chemotherapy resistance of MPM, which suggests that perturbation of the UPR by altering ER stress is a novel strategy to treat chemotherapy-refractory MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duo Xu
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Shun-Qing Liang
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Haitang Yang
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ursina Lüthi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carsten Riether
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.,Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Thomas M Marti
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sean R R Hall
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Rémy Bruggmann
- Interfaculty Bioinformatics Unit, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gregor J Kocher
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ralph A Schmid
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. .,Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Ren-Wang Peng
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. .,Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Batirel HF, Metintas M, Caglar HB, Ak G, Yumuk PF, Ahiskali R, Bozkurtlar E, Bekiroglu N, Lacin T, Yildizeli B, Yuksel M. Macroscopic complete resection is not associated with improved survival in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 155:2724-2733. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
85
|
Shaaban SG, Verma V, Choi JI, Shabason J, Sharma S, Glass E, Grover S, Badiyan SN, Simone CB. Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in the United States. Clin Lung Cancer 2018; 19:e685-e692. [PMID: 29803576 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2018] [Revised: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has historically been delivered using 3-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT) techniques, multiple reports show noteworthy safety and efficacy of the more advanced intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). To our knowledge, this is the only known study to evaluate national practice patterns of IMRT utilization for MPM. MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried for newly-diagnosed MPM patients who underwent definitive surgery (extrapleural pneumonectomy [EPP] or extended pleurectomy/decortication [P/D]) followed by adjuvant RT. Patients with metastatic disease, non-EPP or P/D surgical techniques, and lack of RT receipt (or without specified RT technique) were excluded. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis, and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS Overall, 286 patients met criteria (181 [63%] IMRT and 105 [37%] 3DCRT). Temporal trends revealed that although 3DCRT was more common at initial time periods, IMRT utilization rose from 2004 to 2007 and stayed as a relatively constant majority thereafter. This was also present when substratifying the cohort according to EPP versus P/D approaches. IMRT was more often delivered at academic centers, along with institutions in the Southern United States, whereas 3DCRT was more frequently utilized in community facilities and in the Northeast (P ≤ .05 for all). RT technique did not affect OS (P > .05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION In the United States, IMRT is now the most commonly utilized adjuvant RT technique for MPM. Facility and regional differences might associate with IMRT delivery. The findings of this investigation have implications for insurance coverage, clinical referral patterns, and ongoing and future prospective trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherif G Shaaban
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - J Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jacob Shabason
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sonam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Erica Glass
- California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA
| | - Surbhi Grover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
86
|
McCambridge AJ, Napolitano A, Mansfield AS, Fennell DA, Sekido Y, Nowak AK, Reungwetwattana T, Mao W, Pass HI, Carbone M, Yang H, Peikert T. Progress in the Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in 2017. J Thorac Oncol 2018; 13:606-623. [PMID: 29524617 PMCID: PMC6544834 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an uncommon, almost universally fatal, asbestos-induced malignancy. New and effective strategies for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment are urgently needed. Herein we review the advances in MPM achieved in 2017. Whereas recent epidemiological data demonstrated that the incidence of MPM-related death continued to increase in United States between 2009 and 2015, new insight into the molecular pathogenesis and the immunological tumor microenvironment of MPM, for example, regarding the role of BRCA1 associated protein 1 and the expression programmed death receptor ligand 1, are highlighting new potential therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, there continues to be an ever-expanding number of clinical studies investigating systemic therapies for MPM. These trials are primarily focused on immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination with other immunotherapies and nonimmunotherapies. In addition, other promising targeted therapies, including pegylated adenosine deiminase (ADI-PEG20), which focuses on argininosuccinate synthase 1-deficient tumors, and tazemetostat, an enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit inhibitor of BRCA1 associated protein 1 gene (BAP1)-deficient tumors, are currently being explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Napolitano
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome,
Rome, Italy
| | | | - Dean A. Fennell
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester
& University Hospitals of Leicester, UK
| | - Yoshitaka Sekido
- Division of Molecular Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Research
Institute, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Anna K. Nowak
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health
and Medical Sciences; National Center for Asbestos Related Diseases, University of
Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Thanyanan Reungwetwattana
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of
Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Weimin Mao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital; Key
Laboratory Diagnosis and Treatment Technology on Thoracic Oncology of Zehjiang
Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Harvey I. Pass
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University, Langone
Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Haining Yang
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Tobias Peikert
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
New Insights on Diagnostic Reproducibility of Biphasic Mesotheliomas: A Multi-Institutional Evaluation by the International Mesothelioma Panel From the MESOPATH Reference Center. J Thorac Oncol 2018; 13:1189-1203. [PMID: 29723687 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Revised: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The 2015 WHO classification of tumors categorized malignant mesothelioma into epithelioid, biphasic (BMM), and sarcomatoid (SMM) for prognostic relevance and treatment decisions. The survival of BMM is suspected to correlate with the amount of the sarcomatoid component. The criteria for a sarcomatoid component and the interobserver variability between pathologists for identifying this component are not well described. In ambiguous cases, a "transitional" (TMM) subtype has been proposed but was not accepted as a specific subtype in the 2015 WHO classification. The aims of this study were to evaluate the interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of BMM, to determine the nature and the significance of TMM subtype, and to relate the percentage of sarcomatoid component with survival. The value of staining for BRCA-1-associated protein (BAP1) and CDKN2A(p16) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were also assessed with respect to each of the tumoral components. METHODS The study was conducted by the International Mesothelioma Panel supported by the French National Cancer Institute, the network of rare cancer (EURACAN) and in collaboration with the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). The patient cases include a random group of 42 surgical biopsy samples diagnosed as BMM with evaluation of SMM component by the French Panel of MESOPATH experts was selected from the total series of 971 BMM cases collected from 1998 to 2016. Fourteen international pathologists with expertise in mesothelioma reviewed digitally scanned slides (hematoxylin and eosin - stained and pan-cytokeratin) without knowledge of prior diagnosis or outcome. Cases with at least 7 of 14 pathologists recognizing TMM features were selected as a TMM group. Demographic, clinical, histopathologic, treatment, and follow-up data were retrieved from the MESOBANK database. BAP1 (clone C-4) loss and CDKN2A(p16) homozygous deletion (HD) were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH, respectively. Kappa statistics were applied for interobserver agreement and multivariate analysis with Cox regression adjusted for age and gender was performed for survival analysis. RESULTS The 14 panelists recorded a total of 544 diagnoses. The interobserver correlation was moderate (weighted Kappa = 0.45). Of the cases originally classified as BMM by MESOPATH, the reviewers agreed in 71% of cases (385 of 544 opinions), with cases classified as pure epithelioid in 17% (93 of 544), and pure sarcomatoid in 12% (66 of 544 opinions). Diagnosis of BMM was made on morphology or IHC alone in 23% of the cases and with additional assessment of IHC in 77% (402 of 544). The median overall survival (OS) of the 42 BMM cases was 8 months. The OS for BMM was significantly different from SMM and epithelioid malignant mesothelioma (p < 0.0001). In BMM, a sarcomatoid component of less than 80% correlated with a better survival (p = 0.02). There was a significant difference in survival between BMM with TMM showing a median survival at 6 months compared to 12 months for those without TMM (p < 0.0001). BAP1 loss was observed in 50% (21 of 42) of the total cases and in both components in 26%. We also compared the TMM group to that of more aggressive patterns of epithelioid subtypes of mesothelioma (solid and pleomorphic of our large MESOPATH cohort). The curve of transitional type was persistently close to the OS curve of the sarcomatoid component. The group of sarcomatoid, transitional, and pleomorphic mesothelioma were very close to each other. We then considered the contribution of BAP1 immunostaining and loss of CDKN2A(p16) by FISH. BAP1 loss was observed in 50% (21 of 41) of the total cases and in both component in 27% of the cases (11 of 41). There was no significant difference in BAP1 loss between the TMM and non-TMM groups. HD CDKN2A(p16) was detected in 74% of the total cases with no significant difference between the TMM and non-TMM groups. In multivariate analysis, TMM morphology was an indicator of poor prognosis with a hazard ratio = 3.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.6 - 8.0; and p = 0.003 even when compared to the presence of HD CDKN2A(p16) on sarcomatoid component (hazard ratio = 4.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.2 - 16.3, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The interobserver concordance among the international mesothelioma and French mesothelioma panel suggests clinical utility for an updated definition of biphasic mesothelioma that allows better stratification of patients into risk groups for treatment decisions, systemic anticancer therapy, or selection for surgery or palliation. We also have shown the usefulness of FISH detection of CDKN2A(p16) HD compared to BAP1 loss on the spindle cell component for the separation in ambiguous cases between benign florid stromal reaction from true sarcomatoid component of biphasic mesothelioma. Taken together our results further validate the concept of transitional pattern as a poor prognostic indicator.
Collapse
|
88
|
Rossini M, Rizzo P, Bononi I, Clementz A, Ferrari R, Martini F, Tognon MG. New Perspectives on Diagnosis and Therapy of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Front Oncol 2018; 8:91. [PMID: 29666782 PMCID: PMC5891579 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare, but severe form of cancer, with an incidence that varies significantly within and among different countries around the world. It develops in about one to two persons per million of the general population, leading to thousands of deaths every year worldwide. To date, the MPM is mostly associated with occupational asbestos exposure. Asbestos represents the predominant etiological factor, with approximately 70% of cases of MPM with well-documented occupational exposure to asbestos, with the exposure time, on average greater than 40 years. Environmental exposure to asbestos is increasingly becoming recognized as a cause of mesothelioma, together with gene mutations. The possible roles of other cofactors, such as viral infection and radiation exposure, are still debated. MPM is a fatal tumor. This cancer arises during its early phase without clinical signs. Consequently, its diagnosis occurs at advanced stages. Standard clinical therapeutic approaches include surgery, chemo- and radiotherapies. Preclinical and clinical researches are making great strides in the field of this deadly disease, identifying new biomarkers and innovative therapeutic approaches. Among the newly identified markers and potential therapeutic targets, circulating microRNAs and the Notch pathway represent promising avenues that could result in the early detection of the tumor and novel therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika Rossini
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, School of Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Paola Rizzo
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, School of Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Ilaria Bononi
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, School of Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Anthony Clementz
- Department of Natural Sciences and Geography, Concordia University Chicago, River Forest, IL, United States
| | - Roberto Ferrari
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Internal Medicine and Cardiorespiratory, School of Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.,E.S. Health Science Foundation, GVM Care & Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy
| | - Fernanda Martini
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, School of Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Mauro G Tognon
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, School of Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Waller DA. The management of malignant pleural mesothelioma in the USA 2004-13-a decade of lost opportunity? J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:S1044-S1046. [PMID: 29849196 PMCID: PMC5949425 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David A Waller
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Badiyan SN, Molitoris JK, Zhu M, Glass E, Diwanji T, Simone CB. Proton beam therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2018; 7:189-198. [PMID: 29876318 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.04.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Surgical techniques have made incremental improvements over the last few decades while new systemic therapies, including immunotherapies, show promise as potentially effective novel therapies. Radiation therapy has historically been used only in the palliative setting or as adjuvant therapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy, but recent advances in treatment planning and delivery techniques utilizing intensity-modulated radiation therapy and more recently pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy, have enabled the delivery of radiation therapy as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy after an extended pleurectomy and decortication or as definitive therapy for patients with recurrent or unresectable disease. In particular, PBS proton therapy has the potential to deliver high doses of irradiation to the entire effected pleura while significantly reducing doses to nearby organs at risk. This article describes the evolution of radiation therapy for MPM and details how whole-pleural PBS proton therapy is delivered to patients at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mingyao Zhu
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Erica Glass
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tejan Diwanji
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
91
|
Turaga KK, Deraco M, Alexander HR. Current management strategies for peritoneal mesothelioma. Int J Hyperthermia 2018; 33:579-581. [PMID: 28664790 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1320591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Mesothelioma of the peritoneum is a distinct entity that requires multidisciplinary care to improve oncological outcomes. In this article, we review the current management strategies discussed at the PSOGI meeting in Washington DC 2016 and provide evidence based recommendations for diagnosis and management of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran K Turaga
- a Department of Surgery , University of Chicago , Chicago , IL , USA
| | - Marcello Deraco
- b Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Milano , Milano , Italy
| | - H Richard Alexander
- c Department of Surgical Oncology , University of Maryland Medical Center , Baltimore , MD , USA
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Lang-Lazdunski L. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: some progress, but still a long way from cure. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:1172-1177. [PMID: 29708163 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
93
|
Woolhouse I, Bishop L, Darlison L, De Fonseka D, Edey A, Edwards J, Faivre-Finn C, Fennell DA, Holmes S, Kerr KM, Nakas A, Peel T, Rahman NM, Slade M, Steele J, Tsim S, Maskell NA. British Thoracic Society Guideline for the investigation and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Thorax 2018; 73:i1-i30. [PMID: 29444986 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Woolhouse
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lesley Bishop
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Liz Darlison
- Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Dean A Fennell
- University of Leicester & University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Steve Holmes
- The Park Medical Practice, Shepton Mallet, Somerset, UK
| | | | - Apostolos Nakas
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Tim Peel
- North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields, UK
| | - Najib M Rahman
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Slade
- Papworth Hospital, Thoracic Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Selina Tsim
- Respiratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nick A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Oehl K, Kresoja-Rakic J, Opitz I, Vrugt B, Weder W, Stahel R, Wild P, Felley-Bosco E. Live-Cell Mesothelioma Biobank to Explore Mechanisms of Tumor Progression. Front Oncol 2018. [PMID: 29527515 PMCID: PMC5829086 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Experimental models closely representing in vivo conditions allow investigating mechanisms of resistance. Our aims were to establish a live-cell biobank of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) samples and to obtain proof of principle that primary culture chemoresistant models, mimicking tumor progression observed in patients, can be obtained in vitro, providing a useful tool to investigate underlying mechanisms. Primary mesothelioma cultures were established from 235 samples between 2007 and 2014. Of two MPM patients, primary cultures obtained at different time points: at initial diagnosis, after neoadjuvant treatment at surgery and/or after tumor recurrence, were deeply investigated. Cells and corresponding tumor tissue were characterized by mesothelial protein and gene expression analysis. In addition, primary cultures from chemo naive patients were exposed to increasing doses of cisplatin/pemetrexed during three months and compared with non-treated cells in a cytotoxicity assay, and by selected profiling of senescence markers. In vitro chemoresistance in the primary mesothelioma cell cultures was associated with increased Thy1 (CD90) expression. Thy1 expression in MPM samples was significantly associated with poor overall survival in the TCGA MPM cohort. Our results illustrate that the establishment of a large live-cell MPM biobank contributes to a better understanding of therapy resistance observed in vivo, which eventually may lead to a more logical approach for developing new treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Oehl
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Jelena Kresoja-Rakic
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Opitz
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Bart Vrugt
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Walter Weder
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Rolf Stahel
- Cancer Center Zürich, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Wild
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Emanuela Felley-Bosco
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Na BS, Kim JS, Hyun K, Park IK, Kang CH, Kim YT. Outcomes of the Multimodal Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesiothelioma: The Role of Surgery. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2018; 51:35-40. [PMID: 29430427 PMCID: PMC5796616 DOI: 10.5090/kjtcs.2018.51.1.35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Revised: 09/01/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background The treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is challenging, and multimodal treatment including surgery is recommended; however, the role of surgery is debated. The treatment outcomes of MPM in Korea have not been reported. We analyzed the outcomes of MPM in the context of multimodal treatment, including surgery. Methods The records of 29 patients with pathologically proven MPM from April 1998 to July 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment outcomes of the surgery and non-surgery groups were compared. Results The overall median survival time was 10.6 months, and the overall 3-year survival rate was 25%. No postoperative 30-day or in-hospital mortality occurred in the surgery group. Postoperative complications included tachyarrhythmia (n=4), pulmonary thromboembolism (n=1), pneumonia (n=1), chylothorax (n=1), and wound complications (n=3). The treatment outcomes between the surgery and non-surgery groups were not significantly different (3-year survival rate: 31.3% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p=0.47). In a subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in the treatment outcomes between the extrapleural pneumonectomy group and the non-surgery group (3-year survival rate: 45.5% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p=0.23). Conclusion Multimodal treatment incorporating surgery did not show better outcomes than non-surgical treatment. A nationwide multicenter data registry and prospective randomized controlled studies are necessary to optimize the treatment of MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bub-Se Na
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| | - Ji Seong Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| | - Kwanyong Hyun
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| | - In Kyu Park
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| | - Chang Hyun Kang
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| | - Young Tae Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Spatola C, Militello C, Tocco A, Salamone V, Luigi R, Migliore M, Marletta D, Cannizzaro A, Bevilacqua R, Milone P, Pergolizzi S, Privitera G. Single-institution experience of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma at University of Catania. Future Oncol 2018; 14:17-21. [PMID: 29400553 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The multimodal approach to malignant pleural mesothelioma is gradually becoming the standard of care for this disease in patients with good performance status. Materials & methods: We report our experience concerning eight cases treated with the use of static step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the whole pleural cavity, in patients already undergoing surgical and/or antiblastic therapy. Results & conclusion: Results at a median follow-up of 16 months showed a median survival from the initial treatment of 29 months, with lung toxicity of grade II reported only in two patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corrado Spatola
- Unità Operativa Complessa Radiodiagnostica e Radioterapia, AOU Policlinico-VE, Catania 95125, Italy
| | - Carmelo Militello
- Unità Operativa Complessa Radiodiagnostica e Radioterapia, AOU Policlinico-VE, Catania 95125, Italy
| | - Alessandra Tocco
- Unità Operativa Complessa Radiodiagnostica e Radioterapia, AOU Policlinico-VE, Catania 95125, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Salamone
- Unità Operativa Complessa Radiodiagnostica e Radioterapia, AOU Policlinico-VE, Catania 95125, Italy
| | - Raffaele Luigi
- Unità Operativa Complessa Radiodiagnostica e Radioterapia, AOU Policlinico-VE, Catania 95125, Italy
| | - Marcello Migliore
- Unità Operativa Complessa Chirurgia Toracica, AOU Policlinico-VE, Catania, Italy
| | - Dario Marletta
- Unità Operativa Complessa Radiodiagnostica e Radioterapia, AOU Policlinico-VE, Catania 95125, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cannizzaro
- Unità Operativa Complessa Radiodiagnostica e Radioterapia, AOU Policlinico-VE, Catania 95125, Italy
| | - Roberta Bevilacqua
- Unità Operativa Complessa Radiodiagnostica e Radioterapia, AOU Policlinico-VE, Catania 95125, Italy
| | - Pietro Milone
- Unità Operativa Complessa Radiodiagnostica e Radioterapia, AOU Policlinico-VE, Catania 95125, Italy
| | - Stefano Pergolizzi
- Unità Operativa Complessa Radioterapia, AOU Policlinico, Messina 98124, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Privitera
- Unità Operativa Complessa Radiodiagnostica e Radioterapia, AOU Policlinico-VE, Catania 95125, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Nuvoli B, Camera E, Mastrofrancesco A, Briganti S, Galati R. Modulation of reactive oxygen species via ERK and STAT3 dependent signalling are involved in the response of mesothelioma cells to exemestane. Free Radic Biol Med 2018; 115:266-277. [PMID: 29229551 DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Revised: 11/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma is a deadly form of cancer. The prognosis is extremely poor due to the limited treatment modalities. Uptake of asbestos fibres, the leading cause of mesothelioma, lead to the accumulation of reactive-oxygen-species (ROS). Interestingly, increasing ROS production by using ROS-generating drugs may offer a strategy to selectively trigger cell death. Exemestane, an aromatase inhibitor, has previously shown anti-tumor properties in mesothelioma preclinical models suggesting a role of G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) in the drug response. As exemestane, in addition to blocking estrogen biosynthesis, generates ROS that are able to arrest the growth of breast cancer, we explored the role of ROS, antioxidant defense system, and ROS-induced signalling pathways in mesothelioma cells during exemestane response. Here we report that exemestane treatment reduced cell proliferation with an increase in ROS production and reduction of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels in MSTO-H211, Ist-Mes1, Ist-Mes2 and MPP89 exemestane-sensitive mesothelioma cell lines, but not in NCI-H2452 exemestane-insensitive mesothelioma cells. Exemestane induced a significant antioxidant response in NCI-H2452 cells, as highlighted by an increase in γ-glutamylcysteine levels, catalase (Cat), superoxide-dismutase and (SOD) and glutathione-peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity and nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) activation, responsible for drug insensitivity. Conversely, exemestane elevated ROS levels along with increased ERK phosphorylation and a reduction of p-STA3 in exemestane-sensitive mesothelioma cells. ROS generation was the crucial event of exemestane action because ROS inhibitor N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) abrogated p-ERK and p-STAT3 modulation and cellular death. Exemestane also modulates ERK and STAT3 signalling via GPR30. Results indicate an essential role of ROS in the antiproliferative action of exemestane in mesothelioma cells. It is likely that the additional oxidative insults induced by exemestane results in the lethal effects of mesothelioma cells by increasing ROS production. As such, manipulating ROS levels with exemestane seems to be a feasible strategy to selectively kill mesothelioma cells with less toxicity to normal cells by regulating ERK and STAT3 activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Nuvoli
- Preclinical Models and New Therapeutic Agent Unit, Translational Research Functional Departmental Area, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome 00144, Italy
| | - Emanuela Camera
- Laboratory of Skin Physiopathology and Integrated Centre for Metabolomics San Gallicano Dermatologic Institute (IRCCS), Rome 00144, Italy
| | - Arianna Mastrofrancesco
- Laboratory of Skin Physiopathology and Integrated Centre for Metabolomics San Gallicano Dermatologic Institute (IRCCS), Rome 00144, Italy
| | - Stefania Briganti
- Laboratory of Skin Physiopathology and Integrated Centre for Metabolomics San Gallicano Dermatologic Institute (IRCCS), Rome 00144, Italy
| | - Rossella Galati
- Preclinical Models and New Therapeutic Agent Unit, Translational Research Functional Departmental Area, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome 00144, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer largely associated with asbestos exposure. In this review, we will discuss the significant advancements in our understanding of its genetics and molecular biology and their translational relevance. Remarkable findings included the discovery of germline and somatic mutations of BRCA1 associated protein-1 (BAP1) in patients, and the genome-wide characterization of pathways altered in mesothelioma that could be potentially exploited to design novel therapeutic approaches. Nevertheless, the clinical translation of these molecular findings has been slow and insufficient. In order to rapidly move translation from the bench to the bedside, we believe that cooperative research efforts have to be further endorsed and promoted at all levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Napolitano
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, University of Hawai i Cancer Center, 96826 Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Michele Carbone
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, University of Hawai i Cancer Center, 96826 Honolulu, HI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Kindler HL, Ismaila N, Armato SG, Bueno R, Hesdorffer M, Jahan T, Jones CM, Miettinen M, Pass H, Rimner A, Rusch V, Sterman D, Thomas A, Hassan R. Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1343-1373. [PMID: 29346042 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.6394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 262] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, pathology, imaging, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2017. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. Results The literature search identified 222 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Recommendations Evidence-based recommendations were developed for diagnosis, staging, chemotherapy, surgical cytoreduction, radiation therapy, and multimodality therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedy L Kindler
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samuel G Armato
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mary Hesdorffer
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Thierry Jahan
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Clyde Michael Jones
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Markku Miettinen
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Harvey Pass
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie Rusch
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Sterman
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anish Thomas
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Abdel‐Rahman O, Elsayed Z, Mohamed H, Eltobgy M. Radical multimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 1:CD012605. [PMID: 29309720 PMCID: PMC6491325 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012605.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an almost always fatal tumour, for which palliative platinum-based chemotherapy is currently the standard treatment. Multimodal therapeutic strategies incorporating surgery, radiation therapy or photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy have been recommended for selected patients but there is no consensus about their effectiveness. OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of radical multimodal treatment options (including radical surgery ± radical radiotherapy ± photodynamic therapy ± systemic therapy) compared to each other or to palliative treatments, for people with malignant pleural mesothelioma. SEARCH METHODS We reviewed data from the Cochrane Lung Cancer group's Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase. We also checked reference lists of primary original studies, review articles and relevant conference proceedings manually for further related articles up to 21 March 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA We included parallel-group randomised controlled trials of multimodal therapy for people with malignant pleural mesothelioma (stages I, II or III) that measured at least one of the following endpoints: overall survival, health-related health-related quality of life, adverse events or progression-free survival. We considered studies regardless of language or publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted relevant information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcomes, and data on the outcomes for this review, as well as information on the design and methodology of the studies. Two review authors assessed the risk of bias in the included trials using pre-defined 'Risk of bias' domains. We assessed the methodological quality using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We conducted this review in accordance with the published Cochrane protocol. Two randomised clinical trials with 104 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Both trials were at high risk of bias (for outcomes other than overall survival), and we rated the evidence as moderate quality for overall survival and low quality for all other outcomes. One trial compared combined extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) plus neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy plus postoperative high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy with combined EPP plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The other trial compared EPP plus postoperative hemithoracic radiotherapy with standard (non-radical) therapy alone following platinum-based chemotherapy (patients in the standard therapy arm received continued oncological management according to local policy, which could include further chemotherapy or palliative radiotherapy).For the first trial, median overall survival calculated from registration was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.4 to 27.8) in the no-radiotherapy group and 19.3 months (95% CI 11.5 to 21.8) in the radiotherapy group. For the second trial, median overall survival was 14.4 months (95% CI 5.3 to 18.7) for patients allocated to EPP and 19.5 months (95% CI 13.4 to time not yet reached) for patients randomised to standard non-radical therapy. In the second trial, 12 serious adverse events were reported during the study period: ten in the EPP group and two in the non-radical therapy group. Overall health-related quality of life scores were not different between the two arms in either study. We could not perform a meta-analysis of the two included trials due to clinical heterogeneity. We also identified three ongoing trials evaluating the topic of our review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The overall strength of the evidence gathered in this review is low and there is a lack of available evidence to support the use of radical multimodality therapy in routine clinical practice (particularly as one trial suggests greater harm). Given the added cost of multimodality treatment and the possible increase in risk of adverse effects, the lack of evidence of their effectiveness probably means that these interventions should currently be limited to clinical trials alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Abdel‐Rahman
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityClinical OncologyLofty Elsayed StreetCairoEgypt11335
| | - Zeinab Elsayed
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityClinical OncologyLofty Elsayed StreetCairoEgypt11335
| | - Hadeer Mohamed
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityEl methaq Street, Madinet NasrCairoEgypt11371
| | - Mostafa Eltobgy
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityEl methaq Street, Madinet NasrCairoEgypt11371
| | | |
Collapse
|