Pouch vs. no pouch following total gastrectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review

Pouch Roux-en-Y vs No Pouch Roux-en-Y following total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis based on 12 studies

After a total resection of the stomach, the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract can be restored either by Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy with or without a pouch. There is still no consensus on the best reconstruction technique. The aim of this report was to derive a more precise estimation of Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy with a pouch compared with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy without a pouch. Studies were identified by PubMed and Embase searches, and the inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing reconstruction techniques between Roux-en-Y with and without a pouch. A total of 12 studies including 1,018 patients were included. The meta-analysis shows that pouch Roux-en-Y does not significantly increase total postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage or mortality. Importantly, there is no significant difference in 5-year survival rates between the two groups. Patients with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy complained significantly less of reflux symptoms and dumping syndrome, and had significantly less severe reflux esophagitis. Quality of life was significantly improved in patients with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy with a pouch compared with patients who received Roux-en-Y reconstruction without a pouch. The results indicate the need for Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy with a pouch is a gastric substitute after total gastrectomy by comparison with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy without a pouch.

Tissue engineering of the stomach

Tissue engineering combines engineering principles with the biological sciences to create functional replacement tissues. The underlying principle of tissue engineering is that isolated cells combined with biomaterials can form new tissues and organs in vitro and in vivo. This review focuses on stomach tissue engineering, which is a promising approach to the treatment of gastric cancer, the fourth most common malignancy in the world and the second-leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Although gastrectomy is a reliable intervention to achieve complete removal of cancer lesions, the limited capacity for food intake after resection results in lower quality of life for patients. To address this issue, we have developed a tissue-engineered stomach to increase the capacity for food intake by creating a new food reservoir. We have transplanted this neo-stomach as a substitute for the original native stomach in a rat model and confirmed functional adaptation. Furthermore, we have demonstrated the feasibility of transplanting a tissue-engineered gastric wall patch in a rat model to alleviate the complications after resection of a large area of the gastric wall. Although progress has been achieved, significant challenges remain to bring this approach to clinical practice. Here, we summarize our work and present the state of the art in stomach tissue engineering.

[Treatment of gastric cancer beyond current guideline: state of the art]

The majority of recommendations in the current S3 guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric carcinoma are based on good clinical practice and lack supporting randomized studies. With the development of endoscopic resection and multimodal treatment concepts, pretherapeutic tumor staging has gained in importance. However, the accuracy of present imaging modalities is still limited with a tendency towards overstaging of locally advanced tumors. Extended lymph node dissection cannot be recommended in cases with advanced lymph node involvement. In cardiac cancer retroperitoneal lymphatic spread to the left renal vein is an early event and should thus not be classified as stage IV disease. In cases of intra-abdominal gastrectomy a pouch reconstruction should be considered in cases with a good overall prognosis. Subgroup analyses indicate a differential therapeutic effect of the established perioperative chemotherapy depending on the location of the primary tumor. There is also good evidence for an additional beneficial effect of radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy.

Quality of care indicators for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Quality assurance is increasingly acknowledged as a crucial factor for the (surgical) treatment of gastric cancer. The purpose of the current study was to define a minimum set of evidence-based quality of care indicators for the surgical treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature published between January 1990 and May 2011 was performed, using search terms on gastric cancer, treatment, and quality of care. Studies were selected based on predefined selection criteria. Potential quality of care indicators were assessed based on their level of evidence and were grouped into structure, process, and outcome indicators.

RESULTS

A total of 173 articles were included in the current study. For structural measures, evidence was found for the inverse relationship between hospital volume and postoperative mortality as well as overall survival. Regarding process measures, the most common indicators concerned surgical technique, perioperative care, and multimodality treatment. The only outcome indicator with supporting evidence was a microscopically radical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although specific literature on quality of care indicators for the surgical treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer is limited, several quality of care indicators could be identified. These indicators can be used in clinical audits and other quality assurance programs.

Effective palliation and quality of life outcomes in studies of surgery for advanced, non-curative gastric cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Relief of symptoms should be the primary focus of palliative treatment as defined by the World Health Organization. Evaluating the effectiveness of palliative interventions should incorporate this goal and include quality of life (QOL) outcome assessments. A systematic review of the surgical gastric cancer literature was performed to summarize the effectiveness of palliative surgical interventions in addressing QOL.

METHODS

An electronic literature search of EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials was performed from January 1, 1985 to December 1, 2009. English language abstracts and articles were reviewed independently by two reviewers. A systematic approach to data abstraction and presentation was followed.

RESULTS

No articles were identified as reporting true QOL outcomes using reliable, validated QOL instruments in surgically managed, advanced gastric cancer patients. Nine articles were identified as reporting outcomes measuring effectiveness of palliation. Commonly reported pre-procedure symptoms were weight loss, abdominal pain, vomiting, obstruction, and bleeding. Time to oral intake was reported in 5 of 9 studies, ranging from a mean of 2.9 days (laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy) to 8 days (surgical bypass). Length of postoperative inpatient stay ranged from a mean of 7 days (gastrojejunostomy) to 28 days (surgical bypass). Other measures of effective palliation included measures of clinical success, hospital re-admission rates, and post-procedure analgesic intake.

CONCLUSION

A paucity of literature exists regarding the QOL of surgically managed gastric cancer patients. Prospectively designed studies using credible QOL measures are necessary to better inform the treatment decision-making process for these patients.

Surgical approaches to gastric cancer

While the incidence of gastric cancer has declined substantially, it remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Surgical resection offers the best chance for curative treatment. Despite numerous studies, surgical controversies persist including endoscopic resection, extent of gastric resection, degree of lymphadenectomy, and laparoscopic resection. Balancing the benefits with the risks of surgical morbidity and mortality is essential. This review examines these controversies and provides insight into the surgical management of gastric cancer.

Transthoracic resection versus non-transthoracic resection for gastroesophageal junction cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of transthoracic resection on long-term survival of patients with GEJ cancer and to compare the postoperative morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing transthoracic resection with those of patients who were not undergoing transthoracic resection.

METHOD

Searches of electronic databases identifying studies from Medline, Cochrane Library trials register, and WHO Trial Registration etc were performed. Outcome measures were survival, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and operation related events.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (including 5 RCTs and 7 non-RCTs) comprising 1105 patients were included in this meta-analysis, with 591 patients assigned treatment with transthoracic resection. Transthoracic resection did not increase the 5-y overall survival rate for RCTs and non-RCTs (HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.80- 1.29 and HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.70- 1.14, respectively). Stratified by the Siewert classification, our result showed no obvious differences were observed between the group with transthoracic resection and group without transthoracic resection (P>0.05). The postoperative morbidity (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.48- 1.00 and OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.25- 1.22) and mortality (RD = -0.03, 95% CI -0.06- 0.00 and RD = 0.00, 95% CI -0.05- 0.05) of RCTs and non-RCTs did not suggest any significant differences between the two groups. Hospital stay was long with thransthoracic resection (WMD = -5.80, 95% CI -10.38- -1.23) but did not seem to differ in number of harvested lymph nodes, operation time, blood loss, numbers of patients needing transfusion, and reoperation rate. The results of sensitivity analyses were similar to the primary analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences of survival rate and postoperative morbidity and mortality between transthoracic resection group and non-transthoracic resection group. Both surgical approaches are acceptable, and that one offers no clear advantage over the other. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously since the qualities of included studies were suboptimal.

Double tract reconstruction (DTR) - an alternative type of digestive tract reconstructive procedure after total gastrectomy - own experience

The only proven, effective therapy in case of the gastric cancers is surgery.

THE AIM OF THE STUDY

The most common procedure which is made in such a situation is total resection of the stomach. In our publication we would like to present and to recommend a very rare made type of the reconstructive procedures after total gastrectomy, which is called "double tract reconstruction" (DTR). This type of reconstruction is occasionally made mainly in Japan.Material and methods. Double tract reconstruction has been made in 2nd Department of General and Gastroenterological Surgery since 2000. Till today 75 patients were treated with this method.

RESULTS

The frequency of complications after double tract reconstruction was occasional, and there were no differences between this procedure and Roux-en-Y method of the reconstruction. There were no differences in the time of the operation between this two methods. The most important advantage of this method is that duodenal passage is extant. Because of that the endoscopic examination of papilla Vateri can be made.

CONCLUSIONS

We would like to recommend this method as an alternative to Roux-en-Y procedure because of its simplicity and safeness.

Gastric adenocarcinoma surgery and adjuvant therapy

Gastric adenocarcinoma is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of therapy, offering the only chance for complete cure. Resection is based on the principles of obtaining adequate margins, with the extent of lymphadenectomy remaining controversial. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies are used to reduce local recurrence and improve long-term survival. This article reviews the literature and provides a summary of surgical management options and neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Postgastrectomy syndromes

The first postgastrectomy syndrome was noted not long after the first gastrectomy was performed. The indications for gastric resection have changed dramatically over the past 4 decades, and the overall incidence of gastric resection has decreased. This article focuses on the small proportion of patients with severe, debilitating symptoms; these symptoms can challenge the acumen of the surgeon who is providing the patient's long-term follow-up and care. The article does not deal with the sequelae of bariatric surgery.

Postoperative long-term evaluation of interposition reconstruction compared with Roux-en-Y after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer: prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The postoperative clinical superiority of the interposition of jejunum reconstruction (INT) to Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY) after total gastrectomy has not been clarified. Postoperative quality of life (QOL) was evaluated between the 2 methods by a multi-institutional prospective randomized trial.

METHODS

A total of 103 patients with gastric cancer were prospectively randomly divided into groups for RY (n = 51) or INT reconstruction (n = 52) after total gastrectomy. They were stratified by sex, age, institute, histology, and degree of lymph node dissection. Postoperatively, body mass index (BMI) and nutritional conditions were measured serially, and QOL and postoperative squalor scores were evaluated at 3, 12, and 60 months and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

After removing patients who did not complete the follow-up survey or censured cases, 24 patients in the RY group and 18 patients in the INT group were clinically available and their postoperative status was assessed. QOL scores were increased and complication scores were improved in the postoperative periods (P < .01). Postoperative BMI significantly deteriorated compared with preoperative BMI in each group. The postoperative QOL and complication scores at 60 months after surgery were significantly better than those at 3 months after surgery in each group (P < .01). However, there was no significant difference of QOL scores and postoperative complication scores between the 2 reconstruction groups. The nutritional condition in the INT group was nearly the same as that in the RY group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our patient sample was small and patients who did not complete the follow-up survey were present, we could not identify any clinical difference between INT and RY after total gastrectomy 60 months after surgery. The safer and simpler RY method may be a more suitable reconstruction method than INT after total gastrectomy.

Optimal size of jejunal pouch as a reservoir after total gastrectomy: a single-center prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

In order to improve a patient's quality of life after total gastrectomy, jejunal pouch reconstruction has been employed. However, little information exists regarding the optimal size of the jejunal pouch after total gastrectomy.

METHODS

The study was designed as a single-center randomized trial in which the results of double-tract reconstruction with pouches of two different sizes were compared, i.e., short and long pouch double tract (SPDT and LPDT, respectively). We conducted a clinical assessment with standard questionnaire after surgery. The amount of residual food in the jejunal pouch was determined by endoscopy.

RESULTS

No demographic differences were noted between the two groups. The eating capacity per meal was higher in the SPDT group than in the LPDT group. The postoperative weight loss 24 months after surgery was lower in SPDT group than that in the LPDT group. Although the incidence of early dumping symptoms was higher in the SPDT group, no difference was noted in the other postprandial abdominal symptoms between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the optimal pouch should be relatively short, as a short pouch improves the eating capacity per meal and the weight loss ratio to the preoperative value.

[Quality of life of patients with cancer of the oesophagus and stomach]

The study of the health related quality of life in patients with digestive tract cancer, and particularly in those with tumours of the oesophagus and stomach, provides useful information for selecting the most suitable therapeutic option. It may also be used to predict the impact of the disease and its possible treatments on the physical, emotional and social condition of the patient. Various sensitive and reliable tools have been developed over the past decades that are capable of measuring the quality of life of patients; the use of questionnaires has made it easier to exchange information between the patient and the doctor. The pre- and post-operative variations in the quality of life in patients with oesophageal-gastric cancer are of prognostic value on the outcome of the disease. For all these reasons, the health related quality of life is currently considered, along with disease free survival and absence of recurrences, one of the most important parameters in order to assess the impact on the patients of a particular oncological treatment. The aim of this article is to review the role of the health related quality of life assessment, as well as the various tools which are available to measure it in patients with oesophageal-gastric cancer.

Gastrectomy with isoperistaltic jejunal parallel pouch in a 15-year-old adolescent boy with gastric adenocarcinoma and autosomal recessive agammaglobulinemia

A 15-year-old adolescent boy with autosomal recessive agammaglobulinemia underwent endoscopy because of unexplained growth failure and malnutrition. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed antropyloric stenosis, and a biopsy showed an invasive gastric adenocarcinoma. Chronic atrophic corpus gastritis type A and Helicobacter pylori were also identified. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the stenosis resulting from a semicircular intramural tumor without obvious local or distant metastatic spread. Gastrectomy with an extended lymphadenectomy was performed. Esophagoduodenal continuity was restored by an interposed jejunal parallel pouch developed from the first jejunal loop. Oral feeding was supplemented by parenteral nutrition via a Broviac catheter, and the patient is well 4 months later. Several cases of gastric cancer have been reported in children with hereditary agammaglobulinemia. Thus, endoscopy is mandatory in such patients with gastrointestinal symptoms to identify and treat tumors before metastasis occurs. Total gastrectomy, extended lymphadenectomy, and reconstruction using a jejunal reservoir with maintenance of duodenal continuity should be considered.

Distal pouch reconstruction with transverse jejunoplasty after experimental gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Various reconstruction methods with or without reservoir formation after total gastrectomy have been established. Transverse intestinoplasty has benefits as a functional peristalsis modification in rectal resections. In this study, we evaluate a distal pouch combined with a transverse jejunoplasty compared to standard Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

METHODS

Total gastrectomy was performed on 23 pigs randomly assigned to 3 reconstruction groups-group 1 (n = 7): esophagojejunostomy without a pouch, group 2 (n = 8): esophagojejunostomy with a distal pouch, and group 3 (n = 8): distal pouch with a transverse jejunoplasty. Seven days postoperatively, weight was measured, and X-ray examinations were conducted for 1 h after oral contrast medium application. Blood glucose levels after oral glucose intake and the volume of the pouch loop were evaluated.

RESULTS

Upper jejunal passage was delayed and the mean volume of the jejunal loop increased by pouch formation compared to controls (p < 0.05). Body weight was the best for the pouch group with jejunoplasty (-1.9 ± 0.8% vs. pouch alone -3.3 ± 2.4% vs. no pouch -7.5 ± 2.1%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The distal jejunal pouch after total gastrectomy offers advantages with respect to bowel passage and postoperative nutrition status compared to standard Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The combination of a distal pouch and transverse jejunoplasty may provide additional functional benefits.

Complicações pós-operatórias após gastrectomia total no câncer gástrico: análise de 300 doentes

RACIONAL: A gastrectomia total é considerada um procedimento de alto nível de complexidade, apresenta taxas de complicações elevadas, tanto locais como gerais, pois os doentes na sua maioria estão com as condições clínicas e nutricionais comprometidas pela doença. OBJETIVOS: analisar os resultados imediatos e complicações da gastrectomia total no período de 1972 a 2007. MÉTODOS: Foram revisados os prontuários médicos de 300 doentes portadores de adenocarcinoma gástrico, subdivididos em dois períodos: 1972 a 1992 - compreendendo 108 doentes (36%) e 1993 a 2007 - compreendendo 192 doentes (64%). Eram 67,3% do sexo masculinos, 70,7% brancos e com faixa etária variando de 25 a 86 anos (média de 63,4 anos). As lesões estavam localizadas em cárdia - 40 casos (13,3%); fundo gástrico - 83 casos (27,6%); corpo gástrico - 77 casos (25,6%); linite plástica - 45 casos (15%); côto gástrico - 33 casos (11%) e antro/corpo gástrico - 22 casos (7,3%). A gastrectomia total ampliada com linfadenectomia até nível D2 foi realizada em 246 casos (82%). RESULTADOS: A técnica de reconstrução mais utilizada foi a anastomose esôfago-jejunal término-lateral em Y-Roux em 257 doentes (86,7%). As complicações gerais no período de 1972-92 totalizaram 47 casos (43,5%), compreendendo principalmente as respiratórias (28 casos - 25,9%) e as urinárias (10 casos - 9,2%). No período 1993-2007 totalizaram 48 casos (25%), principalmente complicações respiratórias (27 casos - 14%), seguidas também das urinárias (12 casos - 6,2%). No período de 1972-92 estas complicações locais totalizaram 45 casos (30,8%) e no período de 1993-2007 atingiram 28 casos (14,5%), sendo as fistulas digestivas as mais frequentes. A mortalidade operatória até o 30º dia foi de 18 casos (6%), sendo que no período de 1972-92 totalizou 12 casos (11,1%) e no período de 1993-2007 foi de 7 casos (3,6%). CONCLUSÕES: A gastrectomia total é um procedimento que requer experiência do cirurgião, de sua equipe, empregando técnica cirúrgica aprimorada para minimizar as complicações pós-operatórias. As complicações pós-operatórias requerem cuidados no controle das infecções, das vias aéreas e cuidados nutricionais, diminuindo a mortalidade, aumentando a sobrevida e contribuindo para a qualidade de vida do doente.

A new pouch reconstruction method after total gastrectomy (pouch-double tract method) improved the postoperative quality of life of patients with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Many reconstruction methods after total gastrectomy (TG) lead patients to dumping syndrome, reflux esophagitis, and poor postoperative quality of life (QOL). To improve patients' postoperative QOL after TG, we introduce a new reconstruction method named "pouch-double tract" (PDT).

METHODS

A prospective randomized study was performed between 2005 and 2007 in 29 patients who were diagnosed as stage I or II gastric cancers preoperatively. Patients were followed until the end of 2009. Conventional Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY) was performed in 15 patients, and PDT was used in 14 patients. Postoperative patients' nutritional assessments and patients' QOL were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

PDT did not increase morbidity or mortality compared with RY. Patients in the PDT group did not complain of dumping and showed better postoperative food intake. Body weight recovered better in PDT than in RY.

CONCLUSION

PDT is safe and associated with better nutritional status compared with the RY.

[Anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract]

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leaks are the major postoperative complications mainly due to technical difficulties. The aim was to review anastomotic techniques and risk factors for leak development.

METHODS

A Pubmed search was performed using the terms esophagogastric/esophagojejunal anastomosis, gastrojejunostomy, gastric bypass, esophagectomy, anastomotic leak/risk factors, gastrectomy, TEA, fluid management, early enteral feeding and reinforcement. English and German literature sources were included with the accent on recent prospective randomized controlled trials (pRCT) with high numbers of cases as well as meta-analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

There is not enough evidence to recommend either hand sewn or mechanical anastomoses. Surgical skills and routine as well as precise work are necessary to reduce complications. Although stapling leads to uniformity of anastomoses it cannot compensate for surgical deficits.