Transcripts in pretreatment biopsies from a three-arm randomized trial in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

βV-tubulin expression is associated with outcome following taxane-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Background:

Tubulin-binding agents (TBAs) are effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. Both βIII- and βV-tubulins are expressed by cancer cells and may lead to resistance against TBAs.

Methods:

Pre-treatment samples from 65 locally advanced or oligometastatic NSCLC patients, who underwent uniform induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum followed by radiochemotherapy with vinorelbine and platinum were retrospectively analysed by immunohistochemistry. Protein expression of βIII- and βV-tubulin was morphometrically quantified.

Results:

Median pre-treatment H-score for βIII-tubulin was 110 (range: 0–290), and 160 for βV-tubulin (range: 0–290). Low βIII-tubulin expression was associated with improved overall survival (OS) (P=0.0127, hazard ratio (HR): 0.328). An association between high βV-tubulin expression and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS, median 19.2 vs 9.4 months in high vs low expressors; P=0.0315, HR: 1.899) was found. Further, high βV-tubulin expression was associated with objective response (median H-score 172.5 for CR+PR vs 120 for SD+PD patients, P=0.0104) or disease control following induction chemotherapy (170 for CR+PR+SD vs 100 for PD patients, P=0.0081), but not radiochemotherapy.

Conclusion:

Expression of βV-tubulin was associated with treatment response and PFS following paclitaxel-based chemotherapy of locally advanced and oligometastatic NSCLC patients. Prolonged OS was associated with low levels of βIII-tubulin. Prospective evaluation of βIII/βV-tubulin expression in NSCLC is warranted.

Novel water-soluble substituted pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines: design, synthesis, and biological evaluation as antitubulin antitumor agents

PURPOSE

To study the effects of a regioisomeric change on the biological activities of previously reported water soluble, colchicine site binding, microtubule depolymerizing agents.

METHODS

Nine pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines were designed and synthesized. The importance of various substituents was evaluated. Their abilities to cause cellular microtubule depolymerization, inhibit proliferation of MDA-MB-435 tumor cells and inhibit colchicine binding to tubulin were studied. One of the compounds was also evaluated in the National Cancer Institute preclinical 60 cell line panel.

RESULTS

Pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine analogs were more potent than their pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine regioisomers. We identified compounds with submicromolar potency against cellular proliferation. The structure-activity relationship study gave insight into substituents that were crucial for activity and those that improved activity. The compound tested in the NCI 60 cell line is a 2-digit nanomolar (GI(50)) inhibitor of 8 tumor cell lines.

CONCLUSION

We have identified substituted pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines that are water-soluble colchicine site microtubule depolymerizing agents. These compounds serve as leads for further optimization.

The influence of gemcitabine pathway polymorphisms on treatment outcome in patients with malignant mesothelioma

OBJECTIVE

Identification of biomarkers that could predict gemcitabine efficacy and toxicity is a key issue in the development of individualized therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of gemcitabine pathway polymorphisms on treatment outcome in patients with malignant mesothelioma (MM).

METHODS

In total, 107 patients with MM, treated with gemcitabine-platinum chemotherapy, were genotyped for 11 polymorphisms in deoxycytidine kinase, ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1), and cytidine deaminase genes using KASPar assays. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of selected polymorphisms on tumor response and occurrence of treatment-related toxicity, while their influence on survival was estimated by Cox proportional hazards model. A haplotype analysis was carried out to assess the combined effect of RRM1 polymorphisms.

RESULTS

Deoxycytidine kinase and cytidine deaminase polymorphisms did not influence treatment outcome in patients with MM. In multivariable analysis, RRM1 2927A>C polymorphism significantly decreased overall survival probability [hazard ratio (HR)=2.02; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.11-3.65; P=0.021]. Two promoter polymorphisms, RRM1 -524T>C and -37C>A, decreased the odds of nausea/vomiting grade≥2 occurrence [odds ratio (OR)=0.25; 95% CI=0.10-0.60; P=0.002 and OR=0.26; 95% CI=0.11-0.63; P=0.003, respectively]. RRM1 TTCCA haplotype was associated with worse tumor response (OR=16.67; 95% CI=2.38-100.00; P=0.004) and worse overall survival (HR=2.97; 95% CI=1.46-6.06; P=0.003) compared with the most frequent TTCAA haplotype, while TCACA haplotype influenced nausea/vomiting grade≥2 occurrence (OR=0.27; 95% CI=0.12-0.60; P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

RRM1 polymorphisms as well as haplotypes showed an association with gemcitabine treatment efficacy and toxicity; therefore, they should be validated as potential markers for the prediction of clinical outcome in patients with MM.

A decade of advances in treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The last decade has heralded a paradigm shift in the evaluation and treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No longer are patients with NSCLC considered a homogeneous population treated in the same way; rather, clinical characteristics, histology, and an expanding array of molecular markers are increasingly being used to individualize therapy. Both histology and tumor epidermal growth factor receptor mutational status currently have firmly established roles in determining initial and salvage therapy for advanced NSCLC. Several other biomarkers are the focus of ongoing prospective randomized clinical trials customizing both traditional chemotherapy and newer molecularly targeted agents.

High TUBB3 expression, an independent prognostic marker in patients with early non-small cell lung cancer treated by preoperative chemotherapy, is regulated by K-Ras signaling pathway

We assessed the prognostic and predictive value of β-tubulin III (TUBB3) expression, as determined by immunohistochemistry, in 412 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) specimens from early-stage patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel- or gemcitabine-based) in a phase III trial (IFCT-0002). We also correlated TUBB3 expression with K-Ras and EGF receptor (EGFR) mutations in a subset of 208 cryopreserved specimens. High TUBB3 protein expression was associated with nonsquamous cell carcinomas (P < 0.001) and K-Ras mutation (P < 0.001). The 127 (30.8%) TUBB3-negative patients derived more than 1 year of overall survival advantage, with more than 84 months median overall survival versus 71.7 months for TUBB3-positive patients [HR, 1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-2.25)]. This prognostic value was confirmed in multivariate analysis (adjusted HR for death, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.04-2.21; P = 0.031) with a bootstrapping validation procedure. TUBB3 expression was associated with nonresponse to chemotherapy (adjusted HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.01-1.70; P = 0.044) but had no predictive value (taxane vs. gemcitabine). Taking account of these clinical findings, we further investigated TUBB3 expression in isogenic human bronchial cell lines only differing by K-Ras gene status and assessed the effect of K-Ras short interfering RNA (siRNA) mediated depletion, cell hypoxia, or pharmacologic inhibitors of K-Ras downstream effectors, on TUBB3 protein cell content. siRNA K-Ras knockdown, inhibition of RAF/MEK (MAP-ERK kinase) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling, and hypoxia were shown to downregulate TUBB3 expression in bronchial cells. This study is the first one to identify K-Ras mutations as determinant of TUBB3 expression, a chemoresistance marker. Our in vitro data deserve studies combining standard chemotherapy with anti-MEK or anti-PI3K drugs in patients with TUBB3-overexpressing tumors.

The role of βIII-tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated by taxane-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether class III β-tubulin (TUBB3) expression could predict progression-free survival or overall survival in relapsed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with taxene-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistal staining was used to examine the expression of TUBB3 in resected lung tumor specimens obtained from 56 patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy against recurrent tumors after curative resections. Excision repair cross-complementation group 1, breast cancer susceptibility gene 1, vascular endothelial growth factor, Ki-67, CD34, and p53 were also correlated with clinical features and outcome after treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 56 patients enrolled in the study, 29 were treated by carboplatin plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment, and 24 patients received docetaxel monotherapy as second- or third-line treatment. A positive TUBB3 expression is closely associated with a poor response to taxane-based chemotherapy. TUBB3 expression was an independent prognostic factor for predicting poor progression-free survival after docetaxel administration. However, TUBB3 expression could not predict outcome after carboplatin plus paclitaxel treatment. The other biomarkers tested were not independent prognostic factors for predicting outcome after taxane-based chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

TUBB3 expression is associated with resistance to taxane-based chemotherapy and is an independent prognostic factor for predicting poor progression-free survival after docetaxel treatment alone. TUBB3 expression may be a predictive marker for chemoresistance to docetaxel in NSCLC with postoperative recurrent disease.

The potential of exploiting DNA-repair defects for optimizing lung cancer treatment

The tumor genome is commonly aberrant as a consequence of mutagenic insult and incomplete DNA repair. DNA repair as a therapeutic target has recently received considerable attention owing to the promise of drugs that target tumor-specific DNA-repair enzymes and potentiate conventional cytotoxic therapy through mechanism-based approaches, such as synthetic lethality. Treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consists mainly of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and improvements are urgently needed. Optimizing treatment according to tumor status for DNA-repair biomarkers, such as ERCC1, BRCA1 or RRM1, could predict response to platinum, taxanes and gemcitabine-based therapies, respectively, and might improve substantially the response of individual patients' tumors. Finally, recent data on germline variation in DNA-repair genes may also be informative. Here, we discuss how a molecular and functional DNA-repair classification of NSCLC may aid clinical decision making and improve patient outcome.

Cross-validation study of class III beta-tubulin as a predictive marker for benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in resected non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of four randomized trials

BACKGROUND

The IALT, JBR.10, ANITA and Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9633 trials compared adjuvant chemotherapy with observation for patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer (R-NSCLC). Data from the metastatic setting suggest high tumor class III beta-tubulin (TUBB3) expression is a determinant of insensitivity to tubulin-targeting agents (e.g. vinorelbine, paclitaxel). In 265 patients from JBR.10 (vinorelbine-cisplatin versus observation), high TUBB3 was an adverse prognostic factor and was associated (nonsignificantly) with 'greater' survival benefit from chemotherapy. We explored this further in additional patients from JBR.10 and the other three trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

TUBB3 immunohistochemical staining was scored for 1149 patients on the four trials. The original JBR.10 cut-off scores were used to classify tumors as TUBB3 high or low. The prognostic and predictive value of TUBB3 on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed by Cox models stratified by trial and adjusted for clinical factors.

RESULTS

High TUBB3 expression was prognostic for OS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.27 (1.07-1.51), P=0.008) and DFS [HR=1.30 (1.11-1.53), P=0.001). TUBB3 was not predictive of a differential treatment effect [interaction P=0.20 (OS), P=0.23 (DFS)]. Subset analysis (n=420) on vinorelbine-cisplatin gave similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic effect of high TUBB3 expression in patients with R-NSCLC has been validated. We were unable to confirm a predictive effect for TUBB3.

Stathmin: a protein with many tasks. New biomarker and potential target in cancer

INTRODUCTION

Stathmin is a microtubule-destabilizing phosphoprotein, firstly identified as the downstream target of many signal transduction pathways. Several studies then indicated that stathmin is overexpressed in many types of human malignancies, thus deserving the name of Oncoprotein 18 (Op18). At molecular level, stathmin depolymerizes microtubules by either sequestering free tubulin dimers or directly inducing microtubule-catastrophe. A crucial role for stathmin in the control of mitosis has been proposed, since both its overexpression and its downregulation induce failure in the correct completion of cell division. Accordingly, stathmin is an important target of the main regulator of M phase, cyclin-dependent kinase 1.

AREAS COVERED

Recent evidences support a role for stathmin in the regulation of cell growth and motility, both in vitro and in vivo, and indicate its involvement in advanced, invasive and metastatic cancer more than in primary tumors.

EXPERT OPINION

Many studies suggest that high stathmin expression levels in cancer negatively influence the response to microtubule-targeting drugs. These notions together with the fact that stathmin is expressed at very low levels in most adult tissues strongly support the use of stathmin as marker of prognosis and as target for novel anti-tumoral and anti-metastatic therapies.

Synthesis and biological activities of (R)- and (S)-N-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-N,2,6-trimethyl-6,7-dihydro-5H-cyclopenta[d]pyrimidin-4-aminium chloride as potent cytotoxic antitubulin agents

(R,S)-1 is a potent antimitotic compound. (R)-1·HCl and (S)-1·HCl were synthesized from (R)- and (S)-3-methyladipic acid. Both enantiomers were potent inhibitors of cell proliferation and caused cellular microtubule loss and mitotic arrest. They inhibited purified tubulin assembly and the binding of [(3)H]colchicine to tubulin, with (S)-1 being about twice as potent. Cytotoxicity against 60 tumor cell lines, however, indicated that the (S)-isomer was 10- to 88-fold more potent than the (R)-isomer.

[Relations between RRM1 protein expression levels and effects of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

It has been proven that ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) expression level was closely related to gemcitabine drug-resistance to tumor cells. The aim of this study is to explore the relations between RRM1 protein expression levels and effects of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

The expressions of RRM1 in 75 advanced NSCLC tissues were qualitatively detected by immunohistochemical methods. Seventy-five patients had received gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy regimen. General characteristics of patients, response to treatment, efficacy evaluation and survival time were retrospectively investigated. Differences between the groups were statistically analysed by chi-square test. Survival differences were analysed by temporal inspection and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

RRM1 protein expression rate was 38.7%. RRM1 protein expression had no obvious relationship with gender, age, smoking status, and the clinical stages and histopathological types (P > 0.05). Response rate in RRM1 protein high expression groups (31.3%) was remarkably lower than that in low expression groups (41.3%), the difference was statistically significant (P=0.005). 1-year survival rate in RRM1 protein high expression groups (27.6%) was remarkably lower than that in low expression group (58.7%), the difference was statistically significant (P=0.009). No significant different of median survival was observed between RMM1 protein high expression group and low expression group (P >0.245). Time to progression in RRM1 protein high expression groups (3.10 months) was remarkably lower than that in low expression group (5.11 months), the difference was statistically significant (P=0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

RRM1 protein expression levels are closely related to effects of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy and prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients.

RRM1 expression and clinical outcome of gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The predictive value of RRM1 to therapeutic efficacy of gemicitabine-containing chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains disputable. This meta-analysis is performed to systematically evaluate whether RRM1 expression is associated with the clinical outcome of gemcitabine-containing regimen in advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

An electronic search was conducted using the databases Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane library and CNKI, from inception to May, 2011. A systemic review of the studies on the association between RRM1 expression in advanced NSCLC and clinical outcome of gemcitabine-containing regimen was performed. Pooled odds ratios (OR) for the response rate, weighted median survival and time to progression were calculated using the software Revman 5.0.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 18 eligible studies (n=1243). Response rate to gemcitabine-containing regimen was significantly higher in patients with low/negative RRM1 (OR=0.31, 95% CI 0.21-0.45, P<0.00001). NSCLC patients with low/negative RRM1 who were treated with gemicitabine-containing regimen survived 3.94 months longer (95% CI 2.15-5.73, P<0.0001) and had longer time to progression for 2.64 months (95% CI 0.39-4.89, P=0.02) than those with high/positive RRM1.

CONCLUSIONS

Low/negative RRM1 expression in advanced NSCLC was associated with higher response rate to gemcitabine-containing regimen and better prognosis. Large phase III randomized trials are required to identify whether RRM1 detection is clinically valuable for predicting the prognosis and sensitivity to gemcitabine-containing regimen in advanced NSCLC.

Molecular predictors of response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States with 222,520 new cases and 157,300 deaths anticipated in 2010. The primary objective of any cancer treatment is to improve patient outcomes including overall survival and quality of life while minimizing treatment toxicity. As our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of lung cancer evolves, improved methods of therapeutic selection may help clinicians better realize these goals. Such selection may be accomplished by examining biomarkers within patients' tumors that may provide prognostic information such as risk of recurrence in early stage disease or predict benefit from specific therapies regardless of disease stage. Three such biomarkers have emerged--excision repair cross-complementation group 1, the regulatory subunit of the ribonucleotide reductase enzyme, and thymidylate synthase--and are actively being evaluated in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. This review will focus on the role of these biomarkers as predictive and/or prognostic markers in the selection of chemotherapy regimens in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Siva1 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of tumor cells by inhibiting stathmin and stabilizing microtubules

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) enables epithelial cells to acquire motility and invasiveness that are characteristic of mesenchymal cells. It plays an important role in development and tumor cell metastasis. However, the mechanisms of EMT and their dysfunction in cancer cells are still not well understood. Here we report that Siva1 interacts with stathmin, a microtubule destabilizer. Siva1 inhibits stathmin's activity directly as well as indirectly through Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II-mediated phosphorylation of stathmin at Ser16. Via the inhibition of stathmin, Siva1 enhances the formation of microtubules and impedes focal adhesion assembly, cell migration, and EMT. Low levels of Siva1 and Ser16-phosphorylated stathmin correlate with high metastatic states of human breast cancer cells. In mouse models, knockdown of Siva1 promotes cancer dissemination, whereas overexpression of Siva1 inhibits it. These results suggest that microtubule dynamics are critical for EMT. Furthermore, they reveal an important role for Siva1 in suppressing cell migration and EMT and indicate that down-regulation of Siva1 may contribute to tumor cell metastasis.

2-Amino-4-methyl-5-phenylethyl substituted-7-N-benzyl-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidines as novel antitumor antimitotic agents that also reverse tumor resistance

Gangjee et al. recently reported a novel series of 2-amino-4-methyl-5-phenylethyl substituted-7-benzyl-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidines, some of which exhibited two digit nanomolar antitumor and antimitotic activity and were not subject to P-glycoprotein (Pgp) or multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) mediated tumor resistance (unlike the Vinca alkaloids and taxanes). Some of these compounds, in addition to their antitumor activity, had the ability to reverse the Pgp-mediated resistance to clinically used antimitotic agents. This report consists of an attempt to optimize the various activities of the parent compounds by synthetic variations of the phenyl ring of the 5-phenylethyl side chain. The target compounds were synthesized via a nine-step synthesis involving a Sonogashira reaction. The substituted phenylacetylenes as coupling partners were in turn synthesized from unactivated aryl bromides or iodides. The target compounds exhibited moderate cytotoxicity against MCF-7 tumor cells. However, most of these compounds showed improved cytotoxicity against the resistant NCI/ADR and MCF-7/VP. This study afforded an analog which reversed both Pgp-mediated as well as MRP1-mediated resistance to clinically used antimitotic agents, along with its own antimitotic mediated antitumor activity. In addition, in the NCI-60 cell line panel one of the compounds inhibited the growth of MDA-MD-435 breast cancer cell line at submicromolar concentration.

How close are we to customizing chemotherapy in early non-small cell lung cancer?

Although surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 5-year survival rates range from 77% for stage IA tumors to 23% in stage IIIA disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy has recently been established as a standard of care for resected stage II-III NSCLC, on the basis of large-scale clinical trials employing third-generation platinum-based regimens. As the overall absolute 5-year survival benefit from this approach does not exceed 5% and potential long-term complications are an issue of concern, the aim of customized adjuvant systemic treatment is to optimize the toxicity/benefit ratio, so that low-risk individuals are spared from unnecessary intervention, while avoiding undertreatment of high-risk patients, including those with stage I disease. Therefore, the application of reliable prognostic and predictive biomarkers would enable to identify appropriate patients for the most effective treatment.This is an overview of the data available on the most promising clinicopathological and molecular biomarkers that could affect adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy decisions for operable NSCLC in routine practice. Among the numerous candidate molecular biomarkers, only few gene-expression profiling signatures provide clinically relevant information warranting further validation. On the other hand, real-time quantitative polymerase-chain reaction strategy involving relatively small number of genes offers a practical alternative, with high cross-platform performance. Although data extrapolation from the metastatic setting should be cautious, the concept of personalized, pharmacogenomics-guided chemotherapy for early NSCLC seems feasible, and is currently being evaluated in randomized phase 2 and 3 trials. The mRNA and/or protein expression levels of excision repair cross-complementation group 1, ribonucleotide reductase M1 and breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 are among the most potential biomarkers for early disease, with stage-independent prognostic and predictive values, the clinical utility of which is being validated prospectively. Inter-assay discordance in determining the biomarker status and association with clinical outcomes is noteworthing.

RRM1 gene expression in peripheral blood is predictive of shorter survival in Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated by gemcitabine and platinum

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the predictive values of gene expressions of ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) and breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) in peripheral blood from Chinese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gemcitabine plus platinum.

METHODS

Forty Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC were recruited and received gemcitabine 1 200 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC 5 on Day 1. RRM1 and BRCA1 expression levels in peripheral blood were detected by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test were performed to evaluate the correlation between gene expression and overall survival for these subjects.

RESULTS

No correlation was observed between gene expression of RRM1 and that of BRCA1 (P>0.05), but there was a strong correlation between the expression of RRM1 and the response to chemotherapy (P=0.003). Subjects with low RRM1 expression levels in peripheral blood had longer survival time than those with high RRM1 expression levels (16.95 vs. 12.76 months, log-rank 3.989, P=0.046). However, no significant association between BRCA1 expression levels and survival time was found (16.80 vs. 13.77 months, log-rank 0.830, P=0.362).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with low RRM1 expression levels in peripheral blood have a greater response to chemotherapy and longer survival time. Advanced NSCLC patients with low RRM1 expression levels may benefit from gemcitabine plus platinum therapy. RRM1 mRNA expression in peripheral blood could be used to predict the prognosis of NSCLC treated by gemcitabine and platinum.

Biomarkers, prediction, and prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer: a platform for personalized treatment

In lung cancer, the introduction of targeted agents in those patients who carry a genetic abnormality has resulted in better clinical outcomes with better quality of life. These molecular abnormalities have also become predictive biomarkers. It is imperative that we continue searching for these biomarkers in different tumorigenesis pathways, so we can provide the most appropriate therapy to each individual in the near future. Since the 1980s, chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer has been shown to provide a small improvement in survival. In the early 1990s, platinum-based regimens became the backbone of treatment for this disease. In 2002, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1594 clinical trial showed that there was no overall survival difference among four common chemotherapy regimens used in non-small-cell lung cancer. It was not until 2006 when the introduction of biologic agents into the field of lung cancer improved, for the first time ever, median overall survival beyond 1 year. To date, we recognize that there are differences between all histologic subtypes of non-small-cell lung cancer in terms of their response to specific agents. All these plus the introduction of molecular medicine have resulted in the identification of markers for prognosis and prediction in lung cancer. In this review, we describe the actual and ongoing clinical efforts to validate the prognostic and predictive value of these potential markers in lung cancer. We hope that the clinical use of biomarkers will help us to deliver personalized medicine to our lung cancer patients by improving their quality of response which may translate into further survival advantage.

Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: consensus on pathology and molecular tests, first-line, second-line, and third-line therapy: 1st ESMO Consensus Conference in Lung Cancer; Lugano 2010

The 1st ESMO Consensus Conference on lung cancer was held in Lugano, Switzerland on 21 and 22 May 2010 with the participation of a multidisciplinary panel of leading professionals in pathology and molecular diagnostics, medical oncology, surgical oncology and radiation oncology. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared clinically relevant questions concerning five areas: early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-line metastatic NSCLC, second-/third-line NSCLC, NSCLC pathology and molecular testing, and small-cell lung cancer to be addressed through discussion at the Consensus Conference. All relevant scientific literature for each question was reviewed in advance. During the Consensus Conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question. The consensus agreement on three of these areas: NSCLC pathology and molecular testing, the treatment of first-line, and second-line/third-line therapy in metastatic NSCLC are reported in this article. The recommendations detailed here are based on an expert consensus after careful review of published data. All participants have approved this final update.

Tubulin, BRCA1, ERCC1, Abraxas, RAP80 mRNA expression, p53/p21 immunohistochemistry and clinical outcome in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line platinum-gemcitabine chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of tumor expression of nine genes on clinical outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving platinum-gemcitabine chemotherapy.

METHODS

Quantitative PCR or immunohistochemistry were used to analyze the expression of β-tubuline IIA (TUBB2A), β-tubuline III (TUBB3), BRCA1, ERCC1, Abraxas (ABRX) and RAP80 in mRNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies of 45 NSCLC patients treated as part of a larger observational trial. All patients received first-line platinum-gemcitabine chemotherapy for stage IIIB or IV NSCLC.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months, overall survival (OS) 12 months. A partial treatment response was found in 14 patients (33%). Patients with low ERCC1 or ABRX expression had a significantly better response to chemotherapy (R=-0.45, p<0.01 for ERCC1; R=-0.40, p=0.016 for ABRX). A significant correlation was found between the individual time for PFS and the expression of both ERCC1 (R=-0.36, p=0.015) and ABRX (R=-0.46, p=0.001). Patients with low ERCC1 expression had a longer OS as compared to patients with high ERCC1 expression (HR=0.26, log-rank p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms tumor expression of ERCC1 as a predictor for clinical outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, and found ABRX expression to be similarly predictive of clinical outcome. Prospective validation is warranted and - if confirmed - non platinum-containing chemotherapy should be explored as the preferred treatment in patients with high ERCC1 or ABRX expression and no activating mutations of EGFR.

Predicting response to chemotherapy with early-stage lung cancer

A recent meta-analysis of 11,107 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had undergone surgical resection showed that the 5-year survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was 4%, and that of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 5%. Two trials have shown a trend toward improved survival with adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin. However, the benefit of adjuvant treatment remains suboptimal. We must distinguish between patients who will not relapse-and who can thus be spared adjuvant treatment-and those who will-for whom adjuvant treatment must be personalized. Several gene expression signatures, generally containing nonoverlapping genes, provide similar predictive information on clinical outcome, and a model combining several signatures did not perform better than did each of the signatures separately. The invasiveness gene signature, containing 186 genes, includes genes involved in the nuclear factor κB pathway, the RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, and epigenetic control of gene expression. A 15-gene signature has identified JBR.10 patients who are more sensitive to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Biomarkers of DNA repair and related pathways: significance in non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review selected biomarkers of DNA repair and related pathways as they relate to the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), emphasizing the role of individualized, chemotherapy for advanced disease, and discussing potential applications in early disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The activity of molecular-targeted agents in NSCLC patients whose tumor possesses relevant biomarkers [such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations and ALK translocations] has made personalized therapy possible. In addition, preclinical and clinical studies have shown that histopathological and biomolecular factors can correlate with clinical outcome in patients with NSCLC treated with chemotherapy. As a result, tumor histology is now routinely considered in selecting chemotherapy for NSCLC patients, such as pemetrexed for nonsquamous histology. Molecular tumor and host factors, including genes involved in DNA-repair and synthesis, are potentially even more relevant as predictive biomarkers of tumor response to chemotherapy. However, individual molecular markers and gene signatures need further validation and standardization, before routine use in the clinic can be recommended.

SUMMARY

In the era of molecular-targeted agents, individualized therapy based on molecular biomarkers has become a reality in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. Further studies are needed to optimize current treatment algorithms with regard to biomarkers for chemotherapy benefit, to refine molecular markers, and to translate these findings to early stage NSCLC.

A randomized phase II of gemcitabine and sorafenib versus sorafenib alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer have limited therapeutic options. The role of the Ras-Raf-MAPK pathway and of vascular endothelial growth factor in pancreatic carcinogenesis provided the rational to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib with or without gemcitabine in a randomized phase II study.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomized to sorafenib alone (arm A) or sorafenib with gemcitabine (arm B).

RESULTS

Arm A was closed to accrual at interim analysis due to the lack of objective response. Median PFS and OS were 2.3 and 4.3 months respectively. There was one partial response among the 37 patients in arm B. Median PFS and OS were 2.9 and 6.5 months respectively. There were more grade 3 and 4 toxicities in arm B with the most common being neutropenia (17%), thrombocytopenia (8%), alkaline phosphatase elevation (14%), venous thromboembolism (8%), diarrhea, hypokalemia and ALT elevation (5%) each. Several associations were noted between single nucleotide polymorphisms in ribonucleotide reductase, Cox-2, vascular endothelial growth factor and survival in patients treated with gemcitabine and sorafenib.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither sorafenib alone or sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine manifested promising activity in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

The ribonucleotide reductase large subunit (RRM1) as a predictive factor in patients with cancer

The large subunit of human ribonucleotide reductase, RRM1, is involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, cell migration, tumour and metastasis development, and the synthesis of deoxyribonucleotides for DNA synthesis. It is also a cellular target for the chemotherapeutic agent, gemcitabine. RRM1 has been studied in a large number of patients with different types of cancer, such as non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, and biliary tract cancer, to establish its prognostic or predictive value when patients were treated with gemcitabine, and mRNA expression and genetic variants as determined by genotyping have in some cases been associated with clinical outcome of patients with cancer. Here, we review preclinical and clinical studies of RRM1 assessment and discuss the further steps in the development of this clinically pertinent biomarker.

Correlation of BRCA1, TXR1 and TSP1 mRNA expression with treatment outcome to docetaxel-based first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We explored the predictive significance of BRCA1, TXR1 and TSP1 expression in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with docetaxel in association with cisplatin or gemcitabine.

METHODS

To analyse BRCA1, TXR1 and TSP1 mRNA expression from microdissected primary tumours of 131 patients with stage IIIB (wet) and IV NSCLC, RT-qPCR was used.

RESULTS

The mRNA levels of TXR1/TSP1 were inversely correlated (Spearman's test: -0.37; P=0.001). Low TXR1 mRNA levels were associated with higher response rate (RR; P=0.018), longer median progression-free survival (PFS; P=0.029) and median overall survival (mOS P=0.003), whereas high TSP1 expression was correlated with higher RR (P=0.035), longer PFS (P<0.001) and mOS (P<0.001). Higher BRCA1 mRNA expression was associated with higher RR (P=0.028) and increased PFS (P=0.021), but not mOS (P=0.4). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that low TXR1/high TSP1 expression was an independent factor for increased PFS (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.32-0.76; P<0.001) and mOS (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.2-0.58; P<0.001), whereas high BRCA1 expression was correlated with increased PFS (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.37-0.78; P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that TXR1/TSP1 and BRCA1 expression could be used for the prediction of taxanes' resistance in the treatment of NSCLC.

Synthesis and discovery of water-soluble microtubule targeting agents that bind to the colchicine site on tubulin and circumvent Pgp mediated resistance

Two classes of molecules were designed and synthesized based on a 6-CH(3) cyclopenta[d]pyrimidine scaffold and a pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine scaffold. The pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidines were synthesized by reacting ethyl 2-cyano-4,4-diethoxybutanoate and acetamidine, which in turn was chlorinated and reacted with the appropriate anilines to afford 1 and 2. The cyclopenta[d]pyrimidines were obtained from 3-methyladapic acid, followed by reaction with acetamidine to afford the cyclopenta[d]pyrimidine scaffold. Chlorination and reaction with appropriate anilines afforded (±)-3·HCl-(±)-7·HCl. Compounds 1 and (±)-3·HCl had potent antiproliferative activities in the nanomolar range. Compound (±)-3·HCl is significantly more potent than 1. Mechanistic studies showed that 1 and (±)-3·HCl cause loss of cellular microtubules, inhibit the polymerization of purified tubulin, and inhibit colchicine binding. Modeling studies show interactions of these compounds within the colchicine site. The identification of these new inhibitors that can also overcome clinically relevant mechanisms of drug resistance provides new scaffolds for colchicine site agents.

Chemotherapy, chemoresistance and the changing treatment landscape for NSCLC

Management of patients with lung cancer continues to pose a considerable challenge to today's oncologist. While treatment may be curative in the early stages of the disease, the majority of patients are not diagnosed until the tumor has progressed beyond the primary site. Most patients face an intensive and invasive treatment regimen comprising surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy, or combinations thereof depending on disease stage/performance status. Most will require chemotherapy even if their initial surgery is potentially curative; for those with advanced disease, chemotherapy may be their only treatment option. Moreover, the majority of patients will require multiple lines of therapy as their cancer cells acquire resistance to the chemotherapeutic agents to which they are exposed. Resistance to current chemotherapeutics available for the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents one of the most significant barriers to improving long-term outcomes for this vulnerable patient group. Future management may lie in individualizing therapy through careful selection of appropriate agents based on the likelihood of response and the development of resistance. A number of biomarkers are emerging that predict response to current therapeutics; work is ongoing to develop appropriate algorithms based on such markers to guide treatment selection. In addition, novel chemotherapeutics are in development including new platinum analogs such as picoplatin (a cisplatin analog), ABT-751 (a sulfonamide) and tubulin binding agents (TBAs) such as the epothilones, providing hope for the future.

Tumor and host factors that may limit efficacy of chemotherapy in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer

While chemotherapy provides useful palliation, advanced lung cancer remains incurable since those tumors that are initially sensitive to therapy rapidly develop acquired resistance. Resistance may arise from impaired drug delivery, extracellular factors, decreased drug uptake into tumor cells, increased drug efflux, drug inactivation by detoxifying factors, decreased drug activation or binding to target, altered target, increased damage repair, tolerance of damage, decreased proapoptotic factors, increased antiapoptotic factors, or altered cell cycling or transcription factors. Factors for which there is now substantial clinical evidence of a link to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) resistance to chemotherapy include MRP (for platinum-based combination chemotherapy) and MDR1/P-gp (for non-platinum agents). SPECT MIBI and Tc-TF scanning appears to predict chemotherapy benefit in SCLC. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the strongest clinical evidence is for taxane resistance with elevated expression or mutation of class III beta-tubulin (and possibly alpha tubulin), platinum resistance and expression of ERCC1 or BCRP, gemcitabine resistance and RRM1 expression, and resistance to several agents and COX-2 expression (although COX-2 inhibitors have had minimal impact on drug efficacy clinically). Tumors expressing high BRCA1 may have increased resistance to platinums but increased sensitivity to taxanes. Limited early clinical data suggest that chemotherapy resistance in NSCLC may also be increased with decreased expression of cyclin B1 or of Eg5, or with increased expression of ICAM, matrilysin, osteopontin, DDH, survivin, PCDGF, caveolin-1, p21WAF1/CIP1, or 14-3-3sigma, and that IGF-1R inhibitors may increase efficacy of chemotherapy, particularly in squamous cell carcinomas. Equivocal data (with some positive studies but other negative studies) suggest that NSCLC tumors with some EGFR mutations may have increased sensitivity to chemotherapy, while K-ras mutations and expression of GST-pi, RB or p27kip1 may possibly confer resistance. While limited clinical data suggest that p53 mutations are associated with resistance to platinum-based therapies in NSCLC, data on p53 IHC positivity are equivocal. To date, resistance-modulating strategies have generally not proven clinically useful in lung cancer, although small randomized trials suggest a modest benefit of verapamil and related agents in NSCLC.

[American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer]

本文旨在为Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗提供更新版推荐。本文资料检索源自2002年以来公布的相关随机试验文献。此指南范围限于化疗与生物治疗。更新委员会对这些文献进行了总结并提供了推荐更新。162篇文献符合标准被纳入参考。本推荐基于可改善总生存期的治疗方法。仅改善无进展生存期的治疗方法推动了对毒性及生存质量的监测。对于体力状态评分为0分或1分患者的一线治疗，可推荐以铂类为基础的细胞毒性药物的两药联用。对铂类治疗有禁忌的患者，可采用非铂类细胞毒性两药联合。对于体力状态评分为2分的患者，单一细胞毒性药物即可。对于疾病进展或经过4个周期的治疗仍对治疗无反应的患者，应停止一线细胞毒性化疗。即使在6个周期后患者对治疗仍有反应，亦应停止两药细胞毒性化疗。对于伴有明确的表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）突变的患者，可推荐一线采用吉非替尼治疗；对于EGFR突变为阴性或不明确的患者，细胞毒性化疗更佳。除具有特定临床特征的患者外，可推荐贝伐单抗与卡铂-紫杉醇联用。对于通过免疫组化证实EGFR阳性的肿瘤患者，可推荐西妥昔单抗与顺铂-长春瑞滨联用。多西紫杉醇、厄洛替尼、吉非替尼或培美曲塞被推荐作为二线治疗。对于未曾接受过厄洛替尼或吉非替尼治疗的患者，可推荐厄洛替尼作为三线治疗。现有数据不足以推荐常规三线采用细胞毒性药物。已有的证据也不足以推荐常规应用分子标记物选择化疗。

Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer in relation to expression of predictive and prognostic biomarkers

Chemotherapy (platinum-based doublet) remains a key component of treatment for early, locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. In the last decade, several important studies, including randomized clinical trials involving the use of new chemotherapeutic agents or targeted therapies, have been published. Targeted therapies have been tried as an alternative to, in conjunction with or following failure of standard chemotherapy regimens. Biomarkers have also been identified that predict responsiveness to and outcomes with commonly used chemotherapeutic agents, as well as targeted therapies. A trend for individualizing therapy for each patient based on baseline demographic characteristics, especially tumor histology and expression of predictive biomarkers, has been witnessed in the recent past. In this article, we have summarized the available literature on the role of histology and molecular markers of clinical relevance in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Perspectives in adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC

In 2007 the long-term outcome of lung cancer is still disappointing, with a 5-year survival rate not exceeding 15%. However, small but significant improvements in survival times have been achieved in the last decade. This progress has been achieved through the improvement of surgical techniques and following the introduction of more effective anticancer agents, mainly cisplatin in combination with newer agents (vinorelbine, taxanes, gemcitabine). The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-IIIA disease has been clearly demonstrated. Hints of some efficacy have also emerged for stage IB, while data on active adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IA, mostly from Japanese studies with oral uracil-tegafur, need to be confirmed in non-Asian patients. Optimal chemotherapy regimens and the role of targeted agents in the adjuvant setting are currently unknown. Increasing numbers of patients must be enrolled in adjuvant trials with a design based on pharmacogenomics profiles. Therefore, efforts should be directed toward the collection of surgical specimens to define biomolecular markers to select patients who will benefit from adjuvant treatments on an individual basis.

Biomarkers in lung oncology

The survival of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients is short in spite of advances in new combination chemotherapy regimens. The benefit of adding antiangiogenic drugs and/or EGFR inhibitors is unclear. For the vast majority of patients without EGFR mutations, treatment approaches based on customization should be pursued. BRCA1 is central to the repair of DNA damage and is an important modulator of the differential effect of chemotherapy. Retrospective and prospective data indicate that low BRCA1 mRNA levels predict better response and survival when patients are treated with cisplatin, non-taxane combinations. For an important subgroup of patients with EGFR mutations, selective treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors is a major advance, with a dramatic impact on clinical outcomes. In a prospective study of customized erlotinib [1], overall response rate was 70% (including 12% complete responses), median progression free survival was 14 months (even longer in women and in patients with del 19), 20% of patients were disease-free at three years, and median survival was 27 months. Nonetheless, these clinical outcomes fall short of curability and continuous treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib is required. It is plausible that several genetically defined subclasses of EGFR mutations could help to improve current clinical outcomes by combining erlotinib or gefitinib with other targeted drugs.

Impact of biomarkers on non-small cell lung cancer treatment

Chemotherapy represents the mainstay of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, but response is usually observed in only one out of three patients. Massive efforts have been carried out to identify biomarkers that might help clinicians to choose appropriate drugs, by identifying potentially sensitive subjects and spare toxicities in patients who are unlikely to benefit from treatment. Low excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) and ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) levels have been associated with increased sensitivity to cisplatin and gemcitabine, respectively, while reduced class III beta-tubulin expression has been associated with taxane activity. Initial prospective studies showed the feasibility of a customized approach based on biomarker assessment, and phase III trials will hopefully provide further validation of this approach. The impact of biomarkers for patient selection has now been well established for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with EGFR mutations emerging as the most reliable predictor for improved outcome. Relevant clinical issues are represented by the identification of patients who can be reasonably excluded from treatment and by the development of therapeutic approaches able to overcome acquired resistance to anti-EGFR strategies.

[Class III beta tubulin expression in nonsmall cell lung cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Several investigators have addressed the relationship between expression of class III beta-tubulin and outcome in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with tubulin-binding agents (TBA).

STATE OF ART

High expression of class III beta-tubulin has been found to be correlated with low response rates and reduced survival in advanced NSCLC patients treated with taxane/vinorelbine--containing regimens. Two studies have shown that patients receiving paclitaxel whose tumours expressed high levels of class III beta-tubulin had a lower response rate and shorter survival, whereas this variable was not found to be predictive in patients receiving regimens without TBA. Conversely, analysis of samples from operable NSCLC patients in the JBR-10 trial showed that cisplatin/vinorelbine chemotherapy seemed to overcome the negative prognostic effect of high class III beta-tubulin expression and that the greatest benefit from chemotherapy was observed in patients with high class III beta-tubulin expression.

PERSPECTIVES

In advanced NSCLC, high betaIII tubulin expression may prompt selection of taxane-free regimens as the preferred initial treatment approach. The epothilones may fulfil such a role in the treatment of NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

betaIII tubulin expression is emerging as a valuable biomarker for taxane resistance in advanced disease, as well as offering prognostic information for outcomes among patients with earlier stage disease.

RRM1 single nucleotide polymorphism -37C-->A correlates with progression-free survival in NSCLC patients after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy

Background

The ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) gene encodes the regulatory subunit of ribonucleotide reductase, the molecular target of gemcitabine. The overexpression of RRM1 mRNA in tumor tissues is reported to be associated with gemcitabine resistance. Thus, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the RRM1 gene are potential biomarkers of the response to gemcitabine chemotherapy. We investigated whether RRM1 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or SNPs were associated with clinical outcome after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods

PBMC samples were obtained from 62 stage IIIB and IV patients treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. RRM1 mRNA expression levels were assessed by real-time PCR. Three RRM1 SNPs, -37C→A, 2455A→G and 2464G→A, were assessed by direct sequencing.

Results

RRM1 expression was detectable in 57 PBMC samples, and SNPs were sequenced in 56 samples. The overall response rate to gemcitabine was 18%; there was no significant association between RRM1 mRNA expression and response rate (P = 0.560). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23.3 weeks in the lower expression group and 26.9 weeks in the higher expression group (P = 0.659). For the -37C→A polymorphism, the median PFS was 30.7 weeks in the C(-)37A group, 24.7 weeks in the A(-)37A group, and 23.3 weeks in the C(-)37C group (P = 0.043). No significant difference in PFS was observed for the SNP 2455A→G or 2464G→A.

Conclusions

The RRM1 polymorphism -37C→A correlated with PFS in NSCLC patients treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. No significant correlation was found between PBMC RRM1 mRNA expression and the efficacy of gemcitabine.

Microtubules and resistance to tubulin-binding agents

Microtubules are dynamic structures composed of alpha-beta-tubulin heterodimers that are essential in cell division and are important targets for cancer drugs. Mutations in beta-tubulin that affect microtubule polymer mass and/or drug binding are associated with resistance to tubulin-binding agents such as paclitaxel. The aberrant expression of specific beta-tubulin isotypes, in particular betaIII-tubulin, or of microtubule-regulating proteins is important clinically in tumour aggressiveness and resistance to chemotherapy. In addition, changes in actin regulation can also mediate resistance to tubulin-binding agents. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that mediate resistance to tubulin-binding agents will be vital to improve the efficacy of these agents.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

The purpose of this article is to provide updated recommendations for the treatment of patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. A literature search identified relevant randomized trials published since 2002. The scope of the guideline was narrowed to chemotherapy and biologic therapy. An Update Committee reviewed the literature and made updated recommendations. One hundred sixty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations were based on treatment strategies that improve overall survival. Treatments that improve only progression-free survival prompted scrutiny of toxicity and quality of life. For first-line therapy in patients with performance status of 0 or 1, a platinum-based two-drug combination of cytotoxic drugs is recommended. Nonplatinum cytotoxic doublets are acceptable for patients with contraindications to platinum therapy. For patients with performance status of 2, a single cytotoxic drug is sufficient. Stop first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy at disease progression or after four cycles in patients who are not responding to treatment. Stop two-drug cytotoxic chemotherapy at six cycles even in patients who are responding to therapy. The first-line use of gefitinib may be recommended for patients with known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation; for negative or unknown EGFR mutation status, cytotoxic chemotherapy is preferred. Bevacizumab is recommended with carboplatin-paclitaxel, except for patients with certain clinical characteristics. Cetuximab is recommended with cisplatin-vinorelbine for patients with EGFR-positive tumors by immunohistochemistry. Docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, or pemetrexed is recommended as second-line therapy. Erlotinib is recommended as third-line therapy for patients who have not received prior erlotinib or gefitinib. Data are insufficient to recommend the routine third-line use of cytotoxic drugs. Data are insufficient to recommend routine use of molecular markers to select chemotherapy.

Molecular predictive and prognostic markers in non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer death in the developed world. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the therapeutic foundation of treatment both in the metastatic and adjuvant setting and targeted therapies are entering standard treatment paradigms. However, many patients do not obtain benefit from cytotoxic agents or newer targeted therapies, but are still exposed to their toxic effects. Reliable biomarkers to select treatments for patients most likely to obtain benefit have, therefore, been an important focus for many research groups. In this paper, we review current predictive and prognostic biomarkers in NSCLC. We assess their potential clinical use and explore recent data pertaining to genome-wide approaches for treatment selection in NSCLC.

The role of betaIII tubulin in predicting chemoresistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a leading cause of death among adults. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancer cases. For more than half of all patients diagnosis does not occur until the disease has metastasised. At this advanced stage, the 5-year survival rate is just 15%. Platinum-based chemotherapy forms the backbone of treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC and forms an important component of the therapeutic regimen for many patients with earlier stage disease. However, although a number of agents are available to partner the platinum-based compounds, treatment selection is largely empiric, and chemoresistance is a considerable barrier to improving outcomes. The identification of biologic and other markers to guide treatment selection, thus ensuring patients receive the most effective regimen for their individual tumour and avoid exposure to toxic agents from which they are unlikely to benefit, will be critical to improve outcomes for patients with NSCLC. The development of alternative agents for those patients who express predictors of a negative clinical response is of vital importance. A variety of biomarkers are emerging, including expression of DNA repair enzymes, ribonucleotide subunits and betaIII tubulin. Treatment algorithms based on elucidation of such markers to guide treatment selection can already be envisaged. For example, those patients with high betaIII tubulin expression should be considered for epothilone therapy as an alternative to taxane-based regimens. The epothilones may be preferred option as the evidence suggests that these agents retain activity versus taxane-resistant cancers. This paper reviews the evidence base for betaIII tubulin expression as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in NSCLC and briefly explores the implications for clinical decision making of this and other emerging biomarkers.

Clinical pharmacology and pharmacogenetics of gemcitabine

Gemcitabine is a cytotoxic nucleoside analog, which is widely used in the treatment of malignancies. Interindividual differences in gemcitabine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have been demonstrated. Pharmacogenetic factors may account for a significant proportion of these differences. This review provides an update on the pharmacogenetics of gemcitabine and its influence on gemcitabine efficacy and toxicity.

The prognostic significance of ERCC1, BRCA1, XRCC1, and betaIII-tubulin expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by platinum- and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection

OBJECTIVES

The DNA repair pathway and isotype composition of beta-tubulin are known to be associated with resistance to platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy, respectively. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical significance of excision repair cross-complementation 1 (ERCC1), breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1), X-ray repair cross-complementation 1 (XRCC1) and betaIII-tubulin on the chemotherapy response and overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Protein expression profiles were evaluated by immunohistochemistry on surgical specimens of 82 NSCLC patients who underwent platinum- and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The expression levels of proteins were measured semi-quantitatively and the correlation with tumor responses, pathologic cell death rate and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 73 (89.0%) clinical stage III patients. Lobectomy, bilobectomy, and pneumonectomy were performed in 54 (65.0%), 11 (13.4%), and 17 (20.7%) patients, respectively. There was no correlation between clinical response and protein expression. The expression levels of ERCC1, BRCA1, and XRCC1 increased proportionally to the cell death rate (p<0.05); however, betaIII-tubulin expression did not correlate with cell viability. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that early pathologic stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, high ERCC1 and low betaIII-tubulin expression were good prognostic factors for overall survival (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The inverse correlation between DNA repair proteins and cell viability suggests that these protein expression levels can be markers for chemotherapy responsiveness. However, only ERCC1 and betaIII-tubulin were prognostic factors after platinum- and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy following surgical resection.