51
|
Zorzetto C, Sánchez-Mateo CC, Rabanal RM, Lupidi G, Petrelli D, Vitali LA, Bramucci M, Quassinti L, Caprioli G, Papa F, Ricciutelli M, Sagratini G, Vittori S, Maggi F. Phytochemical analysis and in vitro biological activity of three Hypericum species from the Canary Islands (Hypericum reflexum, Hypericum canariense and Hypericum grandifolium). Fitoterapia 2014; 100:95-109. [PMID: 25464055 DOI: 10.1016/j.fitote.2014.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2014] [Revised: 11/12/2014] [Accepted: 11/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In the present work we carried out a phytochemical and biological investigation on three Hypericum species, i.e. Hypericum reflexum, Hypericum canariense and Hypericum grandifolium, from the Canary Islands where they are traditionally used as diuretic, wound healing, vermifuge, sedative and antidepressive agents. The polar extracts of the top flowering aerial parts, prepared by Soxhlet apparatus using a methanol-acetone (1:1) extracting mixture, were analyzed by HPLC-DAD and HPLC-MS for the content of eight biomarkers such as hypericin, hyperforin, chlorogenic acid, rutin, hyperoside, isoquercitrin, quercitrin and quercetin, whereas the hydrodistilled essential oils were analyzed by GC-FID and GC-MS. The three Hypericum species had different results in both polar and volatile constituents, H. reflexum being the only one endowed with a small amount of naphtodianthrones (hypericin and pseudohypericin), and containing high levels of chlorogenic acid, rutin and volatile mono- and sesquiterpenes. After chemical characterization, all products were in vitro biologically assayed for antiproliferative activity on human tumor cell lines by MTT assay, for antioxidant potential by DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays, and for antimicrobial activity by the agar disc diffusion and microdilution methods. Results revealed interesting bioactivities and differences between polar extracts and essential oils, with the former being endowed with significant antioxidant activity and the latter with comparable inhibition effects on the tumor cells (A375, MDA-MB 231 and HCT 116) to that of cisplatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Zorzetto
- Departamento de Medicina Física y Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Candelaria C Sánchez-Mateo
- Departamento de Medicina Física y Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Rosa M Rabanal
- Departamento de Medicina Física y Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Giulio Lupidi
- School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | - Dezemona Petrelli
- School of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | - Luca A Vitali
- School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Fabrizio Papa
- School of Science and Technology, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | | | | | - Sauro Vittori
- School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | - Filippo Maggi
- School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Dhopeshwarkar A, Mackie K. CB2 Cannabinoid receptors as a therapeutic target-what does the future hold? Mol Pharmacol 2014; 86:430-7. [PMID: 25106425 DOI: 10.1124/mol.114.094649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The past decades have seen an exponential rise in our understanding of the endocannabinoid system, comprising CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors, endogenous cannabinoids (endocannabinoids), and the enzymes that synthesize and degrade endocannabinoids. The primary focus of this review is the CB2 receptor. CB2 receptors have been the subject of considerable attention, primarily due to their promising therapeutic potential for treating various pathologies while avoiding the adverse psychotropic effects that can accompany CB1 receptor-based therapies. With the appreciation that CB2-selective ligands show marked functional selectivity, there is a renewed opportunity to explore this promising area of research from both a mechanistic as well as a therapeutic perspective. In this review, we summarize our present knowledge of CB2 receptor signaling, localization, and regulation. We discuss the availability of genetic tools (and their limitations) to study CB2 receptors and also provide an update on preclinical data on CB2 agonists in pain models. Finally, we suggest possible reasons for the failure of CB2 ligands in clinical pain trials and offer possible ways to move the field forward in a way that can help reconcile the inconsistencies between preclinical and clinical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amey Dhopeshwarkar
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Gill Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
| | - Ken Mackie
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Gill Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|