Modulation of P-glycoprotein phosphorylation and drug transport by sodium butyrate

Phosphorylation by protein kinase C and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase of synthetic peptides derived from the linker region of human P-glycoprotein

Specific sites in the linker region of human P-glycoprotein phosphorylated by protein kinase C (PKC) were identified by means of a synthetic peptide substrate, PG-2, corresponding to residues 656-689 from this region of the molecule. As PG-2 has several sequences of the type recognized by the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), PG-2 was also tested as a substrate for PKA. PG-2 was phosphorylated by purified PKC in a Ca2+/phospholipid-dependent manner, with a Km of 1.3 microM, and to a maximum stoichiometry of 2.9 +/- 0.1 mol of phosphate/mol of peptide. Sequence analysis of tryptic fragments of PG-2 phosphorylated by PKC identified Ser-661, Ser-667 and Ser-671 as the three sites of phosphorylation. PG-2 was also found to be phosphorylated by purified PKA in a cyclic AMP-dependent manner, with a Km of 21 microM, and to a maximum stoichiometry of 2.6 +/- 0.2 mol of phosphate/mol of peptide. Ser-667, Ser-671 and Ser-683 were phosphorylated by PKA. Truncated peptides of PG-2 were utilized to confirm that Ser-661 was PKC-specific and Ser-683 was PKA-specific. Further studies showed that PG-2 acted as a competitive substrate for the P-glycoprotein kinase present in membranes from multidrug-resistant human KB cells. The membrane kinase phosphorylated PG-2 mainly on Ser-661, Ser-667 and Ser-671. These results show that human P-glycoprotein can be phosphorylated by at least two protein kinases, stimulated by different second-messenger systems, which exhibit both overlapping and unique specificities for phosphorylation of multiple sites in the linker region of the molecule.

Multidrug resistance in the laboratory and clinic

Multidrug resistance represents a major obstacle in the successful therapy of neoplastic diseases. Studies have demonstrated that this form of drug resistance occurs in cultured tumor cell lines as well as in human cancers. P-glycoprotein appears to play an important role in such cells by acting as an energy-dependent efflux pump to remove various natural-product drugs from the cell before they have a chance to exert their cytotoxic effects. Using the tools of molecular biology, studies are beginning to reveal the true incidence of multidrug resistance, as mediated by the MDR1 gene, in the clinical setting. It has been demonstrated, at least in the laboratory, that resistance mediated by P-glycoprotein may be modulated by a wide variety of compounds, including verapamil and cyclosporine A. These are compounds which, by themselves, generally have little or no effect on the tumor cells, but when used in conjunction with antineoplastic agents act to decrease, and in some instances eliminate, drug resistance. The mechanism(s) by which these agents act to reverse resistance is not fully understood. Clinical trials to modulate P-glycoprotein activity are now under way to determine whether such strategies will be feasible. The detection of the P-glycoprotein in patient samples is very important in the design of these studies, as it appears that drug-resistant cells lacking P-glycoprotein will be unaffected by agents such as verapamil. Clinical studies are needed in which patients are stratified into chemotherapy protocols based on levels of MDR1 mRNA or P-glycoprotein expression in the primary tumors. Several research areas have been identified that are important to the transfer of the discovery of the MDR1 gene and its protein product from the research laboratory to the clinical environment. There is an immediate need for comprehensive information on the prevalence and levels of expression of the human MDR genes and their protein products in human organs and tissues. Data are needed on P-glycoprotein levels in specific subpopulations (e.g., according to age, sex, race, and diet), and the study of the heterogeneity and variability of expression of P-glycoprotein in normal human tissues should be given high priority. Since early studies have indicated some successes in identifying patients with classic multidrug resistance who might be responsive to chemosensitization, it can be anticipated that clinical research will accelerate in this area. The next wave of clinical studies will provide clinical investigators with opportunities to develop and evaluate P-glycoprotein tests and correlate test results with clinical outcomes.

Genistein modulates the decreased drug accumulation in non-P-glycoprotein mediated multidrug resistant tumour cells

In tumour cells the pharmacological basis for multidrug resistance (MDR) often appears to be a reduced cellular cytostatic drug accumulation caused by the drug efflux protein, P-glycoprotein (Pgp MDR), or by other drug transporters (non-Pgp MDR). Here we report the reversal of the decreased daunorubicin (DNR) accumulation in five non-Pgp MDR cell lines (GLC4/ADR, SW-1573/2R120, HT1080/DR4, MCF7/Mitox and HL60/ADR) by genistein. Genistein inhibited the enhanced DNR efflux in the GLC4/ADR cells. In these cells the decreased VP-16 accumulation was also reversed by genistein. Three other (iso)flavonoids biochanin A, apigenin and quercetin also increased the DNR accumulation in the GLC4/ADR cells. In contrast to the effects on non-Pgp MDR cells, 200 microM genistein did not increase the reduced DNR accumulation in three Pgp MDR cell lines (SW-1573/2R160, MCF7/DOX40 and KB8-5) or in the parental cell lines. In conclusion the use of genistein provides a means to probe non-Pgp related drug accumulation defects.

Differing patterns of cross-resistance resulting from exposures to specific antitumour drugs or to radiation in vitro

This article reviews the patterns of cross-resistance identified in various P-glycoprotein-mediated and non-P-glycoprotein-mediated drug resistant mammalian tumour cell lines. The differing patterns of cross-resistance and the variable levels of resistance expressed are summarised and discussed. Although the mechanism by which P-glycoprotein can recognise and transport a large group of structurally-unrelated substrates remains to be defined, the recent evidence indicating that membrane associated domains participate in substrate recognition and binding is summarised, and other possible explanations for these variable cross-resistance patterns are considered. Amongst the non-P-glycoprotein-overexpressing multidrug resistant cell lines, two subsets are clearly identifiable, one lacking and the other expressing cross-resistance to the Vinca alkaloids. Resistance mechanisms implicated in these various sublines and possible explanations for their differing levels and patterns of cross-resistance are summarised. Clinical resistance is identified in patients following treatment not only with antitumour drugs, but also after radiotherapy. Experimental data providing a biological basis for this observation are summarised. A distinctive multiple drug resistance phenotype has been identified in tumour cells following exposure in vitro to fractionated X-irradiation characterised by: the expression of resistance to the Vinca alkaloids and the epipodophyllotoxins but not the anthracyclines and overexpression of P-glycoprotein which is post-translationally regulated, but without any concomitant overexpression of P-glycoprotein mRNA. Finally, the possible clinical relevance of these variable patterns of cross-resistance to the antitumour drugs commonly used in the clinic is considered.

Human cell lines as models for multidrug resistance in solid tumours

In spite of our expanding knowledge on the molecular biology of cancer, relatively little progress has been made in improving therapy for the solid tumours which are major killers, e.g., lung, colon, breast. Significant advances over the past 10-15 years in chemotherapy of some tumours such as testicular cancer and some leukaemias indicates that, in spite of the undesirable side-effects, chemotherapy has the potential to effect cure in the majority of patients with certain types of cancer. Multidrug resistance, inherent or acquired, is one important limiting factor in extending this success to most solid tumours. In vitro studies described in this review are now uncovering a diversity of possible mechanisms of cross-resistance to different types of drug. Sensitive methods such as immunocytochemistry, RT-PCR or in situ RNA hybridisation may be necessary to identify corresponding changes in clinical material. Only by classifying individual tumours according to their specific resistance mechanisms will it be possible to define the multidrug resistance problem properly. Such rigorous definition is a prerequisite to design (and choice on an individual basis) of specific therapies suited to individual patients. Since a much larger proportion of cancer biopsies should be susceptible to accurate analysis by the immunochemical and molecular biological techniques described above than to direct assessment of drug response, it seems reasonable to hope that this approach will succeed in improving results for cancer chemotherapy of solid tumours where other approaches such as individualised in vitro chemosensitivity testing have essentially failed. Results from clinical trials using cyclosporin A or verapamil are encouraging, but these agents are far from ideal, and reverse resistance in only a subset of resistant tumours. Proper definition of the other mechanisms of MDR, and how to antagonize them, is an urgent research priority.

Pharmacologic circumvention of multidrug resistance

The ability of malignant cells to develop resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs is a major obstacle to the successful treatment of clinical tumors. The phenomenon multidrug resistance (MDR) in cancer cells results in cross-resistance to a broad range of structurally diverse antineoplastic agents, due to outward efflux of cytotoxic substrates by the mdr1 gene product, P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Numerous pharmacologic agents have been identified which inhibit the efflux pump and modulate MDR. The biochemical, cellular and clinical pharmacology of agents used to circumvent MDR is analyzed in terms of their mechanism of action and potential clinical utility. MDR antagonists, termed chemosensitizers, may be grouped into several classes, and include calcium channel blockers, calmodulin antagonists, anthracycline and Vinca alkaloid analogs, cyclosporines, dipyridamole, and other hydrophobic, cationic compounds. Structural features important for chemosensitizer activity have been identified, and a model for the interaction of these drugs with P-gp is proposed. Other possible cellular targets for the reversal of MDR are also discussed, such as protein kinase C. Strategies for the clinical modulation of MDR and trials combining chemosensitizers with chemotherapeutic drugs in humans are reviewed. Several novel approaches for the modulation of MDR are examined.

Molecular analysis of the multidrug transporter

The multidrug resistance gene product, P-glycoprotein or the multidrug transporter, confers multidrug resistance to cancer cells by maintaining intracellular levels of cytotoxic agents below a killing threshold. P-glycoprotein is located within the plasma membrane and is thought to act as an energy-dependent drug efflux pump. The multidrug transporter represents a member of the ATP-binding cassette superfamily of transporters (or traffic ATPases) and is composed of two highly homologous halves, each of which harbors a hydrophobic transmembrane domain and a hydrophilic ATP-binding fold. This review focuses on various biochemical and molecular genetic approaches used to analyze the structure, function, and mechanism of action of the multidrug transporter, whose most intriguing feature is its ability to interact with a large number of structurally and functionally different amphiphilic compounds. These studies have underscored the complexity of this membrane protein which has recently been suggested to assume alternative topological and quaternary structures, and to serve multiple functions both as a transporter and as a channel. With respect to the multidrug transporter activity of P-glycoprotein, progress has been made towards the elucidation of essential amino acid residues and/or polypeptide regions. Furthermore, the drug-stimulatable ATPase activity of P-glycoprotein has been established. The mechanism of drug transport by P-glycoprotein, however, is still unknown and its physiological role remains a matter of speculation.