Adjuvant bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin (BOP) for high-risk stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours: a prospective trial (MRC TE17)

Late rectal and urinary toxicity from conformal, dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a prospective study of 402 patients

This study investigates the rate of late rectal and urinary toxicity from three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for localized prostate cancer. The influence of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (AD) on toxicity rates was also examined. A total of 402 men at Liverpool and Westmead hospitals received radical 3DCRT for localized prostate cancer between 1999 and 2003. Patients received either 70 Gy or 74 Gy, according to their prognostic risk grouping and or date of commencing radiation therapy (RT). Late rectal and urinary toxicity data were collected prospectively using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. The median follow up of this cohort was 43.5 months. At 36 months, the cumulative incidence of >or=grade 2 rectal and urinary toxicities was 6.7 and 17.5%, respectively. Peak prevalence of late urinary toxicity occurred at 36 months (9.5%), although late rectal toxicity was highest at 12 months (2.9%) from completion of 3DCRT. The use of AD did not cause additional late toxicities. Patients receiving 74 Gy did not experience significantly worse toxicities than the group receiving 70 Gy.

Adjuvant treatment in the management of testis-confined germ cell tumours after orchidectomy

Germ cell tumours are highly curable, especially when still at the localized stage, which is the case for most testicular tumours. Various options are available for organ-confined disease; depending on the histological review, patients with clinical stage I seminomas can be offered radiotherapy, surveillance or chemotherapy, whereas those with clinical stage I nonseminomas can be offered retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, surveillance or chemotherapy. As it is unlikely that any of these approaches will have a clear survival advantage, the most appropriate variables to be considered are acute and late side-effects, acceptability and quality of life. In recent years adjuvant chemotherapy has been extensively evaluated in patients with seminoma or nonseminoma. In this review we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the different strategies for treating seminomas and nonseminomas, and their associated prognostic factors, and then consider future developments.

[Testis germ cell tumours: which chemotherapy, for which patients?]

Germ cell tumours of the testis are curable disease. Two different pathological subtypes are observed: seminoma and non-seminoma. Two tumour stages have been defined: the disease limited to the testis and the advanced disease. In the latter group, the prognosis is established by a specific classification based on the level of serum tumour marker and the location of the metastases. The most active first line chemotherapy is a combination of bleomycine, etoposide and cisplatine. Patients with good prognostic factors receive three cycles of this regimen; patients with poor-risk characteristics receive four cycles of the same regimen. The strategy in non-seminoma patients is to give a first-line chemotherapy adapted to the risk factors, then to complete surgical exeresis of all residual disease. Patients with stage I disease may receive two cycles of the same regimen. The strategy for advanced seminoma is to give first-line good-risk chemotherapy followed by a close observation and in several selected cases a surgical removal of all residual disease. Patients with stage I disease may receive one cycle of carboplatin. Salvage chemotherapy is based on the combination of ifosfamide, cisplatine and either vinblastine or paclitaxel.

Management of Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Cancer

The optimal management of patients who have clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors remains controversial. Surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), and chemotherapy with two cycles of bleomycin-etoposide-cisplatin are established treatment options and all are associated with long-term cancer control rates of 97% or greater. Studies have consistently identified the presence of lymphovascular invasion and a predominant component of embryonal carcinoma in the primary tumor as risk factors for occult metastatic disease in these patients. Patients who do not have these risk factors are optimally managed by active surveillance given the low risk for relapse. For patients at high risk for relapse and who are not candidates for surveillance, we believe the evidence supports RPLND over primary chemotherapy.

Differences and commonalities in the management of locally advanced prostate cancer: results from a survey of oncologists and urologists in the UK

OBJECTIVE

To determine the management practices used by UK oncologists and urologists for patients with locally advanced (non-metastatic) prostate cancer.

METHODS

Using a postal questionnaire, 155 practising specialist oncologists and urologists were surveyed in the UK. Their views were sought on a multidisciplinary approach to the management of locally advanced prostate cancer and their current management practices.

RESULTS

Over half of respondents recognized the need for both oncologists and urologists to take the lead in management decisions, but almost as many still expected the sole responsibility to lie within their own speciality. Radical radiotherapy (RT) was considered the current optimum treatment by most respondents, but 22% of urologists thought that radical prostatectomy is optimal. Most responders would use luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists as neoadjuvant and adjuvant to RT but there was significant variation in the favoured duration of treatment of these drugs, and in the dose of RT.

CONCLUSION

This survey suggests that there are still wide variations in the management practices for locally advanced prostate cancer in the UK, and between urologists and oncologists. Improved consensus guidelines are required.

Controversies in the Management of Clinical Stage I Testis Cancer

During the last two decades, definitive primary treatments and surveillance with definitive treatment deferred until relapse have demonstrated 98% to 99% cure rates in patients with stage I testis cancer, and these options have obtained firm positions in standard management. The development of optimal management strategies in various countries were at least partly guided by available surgical expertise in retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the United States, and easy access to reference hospitals in densely populated countries in Western Europe that facilitated close surveillance programs; hence, treatment preferences differ on the two sides of the Atlantic. The success of both approaches is highly dependent on the skills of the practitioner, particularly of surgery and of scrutinized surveillance. As a result, local expertise and familiarity with a chosen modality has strengthened over the years, and investigators have been reluctant to embark on randomized trials designed to compare one modality with another. Such expertise with one particular technique, with the other approach being less familiar territory, has created controversy, because both physicians and patients seek evidence-based data coming from randomized clinical trials on which to make management decisions. Moreover, the reduced risk of relapse resulting from the use of radiotherapy or carboplatin in stage I seminoma and of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in stage I nonseminoma must be balanced against the potential long-term adverse effects in this population of patients with a normal life expectancy. The purpose of this review is to present the currently available data and discuss the merits and the disadvantages of the various approaches, yielding to the possible conclusion that all options appear to be equal in terms of efficacy, but that modality-associated adverse effects differ.

Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer

Testicular cancer is the most common solid tumour in young men, and the treatment of testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT) has been called a success story of medical oncology, germ cell cancer being regarded as the "model of a curable neoplasm". Even with metastatic disease, high cure rates can be achieved: the overall 5-year survival for all stages of TGCT is approximately 80%. Today, elaborate systems for prognostic evaluation for gonadal and extragonadal germ cell tumours facilitate the choice of the most appropriate therapy for individual patients. In doing so, the ultimate goal of treatment is tumour-free survival for any patient with TGCT. This goal has already been reached for >99% of the patients with early-stage tumours, as well as for the majority of patients with advanced disease (56% of patients with metastases are considered to have a good prognosis at the time of diagnosis; the 5-year survival rate for this group is 90%). However, patients with 'intermediate' or 'poor' prognosis at the time of diagnosis, as well as patients with relapsed disease after cisplatin-containing therapy, still have an unsatisfactorily low 5-year survival rate after standard therapy with PEB (cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin) of only 80%, 45-55% and 20-25%, respectively.Therefore, our goals must be (i) to limit acute and chronic toxicity by avoiding overtreatment for patients with localised disease and/or good prognosis with advanced disease; and (ii) to identify patients with poor prognosis and treat them in specialised centres, where not only is optimal interdisciplinary care available but new treatment strategies are being applied. For example, tandem high-dose chemotherapy regimens might be effective in achieving higher cure rates in these patients.

Radiation therapy in the management of locally advanced prostate cancer

Locally advanced prostate cancer generally refers to those patients with clinical stages T3-4 disease. Patients with locally advanced cancer frequently are included in clinical trials that examine treatment for patients at high risk for relapse based on presenting prostate-specific antigen, high Gleason score, or advanced clinical stage. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that men with localized prostate cancer benefit from high-dose radiation therapy delivered with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, or proton beam therapy. Most importantly, neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy have significantly improved outcomes in men with locally advanced or high-risk prostate cancer. Although questions remain regarding the optimal timing and duration of adjuvant hormonal therapy, a combination of long-term androgen deprivation started before radiation therapy and continued for 2 years represents a North American standard of care for this patient population.

Testicular germ-cell cancer

Testicular germ-cell tumours (TGCTs) represent the model of a curable malignancy; sensitive tumour markers, accurate prognostic classification, logical series of management trials, and high cure rates in both seminomas and non-seminomas have enabled a framework of effective cancer therapy. Understanding the molecular biology of TGCT could help improve treatment of other cancers. The typical presentation in young adults means that issues of long-term toxicity become especially important in judging appropriate management. A focus of recent developments has been to tailor aggressiveness of treatment to the severity of the prognosis. Recent changes affect the most common subtypes and include the reduction of chemotherapy for patients who have metastastic non-seminomas and a good prognosis, and alternatives to adjuvant radiotherapy in stage I seminomas. We summarise advances in the understanding and management of TGCT during the past decade.