First-in-human Phase 1 open label study of the BET inhibitor ODM-207 in patients with selected solid tumours

Are BET Inhibitors yet Promising Latency-Reversing Agents for HIV-1 Reactivation in AIDS Therapy?

AIDS first emerged decades ago; however, its cure, i.e., eliminating all virus sources, is still unachievable. A critical burden of AIDS therapy is the evasive nature of HIV-1 in face of host immune responses, the so-called "latency." Recently, a promising approach, the "Shock and Kill" strategy, was proposed to eliminate latently HIV-1-infected cell reservoirs. The "Shock and Kill" concept involves two crucial steps: HIV-1 reactivation from its latency stage using a latency-reversing agent (LRA) followed by host immune responses to destroy HIV-1-infected cells in combination with reinforced antiretroviral therapy to kill the progeny virus. Hence, a key challenge is to search for optimal LRAs. Looking at epigenetics of HIV-1 infection, researchers proved that some bromodomains and extra-terminal motif protein inhibitors (BETis) are able to reactivate HIV-1 from latency. However, to date, only a few BETis have shown HIV-1-reactivating functions, and none of them have yet been approved for clinical trial. In this review, we aim to demonstrate the epigenetic roles of BETis in HIV-1 infection and HIV-1-related immune responses. Possible future applications of BETis and their HIV-1-reactivating properties are summarized and discussed.

AR Splicing Variants and Resistance to AR Targeting Agents

Over the past decade, advances in prostate cancer research have led to discovery and development of novel biomarkers and effective treatments. As treatment options diversify, it is critical to further develop and use optimal biomarkers for the purpose of maximizing treatment benefit and minimizing unwanted adverse effects. Because most treatments for prostate cancer target androgen receptor (AR) signaling, aberrations affecting this drug target are likely to emerge following the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and it is conceivable that such aberrations may play a role in drug resistance. Among the many AR aberrations, we and others have been studying androgen receptor splice variants (AR-Vs), especially AR-V7, and have conducted preclinical and clinical studies to develop and validate the clinical utility of AR-V7 as a prognostic and potential predictive biomarker. In this review, we first describe mechanisms of AR-V generation, regulation and their functions from a molecular perspective. We then discuss AR-Vs from a clinical perspective, focusing on the significance of AR-Vs detected in different types of human specimens and AR-Vs as potential therapeutic targets.

Bromodomain and extra-terminal inhibitors-A consensus prioritisation after the Paediatric Strategy Forum for medicinal product development of epigenetic modifiers in children-ACCELERATE

Based on biology and pre-clinical data, bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibitors have at least three potential roles in paediatric malignancies: NUT (nuclear protein in testis) carcinomas, MYC/MYCN-driven cancers and fusion-driven malignancies. However, there are now at least 10 BET inhibitors in development, with a limited relevant paediatric population in which to evaluate these medicinal products. Therefore, a meeting was convened with the specific aim to develop a consensus among relevant biopharmaceutical companies, academic researchers, as well as patient and family advocates, about the development of BET inhibitors, including prioritisation and their specific roles in children. Although BET inhibitors have been in clinical trials in adults since 2012, the first-in-child study (BMS-986158) only opened in 2019. In the future, when there is strong mechanistic rationale or pre-clinical activity of a class of medicinal product in paediatrics, early clinical evaluation with embedded correlative studies of a member of the class should be prioritised and rapidly executed in paediatric populations. There is a strong mechanistic and biological rationale to evaluate BET inhibitors in paediatrics, underpinned by substantial, but not universal, pre-clinical data. However, most pan-BET inhibitors have been challenging to administer in adults, since monotherapy results in only modest anti-tumour activity and provides a narrow therapeutic index due to thrombocytopenia. It was concluded that it is neither scientifically justified nor feasible to undertake simultaneously early clinical trials in paediatrics of all pan-BET inhibitors. However, there is a clinical need for global access to BET inhibitors for patients with NUT carcinoma, a very rare malignancy driven by bromodomain fusions, with proof of concept of clinical benefit in a subset of patients treated with BET inhibitors. Development and regulatory pathway in this indication should include children and adolescents as well as adults. Beyond NUT carcinoma, it was proposed that further clinical development of other pan-BET inhibitors in children should await the results of the first paediatric clinical trial of BMS-986158, unless there is compelling rationale based on the specific agent of interest. BDII-selective inhibitors, central nervous system-penetrant BET inhibitors (e.g. CC-90010), and those dual-targeting BET/p300 bromodomain are of particular interest and warrant further pre-clinical investigation. This meeting emphasised the value of a coordinated and integrated strategy to drug development in paediatric oncology. A multi-stakeholder approach with multiple companies developing a consensus with academic investigators early in the development of a class of compounds, and then engaging regulatory agencies would improve efficiency, productivity, conserve resources and maximise potential benefit for children with cancer.

Pharmacologic Targeting of BET Proteins Attenuates Hyperuricemic Nephropathy in Rats

Hyperuricemia is an independent risk factor for renal damage and promotes the progression of chronic kidney disease. In this study, we investigated the effect of I-BET151, a small-molecule inhibitor targeting the bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) proteins, on the development of hyperuricemic nephropathy (HN), and the mechanisms involved. Expression levels of bromodomain-containing protein 2 and 4, but not 3 were increased in the kidney of rats with HN; administration of I-BET151 effectively prevented renal dysfunction, decreased urine microalbumin, and attenuated renal fibrosis as indicated by reduced activation of renal interstitial fibroblasts and expression of fibronectin and collagen I in HN rats. Mechanistic studies show that I-BET151 treatment inhibited transition of renal epithelial cells to a mesenchymal cell type as evidenced by preservation of E-cadherin and reduction of vimentin expression. This was coincident with reduced expression of TGF-β1 and dephosphorylation of Smad3 and ERK1/2. I-BET151 was also effective in inhibiting phosphorylation of NF-κB, expression of multiple cytokines and chemokines, and infiltration of macrophages to the injured kidney. Although there were increased serum levels of uric acid and xanthine oxidase, an enzyme that catalyzes production of uric acid, and decreased expression of renal organic anion transporter 1 and 3 that promote urate excretion in the model of HN, and reduced expression levels of urine uric acid, I-BET151 treatment did not affect these responses. Collectively, our results indicate that I-BET151 alleviates HN by inhibiting epithelial to mesenchymal transition and inflammation in association with blockade of TGF-β, ERK1/2 and NF-κB signaling.

Safety and Efficacy of Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal Inhibitors for the Treatment of Hematological Malignancies and Solid Tumors: A Systematic Study of Clinical Trials

Background: The upregulated expression of BET proteins is closely associated with the occurrence and development of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. Several BET inhibitors have been developed, and some have been in phase I/II of clinical trials. Here, the safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamics of ten BET inhibitors currently in clinical trials were evaluated.

Methods: We retrieved and reviewed published reports on the clinical trials of twelve BET inhibitors including AZD5153, ABBV-075, BMS-986158, CPI-0610, GSK525762, OTX-015, PLX51107, INCB054329, INCB057643, FT-1101, CC-90010, and ODM-207 for patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors and summarized their published target genes.

Results: In the monotherapy of BET inhibitors, the most common and severe (grade ≥3) hematological adverse events (AEs) are thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia. The most common non-hematological syndromes are diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, dysgeusia, and decreased appetite, while the most severe AE is pneumonia. Additionally, T_max of these BET inhibitors was between 0.5–6 h, but the range for T_1/2 varied significantly. According to published data, the rates of SD, PD, CR and PR were 27.4%, 37.6%, 3.5%, and 5.7%, respectively, which is not very satisfactory. In addition to BRD4, oncogene MYC is another common target gene of these BET inhibitors. Ninety-seven signaling pathways may be regulated by BET inhibitors.

Conclusion: All BET inhibitors reviewed in our study exhibited exposure-dependent thrombocytopenia, which may limit their clinical application. Moreover, further efforts are necessary to explore the optimal dosing schemes and combinations to maximize the efficacy of BET inhibitors.

Bromodomain inhibitors a decade later: a promise unfulfilled?

Over the last decade, bromodomain inhibitors have emerged as a promising class of anticancer drugs. However, the clinical progress of these agents has faced significant obstacles, which precluded their regulatory approval. This editorial will review the challenges and opportunities associated with the development of bromodomain inhibitors.