CALR vs JAK2 vs MPL-mutated or triple-negative myelofibrosis: clinical, cytogenetic and molecular comparisons

Improving allogeneic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis

In this review, we will outline dimensions in which outcome of patients with myelofibrosis undergoing curative treatment can be optimized: patient selection, transplant procedure, and posttransplant prevention or treatment of relapse. For patient selection, fortunately, as with several other hematologic malignancies, the management of patients with myelofibrosis has very much entered the molecular era, with the establishment of several driver and nondriver mutations, allowing more individualized selection for treatment. For the transplant procedure itself, different conditioning intensities do not seem to play a distinctive role with regards to outcome posttransplant but still need to be compared in the molecular era. While many patients nowadays may receive ruxolitinib before transplant, recent studies may facilitate fine-tuning and integration of ruxolitinib into the transplant algorithm. The role of novel inhibitors for the transplant setting remains unclear. For the posttransplant phase, evidence remains scarce, with experiences of donor-lymphocyte infusions for relapse management but more efforts are needed in understanding relapse and identifying and treating patients at high risk for relapse.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Novel Therapies in Development for Myelofibrosis

Myeloproliferative neoplasms research has entered a dynamic and exciting era as we witness exponential growth of novel agents in advanced/early phase clinical trials for myelofibrosis (MF). Building on the success and pivotal role of ruxolitinib, many novel agents, spanning a wide range of mechanisms/targets (epigenetic regulation, apoptotic/intracellular signaling pathways, telomerase, bone marrow fibrosis) are in clinical development; several are studied in registrational trials and hold great potential to expand the therapeutic arsenal/shift the treatment paradigm if regulatory approval is granted. Insight into MF pathogenesis and its molecular underpinnings, preclinical studies demonstrating synergism of ruxolitinib with investigational agents, urgent unmet clinical needs (cytopenias, loss of response to JAK inhibitors); and progressive disease fueled the rapid rise of innovative therapeutics. New strategies include pairing ruxolitinib with erythroid maturation agents to manage anemia (luspatercept), designing rational combinations with ruxolitinib to boost responses in both the frontline and suboptimal response settings (pelabresib, navitoclax, parsaclisib), treatment with non-JAK inhibitor monotherapy in the second-line setting (navtemadlin, imetelstat), novel JAK inhibitors tailored to subgroups with challenging unmet needs (momelotinib and pacritinib for anemia and thrombocytopenia, respectively); and agents potentially enhancing longevity (imetelstat). Beyond typical endpoints evaluated in MF clinical trials (spleen volume reduction ≥ 35%, total symptom score reduction ≥ 50%) thus far, emerging endpoints include overall survival, progression-free survival, transfusion independence, anemia benefits, bone marrow fibrosis and driver mutation allele burden reduction. Novel biomarkers and additional clinical features are being sought to assess new agents and tailor emerging therapies to appropriate patients. New strategies are needed to optimize the design of clinical trials comparing novel combinations to standard agent monotherapy.

Myelofibrosis: Genetic Characteristics and the Emerging Therapeutic Landscape

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is one of three myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) that are morphologically and molecularly inter-related, the other two being polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). MPNs are characterized by JAK-STAT-activating JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations that give rise to stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation, which is prone to leukemic and, in case of PV and ET, fibrotic transformation. Abnormal megakaryocyte proliferation is accompanied by bone marrow fibrosis and characterizes PMF, while the clinical phenotype is pathogenetically linked to ineffective hematopoiesis and aberrant cytokine expression. Among MPN-associated driver mutations, type 1-like CALR mutation has been associated with favorable prognosis in PMF, while ASXL1, SRSF2, U2AF1-Q157, EZH2, CBL, and K/NRAS mutations have been shown to be prognostically detrimental. Such information has enabled development of exclusively genetic (GIPSS) and clinically integrated (MIPSSv2) prognostic models that facilitate individualized treatment decisions. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only treatment modality in MF with the potential to prolong survival, whereas drug therapy, including JAK2 inhibitors, is directed mostly at the inflammatory component of the disease and is therefore palliative in nature. Similarly, disease-modifying activity remains elusive for currently available investigational drugs, while their additional value in symptom management awaits controlled confirmation. There is a need for genetic characterization of clinical observations followed by in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies that will hopefully identify therapies that target the malignant clone in MF to improve patient outcomes.

Novel treatments for myelofibrosis: beyond JAK inhibitors

Myelofibrosis is a chronic hematologic malignancy characterized by constitutional symptoms, bone marrow fibrosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis resulting in splenomegaly and a propensity toward leukemic progression. Given the central role of the JAK-STAT pathway in the pathobiology of myelofibrosis, JAK inhibitors are the mainstay of current pharmacologic management. Although these therapies have produced meaningful improvements in splenomegaly and symptom burden, JAK inhibitors do not significantly impact disease progression. In addition, many patients are ineligible because of disease-related cytopenias, which are exacerbated by JAK inhibitors. Therefore, there is a continued effort to identify targets outside the JAK-STAT pathway. In this review, we discuss novel therapies in development for myelofibrosis. We focus on the preclinical rationale, efficacy and safety data for non-JAK inhibitor therapies that have published or presented clinical data. Specifically, we discuss agents that target epigenetic modification (pelabresib, bomedemstat), apoptosis (navitoclax, navtemdalin), signaling pathways (parsaclisib), bone marrow fibrosis (AVID200, PRM-151), in addition to other targets including telomerase (imetelstat), selective inhibitor of nuclear transport (selinexor), CD123 (tagraxofusp) and erythroid maturation (luspatercept). We end by providing commentary on the ongoing and future therapeutic development in myelofibrosis.

Coexistence of Trisomy 8 and 13 in a Newly Diagnosed Patient With Diffuse Large B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Secondary to Primary Myelofibrosis

Concomitant diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and acute myeloid leukemia secondary to chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) is rarely reported. Patients with MPNs may have a second neoplasm, and the risk of lymphoid line neoplasms is 2.5-3.5 times for lymphoid line neoplasms. The explanation for this association is the genetic instability of hematopoietic progenitors in MPNs. An 80-year-old Caucasian man, with many comorbidities, presents for physical asthenia, sweating. The right inguinal adenopathy was known one month before the examination. The patient was diagnosed concomitantly with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) secondary to primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and presented trisomy 8, trisomy 13, and triple-negative PMF status. The patient initially received two well-tolerated R mini CHOP series. This type of treatment was selected to treat DLBCL for one unfit patient for intensive chemotherapy due to his age and comorbidities. R mini CHOP administration was followed by severe aplasia that lasted approximately two weeks followed by severe thrombocytosis that reached 4000 x109/L, and Thromboreductin recommendation was mandatory. The result of the treatment was a partial response but with severe adverse events like neutropenia G4, due to the delay of the treatment the patient lost the response. It was mandatory to select another treatment line and the chosen was venetoclax; it was selected for the simultaneous treatment of DLBCL and the underlying AML. It was obtained a significant reduction in the size of the inguinal lymph node block in two weeks of treatment. Severe neutropenia was diagnosed and complicated with sepsis. The evolution is unfavorable with the installation of multiple organ dysfunction. The presence of a complex karyotype (trisomy 8, trisomy 13) in a patient with myeloid metaplasia with triple-negative PMF was associated with blast transformation and severe thrombocytosis. The patient was diagnosed concomitantly with DLBCL, making the therapeutic decision difficult. Venetoclax has been shown to be useful in the treatment of DLBCL but has been associated with severe neutropenia, which has led to infectious complications.

A Prognostic Model to Predict Survival After 6 Months of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Myelofibrosis

RUX dose, spleen response, and transfusion requirement in the first 6 months of RUX treatment predict overall survival in MF.

The RR6 model overcomes conventional risk stratification in RUX-treated MF.

Ruxolitinib (RUX) is extensively used in myelofibrosis (MF). Despite its early efficacy, most patients lose response over time and, after discontinuation, have a worse overall survival (OS). Currently, response criteria able to predict OS in RUX-treated patients are lacking, leading to uncertainty regarding the switch to second-line treatments. In this study, we investigated predictors of survival collected after 6 months of RUX in 209 MF patients participating in the real-world ambispective observational RUXOREL-MF study (NCT03959371). Multivariable analysis identified the following risk factors: (1) RUX dose <20 mg twice daily at baseline, months 3 and 6 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.00; P = .03), (2) palpable spleen length reduction from baseline ≤30% at months 3 and 6 (HR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.40-3.65; P = .0009), (3) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion need at months 3 and/or 6 (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.95-2.88; P = .07), and (4) RBC transfusion need at all time points (ie, baseline and months 3 and 6; HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.19-4.54; P = .02). Hence, we developed a prognostic model, named Response to Ruxolitinib After 6 Months (RR6), dissecting 3 risk categories: low (median OS, not reached), intermediate (median OS, 61 months; 95% CI, 43-80), and high (median OS, 33 months; 95% CI, 21-50). The RR6 model was validated and confirmed in an external cohort comprised of 40 MF patients. In conclusion, the RR6 prognostic model allows for the early identification of RUX-treated MF patients with impaired survival who might benefit from a prompt treatment shift.

Updated recommendations on the use of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Myelofibrosis is a rare bone marrow disorder associated with a high symptom burden, poor prognosis, and shortened survival. While allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis, the only approved and reimbursed pharmacotherapy for non-HSCT candidates in Belgium is ruxolitinib.

METHODS

These updated recommendations are based on a consensus reached during two meetings and provide guidance for ruxolitinib administration in myelofibrosis patients considering the particularities of Belgian reimbursement criteria.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In Belgium, ruxolitinib is indicated and reimbursed for transplant-ineligible myelofibrosis patients from intermediate-2- and high-risk groups and from the intermediate-1-risk group with splenomegaly. Our recommendation is to also make ruxolitinib available in the pre-transplant setting for myelofibrosis patients with splenomegaly or heavy symptom burden. Before ruxolitinib initiation, complete blood cell counts are recommended, and the decision on the optimal dosage should be based on platelet count and clinical parameters. In anemic patients, we recommend starting doses of ruxolitinib of 10 mg twice daily for 12 weeks and we propose the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with endogenous erythropoietin levels ≤500 mU/mL. Increased vigilance for opportunistic infections and second primary malignancies is needed in ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis patients. Ruxolitinib treatment should be continued as long as there is clinical benefit (reduced splenomegaly or symptoms), and we recommend progressive dose tapering when stopping ruxolitinib.

CONCLUSION

Based on new data and clinical experience, the panel of experts discussed ruxolitinib treatment in Belgian myelofibrosis patients with a focus on dose optimization/monitoring, adverse events, and interruption/rechallenge management.

Novel therapeutics and targets in myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal proliferation of myeloid cells, bone marrow fibrosis and cytopenias, extramedullary hematopoiesis and hepatosplenomegaly, increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and systemic symptoms. Patients with MF also have a propensity toward leukemic transformation. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHCT) is the only curative therapy for patients with MF; however, transplant-related morbidity and mortality precludes this option for the majority of patients. In the last decade, two targeted therapies have been approved for the treatment of MF, both JAK2 inhibitors, ruxolitinib and fedratinib. Despite the clinical efficacy of these two compounds in terms of splenomegaly and symptom burden reduction, there remain many areas of unmet need in the treatment of myelofibrosis. In this review, we discuss the limitations of currently approved treatment options and novel therapeutic targets with drug candidates in late-stage (phase II or III) clinical development for the treatment of MF. We delve into the mechanism of action and scientific rational of each candidate agent as well as the available clinical data, and ongoing trials that could lead to the approval of some of these novel therapies.

Aberrant expression of SPAG6 may affect the disease phenotype and serve as a tumor biomarker in BCR/ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Sperm-associated antigen 6 (SPAG6) is a newly identified cancer-testis antigen that has been revealed to contribute to the occurrence and development of various types of human cancer, such as ovarian, bladder, breast and lung cancer. However, to the best of our knowledge, the expression levels of SPAG6 in breakpoint cluster region (BCR)/ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have not been investigated previously. Using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and different tissue staining techniques, the present study revealed that SPAG6 was expressed by MPN cells, both at the mRNA and protein levels, and that nucleated erythroid precursors and megakaryocytes expressed the highest levels of SPAG6. In addition, SPAG6, which is known as a microtubule-associated protein, was found to exhibit nucleic, cytoplasmic or both cytoplasmic and nucleic subcellular localization patterns within the same patient or cell type; however, it did not always co-localize with β-tubulin. Furthermore, SPAG6 expression was revealed to be associated with fewer splenomegaly [P=0.015 for polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET); and P=0.012 for primary myelofibrosis (PMF)] and myelofibrosis events (P=0.014 for PV and ET; and P=0.004 for PMF). In patients with PMF, upregulated expression levels of SPAG6 were also found to be associated with lower white blood cell counts (P=0.042) and lactate dehydrogenase levels (P=0.012), and higher hemoglobin levels (P=0.031) and platelet counts (P=0.025). In addition, the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that SPAG6 may be a potential biomarker for distinguishing MPN cases from healthy individuals. In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report that aberrant SPAG6 expression may affect the disease phenotype and serve as a tumor biomarker in BCR/ABL1-negative MPNs.

Novel strategies for challenging scenarios encountered in managing myelofibrosis

Given its rarity, multi-faceted clinical presentation and the relative paucity of approved therapies, the management of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis (MF) can be challenging. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, the only approved agents at present, have brought many clinical benefits to patients, with prolongation of survival also demonstrated for ruxolitinib. However, these agents have clear limitations. Optimal management of anemia in MF remains a major unmet need. Neither ruxolitinib nor fedratinib is recommended for use in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, i.e. platelets <50 × 10⁹/L, who have a particularly poor prognosis. The search for the optimal partner for JAK inhibitors to address some of the shortcomings of these agents (e.g. limited ability to improve bone marrow fibrosis, cytopenias and induce molecular responses) and achieve meaningful 'disease modification' continues. This has led to the development of a number of rational, preclinically synergistic combinations for use either upfront or in the setting of sub-optimal response to JAK inhibition. Finally, the outlook for patients whose disease progresses on JAK inhibitor therapy continues to be grim, and agents with alternative mechanisms of action may be needed in this setting. In this article, we use a case-based approach to illustrate challenges commonly encountered in clinical practice and our management of the same. Fortunately, there has been enormous growth in drug development efforts in the MF space in the last few years, some of which appear poised to bear fruit in the very near future.

Rebound of platelet count in a patient with type 2 calreticulin-mutant essential thrombocythemia in the postpartum period: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is an uncommon myeloproliferative neoplasm. It is more common in females; 20% of them are below 40 years old. The optimal management of ET during pregnancy and postpartum periods is still not well established.

PATIENT CONCERN

We report a case of a young lady with type 2 calreticulin-mutant ET who developed a marked rebound in her platelet count (reaching 2030 × 103/μL) 2 weeks after premature delivery of her baby (24th week of gestation). She was on Pegylated Interferon alfa 2-a during pregnancy (her platelet was around 500 × 103/μL during the second trimester), but she had stopped it on her own from the 20th week of gestation.

DIAGNOSIS

Postpartum rebound of platelet count due to medication non-compliance.

INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME

We resumed her regular Pegylated Interferon, and subsequently, her platelet count reduced dramatically within 4 weeks to an acceptable level (684 × 103 /μL).

CONCLUSION

The guideline is still not well-established regarding the optimal approach for postpartum rebound of platelet count in patients with ET. It is still unclear if the platelet count will fall spontaneously without intervention after the rebound phase. Further research is required to establish the optimal management of ET during the postpartum phase. This case emphasizes the importance of platelet count follow-up during the postpartum period and outlines our management approach in such cases.

Progression in Ph-Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: An Overview on Pathologic Issues and Molecular Determinants

Progression in Ph-chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) develops with variable incidence and time sequence in essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and primary myelofibrosis. These diseases show different clinic-pathologic features and outcomes despite sharing deregulated JAK/STAT signaling due to mutations in either the Janus kinase 2 or myeloproliferative leukemia or CALReticulin genes, which are the primary drivers of the diseases, as well as defined diagnostic criteria and biomarkers in most cases. Progression is defined by the development or worsening of marrow fibrosis or the progressive increase in the marrow blast percentage. Progression is often related to additional genetic aberrations, although some can already be detected during the chronic phase. Detailed scoring systems for clinical usage that are mostly applied in patients with primary myelofibrosis have been defined, and the most recent ones include cytogenetic and molecular parameters with prognostic significance. Additional different clinic-pathologic changes have been reported that may occur during the course of the disease and that are, at present, classified as WHO-defined types of progression, although they likely represent such an event. The present review is meant to provide an updated overview on progression in Ph-chromosome-negative MPN, with a major focus on the pathologic side.

Progression in Ph-Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: An Overview on Pathologic Issues and Molecular Determinants

Progression in Ph-chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) develops with variable incidence and time sequence in essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and primary myelofibrosis. These diseases show different clinic-pathologic features and outcomes despite sharing deregulated JAK/STAT signaling due to mutations in either the Janus kinase 2 or myeloproliferative leukemia or CALReticulin genes, which are the primary drivers of the diseases, as well as defined diagnostic criteria and biomarkers in most cases. Progression is defined by the development or worsening of marrow fibrosis or the progressive increase in the marrow blast percentage. Progression is often related to additional genetic aberrations, although some can already be detected during the chronic phase. Detailed scoring systems for clinical usage that are mostly applied in patients with primary myelofibrosis have been defined, and the most recent ones include cytogenetic and molecular parameters with prognostic significance. Additional different clinic-pathologic changes have been reported that may occur during the course of the disease and that are, at present, classified as WHO-defined types of progression, although they likely represent such an event. The present review is meant to provide an updated overview on progression in Ph-chromosome-negative MPN, with a major focus on the pathologic side.

Genetic Landscape of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms with an Emphasis on Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory Testing

Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms with driver events including the BCR-ABL1 translocation leading to a diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), or somatic mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL resulting in Philadelphia-chromosome-negative MPNs with constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. In the Philadelphia-chromosome-negative MPNs, modern sequencing panels have identified a vast molecular landscape including additional mutations in genes involved in splicing, signal transduction, DNA methylation, and chromatin modification such as ASXL1, SF3B1, SRSF2, and U2AF1. These additional mutations often influence prognosis in MPNs and therefore are increasingly important for risk stratification. This review focuses on the molecular alterations within the WHO classification of MPNs and laboratory testing used for diagnosis.

Recent Advances in Molecular Diagnostics and Targeted Therapy of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Simple Summary

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal hematologic malignancies with dysregulated myeloid blood cell production driven by JAK2, calreticulin, and MPL gene mutations. Technological advances have revealed a heterogeneous genomic landscape with additional mutations mainly in epigenetic regulators and splicing factors, which are of diagnostic and prognostic value and may inform treatment decisions. Thus, genetic testing has become an integral part of the state-of-the-art work-up for MPN. The finding that JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations activate JAK2 signaling has promoted the development of targeted JAK2 inhibitor therapies. However, their disease-modifying potential remains limited and investigations of additional molecular vulnerabilities in MPN are imperative to advance the development of new therapeutic options. Here, we summarize the current insights into the genetic basis of MPN, its use as diagnostic and prognostic tool in clinical settings, and recent advances in targeted therapies for MPN.

Abstract

Somatic mutations in JAK2, calreticulin, and MPL genes drive myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), and recent technological advances have revealed a heterogeneous genomic landscape with additional mutations in MPN. These mainly affect genes involved in epigenetic regulation and splicing and are of diagnostic and prognostic value, predicting the risk of progression and informing decisions on therapeutic management. Thus, genetic testing has become an integral part of the current state-of-the-art laboratory work-up for MPN patients and has been implemented in current guidelines for disease classification, tools for prognostic risk assessment, and recommendations for therapy. The finding that JAK2, CALR, and MPL driver mutations activate JAK2 signaling has provided a rational basis for the development of targeted JAK2 inhibitor therapies and has fueled their translation into clinical practice. However, the disease-modifying potential of JAK2 inhibitors remains limited and is further impeded by loss of therapeutic responses in a substantial proportion of patients over time. Therefore, the investigation of additional molecular vulnerabilities involved in MPN pathogenesis is imperative to advance the development of new therapeutic options. Combination of novel compounds with JAK2 inhibitors are of specific interest to enhance therapeutic efficacy of molecularly targeted treatment approaches. Here, we summarize the current insights into the genetic basis of MPN, its use as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in clinical settings, and the most recent advances in targeted therapies for MPN.

Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelofibrosis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative therapeutic modality for patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis (MF). However, many patients are considered ineligible for allo-HCT, and transplant-related mortality can be substantial. Data on the efficacy and safety of allo-HCT are mixed and largely derived from retrospective studies. We aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the safety and efficacy of allo-HCT in MF and to identify patient, disease, and transplant characteristics with prognostic impact on outcomes of patients with MF undergoing allo-HCT. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to October 11, 2020, for studies on allo-HCT in MF. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates for the co-primary outcomes of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS). Rates of non-relapse mortality and acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) were studied as secondary endpoints. Subgroup analyses on the effect of conditioning regimen intensity, baseline dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) score, and patient age were performed. The study protocol has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020188706). Forty-three studies with 8739 patients were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Rates of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year OS were 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.5%-69.8%), 64.4% (95% CI, 57.6%-70.6%), and 55.0% (95% CI, 51.8%-58.3%), respectively. Rates of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year nonrelapse mortality were 25.9% (95% CI, 23.3%-28.7%), 29.7% (95% CI, 24.5%-35.4%), and 30.5% (95% CI, 25.9%-35.5%), respectively. The combined rate of graft failure was 10.6% (95% CI, 8.9%-12.5%) with primary and secondary graft failure occurring in 7.3% (95% CI, 5.7%-9.4%) and 5.9% (95% CI, 4.3%-8.0%) of patients, respectively. Rates of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were 44.0% (95% CI, 39.6%-48.4%; grade III/IV: 15.2%) and 46.5% (95% CI, 42.2%-50.8%; extensive or moderate/severe: 26.1%), respectively. Subgroup analyses did not show any significant difference between conditioning regimen intensity (myeloablative versus reduced-intensity), median patient age, and proportion of DIPSS-intermediate-2/high patients. The quality of the evidence is limited by the absence of randomized clinical trials in the field and the heterogeneity of patient and transplant characteristics across included studies. Given the poor prognosis of patients not receiving transplants and in the absence of curative nontransplantation therapies, our results support consideration of allo-HCT for eligible patients with MF.

Classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): A continuum of different disease entities

Classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell-derived disorders characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of differentiated myeloid cells and close pathobiologic and clinical features. According to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, MPNs include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The 2016 revision aimed in particular at strengthening the distinction between masked PV and JAK2-mutated ET, and between prefibrotic/early (pre-PMF) and overt PMF. Clinical manifestations in MPNs include constitutional symptoms, microvascular disorders, thrombosis and bleeding, splenomegaly secondary to extramedullary hematopoiesis, cytopenia-related symptoms, and progression to overt MF and acute leukemia. A dysregulation of the JAK/STAT pathway is the unifying mechanistic hallmark of MPNs, and is guided by somatic mutations in driver genes including JAK2, CALR and MPL. Additional mutations in myeloid neoplasm-associated genes have been also identified, with established prognostic relevance, particularly in PMF. Prognostication of MPN patients relies on disease-specific clinical models. The increasing knowledge of MPN biology led to the development of integrated clinical and molecular prognostic scores that allow a more refined stratification. Recently, the therapeutic landscape of MPNs has been revolutionized by the introduction of potent, selective JAK inhibitors (ruxolitinib, fedratinib), that proved effective in controlling disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly, yet leaving unmet critical needs, owing the lack of disease-modifying activity. In this review, we will deal with molecular, clinical, and therapeutic aspects of the three classical MPNs aiming at highlighting either shared characteristics, that overall define a continuum within a single disease family, and uniqueness, at the same time.

The Role of Neutrophilic Granulocytes in Philadelphia Chromosome Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are composed of polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocytosis (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The clinical picture is determined by constitutional symptoms and complications, including arterial and venous thromboembolic or hemorrhagic events. MPNs are characterized by mutations in JAK2, MPL, or CALR, with additional mutations leading to an expansion of myeloid cell lineages and, in PMF, to marrow fibrosis and cytopenias. Chronic inflammation impacting the initiation and expansion of disease in a major way has been described. Neutrophilic granulocytes play a major role in the pathogenesis of thromboembolic events via the secretion of inflammatory markers, as well as via interaction with thrombocytes and the endothelium. In this review, we discuss the molecular biology underlying myeloproliferative neoplasms and point out the central role of leukocytosis and, specifically, neutrophilic granulocytes in this group of disorders.

Clinical Utility of Fedratinib in Myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal hematologic malignancy characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms with a propensity towards leukemic transformation. Constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway is a well-described pathogenic feature of MF. Allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only curative therapy, but due to high morbidity and mortality this option is not available for most patients. There are two approved targeted therapy options for MF, ruxolitinib and fedratinib. In this review, we discuss the clinical utility of fedratinib in the myelofibrosis treatment paradigm. Fedratinib has shown impressive pre-clinical and clinical efficacy in patients with untreated MF as well as in those with ruxolitinib intolerance and those with relapsed/refractory MF. Here, we review the pre-clinical and clinical trials that led to the approval of fedratinib, and the ongoing late-phase trials. We highlight several areas regarding the clinical utility of fedratinib that remain unanswered. We discuss the limitations of fedratinib and address areas that are understudied and require further clinical evaluation and research. The approval of fedratinib has provided a significant expansion to the very limited treatment armamentarium available to patients with MF.

Integration of Molecular Information in Risk Assessment of Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal disorders of a hematopoietic stem cell, characterized by an abnormal proliferation of largely mature cells driven by mutations in JAK2, CALR, and MPL. All these mutations lead to a constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT signaling, which represents a target for therapy. Beyond driver ones, most patients, especially with myelofibrosis, harbor mutations in an array of "myeloid neoplasm-associated" genes that encode for proteins involved in chromatin modification and DNA methylation, RNA splicing, transcription regulation, and oncogenes. These additional mutations often arise in the context of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). The extensive characterization of the pathologic genome associated with MPN highlighted selected driver and non-driver mutations for their clinical informativeness. First, driver mutations are enlisted in the WHO classification as major diagnostic criteria and may be used for monitoring of residual disease after transplantation and response to treatment. Second, mutation profile can be used, eventually in combination with cytogenetic, histopathologic, hematologic, and clinical variables, to risk stratify patients regarding thrombosis, overall survival, and rate of transformation to secondary leukemia. This review outlines the molecular landscape of MPN and critically interprets current information for their potential impact on patient management.

JAK Be Nimble: Reviewing the Development of JAK Inhibitors and JAK Inhibitor Combinations for Special Populations of Patients with Myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm hallmarked by uncontrolled blood counts, constitutional symptoms, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and an increased risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are the most common treatment for MF due to their ability to reduce spleen size and improve disease-related symptoms; however, JAK inhibitors are not suitable for every patient and their impact on MF is limited in several respects. Novel JAK inhibitors and JAK inhibitor combinations are emerging that aim to enhance the treatment landscape, providing deeper responses to a broader population of patients with the continued hope of providing disease modification and improving long-term outcomes. In this review, we highlight several specific areas of unmet need within MF. Subsequently, we review agents that target those areas of unmet need, focusing specifically on the JAK inhibitors, momelotinib, pacritinib, itacitinib, and NS-018 as well as JAK inhibitor combination approaches using CPI-0610, navitoclax, parsaclisib, and luspatercept.

Calreticulin mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Calreticulin (CALR) is a chaperone present in the endoplasmic reticulum, which is involved in the quality control of N-glycosylated proteins and storage of calcium ions. In 2013, the C-terminal mutation in CALR was identified in half of the patients with essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis who did not have a JAK2 or MPL mutation. The results of 8 years of intensive research are changing the clinical practice associated with treating myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The presence or absence of CALR mutations and their mutation types already provide important information for diagnosis and treatment decision making. In addition, the interaction with the thrombopoietin receptor MPL, which is the main mechanism of transformation by CALR mutation, and the expression of the mutant protein on the cell surface have a great potential as targets for molecular-targeted drugs and immunotherapy. This chapter presents recent findings on the clinical significance of the CALR mutation and the molecular basis by which this mutation drives MPNs.

Current Concepts of Pathogenesis and Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by dysregulated proliferation of mature myeloid blood cells. They can present as polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, or myelofibrosis and are characterized by constitutive activation of JAK2 signaling. They share a propensity for thrombo-hemorrhagic complications and the risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Attention has also been drawn to JAK2 mutant clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential as a possible precursor state of MPN. Insight into the pathogenesis as well as options for the treatment of MPN has increased in the last years thanks to modern sequencing technologies and functional studies. Mutational analysis provides information on the oncogenic driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL in the majority of MPN patients. In addition, molecular markers enable more detailed prognostication and provide guidance for therapeutic decisions. While JAK2 inhibitors represent a standard of care for MF and resistant/refractory PV, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only therapy with a curative potential in MPN so far but is reserved to a subset of patients. Thus, novel concepts for therapy are an important need, particularly in MF. Novel JAK2 inhibitors, combination therapy approaches with ruxolitinib, as well as therapeutic approaches addressing new molecular targets are in development. Current standards and recent advantages are discussed in this review.

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Enable Disease Modeling and Drug Screening in Calreticulin del52 and ins5 Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Mutations in the calreticulin (CALR) gene are seen in about 30% of essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis patients. To address the contribution of the human CALR mutants to the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in an endogenous context, we modeled the CALRdel52 and CALRins5 mutants by induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology using CD34⁺ progenitors from 4 patients. We describe here the generation of several clones of iPSC carrying heterozygous CALRdel52 or CALRins5 mutations. We showed that CALRdel52 induces a stronger increase in progenitors than CALRins5 and that both CALRdel52 and CALRins5 mutants favor an expansion of the megakaryocytic lineage. Moreover, we found that both CALRdel52 and CALRins5 mutants rendered colony forming unit–megakaryocyte (CFU-MK) independent from thrombopoietin (TPO), and promoted a mild constitutive activation level of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in megakaryocytes. Unexpectedly, a mild increase in the sensitivity of colony forming unit-granulocyte (CFU-G) to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was also observed in iPSC CALRdel52 and CALRins5 compared with control iPSC. Moreover, CALRdel52-induced megakaryocytic spontaneous growth is more dependent on Janus kinase 2/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase than TPO-mediated growth and opens a therapeutic window for treatments in CALR-mutated MPN. The iPSC models described here represent an interesting platform for testing newly developed inhibitors. Altogether, this study shows that CALR-mutated iPSC recapitulate MPN phenotypes in vitro and may be used for drug screening.

Predictive Value of Kozak Gene Polymorphism for Thrombosis in Patients with Philadelphia-Negative MPNs

Background:

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and myelofibrosis are clonal haematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by dysregulated proliferation. The arterial and venous thromboses are the major causes of morbidity and mortality in MPNs. The platelet GP Ib-IX-V receptor complex plays an important role in thrombus formation as the Kozak sequence polymorphism of platelet GP Ibα is associated with increased receptor density.

Materials and Methods:

This study was conducted on 286 diagnosed patients with Ph-negative MPNs (94 patients of PV, 102 of ET and 90 of MF). In addition, 107 apparently healthy individuals served as a control group.

Results:

This study revealed that by taking rs2243093 TT as the reference genotype and T as the reference allele; TC, CC, TC+CC genotypes showed lower frequency in ET patients (p= 0.005, 0.007 and 0.001 respectively) and MF patients (p= 0.002, 0.047 and 0.001 respectively) when compared to control groups also, C allele in both groups compared to control (p ≤ 0.001 both). CC genotypes and C allele showed lower frequency in PV patients when compared to control groups (p= 0.032 and 0.026 respectively).

Conclusion:

From this study we could conclude that patients with Philadelphia-negative MPNs carried Kozak gene polymorphism significantly TT genotype in all patients PV, ET, MF patients and TC in ET and MF patients. The platelet glycoprotein Ibα (Kozak) gene could be incorporated into the routine workup to predict venous thrombosis in patients with Ph-negative MPNs specially ET patients.

The Contemporary Approach to CALR-Positive Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

CALR mutations are a revolutionary discovery and represent an important hallmark of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), especially essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis. To date, several CALR mutations were identified, with only frameshift mutations linked to the diseased phenotype. It is of diagnostic and prognostic importance to properly define the type of CALR mutation and subclassify it according to its structural similarities to the classical mutations, a 52-bp deletion (type 1 mutation) and a 5-bp insertion (type 2 mutation), using a statistical approximation algorithm (AGADIR). Today, the knowledge on the pathogenesis of CALR-positive MPN is expanding and several cellular mechanisms have been recognized that finally cause a clonal hematopoietic expansion. In this review, we discuss the current basis of the cellular effects of CALR mutants and the understanding of its implementation in the current diagnostic laboratorial and medical practice. Different methods of CALR detection are explained and a diagnostic algorithm is shown that aids in the approach to CALR-positive MPN. Finally, contemporary methods joining artificial intelligence in accordance with molecular-genetic biomarkers in the approach to MPN are presented.

Analysis of Common Driver Mutations in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of hematopoietic stem cell disorders that include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). This study examines the driver mutations among patients with MPNs in Kuwait.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of 942 MPN cases with a driver mutation from July 2007 to June 2019 to examine their demographic, clinical, and laboratory attributes.

RESULTS

The annual incidence of MPNs is 1.6 per 100,000 persons, and ET is the most common subtype. The median age of our cohort was 55 years, and the patients were predominantly male. We found that the most frequent gene mutation of MPNs in our cohort was the JAK2V617F mutation, which was present in 90% of cases, followed by the CALR exon 9, MPLW515L/K, and JAK2 exon 12 mutations. In our cohort, thrombotic events were observed in 18.7% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Although Philadelphia-negative MPNs are rare hematologic malignancies, thrombosis is a relatively common initial presentation. The JAK2V617F mutation was the driver mutation in the majority of patients with MPN.

Mutation profile in BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: A single-center experience from India

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Recurrent somatic mutations in the JAK2, calreticulin (CALR), and the MPL genes are described as drivers of BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) that includes polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocytosis (ET), primary myelofibrosis (PMF), and MPN unclassified (MPN-U).

METHODS

We describe the mutation profile and clinical features of MPN cases diagnosed at a tertiary care center. JAK2V617F and MPL (S505/W515) mutations were screened by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction, while CALR exon 9 and JAK2 exon 12 mutations were screened by fragment analysis/Sanger sequencing. Among the 1,570 patients tested for these mutations during the study period, 407 were classified as MPN with a diagnosis of PV, ET, PMF, and MPN-U seen in 30%, 17%, 36%, and 17%, respectively, screened.

RESULTS

Similar to previous reports from Asian countries, the incidence of PMF was the highest among the classic MPN. JAK2V617F mutation was detected in 90% of PV, 38% of ET, 48% of PMF, and 65% of MPN-U. JAK2 exon 12 mutations were seen in 5.7% of PV and 1.4% of PMF. CALR exon 9 mutations were seen in 33% of ET, 33% of PMF, and 12% of MPN-U. MPL mutations were detected in 2.8%, 2.7%, and 2.9% of ET, PMF, and MPN-U, respectively. Fifteen % of PMF, 26% of ET, and 22% of MPN-U were triple negative.

CONCLUSION

There was a significantly higher incidence of CALR mutation in PMF and ET cases. Our study highlights the challenges in the diagnosis of JAK2-negative PV and the need for harmonization of criteria for the same.

The role of new technologies in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Application of next-generation sequencing in myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Driver mutations in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are well known. In the past, whole-genome sequencing identified nondriver mutations in other genes, potentially contributing to evolution of malignant clones.

METHODS

Next-generation sequencing was used to assess the presence of any mutations in 14 candidate genes at the point of diagnosis and the resultant impact on the clinical course of the disease.

RESULTS

The study analysed 63 patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Nondriver mutations were detected in 44% of them. The most frequently affected genes were ASXL1 (27%), TET2 (11%) and SF3B1 (6%). The frequency of such mutations was highest in primary MF (59%) and lowest in the prefibrotic phase of primary MF (21%). Patients with prognostically unfavourable sequence variants in genes had significantly worse overall survival (53 vs 71 months; HR = 2.77; 95% CI 1.17-6.56; P = .017).

CONCLUSION

In our study, multivariate analysis proved DIPSS to be the only significant factor to predict patient survival. DIPSS contains all of the important clinical and laboratory factors except genetic changes. Stratification of patients according to DIPSS is still beneficial although there are newer and improved scoring systems like GIPSS or MIPSS70. Assessing subclonal mutations in candidate genes during diagnosis may aid in the identification of high-risk MF patients and is therefore relevant for making a prediction for overall survival more accurate.

Triple-Negative Essential Thrombocythemia: Clinical-Pathological and Molecular Features. A Single-Center Cohort Study

Lack of demonstrable mutations affecting JAK2, CALR, or MPL driver genes within the spectrum of BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) is currently referred to as a triple-negative genotype, which is found in about 10% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and 5-10% of those with primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Very few papers are presently available on triple-negative ET, which is basically described as an indolent disease, differently from triple-negative PMF, which is an aggressive myeloid neoplasm, with a significantly higher risk of leukemic evolution. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the bone marrow morphology and the clinical-laboratory parameters of triple-negative ET patients, as well as to determine their molecular profile using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify any potential clonal biomarkers. We evaluated a single-center series of 40 triple-negative ET patients, diagnosed according to the 2017 WHO classification criteria and regularly followed up at the Hematology Unit of our Institution, between January 1983 and January 2019. In all patients, NGS was performed using the Illumina Ampliseq Myeloid Panel; morphological and immunohistochemical features of the bone marrow trephine biopsies were also thoroughly reviewed. Nucleotide variants were detected in 35 out of 40 patients. In detail, 29 subjects harbored one or two variants and six cases showed three or more concomitant nucleotide changes. The most frequent sequence variants involved the TET2 gene (55.0%), followed by KIT (27.5%). Histologically, most of the cases displayed a classical ET morphology. Interestingly, prevalent megakaryocytes morphology was more frequently polymorphic with a mixture of giant megakaryocytes with hyperlobulated nuclei, normal and small sized maturing elements, and naked nuclei. Finally, in five cases a mild degree of reticulin fibrosis (MF-1) was evident together with an increase in the micro-vessel density. By means of NGS we were able to identify nucleotide variants in most cases, thus we suggest that a sizeable proportion of triple-negative ET patients do have a clonal disease. In analogy with driver genes-mutated MPNs, these observations may prevent issues arising concerning triple-negative ET treatment, especially when a cytoreductive therapy may be warranted.

Impact of Integrated Genetic Information on Diagnosis and Prognostication for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in the Next-Generation Sequencing Era

Since next-generation sequencing has been widely used in clinical laboratories, the diagnosis and risk stratification of hematologic malignancies are greatly dependent on genetic aberrations. In this study, we analyzed the genomic landscapes of 200 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and evaluated the impact of the genomic landscape on diagnosis and risk stratification. Mutations in JAK2, CALR and MPL were detected in 76.4% of MPNs. The proportion of patients with clonal genetic markers increased up to 86.4% when all detectable genetic aberrations were included. Significant co-occurring genetic aberrations potentially associated with phenotype and/or disease progression, including those in JAK2/SF3B1 and TP53/del(13q), del(5q), −7/del(7q) and complex karyotypes, were detected. We also identified genetic aberrations associated with patient outcomes: TP53 and −7/del(7q) were associated with an inferior chance of survival, RUNX1, TP53 and IDH1/2 were associated with leukemic transformation and SF3B1, IDH1/2, ASXL1 and del(20q) were associated with fibrotic progression. We compared risk stratification systems and found that mutation-enhanced prognostic scoring systems could identify lower risk polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and higher risk primary myelofibrosis. Furthermore, the new risk stratification systems showed a better predictive capacity for patient outcome. These results collectively indicate that integrated genetic information can enhance diagnosis and prognostication in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Genetics of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are hematopoietic stem cell disorders based on somatic mutations in JAK2, calreticulin, or MPL activating JAK-STAT signaling. Modern sequencing efforts have revealed the genomic landscape of myeloproliferative neoplasms with additional genetic alterations mainly in epigenetic modifiers and splicing factors. High molecular risk mutations with adverse outcomes have been identified and clonal evolution may promote progression to fibrosis and acute myeloid leukemia. JAK2V617F is recurrently detected in clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential with increased risk for vascular events. Insights into the genetics of myeloproliferative neoplasms has facilitated diagnosis and prognostication and poses novel candidates for targeted therapeutic intervention.

Genetics and Pathogenetic Role of Inflammasomes in Philadelphia Negative Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Narrative Review

The last decade has been very important for the quantity of preclinical information obtained regarding chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and the following will be dedicated to the translational implications of the new biological acquisitions. The overcoming of the mechanistic model of clonal evolution and the entry of chronic inflammation and dysimmunity into the new model are the elements on which to base a part of future therapeutic strategies. The innate immune system plays a major role in this context. Protagonists of the initiation and regulation of many pathological aspects, from cytokine storms to fibrosis, the NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasomes guide and condition the natural history of the disease. For this reason, MPNs share many biological and clinical aspects with non-neoplastic diseases, such as autoimmune disorders. Finally, cardiovascular risk and disturbances in iron metabolism and myelopoiesis are also closely linked to the role of inflammasomes. Although targeted therapies are already being tested, an increase in knowledge on the subject is desirable and potentially translates into better care for patients with MPNs.

Clinical impacts of the mutational spectrum in Japanese patients with primary myelofibrosis

Patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) have a poorer prognosis than those with other subtypes of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). To investigate the relationship between gene mutations and the prognosis of Japanese PMF patients, we analyzed mutations in 72 regions located in 14 MPN-relevant genes (CSF3R, MPL, JAK2, CALR, DNMT3A, TET2, EZH2, ASXL1, IDH1/2, SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, and TP53) utilizing a target resequencing platform. In our cohort, ASXL1 mutations were more frequently detected in both overt and prefibrotic PMF patients than other mutations. The frequency of ASXL1 mutations was slightly higher among overt PMF patients than among prefibrotic PMF patients (44.6% vs 25.0%, FDR = 0.472). Decision tree classification algorithms revealed that ASXL1, EZH2, and SRSF2 mutations were associated with a poor prognosis for overt PMF. Overall survival was significantly shorter in patients harboring ASXL1, EZH2, or SRSF2 mutations than in those without these mutations (p = 0.03). These results suggest that, as reported in Western countries, MIPSS70 is applicable to Japanese PMF patients and ASXL1, EZH2, and SRSF2 mutations may be utilized as surrogate markers of a poor prognosis.

The 2020 revision of the guidelines for the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms

In 2016, the World Health Organization revised the diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) based on the discovery of disease-driving genetic aberrations and extensive analysis of the clinical characteristics of patients with MPNs. Recent studies have suggested that additional somatic mutations have a clinical impact on the prognosis of patients harboring these genetic abnormalities. Treatment strategies have also advanced with the introduction of JAK inhibitors, one of which has been approved for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis and those with hydroxyurea-resistant or intolerant polycythemia vera. Recently developed drugs aim to elicit hematologic responses, as well as symptomatic and molecular responses, and the response criteria were refined accordingly. Based on these changes, we have revised the guidelines and present the diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification of MPNs encountered in Korea.

The risk of thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia is associated with the type of CALR mutation: A multicentre collaborative study

OBJECTIVES

In patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), after the JAK2V617F driver mutation, mutations in CALR are common (classified as type 1, 52-bp deletion or type 2, 5-bp insertion). CALR mutations have generally been associated with a lower risk of thrombosis. This study aimed to confirm the impact of CALR mutation type on thrombotic risk.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 983 ET patients diagnosed in Spanish and Polish hospitals.

RESULTS

With 7.5 years of median follow-up from diagnosis, 155 patients (15.8%) had one or more thrombotic event. The 5-year thrombosis-free survival (TFS) rate was 83.8%, 91.6% and 93.9% for the JAK2V617F, CALR-type 1 and CALR-type 2 groups, respectively (P = .002). Comparing CALR-type 1 and CALR-type 2 groups, TFS for venous thrombosis was lower in CALR-type 1 (P = .046), with no difference in TFS for arterial thrombosis observed. The cumulative incidence of thrombosis was significantly different comparing JAK2V617F vs CALR-type 2 groups but not JAK2V617F vs CALR-type 1 groups. Moreover, CALR-type 2 mutation was a statistically significant protective factor for thrombosis with respect to JAK2V617F in multivariate logistic regression (OR: 0.45, P = .04) adjusted by age.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that CALR mutation type has prognostic value for the stratification of thrombotic risk in ET patients.

Challenges and Perspectives for Therapeutic Targeting of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are hematopoietic stem cell disorders with dysregulated myeloid blood cell production and propensity for transformation to acute myeloid leukemia, thrombosis, and bleeding. Acquired mutations in JAK2, MPL, and CALR converge on hyperactivation of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) signaling as a central feature of MPN. Accordingly, JAK2 inhibitors have held promise for therapeutic targeting. After the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, similar JAK2 inhibitors as fedratinib are entering clinical use. While patients benefit with reduced splenomegaly and symptoms, disease-modifying effects on MPN clone size and clonal evolution are modest. Importantly, response to ruxolitinib may be lost upon treatment suggesting the MPN clone acquires resistance. Resistance mutations, as seen with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have not been described in MPN patients suggesting that functional processes reactivate JAK2 signaling. Compensatory signaling, which bypasses JAK2 inhibition, and other processes contribute to intrinsic resistance of MPN cells restricting efficacy of JAK2 inhibition overall. Combinations of JAK2 inhibition with pegylated interferon-α, a well-established therapy of MPN, B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibition, and others are in clinical development with the potential to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Novel single-agent approaches targeting other molecules than JAK2 are being investigated clinically. Special focus should be placed on myelofibrosis patients with anemia and thrombocytopenia, a delicate patient population at high need for options. The extending range of new treatment approaches will increase the therapeutic options for MPN patients. This calls for concomitant improvement of our insight into MPN biology to inform tailored therapeutic strategies for individual MPN patients.

Pacritinib demonstrates spleen volume reduction in patients with myelofibrosis independent of JAK2V617F allele burden

Myelofibrosis (MF) has heterogeneous clinical manifestations, with some patients exhibiting a myelodepletive phenotype characterized by cytopenias and an absent or low JAK2V617F allele burden. Ruxolitinib may be less effective in these patients. We assessed the efficacy of pacritinib, a JAK2/IRAK1 inhibitor, in MF patients with low JAK2V617F allele burden. In this post hoc analysis of the PERSIST-1 and -2 trials, patients with MF randomized to pacritinib or best available therapy (BAT) were stratified by JAK2V617F allele burden quartile for spleen response of ≥35% and improvement in total symptom score of ≥50%. Five hundred thirty-six patients were included. Patients with lower JAK2V617F allele burden had smaller baseline spleens and lower hemoglobin and platelet counts as compared with higher allele burden patients. Among pacritinib-treated patients, spleen responses were observed across all JAK2V617F allele burden quartiles and in JAK2V617F- disease. No spleen responses were observed among BAT-treated patients with allele burden ≤50% or JAK2V617F- disease. The intention-to-treat response rate was significantly higher on the pacritinib arm for JAK2V617F- disease (23.0% vs 0%; P = .033), and for the lowest allele burden quartiles (0%-25%: 20.9% vs 0%, P < .001; 25%-50%: 15.4% vs 0%, P = .020). There were significantly more symptom responders with pacritinib vs BAT in the 0% to 25% and 25% to 50% cohorts. Pacritinib treatment led to superior spleen and symptom burden reduction compared with BAT in patients with absent or low JAK2V617F allele burden, suggesting that pacritinib may be uniquely suited for patients with myelodepletive MF.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms treated with hydroxyurea, pegylated interferon alpha-2A or ruxolitinib: clinicohematologic responses, quality-of-life changes and safety in the real-world setting

Introduction: Real-world data of responses, quality-of-life (QOL) changes and adverse events in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) on conventional therapy (hydroxyurea ± anagrelide), pegylated interferon alpha-2A (PEG-IFNα-2A) or ruxolitinib are limited. Methods: We prospectively studied MPN patients receiving conventional therapy, PEG-IFNα-2A or ruxolitinib. Next-generation sequencing of 69 myeloid-related genes was performed. Clinicohematologic responses, adverse events, and QOL (determined by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score, MPN-SAF TSS) were evaluated. Results: Seventy men and fifty-five women with polycythemia vera (PV) (N = 23), essential thrombocythemia (ET) (N = 56) and myelofibrosis (MF) (N = 46) were studied for a median of 36 (range: 19-42) months. In PV, responses were comparable for different modalities. CREBBP mutations were associated with inferior responses. In ET, PEG-IFNα-2A resulted in superior clinicohematologic complete responses (CHCR) (P = 0.045). In MF, superior overall response rates (ORR) were associated with ruxolintib (P = 0.018) and JAK2V617F mutation (P = 0.04). For the whole cohort, ruxolitinib led to rapid and sustained reduction in spleen size within the first 6 months, and significant improvement of QOL as reflected by reduction in MPN-SAF TSS (P < 0.001). Adverse events of grades 1-2 were observed in 44%, 62% and 20% of patients receiving conventional therapy, PEG-IFNα-2A and ruxolitinib respectively; and of grade 3-4 in 7% and 9% of patients receiving PEG-IFNα-2A and ruxolitinib. Conclusions: Conventional therapy, PEG-IFNα-2A and ruxolitinib induced responses in all MPN subtypes. PEG-IFNα-2A led to superior CHCR in ET; whereas ruxolitinib resulted in superior ORR in MF, and significant reduction in spleen size and improvement in QOL.

Impact of Mutational Profile on the Management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Short Review of the Emerging Data

Philadelphia-chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by an increased risk of thrombosis and progression to acute myeloid leukemia. MPN are associated with driver mutations in JAK2, CALR and MPL which are crucial for the diagnosis and lead to a constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT signaling, independent of cytokine regulation. Moreover, most patients have concomitant mutations in genes involved in DNA methylation, chromatin modification, messenger RNA splicing, transcription regulation and signal transduction. These additional mutations may arise before, in the context of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), or after the acquisition of the driver mutation. The clinical phenotype of MPN results from complex interactions between mutations and host factors. The increased application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques to a large series of patients with MPN has expanded the knowledge of mutational landscape and contributed to define the clinical significance of mutations. This molecular information is being increasingly used to refine diagnosis, risk stratification, monitoring of residual disease and response to treatment. ASXL1, SRSF2, EZH2, IDH1/IDH2 and U2AF1 mutations are associated with a more advanced disease and reduced overall survival in primary myelofibrosis (PMF), whereas spliceosome mutations in Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) adversely affect both overall (SF3B1, SRSF2 in ET and SRSF2 in PV) and myelofibrosis-free (U2AF1, SF3B1 in ET) survival. This review discusses current knowledge of the molecular landscape of MPN, and how the availability of those molecular information may impact patient management.

Primary myelofibrosis with concurrent CALR and MPL mutations: A case report

BACKGROUND

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by recurrent mutations in the JAK2, CALR, and MPL genes. The CALR and MPL co-mutation is very rare. To our knowledge, no more than five cases have been reported. Here, we report a case of PMF in which a CALR and MPL co-mutation was detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, and a literature review was performed.

CASE SUMMARY

A 73-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital in 2018 due to abdominal distension. The patient had splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, leukopenia, anemia, and immature granulocytes in peripheral blood. There were dacrocytes and atypical megakaryocytes in bone marrow, and megakaryocytic proliferation was very active, accompanied by reticulin fibrosis grade 2. By NGS analysis of the bone marrow sample, we detected mutations in CALR, MPL, and PIK3RI, while JAK2 V617F and BCR-ABL were negative. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with PMF and received oral ruxolitinib. However, the spleen and hematologic responses were poor. We review the literature, analyze previous reports of the mutation sites in our patient and differences between our patient and other reported cases of co-mutated CALR and MPL genes, and discuss the reason why the CALR and MPL co-mutations are rare and possible mechanisms and their impact on the prognosis of patients.

CONCLUSION

CALR and MPL mutations can be concurrent in MPN, but they are rare. The use of NGS may help to identify more patients with co-mutated CALR and MPL genes. This will help to further explore the mechanism and its impact on these patients to develop appropriate treatment strategies.

The Genetic Basis of Primary Myelofibrosis and Its Clinical Relevance

Among classical BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the most aggressive subtype from a clinical standpoint, posing a great challenge to clinicians. Whilst the biological consequences of the three MPN driver gene mutations (JAK2, CALR, and MPL) have been well described, recent data has shed light on the complex and dynamic structure of PMF, that involves competing disease subclones, sequentially acquired genomic events, mostly in genes that are recurrently mutated in several myeloid neoplasms and in clonal hematopoiesis, and biological interactions between clonal hematopoietic stem cells and abnormal bone marrow niches. These observations may contribute to explain the wide heterogeneity in patients' clinical presentation and prognosis, and support the recent effort to include molecular information in prognostic scoring systems used for therapeutic decision-making, leading to promising clinical translation. In this review, we aim to address the topic of PMF molecular genetics, focusing on four questions: (1) what is the role of mutations on disease pathogenesis? (2) what is their impact on patients' clinical phenotype? (3) how do we integrate gene mutations in the risk stratification process? (4) how do we take advantage of molecular genetics when it comes to treatment decisions?

Salvage Therapy Using Azacitidine for Relapsed Primary Myelofibrosis after Cord Blood Transplantation

We present the case of a 53-year-old woman with prefibrotic stage primary myelofibrosis (PMF) who underwent cord blood transplantation. Nine years after transplantation, she relapsed, which was confirmed by a bone marrow examination. We decided to treat her using azacitidine. After three courses of azacitidine, a partial cytogenetic response was confirmed. Azacitidine maintenance therapy successfully maintained a low level of recipient-origin peripheral blood cells with a stable hematological condition. Azacitidine may therefore be a promising therapeutic option for PMF patients who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.