A scoping review of caregiver burden during allogeneic HSCT: lessons learned and future directions

A randomized control trial of stress management for caregivers of stem cell transplant patients: Effect on patient quality of life and caregiver distress

BACKGROUND

Psychological interventions reduce caregiver distress (CG-distress). Less distress in caregivers may contribute to improved patient quality of life (QoL), but empirical evidence is lacking. Will a caregiver stress management intervention improve patient QoL?

METHODS

In this replication study, we randomized 155 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (Allo-HSCT) patients and caregivers to PsychoEducation, Paced Respiration, and Relaxation (PEPRR) or enhanced treatment as usual (eTAU). We provided PEPRR over 3 months following transplant. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) evaluated patient QoL, and CG-distress was based on depressive, anxious, and stress symptoms. Hierarchical linear models tested intervention, time, and interactions as fixed effects with participant as random effects.

RESULTS

Patients whose caregivers received PEPRR did not differ on FACT-BMT between baseline and 6 months (mean = +3.74; 95% CI, -3.54 to 11.02) compared with patients of caregivers in eTAU (mean = +3.16; 95% CI, -2.88 to 9.20) even though CG-distress was decreased by PEPRR (mean = -0.23; 95% CI, -0.448 to -0.010) compared with those receiving eTAU (mean = +0.27; 95% CI, 0.033-0.504) at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PEPRR reduced CG-distress without affecting their patient's FACT-BMT score. The FACT-BMT may not have distinguished unique psychological changes associated with their caregiver receiving PEPRR.

Quality of Life of Caregivers of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients

Caregivers are critical to recipient recovery after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT); however, little is known about their long-term health and quality of life (QoL). In this study we surveyed 4446 caregiver-recipient pairs in the post-HCT period to describe their QoL and its determinants. In total, 849 caregiver-recipient pairs at a median of 6 years after autologous or allogeneic HCT responded. Among 849 responding caregivers at a median of 6 years post-HCT, 67% of caregivers were women and 68% indicated they were still providing care to the recipient. Mean and median QoL measures of caregivers were at or above general population norms; however, approximately 20% of caregivers reported poor QoL relative to general population norms. Multivariate analysis revealed that caregiver characteristics, including age, gender, and educational attainment, were important determinants of caregiver QoL. Additional determinants of caregiver QoL included recipient QoL, relapse after autologous HCT, and ongoing use of immunosuppression after allogeneic HCT. Additionally, the prevalence of depression and sleep disorders appear to be higher in caregivers than in the general population. We have identified a population of caregivers who may benefit from interventions aimed at improving QoL and health outcomes. HCT clinical practice should also consider caregiver well-being.

Insomnia among Cancer Caregivers: A Proposal for Tailored Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Caregivers are relatives, friends, or partners who have a significant relationship with and provide assistance (i.e., physical, emotional) to a patient with often life-threatening, serious illnesses. Between 40 and 76 percent of caregivers for people with cancer experience sleep disturbance. This is thought to be due, in part, to the unique responsibilities, stressors, and compensatory behaviors endemic to caregiving that serve as precipitating and perpetuating factors of insomnia. Sleep disturbances are associated with significant alterations in one's mental and physical health. Once chronic, insomnia does not remit naturally. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is well-suited to address the multifaceted contributing factors unique to caregivers' sleep disturbance, yet only one intervention has tested a CBT-I informed intervention among cancer caregivers. Toward the goal of developing effective, tailored treatments for insomnia in caregivers, we address the distinct presentation of insomnia among cancer caregivers and describe key modifications to standard CBT-I that address these specific needs and enhance sensitivity and feasibility, modeled in a demonstrative case vignette. Future research must seek to provide a wide range of effective treatment options for this population, including internet-based, dyadic, and alternative integrative medicine treatments. Applicability of key modifications for caregivers of patients with other chronic illnesses is discussed. Establishing empirically-supported interventions for insomnia among cancer caregivers has the potential to enhance their quality of life and care provided, lead to improved bereavement outcomes, and attenuate the notable mental and physical health disparities present in this vulnerable population.

Patient and Caregiver Determinants of Patient Quality of Life and Caregiver Strain in Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy

BACKGROUND

Although current guidelines emphasize the importance of social support to the success of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, few studies examine the influence of the caregiver on patient outcomes or quantify the impact of LVAD caregiving on caregiver outcomes. The purpose of this analysis was to identify patient and caregiver determinants of patient quality of life (QOL) and caregiver strain in response to LVAD therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data on patients receiving LVAD therapy and their caregivers (n=50 dyads) were prospectively collected pre-implantation and 1, 3, and 6 months post-implantation. Growth curve modeling was used to describe change in patient QOL (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) and caregiver strain (Multidimensional Caregiver Strain Index). Patient QOL improved most in the first month (β=23.22±3.76, P<0.001), followed by gradual gains over 6 months (β=1.90±0.64, P<0.01). Caregivers experienced worsening of strain in the first month (β=4.30±1.42, P<0.01), followed by gradual resolution to pre-implantation levels by 6 months (β=-0.71±0.23, P<0.01). Worse pre-implantation patient symptoms were associated with greater improvement in patient QOL (β=0.53±0.19, P<0.01) but worsening caregiver strain (β=0.15±0.07, P=0.04). Better relationship quality was associated with greater improvement in patient QOL (β=14.39±5.85, P=0.01) and less pre-implantation caregiver strain (β=-9.31±2.28, P<0.001). Nonspousal caregivers experienced less pre-implantation strain (β=-8.60±3.10, P=0.01), and patients with nonspousal caregivers had less improvement in QOL (β=-3.70±1.62, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of patient and caregiver characteristics predicts patient and caregiver response to LVAD therapy. Including caregiver factors in future studies may be helpful in developing interventions that improve patient and caregiver outcomes, together.

National Institutes of Health Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Late Effects Initiative: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Working Group Report

In 2015, the National Institutes of Health convened six working groups to address the research needs and best practices for late effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survivors. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Working Group, charged with summarizing the HRQOL evidence base, used a scoping review approach to efficiently survey the large body of literature in adult and pediatric HCT survivors over 1 year after transplantation. The goals of this paper are to (1) summarize the current literature describing patient-centered outcomes in survivors, including the various dimensions of health-related quality of life affected by HCT, and describe interventions tested to improve these outcomes; (2) highlight areas with sufficient evidence allowing for integration into standard practice; (3) address methodological issues that restrict progress in this field; (4) identify major gaps to guide future research; and (5) specify priority research recommendations. Patient-centered outcomes were summarized within physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains, as well as for adherence to treatment, and health behaviors. Interventions to improve outcomes were evaluated for evidence of efficacy, although few interventions have been tested in long-term HCT survivors. Methodologic issues defined included lack of consistency in the selection of patient-centered outcome measures, along with the absence of a standard for timing, frequency, and mode of administration. Recommendations for HCT survivorship care included integration of annual screening of patient-centered outcomes, use of evidence-based practice guidelines, and provision of treatment summaries and survivorship care plans after HCT. Three priority research recommendations included the following: (1) design and test risk-targeted interventions with dose-intensity modulation matching the needs of HCT survivors with priority domains, including sexual dysfunction, fatigue, sleep disruption, nonadherence to medications and recommended health care, health behaviors including physical inactivity and healthy eating, and psychological dysfunction, with particular consideration of novel technologies to reach HCT survivors distant from their transplantation centers; (2) design a consensus-based methodologic framework for outcomes evaluation; and (3) evaluate and compare existing practices for integrating patient-centered outcome screening and interventions across HCT survivorship programs.