Highly Sensitive Analysis of the Interaction between HIV-1 Gag and Phosphoinositide Derivatives Based on Surface Plasmon Resonance

Gag localization and virus-like particle release mediated by the matrix domain of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 Gag are less dependent on phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate than those mediated by the matrix domain of HIV-1 Gag

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag matrix (MA) domain facilitates Gag targeting and binding to the plasma membrane (PM) during virus assembly. Interaction with a PM phospholipid, phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P(2)], plays a key role in these MA functions. Previous studies showed that overexpression of polyphosphoinositide 5-phosphatase IV (5ptaseIV), which depletes cellular PI(4,5)P(2), mislocalizes HIV-1 Gag to the cytosol and greatly reduces HIV-1 release efficiency. In this study, we sought to determine the role of the MA-PI(4,5)P(2) interaction in Gag localization and membrane binding of a deltaretrovirus, human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1). We compared the chimeric HIV-1 Gag (HTMA), in which MA was replaced with HTLV-1 MA, with wild-type HIV-1 and HTLV-1 Gag for PI(4,5)P(2) dependence. Our results demonstrate that, unlike HIV-1 Gag, subcellular localization of and VLP release by HTLV-1 and HTMA Gag were minimally sensitive to 5ptaseIV overexpression. These results suggest that the interaction of HTLV-1 MA with PI(4,5)P(2) is not essential for HTLV-1 particle assembly. Furthermore, liposome-binding analyses showed that both HTLV-1 and HTMA Gag can bind membrane efficiently even in the absence of PI(4,5)P(2). Efficient HTLV-1 Gag binding to liposomes was largely driven by electrostatic interaction, unlike that of HIV-1 Gag, which required specific interaction with PI(4,5)P(2). Furthermore, membrane binding of HTLV-1 Gag in vitro was not suppressed by RNA, in contrast to HIV-1 Gag. Altogether, our data suggest that Gag targeting and membrane binding mediated by HTLV-1 MA does not require PI(4,5)P(2) and that distinct mechanisms regulate HIV-1 and HTLV-1 Gag membrane binding.

Retroviral matrix and lipids, the intimate interaction

Retroviruses are enveloped viruses that assemble on the inner leaflet of cellular membranes. Improving biophysical techniques has recently unveiled many molecular aspects of the interaction between the retroviral structural protein Gag and the cellular membrane lipids. This interaction is driven by the N-terminal matrix domain of the protein, which probably undergoes important structural modifications during this process, and could induce membrane lipid distribution changes as well. This review aims at describing the molecular events occurring during MA-membrane interaction, and pointing out their consequences in terms of viral assembly. The striking conservation of the matrix membrane binding mode among retroviruses indicates that this particular step is most probably a relevant target for antiviral research.

Assembly and replication of HIV-1 in T cells with low levels of phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate

HIV-1 Gag assembles into virus particles predominantly at the plasma membrane (PM). Previously, we observed that phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P(2)] is essential for Gag binding to the plasma membrane and virus release in HeLa cells. In the current study, we found that PI(4,5)P(2) also facilitates Gag binding to the PM and efficient virus release in T cells. Notably, serial passage of HIV-1 in an A3.01 clone that expresses polyphosphoinositide 5-phosphatase IV (5ptaseIV), which depletes cellular PI(4,5)P(2), yielded an adapted mutant with a Leu-to-Arg change at matrix residue 74 (74LR). Virus replication in T cells expressing 5ptaseIV was accelerated by the 74LR mutation relative to replication of wild type HIV-1 (WT). This accelerated replication of the 74LR mutant was not due to improved virus release. In control T cells, the 74LR mutant releases virus less efficiently than does the WT, whereas in cells expressing 5ptaseIV, the WT and the 74LR mutant are similarly inefficient in virus release. Unexpectedly, we found that the 74LR mutation increased virus infectivity and compensated for the inefficient virus release. Altogether, these results indicate that PI(4,5)P(2) is essential for Gag-membrane binding, targeting of Gag to the PM, and efficient virus release in T cells, which in turn likely promotes efficient virus spread in T cell cultures. In T cells with low PI(4,5)P(2) levels, however, the reduced virus particle production can be compensated for by a mutation that enhances virus infectivity.