In vivo turnover study demonstrates diminished clearance of lipoprotein(a) in hemodialysis patients

In vivo stable-isotope kinetic study suggests intracellular assembly of lipoprotein(a)

OBJECTIVE

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] consists of apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100) as part of an LDL-like particle and the covalently linked glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. Detailed mechanisms of its biosynthesis, assembly, secretion and catabolism are still poorly understood. To address the Lp(a) assembly mechanism, we studied the in vivo kinetics of apo(a) and apoB-100 from Lp(a) and LDL apoB-100 in nine healthy probands using stable-isotope methodology.

METHODS

The level of isotope enrichment was used to calculate the fractional synthesis rate (FSR), production rate (PR) and retention time (RT) using SAAMII software and multicompartmental modeling.

RESULTS

We observed a similar mean PR for apo(a) (1.15 nmol/kg/d) and apoB-100 (1.31 nmol/kg/d) from Lp(a), which differed significantly from the PR for apoB-100 from LDL (32.6 nmol/kg/d). Accordingly, mean FSR and RT values for Lp(a)-apo(a) were similar to those of Lp(a)-apoB and different from those for LDL-apoB.

CONCLUSION

Two different kinetic apoB pools within Lp(a) and LDL suggest intracellular Lp(a) assembly from apo(a) and newly synthesized LDL.

Evidence-based statin prescription for cardiovascular protection in renal impairment

Dyslipidemia is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular disease in the general population, and the cardioprotective role of statins is well established. However, although cardiovascular disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD), the role of statin therapy is still under investigation. In CKD the atherosclerotic burden is high and pathophysiology of dyslipidemia is complex; however, the majority of large-scale statin trials excluded patients with CKD. Statins could have different effects in the different stages of CKD. Two large trials involving haemodialysis patients showed unfavourable results, whereas in renal transplant subjects as well as in early CKD subjects, statins reduced cardiovascular risk. The studies involving early CKD patients are post-hoc analyses of large trials and they showed that statins are more effective in secondary than in primary prevention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of statins for prevention of cardiovascular events by calculating the number of patients needed to be treated in different interventional trials. We conclude that dyslipidemia is a modifiable cardiovascular risk and statins appear to be an effective treatment especially in the early stages of CKD. Patients on renal replacement therapy could obtain an advantage from this treatment; however, the patient's clinical prognosis should be taken into account when evaluating treatment.

Dyslipidemia associated with chronic kidney disease

Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with impaired renal function. Dyslipidemia has been established as a well-known traditional risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population and it is well known that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) exhibit significant alterations in lipoprotein metabolism. In this review, the pathogenesis and treatment of CKD-induced dyslipidemia are discussed. Studies on lipid abnormalities in predialysis, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients are analyzed. In addition, the results of the studies that tested the effects of the hypolipidemic drugs on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD are reported.

Lipoprotein(a) accelerates atherosclerosis in uremic mice

Uremic patients have increased plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels and elevated risk of cardiovascular disease. Lp(a) is a subfraction of LDL, where apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] is disulfide bound to apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB). Lp(a) binds oxidized phospholipids (OxPL), and uremia increases lipoprotein-associated OxPL. Thus, Lp(a) may be particularly atherogenic in a uremic setting. We therefore investigated whether transgenic (Tg) expression of human Lp(a) increases atherosclerosis in uremic mice. Moderate uremia was induced by 5/6 nephrectomy (NX) in Tg mice with expression of human apo(a) (n = 19), human apoB-100 (n = 20), or human apo(a) + human apoB [Lp(a)] (n = 15), and in wild-type (WT) controls (n = 21). The uremic mice received a high-fat diet, and aortic atherosclerosis was examined 35 weeks later. LDL-cholesterol was increased in apoB-Tg and Lp(a)-Tg mice, but it was normal in apo(a)-Tg and WT mice. Uremia did not result in increased plasma apo(a) or Lp(a). Mean atherosclerotic plaque area in the aortic root was increased 1.8-fold in apo(a)-Tg (P = 0.025) and 3.3-fold (P = 0.0001) in Lp(a)-Tg mice compared with WT mice. Plasma OxPL, as detected with the E06 antibody, was associated with both apo(a) and Lp(a). In conclusion, expression of apo(a) or Lp(a) increased uremia-induced atherosclerosis. Binding of OxPL on apo(a) and Lp(a) may contribute to the atherogenicity of Lp(a) in uremia.

Cardiovascular complications in diabetic kidney disease

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Due to an explosion in the incidence and the prevalence of Type 2 DM, the burden of CKD is expected to increase proportionately. Both DM and CKD are associated with a high incidence of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, and it is important to understand the unique nature of CV disease in patients with the combination of these two conditions. In this report, we review the traditional and nontraditional risk factors that underlie the high risk of CV disease in this population, with a particular focus on vascular calcification, mineral metabolism, and therapeutic paradigms for the treatment of cardiovascular disease in this unique and high-risk population.

Lipoprotein(a) and ischemic heart disease--a causal association? A review

The aim of this review is to summarize present evidence of a causal association of lipoprotein(a) with risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Evidence for causality includes reproducible associations of a proposed risk factor with risk of disease in epidemiological studies, evidence from in vitro and animal studies in support of pathophysiological effects of the risk factor, and preferably evidence from randomized clinical trials documenting reduced morbidity in response to interventions targeting the risk factor. Elevated and in particular extreme lipoprotein(a) levels have in prospective studies repeatedly been associated with increased risk of IHD, although results from early studies are inconsistent. Data from in vitro and animal studies implicate lipoprotein(a), consisting of a low density lipoprotein particle covalently bound to the plasminogen-like glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a), in both atherosclerosis and thrombosis, including accumulation of lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic plaques and attenuation of t-PA mediated plasminogen activation. No randomized clinical trial of the effect of lowering lipoprotein(a) levels on IHD prevention has ever been conducted. Lacking evidence from randomized clinical trials, genetic studies, such as Mendelian randomization studies, can also support claims of causality. Levels of lipoprotein(a) are primarily determined by variation in the LPA gene coding for the apolipoprotein(a) moiety of lipoprotein(a), and genetic epidemiologic studies have documented association of LPA copy number variants, influencing levels of lipoprotein(a), with risk of IHD. In conclusion, results from epidemiologic, in vitro, animal, and genetic epidemiologic studies support a causal association of lipoprotein(a) with risk of IHD, while results from randomized clinical trials are presently lacking.

Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in chronic kidney disease

The risk of cardiovascular events and mortality increases as renal function declines although the relative risk of mortality contributed by the standard Framingham risk factors are altered or replaced. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol does not predict mortality but low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides remain risk factors. The lipoproteins within each class are shifted to smaller, more dense isoforms. The accumulation of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins, including lipoprotein(a) results primarily from decreased clearance rather than from increased synthesis. Lipoprotein(a) levels are also associated with cardiovascular outcome among dialysis patients. Decreased clearance of very low-density lipoprotein and intermediate-density lipoprotein is a result of decreased lipoprotein lipase, structural alterations in the lipoproteins rendering them poorer substrates, and a decrease in receptor number for these proteins. HDL levels are decreased as a result of an increased fractional catabolic rate both among obese patients with normal renal function and among dialysis patients, but the mechanisms responsible for increased HDL fractional catabolic rate may differ. In patients with advanced kidney disease, HDL fails to mature normally as a result of decreased lecithin cholesterol ester transfer protein, leaving cholesterol ester-poor, triglyceride-rich HDL(3) and pre-beta HDL. HDL in patients with chronic kidney disease is a less effective antioxidative agent than is HDL from normal subjects because of a decrease in paroxonase activity, allowing the accumulation of oxidized LDL.

Reducing lipids for CV protection in CKD patients-current evidence

Lipid parameters are altered in the earliest stages of primary kidney disease, some even when measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is still normal. The main problem is that routinely measured lipid parameters are deceivingly normal except low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and moderately elevated triglycerides (TGs) (>150 mg per 100 ml). Behind this unimpressive spectrum, serious anomalies are hidden: increased very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and chylomicron remnants, accumulation of delipidated small dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL), post translational modification of lipoproteins, abnormal concentrations of Lp(a) and nonprotective HDL. A routine parameter with some predictive value is the concentration of non-HDL cholesterol. Several of these abnormal lipoprotein particles stimulate cellular free oxygen radical formation which in turn induce inflammation and impact on endothelial function.A bone of contention is the indication for treatment with statins in endstage renal disease. Poor survival is paradoxically predicted by low cholesterol. This appears to be the result of confounding by microinflammation. One controlled interventional study in hemodialysed type 2 diabetics, the 4-D study, failed to show a significant benefit on the primary cardiovascular endpoint. We discuss potential explanations for this 'negative' outcome and the implications for statin treatment.

Lipid abnormalities and cardiovascular risk in renal disease

The recent 4D study failed to provide definitive evidence for benefit of statin use in type 2 diabetics on dialysis. This finding stands in stark contrast to a number of other observations in patients with early stages of chronic kidney disease where substantial benefit of statins had been documented. Here we discuss some potential explanations for the unexpected finding of the 4D study and for the negative association between below average total cholesterol and vascular mortality among dialysis patients. Admittedly, in the absence of definite evidence in dialysis patients, we still conclude that the administration of statins is appropriate in patients with manifest coronary disease.

Kinetic studies of atherogenic lipoproteins in hemodialysis patients: do they tell us more about their pathology?

Patients with chronic kidney disease have one of the highest risks for atherosclerotic complications. Several large epidemiological studies described an opposite association of total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol with cardiovascular complications and total mortality compared to the general population, a circumstance often called "reverse epidemiology." Many factors might contribute to this reversal such as interaction with malnutrition/inflammation, pronounced fluctuations of atherogenic lipoproteins during the course of renal disease, heterogeneity of lipoprotein particles with preponderance of remnant particles, and chemical modification of lipoproteins caused by the uremic environment. A vicious cycle has been suggested in uremia in which the decreased catabolism of atherogenic lipoproteins such as LDL, IDL and Lp(a) leads to their increased plasma residence time and further modification of these lipoproteins by oxidation, carbamylation, and glycation. Using stable isotope techniques, it has been shown recently that the plasma residence time of these particles is more than twice as long in hemodialysis patients as in nonuremic subjects. This reduced catabolism, however, is masked by the decreased production of LDL, resulting in near-normal plasma levels of LDL. The production rate of Lp(a) in hemodialysis patients is similar to that in controls which together with the doubled residence time results in elevated Lp(a) levels. An increased clearance of these altered lipoproteins via the scavenger receptors of macrophages leads to the transformation of macrophages into foam cells in the vascular wall and might contribute to the pronounced risk for cardiovascular complications of these patients. These observations suggest that the real danger of these particles is not reflected by the measured concentrations but by their metabolic qualities.

Effects of renal replacement therapy on plasma lipoprotein(a) levels

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have significantly higher levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] when compared to control populations. Elevated levels of Lp(a) may play a role in the high incidence of cardiovascular disease in ESRD. We conducted a prospective study to test the hypothesis that plasma levels of Lp(a) decline rapidly after renal transplantation proportional to the improvement in renal function, but are not affected by hemodialysis. All adults that initiated hemodialysis or received a renal transplant from our institution during a 10-month period were invited to participate in the study. Lp(a) levels were obtained immediately prior to the initiation of renal replacement therapy. In transplant recipients, repeat Lp(a) measures were done at 3 days, 5 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 4 weeks post-transplant. In hemodialysis patients, repeat Lp(a) measures were done after 3 months. We used a mixed effects model to analyze the effect of time, race and creatinine on Lp(a) after transplant. Lp(a) levels decreased rapidly after renal transplantation. Mean Lp(a) levels at 2 weeks were 35.3% lower than prior to transplantation. Each reduction of 50% in creatinine was associated with a 10.6% reduction in Lp(a) (p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no significant change in Lp(a) after initiation of hemodialysis. The rapid decrease of Lp(a) levels after renal transplantation provides support for a metabolic role of the kidney in Lp(a) catabolism and suggests that the increase in Lp(a) seen in chronic kidney disease is due to loss of functioning renal tissue.

Evidence mounts for a role of the kidney in lipoprotein(a) catabolism

Numerous studies have suggested a role of the kidney in lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) catabolism, but direct evidence is still lacking. Frischmann et al. demonstrate that the marked elevation of Lp(a) observed in hemodialysis patients results from a decrease in Lp(a) clearance rather than an increase in Lp(a) production, consistent with the notion that the kidney degrades Lp(a). More studies are needed to prove the biological relevance.