Genetic determinants of pulmonary fibrosis: evolving concepts

Update on therapeutic management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive diffuse parenchymal lung disease of unknown origin, with a mortality rate exceeding that of many cancers. The diagnostic process is complex and relies on the clinician integrating clinical, laboratory, radiological, and histological data. In the last decade, major advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of IPF have shifted the paradigm from a primarily inflammatory process evolving to fibrosis to a condition driven by aberrant wound healing following alveolar epithelial cell injury that results in scarring of the lung, architectural distortion, and irreversible loss of function. Improved understanding of disease pathogenesis has led to the identification of several therapeutic targets and the design of high-quality clinical trials evaluating novel compounds. However, the results of these studies have been mostly disappointing, probably due to the plethora of mediators, growth factors, and signaling pathways involved in the fibrotic process. Most recently, pirfenidone and nintedanib, two compounds with pleiotropic anti-fibrotic properties, have been proven effective in reducing functional decline and disease progression in IPF. This is a major breakthrough. Nevertheless, we still have a long way to go. In fact, neither pirfenidone nor nintedanib is a cure for IPF, and most patients continue to progress despite treatment. As such, comprehensive care of patients with IPF, including management of concomitant conditions and physical debility, as well as timely referral for lung transplantation, remains essential. Several agents with a high potential are currently being tested, and many more are ready for clinical trials. Their completion is critical for achieving the ultimate goal of curing patients with IPF.

Mechanisms of alveolar epithelial injury, repair, and fibrosis

The challenge facing many fibrotic lung diseases is that these conditions usually present late, often after several decades of repetitive alveolar epithelial injury, during which functional alveolar units are gradually obliterated and replaced with nonfunctional connective tissue. The resulting fibrosis is often progressive and, in the case of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), invariably leads to respiratory insufficiency and, ultimately, the premature death of affected individuals. Recent years have seen a greater appreciation of the relative importance of chronic inflammation as a driver of fibrotic responses. Current evidence suggests that IPF arises as a result of repetitive epithelial injury and a highly aberrant wound healing response in genetically susceptible and aged individuals. Nonspecific anti-inflammatory agents offer no clinical benefit, but the potential contribution of maladaptive immune responses in determining outcome is gaining increasing recognition. The importance of key differences in the tissue-regenerative potential in young versus aged individuals is also beginning to be more fully appreciated. Moreover, there is considerable overlap in the mechanisms underlying tissue repair and cancer, and patients with IPF are at heightened risk of developing lung cancer. Progressive fibrosis and cancer may therefore represent the extremes of a highly dysregulated tissue injury response. This brief review focuses on some of this evidence and on our current understanding of abnormal tissue repair responses after chronic epithelial injury in the specific context of IPF.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an update

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common and lethal form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. The disease, which occurs primarily in middle-aged and older adults, is thought to arise following an aberrant reparative response to alveolar epithelial cell injury characterized by secretion of excessive amounts of extracellular matrix components, resulting in scarring of the lung, architectural distortion, and irreversible loss of function. A complex interplay between environmental and host factors is thought to contribute to the development of the disease, although the cause of IPF remains elusive and its pathogenesis incompletely understood. Over the last decade, disease definition and diagnostic criteria have evolved significantly, and this has facilitated the design of a number of high-quality clinical trials evaluating novel therapeutic agents for IPF. This massive effort of the medical and industry community has led to the identification of two compounds (pirfenidone and nintedanib) able to reduce functional decline and disease progression. These promising results notwithstanding, IPF remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality and a largely unmet medical need. A real cure for this devastating disease has yet to emerge and will likely consist of a combination of drugs targeting the plethora of pathways potentially involved in disease pathogenesis.