51
|
Dandekar BR, Mondal J. Capturing Protein-Ligand Recognition Pathways in Coarse-Grained Simulation. J Phys Chem Lett 2020; 11:5302-5311. [PMID: 32520567 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Protein-ligand recognition is dynamic and complex. A key approach in deciphering the mechanism underlying the recognition process is to capture the kinetic process of the ligand in its act of binding to its designated protein cavity. Toward this end, ultralong all-atom molecular dynamics simulation has recently emerged as a popular method of choice because of its ability to record these events at high spatial and temporal resolution. However, success via this route comes at an exorbitant computational cost. Herein, we demonstrate that coarse-grained models of the protein, when systematically optimized to maintain its tertiary fold, can capture the complete process of spontaneous protein-ligand binding from bulk media to the cavity at crystallographic precision and within wall clock time that is orders of magnitude shorter than that of all-atom simulations. The exhaustive sampling of ligand exploration in protein and solvent, harnessed by coarse-grained simulation, leads to elucidation of new ligand recognition pathways and discovery of non-native binding poses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhupendra R Dandekar
- Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Center for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Hyderabad 500046, India
| | - Jagannath Mondal
- Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Center for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Hyderabad 500046, India
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Prakashchand DD, Ahalawat N, Bandyopadhyay S, Sengupta S, Mondal J. Nonaffine Displacements Encode Collective Conformational Fluctuations in Proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 2020; 16:2508-2516. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dube Dheeraj Prakashchand
- Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Center for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Hyderabad 500107, India
| | - Navjeet Ahalawat
- Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Center for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Hyderabad 500107, India
- Department of Molecular Biology, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125004, India
| | - Satyabrata Bandyopadhyay
- Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Center for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Hyderabad 500107, India
| | - Surajit Sengupta
- Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Center for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Hyderabad 500107, India
| | - Jagannath Mondal
- Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Center for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Hyderabad 500107, India
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
de Ruiter A, Oostenbrink C. Advances in the calculation of binding free energies. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2020; 61:207-212. [PMID: 32088376 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, calculations of binding affinities from molecular simulations seem to have matured significantly. While the number of applications of such methods in drug design and biotechnology increases, the number of truly new methodological developments decreases. This review provides an overview of the current status of the field as reflected in recent publications. The focus is on the challenges that remain when using endstate, alchemical and pathway methods. For endstate methods this is the calculation of entropic contributions. For alchemical methods there are unsolved problems associated with the solvation of the active site, sampling slow degrees of freedom and when modifying the net charge. For pathway methods achieving sufficient sampling remains challenging. New trends are also highlighted, including the use of pathway methods for the quantification of protein-protein interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita de Ruiter
- Institute for Molecular Modeling and Simulation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria
| | - Chris Oostenbrink
- Institute for Molecular Modeling and Simulation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Rizzi A, Jensen T, Slochower DR, Aldeghi M, Gapsys V, Ntekoumes D, Bosisio S, Papadourakis M, Henriksen NM, de Groot BL, Cournia Z, Dickson A, Michel J, Gilson MK, Shirts MR, Mobley DL, Chodera JD. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2020; 34:601-633. [PMID: 31984465 DOI: 10.1007/s10822-020-00290-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Approaches for computing small molecule binding free energies based on molecular simulations are now regularly being employed by academic and industry practitioners to study receptor-ligand systems and prioritize the synthesis of small molecules for ligand design. Given the variety of methods and implementations available, it is natural to ask how the convergence rates and final predictions of these methods compare. In this study, we describe the concept and results for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge, the first challenge from the SAMPL series focusing on the assessment of convergence properties and reproducibility of binding free energy methodologies. We provided parameter files, partial charges, and multiple initial geometries for two octa-acid (OA) and one cucurbit[8]uril (CB8) host-guest systems. Participants submitted binding free energy predictions as a function of the number of force and energy evaluations for seven different alchemical and physical-pathway (i.e., potential of mean force and weighted ensemble of trajectories) methodologies implemented with the GROMACS, AMBER, NAMD, or OpenMM simulation engines. To rank the methods, we developed an efficiency statistic based on bias and variance of the free energy estimates. For the two small OA binders, the free energy estimates computed with alchemical and potential of mean force approaches show relatively similar variance and bias as a function of the number of energy/force evaluations, with the attach-pull-release (APR), GROMACS expanded ensemble, and NAMD double decoupling submissions obtaining the greatest efficiency. The differences between the methods increase when analyzing the CB8-quinine system, where both the guest size and correlation times for system dynamics are greater. For this system, nonequilibrium switching (GROMACS/NS-DS/SB) obtained the overall highest efficiency. Surprisingly, the results suggest that specifying force field parameters and partial charges is insufficient to generally ensure reproducibility, and we observe differences between seemingly converged predictions ranging approximately from 0.3 to 1.0 kcal/mol, even with almost identical simulations parameters and system setup (e.g., Lennard-Jones cutoff, ionic composition). Further work will be required to completely identify the exact source of these discrepancies. Among the conclusions emerging from the data, we found that Hamiltonian replica exchange-while displaying very small variance-can be affected by a slowly-decaying bias that depends on the initial population of the replicas, that bidirectional estimators are significantly more efficient than unidirectional estimators for nonequilibrium free energy calculations for systems considered, and that the Berendsen barostat introduces non-negligible artifacts in expanded ensemble simulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Rizzi
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
- Tri-Institutional Training Program in Computational Biology and Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Travis Jensen
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
| | - David R Slochower
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Matteo Aldeghi
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Computational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Vytautas Gapsys
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Computational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Dimitris Ntekoumes
- Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, 4 Soranou Ephessiou, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - Stefano Bosisio
- EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, David Brewster Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FJ, UK
| | - Michail Papadourakis
- EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, David Brewster Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FJ, UK
| | - Niel M Henriksen
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
- Atomwise, 717 Market St Suite 800, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA
| | - Bert L de Groot
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Computational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Zoe Cournia
- Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, 4 Soranou Ephessiou, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - Alex Dickson
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- Department of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Julien Michel
- EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, David Brewster Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FJ, UK
| | - Michael K Gilson
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Michael R Shirts
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
| | - David L Mobley
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California, 92697, USA.
| | - John D Chodera
- Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Bello M, Rodríguez-Fonseca RA, Correa-Basurto J. Complexation of peptide epitopes with G4-PAMAM dendrimer through ligand diffusion molecular dynamic simulations. J Mol Graph Model 2019; 96:107514. [PMID: 31877401 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2019.107514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Peptide epitopes from HIV-1 gp120 have been used to block the gp120-CD4 complex, whereas their poor absorbable or immunogenic properties prevent them from coupling to generation four polyamidoamine (PAMAM-G4) dendrimers. PAMAM-G4 are synthetic nanoparticles that are relatively nontoxic and nonimmunogenic have been employed as nanocarriers. In a previous study, two peptide epitopes (ABC and PGV04) from gp120 located at the protein-protein interface of the gp120-CD4 complex were identified through protein-protein dissociation. Then, their complexation with G4-PAMAM was evaluated through experimental and theoretical approaches, revealing a stoichiometry of 1:8/9 for G4-PAMAM and ABC or PGV04, respectively, providing important information that can be used to gain insight into the structural and energetic basis of the molecular binding of these G4-PAMAM-peptide systems. In this contribution, we performed ligand diffusion molecular dynamic simulations (LDMDSs) using 1.5 μs combined with the molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MMGBSA) approach, a strategy that successfully reproduced experimentally encapsulation on PAMAM-G4-ligand complexes, to explore the mechanism through which ABC and PGV04 are encapsulated by PAMAM-G4 under neutral and acid conditions. Our results reproduce the reported PAMAM-G4-peptide complex stoichiometry, revealing a slower peptide delivery at neutral conditions and a spontaneous release under acidic conditions. LDMDSs show that several peptides can reach stable G4-PAMAM complexes at neutral pH, and only a few are able to encapsulate on dendrimers without impacting dendrimer sphericity. Energetic analysis exploring different generalized Born models revealed that the ABC peptide has better binding properties than PGV04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martiniano Bello
- Laboratorio de Modelado Molecular, Diseño de fármacos y Bioinformática, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón, Ciudad de México, 11340, Mexico.
| | - Rolando Alberto Rodríguez-Fonseca
- Laboratorio de Modelado Molecular, Diseño de fármacos y Bioinformática, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón, Ciudad de México, 11340, Mexico
| | - José Correa-Basurto
- Laboratorio de Modelado Molecular, Diseño de fármacos y Bioinformática, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón, Ciudad de México, 11340, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Niitsu A, Re S, Oshima H, Kamiya M, Sugita Y. De Novo Prediction of Binders and Nonbinders for T4 Lysozyme by gREST Simulations. J Chem Inf Model 2019; 59:3879-3888. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ai Niitsu
- Theoretical Molecular Science Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research, Hirosawa 2-1, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
| | - Suyong Re
- Laboratory for Biomolecular Function Simulation, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, 6-7-1 Minatojima-minamimachi,
Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
| | - Hiraku Oshima
- Laboratory for Biomolecular Function Simulation, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, 6-7-1 Minatojima-minamimachi,
Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
| | - Motoshi Kamiya
- Computational Biophysics Research Team, RIKEN Center for Computational Science, 6-7-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
| | - Yuji Sugita
- Theoretical Molecular Science Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research, Hirosawa 2-1, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
- Laboratory for Biomolecular Function Simulation, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, 6-7-1 Minatojima-minamimachi,
Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
- Computational Biophysics Research Team, RIKEN Center for Computational Science, 6-7-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
| |
Collapse
|