51
|
Elias EV, Quiroga R, Gottig N, Nakanishi H, Nash TE, Neiman A, Lujan HD. Characterization of SNAREs determines the absence of a typical Golgi apparatus in the ancient eukaryote Giardia lamblia. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:35996-6010. [PMID: 18930915 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m806545200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Giardia is a eukaryotic protozoal parasite with unusual characteristics, such as the absence of a morphologically evident Golgi apparatus. Although both constitutive and regulated pathways for protein secretion are evident in Giardia, little is known about the mechanisms involved in vesicular docking and fusion. In higher eukaryotes, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) of the vesicle-associated membrane protein and syntaxin families play essential roles in these processes. In this work we identified and characterized genes for 17 SNAREs in Giardia to define the minimal set of subcellular organelles present during growth and encystation, in particular the presence or not of a Golgi apparatus. Expression and localization of all Giardia SNAREs demonstrate their presence in distinct subcellular compartments, which may represent the extent of the endomembrane system in eukaryotes. Remarkably, Giardia SNAREs, homologous to Golgi SNAREs from other organisms, do not allow the detection of a typical Golgi apparatus in either proliferating or differentiating trophozoites. However, some features of the Golgi, such as the packaging and sorting function, seem to be performed by the endoplasmic reticulum and/or the nuclear envelope. Moreover, depletion of individual genes demonstrated that several SNAREs are essential for viability, whereas others are dispensable. Thus, Giardia requires a smaller number of SNAREs compared with other eukaryotes to accomplish all of the vesicle trafficking events that are critical for the growth and differentiation of this important human pathogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana V Elias
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Cordoba/National Council for Science and Technology, Cordoba CP X5004ASK, Argentina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
52
|
Geumann U, Barysch SV, Hoopmann P, Jahn R, Rizzoli SO. SNARE function is not involved in early endosome docking. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:5327-37. [PMID: 18843044 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e08-05-0457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Docking and fusion of transport vesicles constitute elementary steps in intracellular membrane traffic. While docking is thought to be initiated by Rab-effector complexes, fusion is mediated by SNARE (N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor [NSF] attachment receptor) proteins. However, it has been recently debated whether SNAREs also play a role in the establishment or maintenance of a stably docked state. To address this question, we have investigated the SNARE dependence of docking and fusion of early endosomes, one of the central sorting compartments in the endocytic pathway. A new, fluorescence-based in vitro assay was developed, which allowed us to investigate fusion and docking in parallel. Similar to homotypic fusion, docking of early endosomes is dependent on the presence of ATP and requires physiological temperatures. Unlike fusion, docking is insensitive to the perturbation of SNARE function by means of soluble SNARE motifs, SNARE-specific F(ab) fragments, or by a block of NSF activity. In contrast, as expected, docking is strongly reduced by interfering with the synthesis of phosphatidyl inositol (PI)-3 phosphate, with the function of Rab-GTPases, as well as with early endosomal autoantigen 1 (EEA1), an essential tethering factor. We conclude that docking of early endosomes is independent of SNARE function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulf Geumann
- Department of Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen 37077, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
53
|
Dacks JB, Peden AA, Field MC. Evolution of specificity in the eukaryotic endomembrane system. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2008; 41:330-40. [PMID: 18835459 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2008] [Revised: 08/26/2008] [Accepted: 08/31/2008] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Two hundred years after Darwin's birth, our understanding of genetic mechanisms and cell biology has advanced to a level unimaginable in the 19th century. We now know that eukaryotic cells contain a huge variety of internal compartments, each with their own function, identity and history. For the compartments that together form the membrane-trafficking system, one of the central questions is how that identity is encoded and how it evolved. Here we review the key components involved in membrane-trafficking events, including SNAREs, Rabs, vesicle coats, and tethers and what is known about their evolutionary history. Our current understanding suggests a possible common mechanism by which the membrane-trafficking organelles might have evolved. This model of increased organellar complexity by gene duplication and co-evolution of multiple, interacting, specificity-encoding proteins could well be applicable to other non-endosymbiotic organelles as well. The application of basic evolutionary principles well beyond their original scope has been exceedingly powerful not only in reconstructing the history of cellular compartments, but for medical and applied research as well, and underlines the contributions of Darwin's ideas in modern biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel B Dacks
- The Molteno Building, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
54
|
Holt M, Riedel D, Stein A, Schuette C, Jahn R. Synaptic vesicles are constitutively active fusion machines that function independently of Ca2+. Curr Biol 2008; 18:715-722. [PMID: 18485705 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2007] [Revised: 04/22/2008] [Accepted: 04/22/2008] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In neurons, release of neurotransmitter occurs through the fusion of synaptic vesicles with the plasma membrane. Many proteins required for this process have been identified, with the SNAREs syntaxin 1, SNAP-25, and synaptobrevin thought to constitute the core fusion machinery. However, there is still a large gap between our understanding of individual protein-protein interactions and the functions of these proteins revealed by perturbations in intact synaptic preparations. To bridge this gap, we have used purified synaptic vesicles, together with artificial membranes containing core-constituted SNAREs as reaction partners, in fusion assays. RESULTS By using complementary experimental approaches, we show that synaptic vesicles fuse constitutively, and with high efficiency, with proteoliposomes containing the plasma membrane proteins syntaxin 1 and SNAP-25. Fusion is inhibited by clostridial neurotoxins and involves the formation of SNARE complexes. Despite the presence of endogenous synaptotagmin, Ca(2+) does not enhance fusion, even if phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate is present in the liposome membrane. Rather, fusion kinetics are dominated by the availability of free syntaxin 1/SNAP-25 acceptor sites for synaptobrevin. CONCLUSIONS Synaptic vesicles are constitutively active fusion machines, needing only synaptobrevin for activity. Apparently, the final step in fusion does not involve the regulatory activities of other vesicle constituents, although these may be involved in regulating earlier processes. This is particularly relevant for the calcium-dependent regulation of exocytosis, which, in addition to synaptotagmin, requires other factors not present in the vesicle membrane. The in vitro system described here provides an ideal starting point for unraveling of the molecular details of such regulatory events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Holt
- Department of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, D37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Dietmar Riedel
- Department of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, D37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Alexander Stein
- Department of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, D37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Christina Schuette
- Department of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, D37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Reinhard Jahn
- Department of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, D37077 Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Abstract
Subcellular compartmentalization, cell growth, hormone secretion and neurotransmission require rapid, targeted, and regulated membrane fusion. Fusion entails extensive lipid rearrangements by two apposed (docked) membrane vesicles, joining their membrane proteins and lipids and mixing their luminal contents without lysis. Fusion of membranes in the secretory pathway involves Rab GTPases; their bound ‘effector’ proteins, which mediate downstream steps; SNARE proteins, which can ‘snare’ each other, in cis (bound to one membrane) or in trans (anchored to apposed membranes); and SNARE-associated proteins (SM proteins; NSF or Sec18p; SNAP or Sec17p; and others) cooperating with specific lipids to catalyze fusion. In contrast, mitochondrial and cell-cell fusion events are regulated by and use distinct catalysts.
Collapse
|
56
|
Kloepper TH, Kienle CN, Fasshauer D. SNAREing the basis of multicellularity: consequences of protein family expansion during evolution. Mol Biol Evol 2008; 25:2055-68. [PMID: 18621745 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Vesicle trafficking between intracellular compartments of eukaryotic cells is mediated by conserved protein machineries. In each trafficking step, fusion of the vesicle with the acceptor membrane is driven by a set of distinctive soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins that assemble into tight 4-helix bundle complexes between the fusing membranes. During evolution, about 20 primordial SNARE types were modified independently in different eukaryotic lineages by episodes of duplication and diversification. Here we show that 2 major changes in the SNARE repertoire occurred in the evolution of animals, each reflecting a main overhaul of the endomembrane system. In addition, we found several lineage-specific losses of distinct SNAREs, particularly in nematodes and platyhelminthes. The first major transformation took place during the transition to multicellularity. The primary event that occurred during this transformation was an increase in the numbers of endosomal SNAREs, but the SNARE-related factor lethal giant larvae also emerged. Apparently, enhanced endosomal sorting capabilities were an advantage for early multicellular animals. The second major transformation during the rise of vertebrates resulted in a robust expansion of the secretory set of SNAREs, which may have helped develop a more versatile secretory apparatus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias H Kloepper
- Research Group Structural Biochemistry, Department of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
57
|
Martens S, McMahon HT. Mechanisms of membrane fusion: disparate players and common principles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9:543-56. [DOI: 10.1038/nrm2417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 524] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
58
|
Affiliation(s)
- James A McNew
- Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, 6100 Main Street MS-140, Houston, Texas 77251-1892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Abstract
Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) play a key role in membrane fusion in the secretory pathway. In vitro, SNAREs spontaneously assemble into helical SNARE complexes with the transmembrane domains at the C-terminal end. During fusion, SNAREs are thought to bridge the two membranes and assemble in a zipper-like fashion, pulling the membranes together and initiating fusion. However, it is not clear to what extent SNARE assembly contributes to membrane attachment and membrane fusion. Using the neuronal SNAREs synaptobrevin (VAMP), SNAP-25, and syntaxin as examples, we show here that liposomes containing synaptobrevin firmly attach to planar surfaces containing immobilized syntaxin. Attachment requires the formation of SNARE complexes because it is dependent on the presence of SNAP-25. Binding is competed for by soluble SNARE fragments, with noncognate SNAREs such as endobrevin (VAMP8), VAMP4, and VAMP7 (Ti-VAMP) being effective but less potent in some cases. Furthermore, although SNAP-23 is unable to substitute for SNAP-25 in the attachment assay, it forms complexes of comparable stability and is capable of substituting in liposome fusion assays. Vesicle attachment is initiated by SNARE assembly at the N-terminal end of the helix bundle. We conclude that SNAREs can indeed form stable trans-complexes that result in vesicle attachment if progression to fusion is prevented, further supporting the zipper model of SNARE function.
Collapse
|
60
|
Abstract
SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein-attachment protein receptor) proteins involved in membrane fusion usually contain a conserved alpha-helix (SNARE motif) that is flanked by a C-terminal transmembrane domain. They can be classified into Q-SNARE and R-SNARE based on the structural property of their motifs. Assembly of four SNARE motifs (Qa, b, c and R) is supposed to trigger membrane fusion. We have previously shown that ER (endoplasmic reticulum)-localized syntaxin 18 (Qa) forms a complex with BNIP1 (Qb), p31/Use1 (Qc), Sec22b (R) and several peripheral membrane proteins. In the present study, we examined the interaction of syntaxin 18 with other SNAREs using pulldown assays and CD spectroscopy. We found that the association of syntaxin 18 with Sec22b induces an increase in alpha-helicity of their SNARE motifs, which results in the formation of high-affinity binding sites for BNIP1 and p31. This R-SNARE-dependent Q-SNARE assembly is quite different from the assembly mechanisms of SNAREs localized in organelles other than the ER. The implication of the mechanism of ER SNARE assembly is discussed in the context of the physiological roles of the syntaxin 18 complex.
Collapse
|
61
|
Jun Y, Xu H, Thorngren N, Wickner W. Sec18p and Vam7p remodel trans-SNARE complexes to permit a lipid-anchored R-SNARE to support yeast vacuole fusion. EMBO J 2007; 26:4935-45. [PMID: 18007597 DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2007] [Accepted: 10/15/2007] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Intracellular membrane fusion requires SNARE proteins in a trans-complex, anchored to apposed membranes. Proteoliposome studies have suggested that SNAREs drive fusion by stressing the lipid bilayer via their transmembrane domains (TMDs), and that SNARE complexes require a TMD in each docked membrane to promote fusion. Yeast vacuole fusion is believed to require three Q-SNAREs from one vacuole and the R-SNARE Nyv1p from its fusion partner. In accord with this model, we find that fusion is abolished when the TMD of Nyv1p is replaced by lipid anchors, even though lipid-anchored Nyv1p assembles into trans-SNARE complexes. However, normal fusion is restored by the addition of both Sec18p and the soluble SNARE Vam7p. In restoring fusion, Sec18p promotes the disassembly of trans-SNARE complexes, and Vam7p enhances their assembly. Thus, either the TMD of this R-SNARE is not essential for fusion, and TMD-mediated membrane stress is not the only mode of trans-SNARE complex action, or these SNAREs have more flexibility than heretofore appreciated to form alternate functional complexes that violate the 3Q:1R rule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngsoo Jun
- Department of Biochemistry, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755-3844, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
62
|
Strop P, Kaiser SE, Vrljic M, Brunger AT. The structure of the yeast plasma membrane SNARE complex reveals destabilizing water-filled cavities. J Biol Chem 2007; 283:1113-9. [PMID: 17956869 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m707912200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
SNARE proteins form a complex that leads to membrane fusion between vesicles, organelles, and plasma membrane in all eukaryotic cells. We report the 1.7A resolution structure of the SNARE complex that mediates exocytosis at the plasma membrane in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Similar to its neuronal and endosomal homologues, the S. cerevisiae SNARE complex forms a parallel four-helix bundle in the center of which is an ionic layer. The S. cerevisiae SNARE complex exhibits increased helix bending near the ionic layer, contains water-filled cavities in the complex core, and exhibits reduced thermal stability relative to mammalian SNARE complexes. Mutagenesis experiments suggest that the water-filled cavities contribute to the lower stability of the S. cerevisiae complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel Strop
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
63
|
Kloepper TH, Kienle CN, Fasshauer D. An elaborate classification of SNARE proteins sheds light on the conservation of the eukaryotic endomembrane system. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:3463-71. [PMID: 17596510 PMCID: PMC1951749 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e07-03-0193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2007] [Revised: 06/15/2007] [Accepted: 06/18/2007] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Proteins of the SNARE (soluble N-ethylmalemide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) family are essential for the fusion of transport vesicles with an acceptor membrane. Despite considerable sequence divergence, their mechanism of action is conserved: heterologous sets assemble into membrane-bridging SNARE complexes, in effect driving membrane fusion. Within the cell, distinct functional SNARE units are involved in different trafficking steps. These functional units are conserved across species and probably reflect the conservation of the particular transport step. Here, we have systematically analyzed SNARE sequences from 145 different species and have established a highly accurate classification for all SNARE proteins. Principally, all SNAREs split into four basic types, reflecting their position in the four-helix bundle complex. Among these four basic types, we established 20 SNARE subclasses that probably represent the original repertoire of a eukaryotic cenancestor. This repertoire has been modulated independently in different lines of organisms. Our data are in line with the notion that the ur-eukaryotic cell was already equipped with the various compartments found in contemporary cells. Possibly, the development of these compartments is closely intertwined with episodes of duplication and divergence of a prototypic SNARE unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias H. Kloepper
- *Research Group Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Center for Bioinformatics, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; and
- Research Group Structural Biochemistry, Department of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - C. Nickias Kienle
- *Research Group Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Center for Bioinformatics, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; and
- Research Group Structural Biochemistry, Department of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Dirk Fasshauer
- Research Group Structural Biochemistry, Department of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|