Homozygous Tsix mutant mice reveal a sex-ratio distortion and revert to random X-inactivation

Tsix transcription- versus RNA-based mechanisms in Xist repression and epigenetic choice

Recent inquiries have revealed a surprisingly large number (>2500) of naturally occurring antisense transcripts, but their function remains largely undiscovered. A better understanding of antisense mechanisms is clearly needed because of their potentially diverse roles in gene regulation and disease. A well-documented case occurs in X inactivation, the mechanism by which X-linked gene expression is equalized between XX females and XY males. The antisense gene Tsix determines X chromosome choice and represses the noncoding silencer, Xist. In principle, Tsix action may involve RNA, the act of transcription, or local chromatin. Here, we create novel Tsix alleles to distinguish transcription- versus RNA-based mechanisms. When Tsix transcription is terminated before Xist (TsixTRAP), Tsix cannot block Xist upregulation, suggesting the importance of overlapping antisense transcription. To separate the act of transcription from RNA, we knocked in Tsix cDNA in the reverse orientation (Tsix(cDNA)) to restore RNA levels in cis without concurrent transcription across Xist. However, Tsix(cDNA) cannot complement TsixTRAP. Surprisingly, both mutations disrupt choice, indicating that this epigenetic step requires transcription. We conclude that the processed antisense RNA does not act alone and that Tsix function specifically requires antiparallel transcription through Xist. A mechanism of transcription-based feedback regulation is proposed.

Imprinted X-chromosome inactivation: enlightenment from embryos in vivo

There are two forms of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) in the laboratory mouse, random XCI in the fetus and imprinted paternal XCI limited to the extraembryonic tissues supporting the fetal life in utero. Imprinted XCI has been studied extensively because it takes place first in embryogenesis and it may hold clues to the mechanism of control of XCI in general and to the evolution of random' XCI. Classical microscopic and biochemical studies of embryos in vivo provide a basis for interpreting the multifaceted information yielded by various inventive approaches and for planning further experiments.

Antisense regulation in X inactivation and autosomal imprinting

The regulation of epigenetic phenomena by elements encoding antisense RNA's is one of the most rapidly emerging themes in mammalian gene expression. Such regulation is epitomized by X chromosome inactivation (XCI) and autosomal imprinting. In XCI, TSIX serves as an antisense regulator of XIST, the silencer element for XCI which itself makes a non-coding transcript. Numerous antisense transcripts have also been discovered in autosomally imprinted loci, including the IGF2R/AIR locus, the Prader-Willi/Angelman Syndrome (PWS/AS) locus, and the Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS) locus. How these antisense elements regulate XCI and imprinting remains unsolved. However, various structural and functional similarities among them imply the possibility of shared mechanism. Among the most interesting are the antagonistic relationship between sense and antisense loci and the initiation of antisense transcripts within imprinting centers. This article reviews the latest developments in antisense regulation in XCI and autosomal imprinting and speculates on molecular means by which antisense genes can regulate silencing in mammals.

The role of the X chromosome in mammalian extra embryonic development

Accumulating evidence points to the importance of the X chromosome for trophoblast development. In rodents, the extraembryonic cell lineage differs from somatic tissues in that X chromosome inactivation is imprinted, preferentially silencing the paternal X chromosome. As a consequence, trophoblast development is extremely susceptible to deviations from normal X inactivation and is impaired in situations of increased and reduced X-linked gene dosage. Mouse mutants have also shown that maintenance of X chromosome silencing in extraembryonic tissues requires a special set of heterochromatin proteins. Moreover, the X chromosome has been implicated in causing several malformations of the placenta. The observed importance of the X chromosome for placental development can be explained by the presence of many trophoblast-expressed genes, especially in the proximal and central regions. Given that the placenta represents a postzygotic barrier to reproduction, evolutionary constraints may be responsible for the presence of placental genes on the X chromosome that are often co-expressed in brain and testis.

Functional intergenic transcription: a case study of the X-inactivation centre

Long known to be riddled with repetitive elements and regarded as 'junk', intergenic regions in the mammalian genome now appear to be more than incidental spacers between coding sequences. Here, I review the example of Xite, an intergenic region at the X-inactivation centre which was recently shown to regulate the X-chromosome choice decision. Xite contains a series of DNaseI-hypersensitive sites and harbours two intergenic transcription start sites. These intergenic transcription elements act at the onset of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) to bias the selection of the active X. It has been proposed that Xite acts in cis on Tsix by promoting its persistence during XCI. Xite has also been proposed to be a candidate for the X-controlling element, a naturally occurring modifier of XCI ratios in mice and possibly also in humans. It seems likely that intergenic transcription will turn out to be a widespread phenomenon in mammals and that, more importantly, it will emerge as a significant regulatory mechanism for the expression of coding sequences.

Skewing X chromosome choice by modulating sense transcription across the Xist locus

The X-inactive-specific transcript (Xist) locus is a cis-acting switch that regulates X chromosome inactivation in mammals. Over recent years an important goal has been to understand how Xist is regulated at the initiation of X inactivation. Here we report the analysis of a series of targeted mutations at the 5' end of the Xist locus. A number of these mutations were found to cause preferential inactivation, to varying degrees, of the X chromosome bearing the targeted allele in XX heterozygotes. This phenotype is similar to that seen with mutations that ablate Tsix, an antisense RNA initiated 3' of Xist. Interestingly, each of the 5' mutations causing nonrandom X inactivation was found to exhibit ectopic sense transcription in embryonic stem (ES) cells. The level of ectopic transcription was seen to correlate with the degree of X inactivation skewing. Conversely, targeted mutations which did not affect randomness of X inactivation also did not exhibit ectopic sense transcription. These results indicate that X chromosome choice is determined by the balance of Xist sense and antisense transcription prior to the onset of random X inactivation.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization: a new method for determining primary sex ratio in ants

The haplodiploid sex determining system in Hymenoptera, whereby males develop from haploid eggs and females from diploid eggs, allows females to control the primary sex ratio (the proportion of each sex at oviposition) in response to ecological and/or genetic conditions. Surprisingly, primary sex ratio adjustment by queens in eusocial Hymenoptera has been poorly studied, because of difficulties in sexing the eggs laid. Here, we show that fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to accurately determine the sex (haploid or diploid) of eggs, and hence the primary sex ratio, in ants. We first isolated the homologue coding sequences of the abdominal-A gene from 10 species of 8 subfamilies of Formicidae. Our data show that the nucleotide sequence of this gene is highly conserved among the different subfamilies. Second, we used a sequence of 4.5 kbp from this gene as a DNA probe for primary sex ratio determination by FISH. Our results show that this DNA probe hybridizes successfully with its complementary DNA sequence in all ant species tested, and allows reliable determination of the sex of eggs. Our proposed method should greatly facilitate empirical tests of primary sex ratio in ants.

The callipyge locus: evidence for the trans interaction of reciprocally imprinted genes

The callipyge phenotype in sheep is an inherited muscular hypertrophy that affects only heterozygous individuals who receive the CLPG mutation from their father. The CLPG mutation is a single nucleotide substitution in what is probably a long-range control element (LRCE) within the DLK1-GTL2 imprinted domain. Recent results suggest that the unique mode of inheritance of callipyge, referred to as polar overdominance, results from the combination of the cis-effect of the CLPG mutation on the expression levels of genes in the DLK1-GTL2 imprinted domain, and the trans interaction between the products of reciprocally imprinted genes.

Molecular links between X-inactivation and autosomal imprinting: X-inactivation as a driving force for the evolution of imprinting?

In classical Mendelian inheritance, each parent donates a set of chromosomes to its offspring so that maternally and paternally encoded information is expressed equally. The phenomena of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) and autosomal imprinting in mammals violate this dogma of genetic equality. In XCI, one of the two female X chromosomes is silenced to equalize X-linked gene dosage between XX and XY individuals. In genomic imprinting, parental marks determine which of the embryo's two autosomal alleles will be expressed. Although XCI and imprinting appear distinct, molecular evidence now shows that they share a surprising number of features. Among them are cis-acting control centers, long-distance regulation and differential DNA methylation. Perhaps one of the most intriguing similarities between XCI and imprinting has been their association with noncoding and antisense RNAs. Very recent data also suggest the common involvement of histone modifications and chromatin-associated factors such as CTCF. Collectively, the evidence suggests that XCI and genomic imprinting may have a common origin. Here, I hypothesize that the need for X-linked dosage compensation was a major driving force in the evolution of genomic imprinting in mammals. I propose that imprinting was first fixed on the X chromosome for XCI and subsequently acquired by autosomes.