Allogeneic stem cell transplantation with fludarabine-based, less intensive conditioning regimens as adoptive immunotherapy in advanced Hodgkin's disease

Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation for solid tumors: expanding the application of allogeneic immunotherapy

In the arena of tumor immunology, there is a growing perception that the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) reaction that follows allogeneic stem cell transplantation represents the most potent form of cancer immunotherapy currently in clinical use. While allogeneic stem cell transplantation has become an accepted form of "immunotherapy" for the treatment of hematological malignancies, its efficacy in inducing antitumor effects against nonhematological cancers has, until recently, been largely unexplored. The investigational application of nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (NST) in solid tumors represents the logical consequence of almost 50 years of experimental and clinical research into the immunological basis for the cure of hematological malignancies following allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT). Here we review the historical background, development, and preliminary clinical results of allogeneic stem cell transplantation as immunotherapy for solid tumors.

Tandem transplantation in lymphoma

The majority of poor-risk lymphoma patients are not cured with conventional chemotherapy. There is evidence for the superiority of single high-dose chemotherapy in such patients, but many still die from recurrent disease. Strategies to improve survival in these poor-risk patients include dose-intensification with high-dose chemotherapy and PBPC support, tandem autologous HDC with PBPC support, and autologous followed by non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation. These more aggressive strategies are feasible and tolerable. Whether tandem transplantation will prove more effective than current single high-dose therapy in appropriately selected patients remains to be determined.

Novel approaches to allogeneic stem cell therapy

Traditionally, allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) has involved administration of myeloablative doses of chemotherapy and/or radiation that may cure many patients with haematologic diseases. The high morbidity and mortality associated with the intensive conditioning regimen limits allogeneic SCT to younger and healthier patients. However, it is now known that successful allogeneic SCT is dependent, at least in part, on the antitumour properties of the donor graft independent of the conditioning regimen. This potent 'graft versus tumour' (GVT) effect can now be exploited for clinical benefit. The best evidence of a direct GVT reaction comes from the use of donor leukocyte infusions (DLI). For many patients with relapsed leukaemia after allogeneic SCT, DLI re-establishes complete and durable remissions. This has suggested a novel approach to allogeneic cell therapy (ACT) using non-myeloablative, but immunosuppressive conditioning regimens to permit engraftment of allogeneic stem cells and lymphocytes. Engrafted donor cells would then provide GVT activity in the setting of reduced conditioning regimen toxicity. The ability to minimise toxicity and maximise the immunologic GVT effect will make allogeneic transplantation applicable to patients typically ineligible for conventional allogeneic SCT. Response rates with this strategy have been impressive, although toxicity related to graft versus host disease (GVHD) and other complications remains a concern. Current trials have involved heterogeneous groups of patients using various conditioning regimens. Many issues remain unsettled, including identification of the most appropriate tumour targets and definition of the most effective, least toxic conditioning regimen. In addition, the durability of response is unknown. Nevertheless, the use of non-myeloablative conditioning and ACT may provide a new paradigm for allogeneic cell transplantation and the immunotherapy of cancer.