Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons

Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and tumour necrosis factor-alpha gene polymorphisms in Turkish patients with allergic contact dermatitis

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that the family of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1 RA) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) genes are polymorphic and related to some inflammatory diseases. Allergic contact dermatitis is the classic presentation of delayed-type hypersensitivity responses to exogenous agents. A number of genes playing role in inflammatory response may be associated with allergic contact dermatitis.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether there is an association between IL-1RA and TNFalpha gene polymorphisms and allergic contact dermatitis in Turkish patients with allergic contact dermatitis.

METHODS

This study was performed by the collaboration of Departments of Dermatology and Medical Genetics, Ege University, Faculty of Medicine. A total of 50 patients (31 females and 19 males) with allergic contact dermatitis, and 100 age- and sex-matched controls (58 females and 42 males) were included in the study. IL-1RA Variable Number of Tandem Repeats (VNTR) polymorphism in intron 2 and TNFalpha-308G-A polymorphism were genotyped by using polymerase chain reaction and agarose gel electrophoresis.

RESULTS

The frequency of IL-1RA 1/2 (48%) genotype was significantly higher (P = 0.002) in patient group than that is found in control group (22%). The frequency of TNFalpha (TNF G-308A) G/G genotype was significantly higher in patient group (68%) than that is found in control group (31%) (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that TNFalpha (G/G) gene polymorphism may play role in susceptibility to allergic contact dermatitis in Turkish patients.

Skin differences, needs, and disorders across global populations

Accurately determining the incidence and prevalence of dermatologic disease in most large populations has been challenging for reasons ranging from the lack of easily quantifiable tests and measures to imprecision around definitions of race, ethnicity, photo skin type, pigmentation, and population groups. Compounding the problems with these categorizations is the fact that skin disease and skin health are affected not just by inherent risk factors but also by habits and environment. Thus, a fundamental question remains as we evaluate the effects of cultural and environmental factors: do genetic factors account for most of the difference that we see in skin types? Is the primary influence the way the skin mediates the environmental insult of UV radiation or how inflammation is handled? Is melanization the primary characteristic that we should measure and consider? This article will provide an introduction to current knowledge and future directions researchers are taking in differentiating both the biological differences of skin and the clinical manifestations of skin disease among the groups described above. This discussion will be followed by a brief overview of cultural practices and environmental factors that are known to have significant impact on skin disease and a summary of the most common conditions that are encountered worldwide.

Estimates of percutaneous toxicity of sulfur mustard vapor suitable for use in protective equipment standards

An analysis was performed of historical human chamber data for exposure to sulfur mustard vapor, in order to correlate skin exposure dosages with effects in a manner specifically suitable for use in protective clothing standards. Data were reanalyzed to take into account (1) body region variability of skin responses to a single acute exposure to sulfur mustard vapor, (2) effect of hot/humid versus cooler exposure, and (3) influence of clothing. This approach permits deriving predicted skin responses pertinent to a protective clothing wearer, for a relatively short single acute exposure to vapor (up to a few hours) under the hot/humid conditions expected within a protective ensemble. Values for permissible dermal exposure to sulfur mustard vapor are proposed for protected emergency responders or military serving in combat theaters that may be used in standards intended to be employed in conjunction with evaluation of vapor protection provided by individual protective equipment for protection against chemical warfare agents by Man-in-Simulant vapor test methods.

Health effects of recreational exposure to Moreton Bay, Australia waters during a Lyngbya majuscula bloom

A survey of residents in an area subject to annual toxic cyanobacterial blooms was undertaken to examine potential health effects of cyanobacteria toxins. The survey assessed the health of marine recreational water users in Deception Bay/Bribie Island area in northern Moreton Bay, Queensland, which is exposed to blooms of the nuisance and potentially harmful cyanobacterium Lyngbya majuscula. A postal survey was mailed to 5000 residents with a response rate of 27%. High numbers of people (78%) responding to the survey reported recreational water activity in Moreton Bay. Of those having marine recreational water activity, 34% reported at least one symptom after exposure to marine waters, with skin itching the most reported (23%). Younger participants had greater water exposure and symptoms than older participants. Participants with greater exposures were more likely to have skin and eye symptoms than less exposed groups, suggesting agents in the marine environment may have contributed to these symptoms. Of those entering Moreton Bay waters 29 (2.7%) reported severe skin symptoms, 12 of whom attended a health professional. Six (0.6%) reported the classic symptoms of recreational water exposure to L. majuscula, severe skin symptoms in the inguinal region. Participants with knowledge of L. majuscula were less likely to report less skin, gastrointestinal and fever and headache symptoms. In conclusion, high numbers of participants reported symptoms after exposure to waters subject to L. majuscula blooms but only a small number appeared to be serious in nature suggesting limited exposure to toxins.

The effect of population diversity on skin irritation

The impact of many human variables on the response to skin irritating substances has been studied to varying degrees, including the impact of age, sex, and atopic status. However, the importance of ethnic origin has been more difficult to investigate, leading to a relative paucity of compelling data, either for or against the existence of differences. A primary reason for this lack is that studies on different ethnic groups often have to be undertaken in different locations thus introducing variables, e.g. time, environmental conditions that confound interpretations. In the present work, an attempt has been made to eliminate all variables except ethnicity by conducting a study on 2 distinct populations (Punjabis and Tamils) at the same location on the same day with a single assessor of the skin reactions, using sodium lauryl sulfate as the skin irritant. The skin reactions were assessed visually, and it was demonstrated that the modality of the reactions in these 2 populations had clear differences, but that the dose-response profiles were very similar. Thus, although the irritant response was expressed differently (e.g. erythema was much less evident in the darker Tamil population), the overall outcome was that the populations reacted in an equivalent manner.

In vitro skin irritation testing on reconstituted human epidermis: Reproducibility for 50 chemicals tested with two protocols

Since it is of high importance to establish the skin irritation potential of industrial chemicals, toxicologists developed tests on various skin models. Most test data come from the rabbit Draize test, but its reproducibility is questionable. Some human in vivo test data exist, but they concern only few compounds. The emergence of new tools such as reconstituted human skin tissues offers a promising future to alternative methods. We describe here two in vitro skin irritation test protocols performed on reconstituted human epidermis. One is a direct topical application test and the other an in vitro patch test. Both protocols were performed using multiple endpoint analysis including cell viability (MTT reduction), histology, and IL-1alpha release. Fifty chemicals were tested: 20 compounds were used in the ECVAM pre-validation study and 30 products were previously tested in a human in vivo patch test. These in vitro skin irritation tests have not only the advantages of enhanced convenience and of reduced costs, but a good reproducibility is observed by endpoint, and by compound. A prediction model is proposed to classify the chemicals as irritant or non-irritant, and the results are compared to available rabbit and human data. We do not wish to overgeneralize from these 50 compounds; but, instead suggest that this data set be extensively extended to include chemicals of varying physico-chemical properties.

Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method

Predictive skin irritation test methods, which do not require use of animals, are needed for the pre-market assessment of detergent formulations. The utility of a novel and ethical human acute skin irritation patch test method, originally developed for chemical skin irritation assessment, was evaluated. In this IRB-approved method, subjects were patched under occlusion for increasing periods of time up to 4h in duration. The total incidence of positive skin reactions for test products was compared to a positive control (20% aqueous sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]). Acutely irritating formulas were defined as those showing a significantly increased or equal incidence of positive responders compared with that of SDS. The time of exposure required for 50% of subjects to show a positive skin reaction (TR50 value) was calculated for each product and enabled test product comparisons within and between studies. Using this approach, 24 detergent formulations of various types were tested in seven individual studies. The skin irritation profiles were generally consistent within product types, which could be categorized as follows (by decreasing irritancy): mold/mildew removers (average TR50 = 0.37 h) > disinfectants/sanitizers (0.64 h) > fabric softener concentrate (1.09 h) = aluminum wash (1.20 h) > 20% SDS (1.81 h) > liquid laundry detergents (3.48 h) > liquid dish detergents (4.16 h) = liquid fabric softeners (4.56 h) = liquid hand soaps (4.58 h) = shampoos (5.40 h) = hard surface cleaners (6.34 h) > powder automatic dish detergents (>16 h) = powder laundry detergents (>16 h). In addition to formulation effects, some seasonal effects were noted; particularly greater winter-time reactivity to 20% SDS and the hard surface cleaner and liquid laundry formulations. These results demonstrate the utility of this patch test method for the comparative skin irritation assessment of these different product types.

Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous exposure to a variety of irritants has been extensively studied in recent years. Nevertheless, knowledge of the induction of irritant dermatitis, especially by mild irritants at low doses and for a short duration of exposure, is still incomplete.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the irritant effects and barrier disruption properties of ascorbic acid (ASC), acetic acid (ACA) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), particularly in combination with an anionic detergent, sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS).

METHODS

In a tandem repeated irritation test, the irritants were applied for 30 min twice daily for 4 days to the skin of the mid-back of 19 healthy volunteers of both sexes. We used bioengineering techniques for measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin colour reflectance, as well as visual scoring.

RESULTS

Repeated application of ASC and ACA caused a moderate increase in TEWL and erythema. The sequential application of ASC or ACA and SLS enhanced these effects. NaOH induced a strong reaction when applied both occlusively and nonocclusively as well as in combination with SLS, with an early onset of the inflammatory signs, leading to discontinuation of the application on the third day in most of the test fields. Notably, the irritant effect of NaOH was not as marked when applied sequentially with SLS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that concurrent application of an anionic detergent and a mild acidic irritant can lead to disruption of the barrier function which, although not additive, is still considerable. The combined application of SLS and mild acids does not prevent SLS-induced irritation. Furthermore, we showed that NaOH in low concentrations may also act as a potent irritant but that its effect is not enhanced by SLS. The necessity of adequate skin protection and reduction of contact with substances that are potentially barrier disruptive and irritant, e.g. in the food industry, is emphasized, not only when handling detergents, but also when processing food products.

The MOAHLFA index of irritant sodium lauryl sulfate reactions: first results of a multicentre study on routine sodium lauryl sulfate patch testing

In a multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) 0.25% and 0.5% aq. has been added to routine allergen patch tests to assess its properties as a convenient diagnostic indicator of individual susceptibility to irritation at the time of patch testing. Previous studies indicated that irritant SLS reactivity may be related to individual factors such as age and sex. As these factors are, in turn, among the important predictors of contact allergy to many allergens, e.g. summarized in the 'MOAHLFA index', the impact of the MOAHLFA factors on irritant SLS patch test reactivity, and thus a potential for confounding, was assessed in the 5971 participating patients. As a result of 2 logistic regression analyses with an irritant reaction to 0.25% and 0.5% SLS, respectively, as outcome, male sex was identified as a relatively weak but significant risk factor (OR 1.38), while age 40 years or older was an even weaker risk factor (OR 1.22 and 1.15, respectively). Upon detailed analysis, no clear age gradient could, however, be identified. 1-day exposure time almost halved the odds of an irritant SLS reaction. In conclusion, this type of SLS patch test can be regarded as robust, indicating individual irritability relatively independent from the individual factors analysed here.

Effects of age and race on skin condition and bacterial counts on hands of neonatal ICU nurses

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between demographic factors such as age and race and skin condition and bacterial counts on hands of nurses.

METHODS

Nurses (n = 111) working in 1 of 2 neonatal ICUs in New York City were surveyed regarding reported hand care practices and demographics, the condition of their hands was assessed by a trained observer and by themselves using validated instruments, and a hand culture was obtained.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in any skin care practices by race, but nurses who wore powder-free gloves were significantly younger than those who did not (P =.004). There were no significant differences in bacterial counts on hands of black or white nurses (mean log colony-forming units 3.49 and 3.61 respectively, P =.63) and no significant correlation between age and microbial counts (r = 0.04, P =.72). In a logistic regression analysis, race, but not age, was a significant predictor of skin health. By both observer (P =.02) and self-assessment (P =.004) black nurses had healthier skin.

CONCLUSION

Physiochemical differences in skin associated with demographic factors such as age and race may be exacerbated among those in disciplines such as nursing, for whom the skin of the hands is continually stressed by occupational practices such as frequent hand hygiene. Such demographic factors need be considered when assessing skin condition and when advocating for appropriate strategies to maximize skin health. The recommendations of the new CDC Hand Hygiene Guideline for Healthcare Settings(23) regarding maintaining skin health and providing moisturizers and products that are milder to the skin are timely and should be followed.

Assessment of irritant skin reactions using electrical impedance--a comparison between 2 laboratories

To assess interlaboratory variability in the measurement of skin electrical impedance (IMP), we evaluated irritant reactions to sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) (2%) and nonanoic acid (NAA) (40%) in 2 laboratories. We studied the patch test responses in 40 healthy male and female volunteers between 20 and 30 years of age (20 in each laboratory) with an instrument for measuring IMP. 2 other bioengineering methods and visual scoring were also used to facilitate further illumination of any findings. A strict protocol including all details of the measurement procedure was carefully implemented in both laboratories. The skin reactions were evaluated at 23 h and at 3, 7 and 14 days after exposure. Our findings show that both irritants caused distinct dynamic responses detectable with the bioengineering techniques. Interestingly, the IMP baseline values varied between the 2 laboratories. Moreover, at early stages in the development of irritation (day 1), the irritants induced changes in IMP indices in the opposite direction, which accords with the concept of various IMP patterns of contact dermatitis caused by different irritants. Although the absolute values of IMP differed in both laboratories, the dynamic response patterns were the same.

Ethnicity as a possible endogenous factor in irritant contact dermatitis: comparing the irritant response among Caucasians, blacks, and Asians

Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a common dermatological diagnosis in which endogenous and exogenous factors have been implicated. This review explores ethnicity as a possible endogenous factor. While there is a clinical consensus that blacks are less reactive and Asians are more reactive than Caucasians, the data supporting this hypothesis rarely reaches statistical significance. The studies reviewed do not provide sufficient evidence to determine that race is a predisposing factor to the degree of irritation in ICD. We conclude that race could be a factor in ICD, which has practical consequences regarding topical product testing requirements, an ever-expanding global market, occupational risk assessment, and the clinical thinking about ICD. Pitfalls in defining differences are discussed.

Variability in responsiveness to irritants: thoughts on possible underlying mechanisms

Patch testing with chemical irritants almost always produces a striking variability in the intensity of reaction between individuals, even amongst normal, healthy subjects. Whilst there have been many attempts to define factors which predispose to heightened or, conversely, to diminished reactivity, the underlying cellular mechanisms responsible for the variability remain poorly understood. In this review, a number of possible explanations are proposed, with a particular emphasis on those which relate to the influence of pre-existing disease or to the genetic regulation of certain immunological and inflammatory processes.