Human ARF protein interacts with topoisomerase I and stimulates its activity

Activation of human topoisomerase I by protein kinase CK2

The enzymatic studies were performed to reveal a mode of activation of human topoisomerase I by a direct interaction with protein kinase CK2. In the absence of ATP CK2 kinase activated DNA relaxation about twofold. CK2alpha subunit was identified as solely responsible for the stimulation of relaxing activity by CK2 kinase. CK2 activated the relaxation only at the excess of the substrate over topoisomerase I. At the equimolar ratio of the substrate DNA and topoisomerase I the activation was not observed. There was also no effect of CK2 on camptothecin-induced cleavage of DNA by htopo I. These results identify an accelerated movement of topoisomerase I between substrate molecules as a cause of the activation of DNA relaxation by CK2 kinase.

Delineation of the domains required for physical and functional interaction of p14ARF with human topoisomerase I

We recently reported an interaction between the p14(ARF) protein and human topoisomerase I (Topo I) resulting in the stimulation of the relaxation activity of Topo I. Our data showed that the complex between the two proteins was located within the nucleolus. In the present work, we have investigated the regions of p14(ARF) involved in this interaction by using targeted point mutagenesis and deletion mutants. A region encompassing exon 2-encoded sequence was required for physical binding of p14(ARF) to Topo I as well as for stimulatory activity of the enzyme. Exon 1 beta-encoded segment was not implicated in the interaction. Moreover, among p14(ARF) point mutants selected for their high conservation among different mammalian species, mutant p14(ARF) (RR87, 88AA) did not stimulate Topo I in spite of its association with the enzyme, suggesting its direct implication in the functional activity of ARF. In contrast, one mutant, p14(ARF) (R71A), was more efficient than wild-type protein to activate Topo I, suggesting that this residue is a key element to modulate Topo I activity. Finally, only ARF-Topo I complexes containing p14(ARF) exon 2 segment were found to be localized in the nucleolus, suggesting that this subnuclear location is linked to the biological function of the ARF-Topo I complex.

Association of p14ARF with the p120E4F transcriptional repressor enhances cell cycle inhibition

The p14(ARF) tumor suppressor is a key regulator of cellular proliferation and is frequently inactivated in human cancer. This tumor suppressor functions in the p53 and pRb cell cycle regulatory pathways and can effectively activate both pathways to induce growth arrest or cell death. We now report that p14(ARF) forms a complex with the E1A-regulated transcriptional repressor, p120(E4F). p120(E4F) contacts p14(ARF) and p53 to form a ternary complex in vivo and enhances p14(ARF)-induced G(2) cell cycle arrest in a p53-dependent manner. We suggest that the interaction of p14(ARF) and p120(E4F) forms an important link between the p14(ARF) and p53 tumor suppressor proteins, both of which exhibit enhanced cell cycle inhibitory activity in the presence of this transcriptional repressor.

Nucleolar Arf tumor suppressor inhibits ribosomal RNA processing

The p19(Arf) tumor suppressor, a nucleolar protein, binds to Mdm2 to induce p53-dependent cell cycle arrest. Arf also prevents the proliferation of cells lacking Mdm2 and p53, albeit less efficiently. We show that p19(Arf) inhibits production of ribosomal RNA, retarding processing of 47/45S and 32S precursors. These effects correlate with but do not strictly depend upon inhibition of rRNA biosynthesis or cell cycle arrest, are not mimicked by p53, and require neither p53 nor Mdm2. Arf mutants lacking conserved amino acid residues 2-14 do not block rRNA synthesis and processing or inhibit cell proliferation. Evolution may have linked a primordial nucleolar Arf function to Mdm2 and p53, creating a more efficient checkpoint-signaling pathway for coordinating ribosomal biogenesis and cell cycle progression.

Topoisomerase I interactive agents

Increased insight into the mechanism of interaction of topoisomerase I interactive agents will maximize the therapeutic index and enhance the development of additional agents. Preclinical studies designed to elucidate mechanisms by which the topoisomerase I interactive agents induce cell death will be essential. The role of ABC transporters in resistance to topoisomerase I interactive agents has been recently appreciated and future studies should be directed at circumventing this resistance. The results of preclinical studies must be translated into the design of clinical trials so that these agents can be used rationally. In this regard results of preclinical studies have clearly pointed to the enhanced antitumor activity from protracted dosing of topoisomerase I interactive agents and results of clinical trials are now supporting these preclinical findings. Finally, investigators are trying to understand better the mechanism(s) of the dose-limiting toxicities observed with the currently available topoisomerase I interactive agents in an effort to enable the optimal dosing of these agents. Even though the first priority must be to determine the therapeutic potential of the currently available agents, it is reassuring to know that other topoisomerase I interactive agents are currently under development.

Human p14(Arf): an exquisite sensor of morphological changes and of short-lived perturbations in cell cycle and in nucleolar function

The human Ink4a/Arf tumor suppressor locus encodes two distinct products: p16(Ink4a) which prevents phosphorylation and inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein and, p14(Arf), a nucleolar protein which activates the function of the tumor suppressor p53 protein in the nucleoplasm in response to oncogenic stimulation through an as yet ill-defined mechanism. Here we show that the level of endogenous p14(Arf) and its balance between the nucleolus and the nucleoplasm in HeLa cells are exquisitely sensitive to changes in cell morphology and to short-lived perturbations in cell cycle and in nucleolar function such as those induced by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, roscovitine, and the casein kinase II and RNA synthesis inhibitor, DRB. Most remarkably, whereas p14(Arf) predominantly concentrates in the nucleolus of interphase cells and transiently disappears between metaphase and early G1 under normal growth conditions, it massively and reversibly accumulates in the nucleoplasm of postmitotic and S-phase cells upon short-term treatment with roscovitine and, at a lesser extent, DRB. In line with the fact that the nuclear level of p53 reaches a peak between mid-G1 and the G1/S border in p53-expressor cells which lack Arf expression, these results provide a clue that, in p53+/Arf+ cells, Arf proteins might serve both to speed and to amplify p53-mediated responses in conditions and cell cycle periods in which the mechanisms involved in p53 stabilization and activation are not fully operational. They further suggest that human endogenous p14(Arf) might activate p53 pathways in physiologic situations by acting inside the nucleoplasm, especially when normal cell cycle progression and nucleolar function are compromised.

Growth suppression by a p14(ARF) exon 1beta adenovirus in human tumor cell lines of varying p53 and Rb status

We have analyzed the ability of an adenoviral vector encoding the exon 1beta region of the p14(ARF) tumor suppressor (ARF) to suppress the growth and viability of an array of tumor cell lines of various origins and varying p53 and Rb status, in order to establish the clinical potential of ARF. An important activity of ARF is regulation of p53 stability and function through binding to the mdm2 protein. By sequestering mdm2, ARF may promote growth suppression through the Rb pathway as well because mdm2 can bind to Rb and attenuate its function. Whereas the high frequency of ARF gene deletion in human cancers, accounting for some 40% of cancers overall, suggests that ARF would be a strong candidate for therapeutic application, the possible dependence of ARF activity on p53 and Rb function presents a potential limitation to its application, as these functions are often impaired in cancer. We show here that a replication-defective adenovirus, Ad1beta, encoding the exon 1beta region of ARF is most effective in tumor cells expressing endogenous wild-type p53. Nevertheless, Ad1beta suppresses tumor cell growth and viability in vitro and in vivo, inducing G1 or G2 cell cycle arrest and cell death even in tumor cells lacking both functional Rb and p53 pathways, and independently of induction of the p53 downstream targets, p21, bax, and mdm2. These results point to an activity of ARF in human tumor cells that is independent of Rb or p53, and suggest that therapeutic applications based on ARF would have a broad clinical application in cancer.

A major functional difference between the mouse and human ARF tumor suppressor proteins

Suppression of tumorigenesis is considerably more stringent in the human than in the much shorter lived mouse species, and the reasons for this difference are poorly understood. We investigated functional differences in the control of the ARF (alternative reading frame) protein that acts upstream of p53 and is encoded along with p16(INK4a) at a major tumor suppressor locus in both the human and mouse genomes. The mouse and human ARF proteins are substantially divergent at their carboxyl termini. We have shown that the mouse ARF protein (p19ARF) interacts with Pex19p in the cell cytoplasm leading to its nuclear exclusion and repression of its p53 activation function. The human ARF protein (p14ARF) is substantially smaller than its mouse counterpart and is not subject to this functional inactivation by Pex19p. In an identical cellular background, ribozymes directed against Pex19p enhanced p19ARF- but not p14ARF-activated p53 function. This is the first demonstration of a functional difference between the mouse and human ARF proteins. In view of the major role of ARF in tumor suppression, this distinction may contribute to the different levels of tumor proneness of these species.

Abnormalities of the ARF-p53 pathway in primary angiosarcomas of the liver

The INK4a-ARF locus, located on chromosome 9p21, encodes 2 cell cycle-regulatory proteins, p16(INKa) and p14(ARF), acting through the Rb-CDK4 and p53 pathways. This study was done to investigate the contribution of the INK4a-ARF locus in tumorigenesis of angiosarcoma of the liver. Alterations of p14(ARF), p16(INKa), and p53 in primary liver angiosarcoma from 19 patients were analyzed by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP), restriction enzyme-related polymerase chain reaction (RE-PCR), microsatellite analysis, and DNA sequencing. As a control group, 12 angiosarcomas from other organs were analyzed. Promoter methylation of p14(ARF) was found in 5 of 19 cases (26%), and p16(INKa) showed aberrant promoter methylation in 12 of 19 cases (63%). One tumor (5%) had homozygous deletion of the INK4a-ARF locus. Methylation and deletion correlated with loss of mRNA transcription. Methylated p14(ARF) appeared in the context of a methylated p16(INKa) promoter in 3 cases of the 5 angiosarcomas methylated at p14(ARF). p14(ARF) aberrant methylation was not related to the presence of p53 mutations, which was detected in 6 of 19 (32%) cases. Alterations of the INK4a-ARF locus or p53 as were not established independent prognostic factors in these tumors. In conclusion, our data indicate that the INK4a-ARF locus is frequently inactivated in angiosarcoma of the liver and occurs independently of p53 mutations.

p53-independent apoptosis is induced by the p19ARF tumor suppressor

p19(ARF) is a potent tumor suppressor. By inactivating Mdm2, p19(ARF) upregulates p53 activities to induce cell cycle arrest and sensitize cells to apoptosis in the presence of collateral signals. It has also been demonstrated that cell cycle arrest is induced by overexpressed p19(ARF) in p53-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts, only in the absence of the Mdm2 gene. Here, we show that apoptosis can be induced without additional apoptosis signals by expression of p19(ARF) using an adenovirus-mediated expression system in p53-intact cell lines as well as p53-deficient cell lines. Also, in primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) lacking p53/ARF, p53-independent apoptosis is induced irrespective of Mdm2 status by expression of p19(ARF). In agreement, p19(ARF)-mediated apoptosis in U2OS cells, but not in Saos2 cells, was attenuated by coexpression of Mdm2. We thus conclude that there is a p53-independent pathway for p19(ARF)-induced apoptosis that is insensitive to inhibition by Mdm2.

Adenovirus-mediated overexpression of p14(ARF) induces p53 and Bax-independent apoptosis

The human INK4a gene locus encodes two structurally unrelated tumor suppressor proteins, p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF), which are frequently inactivated in human cancer. Whereas p16(INK4a) acts through engagement of the Rb-cdk4/6-cyclin D pathway, both the pro-apoptotic and cell cycle-regulatory functions of p14(ARF) were shown to be primarily dependent on the presence of functional p53. Recent reports have also implicated p14(ARF) in p53-independent mechanisms of cell cycle regulation and apoptosis induction, respectively. To further explore the pro-apoptotic function of p14(ARF) in relation to functional cellular p53, we constructed a replication-deficient adenoviral vector for overexpression of p14(ARF) (Ad-p14(ARF)). As expected, Ad-p14(ARF) efficiently induced apoptosis in p53/Rb wild-type U-2OS osteosarcoma cells at low multiplicities of infection. Interestingly, Ad-p14(ARF) also induced apoptosis in both p53-deleted SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells and HCT116 colon cancer cells with a bi-allelic knock-out of p53 (HCT116-p53(-/-)). Similarly, adenovirus-mediated overexpression of p14(ARF) induced apoptosis in p53/Bax-mutated DU145 prostate cancer cells as well as in HCT116 cells devoid of functional Bax (HCT116-Bax(-/-)). Restoration of Bax expression by retroviral gene transfer in DU145 cells did not further enhance p14(ARF)-triggered cell death. Infection with Ad-p14(ARF) induced activation of mitochondrial permeability shift transition, caspase activation and apoptotic DNA fragmentation irrespective of the presence or absence of either Bax or functional cellular p53. Nevertheless, overexpression of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 homolog Bcl-x(L) markedly inhibited p14(ARF)-induced apoptosis. This may indicate that p14(ARF) triggers a so far unknown activator of mitochondrial apoptosis which can be inhibited by Bcl-2 but which acts either independently or downstream of Bax. Taken together, this report demonstrates the participation of signaling pathways apart from the p53/Mdm-2 rheostat and Bax in p14(ARF)-mediated apoptosis.

Characterization of BTBD1 and BTBD2, two similar BTB-domain-containing Kelch-like proteins that interact with Topoisomerase I

BACKGROUND

Two-hybrid screening for proteins that interact with the core domain of human topoisomerase I identified two novel proteins, BTBD1 and BTBD2, which share 80% amino acid identities.

RESULTS

The interactions were confirmed by co-precipitation assays demonstrating the physical interaction of BTBD1 and BTBD2 with 100 kDa topoisomerase I from HeLa cells. Deletion mapping using two-hybrid and GST-pulldown assays demonstrated that less than the C-terminal half of BTBD1 is sufficient for binding topoisomerase I. The topoisomerase I sequences sufficient to bind BTBD2 were mapped to residues 215 to 329. BTBD2 with an epitope tag localized to cytoplasmic bodies. Using truncated versions that direct BTBD2 and TOP1 to the same cellular compartment, either the nucleus or the cytoplasm, co-localization was demonstrated in co-transfected Hela cells. The supercoil relaxation and DNA cleavage activities of topoisomerase I in vitro were affected little or none by co-incubation with BTBD2. Northern analysis revealed only a single sized mRNA for each BTBD1 and BTBD2 in all human tissues tested. Characterization of BTBD2 mRNA revealed a 255 nucleotide 90% GC-rich region predicted to encode the N-terminus. BTBD1 and BTBD2 are widely if not ubiquitously expressed in human tissues, and have two paralogs as well as putative orthologs in C. elegans and D. melanogaster.

CONCLUSIONS

BTBD1 and BTBD2 belong to a small family of uncharacterized proteins that appear to be specific to animals. Epitope-tagged BTBD2 localized to cytoplasmic bodies. The characterization of BTBD1 and BTBD2 and their interaction with TOP1 is underway.

ARF function does not require p53 stabilization or Mdm2 relocalization

It is generally accepted that the ARF tumor suppressor induces p53-dependent growth arrest by sequestering the p53 antagonist Mdm2 in the nucleolus. Previous mutagenic studies of murine ARF suggested that residues 1 through 14 and 26 through 37 were critical for Mdm2 binding, while the latter domain also governed ARF nucleolar localization. We show that mouse ARF residues 6 to 10 and 21 to 25 are required for ARF-induced growth arrest whereas residues 1 to 5 and 29 to 34 are dispensable. Deletion of the putative nucleolar localization signal (31)RRPR(34) did not prevent nucleolar localization. Surprisingly, unlike wild-type ARF, growth-inhibitory mutants D1-5 and D29-34 failed to stabilize p53 yet induced its transcriptional activation in reporter assays. This suggests that p53 stabilization is not essential for ARF-mediated activation of p53. Like wild-type ARF, both mutants also exhibited p53-independent function since they were able to arrest p53/Mdm2-null cells. Notably, other mutants lacking conserved residues 6 to 10 or 21 to 25 were unable to suppress growth in p53-positive cells despite nucleolar localization and the ability to import Mdm2. Those observations stood in apparent contrast to the ability of wild-type ARF to block growth in some cells without relocalizing endogenous Mdm2 to nucleoli. Together, these data show a lack of correlation between ARF activity and Mdm2 relocalization, suggesting that additional events other than Mdm2 import are required for ARF function.

Mutations in the INK4a/ARF melanoma susceptibility locus functionally impair p14ARF

The INK4a/ARF locus encodes two cell cycle regulatory proteins, the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p16(INK4a), and the p53 activator, p14(ARF). Germline mutations in this locus are associated with melanoma susceptibility in 20-40% of multiple case melanoma families. Many of these mutations specifically impair p16(INK4a), whereas mutations uniquely targeting p14(ARF) are rare. Nevertheless, the importance of p14(ARF) has not been excluded because more than 40% of INK4a/ARF alterations affect p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF). We now report that p14(ARF) is functionally impaired in melanoma kindreds carrying INK4a/ARF mutations. Of the seven INK4a/ARF mutations tested, three altered the subcellular distribution of p14(ARF) and diminished the ability of p14(ARF) to activate the p53 pathway. This work establishes the importance of p14(ARF) in melanoma predisposition.