Tiotropium in patients with moderate COPD naive to maintenance therapy: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Effect of Tiotropium on Outcomes in Patients With COPD, Categorized Using the New GOLD Grading System: Results of the UPLIFT® Randomized Controlled Trial

A retrospective analysis of the Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT®) trial data was performed, grading patients by the 2013 Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) severity groups. The number of antibiotics/systemic corticosteroids courses and hospitalizations/emergency department (ED) visits for COPD in the preceding year, baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score were used to grade patients: 357 (6.3%), 1421 (24.9%), 299 (5.2%), and 3636 (63.7%) in Groups A-D, respectively. Mean FEV1 was higher and SGRQ scores lower with tiotropium than usual care (control) in all GOLD groups at all post-baseline time points during treatment. In the control group, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) exacerbation rates per patient per year were highest in Group D (1.01 [0.96, 1.07]), similar in Groups B (0.63 [0.57, 0.69]) and C (0.72 [0.59, 0.87]), and lowest in Group A (0.48 [0.39, 0.59]). Tiotropium significantly prolonged time to first exacerbation versus control in Groups B and D (hazard ratios [95% CI]: 0.79 [0.69, 0.91] and 0.89 [0.82, 0.96]); in Groups A and C, similar effects were observed, reflecting the small size of these groups. The number of exacerbations per patient-year was lower with tiotropium than control in all GOLD groups (rate ratios 0.64, 0.72, 0.91, and 0.89 for Groups A-D; p < 0.005 for all but Group C (p = 0.4978). The incidence rate of major adverse cardiac events was higher in Group D than in Groups A-C but lower within the group in patients treated with tiotropium. In conclusion, tiotropium improved lung function and health status, and reduced exacerbation rates in patients in all GOLD groups.

COPD: early diagnosis and treatment to slow disease progression

AIMS

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is usually a progressive condition. Undiagnosed early-stage disease, particularly in symptomatic patients, is likely to become more severe with time. Hence, prevention or reduction in disease progression is highly relevant. We evaluated the published data and discussed the potential impact of early intervention on the course of COPD.

METHODS

We performed PubMed searches of studies in early or mild COPD, focusing on those relating to lung function decline.

RESULTS

Smoking cessation reduced lung function decline at all stages of COPD, and the earlier the intervention, the greater the impact on lung function. Accumulating data from placebo-controlled trials suggested that long-acting bronchodilators can slow the decline in lung function, as well as reduce exacerbation and mortality rates and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) do not impact lung function in early COPD, and further research is needed on the role of long-acting β2-agonist-ICS combination therapy in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiating treatment early in the course of COPD is likely to slow disease progression and improve HRQoL. Current data support maintenance treatment with a long-acting bronchodilator in this patient group. However, many questions remain unanswered regarding the optimal treatment of mild COPD, and further research is required to develop evidence-based recommendations in this field.

An official European Respiratory Society statement on physical activity in COPD

This European Respiratory Society (ERS) statement provides a comprehensive overview on physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A multidisciplinary Task Force of experts representing the ERS Scientific Group 01.02 "Rehabilitation and Chronic Care" determined the overall scope of this statement through consensus. Focused literature reviews were conducted in key topic areas and the final content of this Statement was agreed upon by all members. The current knowledge regarding physical activity in COPD is presented, including the definition of physical activity, the consequences of physical inactivity on lung function decline and COPD incidence, physical activity assessment, prevalence of physical inactivity in COPD, clinical correlates of physical activity, effects of physical inactivity on hospitalisations and mortality, and treatment strategies to improve physical activity in patients with COPD. This Task Force identified multiple major areas of research that need to be addressed further in the coming years. These include, but are not limited to, the disease-modifying potential of increased physical activity, and to further understand how improvements in exercise capacity, dyspnoea and self-efficacy following interventions may translate into increased physical activity. The Task Force recommends that this ERS statement should be reviewed periodically (e.g. every 5-8 years).