Current diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis

Leptomeningeal Metastasis: Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment

As therapeutic options and supportive care for the treatment of neoplastic disease have improved, there has been an associated increase in the incidence of leptomeningeal disease. In this review, the clinical presentation, natural history, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options for this often devastating sequela of solid tumors, lymphoma, and leukemia will be summarized. The therapeutic efficacy of ionizing radiation, systemic agents, and intrathecal drugs will be examined from the existing literature. Additionally the pathophysiology, which in part defines the therapeutic limitations in approaching this patient population, will be discussed in order to assist in individualized clinical decision making.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most common cause of mortality among women with gynecologic malignancies and the fifth leading cause of death in all women. It usually spreads locally; hematogenous dissemination is rare, most often involving the liver and lungs. Cerebral metastases are reported in less than 2% of cases and tend to localize to the parenchyma, usually in the cerebrum. Leptomeningeal involvement is exceptionally rare. We report a case of a woman with metastatic ovarian cancer who developed leptomeningeal carcinomatosis while receiving systemic chemotherapy. We also provide an extensive review of the existing literature on neoplastic meningitis from ovarian cancer.

Neoplastic meningitis resulting from hematological malignancies: pharmacokinetic considerations and maximizing outcome

Neoplastic meningitis, also known as leptomeningeal metastases, is a complication of various types of cancer that occurs when tumor cells enter the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), travel along CSF pathways and grow. Treatment options include drug delivery directly into the CNS or systemic administration for targeted action in the CNS. CNS drug delivery is limited by the blood-brain barrier and the blood-CSF barrier. It may be possible to partially overcome this by using high-dose systemic therapy; however, this is done at the possible expense of increased systemic toxicity. Intra-CSF drug delivery bypasses the blood-brain barrier and allows direct access of the chemotherapeutic agent to the CSF. Because neoplastic meningitis occurs in an increasingly large percentage of all cancer patients, it is imperative to optimize drug delivery to the CSF and meninges. Both the pharmacokinetic profile of the chemotherapeutic agent and the site of administration influence therapeutic efficacy. Achieving prolonged therapeutic cytotoxic drug concentrations and even distribution in the CSF will improve efficacy. In this article we summarize data on the efficacy, safety and outcome of high-dose systemic and intra-CSF treatments.

[18F]fluorothymidine PET imaging in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal involvement with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The diagnosis of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis remains difficult despite improvement in central nervous system (CNS) imaging and cytologic examination of the cerebral spinal fluid. False-negative results are common, providing obstacles in assessing both prophylactic and therapeutic efforts. As a result of increased survival of patients with a variety of systemic neoplasms it is likely that central nervous involvement will need to be addressed more often. This article presents a patient with a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with polymorphic features. Imaging using ¹⁸F-labeled fluorodeoxythymidine (FLT) proved useful in demonstrating both parenchymal and leptomeningeal CNS involvement. The potential for FLT to identify proliferative tissue may make it uniquely suitable for detection of CNS malignant disease.

Radiotherapeutic Options for Symptom Control in Breast Cancer

SUMMARY: The majority of breast cancer patients will require radiation therapy at some time during the course of their disease. An estimated 30-50% of all radiation treatments are of palliative nature, either to alleviate symptoms or prophylactic to prevent deterioration of quality of life due to locally progressive disease. Radiotherapy is a locally effective tool, and typically causes no systemic and mostly mild acute side effects. The following article provides an overview of options and decision-making in palliative radiotherapy for symptom control.

Leptomeningeal metastasis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Leptomeningeal metastasis occurs in approximately 5% of all patients with cancer. This review summarizes recent literature regarding methods of diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Staging of leptomeningeal metastasis should include contrast-enhanced brain and spine MRI, and though controversial, radionuclide cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow study. Treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis often requires involved-field radiotherapy to bulky or symptomatic disease sites as well as intra-CSF and systemic chemotherapy. The use of high-dose systemic therapy may benefit patients with leptomeningeal metastasis and obviate the need for intra-CSF chemotherapy. Intra-CSF drug therapy primarily utilizes one of three chemotherapeutic agents [i.e. methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside (both free and liposomal) and thio-tetraethylenepentamine] administered by a variety of schedules either by intralumbar or intraventricular drug delivery. Novel intra-CSF agents increasingly utilized in the treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis are targeted mAbs such as rituximab and trastuzumab.

SUMMARY

Although treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis is palliative with median patient survival of 2-3 months, treatment may afford stabilization and protection from further neurologic deterioration in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis.

Diagnosis and individualized therapy of neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis is a diffuse dissemination of tumor cells into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and/or leptomeninges. It occurs in approximately 5-10% of malignant diseases, most often in breast cancer, lung cancer, melanoma or B-cell lymphoma. Symptoms of neoplastic meningitis are head or back pain, cranial nerve palsies, diffuse radicular symptoms or psychiatric disturbances. MRI shows nodular contrast enhancement lining CSF spaces. Positive CSF cytology requires optimal sampling and processing. Treatment must be individually shaped: the CSF dissemination may be treated with intrathecal chemotherapy with methotrexate or cytarabinoside (Ara-C). Liposomal Ara-C is distributed over the entire CSF space even after lumbar application and maintains cytotoxic levels for at least 2 weeks. Radiotherapy should be applied only to symptomatic solid spinal manifestations or fast progressing cranial nerve palsies. Systemic chemotherapy is needed to control solid manifestations or, in the case of substances entering the CSF, to support intrathecal chemotherapy.

Meningeal and brainstem infiltration by a malignant mesothelioma

Malignant mesothelioma is an uncommon neoplasia which primarily involves the pleura or peritoneum. Central nervous system involvement is rare. A rare presentation of metastatic pleural mesothelioma, which had infiltrated the meninges and brainstem, is described. The patient presented with diplopia following a 2-week history of malaise, myalgia, mild headache and diarrhoea. Clinical examination found global areflexia, cerebellar ataxia and bilateral sixth nerve palsies. Differential diagnoses included the Miller-Fisher variant of Guillain-Barre syndrome, malignant meningitis and infectious meningitis. The patient was treated with immunoglobulins, plasmaphoresis and corticosteroids; however, he deteriorated and died 31 days after admission. Retrospective examination of the MRI of the brain found diffuse low attenuation changes within the pons and cerebral peduncles. Postmortem examination favoured a diagnosis of an early sarcomatoid malignant mesothelioma of pleural origin with leptomeningeal metastatic deposits.

Neoplastic meningitis.Review of a clinical series

INTRODUCTION

The increase in the ageing population in the last decades has led to an increased frequency of cancer-associated complications. Among these, neurological disorders stand out, as they appear in 10-30% of patients with systemic neoplasia. Neoplastic meningitis accounts for 4-15% of patients with solid tumours and it has a poor prognosis. The objective of this paper is to describe the clinical, imaging and prognostic characteristics as well as cerebrospinal fluid findings in a series of neoplastic meningitis.

BACKGROUND AND DEVELOPMENT

We performed a retrospective review of all patients admitted to the Hospital Universitario of Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín with clinical suspicion of neoplastic meningitis between 1990 and 2008. We selected 37 patients with an average age ranging from 15 to 75 years old. A total of 81.8% of the cases in which a primary tumour was found were associated with solid tumours (24.2% were located in the breast, and 24.2% in the lung). The most frequent sign of cranial nerve dysfunction was dyplopia, which was observed in 32.4% of the cases. The average survival rate after diagnosis was 87.9 days (12.6 weeks). The cerebrospinal fluid cytology was positive in 46.4% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

Neoplastic meningitis is a severe complication of both solid and haematological tumours. We stress the importance of maintaining a high level of suspicion to achieve early diagnosis, since the average survival probability for neoplastic meningitis patients is low.

Biology and therapy of neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) occurs in 5% to 8% of cancer patients, commonly as an end-stage process in previously metastatic disease. As newer therapeutics extend patient survival by maintaining long-term control of systemic malignancies, the incidence of NM is likely to rise. This can be expected both because of a change in the natural history of the underlying disease and the generally poor penetrance of many newer anticancer drugs into the central nervous system, thereby creating a sanctuary site for malignant cells. Currently available treatments have provided limited benefit in overall survival in NM, although long-term survival does occur. Because of the morbidity occasionally associated with treatment, prognostic indicators are being analyzed to identify patients who may benefit from systemic and/or intrathecal therapy before making the decision to initiate treatment. Additionally, because of the relative insensitivity of traditional cerebrospinal fluid analysis, new markers of NM are being investigated. This endeavor is being aided by ongoing research into the underlying biology of the metastatic process.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Cytology and Clinical Analysis of 34 Cases with Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis

The clinical characteristics and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytological features of 34 hospitalized patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) were studied. Most patients presented with signs of meningeal irritation (19 cases) and intra-cranial hypertension (23 cases). Computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed brain parenchymal lesions, hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal enhancement (nine, six and eight cases, respectively). The CSF changes included high opening pressure (21 cases), increased white blood cell count (23 cases), elevated protein levels (25 cases) and low glucose levels (17 cases). Malignant cells were found in all CSF specimens and 32 cases had malignant cells in their initial CSF examinations. High serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) occurred in 11 patients. Signs of meningeal irritation and intra-cranial hypertension were common. It is concluded that serum CEA measurement along with CT and MRI scanning are helpful in the diagnosis of LC. Crucially, however, CSF cytology could be the most important technique for the diagnosis of LC.

Gastric leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: Multi-center retrospective analysis of 54 cases

AIM: To identify the clinical features and outcomes of infrequently reported leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) of gastric cancer.

METHODS: We analyzed 54 cases of cytologically confirmed gastric LMC at four institutions from 1994 to 2007.

RESULTS: The male-to-female ratio was 32:22, and the patients ranged in age from 28 to 78 years (median, 48.5 years). The majority of patients had advanced disease at initial diagnosis of gastric cancer. The clinical or pathologic tumor, node and metastasis stage of the primary gastric cancer was IV in 38 patients (70%). The median interval from diagnosis of the primary malignancy to the diagnosis of LMC was 6.3 mo, ranging between 0 and 73.1 mo. Of the initial endoscopic findings for the 45 available patients, 23 (51%) of the patients were Bormann type III and 15 (33%) patients were Bormann type IV. Pathologically, 94% of cases proved to be poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas. Signet ring cell component was also observed in 40% of patients. Headache (85%) and nausea/vomiting (58%) were the most common presenting symptoms of LMC. A gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was conducted in 51 patients. Leptomeningeal enhancement was noted in 45 cases (82%). Intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy was administered to 36 patients-primarily methotrexate alone (61%), but also in combination with hydrocortisone/± Ara-C (39%). The median number of IT treatments was 7 (range, 1-18). Concomitant radiotherapy was administered to 18 patients, and concomitant chemotherapy to seven patients. Seventeen patients (46%) achieved cytological negative conversion. Median overall survival duration from the diagnosis of LMC was 6.7 wk (95% CI: 4.3-9.1 wk). In the univariate analysis of survival duration, hemoglobin, IT chemotherapy, and cytological negative conversion showed superior survival duration (P = 0.038, P = 0.010, and P = 0.002, respectively). However, in our multivariate analysis, only cytological negative conversion was predictive of relatively longer survival duration (3.6, 6.7 and 14.6 wk, P = 0.030, RR: 0.415, 95% CI: 0.188-0.918).

CONCLUSION: Although these patients had a fatal clinical course, cytologic negative conversion by IT chemotherapy may improve survival.

Comparative risk of leptomeningeal dissemination of cancer after surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery for a single supratentorial solid tumor metastasis

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that differential risks of developing leptomeningeal disease (LMD) exist in patients having a single supratentorial brain metastasis resected via a piecemeal or en bloc approach or treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2006, 827 patients with a supratentorial brain metastasis underwent resection or SRS at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The primary outcome was the incidence of LMD.

RESULTS

Resection was performed piecemeal in 191 patients and en bloc in 351 patients; 285 patients received SRS. LMD occurred in 33 patients, 29 in the resection group and 4 in the SRS group. Risk of LMD was significantly higher with piecemeal tumor resection than with other procedures (SRS: hazard ratio [HR] for piecemeal, 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-17.2; P = 0.002; en bloc, HR for piecemeal, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3-5.6; P = 0.009). The difference between piecemeal and en bloc was particularly pronounced in patients with a melanoma primary (HR, 8.4; 95% CI, 1.8-39.2; P = 0.007). The risk of LMD was not significantly different between en bloc resection and SRS (HR for en bloc, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.7-6.4; P = 0.21). Similar results were obtained when comparing effects of SRS and both resection approaches after limiting the sample to patients with tumors in a specific volume range.

CONCLUSION

Piecemeal resection of a supratentorial brain metastasis carries a higher risk of LMD than en bloc resection or SRS. Further assessment of the role of the 2 surgical resection approaches and SRS in a controlled prospective setting with large numbers of patients is warranted.

Palliative ventriculoperitoneal shunt in a pediatric patient with recurrent metastatic medulloblastoma

The authors present a case report of a pediatric patient with recurrent metastatic medulloblastoma who demonstrated significant clinical improvement after placement of a palliative ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. They also review the medical literature that supports palliative surgical management of hydrocephalus and intracranial hypertension (ICH) caused by leptomeningeal (LM) spread of malignancy. The burdens and benefits of an invasive surgical procedure must always be weighed carefully, especially at end-of-life. Yet for some patients with LM spread and ICH, VP shunting may improve their quality of life, although their prognosis remains poor.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: prognostic implications of clinical and cerebrospinal fluid features

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) represents a devastating complication of systemic cancer, and patients with LC have a dismal prognosis and increased mortality. The few studies that have focused on the evaluation of prognostic factors in patients with LC have resulted in contradictory results. Thus, the treatment of LC remains controversial, and no straightforward guidelines exist in the literature. The objective of the current study was to identify prognostic markers related to LC survival to better select patients who are eligible for intensive treatment.

METHODS

Seventy patients who had a diagnosis of LC were reviewed, and clinical data, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters, tumor-related characteristics, and treatment information were registered. The impact of single parameters on overall survival was determined by both univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis revealed that Radiation Therapy Oncology Group score<or=2 (P=.028), a glucose level in CSF>or=2.7 mmol/L (P=.001), the presence of infratentorial symptoms at onset (P=.026), and intrathecal treatment (P<.001) were associated independently with longer overall survival in patients with LC. In addition, the same clinical factors also predicted response to treatment in such patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive factors for patients with LC that were identified in this study could help to better select patients who are more likely to benefit from chemotherapy.

Leptomeningeal neoplasms

Leptomeningeal metastasis is becoming an increasingly important late complication of cancer as survival from systemic disease increases, and due to the fact that many novel cancer drugs fail to achieve therapeutic concentrations in the central nervous system. It occurs when neoplastic cells enter cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathways, causing diffuse infiltration of the subarachnoid space of the brain and spinal cord. Definitive diagnosis is established by the demonstration of malignant cells in the CSF. However, in certain circumstances the presence of leptomeningeal enhancement on brain or spinal MRI may be sufficient to make the diagnosis. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment may delay neurologic progression and can lead to prolonged survival and improvement of neurologic function in certain patients. The prognosis depends on the underlying malignancy but is often poor, with a median survival of 4 months, and most treatment interventions are palliative. Nevertheless, some patients respond to treatment, and some survive beyond 1 or 2 years after diagnosis. Areas of radiographic bulky disease or symptomatic tumor should receive radiotherapy. Intrathecal chemotherapy is most effective in patients with lymphoma, leukemia, or breast cancer and without evidence of bulky disease on neuroimaging. Intrathecal chemotherapy requires normal CSF flow, and the most commonly used agents are methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa. In lieu of intrathecal therapy, systemic chemotherapy may occasionally be indicated in select patients in part based on its ability to penetrate into bulky disease. When hydrocephalus occurs, ventriculoperitoneal shunting frequently leads to rapid clinical improvement. There is hope that progress in diagnostic modalities and the development of more effective intrathecal antineoplastic drugs may decrease neurologic morbidity and improve quality of life and survival.

Chemotherapy administration directly into the fourth ventricle in a new piglet model. Laboratory Investigation

OBJECT

The authors hypothesized that chemotherapy infusions directly into the fourth ventricle may potentially play a role in treating malignant posterior fossa tumors. In this study the safety and pharmacokinetics of etoposide administration into the fourth ventricle was tested using an indwelling catheter in piglets.

METHODS

A closed-tip silicone lumbar drain catheter was inserted into the fourth ventricle via a posterior fossa craniectomy and 5 daily infusions of etoposide (0.5 mg in 5 animals) or normal saline (in 2 animals) were instilled. Piglets (10-18 kg, 2-3 months of age) underwent daily neurological examinations and 4.7-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after the final infusion and were then killed for postmortem examination. Pharmacokinetics were studied using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples at 0.25, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after etoposide infusion. Peak and trough CSF etoposide levels were measured for each subsequent infusion. Serum etoposide levels were obtained at 2 and 4 hours after infusion.

RESULTS

All piglets remained neurologically intact, and MR images demonstrated catheter placement within the fourth ventricle without signal changes in the brainstem or cerebellum. Serum etoposide was absent at 2 and 4 hours after intraventricular infusions. When adequate samples could be obtained for analysis, CSF etoposide levels peaked 15 minutes after infusion and progressively decreased. Cytotoxic levels (> 0.1 microg/ml) were maintained for 5 consecutive peak and trough measurements with 1 exception. Etoposide-related neuropathology included moderate-to-severe T-lymphocytic meningitis and fourth and lateral ventricular choroid plexitis with associated subependymal inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

Etoposide can be infused directly into the fourth ventricle without clinical or imaging evidence of damage. Cytotoxic CSF etoposide levels can be maintained for 24 hours with a single daily infusion into the fourth ventricle using an indwelling catheter. Intraventricular etoposide elicits an inflammatory response, the long-term effects of which are as yet undetermined.

Treatment of central nervous system metastases: parenchymal, epidural, and leptomeningeal

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With prolonged survival from systemic therapies in the adjuvant and salvage setting, and because these agents cannot cross the intact blood-brain barrier, central nervous system metastases are becoming a therapeutic challenge in oncology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent therapeutic achievements include an extended use of surgery and radiosurgery. Although each of these treatment modalities has its own indications, in patients eligible for both treatments the upfront comparison of these two techniques has not been performed yet. Systemic chemotherapies and biotherapies may be effective in the management of central nervous system metastases as they may act on both neurologic and extra-central nervous system lesions. In the treatment of epidural metastases, a surgical procedure providing immediate direct circumferential decompression of the spinal cord followed by local irradiation has been demonstrated in a prospective randomized trial. The management of leptomeningeal metastases remains controversial and of limited efficacy especially in chemoresistant tumours and still relies on the combination of chemotherapy (intrathecal and intravenous) and focal radiotherapy.

SUMMARY

Aggressive treatments in patients with early diagnosis and in whom central nervous system metastases are the life-threatening location may provide a substantial increase in survival and favourably affect quality of life.

Comparative risk of leptomeningeal disease after resection or stereotactic radiosurgery for solid tumor metastasis to the posterior fossa

Object

The authors tested the hypothesis that patients with metastatic posterior fossa lesions (MPFLs) treated with resection have a higher risk of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) than those with MPFLs treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

Methods

Between 1993 and 2004, 379 patients with MPFLs were treated with resection or SRS at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The authors' primary study outcome was the incidence of LMD, as diagnosed with cerebrospinal fluid cytological analysis and/or neuroimaging.

Results

Resection was performed in 260 patients, whereas 119 patients underwent SRS. The median patient age was 56 years, 51% of patients were male, and 93% had a Karnofsky Performance Scale score $ 70. The most common primary cancers were those of the lung, breast, and kidney, as well as melanoma. Leptomeningeal dissemination of cancer occurred in 33 patients: 26 in the resection group and 7 in the SRS group (resection group: rate ratio [RR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89–4.75, p = 0.09). Piecemeal tumor resection (137 cases) was associated with a significantly higher risk of LMD than en bloc resection (123 cases; RR 3.4, 95% CI 1.43–8.12, p = 0.006) or SRS (RR 3.37, 95% CI 1.41–8.04, p = 0.006), and there was no significant difference in the risk for LMD between en bloc resection and SRS (en bloc resection: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.34–2.81, p = 0.98). The multivariate RR and significance associated with piecemeal resection, however, were consistent, with a strong effect (RR 2.45, 95% CI 1.19–5.02, p = 0.02) and no indication of biases associated with tumor size, location, or cystic/necrotic appearance.

Conclusions

There is an increased risk of LMD after piecemeal resection of an MPFL. This increase, although clinically and statistically significant, is not as alarming as previously reported and is absent when en bloc removal is achieved. Further assessment of the role of resection in a controlled prospective setting is warranted.

Treatment of lymphomatous and leukemic meningitis with liposomal encapsulated cytarabine

Liposomal encapsulated cytarabine (DepoCyte, Mundipharma GmbH, Limburg/Lahn, Germany) is a slow-release formulation of conventional cytarabine. It is licensed for intrathecal use in patients with lymphomatous and leukemic meningitis. DepoCyte obtained superior response rates, improved patient quality of life and improved the time to neurological progression in a randomized albeit small clinical trial. In this review we briefly summarize the clinical data and discuss them in light of clinical problems and possible treatment scenarios.

Primary meningeal lymphoma of T-cell origin: a rare presentation of primary central nervous system lymphomas

Primary meningeal lymphoma is a rare clinical entity. Central nervous system infiltration by systemic lymphoma should always be excluded. Diagnosis can be difficult, and prognosis is usually poor. Most are of B-cell origin. We present the case of a young man with a primary meningeal lymphoma of T-cell origin. He was treated with systemic chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine and intraventricular chemotherapy. He had a clinical improvement and a complete remission, with a long overall survival. There is no standard treatment for this rare disease. Traditionally, treatment has been based in craniospinal radiation therapy and intrathecal chemotherapy, with poor overall results. More recently, systemic chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate has been advocated, which could avoid the long-term toxicity of craniospinal radiation therapy, and could improve the prognosis of these patients.

Metastatic neurologic complications of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Neurologic complications of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma represent challenging diagnostic and therapeutic issues. Leptomeningeal, epidural, and brain metastases are the most common neurologic complications, and each is associated with a poor prognosis. However, early recognition and intervention often result in improved quality of life and, for a subset of patients, an opportunity for longer survival.

Lymphomatous meningitis in primary central nervous system lymphoma

✓Lymphomatous meningitis (LM) due to primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is an uncommon problem in neurooncology and can occur at time of diagnosis or recurrence. Notwithstanding frequent focal signs and symptoms, LM is a disease affecting the entire neuraxis, and therefore staging and treatment need to encompass all cere-brospinal fluid (CSF) compartments. Central nervous system staging of LM includes contrast agent–enhanced cranial computed tomography (CT) or Gd-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, Gd-enhanced spinal MR imaging, CT myelography, and radionuclide CSF flow study. Treatment of LM includes involved-field radiotherapy of bulky or symptomatic disease sites and intra-CSF drug therapy. The inclusion of concomitant systemic therapy can benefit patients with LM and can obviate the need for intra-CSF chemotherapy. At present, intra-CSF drug therapy is confined to three chemotherapeutic agents (methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, and thiotepa) administered by a variety of schedules either by intralumbar or intraventricular drug delivery. Although treatment of LM is palliative and the expected median survival of patients is 4 to 6 months, it often provides stabilization and protection from further neurological deterioration. In patients with primary CNS lymphoma, CNS prophylaxis has been recommended (using a combination of high-dose systemic chemotherapy and intra-CSF chemotherapy), but the strategy remains controversial because high-dose systemic methotrexate is commonly used as an adjuvant therapy. Patients with primary CNS lymphoma at high risk as defined by positive CSF cytology or neuroradiography consistent with LM may benefit from the inclusion of intra-CSF chemotherapy.

Neoplastic meningitis

BACKGROUND

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a common problem in neuro-oncology, occurring in approximately 5% of all patients with cancer.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Notwithstanding frequent focal signs and symptoms in NM, NM is a disease affecting the entire neuraxis, and therefore staging and treatment need encompass all cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartments.

RESULTS

Central nervous system (CNS) staging of NM includes contrast-enhanced cranial computed tomography (CE-CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MR-Gd), contrast-enhanced spine magnetic resonance imaging (MR-S) or computed tomographic myelography (CT-M), and radionuclide CSF flow study (FS). Treatment of NM incorporates involved-field radiotherapy of bulky or symptomatic disease sites and intra-CSF drug therapy. The inclusion of concomitant systemic therapy may benefit patients with NM and may obviate the need for intra-CSF chemotherapy. At present, intra-CSF drug therapy is confined to 3 chemotherapeutic agents (ie, methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, and thio-TEPA) administered by a variety of schedules either by intralumbar or intraventricular drug delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although treatment of NM is palliative, with an expected median patient survival of 2 to 6 months, it often affords stabilization and protection from further neurologic deterioration in patients with NM.

Neoplastic meningitis from systemic malignancies: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment

Long-term survival is occasionally observed in patients with neoplastic meningitis (NM) accompanying breast cancer (13% one-year and 6% 2-year survival), melanoma, and lymphoma, but in general the survival of most patients is short and averages only 3 to 4 months. The incidence of NM appears to be increasing, in part due to earlier detection by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and in part due to development of more effective therapies for systemic cancer, which has resulted in a larger subset at risk for late-stage development of this complication. Survival of NM patients is negatively affected by concomitant progression of systemic disease despite multiple prior therapies. However, there are certain prognostic factors that have been identified as "favorable" in retrospective series, including age less than 60 years, long symptom duration, controlled systemic disease, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or =70, lack of encephalopathy or cranial nerve deficits, low initial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein level, history of breast primary tumor, and lack of evidence of CSF compartmentalization or bulky meningeal disease as determined by CSF flow studies. Standard treatment has traditionally involved radiotherapy (RT) to sites of symptomatic or bulky disease, as detected by neuroimaging, and in selected patients, the administration of intrathecal, intraventricular, or systemic chemotherapy. However, treatment remains palliative and many patients and physicians choose supportive care only. Future hope is provided by studies that have improved our understanding of the disease pathogenesis, have identified prognostic variables associated with outcome, and have provided new therapeutic approaches, such as administration of high-dose systemic chemotherapy and investigations of novel therapeutic agents.

Neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis is a complication of the CNS that occurs in 3-5% of patients with cancer and is characterised by multifocal neurological signs and symptoms. Diagnosis is problematic because the disease is commonly the result of pleomorphic manifestations of neoplastic meningitis and co-occurrence of disease at other sites. Useful tests to establish diagnosis and guide treatment include MRI of the brain and spine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology, and radioisotope CSF flow studies. Assessment of the extent of disease of the CNS is of value because large-volume subarachnoid disease or CSF flow obstruction is prognostically significant. Radiotherapy is an established and beneficial treatment for patients with neoplastic meningitis with large tumour volume including parenchymal brain metastasis, sites of symptomatic disease, or CSF flow block. Because neoplastic meningitis affects the entire neuraxis, chemotherapy treatment can include intra-CSF fluid (either intraventricular or intralumbar) or systemic therapy. Most patients (>70%) with neoplastic meningitis have progressive systemic disease and consequently treatment is palliative and tumour response is of restricted durability. Furthermore, as there is no compelling evidence of a survival advantage with aggressive multimodal treatment, future trials need be done to determine the effect of treatment on quality of life and control of neurological symptoms.

Constitutive integrin activation on tumor cells contributes to progression of leptomeningeal metastases

Leptomeningeal metastases are a serious neurological complication in cancer patients and associated with a dismal prognosis. Tumor cells that enter the subarachnoid space adhere to the leptomeninges and form tumor deposits. It is largely unknown which adhesion molecules mediate tumor cell adhesion to leptomeninges. We studied the role of integrin expression and activation in the progression of leptomeningeal metastases. For this study, we used a mouse acute lymphocytic leukemic cell line that was grown in suspension (L1210-S cell line) to develop an adherent L1210 cell line (L1210-A) by selectively culturing the few adherent cells in the cell culture. beta1, beta2, and beta3 integrins were in a constitutively high active state on L1210-A cells and in a low, but inducible, active state on L1210-S cells. Expression levels of these integrins were comparable in the two cell lines. Static adhesion levels of L1210-A cells on a leptomeningeal cell layer were significantly higher than those of L1210-S cells. All mice that were injected intrathecally with L1210-A cells died rapidly of leptomeningeal leukemia. In contrast, 45% long-term survival was seen after intrathecal injection of mice with L1210-S cells. Our data indicate that constitutive integrin activation on leukemic cells promotes progression of leptomeningeal leukemia by increased tumor cell adhesion to the leptomeninges. We argue that an aberrantly regulated inside-out signaling pathway underlies constitutive integrin activation on the adherent leukemic cell population.

Leptomeningeal metastases from solid malignancy: a review

Leptomeningeal metastases (LMM) consist of diffuse involvement of the leptomeninges by infiltrating cancer cells. In solid tumors, the most frequent primary sites are lung and breast cancers, two tumors where the incidence of LMM is apparently increasing. Careful neurological examination is required to demonstrate multifocal involvement of the central nervous system (CNS), cranial nerves, and spinal roots, which constitute the clinical hallmark of the disease. Cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) analysis is almost always abnormal but only a positive cytology or demonstration of intrathecal synthesis of tumor markers is diagnostic. T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced sequence of the entire neuraxis (brain and spine) plays an important role in supporting the diagnosis, demonstrating the involved sites and guiding treatment. Radionuclide CSF flow studies detect CSF compartmentalization and are useful for treatment planning. Standard therapy relies mainly on focal irradiation and intrathecal or systemic chemotherapy. Studies using other therapeutic approaches such as new biological or cytotoxic compounds are ongoing. The overall prognosis remains grim and quality of life should remain the priority when deciding which treatment option to apply. However, a sub-group of patients, tentatively defined here, may benefit from an aggressive treatment.

Leptomeningeal cancer in the pediatric patient

The treatment and prophylaxis of leptomeningeal leukemia and lymphoma in children has dramatically improved disease control and long-term survival. However, the treatment of other leptomeningeal cancers has been less successful and the neurologic morbidity associated with central nervous system-directed therapy has a significant long-term impact on quality of life. Further research is critical to identify new therapeutic strategies for children with or at high risk for leptomeningeal cancer.

Leukemic and lymphomatous meningitis: incidence, prognosis and treatment

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a common problem in neuro-oncology occurring in approximately 5% of all patients with cancer. Notwithstanding frequent focal signs and symptoms in NM, NM is a disease affecting the entire neuraxis and therefore staging and treatment need encompass all cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartments. Central nervous system (CNS) staging of NM includes contrast enhanced cranial computerized tomography (CE-CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MR-Gd), contrast enhanced spine magnetic resonance imaging (MR-S) or computerized tomographic myelography (CT-M) and radionuclide CSF flow study (FS). Treatment of NM involves involved-field radiotherapy of bulky or symptomatic disease sites and intra-CSF drug therapy. The inclusion of concomitant systemic therapy may benefit patients with NM and may obviate the need for intra-CSF chemotherapy. At present, intra-CSF drug therapy is confined to three chemotherapeutic agents (i.e. methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside and thio-TEPA) administered by a variety of schedules either by intralumbar or intraventricular drug delivery. Although treatment of NM is palliative with an expected median patient survival of 4 to 6 months, it often affords stabilization and protection from further neurologic deterioration in patients with NM. In patients with leukemia or lymphoma, prophylaxis of the CNS is used (utilizing a combination of high-dose systemic chemotherapy and intra-CSF chemotherapy) for patients at high risk as defined by specific tumor-related laboratory markers. Using such a risk-stratified approach, the late occurrence of CNS relapse has decreased dramatically attesting to the value of CNS prophylaxis.

Current treatment of leptomeningeal metastases: systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy and symptom management

Treatment of leptomeningeal metastases is multifaceted and includes symptomatic therapy, intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. As the majority of patients have widespread incurable systemic tumor, treatment is predominantly palliative; however, some patients with leukemia, lymphoma or breast cancer may have prolonged remissions and the possibility of cure.

Leptomeningeal metastases from leukemias and lymphomas

Leptomeningeal dissemination of lymphoma and leukemia differs from that of solid tumors in a number of clinically important aspects. Specific histologic variants of lymphoma and leukemia have such a high incidence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dissemination that assessing CSF cytology at diagnosis is crucial and prophylactic therapy of the CSF compartment is required. Furthermore, while the overall prognosis for patients with leptomeningeal metastases from leukemia and lymphoma is similar to solid tumors, selected patients have excellent response to therapy and attain durable remission. Therefore, aggressive treatment is warranted.

Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors (meningeal carcinomatosis)

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are increasingly recognized as a devastating complication of solid tumors. Improved treatment of primary malignancy and advances in diagnostic imaging have led to an apparent increase in the number of patients diagnosed with LM. Unfortunately, therapeutic options remain limited. Radiotherapy is used to treat bulky tumor and provide symptomatic relief. Intrathecal chemotherapy benefits a selected subset of patients. The challenge to the future is to delineate the molecular mechanisms underlying LM and to develop novel therapeutic or prophylactic modalities to combat LM.

Unusual Variants of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Rare variants of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) include unusual sites of presentation (eg, neurolymphomatosis and primary leptomeningeal lymphoma) and uncommon pathologic entities. Neurolymphomatosis involves peripheral nerves and nerve roots in addition to systemic and central nervous system (CNS) sites. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion, and treatment incorporates the principles of therapy for systemic and CNS lymphoma. Primary leptomeningeal lymphoma can present with symptoms of raised intracranial pressure or cranial or spinal polyradiculopathies. Diagnosis can be made by examining cerebrospinal fluid and incorporating immunophenotyping and molecular pathology techniques. Treatment options include irradiation and intrathecal or systemic chemotherapy. The features of PCNSL of T-cell origin and indolent B-cell PCNSL also are discussed.

Potential role of chemo-radiation with oral capecitabine in a breast cancer patient with central nervous system relapse

A 54-year-old woman underwent mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection for infiltrating ductal carcinoma with multiple lymph node involvement. The patient received adriamycin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (AC) followed by weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) and external irradiation to the local lymph node regions as adjuvant treatment. After 1 year and 5 months, the patient suffered her first recurrence, developing multiple brain and meningeal metastases. CNS involvement was well controlled by oral capecitabine (2400 mg twice daily, on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) and external whole brain irradiation of 50 Gy with minimal toxicity. We suggest that capecitabine contributed to the favorable clinical course in this patient and believe that, as an oral agent, this drug may benefit patients with CNS metastases of breast cancer by allowing home-based therapy.

Neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a common problem in neuro-oncology occurring in approximately 5% of all patients with cancer, and is the third most common site of CNS metastases. NM is a disease affecting the entire neuraxis, and therefore clinical manifestations are pleomorphic affecting the spine, cranial nerves, and cerebral hemispheres. Because of craniospinal disease involvement, staging and treatment need to encompass all CSF compartments. Treatment of NM utilizes involved-field radiotherapy of bulky or symptomatic disease sites and intra-CSF drug therapy. The inclusion of concomitant systemic therapy may benefit patients with NM and may obviate the need for intra-CSF chemotherapy. At present, intra-CSF drug therapy is confined to three chemotherapeutic agents (ie, methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa) administered by a variety of schedules either by intralumbar or intraventricular drug delivery. Although treatment of NM is palliative with an expected median patient survival of 2 to 6 months, it often affords stabilization and protection from further neurologic deterioration in patients with NM.