Osimertinib for pretreated EGFR Thr790Met-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (AURA2): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study

Efficacy of Osimertinib Continuation Plus Metronomic Oral Vinorelbine for EGFRmutant Advanced NSCLC Beyond Limited Progression on Osimertinib

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after osimertinib failure are limited, and osimertinib continuation is recommended for selected patients. Metronomic oral vinorelbine is an effective treatment with less toxicity for advanced NSCLC.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of osimertinib plus metronomic oral vinorelbine on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced NSCLC beyond limited progression on osimertinib.

METHODS

We have reviewed the medical records of 28 patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC who had received osimertinib continuation plus metronomic oral vinorelbine beyond limited progression on osimertinib. We also evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics of enrolled patients, as well as the efficacy and toxicity of the treatment.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up period of 14.1 months, 57.1% (16/28) of cases showed NSCLC progression. The median progression-free survival (PFS) period under osimertinib plus metronomic oral vinorelbine was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval, 1.562-17.238 months), with a disease control rate of 89.3% and objective response rate of 17.9%. PFS did not differ between patients who had previously received osimertinib as first- (n = 16) and second-line (n = 12) therapy (median, 11.4 and 4.7 months, P = 0.391). In addition, the median PFS duration did not differ according to the efficacy (PFS2 ≥ 6 months vs. <6 months) of previous osimertinib monotherapy (median, 5.8 and 9.4 months, P = 0.677).

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib continuation in conjunction with metronomic oral vinorelbine may enable overcoming TKI resistance and prolong the survival of patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC beyond limited progression on osimertinib treatment.

Successful Rechallenge with Osimertinib following Osimertinib-Induced Ventricular Tachycardia: A Case Report

Osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. It is known to cause drug-induced cardiotoxicity, including QT prolongation syndrome, heart failure, and ventricular arrhythmias, which can lead to sudden death. Once severe arrhythmias occur, it is difficult to continue osimertinib treatment. We report a case of a 66-year-old woman with recurrent NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy who experienced osimertinib-induced ventricular arrhythmia-causing syncope. The patient was initially treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and genetic testing revealed EGFR exon 19 deletion. Three years following treatment initiation, the primary tumor progressed, and new bone metastases developed. The patient was diagnosed with recurrent NSCLC and was treated with targeted therapy with osimertinib. On the 10th day of osimertinib administration, syncope occurred. Electrocardiography showed polymorphic non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, which was believed to be the cause of syncope. The patient was switched to erlotinib. Two and a half years later, disease progression in the primary lesion was observed. A liquid biopsy revealed an EGFR T790M resistance mutation. Therefore, osimertinib (40 mg) was administered every alternate day. After confirming the absence of palpitations and arrhythmias on electrocardiogram, the osimertinib dosing was increased to 40 mg daily. Thereafter, no further events occurred, and tumor shrinkage was observed. Low-dose osimertinib rechallenge after induced ventricular arrhythmia may be considered an option under close monitoring; however, osimertinib rechallenge must be carefully selected based on the risk-benefit analysis.

Possible heart failure caused by osimertinib in a lung cancer patient

Introduction

Osimertinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It has demonstrated better results concerning effectiveness than other TKIs for the same indication. However, despite a good safety profile, it could produce some cardiotoxicity that does not occur with other drugs of the same group.

Case report

We report the evolution and management of a female patient diagnosed with NSCLC who developed a grade 3 cardiotoxicity due to treatment with osimertinib. This patient suffered from a left bundle branch block, dyslipidemia, and hypertension as cardiovascular risk factors. After a long period of treatment with osimertinib, she developed a severe heart failure (HF) with an important decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), which triggered an admission to the oncology unit for eight days.

Management and outcomes

Treatment with osimertinib was first suspended and then resumed after stabilization of the HF. She also developed atrial fibrillation during admission and has required narrow cardiac monitoring and management since the debut of the HF. After evaluating the benefit-risk balance, osimertinib was reintroduced and the patient continues in treatment at the moment, although the baseline LVEF is not recovered.

Discussion

There is scarce evidence in the literature concerning HF and important LVEF decrease due to osimertinib. However, its severity and repercussion for the patient justify the thorough screening of cardiovascular risk factors before starting the therapy.

Therapeutic strategies for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients with osimertinib resistance

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the preferential options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations. Osimertinib is a potent irreversible third-generation EGFR-TKI targeting EGFR mutations but has little effect on wild-type EGFR. In view of its remarkable efficacy and manageable safety, osimertinib was recommended as the standard first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. However, as the other EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib will inevitably develop acquired resistance, which limits its efficacy on the treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. The etiology of triggering osimertinib resistance is complex including EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent pathways, and different therapeutic strategies for the NSCLC patients with osimertinib resistance have been developed. Herein, we comprehensively summarized the resistance mechanisms of osimertinib and discuss in detail the potential therapeutic strategies for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients suffering osimertinib resistance for the sake of the improvement of survival and further achievement of precise medicine.

Osimertinib and Bevacizumab Cotreatment for Untreated EGFR-Mutated NSCLC With Malignant Pleural or Pericardial Effusion (SPIRAL II): A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Introduction

First-line treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC with erlotinib plus antiangiogenic inhibitor exhibits promising results. However, the efficacy of this combination has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC complicated with malignant pleural or pericardial effusion (MPE) for whom combination therapy may be particularly effective.

Methods

This single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of the bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) and osimertinib (80 mg) combination in the first-line setting for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with MPE. The primary end point of this study was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points were objective response rate, PFS, overall survival, drainage-free survival without the need for thoracic or pericardial drainage, and safety.

Results

Between January 2019 and August 2020, a total of 31 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC were enrolled from Japan in the study. The median PFS was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3–11.3), the 1-year PFS was 32.1% (80% CI: 21.4–43.3), and the objective response rate was 74.2% (95% CI: 56.8–86.3). The median overall survival was not reached. The median drainage-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI: 10.3–not estimable). Anorexia was the most common grade 3 or higher adverse event (four patients, 12.9%), followed by fatigue and dyspnea (three patients, 9.7%). No treatment-related deaths were recorded.

Conclusions

Osimertinib and bevacizumab combination in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with MPE were safe but did not effectively increase PFS when compared with the inferred value from previous literature.

Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threatening complication that may exacerbate cancer prognosis. Whilst some studies indicate an increased risk of VTE in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, the prevalence estimates on the pooled prevalence of VTE in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy are not known. This study aims to calculate the pooled prevalence of VTE in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients. Methods: Studies on VTE occurrence in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy were retrieved after database search. The terms used included “cancer”, “chemotherapy”, and “venous thromboembolism”. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to obtain a pooled estimate of VTE prevalence in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Results: A total of 102 eligible studies involving 30,671 patients (1773 with VTE, 28,898 without) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimate of VTE prevalence was found to be 6%, ranging from 6% to 7% (ES 6%; 95% CI 6−7%; z = 18.53; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The estimated pooled prevalence rate of VTEs was 6% in cancer patients undergoing CRT, which was higher than the overall crude prevalence rate (5.78%). Comprehensive cancer care should consider stratified VTE risk assessment based on cancer phenotype, given that certain phenotypes of cancer such as bladder, gastric and ovarian posing particularly high risks of VTE.

Mechanisms of EGFR-TKI-Induced Apoptosis and Strategies Targeting Apoptosis in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Homeostasis is achieved by balancing cell survival and death. In cancer cells, especially those carrying driver mutations, the processes and signals that promote apoptosis are inhibited, facilitating the survival and proliferation of these dysregulated cells. Apoptosis induction is an important mechanism underlying the therapeutic efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the mechanisms by which EGFR-TKIs induce apoptosis have not been fully elucidated. A deeper understanding of the apoptotic pathways induced by EGFR-TKIs is essential for the developing novel strategies to overcome resistance to EGFR-TKIs or to enhance the initial efficacy through therapeutic synergistic combinations. Recently, therapeutic strategies targeting apoptosis have been developed for cancer. Here, we review the state of knowledge on EGFR-TKI-induced apoptotic pathways and discuss the therapeutic strategies for enhancing EGFR-TKI efficiency. We highlight the great progress achieved with third-generation EGFR-TKIs. In particular, combination therapies of EGFR-TKIs with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/receptor inhibitors or chemotherapy have emerged as promising therapeutic strategies for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Nevertheless, further breakthroughs are needed to yield an appropriate standard care for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, which requires gaining a deeper understanding of cancer cell dynamics in response to EGFR-TKIs.

A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) events for osimertinib

Osimertinib was a third-generation, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), which approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2015 for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study was to explore the adverse events (AEs) caused by osimertinib through data mining of the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), and provide reference for clinical safety. Data of osimertinib were collected from the FAERS database covering the period from first quarter of 2016 to the fourth quarter of 2021. Disproportionality analyses was employed to quantify the associated AE signals of osimertinib and detect the risk signals from the data in the FAERS database. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to detect the risk signals from the data in the FAERS database. The definition relied on system organ class (SOCs) and preferred terms (PTs) by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Totally, 9,704,33 reports were collected from the FAERS database, 10,804 reports of osimertinib were identified as the 'primary suspected (PS)' AEs. Osimertinib induced AEs occurred in 27 organ systems. 68 significant disproportionality PTs satisfying with the four algorithms were retained at the same time. Unexpected significant AEs such as scrotal volvulus, hepatic function abnormal, venous thromboembolisms might also occur. The median onset time of osimertinib-associated AEs was 58 days (interquartile range [IQR] 14-212 days), and the majority of the AEs occurred within the first 30 days after osimertinib initiation. Our study found significant new AEs signals of osimertinib and might provide support for clinical monitoring and risk identification of osimertinib.

Efficacy and Safety of Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic/Recurrent EGFR T790M-Mutated NSCLC: A Phase 2b Study

INTRODUCTION

Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) is a novel third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting both EGFR-sensitizing mutations and EGFR T790M mutation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rezivertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent NSCLC with confirmed EGFR T790M mutation who progressed after first-/second-generation EGFR TKI therapy or primary EGFR T790M mutation were enrolled. Patients received rezivertinib at 180 mg orally once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03812809).

RESULTS

A total of 226 patients were enrolled from July 5, 2019, to January 22, 2020. By the data cutoff date on January 24, 2022, the median duration of follow-up was 23.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.8-24.0). The ORR by blinded independent central review was 64.6% (95% CI: 58.0%-70.8%), and DCR was 89.8% (95% CI: 85.1%-93.4%). The median duration of response was 12.5 months (95% CI: 10.0-13.9), and median PFS was 12.2 months (95% CI: 9.6-13.9). The median overall survival was 23.9 months (95% CI: 20.0-not calculated [NC]). Among 91 (40.3%) patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the median CNS PFS was 16.6 months (95% CI: 11.1-NC). In 29 patients with more than or equal to one brain target lesion at baseline, the CNS ORR and CNS DCR were 69.0% (95% CI: 49.2%-84.7%) and 100% (95% CI: 88.1%-100%), respectively. Time to progression of CNS was 16.5 months (95% CI: 9.7-NC). Of 226 patients, 188 (83.2%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event, whereas grade more than or equal to 3 occurred in 45 (19.9%) patients. No interstitial lung disease was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Rezivertinib was found to have promising efficacy and favorable safety profile for patients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent NSCLC with EGFR T790M mutation.

Plasma RNA profiling unveils transcriptional signatures associated with resistance to osimertinib in EGFR T790M positive non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapy with tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKIs) against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is part of routine clinical practice for EGFR mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. These patients eventually develop resistance, frequently accompanied by a gatekeeper mutation, T790M. Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR TKI displaying potency to the T790M resistance mutation. Here we aimed to analyze if exosomal RNAs, isolated from longitudinally sampled plasma of osimertinib-treated EGFR T790M NSCLC patients, could provide biomarkers of acquired resistance to osimertinib.

METHODS

Plasma was collected at baseline and progression of disease from 20 patients treated with osimertinib in the multicenter phase II study TKI in Relapsed EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients (TREM). Plasma was centrifuged at 16,000 g followed by exosomal RNA extraction using Qiagen exoRNeasy kit. RNA was subjected to transcriptomics analysis with Clariom D.

RESULTS

Transcriptome profiling revealed differential expression [log2(fold-change) >0.25, false discovery rate (FDR) P<0.15, and P(interaction) >0.05] of 128 transcripts. We applied network enrichment analysis (NEA) at the pathway level in a large collection of functional gene sets. This overall enrichment analysis revealed alterations in pathways related to EGFR and PI3K as well as to syndecan and glypican pathways (NEA FDR <3×10-10). When applied to the 40 individual, sample-specific gene sets, the NEA detected 16 immune-related gene sets (FDR <0.25, P(interaction) >0.05 and NEA z-score exceeding 3 in at least one sample).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates a potential usability of plasma-derived exosomal RNAs to characterize molecular phenotypes of emerging osimertinib resistance. Furthermore, it highlights the involvement of multiple RNA species in shaping the transcriptome landscape of osimertinib-refractory NSCLC patients.

Liquid Biopsy: A Multi-Parametric Analysis of Mutation Status, Circulating Tumor Cells and Inflammatory Markers in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

The liquid biopsy has the potential to improve patient care in the diagnostic and therapeutic setting in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Consented patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positive disease (n = 21) were stratified into two cohorts: those currently receiving EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy (n = 9) and newly diagnosed EGFR TKI treatment-naïve patients (n = 12). Plasma genotyping of cell-free DNA was carried out using the FDA-approved cobas® EGFR mutation test v2 and compared to next generation sequencing (NGS) cfDNA panels. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) numbers were correlated with treatment response and EGFR exon 20 p.T790M. The prognostic significance of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was also investigated. Patients in cohort 1 with an EGFR exon 20 p.T790M mutation progressed more rapidly than those with an EGFR sensitizing mutation, while patients in cohort 2 had a significantly longer progression-free survival (p = 0.04). EGFR exon 20 p.T790M was detected by liquid biopsy prior to disease progression indicated by computed tomography (CT) imaging. The cobas® EGFR mutation test detected a significantly greater number of exon 20 p.T790M mutations (p = 0.05). High NLR and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) were associated with shorter time to progression and worse survival outcomes (p < 0.05). High LDH levels were significantly associated with shorter time to disease progression (p = 0.03). These data support the use of liquid biopsy for monitoring EGFR mutations and inflammatory markers as prognostic indicators in NSCLC.

Survival of Lung Cancer Patients by Histopathology in Taiwan from 2010 to 2016: A Nationwide Study

Objective: Lung cancer poses a tremendous threat to the modern world. According to Taiwan’s Ministry of Health and Welfare, lung cancer took first place in total cancer deaths in 2021. This study investigated the overall lung cancer survival based on histopathology between 2010 and 2016 in Taiwan. Method: Data from 2010 to 2016 was collected from the Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR). The characteristics and overall survival of 71,334 lung cancer patients were analyzed according to the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) 7th staging system. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify differences in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival between different histopathologies of lung cancer. Results: The 1-year overall survival rate increased from 54.07% in 2010 to 66.14% in 2016. The 3-year overall survival rate increased from 26.57% in 2010 to 41.12% in 2016 in all patients. Among the histopathologies of lung cancer, 3-year overall survival of adenocarcinoma patients increased the most and largely contributed to the increased 3-year overall survival of all lung cancer patients. Conclusions: The introduction of target therapy has led to a tremendous increase in overall survival for lung adenocarcinoma patients. However, target therapy differs by histopathology. Choosing the right target therapy and determining the correct histopathology of lung cancer is a pivotal key in increasing the overall survival of patients. Together with immune therapy, the landscape of lung cancer treatments is changing.

Liquid Biopsy Analysis as a Tool for TKI-Based Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has recently evolved with the introduction of targeted therapy based on the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with certain gene alterations, including EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, and MET genes. Molecular targeted therapy based on TKIs has improved clinical outcomes in a large number of NSCLC patients with advanced disease, enabling significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS). Liquid biopsy is an increasingly popular diagnostic tool for treating TKI-based NSCLC. The studies presented in this article show that detection and analysis based on liquid biopsy elements such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), exosomes, and/or tumor-educated platelets (TEPs) can contribute to the appropriate selection and monitoring of targeted therapy in NSCLC patients as complementary to invasive tissue biopsy. The detection of these elements, combined with their molecular analysis (using, e.g., digital PCR (dPCR), next generation sequencing (NGS), shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS)), enables the detection of mutations, which are required for the TKI treatment. Despite such promising results obtained by many research teams, it is still necessary to carry out prospective studies on a larger group of patients in order to validate these methods before their application in clinical practice.

Efficacy and potential resistance mechanisms of afatinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR G719X/L861Q/S768I

BACKGROUND

Afatinib is the only currently approved EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR G719X/L861Q/S768I. However, there are limited real-world data concerning the benefits and resistance mechanisms of afatinib in patients with these nonclassical mutations. To fill this gap, the present study was conducted.

METHODS

All NSCLC patients treated with afatinib were screened, and patients with EGFR G719X/L861Q/S768I were enrolled into the analysis. Either tumor tissue or blood specimens were detected by the commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels or amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to figure out the mutation genotype.

RESULTS

A total of 106 advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR G719X/L861Q/S768I received afatinib treatment. The benefits of afatinib exhibited heterogeneity in different mutation genotypes. Notably, at baseline, NGS testing was performed in 59 patients, and TP53 was the most frequently coexisting mutation. Patients with TP53 mutations obtained fewer survival benefits than those with TP53 wild-type. A total of 68 patients ultimately experienced progression, and 27 patients received NGS testing to clarify the potential resistance mechanisms. EGFR-T790M, CDK4 amplification, FGFR1 amplification, PIK3CA, MET amplification, RET fusions, HER2, and BRAF mutations were identified in three (11.1%), three (11.1%), three (11.1%), three (11.1%), three (11.1%), one (3.7%), one (3.7%), and one (3.7%) of the cases, respectively. Five patients underwent ARMS-PCR testing for detecting EGFR-T790M mutation, and only one patient was T790M-positive.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study elucidated the differential benefits of afatinib within different mutation genotypes and first revealed the spectrum of potential resistance mechanisms in patients with EGFR G719X/L861Q/S768I. The results of this study may provide practical clinical information that can guide optimal treatment in this setting.

A Real-World Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Therapy After Osimertinib Treatment in Patients With EGFR-Mutant NSCLC

Introduction

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy has increased the survival of patients with advanced NSCLC. Nevertheless, the efficacy of ICI treatment for NSCLC with EGFR mutations is limited. Previous studies have not evaluated the efficacy of ICI treatment after osimertinib treatment in real-world settings.

Methods

This study performed a retrospective analysis of the association between clinical characteristics and ICI efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with ICIs after osimertinib treatment at 12 institutions in Japan from March 2016 to March 2021.

Results

Among 80 patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer, 42 received ICI monotherapy and 38 received chemoimmunotherapy. In the chemoimmunotherapy group, the progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the group that exhibited PFS more than 10 months with osimertinib than in the group that exhibited PFS less than or equal to 10 months with osimertinib (8.4 mo versus 3.8 mo, p = 0.026). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in PFS in the ICI monotherapy group (1.7 mo versus 1.5 mo, p = 0.45). Regardless of the EGFR mutation subtype, PFS of osimertinib treatment was a predictor of the PFS of chemoimmunotherapy (exon 19 deletion mutation: p = 0.03 and exon 21 L858R mutation: p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The PFS of osimertinib might be a predictor of PFS of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Further clinical investigations on the predictors of efficacy of administering ICIs after osimertinib treatment are required.

PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and immune cell infiltration in non-small cell lung cancer patients with epithelial growth factor receptor mutations

Background

Immunotherapy using programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors seems less effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Varied responses to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have recently been observed in NSCLC patients harboring different types of EGFR mutations. Some EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients may benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. At present, PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) are biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in NSCLC patients. We retrospectively evaluated PD-L1 expression, TMB, and immune cell infiltration in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation subtypes.

Methods

PD-L1 expression, TMB, and the abundance of immune cell infiltration in NSCLC patients were evaluated in public databases and clinical samples. TMB was detected using the NGS technique, PD-L1 was detected using immunohistochemistry, and the abundance of immune cell infiltration in NSCLC samples was detected using multiple immunohistochemistry.

Results

PD-L1 expression and TMB were lower in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs than in wild-type patients. Differences in the abundance of immune cell infiltration were also observed between EGFR-mutated and wild-type NSCLC. The expression of PD-L1, TMB, and abundance of immune cell infiltration were different in patients harboring different subtypes of EGFR mutations. Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, especially the G719X mutation, showed higher TMB and expressions of PD-L1 than classical EGFR mutations. M1 macrophages were higher in uncommon EGFR mutations than classical EGFR mutations.

Conclusions

The expression of PD-L1 and TMB in uncommon EGFR-mutated NSCLCs, especially the G719X mutation, were higher than those for classical EGFR-mutated NSCLCs and similar to EGFR wild-type. The abundance of immune cell infiltration in uncommon EGFR-mutated NSCLCs was similar to that in EGFR wild-type. Our findings suggest that uncommon EGFR-mutated NSCLCs may benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Ras-Related Protein Rab-32 and Thrombospondin 1 Confer Resistance to the EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Osimertinib by Activating Focal Adhesion Kinase in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor and the standard of care therapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR-activating mutations. However, even for patients treated with osimertinib, resistance inevitably occurs leading to disease progression. Here, we utilized two osimertinib-resistant cell lines and investigated their RNA profiles. We found that Ras-related protein Rab-32 (RAB32) and thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) were upregulated and associated with resistance in osimertinib-resistant cells as well as in liquid biopsies from patients with disease progression following osimertinib treatment. Moreover, we found RAB32 and THBS1 to be mechanistically linked to activation of the focal adhesion pathway where combination of osimertinib with a FAK inhibitor resulted in a synergistic suppression of viability of osimertinib-resistant cells. Our findings propose a potential therapeutic strategy for overcoming acquired resistance to osimertinib in non-small cell lung cancer.

Abstract

Treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib is the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Osimertinib is also used in T790M-positive NSCLC that may occur de novo or be acquired following first-line treatment with other EGFR TKIs (i.e., gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, or dacomitinib). However, patients treated with osimertinib have a high risk of developing resistance to the treatment. A substantial fraction of the mechanisms for resistance is unknown and may involve RNA and/or protein alterations. In this study, we investigated the full transcriptome of parental and osimertinib-resistant cell lines, revealing 131 differentially expressed genes. Knockdown screening of the genes upregulated in resistant cell lines uncovered eight genes to partly confer resistance to osimertinib. Among them, we detected the expression of Ras-related protein Rab-32 (RAB32) and thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) in plasmas sampled at baseline and at disease progression from EGFR-positive NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib. Both genes were upregulated in progression samples. Moreover, we found that knockdown of RAB32 and THBS1 reduced the expression of phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Combination of osimertinib with a FAK inhibitor resulted in synergistic toxicity in osimertinib-resistant cells, suggesting a potential therapeutic drug combination for overcoming resistance to osimertinib in NSCLC patients.

Real-World Clinical Outcomes after Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Comprehensive genomic profiling for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can identify patients for molecularly targeted therapies that improve clinical outcomes. We analyzed data from 3084 patients (median age 65 years, 72.9% with adenocarcinoma) with advanced NSCLC registered in a real-world healthcare claims database (GuardantINFORMTM, Guardant Health) who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing (Guardant360®, Guardant Health) after first-line therapy (28.0% with agents targeted against genomic alterations). ctDNA was detected in 2771 samples (89.9%), of which 41.9% harbored actionable alterations, most commonly EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutations (29.7%). Actionable alterations were detected in 26.7% of patients (534/2001) previously treated with non-targeted agents. Emerging potentially targetable mutations were found in 40.1% (309/770) of patients previously treated with targeted therapies. Among patients with qualifying alterations detected by ctDNA testing, the time to treatment discontinuation (median 8.8 vs. 4.2 months; hazard ratio 1.97, p < 0.001) and overall survival (median 36.1 vs. 16.6 months; hazard ratio 2.08, p < 0.001) were longer for those who received matched second-line therapy versus unmatched second-line therapy. In real-world practice, results of a blood-based NGS assay prior to second-line treatment inform therapeutic decisions that can improve clinical outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC.

High dose osimertinib in patients with advanced stage EGFR exon 20 mutation-positive NSCLC: Results from the phase 2 multicenter POSITION20 trial

INTRODUCTION

Patients with life-threatening advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbor an exon 20 deletion and/or insertion mutation (EGFRex20 + ) have limited effective treatment options. The high dose 3rd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib shows promising in vitro activity in EGFRex20 + NSCLC tumors.

METHODS

The POSITION20 is a single arm phase II, multicenter study investigating 160 mg osimertinib in patients with EGFRex20+, T790M negative NSCLC. We allowed patients to be treatment naïve and to have asymptomatic brain metastases. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary outcomes were duration of response (DoR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment related adverse events (trAEs).

RESULTS

From June 2018 to October 2021, 25 patients were enrolled across five centers in the Netherlands. The median age was 70 years (range, 47-87), 20 patients (80%) were women, and the median number of previous lines of therapy was 1 (range, 0-3). The exon 20 mutations were clustered between A763 and L777. The most common exon 20 mutations were p.(N771_H773dup) (n = 3) and p.(A767_V769dup) (n = 3). The ORR was 28% (95% CI, 12-49%), including seven partial responses, with a median DoR of 5.3 months (range, 2.7-27.6). The median PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.6-9.1) and the median OS was 15.2 months (95% CI, 14.3-16.0). The most common trAEs were diarrhea (72%), dry skin (44%), and fatigue (44%). The primary reason for discontinuation was progressive disease in 14 patients (56%).

CONCLUSION

The POSITION20 study showed modest antitumor activity in patients with EGFRex20 + NSCLC treated with 160 mg osimertinib, with a confirmed ORR of 28% and acceptable toxicity.

Predictors of Lung Adenocarcinoma With Leptomeningeal Metastases: A 2022 Targeted-Therapy-Assisted molGPA Model

Objective

To explore prognostic indicators of lung adenocarcinoma with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) and provide an updated graded prognostic assessment model integrated with molecular alterations (molGPA).

Methods

A cohort of 162 patients was enrolled from 202 patients with lung adenocarcinoma and LM. By randomly splitting data into the training (80%) and validation (20%) sets, the Cox regression and random survival forest methods were used on the training set to identify statistically significant variables and construct a prognostic model. The C-index of the model was calculated and compared with that of previous molGPA models.

Results

The Cox regression and random forest models both identified four variables, which included KPS, LANO neurological assessment, TKI therapy line, and controlled primary tumor, as statistically significant predictors. A novel targeted-therapy-assisted molGPA model (2022) using the above four prognostic factors was developed to predict LM of lung adenocarcinoma. The C-indices of this prognostic model in the training and validation sets were higher than those of the lung-molGPA (2017) and molGPA (2019) models.

Conclusions

The 2022 molGPA model, a substantial update of previous molGPA models with better prediction performance, may be useful in clinical decision making and stratification of future clinical trials.

Efficacy of Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer With Different T790M Status Following Resistance to Prior EGFR-TKIs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M-negative/unknown advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients lack subsequent approved targeted therapies. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of osimertinib in advanced NSCLC patients with different T790M status after resistance to prior first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and to predict the subgroups that may benefit beside T790M-positive disease.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant trials. Meeting abstracts were also reviewed to identify appropriate studies. Studies evaluating the efficacy and/or survival outcomes of osimertinib in patients with different T790M status (positive, negative, or unknown) after resistance to prior first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs were enrolled, and data were pooled to assess hazard ratios (HRs) or relative risk ratios (RRs) in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR).

Results

A total of 1,313 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients from 10 retrospective and one prospective studies treated with osimertinib after resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs were included. In overall groups, T790M-positive patients showed an improved OS (HR=0.574, p=0.015), PFS (HR = 0.476, p = 0.017), and ORR (RR = 2.025, p = 0.000) compared with T790M-negative patients. In the brain metastases subgroup, no significant difference in OS was observed between T790M-positive and T790M-negative patients (HR = 0.75, p = 0.449) or between T790M-positive and T790M-unknown patients (HR = 0.90, p = 0.673). In the plasma genotyping subgroup, PFS was similar between T790M-positive and T790M-negative patients (HR = 1.033, p = 0.959).

Conclusion

Patients with progressive brain metastases on first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs can benefit from subsequent osimertinib therapy regardless of T790M status. Patients with plasma T790M-negative status and lack of tissue genotyping should be allowed to receive osimertinib treatment.

A phase 1b/2 study of PF-06747775 as monotherapy or in combination with Palbociclib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

This Phase 1/2 study (NCT02349633) explored the safety and antitumor activity of PF-06747775 (oral, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after progression on an EGFR inhibitor.

METHODS

Phase 1 was a dose-escalation study of PF-06747775 monotherapy (starting dose: 25 mg once daily [QD]). Phase 1b/2 evaluated PF-06747775 monotherapy at recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D; Cohort 1); PF-06747775 200 mg QD plus palbociclib (starting dose: 100 mg QD orally; Cohort 2A); and PF-06747775 monotherapy at RP2D in a Japanese lead-in cohort.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were treated. Median treatment duration was 40.1 weeks. Monotherapy maximum tolerated dose was not determined. Two patients in Cohort 2A had dose-limiting toxicities. The monotherapy RP2D was estimated to be 200 mg QD. Most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (69.2%), paronychia (69.2%), and rash (60.0%). Most AEs were grades 1-3. Overall, objective response rate (90% confidence interval [CI]) was 41.5% (31.2-52.5%). Median (range) duration of response was 11.09 (2.70-34.57) months. Median progression-free survival (90% CI) was 8.1 (5.4-23.3) months.

CONCLUSIONS

PF-06747775 had a manageable safety profile and the study design highlights important considerations for future anti-EGFR agent development.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of BPI-15086 in patients with EGFR T790M-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a phase I, single-arm, multicenter study

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance frequently occurs in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EGFR Thr790Met mutation (T790M+) is seen in ∼50% of patients. We assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BPI-15086, a novel, ATP-competitive, irreversible, third-generation, mutation-selective EGFR-TKI in patients with EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC.

Patients and methods

This two-center, phase I, dose-escalation study included patients who were 18-65 years old, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic T790M+ NSCLC who were not surgical or radiotherapy candidates, and had imaging-identified disease progression after prior EGFR-TKIs. This dose-escalation study enrolled patients using a 3 + 3 study design. Patients received 25, 50, 100, 200, and 300 mg/day orally in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, and PK. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The dose-expansion study was not conducted.

Results

We enrolled 17 patients from 29 December 2016 to 16 May 2018, in the safety and full analysis sets. All patients completed a single dosing trial, and no adverse events (AEs) causing drug discontinuation were seen. Grade 1-2 nausea, hypoalbuminemia, and decreased appetite were the most common treatment-related AEs. Grade 3 hyperglycemia was seen in one patient dosed at 300 mg/day. The ORR and DCR were 17.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8% to 43.4%] and 47.1% (95% CI 23.0% to 72.2%), respectively.

Conclusion

BPI-15086 is a safe and tolerable third-generation EGFR-TKI with a rationale for further clinical studies.

•

BPI-15086 is safe and has partial effectiveness in patients with advanced T790M+ NSCLC after previous EGFR-TKI therapy.

•

A different safety profile for BPI-15086 compared with other third-generation EGFR-TKIs.

•

The modest efficacy in this study is still deemed important and should be added to the literature of third-generation TKIs.

WX-0593 combined with an epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody in the treatment of xenograft tumors carrying triple EGFR mutations

Background

To evaluate the safety and therapeutic efficacy of WX-0593, a newly developed potent anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, in combination with an epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (QL1203 or Vectibix) for the treatment of xenograft tumors carrying mutant EGFR and osimertinib-resistant mutations (EGFR/T790M/C797S).

Methods

The inhibition of tumor cell proliferation by WX-0593 and Vectibix alone or combined was evaluated in four EGFR triple-mutant cell lines: PC9 (EGFR Del19/T790M/C797S), NCI-H1975 (EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S), Ba/F3 (EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S and EGFR Del19/T790M/C797S). The in vivo antitumor efficacy of WX-0593 alone or combined with QL1203 or Vectibix was evaluated in xenograft tumor models of BALB/c nude mice developed from H1975 (EGFR-Del19/T790M/C797S) and Ba/F3 (EGFR-L858R/T790M/C797S) cell lines. Mice were randomized into groups and treated with or without WX-0593, QL1203, Vectibix, or their combination. The tumor volume, mouse body weight, and therapeutic side effects were monitored routinely. Blood samples were obtained from all mice at different time points after the last dosage of treatment to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs.

Results

WX-0593 and Vectibix showed a strong synergistic inhibitory effect on the proliferation of two EGFR triple-mutant Ba/F3 cell lines (EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S and Del19/T790M/C797S), but little synergistic inhibitory effect on the proliferation of NCI-H1975 (EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S) and PC9 (EGFR Del19/T790M/C797S). In vivo, WX-0593 (25 mg/kg) showed a modest therapeutic effect when combined with QL1203 or Vectibix, but had no effect on tumor growth as a monotherapy at this dosage. WX-0593 (75 mg/kg) exhibited modest antitumor efficacy that was further enhanced in combination with QL1203 or Vectibix in both tumor models (H1975 and Ba/F3). No significant body weight alteration, any other side effect, or deaths were observed during treatment. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the serum level of QL1203 or Vectibix was significantly increased and lasted longer when combined with WX-0593.

Conclusions

WX-0593 exhibited a synergetic effect with an EGFR monoclonal antibody on osimertinib-resistant EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) both in vitro and in vivo. Their combination showed potent antitumor efficacy and an acceptable safety profile, which may be a promising strategy for the treatment of patients with EGFR triple-mutant NSCLC resistant to osimertinib.

Efficacy and safety of Limertinib (ASK120067) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2b study

BACKGROUND

Limertinib (ASK120067) is a newly developed third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting both sensitizing EGFR and EGFR T790M mutations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of limertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This is a single-arm, open-label, phase 2b study conducted at 62 hospitals across China. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with centrally confirmed EGFR T790M mutations in tumor tissue or blood plasma who progressed after first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs or with primary EGFR T790M mutations were enrolled. Patients received limertinib 160mg orally twice daily, until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Safety was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03.

RESULTS

From June 24, 2019 to Feb 25, 2021, a total of 301 patients were enrolled and received the treatment of limertinib. All patients entered the full analysis set (FAS) and safety set (SS). By the data cutoff date on Sept 9, 2021, 76 (25.2%) remained on treatment. The median follow-up time was 10.4 months (range 0.3-26.3). Based on FAS, the IRC-assessed ORR was 68.8% (95%CI 63.2%-74.0%) and DCR was 92.4% (95%CI 88.8%-95.1%). The median PFS was 11.0 months (95%CI 9.7-12.4), median DoR was 11.1 months (95%CI 9.6-13.8), and median OS was not reached (NR) (95%CI 19.7 months-NR). Objective responses were achieved across all pre-specified subgroups. For 99 (32.9%) patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the ORR was 64.6% (95%CI 54.4%-74.0%), median PFS was 9.7 months (95%CI 5.9-11.6), and median DoR was 9.6 months (95%CI 8.1-15.2). For 41 patients who had evaluable CNS lesion, the confirmed CNS-ORR was 56.1% (95%CI 39.7%-71.5%) and median CNS-PFS was 10.6 months (95%CI 5.6-NE). In SS, 289 (96.0%) patients experienced at least one treatment related adverse event (TRAE), with the most common being diarrhea (81.7%), anemia (32.6%), rash (29.9%) and appetite decrease (28.2%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 104 (34.6%) patients, with the most common including diarrhea (13.0%), hypokalemia (4.3%), anemia (4.0%) and rash (3.3%). TRAEs leading to dose interruption and dose discontinuation occurred in 24.6% and 2% of patients, respectively. No TRAE leading to death occurred.

CONCLUSION

Limertinib (ASK120067) demonstrated promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M mutated NSCLC.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

NCT03502850.

Case Report: Torsade de Pointes Induced by the Third-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Osimertinib Combined With Litsea Cubeba

Torsades de Pointes (TdP) occurred in a 68-year-old female with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung cancer administered osimertinib, the third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded at Tdp showed QT prolongation (QTc = 515 ms), to which a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) named “Litsea Cubeba” may have contributed. After discontinuation of osimertinib and Litsea Cubeba, magnesium supplementation, potassium supplementation, lidocaine infusion, and the pacemaker frequency adjustment, Tdp terminated. However, QT prolongation sustained at discharge (QTc = 528 ms), partly because of the emergency use of amiodarone. Osimertinib may prolong the QT interval leading to TdP, especially when multiple risk factors to lengthen QT interval are incidentally overlapped. Thus, regular monitoring of ECG and appropriate management of concomitant drugs are highly recommended.

AXL/CDCP1/SRC axis confers acquired resistance to osimertinib in lung cancer

Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, has nowadays been applied to non-small cell lung cancer harboring activated EGFR mutation with or without T790M, but ultimately develop resistance to this drug. Here we report a novel mechanism of acquired resistance to osimertinib and the reversal of which could improve the clinical outcomes. In osimertinib-resistant lung cancer cell lines harboring T790M mutation that we established, expression of multiple EGFR family proteins and MET was markedly reduced, whereas expression of AXL, CDCP1 and SRC was augmented along with activation of AKT. Surprisingly, AXL or CDCP1 expression was induced by osimertinib in a time-dependent manner up to 3 months. Silencing of CDCP1 or AXL restored the sensitivity to osimertinib with reduced activation of SRC and AKT. Furthermore, silencing of both CDCP1 and AXL increased the sensitivity to osimertinib. Either silencing of SRC or dasatinib, a SRC family kinase (SFK) inhibitor, suppressed AKT phosphorylation and cell growth. Increased expression of AXL and CDCP1 was observed in refractory tumor samples from patients with lung cancer treated with osimertinib. Together, this study suggests that AXL/SFK/AKT and CDCP1/SFK/AKT signaling pathways play some roles in acquired osimertinib resistance of non-small cell lung cancer.

Impact of clinical and molecular features on efficacy and outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving second-line osimertinib

Background

Although with the impressive efficacy, several patients showed intrinsic resistance or an unsatisfactory response to Osimertinib. We aim to explore the impact of clinical and molecular features on efficacy and outcome of patients with EGFR T790M-mutation non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving second-line Osimertinib.

Methods

Patients with EGFR T790M-mutant NSCLC who had acquired resistance to the first-generation EGFR TKI and then received Osimertinib as second-line treatment were included. Patients’ demographic and clinical information, as well as molecular data were extracted from electronic medical records. The impact of clinical and molecular features on treatment response and patients’ outcome were assessed.

Results

Among the 99 patients, 60 patients were tissue/pleural effusion T790M positive and 69 patients were plasma positive with a median PFS of 12.1 m and 9.9 m (P = 0.25), respectively. In addition, median PFS were similar between patients of plasma T790M + and patients of plasma T790M- (P = 0.94). The Pearson correlation test showed no significant relationship between plasma T790M abundance and PFS (r = 0.074, P = 0.546). In subgroup analyses, PFS was significantly improved in elder patients (P = 0.009) and patients with longer PFS to the first-generation EGFR TKI (P = 0.0008), while smokers tended to have worse PFS compared with non-smokers (P = 0.064). PARP1 mutant-type patients had a worse PFS compared with wild-type group (P = 0.0003). Patients with MYC amplification also had a worse PFS than MYC wild-type patients (P = 0.016). A significant PFS shrinkage was observed in TMB-High group as 6.77 m, compared with 19.10 m in TMB-Low group. The multivariate Cox analysis revealed that years ≥ 65 was an independent positive feature for PFS, while PARP1 mutation and TMB-H were negative features for PFS.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our findings in this study demonstrated that clinical and molecular features can be served as predictive biomarkers to stratify patients with EGFR T790M-mutant NSCLC receiving second-line Osimertinib.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09683-1.

AENEAS: A Randomized Phase III Trial of Aumolertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy for Locally Advanced or MetastaticNon-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 19 Deletion or L858R Mutations

Aumolertinib (formerly almonertinib; HS-10296) is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in China. This double-blind phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of aumolertinib compared with gefitinib as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03849768).

A randomized phase II study of docetaxel or pemetrexed with or without the continuation of gefitinib after disease progression in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations (JMTO LC12-01)

BACKGROUND

Gefitinib (G) is a recommended molecular-targeted agent for elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Docetaxel (Doc) and pemetrexed (Pem) have similar efficacies, and either is often used as the sole agent during treatment. The efficacy of continuing G after progressive disease (PD) develops has been reported. It remains unclear whether the continuation of G in combination with a single cytotoxic agent beyond PD is beneficial for elderly patients. Here, we conducted a randomized phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy with G for elderly patients with progressive EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

METHODS

Elderly patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with PD previously treated with G were enrolled. Patients received Pem 500 mg/m or Doc 60 mg/m every 21 days and were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy with 250 mg G (G+ Doc/Pem arm) or without G (Doc/Pem arm) until further disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

This trial was terminated early owing to slow accrual. A group of 22 patients underwent analysis. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was significantly longer in the G + Doc/Pem arm (median: 1.6 months vs. 5.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.16-0.99, p = 0.0391). Adverse events ≥ grade 3 were more frequent in the G + Doc/Pem arm (45.5% vs. 90.9%, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on G and Pem or Doc beyond PD showed a longer PFS than those on single-agent chemotherapy; however, it was associated with increased toxicity.

Cancer's second genome: Microbial cancer diagnostics and redefining clonal evolution as a multispecies process: Humans and their tumors are not aseptic, and the multispecies nature of cancer modulates clinical care and clonal evolution: Humans and their tumors are not aseptic, and the multispecies nature of cancer modulates clinical care and clonal evolution

The presence and role of microbes in human cancers has come full circle in the last century. Tumors are no longer considered aseptic, but implications for cancer biology and oncology remain underappreciated. Opportunities to identify and build translational diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics that exploit cancer's second genome-the metagenome-are manifold, but require careful consideration of microbial experimental idiosyncrasies that are distinct from host-centric methods. Furthermore, the discoveries of intracellular and intra-metastatic cancer bacteria necessitate fundamental changes in describing clonal evolution and selection, reflecting bidirectional interactions with non-human residents. Reconsidering cancer clonality as a multispecies process similarly holds key implications for understanding metastasis and prognosing therapeutic resistance while providing rational guidance for the next generation of bacterial cancer therapies. Guided by these new findings and challenges, this Review describes opportunities to exploit cancer's metagenome in oncology and proposes an evolutionary framework as a first step towards modeling multispecies cancer clonality. Also see the video abstract here: https://youtu.be/-WDtIRJYZSs.

Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Combination EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in EGFR-Mutant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

The use of combination epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in EGFR-mutant, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has raised concerns over the risk of overlapping toxicities. Although a higher proportion of interstitial lung diseases was reported with the combination of osimertinib and durvalumab, the current evidence on the treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) of EGFR-TKI and ICI remains limited to pneumonitis and the use of osimertinib. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates whether combination EGFR-TKI and ICI increases the incidence of overall and organ-specific trAEs compared to TKI monotherapy. A higher proportion of high-grade organ-specific trAEs was observed in combination TKI and ICI including skin, gastrointestinal adverse events, and interstitial lung diseases. Further prospective studies are warranted to determine the optimal drug of choice of ICI and the best timing of initiation of ICI after failure to prior EGFR-TKI.

Abstract

(1) Background: We performed a meta-analysis to examine whether combined epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) increases treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (2) Methods: Articles from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched. Proportions and odds ratios (ORs) of the pooled incidence of overall and organ-specific trAEs in combination EGFR-TKI and ICI were compared to TKI monotherapy. (3) Results: Eight studies fulfilled our selection criteria. Any-grade organ-specific trAEs were more common in combination EGFR-TKI and ICI than TKI monotherapy (skin: OR = 1.19, p = 0.012; gastrointestinal tract: OR = 1.04, p = 0.790; ILD: OR = 1.28, p = 0.001). Grade ≥ 3 trAEs were also more frequent in combination treatment (skin: OR = 1.13, p = 0.082; gastrointestinal tract: OR = 1.13, p = 0.076; ILD: OR = 1.16, p = 0.003). (4) Conclusions: A higher proportion of grade ≥3 skin and gastrointestinal trAEs and ILDs was observed in combination TKI and ICI compared to TKI alone. Caution has to be taken when interpreting the results owing to the small number of studies included in this meta-analysis.

Three Third-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Similarities and Differences

Osimertinib, almonertinib and furmonertinib are third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) approved for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR T790M mutation. This article reviews research advances in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, treatment-related adverse events, and other aspects related to the three EGFR-TKIs were systematically reviewed in order to provide references for clinical drug selection. There are differences in dosing schedule and incidence of adverse events among three drugs. Optimization of third-generation EGFR-TKIs options for individuals may produce the maximal benefits to NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation.

EGFR signaling pathway as therapeutic target in human cancers

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) enacts major roles in the maintenance of epithelial tissues. However, when EGFR signaling is altered, it becomes the grand orchestrator of epithelial transformation, and hence one of the most world-wide studied tyrosine kinase receptors involved in neoplasia, in several tissues. In the last decades, EGFR-targeted therapies shaped the new era of precision-oncology. Despite major advances, the dream of converting solid tumors into a chronic disease is still unfulfilled, and long-term remission eludes us. Studies investigating the function of this protein in solid malignancies have revealed numerous ways how tumor cells dysregulate EGFR function. Starting from preclinical models (cell lines, organoids, murine models) and validating in clinical specimens, EGFR-related oncogenic pathways, mechanisms of resistance, and novel avenues to inhibit tumor growth and metastatic spread enriching the therapeutic portfolios, were identified. Focusing on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where EGFR mutations are major players in the adenocarcinoma subtype, we will go over the most relevant discoveries that led us to understand EGFR and beyond, and highlight how they revolutionized cancer treatment by expanding the therapeutic arsenal at our disposal.

Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumour Cells and Circulating Tumour DNA in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-An Update

Despite efforts to improve earlier diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most patients present with advanced stage disease, which is often associated with poor survival outcomes with only 15% surviving for 5 years from their diagnosis. Tumour tissue biopsy is the current mainstream for cancer diagnosis and prognosis in many parts of the world. However, due to tumour heterogeneity and accessibility issues, liquid biopsy is emerging as a game changer for both cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Liquid biopsy is the analysis of tumour-derived biomarkers in body fluids, which has remarkable advantages over the use of traditional tumour biopsy. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) are two main derivatives of liquid biopsy. CTC enumeration and molecular analysis enable monitoring of cancer progression, recurrence, and treatment response earlier than traditional biopsy through a minimally invasive liquid biopsy approach. CTC-derived ex-vivo cultures are essential to understanding CTC biology and their role in metastasis, provide a means for personalized drug testing, and guide treatment selection. Just like CTCs, ctDNA provides opportunity for screening, monitoring, treatment evaluation, and disease surveillance. We present an updated review highlighting the prognostic and therapeutic significance of CTCs and ctDNA in NSCLC.

Novel targeted therapies for advanced non-small lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer accounting for almost 80%-85% of all lung cancer cases. Unfortunately, more than half of the patients will be diagnosed with advanced disease at the time of presentation, which makes their disease incurable. Historically, the 5 year overall survival for advanced NSCLC was 5%. However, there has been a significant increase in our understanding of the genetic basis of NSCLC, which has led to development of both immunotherapy and targeted therapy agents. This has improved the 5 year overall survival to become within the range of 15%-50% depending on certain mutations and biomarkers. Over the last decade the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved almost 20 new targeted therapies and clinical trials are still undergoing to evaluate more novel agents. In this review, we will present recent updates on novel targeted therapies.

Solid Tumors and Kinase Inhibition: Management and Therapy Efficacy Evolution

The increasing numbers of cancer cases worldwide and the exceedingly high mortality rates of some tumor subtypes raise the question about if the current protocols for cancer management are effective and what has been done to improve upon oncologic patients’ prognoses. The traditional chemo-immunotherapy options for cancer treatment focus on the use of cytotoxic agents that are able to overcome neoplastic clones’ survival mechanisms and induce apoptosis, as well as on the ability to capacitate the host’s immune system to hinder the continuous growth of malignant cells. The need to avert the highly toxic profiles of conventional chemo-immunotherapy and to overcome the emerging cases of tumor multidrug resistance has fueled a growing interest in the field of precision medicine and targeted molecular therapies in the last couple of decades, although relatively new alternatives in oncologic practices, the increased specificity, and the positive clinical outcomes achieved through targeted molecular therapies have already consolidated them as promising prospects for the future of cancer management. In recent years, the development and application of targeted drugs as tyrosine kinase inhibitors have enabled cancer treatment to enter the era of specificity. In addition, the combined use of targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and traditional chemotherapy has innovated the standard treatment for many malignancies, bringing new light to patients with recurrent tumors. This article comprises a series of clinical trials that, in the past 5 years, utilized kinase inhibitors (KIs) as a monotherapy or in combination with other cytotoxic agents to treat patients afflicted with solid tumors. The results, with varying degrees of efficacy, are reported.

Knowledge graph-based recommendation framework identifies drivers of resistance in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer

Resistance to EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi) presents a major obstacle in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One of the most exciting new ways to find potential resistance markers involves running functional genetic screens, such as CRISPR, followed by manual triage of significantly enriched genes. This triage process to identify ‘high value’ hits resulting from the CRISPR screen involves manual curation that requires specialized knowledge and can take even experts several months to comprehensively complete. To find key drivers of resistance faster we build a recommendation system on top of a heterogeneous biomedical knowledge graph integrating pre-clinical, clinical, and literature evidence. The recommender system ranks genes based on trade-offs between diverse types of evidence linking them to potential mechanisms of EGFRi resistance. This unbiased approach identifies 57 resistance markers from >3,000 genes, reducing hit identification time from months to minutes. In addition to reproducing known resistance markers, our method identifies previously unexplored resistance mechanisms that we prospectively validate.

Resistance to EGFR inhibitors presents a major obstacle in treating non-small cell lung cancer. Here, the authors develop a recommender system ranking genes based on trade-offs between diverse types of evidence linking them to potential mechanisms of EGFRi resistance.

First-Line Osimertinib in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Outcome and Safety in the Real World: FLOWER Study

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib became the standard treatment for patients with untreated EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) following results reported in the phase III randomized FLAURA trial. Because of strict exclusion criteria, patient populations included in pivotal trials are only partially representative of real-world patients.

METHODS

We designed an observational, prospective, multicenter study enrolling patients with EGFR-mutant aNSCLC receiving first-line osimertinib to evaluate effectiveness, safety, and progression patterns in the real-world.

RESULTS

At data cutoff, 126 White patients from nine oncology centers were included. At diagnosis, 16 patients (12.7%) had a performance status (PS) ≥2 and 38 (30.2%) had brain metastases. Overall response rate (ORR) was 73%, disease control rate (DCR) 96.0%. After a median follow-up of 12.3 months, median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD) was 25.3 months, median progression-free-survival (mPFS) was 18.9 months and median overall survival (mOS) was not reached (NR). One hundred and ten patients (87%) experienced adverse events (AEs), 42 (33%) of grade 3-4, with venous thromboembolism (VTE) as the most common (n = 10, 7.9%). No difference in rates of VTE was reported according to age, PS, comorbidity, and tumor load. We observed longer mTTD in patients without symptoms (NR vs. 18.8 months) and with fewer than three metastatic sites at diagnosis (NR vs. 21.4 months). Patients without brain metastases experienced longer mPFS (NR vs. 13.3 months). No difference in survival outcome was observed according to age, comorbidity, and type of EGFR mutation. Isolated progression and progression in fewer than three sites were associated with longer time to treatment discontinuation (TTD).

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib confirmed effectiveness and safety in the real world, although thromboembolism was more frequent than previously reported.

Epidermal growth factor receptor-Mutated Non-small-cell Lung Cancer with Intracranial Progressions and Stable Extracranial Diseases Benefit from Osimertinib Regardless of T790M Mutational Status

Objectives

Osimertinib has exhibited promising central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In real-world clinical practice, patients would turn to plasma genotyping or take osimertinib blindly after CNS progression on previous tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the efficacy of osimertinib in those patients according to their T790M mutational status has not been explored.

Materials and methods

Twenty-five patients who received osimertinib due to intracranial progressions with stable extracranial diseases after early-generation EGFR-TKI treatment were collected from 1032 EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Plasma samples were analyzed for EGFR mutations using next-generation sequencing (NGS) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Results

Among the 25 patients, 17 patients took plasma genotyping before osimertinib treatment with 8 patients EGFR T790M mutation-positive and the rest started osimertinib blindly. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.12-9.94) and median intracranial PFS (iPFS) was 14.4 months (95% CI: 7.27-21.59) for the total population. No statistical difference was found in PFS and iPFS among patients with different EGFR T790M mutational statuses. Intracranial disease control rate (DCR) was 100.0% for 14 patients with evaluable intracranial lesions despite different T790M mutational statuses. DCR for extracranial lesions and overall lesions were 100.0%, 66.7%, and 87.5% for patients with T790M, no T790M, and unknown T790M mutational status, respectively.

Conclusion

For EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with only intracranial progressions after previous TKI treatments, osimertinib is a promising treatment option regardless of T790M mutational status from plasma genotyping.

Integration of liquid biopsy and pharmacogenomics for precision therapy of EGFR mutant and resistant lung cancers

The advent of molecular profiling has revolutionized the treatment of lung cancer by comprehensively delineating the genomic landscape of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. Drug resistance caused by EGFR mutations and genetic polymorphisms of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters impedes effective treatment of EGFR mutant and resistant lung cancer. This review appraises current literature, opportunities, and challenges associated with liquid biopsy and pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing as precision therapy tools in the management of EGFR mutant and resistant lung cancers. Liquid biopsy could play a potential role in selection of precise tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies during different phases of lung cancer treatment. This selection will be based on the driver EGFR mutational status, as well as monitoring the development of potential EGFR mutations arising during or after TKIs treatment, since some of these new mutations may be druggable targets for alternative TKIs. Several studies have identified the utility of liquid biopsy in the identification of EGFR driver and acquired resistance with good sensitivities for various blood-based biomarkers. With a plethora of sequencing technologies and platforms available currently, further evaluations using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in multicentric, multiethnic and larger patient cohorts could enable optimization of liquid-based assays for the detection of EGFR mutations, and support testing of CYP450 enzymes and drug transporter polymorphisms to guide precise dosing of EGFR TKIs.

Osimertinib induced cardiac failure and QT-prolongation in a patient with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Osimertinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) used for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presenting an EGFR mutation. Although Osimertinib has a better safety profile compared to older EGFR-TKIs and although adverse events (AEs) are described in literature, recently the relationship between Osimertinib therapy and cardiotoxicity is gaining attention.

CASE REPORT

A 79-years old woman, with a history of lung adenocarcinoma on treatment with Osimertinib since 2019, was recovered in our department because of acute respiratory failure and acute heart failure with QT prolongation. The patient's history included hypertension, type 2 diabetes, breast carcinoma, Tuberculosis.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

The patient discontinued Osimertinib therapy and we treated her with diuretics, ß-blocker, and oxygen. After an initial improvement, the heart failure worsened further, and the therapy had to be increased. We ruled out other respiratory causes of heart failure and cardiological causes of QT prolongation. After stable clinical improvement, the patient underwent coronary artery disease which was negative. Therefore, the most likely cause of acute heart disease was Osimertinib therapy.

DISCUSSION

This is a rare case of concomitant QT prolongation and congestive heart failure induced by Osimertinib therapy. The cause of cardiotoxicity probably depends on factors related to the action of the drug and patient specific factors. The cardiotoxic risk in these patients seems underestimated and cardiotoxicity induced by new anticancer treatments is increasing in importance. Cardiac monitoring is recommended in neoplastic patients receiving Osimertinib therapy with cardiological risk factors.

Life-Threatening Myositis in a Patient With EGFR-Mutated NSCLC on Osimertinib: Case Report

Osimertinib is the standard of care for the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC. We report a case of a 52-year-old woman who developed life-threatening myopathy because of treatment with osimertinib. Limited instances of myositis have been previously reported in the literature; however, none have resulted in life-threatening oropharyngeal and respiratory muscle weakness as seen in this case. Care should be taken in administering osimertinib concurrently with other medications metabolized by the CYP3A4 system, and ongoing work to identify patients at risk for severe reactions is necessary. The use of routine creatinine phosphokinase monitoring should be considered as part of oncologic management.

EGFR-dependent mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib determined by ctDNA NGS analysis identify patients with better outcome

Background

Osimertinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is highly selective for EGFR^T790M subclones in patients with EGFR^sensitizing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, all patients develop resistance through EGFR-dependent or EGFR-independent pathways. Recently, circulating tumoral DNA (ctDNA) analysis has highlighted the usefulness of plasma genotyping for exploring patient survival outcomes after disease progression under osimertinib.

Methods

Plasma samples from patients treated with osimertinib as a second-line therapy were collected and the presence of molecular alterations of acquired resistance was evaluated after relapse under osimertinib using ctDNA molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays. The clinical implications of these genomic alterations for the efficiency of the third-generation TKI were further assessed.

Results

Our ctDNA molecular profiling of plasma samples highlighted large number of actionable genomic alterations. According to ctDNA NGS results, patients were classified as having developed an EGFR-dependent or EGFR-independent mechanism of resistance. Thus, patients who developed an EGFR-dependent mechanism of resistance responded longer to osimertinib (13.8 vs. 4.6 months; P<10⁻⁴) and have a better post-osimertinib clinical outcome than EGFR-independent resistant patients. Moreover, the development of an EGFR-dependent mechanism of osimertinib resistance was identified as the best fit to determine patients’ clinical outcome compared with EGFR^T790M status alone (P=0.003).

Conclusions

Our study highlights the potential of ctDNA NGS to rapidly select the appropriate drug after osimertinib failure and to determine clinical outcomes of patients. We suggest that ctDNA NGS should be more intensively used in clinical practice to follow patients under third-generation TKIs.

Modelling approaches for histology-independent cancer drugs to inform NICE appraisals: a systematic review and decision-framework

BACKGROUND

The first histology-independent marketing authorisation in Europe was granted in 2019. This was the first time that a cancer treatment was approved based on a common biomarker rather than the location in the body at which the tumour originated. This research aims to explore the implications for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisals.

METHODS

Targeted reviews were undertaken to determine the type of evidence that is likely to be available at the point of marketing authorisation and the analyses required to support National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisals. Several challenges were identified concerning the design and conduct of trials for histology-independent products, the greater levels of heterogeneity within the licensed population and the use of surrogate end points. We identified approaches to address these challenges by reviewing key statistical literature that focuses on the design and analysis of histology-independent trials and by undertaking a systematic review to evaluate the use of response end points as surrogate outcomes for survival end points. We developed a decision framework to help to inform approval and research policies for histology-independent products. The framework explored the uncertainties and risks associated with different approval policies, including the role of further data collection, pricing schemes and stratified decision-making.

RESULTS

We found that the potential for heterogeneity in treatment effects, across tumour types or other characteristics, is likely to be a central issue for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisals. Bayesian hierarchical methods may serve as a useful vehicle to assess the level of heterogeneity across tumours and to estimate the pooled treatment effects for each tumour, which can inform whether or not the assumption of homogeneity is reasonable. Our review suggests that response end points may not be reliable surrogates for survival end points. However, a surrogate-based modelling approach, which captures all relevant uncertainty, may be preferable to the use of immature survival data. Several additional sources of heterogeneity were identified as presenting potential challenges to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisal, including the cost of testing, baseline risk, quality of life and routine management costs. We concluded that a range of alternative approaches will be required to address different sources of heterogeneity to support National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisals. An exemplar case study was developed to illustrate the nature of the assessments that may be required.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequately designed and analysed basket studies that assess the homogeneity of outcomes and allow borrowing of information across baskets, where appropriate, are recommended. Where there is evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effects and estimates of cost-effectiveness, consideration should be given to optimised recommendations. Routine presentation of the scale of the consequences of heterogeneity and decision uncertainty may provide an important additional approach to the assessments specified in the current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence methods guide.

FURTHER RESEARCH

Further exploration of Bayesian hierarchical methods could help to inform decision-makers on whether or not there is sufficient evidence of homogeneity to support pooled analyses. Further research is also required to determine the appropriate basis for apportioning genomic testing costs where there are multiple targets and to address the challenges of uncontrolled Phase II studies, including the role and use of surrogate end points.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 76. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.