Androgen receptor expression in breast cancer in relation to molecular phenotype: results from the Nurses' Health Study

Clinical-pathologic characteristics and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative low Ki-67 proliferation (TNLP) breast cancers

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) often have a high Ki-67 proliferation index and respond favorably to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with pathologic complete response (pCR) resulting in ~40% of cases. Nevertheless, morbidity/mortality remain high, mostly due to recurrence in patients with residual disease. In contrast, the incidence and clinical features of TNBC with low proliferation (TNLP), defined as TNBC with a Ki-67 index of ≤30% remains unknown. We report 70 cases of TNLP identified at our center from 2008 to 2018, including 18 treated with NACT. TNLP tumors represent <1% of all breast cancers, and ~5-10% of TNBCs. Ninety percent of carcinomas were grade I/II and 70% were either pure apocrine or showed apocrine differentiation. Fifty cases had available immunohistochemistry results; 80%, 84%, 22%, and 20% were positive for AR, INPP4B, nestin, and SOX10, respectively. With a median follow-up of 72 months, 14% experienced recurrence, and 11% died of breast cancer. The tumor stage was prognostic. Among 39 stage-I patients, 18 (46%) received chemotherapy, but this did not impact survival. There was a trend for improved recurrence-free survival with chemotherapy in stage-II patients. Of the 18 patients treated with NACT, 2 (11%) showed pCR; these were notable for either high stromal TILs or a high mitotic count despite a low Ki-67 index. TNLPs are enriched in low to intermediate-grade carcinomas with apocrine features. Due to overall good prognosis of stage-I TNLP and the lack of clear benefit of chemotherapy, de-escalation of chemotherapy may be considered in select patients with stage-I TNLP.

Case Report: Response to Immunotherapy and Anti-Androgen Therapy in Male Occult Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Male occult triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an exceedingly rare form of breast cancer, and prospective information regarding its management is therefore lacking. Current treatment strategies are largely extrapolated from clinical trials of female breast cancer, leading to substantial knowledge gaps concerning the optimal management of male breast cancer. Here, we present a male patient with occult TNBC who responded to immunotherapy, with an obvious reduction in his tumor burden following antiandrogen therapy, after heavy treatment with several lines of chemotherapy. This case highlights the potential efficacy of immunotherapy in cases of male TNBC and suggests a role for antiandrogen therapy in managing patients with luminal androgen receptor-positive TNBC.

Targeted Intervention of NF2-YAP Signaling Axis in CD24-Overexpressing Cells Contributes to Encouraging Therapeutic Effects in TNBC

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells have not been usefully classified, and no targeted therapeutic plans are currently available, resulting in a high recurrence rate and metastasis potential. In this research, CD24^high cells accounted for the vast majority of TNBC cells, and they were insensitive to Taxol but sensitive to ferroptosis agonists and effectively escaped phagocytosis by tumor-associated macrophages. Furthermore, the NF2-YAP signaling axis modulated the expression of ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1) and CD24 in CD24^high cells, with subsequent ferroptotic regulation and macrophage phagocytosis. In addition, a precision targeted therapy system was designed based on the pH level and glutathione response, and it can be effectively used to target CD24^high cells to induce lysosomal escape and drug burst release through CO₂ production, resulting in enhanced ferroptosis and macrophage phagocytosis through FSP1 and CD24 inhibition mediated by the NF2-YAP signaling axis. This system achieved dual antitumor effects, ultimately promoting cell death and thus inhibiting TNBC tumor growth, with some tumors even disappearing. The composite nanoprecision treatment system reported in this paper is a potential strategic tool for future use in the treatment of TNBC.

Androgen receptor expression and its prognostic value in T1N0 luminal/HER2- breast cancer

Purpose: The authors aimed to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of androgen receptor (AR) expression in patients with luminal/human EGFR2 negative (HER2-) T1N0 breast cancer. Methods: The cohort in this retrospective study comprised 471 patients with luminal/HER2- T1N0 breast cancer who had undergone surgery between 2013 and 2017 in the authors' center. Results: Androgen receptor (AR)+ tumors were associated with favorable characteristics. AR+ patients had better 5-year recurrence-free survival rates and the risk of recurrence was greater for AR- than for AR+ patients. AR- status predicted the failure of adjuvant endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors and of adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide. Conclusion: AR+ expression is significantly related to a better prognosis. AR expression may be an additional biomarker for both endocrine and chemotherapy responsiveness.

Androgen receptor splice variant-7 in breast cancer: clinical and pathologic correlations

Androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor therapy is a developing treatment for AR-positive breast cancer (BC) with ongoing clinical trials. AR splice variant-7 (AR-V7) is a truncated variant of AR that leads to AR inhibitor therapy resistance in prostate cancer; recent studies have identified AR-V7 in BC and theorized that AR-V7 can have a similar impact. This study assessed the prevalence and clinicopathologic features associated with AR-V7 in a large BC cohort. BC samples were evaluated by MSK-Fusion targeted RNAseq for AR-V7 detection and MSK-IMPACT targeted DNAseq, including triple-negative tumors with no driver alteration and estrogen receptor-positive/ESR1 wildtype tumors progressing on therapy. Among 196 primary and metastatic/recurrent cases (196 RNAseq, 194DNAseq), 9.7% (19/196) were AR-V7 positive and 90.3% (177/196) AR-V7 negative. All AR-V7 positive BC were AR-positive by immunohistochemistry (19/19). The prevalence of AR-V7 by receptor subtype (N = 189) was: 18% (12/67) in ER-/PgR-/HER2-negative BC, 3.7% (4/109) in ER-positive/HER2-negative BC, and 15.4% (2/13) in HER2-positive BC; AR-V7 was detected in one ER-positive/HER2-unknown BC. Apocrine morphology was observed in 42.1% (8/19) of AR-V7 positive BC and 3.4% (6/177) AR-V7 negative BC (P < 0.00001). Notably, AR-V7 was detected in 2 primary BC and 7 metastatic/recurrent BC patients with no prior endocrine therapy. We conclude that positive AR IHC and apocrine morphology are pathologic features that may indicate testing for AR-V7 is warranted in both primary and metastatic BC in the appropriate clinical context. The study findings further encourage the assessment of AR-V7 as a predictive biomarker for AR antagonist benefit in ongoing clinical BC trials.

Prognostic Role of Androgen Receptor Expression in HER2+ Breast Carcinoma Subtypes

HER2+ breast cancer (BC) is an aggressive subtype representing a genetically and biologically heterogeneous group of tumors resulting in variable prognosis and treatment response to HER2-targeted therapies according to estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression. The relationship with androgen receptors (AR), a member of the steroid hormone’s family, is unwell known in BC. The present study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of AR expression in HER2+ BC subtypes. A total of 695 BCs were selected and reviewed, AR, ER, PR and HER2 expression in tumor cells were examined by immunohistochemical method, and the SISH method was used in case of HER2 with equivocal immunohistochemical score (2+). A high prevalence of AR expression (91.5%) in BC HER+ was observed, with minimal differences between luminal and non-luminal tumor. According to steroid receptor expression, tumors were classified in four subgroups, including BC luminal and non-luminal HER2+ expressing or not AR. The luminal BC HER2 + AR+ was associated with lower histological grade, lower tumor size, higher PR expression and lower HER2 intensity of expression (2+). Also, the non-luminal tumors AR+ showed lower tumor size and lower prognostic stage but frequently higher grade and higher HER2 intensity of expression (3+). These findings should suggest a different progression of luminal and non-luminal tumors, both expressing AR, and allow us to speculate that the molecular mechanisms of AR, involved in the biology of BC HER2 + AR+, differ in relation to ER and PR expression. Moreover, AR expression may be a useful predictor of prognosis for overall survival (OS) in HER2+ BC subtypes. Our findings suggest that AR expression evaluation in clinical practice could be utilized in clinical oncology to establish different aggressiveness in BC HER2+ subtypes.

A triple-negative breast cancer surrogate subtype classification that correlates with gene expression subtypes

BACKGROUND

This study developed a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) surrogate subtype classification that represents TNBC subtypes based on the Vanderbilt subtype classification.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary curative surgery for TNBC were included. Representative FFPE blocks were used for gene expression analysis and tissue microarray construction for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The Vanderbilt subtypes were re-classified into four groups: basal-like (BL), mesenchymal-like (M), immunomodulatory (IM) and luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype. Classification and regression tree (CART) modeling was applied to develop a surrogate subtype classification.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were included. The study cohort was allocated to the Vanderbilt 4 subtypes as LAR (n = 22, 15.2%), IM (n = 32, 22.1%), M (n = 38, 26.2%), BL (n = 25, 17.2%) and unclassified (n = 28, 19.3%). After excluding nine (6.2%) patients due to poor IHC staining quality, CART modeling was performed. TNBC surrogate subtypes were defined as follows: LAR subtype, androgen receptor Allred score 8; IM subtype, LAR-negative with a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) score > 70%; M subtype, LAR-negative with a TIL score < 20%; BL subtype, LAR-negative with a TIL score 20-70% and diffuse, strong p16 staining. The study cohort was classified by the surrogate subtypes as LAR (n = 26, 17.9%), IM (n = 21, 14.5%), M (n = 44, 30.3%), BL1 (n = 27, 18.6%) and unclassified (n = 18, 12.4%). Surrogate subtypes predicted TNBC Vanderbilt 4 subtypes with an accuracy of 0.708.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a TNBC surrogate subtype classification that correlates with the Vanderbilt subtype. It is a practical and accessible diagnostic test that can be easily applied in clinical practice.

Overexpression of BQ323636.1 Modulated AR/IL-8/CXCR1 Axis to Confer Tamoxifen Resistance in ER-Positive Breast Cancer

NCOR2 is a co-repressor for estrogen receptor (ER) and androgen receptor (AR). Our group previously identified a novel splice variant of NCOR2, BQ323636.1 (BQ), that mediates tamoxifen resistance via interference of NCOR2 repression on ER. Luciferase reporter assay showed BQ overexpression could enhance the transcriptional activity of androgen response element (ARE). We proposed that BQ employs both AR and ER to confer tamoxifen resistance. Through in silico analysis, we identified interleukin-8 (IL-8) as the sole ERE and ARE containing gene responsiveness to ER and AR activation. We confirmed that BQ overexpression enhanced the expression of IL-8 in ER+ve breast cancer cells, and AR inhibition reduced IL-8 expression in the BQ overexpressing cell lines, suggesting that AR was involved in the modulation of IL-8 expression by BQ. Moreover, we demonstrated that IL-8 could activate both AKT and ERK1/2 via CXCR1 to confer tamoxifen resistance. Targeting CXCR1/2 by a small inhibitor repertaxin reversed tamoxifen resistance of BQ overexpressing breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, BQ overexpression in ER+ve breast cancer can enhance IL-8 mediated signaling to modulate tamoxifen resistance. Targeting IL-8 signaling is a promising approach to overcome tamoxifen resistance in ER+ve breast cancer.

Impact of Androgen Receptor Expression and the AR:ER Ratio on the Survival Outcomes in the Diverse Subgroups of Vietnamese Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Background: The androgen receptor (AR) has recently emerged as a useful marker for the more favorable prognosis and better outcomes among women with estrogen receptor (ER) + ve breast cancer (BC) and the further refinement of BC subtype. Furthermore, AR expression in ER − ve tumors has a particular prognostic significance. Additionally, the ratio of nuclear AR to ER may critically have an influence on tumor biology and respond to endocrine therapy. Purpose: To define the AR expression and AR:ER ratio, and explored their correlation with the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and survival outcomes in the various subclasses of invasive BC. Methods: The current study was conducted on 522 BC patients who had surgical operations, without neoadjuvant chemotherapy by applying a retrospective cohort analysis. The clinicopathological characteristics were recorded. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on AR, ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67. Expression of AR was paired into different immunophenotypes for analysis with clinicopathological features and survival. All BC patients’ survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and log-rank models. Results: The presence of AR was detected in 65.3%. Positive AR, the ratio of AR:ER<2, luminal androgen receptor (LAR) + and AR + HER2 + immunophenotypes were significantly associated with better prognostic features. AR:ER<2 was observed in the prolonged overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (87.9 and 86.2%, respectively) compared to AR:ER≥2 (25.0% in both) (P < .001). In contrast, in HR + ve BCs, the AR expression was not significantly correlated with survival. The multivariate model revealed that the ratio of nuclear AR to ER remained as an independent prognostic variable. Conclusion: The AR expression had a distinct OS and DFS. The AR:ER ratio is an independent indicator for predicting the OS and DFS of BC patients in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

Imaging Androgen Receptors in Breast Cancer with 18F-Fluoro-5α-Dihydrotestosterone PET: A Pilot Study

Most breast cancers express androgen receptors (ARs). This prospective imaging substudy explored imaging of ARs with 18F-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone (18F-FDHT) PET in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving selective AR modulation (SARM) therapy (GTx-024). Methods: Eleven postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive MBC underwent 18F-FDHT PET/CT at baseline and at 6 and 12 wk after starting SARM therapy. Abnormal tumor 18F-FDHT uptake was quantified using SUVmax AR status was determined from tumor biopsy specimens. 18F-FDHT SUVmax percentage change between scans was calculated. Best overall response was categorized as clinical benefit (nonprogressive disease) or progressive disease using RECIST 1.1. Results: The median baseline 18F-FDHT SUVmax was 4.1 (range, 1.4-5.9) for AR-positive tumors versus 2.3 (range, 1.5-3.2) for AR-negative tumors (P = 0.22). Quantitative AR expression and baseline 18F-FDHT uptake were weakly correlated (Pearson ρ = 0.39, P = 0.30). Seven participants with clinical benefit at 12 wk tended to have larger declines in 18F-FDHT uptake than did those with progressive disease both at 6 wk after starting GTx-024 (median, -26.8% [range, -42.9% to -14.1%], vs. -3.7% [range,-31% to +29%], respectively; P = 0.11) and at 12 wk after starting GTx-024 (median, -35.7% [range, -69.5% to -7.7%], vs. -20.1% [range, -26.6% to +56.5%], respectively; P = 0.17). Conclusion: These hypothesis-generating data suggest that 18F-FDHT PET/CT is worth further study as an imaging biomarker for evaluating the response of MBC to SARM therapy and reiterate the feasibility of including molecular imaging in multidisciplinary therapeutic trials.

Androgen receptor in breast cancer: The "5W" questions

Androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in 60-70% of breast cancers (BCs) and the availability of anti-AR compounds, currently used for treating prostate cancer, paves the way to tackle specifically AR-positive BC patients. The prognostic and predictive role of AR in BC is a matter of debate, since the results from clinical trials are not striking, probably due to both technical and biological reasons. In this review, we aimed to highlight WHAT is AR, describing its structure and functions, WHAT to test and HOW to detect AR, WHERE AR should be tested (on primary tumor or metastasis) and WHY studying this fascinating hormone receptor, exploring and debating on its prognostic and predictive role. We considered AR and its ratio with other hormone receptors, analyzing also studies including patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and with early and advanced BC, as well. We also emphasized the effects that both other hormone receptors and the newly emerging androgen-inducible non coding RNAs may have on AR function in BC pathology and the putative implementation in the clinical setting. Moreover, we pointed out the latest results by clinical trials and we speculated about the use of anti-AR therapies in BC clinical practice.

Secreted indicators of androgen receptor activity in breast cancer pre-clinical models

PURPOSE

Accumulating evidence has attracted attention to the androgen receptor (AR) as a biomarker and therapeutic target in breast cancer. We hypothesized that AR activity within the tumor has clinical implications and investigated whether androgen responsive serum factors might serve as a minimally invasive indicator of tumor AR activity.

METHODS

Based on a comprehensive gene expression analysis of an AR-positive, triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model, 163 dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-responsive genes were defined as an androgen responsive gene set. Among them, we focused on genes that were DHT-responsive that encode secreted proteins, namely KLK3, AZGP1 and PIP, that encode the secreted factors prostate specific antigen (PSA), zinc-alpha-2-glycoprotein (ZAG) and prolactin induced protein (PIP), respectively. Using AR-positive breast cancer cell lines representing all breast cancer subtypes, expression of candidate factors was assessed in response to agonist DHT and antagonist enzalutamide. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed on publically available gene expression datasets from breast cancer patients to analyze the relationship between genes encoding the secreted factors and other androgen responsive gene sets in each breast cancer subtype.

RESULTS

Anti-androgen treatment decreased proliferation in all cell lines tested representing various tumor subtypes. Expression of the secreted factors was regulated by AR activation in the majority of breast cancer cell lines. In GSEA, the candidate genes were positively correlated with an androgen responsive gene set across breast cancer subtypes.

CONCLUSION

KLK3, AZGP1 and PIP are AR regulated and reflect tumor AR activity. Further investigations are needed to examine the potential efficacy of these factors as serum biomarkers.

Differential biological effects of aromatase inhibitors: Apoptosis, autophagy, senescence and modulation of the hormonal status in breast cancer cells

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺) breast carcinomas are the most common subtype, corresponding to 60% of the cases in premenopausal and 75% in postmenopausal women. The third-generation of aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the non-steroidal Anastrozole (Ana) and Letrozole (Let) and the steroidal Exemestane (Exe), are considered a first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women. Despite their clinical success, the development of resistance is the major setback in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the lack of cross-resistance between AIs hints that these drugs may act through distinct mechanisms. Therefore, this work studied the different effects induced by AIs on biological processes, such as cell proliferation, death, autophagy and senescence. Moreover, their effects on the regulation of the hormonal environment were also explored. The non-steroidal AIs induce senescence, through increased YPEL3 expression, on aromatase-overexpressing breast cancer cells (MCF-7aro), whereas Exe promotes a cytoprotective autophagy, thus blocking senescence induction. In addition, in a hormone-enriched environment, the non-steroidal AIs prevent estrogen signaling, despite up-regulating the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), while Exe down-regulates ERα and maintains its activation. In these conditions, all AIs up-regulate the androgen receptor (AR) which blocks EGR3 transcription in Exe-treated cells. On the other hand, in hormone-depleted conditions, a crosstalk between AR and ERα occurs, enhancing the estrogenic effects of Exe. This indicates that Exe modulates both ERα and AR, while Ana and Let act as pure AIs. Thus, this study highlights the potential clinical benefit of combining AR antagonists with Exe and discourages the sequential use of Exe as second-line therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer.

Androgen Receptor is Expressed in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND

Androgen receptor (AR) expression is a potential therapeutic target in breast cancer (BC) as it is frequently expressed in the luminal A and B subtypes and in approximately one third of basal-like cancers. As AR-positive BC displays a distinct biological behavior, we aimed to analyze AR expression in the particular context of BC brain metastases (BM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed BC BM treated with neurosurgical resection were identified from the Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry and clinical data including patient characteristics, biological tumor subtypes and overall survival were obtained by retrospective chart review. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimen containing BM tissue were retrieved from the Neuro-Biobank. Immunohistochemical staining of AR was performed and AR expression in the tumor-cell nucleus was evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven BM samples from 57 individual patients with BC were available for this analysis. AR expression of ≥1% tumor cells was evident in 20/57 (35.1%) BM specimens; the median AR-expression rate was 10% (range: 1% to 60%). AR expression was observed in 11/21 (52.4%) BM of the luminal/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative subtype, 3/13 (23.1%) of the luminal/HER2-positive subtype, 2/7 (28.6%) of the HER2-positive subtype and 4/16 (25.0%) of the triple-negative subtype (P=0.247). Median survival from diagnosis of BM was 10 months (range: 0 to 104 mo) in the entire cohort. No significant association of overall survival and AR expression ≥1% was observed (15 vs. 13 mo; P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

AR is expressed in more than one third of BC BM with the highest rates among the luminal/HER2-negative BC subtype and may therefore be a potential prognostic and predictive biomarker in this particular BC population.

A Phase II Study Evaluating Orteronel, an Inhibitor of Androgen Biosynthesis, in Patients With Androgen Receptor (AR)-Expressing Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)

BACKGROUND

AR is a targetable pathway with AR modulation inhibiting estrogen- and androgen-mediated cell proliferation. Orteronel is an oral, selective, nonsteroidal inhibitor of 17, 20-lyase, a key enzyme in androgen biosynthesis. This study evaluated single-agent orteronel in AR+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS

Male/female patients with AR+ MBC were grouped in Cohort 1: AR+ TNBC with l-3 prior chemotherapy regimens or Cohort 2: AR+ HR+ (estrogen [ER+]/ progesterone receptor [PR+] positive) HER2+/- with 1 to 3 prior hormonal and at least 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. Patients with HER2+ MBC must have received at least 2 lines of HER2-targeted therapy. Orteronel was administered at 300 mg BID; response rate was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled (Cohort 1, n = 26 and Cohort 2, n = 44). Median treatment duration was 7.1 weeks. Seven patients were on treatment for ≥6 months. One of the 21 evaluated patients in Cohort 1 (4.8%) had an objective response. In Cohort 2, none of the first 23 patients to be evaluated had a response and accrual was stopped. Median progression-free and overall survival were 1.8 and 8.3 months, respectively. Toxicities were predominantly Grade 1 or 2 nausea/vomiting (36%) and fatigue (31%). Grade 3 or 4 events in ≥5% of patients included increased amylase/lipase (10%) and hypertension (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Orteronel demonstrated limited clinical activity in heavily pre-treated AR+ MBC. Further development of orteronel in MBC is not recommended. Further efforts to validate the AR as a therapeutic target should focus on identifying new markers predictive of sensitivity to AR-targeted agents.

Roles and Mechanisms of Deubiquitinases (DUBs) in Breast Cancer Progression and Targeted Drug Discovery

Deubiquitinase (DUB) is an essential component in the ubiquitin—proteasome system (UPS) by removing ubiquitin chains from substrates, thus modulating the expression, activity, and localization of many proteins that contribute to tumor development and progression. DUBs have emerged as promising prognostic indicators and drug targets. DUBs have shown significant roles in regulating breast cancer growth, metastasis, resistance to current therapies, and several canonical oncogenic signaling pathways. In addition, specific DUB inhibitors have been identified and are expected to benefit breast cancer patients in the future. Here, we review current knowledge about the effects and molecular mechanisms of DUBs in breast cancer, providing novel insight into treatments of breast cancer-targeting DUBs.

Intrinsic Subtypes and Androgen Receptor Gene Expression in Primary Breast Cancer. A Meta-Analysis

The androgen receptor (AR) is frequently expressed in breast cancer (BC), but its association with clinical and biological parameters of BC patients remains unclear. Here, we investigated the association of AR gene expression according to intrinsic BC subtypes by meta-analysis of large-scale microarray transcriptomic datasets. Sixty-two datasets including 10315 BC patients were used in the meta-analyses. Interestingly, AR mRNA level is significantly increased in patients categorized with less aggressive intrinsic molecular subtypes including, Luminal A compared to Basal-like (standardized mean difference, SMD: 2.12; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.88 to 2.35; p < 0.001) or when comparing Luminal B to Basal-like (SMD: 1.53; CI: 1.33 to 1.72; p < 0.001). The same trend was observed when analyses were performed using immunohistochemistry-based surrogate subtypes. Consistently, the AR mRNA expression was higher in patients with low histological grade (p < 0.001). Furthermore, our data revealed higher levels of AR mRNA in BC patients expressing either estrogen or progesterone receptors (p < 0.001). Together, our findings indicate that high mRNA levels of AR are associated with BC subgroups with the less aggressive clinical features.

The importance of androgen receptors in breast cancer

Background and aim

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women worldwide, and one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in females. For the breast malignant tumors there are numerous targeted therapies, depending on the receptors expressed. Regulating the process of epithelial-mesenchyme transcription, the steroid nuclear receptors are important in invasion and progression of BC cells. Till now, it is known that androgen receptor (AR) is present in about 60-80% of BC cells but, unfortunately, there is no targeted therapy available yet.

Methods

We revised the recent literature that included the AR mechanism of action in patients diagnosed with breast cancer, the preclinical, retrospective and clinical studies and the aspects related to the prognosis of these patients, depending on the molecular subtype.

Results

A total of 12 articles were eligible for this review. AR positivity was assessed using immunohistochemistry. Herein, neither 1 nor 10% cut-points were robustly prognostic. AR was an independent prognostic marker of BC outcome, especially in triple negative BC group.

Conclusion

AR is a potential targeted pathway which can improve the prognostic of AR positive patients with BC. Further preclinical and clinical studies are necessary to clarify the mechanism of action and to establish the drugs which can be used, either alone or in combination.

A First-in-Human Phase 1 Study of a Novel Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator (SARM), RAD140, in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

This first-in-human, phase 1 study aimed to characterize the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and antitumor activity of RAD140, an oral selective androgen receptor (AR) modulator (SARM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This dose-escalation study with a 3 + 3 design and PK expansion cohort enrolled postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Serum sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were used as surrogate markers of AR engagement.

RESULTS

Twenty-two (21 AR+) heavily pretreated mBC patients were enrolled. Dose levels included 50 mg (n = 6), 100 mg (n = 13), and 150 mg (n = 3) once daily (QD). Most frequent (> 10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were elevated AST (59.1%), ALT (45.5%), and total blood bilirubin (27.3%), and vomiting, dehydration, and decreased appetite and weight (27.3% each). Grade 3/4 TEAEs occurred in 16 (72.7%) patients and included elevations in AST/ALT and hypophosphatemia (22.7% each). Treatment-related TEAEs occurred in 17 per 22 patients (77.3%); 7 (31.8%) were Grade 3; none were Grade 4. The half-life (t_1/2) of 44.7 hours supported QD dosing. At the MTD of 100 mg/day, 1 patient with an ESR1 mutation at baseline had a partial response. Overall, clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks was 18.2%, and median progression-free survival was 2.3 months. SHBG decreased in 18 per 18 patients, and PSA increased in 16 per 20 patients. Paired baseline and on-treatment tumor biopsies demonstrated AR engagement.

CONCLUSION

RAD140 is a novel oral AR-targeted agent for the treatment of AR+/ER+/HER2- mBC with an acceptable safety profile and preliminary evidence of target engagement and antitumor activity.

Survival patterns of invasive lobular and invasive ductal breast cancer in a large population-based cohort with two decades of follow up

BACKGROUND

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) comprises 8-15 % of all invasive breast cancers and large population-based studies with >10 years of follow-up are rare. Whether ILC has a long-time prognosis different from that of invasive ductal carcinoma, (IDC) remains controversial.

PURPOSE

To investigate the excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR) of patients with ILC and IDC and to correlate survival with clinical parameters in a large population-based cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1989 through 2006, we identified 17,481 patients diagnosed with IDC (n = 14,583) or ILC (n = 2898), younger than 76 years from two Swedish Regional Cancer Registries. Relative survival (RS) during 20 years of follow up was analysed.

RESULTS

ILC was significantly associated with older age, larger tumours, ER positivity and well differentiated tumours. We noticed an improved survival for patients with ILC during the first five years, excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR) 0.64 (CI 95 % 0.53-0.77). This was shifted to a significant decreased survival 10-15 years after diagnosis (EMRR 1.49, CI 95 % 1.16-1.93). After 20 years the relative survival rates were similar, 0.72 for ILC and 0.73 for IDC.

CONCLUSIONS

During the first five years after surgery, the EMRR was lower for patients with ILC as compared to patients with IDC, but during the years 10-15 after surgery, we observed an increased EMRR for patients with ILC as compared to IDC. These EMRR between ILC and IDC were statistically significant but the absolute difference in excess mortality between the two groups was small.

Potential Prospect of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive, difficult-to-treat subtype of cancer with a poor prognosis; there is an urgent need for effective, targeted molecular therapies. The cyclin D/cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6–retinoblastoma protein (Rb) pathway plays a critical role in regulating cell cycle checkpoints, a process which is often disrupted in cancer cells. Selective CDK4/6 inhibitors can prevent retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation by invoking cell cycle arrest in the first growth phase (G1), and may therefore represent an effective treatment option. In this article, we review the molecular mechanisms and therapeutic efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with other targeted therapies for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Three selective CDK4/6 inhibitors have so far received the approval of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) breast cancer. Trilaciclib, a small molecule short-acting inhibitor of CDK4/6, has also been approved recently for people with small cell lung cancer, and is also expected to be clinically effective against breast cancer. Although the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with triple-negative breast cancer remains uncertain, their use in conjunction with other targeted therapies may improve outcomes and is therefore currently being explored. Identifying biomarkers for response or resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment may optimize the personalization of treatment strategies for this disease. Ongoing and future clinical trials and biomarker studies will shed further light on these topics, and help to realize the full potential of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment in triple-negative breast cancer.

Androgen receptor expression in breast cancer: Implications on prognosis and treatment, a brief review

Approximately 70%-85% of breast cancers express androgen receptors (ARs). The role of AR in breast cancer pathogenesis is currently in exploration. Both androgens and anti-androgens have demonstrated variable inhibitory and stimulatory effects in AR-positive breast cancer depending on estrogen receptor and HER2 co-expression. Androgen signaling pathways interact with other critical cellular pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Ras/Raf/MAPK/ERK, Wnt/β-catenin, and estrogen signaling pathways. Therapeutic exploitation of AR has been the crux of management of prostate cancer for decades. In recent years there has been increasing interest in AR as a novel therapeutic target in breast cancer. There have been many early phase clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of various AR-targeted agents in breast cancer. Some of these studies have shown promising clinical benefits. Studies of biomarkers to identify the patients likely to benefit from AR-targeted therapies are currently in progress. Besides, AR expression may be an important prognostic and predictive marker for breast cancer, which needs to be defined better in future studies.

[Triple-negative breast cancer. Modern molecular genetic concepts and their clinical significance]

Triple negative breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous group of carcinomas that substantially differ in clinical, morphological, and molecular genetic characteristics, tumor response to chemotherapy, and prognosis. These features define triple negative BC today as a special clinical problem that has not yet been completely solved. The review is devoted to the description and systematization of the currently available literature data concerning molecular and genetic features and differences in a fairly significant group of breast carcinomas with a severe, aggressive course and an extremely poor prognosis. The review presents the existing molecular genetic classification of triple negative BC based on the results of studies conducted by M.D. Burstein (2015) and B.D. Lehmann (2016), which determines the presence of 4 tumor-specific subtypes: basal-like type (type 1 and type 2), mesenchymal, and luminal androgen receptor types. The paper reflects the main stages of transformation of the proposed classification over the past decade and an attempt has been make to describe the molecular characteristics of each subtype of these carcinomas.

Causal Associations between Serum Urea and Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Urea is largely derived from the urea cycle reactions through hepatic detoxification of free ammonia and cleared by urination, and the serum urea level is a crucial medical indicator for measuring the kidney function in patients with nephropathy; however, investigative revelations pointing to the serum urea level as a risk factor for cancer are very scarce, and relevant studies are restricted by potential biases. We aimed to explore the causal relationships of the serum urea level with cancer development by focusing on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using the Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. Summary estimates were collected from the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method based on six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The selected SNPs related to the serum urea were obtained from a large genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 13,312 European participants. The summary statistics of RCC were also available from public databases (IARC, n = 5219 cases, n = 8011 controls). Sensitivity analyses included the weighted median and MR-Egger methods. Serum urea was inversely associated with RCC in females (effect = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.24 to 3.01; p = 0.004) but exhibited null association with RCC in males, breast cancer (BRCA) in both genders and prostate cancer (PCa) in males. Similar conclusions were also drawn from the weighted median and MR-Egger. These findings reveal an intriguing link between serum urea and cancer risks for the very first time. Without ambiguity, the serum urea is causatively related to RCC specifically in females, although the mechanism(s) by which urea is involved in RCC development remains to be experimentally/clinically investigated. Our studies may well provide novel insights for RCC diagnosis, intervention and/or therapy.

Activity of Combined Androgen Receptor Antagonism and Cell Cycle Inhibition in Androgen Receptor Positive Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype, with a peak recurrence rate within the first few years after diagnosis. Few targeted therapies are available to treat this breast cancer subtype, defined by the lack of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor and without amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Although cell cycle cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors are approved for treatment of ER-positive (ER⁺) breast cancer, they have not proven effective as monotherapy in patients with TNBC. The androgen receptor (AR) has emerged as a therapeutic target in a subset of TNBCs and with significant clinical benefit observed in multiple trials. The purpose of this study was to investigate the preclinical activity of the CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, in combination with an agent that targets both androgen biosynthesis and AR activity, seviteronel, using TNBC cell lines expressing high AR, cell line xenografts, and an AR-positive (AR⁺), androgen-responsive TNBC patient-derived xenograft (PDX). Single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrated heterogeneity in AR levels, even in a highly AR⁺ cell line, and identified cell cycle pathway activation in AR^High- versus AR^Low-expressing cells. Combination treatment with the cell cycle CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, and seviteronel showed synergy in an AR⁺ TNBC model compared with each drug alone. Although cell cycle inhibitors are FDA approved for use in ER⁺ breast cancer, our studies suggest that they may also be effective in AR⁺ TNBC, perhaps combined with AR-targeted agents.

Correlation between Androgen Receptor Expression and Immunohistochemistry Type as Prognostic Factors in a Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients: Result from a Single-Center, Cross Sectional Study

Background: We investigated the correlation between the androgen receptor (AR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC). AR is expressed in 60–80% of BC. Methods: We evaluated the prognostic values of AR expression among 143 patients with BC for 36 months. The protocol was amended to measure androgen, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression by IHC and the percentage of hormone positive nuclei was quantified. We determined and quantified the Her2/neu status using IHC and in situ hybridization. The methodology consisted in using a Kaplan–Meier analysis and restricted mean survival time up to 36 months. The principal endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: 57% of patients (n = 82) from our group had AR+ (≥ 1%). Patients with AR+ had better OS, 35.50 vs. 33.40 months, with p = 0.027. Moreover, PFS was prolonged for patients AR+, 32.60 vs. 30.50 months, with p = 0.38. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients had lower OS and no difference was observed for PFS. Conclusions: Both OS and PFS were favorably influenced by the presence of AR. TNBC had worse outcomes compared with patients with hormonal or/and Her 2/neu positive disease in terms of OS.

Triple-negative breast cancer: promising prognostic biomarkers currently in development

Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive type of breast cancer associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Validated prognostic and predictive biomarkers are needed to guide treatment decisions and prognostication.Areas covered: In this review, we discuss established and developing prognostic and predictive biomarkers in TNBC and associated emerging and approved therapies. Biomarkers reviewed include epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), androgen receptor, NOTCH signaling, oxidative stress/redox signaling, microRNAs, TP53 mutation, breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 or 2 (BRCA1/2) mutation/homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), NTRK gene fusion, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, immune biomarkers (programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor mutational burden (TMB), neoantigens, defects in DNA mismatch repair proteins (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)), circulating tumor cells/cell-free DNA, novel targets of antibody-drug conjugates, and residual disease.Expert opinion: Biomarker-driven care in the management of TNBC is increasing and has helped expand options for patients diagnosed with this subtype of breast cancer. Research efforts are ongoing to identify additional biomarkers and targeted treatment options with the ultimate goal of improving clinical outcomes and survivorship.

A Positive Feedback Loop Between TGFβ and Androgen Receptor Supports Triple-negative Breast Cancer Anoikis Resistance

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype with peak recurrence as metastatic disease within the first few years of diagnosis. Androgen receptor (AR) expression is increased in anchorage-independent cells in TNBC preclinical models. Both AR knockdown and inhibition lead to reduced TNBC invasion in vitro, reduced tumorigenicity, and less recurrence in vivo in preclinical models. Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) pathway gene signatures also increased during anchorage-independent survival both in vitro and in vivo in preclinical models and in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from patients during emergence of chemo resistant disease. We hypothesized that a positive loop between AR and TGFβ signaling facilitates TNBC anchorage-independent survival. We find that multiple components of the TGFβ pathway, including TGFβ1 and 3, as well as pathway activity measured by nuclear localization and transcriptional activity of phosphorylated Smad3, are enhanced in anchorage-independent conditions. Further, exogenous TGFβ increased AR protein while TGFβ inhibition decreased AR and TNBC viability, particularly under anchorage-independent culture conditions. ChIP-seq experiments revealed AR binding to TGFB1 and SMAD3 regulatory regions in MDA-MB-453 cells. In clinical datasets, TGFB3 and AR positively correlate and high expression of both genes together corresponded to significantly worse recurrence-free and overall survival in both ER-negative and basal-like breast cancer. Finally, inhibiting both AR and TGFβ decreased cell survival, particularly under anchorage-independent conditions. These findings warrant further investigations into whether combined inhibition of AR and TGFβ pathways might decrease metastatic recurrence rates and mortality from TNBC.

Targeted Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

ABSTRACT

Triple-negative breast cancer is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous entity that can be categorized according to histologic, molecular, and clinical subtypes. While chemotherapy remains the backbone of treatment for this disease, there are now several available targeted agents including immunotherapy, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, and most recently a Food and Drug Administration-approved antibody-drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan-hziy as a third-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. We review several actionable targets for triple-negative breast cancer and describe promising nonimmunotherapeutic agents including cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, androgen receptor inhibitors, mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, AKT (also known as protein kinase B) inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates.

Breast Cancer Risk with Progestin Subdermal Implants: A Challenge in Patients Counseling

There is a steady global rise in the use of progestin subdermal implants, where use has increased by more than 20 times in the past two decades. BC risk has been reported with the older progestin only methods such as oral pills, injectables, and intrauterine devices, however, little is known about the risk with subdermal implants. In this review, we aim to update clinicians and researchers on the current evidence to support patient counseling and to inform future research directions. The available evidence of the association between the use of progestin subdermal implants and BC risk is discussed. We provide an overview of the potential role of endogenous progesterone in BC development. The chemical structure and molecular targets of synthetic progestins of relevance are summarized together with the preclinical and clinical evidence on their association with BC risk. We review all studies that investigated the action of the specific progestins included in subdermal implants. As well, we discuss the potential effect of the use of subdermal implants in women at increased BC risk, including carriers of BC susceptibility genetic mutations.

The Impact of Androgen Receptor and Histone Deacetylase 1 Expression on the Prognosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Purpose

Factors associated with invasive recurrence (REC) of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are less known. This study was aimed at identifying better biomarkers to predict the prognosis of DCIS.

Methods

RNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of twenty-four pure DCIS cases was subjected to differential gene expression analysis. The DCIS cases were selected by matching age and estrogen receptor status. Sixteen REC-free and 8 invasive-REC cases with disease-free interval of > 5 years were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was used to validate sixty-one independent pure DCIS cases, including invasive-REC (n = 16) and REC-free (n = 45) cases.

Results

Eight differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were statistically significant (log 2-fold change [FC] < -1 or > 1 and p < 0.001). Less than ½ fold expression of CUL1, androgen receptor (AR), RPS27A, CTNNB1, MAP3K1, PRKACA, GNG12, MGMT genes was observed in the REC group compared to the no evidence of disease group. AR and histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) genes were selected for external validation (AR: log 2-FC - 1.35, p < 0.001, and HDAC1: log 2-FC - 0.774, p < 0.001). External validation showed that the absence of AR and high HDAC1 expression were independent risk factors for invasive REC (hazard ratio [HR], 5.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-20.4; p = 0.023 and HR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.04-9.04; p = 0.042). High nuclear grade 3 was also associated with long-term invasive REC.

Conclusion

Comparative gene expression analysis of pure DCIS revealed 8 DEGs among recurring cases. External validation with IHC suggested that the absence of AR and overexpression of HDAC1 are associated with a greater risk of long-term invasive REC of pure DCIS.

Serial [18F]-FDHT-PET to predict bicalutamide efficacy in patients with androgen receptor positive metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The androgen receptor (AR) is a potential target in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and 16β-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone positron emission tomography ([¹⁸F]-FDHT-PET) can be used for noninvasive visualisation of AR. [¹⁸F]-FDHT uptake reduction during AR-targeting therapy reflects AR occupancy and might be predictive for treatment response. We assessed the feasibility of [¹⁸F]-FDHT-PET to detect changes in AR availability during bicalutamide treatment and correlated these changes with treatment response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with AR + MBC, regardless of oestrogen receptor status, received an [¹⁸F]-FDHT-PET at baseline and after 4-6 weeks bicalutamide treatment. Baseline [¹⁸F]-FDHT uptake was expressed as maximum standardised uptake value. Percentage change in tracer uptake, corrected for background activity (SUV_cor), between baseline and follow-up PET scan (% reduction), was assessed per-patient and lesion. Clinical benefit was determined in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 or clinical evaluation (absence of disease progression for ≥24 weeks).

RESULTS

Baseline [¹⁸F]-FDHT-PET in 21 patients detected 341 of 515 lesions found with standard imaging and 21 new lesions. Follow-up [¹⁸F]-FDHT-PET was evaluable in 17 patients with 349 lesions, showing a decrease in median SUV_cor from 1.3 to 0.7 per-patient and lesion (P < 0.001). Median % reduction per-patient was -45% and per-lesion -39%. In patients with progressive disease (n = 11), median % reduction was -30% versus -53% for patients who showed clinical benefit (in accordance with RECIST (n = 3) or clinical evaluation (n = 3); P = 0.338).

CONCLUSION

In this feasibility study, a bicalutamide-induced reduction in [¹⁸F]-FDHT uptake could be detected by follow-up [¹⁸F]-FDHT-PET in patients with AR + MBC. However, this change could not predict bicalutamide response.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

NCT02697032.

Association Between the HER2 Protein Expression Level and the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Objective

This study aimed to assess the relationship between human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) protein expression level and clinicopathological features of HER2-positive breast cancer, and to analyze whether the expression level of HER2 protein could predict the response to anti-HER2 therapy.

Methods

The present study included 296 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) containing trastuzumab between January 2014 and November 2019. The univariate comparisons of the differences in clinicopathological parameters between different HER2 protein expression groups, and the association between HER2 protein expression level and efficacy of NAC, were made using a X² test or Mann–Whitney U-test. Multivariate analyses of the differences in clinicopathological parameters between different HER2 protein expression groups, and the association between HER2 protein expression level and efficacy of NAC, were performed using logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 110 patients achieved a pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC. The pCR rate was 37.2%. The study showed that patients who were HR-negative, AR-positive, and CK5/6-negative had significantly higher expression level of HER2 protein [odds ratio (OR) = 0.183, P < 0.001; OR = 6.414, P = 0.004; OR = 0.261, P = 0.004, respectively]. Patients with HER2 3+ detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) had significantly higher pCR rates compared with patients with HER2 2+. The HER2 protein expression level might effectively predict the efficacy of NAC in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (OR = 3.520, P = 0.003).

Conclusion

The HER2 protein expression level was related to multiple clinical features in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. For example, hormone receptor, androgen receptor, cytokeratin5/6, and HER2 protein expression level may be used to predict the response to NAC in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and may serve as a predictive factor for NAC efficacy.

A Phase II Clinical Trial of Pembrolizumab and Enobosarm in Patients with Androgen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

LESSONS LEARNED

The combination of enobosarm and pembrolizumab was well tolerated and showed a modest clinical benefit rate of 25% at 16 weeks. Future trials investigating androgen receptor-targeted therapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors are warranted.

BACKGROUND

Luminal androgen receptor is a distinct molecular subtype of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) defined by overexpression of androgen receptor (AR). AR-targeted therapy has shown modest activity in AR-positive (AR+) TNBC. Enobosarm (GTx-024) is a nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) that demonstrates preclinical and clinical activity in AR+ breast cancer. The current study was designed to explore the safety and efficacy of the combination of enobosarm and pembrolizumab in patients with AR+ metastatic TNBC (mTNBC).

METHODS

This study was an open-label phase II study for AR+ (≥10%, 1+ by immunohistochemistry [IHC]) mTNBC. Eligible patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenous (IV) every 3 weeks and enobosarm 18 mg oral daily. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of enobosarm plus pembrolizumab and determine the response rate. Peripheral blood, tumor biopsies, and stool samples were collected for correlative analysis.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped early because of the withdrawal of GTx-024 drug supply. Eighteen patients were enrolled, and 16 were evaluable for responses. Median age was 64 (range 36-81) years. The combination was well tolerated, with only a few grade 3 adverse events: one dry skin, one diarrhea, and one musculoskeletal ache. The responses were 1 of 16 (6%) complete response (CR), 1 of 16 (6%) partial response (PR), 2 of 16 (13%) stable disease (SD), and 12 of 16 (75%) progressive disease (PD). Response rate (RR) was 2 of 16 (13%). Clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 16 weeks was 4 of 16 (25%). Median follow-up was 24.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.5-30.9). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.1) and overall survival (OS) was 25.5 months (95% CI, 10.4-not reached [NR]).

CONCLUSION

The combination of enobosarm and pembrolizumab was well tolerated, with a modest clinical benefit rate of 25% at 16 weeks in heavily pretreated AR+ TNBC without preselected programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). Future clinical trials combining AR-targeted therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for AR+ TNBC warrant investigation.

Ubiquitin-specific protease 14 is a new therapeutic target for the treatment of diseases

Ubiquitin-specific protease 14 (USP14) is a ubiquitin-specific protease that is associated with the proteasome and plays important roles in cellular functions, viral infection, inflammatory responses, neurodegenerative diseases, and tumorigenesis. USP14 appears to have a dual function in regulating intracellular proteolytic degradation. USP14 impedes degradation of ubiquitinated proteins by removing ubiquitin chains from its substrates, while it could promote protein degradation via increasing proteasome activation. Increasing evidence has shown that USP14 is also involved in the regulation of autophagy. Thus, USP14 might act as a key regulator in two major intracellular proteolytic pathways: the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and autophagy. The important roles of USP14 in multiple diseases have encouraged the development of clinically viable USP14 antagonists. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge about the regulation of USP14 expression, activity, and its functions in physiological and pathological processes.

A highly potent PROTAC androgen receptor (AR) degrader ARD-61 effectively inhibits AR-positive breast cancer cell growth in vitro and tumor growth in vivo

The androgen receptor (AR) has been found to be expressed in the majority of human breast cancer and AR antagonists, such as enzalutamide, have shown promising clinical activity in AR-positive (AR+) breast cancer. We have recently reported the discovery of a highly potent PROTAC AR degrader, ARD-61. In this study, we evaluated ARD-61 for its therapeutic potential and mechanism of action in breast cancer models in vitro and in vivo. ARD-61 potently and effectively induces AR degradation in AR+ breast cancer cell lines and is much more potent than enzalutamide in inhibition of cell growth and induction of cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis. ARD-61 effectively induces complete AR degradation in xenograft tumor tissue and is more effective than enzalutamide in achieving tumor growth inhibition in the MDA-MB-453 xenograft model in mice. Our study provides strong preclinical rationale to develop AR degraders for the treatment of AR+ human breast cancer.

Role of CD44 in breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is among the most prevalent type of malignancy affecting females worldwide. BC is classified into different types according to the status of the expression of receptors such as estrogen receptor (ER), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and progesterone receptor (PR). Androgen receptor (AR) appears to be a promising therapeutic target of BC. Binding of 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) to AR controls the expression of microRNA (miRNA) molecules in BC, consequently, affecting protein expression. One of these proteins is the transmembrane glycoprotein cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44). Remarkably, CD44 is a common marker of cancer stem cells in BC. It functions as a co-receptor for a broad diversity of extracellular matrix ligands. Several ligands, primarily hyaluronic acid (HA), can interact with CD44 and mediate its functions. CD44 promotes a variety of functions independently or in cooperation with other cell-surface receptors through activation of varied signaling pathways like Rho GTPases, Ras-MAPK, and PI3K/AKT pathways to regulate cell adhesion, migration, survival, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In this review, we present the relations between AR, miRNA, and CD44 and their roles in BC.

ARe we there yet? Understanding androgen receptor signaling in breast cancer

The role of androgen receptor (AR) activation and expression is well understood in prostate cancer. In breast cancer, expression and activation of AR is increasingly recognized for its role in cancer development and its importance in promoting cell growth in the presence or absence of estrogen. As both prostate and breast cancers often share a reliance on nuclear hormone signaling, there is increasing appreciation of the overlap between activated cellular pathways in these cancers in response to androgen signaling. Targeting of the androgen receptor as a monotherapy or in combination with other conventional therapies has proven to be an effective clinical strategy for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer, and these therapeutic strategies are increasingly being investigated in breast cancer. This overlap suggests that targeting androgens and AR signaling in other cancer types may also be effective. This manuscript will review the role of AR in various cellular processes that promote tumorigenesis and metastasis, first in prostate cancer and then in breast cancer, as well as discuss ongoing efforts to target AR for the more effective treatment and prevention of cancer, especially breast cancer.

Role of androgen receptor expression in early stage ER+/PgR-/HER2- breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Progesterone receptor (PgR) negative breast cancer (BC) is an aggressive subtype with poor prognosis and reduced response to endocrine treatments. Several studies have suggested that androgen receptor (AR) expression is associated with a favorable tumor biology, longer recurrence free survival (RFS), and overall survival. In the literature no data exist regarding the role of AR expression in early stage estrogen receptor (ER)+/PgR- BCs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of AR expression in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective study in which 208 patients who underwent surgical intervention for ER+/PgR-/Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)- BC were included. The primary objective was to analyze the relationship between AR expression and RFS.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 77 months, 75 patients (36%) had a disease relapse (all sites included). AR expression was significantly higher in patients who did not relapse compared with those who relapsed with an impact on RFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.99, p = 0.025). Patients with AR expression ⩾80% had a lower risk of relapse compared with those with AR <80% (HR = 0.53, p = 0.008). In addition, breast tumors with higher AR expression had good biological features (low ki67 and nuclear grade) compared with BCs with lower AR expression, at least partly explaining the different outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support the potential prognostic role of AR in patients with ER+/PgR- BCs and may contribute to the identification of subgroups of high-risk patients.

Androgen receptor expression in a Sri Lankan patient cohort with early breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Androgen receptor (AR) expression is emerging as a prognostic biomarker in breast carcinoma (BCa). The study aimed to determine the prevalence of AR expression by immunohistochemical analysis among a cohort of Sri Lankan women with early BCa and to evaluate its association with clinicopathological features including immunohistochemical molecular subtype and early survival.

METHOD

We studied the clinical and pathological features and immunohistochemical profile of 141 women undergoing primary surgery for early BCa, followed by standard adjuvant therapy. AR status was assessed by immunohistochemistry in all cases. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was determined. The relationship between AR expression and clinical and pathological parameters and immunohistochemical molecular subtype was analyzed using Student T test and chi-square tests. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the prognostic impact of AR expression.

RESULTS

AR expression was seen in 40.8%(95%CI 33.10-49.07%) of the BCa study cohort. None of the clinical data studied showed a significant association with the AR status(p > 0.05). Ductal carcinoma in situ(p = 0.003), oestrogen receptor (ER) (p = 0.001) and progesterone receptor (PR) (p = 0.001) positivity and luminal IHC molecular subtype(p = 0.016) were significantly associated with AR-positive status. AR-negative status was significantly associated with tumour necrosis > 50%(p = 0.031), moderate to extensive lymphocytic infiltrate at the tumour margin(p = 0.025) and basal triple negative breast carcinoma(p = 0.016). The mean duration of patient follow-up was 46.70(95% CI 46.495-46.905) months (3.89 years). On univariate analysis, AR-positivity was associated with better OS among ER-positive tumours(p = 0.047), specifically in postmenopausal women (p = 0.030). In ER-negative tumours, AR positivity was associated with worse DFS (p = 0.036). On multivariate analysis, TNM stage and ER/AR status were predictive of survival. ER-positive/AR-positive (ER+/AR+) tumours demonstrated better OS than ER-positive/AR-negative (ER+/AR-) tumours(p = 0.015). ER-negative/AR-positive (ER-/AR+) tumours (p = 0.014) had a worse DFS than ER-negative/AR-negative (ER-/AR-) tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

AR prevalence obtained was low. AR positivity was associated with positivity for ER and PR. On multivariate analysis, apart from TNM stage only ER/AR status were predictive of OS and DFS, with concordant expression of ER/AR demonstrating a better, early survival.

The expression of calpain-1 and androgen receptor in breast cancer and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics: An immunohistochemical retrospective study

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different biological outcome and ability to acquire resistance to therapy. The calpain family of proteases and androgen receptor (AR) are implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis and progression and are potential targets for novel treatment regimens. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of calpain-1 and AR in breast cancer and to correlate their expression with clinicopathological variables and prognosis of patients. In this study we enrolled 219 breast cancer patients with long term follow-up information available. Immunohistochemical methods on a tissue microarray were used to investigate expression of calpain-1 and AR in tumor cells. The expression of calpain-1 and AR both differed significantly between the tumor subtypes of patients (p = 0.002 and p = 0.042 respectively). High calpain-1 expression was associated with patient's age over 50 years (p = 0.005) and positive ER status (p = 0.009), but not with other clinicopathological variables. Women with AR negative breast cancers were more likely to be older (p = 0.016), to have bigger tumors (p = 0.032), higher stage of the disease (p = 0.026), presence of exulceration (p = 0.017), negative ER status (p = 0.007) and higher Ki-67 proliferative index (p = 0.027). Calpain-1 expression was not associated with breast cancer specific overall survival in the total cohort of patients, however low calpain-1 expression was associated with adverse survival (p = 0.018) in triple negative subgroup of patients. Low calpain-1 expression was also associated with significantly shorter 5-year disease-free survival in total cohort of patients (p = 0.03). AR status was not associated with overall and disease-free survival of patients. This study has demonstrated that the expression of calpain-1 and androgen receptors are associated with important clinicopathological variables. The expression of calpain-1 was associated with improved disease-free survival of all analyzed patients and with improved overall survival of triple negative breast cancer patients.

Clinicopathological Relevance and Prognostic Value of Androgen Receptor in Mammary Paget's Disease with Underlying Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Mammary Paget's disease (MPD) is a rare cutaneous manifestation. Epidemiologically, more than half of the MPD patients concurrently have underlying invasive ductal carcinoma (MPD-IDC), and their prognosis remains poor despite multimodal treatments of breast cancer have markedly improved patients' survival. Accordingly, it is crucial to seek out novel therapeutic targets of MPD-IDC. As an emerging biological marker, the value of androgen receptor (AR) in MPD-IDC is inconsistent. Our objectives were to investigate the associations between AR and clinicopathological factors, and to explore its prognostic value in MPD-IDC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 103 MPD-IDC patients, and immunohistochemical staining was used to determine their AR statuses.

RESULTS

AR was expressed in 44 patients (42.7%), and AR expression was significantly correlated with body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.038) and axillary lymph node (ALN) status (p = 0.025). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that AR positivity was significantly associated with better overall survival (OS) in MPD-IDC patients (p = 0.019) and estrogen receptor-negative MPD-IDC patients (p = 0.039). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that AR was not an independent prognostic indicator of disease-free survival (DFS) or OS in MPD-IDC patients (p = 0.395 and p = 0.073, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to AR-negative tumors, patients with AR-positive ones were more likely to have lower BMI, no ALN metastasis, and better OS. AR-targeted treatments for MPD-IDC may add to existing therapeutic approaches to improve their effectiveness.

Androgen Receptor Expression and Breast Cancer Survival: Results From the Nurses' Health Studies

BACKGROUND

Hormone receptor signaling is critical in the progression of breast cancers, although the role of the androgen receptor (AR) remains unclear, particularly for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors. This study assessed AR protein expression as a prognostic marker for breast cancer mortality.

METHODS

This study included 4147 pre- and postmenopausal women with invasive breast cancer from the Nurses' Health Study (diagnosed 1976-2008) and Nurses' Health Study II (1989-2008) cohorts. AR protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and scored through pathologist review and as a digitally quantified continuous measure. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of breast cancer mortality were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for patient, tumor, and treatment covariates.

RESULTS

Over a median 16.5 years of follow-up, there were 806 deaths due to breast cancer. In the 7 years following diagnosis, AR expression was associated with a 27% reduction in breast cancer mortality overall (multivariable HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.91) a 47% reduction for ER+ cancers (HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.69), and a 62% increase for ER- cancers (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.18 to 2.22) (P heterogeneity < .001). A log-linear association was observed between AR expression and breast cancer mortality among ER- cancers (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.26 per each 10% increase in AR), although no log-linear association was observed among ER+ cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

AR expression was associated with improved prognosis in ER+ tumors and worse prognosis in ER- tumors in the first 5-10 years postdiagnosis. These findings support the continued evaluation of AR-targeted therapies for AR+/ER- breast cancers.

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Established and emerging treatments

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients tend to have a poor overall survival. The primary goals of treatment focus on palliation of symptoms and improvement in overall survival (OS). Single-agent sequential chemotherapy with anthracycline or taxane has remained the cornerstone of treatment for many years. The FDA has approved newer agents such as poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors upfront in germline BRCA (gBRCA) 1/2 mutation carriers; atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel combination frontline in patients with PD-L1 expression > 1%; and sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), an antibody-drug conjugate in heavily pretreated mTNBC patients.

The Clinical Importance of Androgen Receptor Status in Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Turkish Patients with Local and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate whether androgen receptor (AR) status affects neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in stage II and III Turkish breast cancer patients.

METHODS

The histological response for breast and axilla was assessed according to the Miller-Payne grading system. In light microscopy, nuclear staining in tumor cells was evaluated, and nuclear staining above 1% was accepted as positive for AR expression. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the intensity of AR staining: low, moderate, and high.

RESULTS

In total, 71 women with breast cancer were included in the study. In univariate analysis, age, menopause status, tumor diameter, stage, histological grade, Ki-67, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status were tested to determine which of these factors were associated with >90% responsiveness. AR negativity was found to be the only statistically significant factor. In multivariate analysis, AR positivity at each intensity was found to be the single important factor affecting decreasing pathologic response in patients receiving NACT for breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that AR positivity is associated with poor response to NACT in Turkish breast cancer patients and that AR positivity is independent of stage, hormone receptor status, HER-2 status, and disease stage.

Salivary gland-type mammary carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis: A case report and clinicopathological review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Microglandular adenosis (MGA) is a rare benign proliferative lesion lacking a myoepithelial cell layer; 27% of all reported cases have progressed to invasive carcinoma. Salivary gland-type carcinomas of the breast are also uncommon, representing 2% of all breast cancers. This wide spectrum of neoplasms tends to be triple negative and generally has an excellent prognosis. Given the rarity of salivary gland-type carcinomas of the breast arising from MGA, there are few reports of these cases in literature. As such, there is uncertainty regarding their diagnosis and treatment strategies.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We report the rare case of a 66-year-old woman who presented with a triple negative, invasive carcinoma with salivary gland-type features, arising from MGA. The patient underwent mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy, followed by Taxotere and Cyclophosphamide (TC) chemotherapy and 50 Gy in 25 fractions of radiation to her chest wall. We reviewed the available literature on salivary gland-type breast carcinomas arising from MGA.

DISCUSSION

Despite the generally unfavourable characteristics associated with carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis (MGACA), most patients with MGACA have favourable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present case and reviewed cases are consistent with the literature on MGA, atypical MGA (AMGA), and MGACA. Future study of this rare entity is warranted to establish a consensus surrounding its clinical significance and treatment methods.

An Algorithmic Immunohistochemical Approach to Define Tumor Type and Assign Site of Origin

Immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable complement to an epidemiology and morphology-driven approach to tumor diagnosis and site of origin assignment. This review reflects the state of my current practice, based on 15-years' experience in Pathology and a deep-dive into the literature, always striving to be better equipped to answer the age old questions, "What is it, and where is it from?" The tables and figures in this manuscript are the ones I "pull up on the computer" when I am teaching at the microscope and turn to myself when I am (frequently) stuck. This field is so exciting because I firmly believe that, through the application of next-generation immunohistochemistry, we can provide better answers than ever before. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) broad tumor classification and associated screening markers; (2) the role of cancer epidemiology in determining pretest probability; (3) broad-spectrum epithelial markers; (4) noncanonical expression of broad tumor class screening markers; (5) a morphologic pattern-based approach to poorly to undifferentiated malignant neoplasms; (6) a morphologic and immunohistochemical approach to define 4 main carcinoma types; (7) CK7/CK20 coordinate expression; (8) added value of semiquantitative immunohistochemical stain assessment; algorithmic immunohistochemical approaches to (9) "garden variety" adenocarcinomas presenting in the liver, (10) large polygonal cell adenocarcinomas, (11) the distinction of primary surface ovarian epithelial tumors with mucinous features from metastasis, (12) tumors presenting at alternative anatomic sites, (13) squamous cell carcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms, including (14) the distinction of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, site of origin assignment in (15) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and (16) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and (17) the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; it concludes with (18) a discussion of diagnostic considerations in the broad-spectrum keratin/CD45/S-100-"triple-negative" neoplasm.