51
|
Boëda B, Knowles PP, Briggs DC, Murray-Rust J, Soriano E, Garvalov BK, McDonald NQ, Way M. Molecular recognition of the Tes LIM2-3 domains by the actin-related protein Arp7A. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:11543-54. [PMID: 21278383 PMCID: PMC3064208 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m110.171264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2010] [Revised: 12/15/2010] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Actin-related proteins (Arps) are a highly conserved family of proteins that have extensive sequence and structural similarity to actin. All characterized Arps are components of large multimeric complexes associated with chromatin or the cytoskeleton. In addition, the human genome encodes five conserved but largely uncharacterized "orphan" Arps, which appear to be mostly testis-specific. Here we show that Arp7A, which has 43% sequence identity with β-actin, forms a complex with the cytoskeletal proteins Tes and Mena in the subacrosomal layer of round spermatids. The N-terminal 65-residue extension to the actin-like fold of Arp7A interacts directly with Tes. The crystal structure of the 1-65(Arp7A)·LIM2-3(Tes)·EVH1(Mena) complex reveals that residues 28-49 of Arp7A contact the LIM2-3 domains of Tes. Two alanine residues from Arp7A that occupy equivalent apolar pockets in both LIM domains as well as an intervening GPAK linker that binds the LIM2-3 junction are critical for the Arp7A-Tes interaction. Equivalent occupied apolar pockets are also seen in the tandem LIM domain structures of LMO4 and Lhx3 bound to unrelated ligands. Our results indicate that apolar pocket interactions are a common feature of tandem LIM domain interactions, but ligand specificity is principally determined by the linker sequence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Batiste Boëda
- From the Cell Motility and
- the Cell Polarity and Migration Group, CNRS 2582, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris, France, and
| | - Phillip P. Knowles
- Structural Biology Laboratories, Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, United Kingdom
| | - David C. Briggs
- Structural Biology Laboratories, Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, United Kingdom
- the Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Murray-Rust
- Structural Biology Laboratories, Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, United Kingdom
| | - Erika Soriano
- Structural Biology Laboratories, Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, United Kingdom
| | - Boyan K. Garvalov
- the Institute of Neuropathology, Justus Liebig University, Aulweg 123, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Neil Q. McDonald
- Structural Biology Laboratories, Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, United Kingdom
- the Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London and Birkbeck College, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
52
|
Structure of the leukemia oncogene LMO2: implications for the assembly of a hematopoietic transcription factor complex. Blood 2010; 117:2146-56. [PMID: 21076045 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-293357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The LIM only protein 2 (LMO2) is a key regulator of hematopoietic stem cell development whose ectopic expression in T cells leads to the onset of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Through its LIM domains, LMO2 is thought to function as the scaffold for a DNA-binding transcription regulator complex, including the basic helix-loop-helix proteins SCL/TAL1 and E47, the zinc finger protein GATA-1, and LIM-domain interacting protein LDB1. To understand the role of LMO2 in the formation of this complex and ultimately to dissect its function in normal and aberrant hematopoiesis, we solved the crystal structure of LMO2 in complex with the LID domain of LDB1 at 2.4 Å resolution. We observe a largely unstructured LMO2 kept in register by the LID binding both LIM domains. Comparison of independently determined crystal structures of LMO2 reveals large movements around a conserved hinge between the LIM domains. We demonstrate that such conformational flexibility is necessary for binding of LMO2 to its partner protein SCL/TAL1 in vitro and for the function of this complex in vivo. These results, together with molecular docking and analysis of evolutionarily conserved residues, yield the first structural model of the DNA-binding complex containing LMO2, LDB1, SCL/TAL1, and GATA-1.
Collapse
|
53
|
El Omari K, Porcher C, Mancini EJ. Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of a fusion of the LIM domains of LMO2 and the LID domain of Ldb1. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2010; 66:1466-9. [PMID: 21045296 DOI: 10.1107/s1744309110032872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2010] [Accepted: 08/16/2010] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
LMO2 (LIM domain only 2), also known as rhombotin-2, is a transcriptional regulator that is essential for normal haematopoietic development. In malignant haematopoiesis, its ectopic expression in T cells is involved in the pathogenesis of leukaemia. LMO2 contains four zinc-finger domains and binds to the ubiquitous nuclear adaptor protein Ldb1 via the LIM-interaction domain (LID). Together, they act as scaffolding proteins and bridge important haematopoietic transcription factors such as SCL/Tal1, E2A and GATA-1. Solving the structure of the LMO2:Ldb1-LID complex would therefore be a first step towards understanding how haematopoietic specific protein complexes form and would also provide an attractive target for drug development in anticancer therapy, especially for T-cell leukaemia. Here, the expression, purification, crystallization and data collection of a fusion protein consisting of the two LIM domains of LMO2 linked to the LID domain of Ldb1 via a flexible linker is reported. The crystals belonged to space group C2, with unit-cell parameters a = 179.9, b = 51.5, c = 114.7 Å, β = 90.1°, and contained five molecules in the asymmetric unit. Multiple-wavelength anomalous dispersion (MAD) data have been collected at the zinc X-ray absorption edge to a resolution of 2.8 Å and the data were used to solve the structure of the LMO2:Ldb1-LID complex. Refinement and analysis of the electron-density map is in progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamel El Omari
- Division of Structural Biology, The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, England
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
54
|
Wilkinson-White LE, Dastmalchi S, Kwan AH, Ryan DP, Mackay JP, Matthews JM. 1H, 15N and 13C assignments of an intramolecular Lmo2-LIM2/Ldb1-LID complex. BIOMOLECULAR NMR ASSIGNMENTS 2010; 4:203-206. [PMID: 20563763 DOI: 10.1007/s12104-010-9240-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2010] [Accepted: 06/07/2010] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Lmo2 is a LIM-only protein involved in hematopoiesis and the development of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Here we report backbone and side chain NMR assignments for an engineered intramolecular complex of the C-terminal LIM domain from Lmo2 tethered to the LIM interaction domain (LID) from LIM domain binding protein 1 (Ldb1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna E Wilkinson-White
- School of Molecular Bioscience, Building G08, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Axelrod HL, Das D, Abdubek P, Astakhova T, Bakolitsa C, Carlton D, Chen C, Chiu HJ, Clayton T, Deller MC, Duan L, Ellrott K, Farr CL, Feuerhelm J, Grant JC, Grzechnik A, Han GW, Jaroszewski L, Jin KK, Klock HE, Knuth MW, Kozbial P, Krishna SS, Kumar A, Lam WW, Marciano D, McMullan D, Miller MD, Morse AT, Nigoghossian E, Nopakun A, Okach L, Puckett C, Reyes R, Sefcovic N, Tien HJ, Trame CB, van den Bedem H, Weekes D, Wooten T, Xu Q, Hodgson KO, Wooley J, Elsliger MA, Deacon AM, Godzik A, Lesley SA, Wilson IA. Structures of three members of Pfam PF02663 (FmdE) implicated in microbial methanogenesis reveal a conserved α+β core domain and an auxiliary C-terminal treble-clef zinc finger. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2010; 66:1335-46. [PMID: 20944230 PMCID: PMC2954224 DOI: 10.1107/s1744309110020166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2010] [Accepted: 05/27/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Examination of the genomic context for members of the FmdE Pfam family (PF02663), such as the protein encoded by the fmdE gene from the methanogenic archaeon Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, indicates that 13 of them are co-transcribed with genes encoding subunits of molybdenum formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase (EC 1.2.99.5), an enzyme that is involved in microbial methane production. Here, the first crystal structures from PF02663 are described, representing two bacterial and one archaeal species: B8FYU2_DESHY from the anaerobic dehalogenating bacterium Desulfitobacterium hafniense DCB-2, Q2LQ23_SYNAS from the syntrophic bacterium Syntrophus aciditrophicus SB and Q9HJ63_THEAC from the thermoacidophilic archaeon Thermoplasma acidophilum. Two of these proteins, Q9HJ63_THEAC and Q2LQ23_SYNAS, contain two domains: an N-terminal thioredoxin-like α+β core domain (NTD) consisting of a five-stranded, mixed β-sheet flanked by several α-helices and a C-terminal zinc-finger domain (CTD). B8FYU2_DESHY, on the other hand, is composed solely of the NTD. The CTD of Q9HJ63_THEAC and Q2LQ23_SYNAS is best characterized as a treble-clef zinc finger. Two significant structural differences between Q9HJ63_THEAC and Q2LQ23_SYNAS involve their metal binding. First, zinc is bound to the putative active site on the NTD of Q9HJ63_THEAC, but is absent from the NTD of Q2LQ23_SYNAS. Second, whereas the structure of the CTD of Q2LQ23_SYNAS shows four Cys side chains within coordination distance of the Zn atom, the structure of Q9HJ63_THEAC is atypical for a treble-cleft zinc finger in that three Cys side chains and an Asp side chain are within coordination distance of the zinc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert L. Axelrod
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - Debanu Das
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - Polat Abdubek
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Tamara Astakhova
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Constantina Bakolitsa
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Program on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Sanford–Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Dennis Carlton
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Connie Chen
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Hsiu-Ju Chiu
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - Thomas Clayton
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Marc C. Deller
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lian Duan
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Kyle Ellrott
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Carol L. Farr
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Julie Feuerhelm
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Joanna C. Grant
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Anna Grzechnik
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Gye Won Han
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lukasz Jaroszewski
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Program on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Sanford–Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Kevin K. Jin
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - Heath E. Klock
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mark W. Knuth
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Piotr Kozbial
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Program on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Sanford–Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - S. Sri Krishna
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Program on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Sanford–Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Abhinav Kumar
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - Winnie W. Lam
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - David Marciano
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Daniel McMullan
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Therapeutics Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mitchell D. Miller
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - Andrew T. Morse
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Edward Nigoghossian
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Amanda Nopakun
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Linda Okach
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Christina Puckett
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Ron Reyes
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - Natasha Sefcovic
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Program on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Sanford–Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Henry J. Tien
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Christine B. Trame
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - Henry van den Bedem
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - Dana Weekes
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Program on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Sanford–Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Tiffany Wooten
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Qingping Xu
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - Keith O. Hodgson
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Photon Science, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - John Wooley
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Marc-André Elsliger
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ashley M. Deacon
- Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
| | - Adam Godzik
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Program on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Sanford–Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Scott A. Lesley
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Protein Sciences Department, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ian A. Wilson
- Joint Center for Structural Genomics, http://www.jcsg.org, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Cross AJ, Jeffries CM, Trewhella J, Matthews JM. LIM Domain Binding Proteins 1 and 2 Have Different Oligomeric States. J Mol Biol 2010; 399:133-44. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2010] [Revised: 04/01/2010] [Accepted: 04/01/2010] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
57
|
Appert A, Nam CH, Lobato N, Priego E, Miguel RN, Blundell T, Drynan L, Sewell H, Tanaka T, Rabbitts T. Targeting LMO2 with a peptide aptamer establishes a necessary function in overt T-cell neoplasia. Cancer Res 2009; 69:4784-90. [PMID: 19487290 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-4774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
LMO2 is a transcription regulator involved in human T-cell leukemia, including some occurring in X-SCID gene therapy trials, and in B-cell lymphomas and prostate cancer. LMO2 functions in transcription complexes via protein-protein interactions involving two LIM domains and causes a preleukemic T-cell development blockade followed by clonal tumors. Therefore, LMO2 is necessary but not sufficient for overt neoplasias, which must undergo additional mutations before frank malignancy. An open question is the importance of LMO2 in tumor development as opposed to sustaining cancer. We have addressed this using a peptide aptamer that binds to the second LIM domain of the LMO2 protein and disrupts its function. This specificity is mediated by a conserved Cys-Cys motif, which is similar to the zinc-binding LIM domains. The peptide inhibits Lmo2 function in a mouse T-cell tumor transplantation assay by preventing Lmo2-dependent T-cell neoplasia. Lmo2 is, therefore, required for sustained T-cell tumor growth, in addition to its preleukemic effect. Interference with LMO2 complexes is a strategy for controlling LMO2-mediated cancers, and the finger structure of LMO2 is an explicit focus for drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Appert
- Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
58
|
Gadd MS, Langley DB, Guss JM, Matthews JM. Crystallization and diffraction of an Lhx4-Isl2 complex. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2009; 65:151-3. [PMID: 19194008 DOI: 10.1107/s1744309108043431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2008] [Accepted: 12/20/2008] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A stable intramolecular complex comprising the LIM domains of the LIM-homeodomain protein Lhx4 tethered to a peptide region of Isl2 has been engineered, purified and crystallized. The monoclinic crystals belonged to space group P2(1), with unit-cell parameters a = 46.8, b = 88.7, c = 49.9 A, beta = 111.9 degrees, and diffracted to 2.16 A resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan S Gadd
- School of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences, University of Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
59
|
The structural basis of integrin-linked kinase-PINCH interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:20677-82. [PMID: 19074270 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811415106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The heterotrimeric complex between integrin-linked kinase (ILK), PINCH, and parvin is an essential signaling platform, serving as a convergence point for integrin and growth-factor signaling and regulating cell adhesion, spreading, and migration. We report a 1.6-A crystal structure of the ILK ankyrin repeat domain bound to the PINCH1 LIM1 domain, revealing the molecular basis of ILK-PINCH interactions and providing a structural description of this region of ILK. This structure identifies 5 ankyrin repeats in ILK, explains previous deletion mutagenesis data, permits identification of ILK and PINCH1 point mutations that disrupt the interaction, shows how zincs are coordinated by PINCH1 LIM1, and suggests that conformational flexibility and twisting between the 2 zinc fingers within the LIM1 domain may be important for ILK binding. These data provide an atomic-resolution description of a key interaction in the ILK-PINCH-parvin scaffolding complex.
Collapse
|
60
|
Abstract
LMO (LIM-only) and LIM-HD (LIM-homeodomain) proteins form a family of proteins that is required for myriad developmental processes and which can contribute to diseases such as T-cell leukaemia and breast cancer. The four LMO and 12 LIM-HD proteins in mammals are expressed in a combinatorial manner in many cell types, forming a transcriptional ‘LIM code’. The proteins all contain a pair of closely spaced LIM domains near their N-termini that mediate protein–protein interactions, including binding to the ∼30-residue LID (LIM interaction domain) of the essential co-factor protein Ldb1 (LIM domain-binding protein 1). In an attempt to understand the molecular mechanisms behind the LIM code, we have determined the molecular basis of binding of LMO and LIM-HD proteins for Ldb1LID through a series of structural, mutagenic and biophysical studies. These studies provide an explanation for why Ldb1 binds the LIM domains of the LMO/LIM-HD family, but not LIM domains from other proteins. The LMO/LIM-HD family exhibit a range of affinities for Ldb1, which influences the formation of specific functional complexes within cells. We have also identified an additional LIM interaction domain in one of the LIM-HD proteins, Isl1. Despite low sequence similarity to Ldb1LID, this domain binds another LIM-HD protein, Lhx3, in an identical manner to Ldb1LID. Through our and other studies, it is emerging that the multiple layers of competitive binding involving LMO and LIM-HD proteins and their partner proteins contribute significantly to cell fate specification and development.
Collapse
|
61
|
Bingham RJ, Rudiño-Piñera E, Meenan NAG, Schwarz-Linek U, Turkenburg JP, Höök M, Garman EF, Potts JR. Crystal structures of fibronectin-binding sites from Staphylococcus aureus FnBPA in complex with fibronectin domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:12254-8. [PMID: 18713862 PMCID: PMC2518095 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803556105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2008] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus can adhere to and invade endothelial cells by binding to the human protein fibronectin (Fn). FnBPA and FnBPB, cell wall-attached proteins from S. aureus, have multiple, intrinsically disordered, high-affinity binding repeats (FnBRs) for Fn. Here, 30 years after the first report of S. aureus/Fn interactions, we present four crystal structures that together comprise the structures of two complete FnBRs, each in complex with four of the N-terminal modules of Fn. Each approximately 40-residue FnBR forms antiparallel strands along the triple-stranded beta-sheets of four sequential F1 modules ((2-5)F1) with each FnBR/(2-5)F1 interface burying a total surface area of approximately 4,300 A(2). The structures reveal the roles of residues conserved between S. aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes FnBRs and show that there are few linker residues between FnBRs. The ability to form large intermolecular interfaces with relatively few residues has been proposed to be a feature of disordered proteins, and S. aureus/Fn interactions provide an unusual illustration of this efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J. Bingham
- *Department of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, United Kingdom
| | - Enrique Rudiño-Piñera
- Departamento de Medicina Molecular y Bioprocesos, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, P. O. Box 510-3 Cuernavaca, MOR 62271, Mexico
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola A. G. Meenan
- *Department of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, United Kingdom
| | - Ulrich Schwarz-Linek
- Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, United Kingdom
| | - Johan P. Turkenburg
- Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom; and
| | - Magnus Höök
- Center for Extracellular Matrix Biology, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030-3303
| | - Elspeth F. Garman
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer R. Potts
- *Department of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, United Kingdom
- Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom; and
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Schaffar G, Taniguchi J, Brodbeck T, Meyer AH, Schmidt M, Yamashita T, Mueller BK. LIM-only protein 4 interacts directly with the repulsive guidance molecule A receptor Neogenin. J Neurochem 2008; 107:418-31. [PMID: 18702663 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05621.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Repulsive guidance molecule A (RGM A) was recently described as a potent inhibitor of neuroregeneration in a rat spinal cord injury model. The receptor mediating RGM A's repulsive activity was shown to be Neogenin, a member of the Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC) family of netrin receptors. Binding of RGM A to Neogenin induces activation of the small GTPase RhoA and of its effector Rho-kinase by an unknown mechanism. Here we show, that the cytoplasmic tail of Neogenin interacts directly with the transcriptional coactivator LIM domain only 4 (LMO4) in human SH-SY5Y cells, human Ntera neurons, and in embryonic rat cortical neurons. RGM A binding to Neogenin but not binding of Netrin-1, induces release of LMO4 from Neogenin. Down-regulation of LMO4 neutralizes the repulsive activity of RGM A in neuronal cell lines and embryonic rat cortical neurons and prevents RhoA activation. These results show for the first time that an interaction of Neogenin with LMO4 is involved in the RGM A - Neogenin signal transduction pathway for RhoA activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Schaffar
- Neuroscience Research, Abbott GmbH and Company KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
63
|
Drosophila LIM-only is a positive regulator of transcription during thoracic bristle development. Genetics 2008; 179:1989-99. [PMID: 18689881 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.090076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The Drosophila LIM-only (LMO) protein DLMO functions as a negative regulator of transcription during development of the fly wing. Here we report a novel role of DLMO as a positive regulator of transcription during the development of thoracic sensory bristles. We isolated new dlmo mutants, which lack some thoracic dorsocentral (DC) bristles. This phenotype is typical of malfunction of a thoracic multiprotein transcription complex, composed of CHIP, PANNIER (PNR), ACHAETE (AC), and DAUGHTERLESS (DA). Genetic interactions reveal that dlmo synergizes with pnr and ac to promote the development of thoracic DC bristles. Moreover, loss-of-function of dlmo reduces the expression of a reporter target gene of this complex in vivo. Using the GAL4-UAS system we also show that dlmo is spatially expressed where this complex is known to be active. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-pulldown assays showed that DLMO can physically bind CHIP and PNR through either of the two LIM domains of DLMO, suggesting that DLMO might function as part of this transcription complex in vivo. We propose that DLMO exerts its positive effect on DC bristle development by serving as a bridging molecule between components of the thoracic transcription complex.
Collapse
|
64
|
A regulatory network to segregate the identity of neuronal subtypes. Dev Cell 2008; 14:877-89. [PMID: 18539116 DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2007] [Revised: 01/30/2008] [Accepted: 03/31/2008] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Spinal motor neurons (MNs) and V2 interneurons (V2-INs) are specified by two related LIM-complexes, MN-hexamer and V2-tetramer, respectively. Here we show how multiple parallel and complementary feedback loops are integrated to assign these two cell fates accurately. While MN-hexamer response elements (REs) are specific to MN-hexamer, V2-tetramer-REs can bind both LIM-complexes. In embryonic MNs, however, two factors cooperatively suppress the aberrant activation of V2-tetramer-REs. First, LMO4 blocks V2-tetramer assembly. Second, MN-hexamer induces a repressor, Hb9, which binds V2-tetramer-REs and suppresses their activation. V2-INs use a similar approach; V2-tetramer induces a repressor, Chx10, which binds MN-hexamer-REs and blocks their activation. Thus, our study uncovers a regulatory network to segregate related cell fates, which involves reciprocal feedforward gene regulatory loops.
Collapse
|
65
|
Solution structure of the U2 snRNP protein Rds3p reveals a knotted zinc-finger motif. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:9621-6. [PMID: 18621724 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802494105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Rds3p, a component of the U2 snRNP subcomplex SF3b, is essential for pre-mRNA splicing and is extremely well conserved in all eukaryotic species. We report here the solution structure of Rds3p, which reveals an unusual knotted fold unrelated to previously known knotted proteins. Rds3p has a triangular shape with a GATA-like zinc finger at each vertex. Pairs of cysteines contributing to each finger are arranged nonsequentially in a permuted arrangement reminiscent of domain-swapping but which here involves segments of subdomains within a single chain. We suggest that the structure arose through a process of segment swapping after gene duplication. The fingers are connected through beta-strands and loops, forming an overall topology strongly resembling a "triquetra knot." The conservation and surface properties of Rds3p suggest that it functions as a platform for protein assembly within the multiprotein SF3b complex of U2 snRNP. The recombinant protein used for structure determination is biologically active, as it restores splicing activity in a yeast splicing extract depleted of native Rds3p.
Collapse
|
66
|
Implementing the LIM code: the structural basis for cell type-specific assembly of LIM-homeodomain complexes. EMBO J 2008; 27:2018-29. [PMID: 18583962 DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2008.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2008] [Accepted: 06/02/2008] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
LIM-homeodomain (LIM-HD) transcription factors form a combinatorial 'LIM code' that contributes to the specification of cell types. In the ventral spinal cord, the binary LIM homeobox protein 3 (Lhx3)/LIM domain-binding protein 1 (Ldb1) complex specifies the formation of V2 interneurons. The additional expression of islet-1 (Isl1) in adjacent cells instead specifies the formation of motor neurons through assembly of a ternary complex in which Isl1 contacts both Lhx3 and Ldb1, displacing Lhx3 as the binding partner of Ldb1. However, little is known about how this molecular switch occurs. Here, we have identified the 30-residue Lhx3-binding domain on Isl1 (Isl1(LBD)). Although the LIM interaction domain of Ldb1 (Ldb1(LID)) and Isl1(LBD) share low levels of sequence homology, X-ray and NMR structures reveal that they bind Lhx3 in an identical manner, that is, Isl1(LBD) mimics Ldb1(LID). These data provide a structural basis for the formation of cell type-specific protein-protein interactions in which unstructured linear motifs with diverse sequences compete to bind protein partners. The resulting alternate protein complexes can target different genes to regulate key biological events.
Collapse
|
67
|
Hwang M, Gorivodsky M, Kim M, Westphal H, Geum D. The neuronal differentiation potential of Ldb1-null mutant embryonic stem cells is dependent on extrinsic influences. Stem Cells 2008; 26:1490-5. [PMID: 18388304 DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-1099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
LIM-domain binding protein 1 (Ldb1) is a multiadaptor protein that mediates the action of transcription factors, including LIM-homeodomain proteins. To elucidate the functional role of Ldb1 in the neuronal differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells, we have generated Ldb1-null mutant (Ldb1-/-) ES cells and examined neuronal differentiation potentials in vitro using two different neuronal differentiation protocols. When subjected to a five-stage protocol that recapitulates in vivo conditions of neuronal differentiation, wild-type ES cells differentiated into a wide spectrum of neuronal cell types. However, Ldb1-/- ES cells did not differentiate into neuronal cells; instead, they differentiated into sarcomeric alpha-actinin-positive muscle cells. In contrast, when an adherent monolayer culture procedure (which is based on the default mechanism of neural induction and eliminates environmental influences) was applied, both wild-type and Ldb1-/- ES cells differentiated into MAP2-positive mature neurons. Comparison of the results obtained when two different neuronal differentiation protocols were used suggests that Ldb1-/- ES cells have an innate potential to differentiate into neuronal cells, but this potential can be inhibited by environmental influences. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minyoung Hwang
- Graduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
68
|
Ryan DP, Duncan JL, Lee C, Kuchel PW, Matthews JM. Assembly of the oncogenic DNA-binding complex LMO2-Ldb1-TAL1-E12. Proteins 2007; 70:1461-74. [PMID: 17910069 DOI: 10.1002/prot.21638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The nuclear proteins TAL1 (T-cell acute leukaemia protein 1) and LMO2 (LIM-only protein 2) have critical roles in haematopoietic development, but are also often aberrantly activated in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. TAL1 and LMO2 operate within multifactorial protein-DNA complexes that regulate gene expression in the developing blood cell. TAL1 is a tissue-specific basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein that binds bHLH domains of ubiquitous E-proteins, (E12 and E47), to bind E-box (CANNTG) DNA motifs. TAL1(bHLH) also interacts specifically with the LIM domains of LMO2, which in turn bind Ldb1 (LIM-domain binding protein 1). Here we used biophysical methods to characterize the assembly of a five-component complex containing TAL1, LMO2, Ldb1, E12, and DNA. The bHLH domains of TAL1 and E12 alone primarily formed helical homodimers, but together preferentially formed heterodimers, to which LMO2 bound with high affinity (K(A) approximately 10(8) M(-1)). The resulting TAL1/E12/LMO2 complex formed in the presence or absence of DNA, but the different complexes preferentially bound different Ebox-sequences. Our data provide biophysical evidence for a mechanism, by which LMO2 and TAL1 both regulate transcription in normal blood cell development, and synergistically disrupt E2A function in T-cells to promote the onset of leukaemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel P Ryan
- School of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
69
|
Wang N, Lin KK, Lu Z, Lam KS, Newton R, Xu X, Yu Z, Gill GN, Andersen B. The LIM-only factor LMO4 regulates expression of the BMP7 gene through an HDAC2-dependent mechanism, and controls cell proliferation and apoptosis of mammary epithelial cells. Oncogene 2007; 26:6431-41. [PMID: 17452977 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The nuclear LIM-only protein 4 (LMO4) is upregulated in breast cancer, especially estrogen receptor-negative tumors, and its overexpression in mice leads to hyperplasia and tumor formation. Here, we show that deletion of LMO4 in the mammary glands of mice leads to impaired lobuloalveolar development due to decreased epithelial cell proliferation. With the goal of discovering potential LMO4-target genes, we also developed a conditional expression system in MCF-7 cells for both LMO4 and a dominant negative (DN) form of its co-regulator, cofactor of LIM domains (Clim/Ldb/Nli). We then used DNA microarrays to identify genes responsive to LMO4 and DN-Clim upregulation. One of the genes common to both data sets was bone morphogenic protein 7 (BMP7), whose expression is also significantly correlated with LMO4 transcript levels in a large dataset of human breast cancers, suggesting that BMP7 is a bona fide target gene of LMO4 in breast cancer. Inhibition of BMP7 partially blocks the effects of LMO4 on apoptosis, indicating that BMP7 mediates at least some functions of LMO4. Gene transfer studies show that LMO4 regulates the BMP7 promoter, and chromatin immunoprecipitation studies show that LMO4 and its cofactor Clim2 are recruited to the BMP7 promoter. Furthermore, we demonstrate that HDAC2 recruitment to the BMP7 promoter is inhibited by upregulation of LMO4 and that HDAC2 knockdown upregulates the promoter. These studies suggest a novel mechanism of action for LMO4: LMO4, Clim2 and HDAC2 are part of a transcriptional complex, and increased LMO4 levels can disrupt the complex, leading to decreased HDAC2 recruitment and increased promoter activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Wang
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
70
|
Rudiño-Piñera E, Ravelli RBG, Sheldrick GM, Nanao MH, Korostelev VV, Werner JM, Schwarz-Linek U, Potts JR, Garman EF. The solution and crystal structures of a module pair from the Staphylococcus aureus-binding site of human fibronectin--a tale with a twist. J Mol Biol 2007; 368:833-44. [PMID: 17368672 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.02.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2006] [Revised: 02/10/2007] [Accepted: 02/16/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
An important goal of structural studies of modular proteins is to determine the inter-module orientation, which often influences biological function. The N-terminal domain of human fibronectin (Fn) is composed of a string of five type 1 modules (F1). Despite their small size, to date F1 modules have proved intractable to X-ray structure solution, although there are several NMR structures available. Here, we present the first structures (two X-ray models and an NMR-derived model) of the (2)F1(3)F1 module pair, which forms part of the binding site for Fn-binding proteins from pathogenic bacteria. The crystallographic structure determination was aided by the novel technique of UV radiation damage-induced phasing. The individual module structures are very similar in all three models. In the NMR structure and one of the X-ray structures, a similar but smaller interdomain interface than that observed previously for (4)F1(5)F1 is seen. The other X-ray structure has a different interdomain orientation. This work underlines the benefits of combining X-ray and NMR data in the studies of multi-domain proteins.
Collapse
|
71
|
Jeffries CM, Graham SC, Stokes PH, Collyer CA, Guss JM, Matthews JM. Stabilization of a binary protein complex by intein-mediated cyclization. Protein Sci 2006; 15:2612-8. [PMID: 17001033 PMCID: PMC2242402 DOI: 10.1110/ps.062377006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The study of protein-protein interactions can be hampered by the instability of one or more of the protein complex components. In this study, we showed that intein-mediated cyclization can be used to engineer an artificial intramolecular cyclic protein complex between two interacting proteins: the largely unstable LIM-only protein 4 (LMO4) and an unstructured domain of LIM domain binding protein 1 (ldb1). The X-ray structure of the cyclic complex is identical to noncyclized versions of the complex. Chemical and thermal denaturation assays using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence and dynamic light scattering were used to compare the relative stabilities of the cyclized complex, the intermolecular (or free) complex, and two linear versions of the intramolecular complex (in which the interacting domains of LMO4 and ldb1 were fused, via a flexible linker, in either orientation). In terms of resistance to denaturation, the cyclic complex is the most stable variant and the intermolecular complex is the least stable; however, the two linear intramolecular variants show significant differences in stability. These differences appear to be related to the relative contact order (the average distance in sequence between residues that make contacts within a structure) of key binding residues at the interface of the two proteins. Thus, the restriction of the more stable component of a complex may enhance stability to a greater extent than restraining less stable components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cy M Jeffries
- School of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
72
|
Lu CH, Lin YS, Chen YC, Yu CS, Chang SY, Hwang JK. The fragment transformation method to detect the protein structural motifs. Proteins 2006; 63:636-43. [PMID: 16470805 DOI: 10.1002/prot.20904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
To identify functional structural motifs from protein structures of unknown function becomes increasingly important in recent years due to the progress of the structural genomics initiatives. Although certain structural patterns such as the Asp-His-Ser catalytic triad are easy to detect because of their conserved residues and stringently constrained geometry, it is usually more challenging to detect a general structural motifs like, for example, the betabetaalpha-metal binding motif, which has a much more variable conformation and sequence. At present, the identification of these motifs usually relies on manual procedures based on different structure and sequence analysis tools. In this study, we develop a structural alignment algorithm combining both structural and sequence information to identify the local structure motifs. We applied our method to the following examples: the betabetaalpha-metal binding motif and the treble clef motif. The betabetaalpha-metal binding motif plays an important role in nonspecific DNA interactions and cleavage in host defense and apoptosis. The treble clef motif is a zinc-binding motif adaptable to diverse functions such as the binding of nucleic acid and hydrolysis of phosphodiester bonds. Our results are encouraging, indicating that we can effectively identify these structural motifs in an automatic fashion. Our method may provide a useful means for automatic functional annotation through detecting structural motifs associated with particular functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Hao Lu
- Institute of Bioinformatics, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
73
|
Ryan DP, Sunde M, Kwan AHY, Marianayagam NJ, Nancarrow AL, Vanden Hoven RN, Thompson LS, Baca M, Mackay JP, Visvader JE, Matthews JM. Identification of the Key LMO2-binding Determinants on Ldb1. J Mol Biol 2006; 359:66-75. [PMID: 16616188 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.02.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2006] [Revised: 02/27/2006] [Accepted: 02/28/2006] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The overexpression of LIM-only protein 2 (LMO2) in T-cells, as a result of chromosomal translocations, retroviral insertion during gene therapy, or in transgenic mice models, leads to the onset of T-cell leukemias. LMO2 comprises two protein-binding LIM domains that allow LMO2 to interact with multiple protein partners, including LIM domain-binding protein 1 (Ldb1, also known as CLIM2 and NLI), an essential cofactor for LMO proteins. Sequestration of Ldb1 by LMO2 in T-cells may prevent it binding other key partners, such as LMO4. Here, we show using protein engineering and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methodologies that LMO2 binds Ldb1 with a twofold lower affinity than does LMO4. Thus, excess LMO2 rather than an intrinsically higher binding affinity would lead to sequestration of Ldb1. Both LIM domains of LMO2 are required for high-affinity binding to Ldb1 (K(D) = 2.0 x 10(-8) M). However, the first LIM domain of LMO2 is primarily responsible for binding to Ldb1 (K(D) = 2.3 x 10(-7) M), whereas the second LIM domain increases binding by an order of magnitude. We used mutagenesis in combination with yeast two-hybrid analysis, and phage display selection to identify LMO2-binding "hot spots" within Ldb1 that locate to the LIM1-binding region. The delineation of this region reveals some specific differences when compared to the equivalent LMO4:Ldb1 interaction that hold promise for the development of reagents to specifically bind LMO2 in the treatment of leukemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel P Ryan
- School of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
74
|
Biryukova I, Heitzler P. The Drosophila LIM-homeodomain protein Islet antagonizes proneural cell specification in the peripheral nervous system. Dev Biol 2005; 288:559-70. [PMID: 16259974 DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.09.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2005] [Revised: 09/12/2005] [Accepted: 09/18/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The pattern of the external sensory organs (SO) in Drosophila depends on the activity of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcriptional activators Achaete/Scute (Ac/Sc) that are expressed in clusters of cells (pro-neural clusters) and provide the cells with the potential to develop a neural fate. In the mesothorax, the GATA1 transcription factor Pannier (Pnr), together with its cofactor Chip, activates ac/sc genes directly through binding to the dorso-central enhancer (DC) of ac/sc. We identify the LIM-homeo domain (LIM-HD) transcription factor Islet (Isl) by genetic screening and investigate its role in the thoracic pre-patterning. We show that isl loss-of-function mutations result in expanded Ac expression in DC and scutellar (SC) pro-neural clusters and formation of ectopic sensory organs. Overexpression of Isl decreases pro-neural expression and suppresses bristle development. Moreover, Isl is coexpressed with Pnr in the posterior region of the mesothorax. In the DC pro-neural cluster, Isl antagonizes Pnr activity both by dimerization with the DNA-binding domain of Pnr and via competitive inhibition of the Chip-bHLH interaction. We propose that sensory organ pre-patterning relies on the antagonistic activity of individual Chip-binding factors. The differential affinities of these binding-factors and their precise stoichiometry are crucial in specifying pre-patterns within the different pro-neural clusters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inna Biryukova
- Department of Developmental Biology/IGBMC, 1, rue Laurent Fries, BP 10142, 67404 Illkirch CEDEX, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
75
|
Lee C, Nancarrow AL, Bach I, Mackay JP, Matthews JM. 1H, 15N and 13C assignments of an intramolecular Lhx3:ldb1 complex. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2005; 33:198. [PMID: 16331426 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-005-3209-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
|
76
|
Kadrmas JL, Beckerle MC. The LIM domain: from the cytoskeleton to the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004; 5:920-31. [PMID: 15520811 DOI: 10.1038/nrm1499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 569] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
First described 15 years ago as a cysteine-rich sequence that was common to a small group of homeodomain transcription factors, the LIM domain is now recognized as a tandem zinc-finger structure that functions as a modular protein-binding interface. LIM domains are present in many proteins that have diverse cellular roles as regulators of gene expression, cytoarchitecture, cell adhesion, cell motility and signal transduction. An emerging theme is that LIM proteins might function as biosensors that mediate communication between the cytosolic and the nuclear compartments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie L Kadrmas
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and the Department of Biology, University of Utah, 2000 East, Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|