Mobilization and harvesting of peripheral blood stem cells: randomized evaluations of different doses of filgrastim

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim

Myelosuppressive chemotherapy is frequently used for mobilization of autologous CD34(+) progenitor cells into the peripheral blood for subsequent collection and support of high-dose chemotherapy. The administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy is typically followed by a myeloid growth factor and is associated with variable CD34 cell yields and morbidity. The two most commonly used myeloid growth factors for facilitation of CD34 cell harvests are granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). We performed a randomized phase III clinical trial comparing G-CSF, GM-CSF, and sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF following administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. We evaluated CD34 yields, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness of the three cytokine schedules. One hundred and fifty-six patients with multiple myeloma, breast cancer, or lymphoma received cyclophosphamide with either paclitaxel or etoposide and were randomized to receive G-CSF 6 microg/kg/day s.c., GM-CSF 250 microg/m(2)/day s.c., or GM-CSF for 6 days followed by G-CSF until completion of the stem cell harvest. Compared with patients who received GM-CSF, patients who received G-CSF had faster recovery of absolute neutrophil count to 0.5 x 10(9) per liter (median of 11 vs14 days, P = 0.0001) with fewer patients requiring red blood cell transfusions (P= 0.008); fewer patients with fever (18% vs 52%, P = 0.001); fewer hospital admissions (20% vs 42%, P = 0.13); and less intravenous antibiotic therapy (24% vs 59%, P = 0.001). Patients who received G-CSF also yielded more CD34 cells (median 7.1 vs 2.0 x 10(6) kg per apheresis, P = 0.0001) and a higher percentage achieved 2.5 x 10(6) CD34 cells per kilogram (94% vs 78%, P = 0.21) and 5 x 10(6) CD34 cells per kilogram (88% vs 53%, P = 0.01) or more CD34 cells per kilogram with fewer aphereses (median 2 vs 3, P = 0.002) and fewer days of growth factor treatment (median 12 vs 14, P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving G-CSF alone and the sequential regimen. After high-dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral blood stem cells mobilized with G-CSF or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of CD34 cells and had faster platelet recovery with fewer patients requiring platelet transfusions than patients receiving peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by GM-CSF. In summary, G-CSF alone is superior to GM-CSF alone for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. An economic analysis evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these three effective schedules is ongoing at the time of this writing.

Clinical practice and future needs in recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment: a review of randomized trials in clinical haemato-oncology

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) may have a significant impact on preventing infections associated with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, as well as shortening time to tree lineage engraftment following high-dose chemotherapy and progenitor transplantation. However, the scientific literature documenting evidence-based practice is insufficient and often misinterpreted. This review presents data and discusses the evidence for actual clinical practice in the use of rHuG-CSF in conventional cyclic chemotherapy, either prophylactic or therapeutic, and high-dose therapy, either in priming for mobilization or post-transplantation. In the past decade, many reports have based their conclusions on surrogate markers, and it is time to move towards evaluation of clinically relevant factors. Data must be generated prospectively based on current clinical practice, and several issues must be considered and evaluated to define the true clinical benefit of rHuG-CSF with or without stem-cell support. Evaluation should include complications and needs for resources as well as impact on toxicity and efficacy of conventional or high-dose chemotherapy.

Using peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) for transplantation in pediatric patients: a state-of-the-art review

This paper presents a state-of-the-art review of using mobilized-peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) for transplantation in children. Our own data and those from Medline searches and meeting reports, are analyzed and presented for the different sections that involve transplantation. Recommendations concerning the choice of mobilization regimens, venous access, priming of separator extracorporeal line, anticoagulation, and number of CD34+ cells to infuse for rapid engraftment are proposed. In the allogeneic setting, we analyze ethical and safety aspects of pediatric donor mobilization and collection. Data from the literature suggest that the use of cytokine-mobilized PBPC for allogeneic transplantation appears to be safe both for pediatric donors and patients leading a rapid hematopoietic engraftment with a similar incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The high incidence of chronic GVHD and its management emerge as the most concerning aspect in allogeneic PBPC transplantation.

Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF

PURPOSE

Patient response to hematopoietic progenitor-cell mobilizing regimens seems to vary considerably, making comparison between regimens difficult. To eliminate this inter-patient variability, we designed a cross-over trial and prospectively compared the number of progenitors mobilized into blood after granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) days 1 to 12 plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) days 7 to 12 (regimen G) with the number of progenitors after cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF days 3 to 14 (regimen C) in the same patient.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were randomized to receive either regimen G or C first (G1 and C1, respectively) and underwent two leukaphereses. After a washout period, patients were then crossed over to the alternate regimen (C2 and G2, respectively) and underwent two additional leukaphereses. The hematopoietic progenitor-cell content of each collection was determined. In addition, toxicity and charges were tracked.

RESULTS

Regimen C (n = 50) resulted in mobilization of more CD34(+) cells (2.7-fold/kg/apheresis), erythroid burst-forming units (1.8-fold/kg/apheresis), and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (2.2-fold/kg/apheresis) compared with regimen G given to the same patients (n = 46; paired t test, P<.01 for all comparisons). Compared with regimen G, regimen C resulted in better mobilization, whether it was given first (P =.025) or second (P =.02). The ability to achieve a target collection of > or =2x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg using two leukaphereses was 50% after G1 and 90% after C1. Three of the seven patients in whom mobilization was poor after G1 had > or =2x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg with two leukaphereses after C2. In contrast, when regimen G was given second (G2), seven out of 10 patients failed to achieve the target CD34(+) cell dose despite adequate collections after C1. Thirty percent of the patients (nine of 29) given regimen C were admitted to the hospital because of neutropenic fever for a median duration of 4 days (range, 2 to 10 days). The higher cost of regimen C was balanced by higher CD34(+) cell yield, resulting in equivalent charges based on cost per CD34(+) cell collected.

CONCLUSION

We report the first clinical trial that used a cross-over design showing that high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF results in mobilization of more progenitors then GM-CSF plus G-CSF when tested in the same patient regardless of sequence of administration, although the regimen is associated with greater morbidity. Patients who fail to achieve adequate mobilization after regimen G can be treated with regimen C as an effective salvage regimen, whereas patients who fail regimen C are unlikely to benefit from subsequent treatment with regimen G. The cross-over design allowed detection of significant differences between regimens in a small cohort of patients and should be considered in design of future comparisons of mobilization regimens.

Therapy-related myelodysplasia and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia after high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic progenitor-cell support for lymphoid malignancies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for therapy-related myelodysplasia (tMDS) and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML), after high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous bone marrow or peripheral-blood progenitor-cell support, in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1985 and November 1996, 230 patients underwent HDT comprising cyclophosphamide therapy and total-body irradiation, with autologous hematopoietic progenitor-cell support, as consolidation of remission. With a median follow-up of 6 years, 27 (12%) developed tMDS or sAML.

RESULTS

Median time to development of tMDS or sAML was 4.4 years (range, 11 months to 8.8 years) after HDT. Karyotyping (performed in 24 cases) at diagnosis of tMDS or sAML revealed complex karyotypes in 18 patients. Seventeen patients had monosomy 5/5q-, 15 had -7/7q-, seven had -18/18q-, seven had -13/13q-, and four had -20/20q-. Twenty-one patients died from complications of tMDS or sAML or treatment for tMDS or sAML, at a median of 10 months (range, 0 to 26 months). Sixteen died without evidence of recurrent lymphoma. Six patients were alive at a median follow-up of 6 months (range, 2 to 22 months) after diagnosis of tMDS or sAML. On multivariate analysis, prior fludarabine therapy (P =.009) and older age (P =.02) were associated with the development of tMDS or sAML. Increased interval from diagnosis to HDT and bone marrow involvement at diagnosis were of borderline significance (P =.05 and.07, respectively).

CONCLUSION

tMDS and sAML are serious complications of HDT for NHL and are associated with very poor prognosis. Alternative strategies for reducing their incidence and for treatment are needed.

Lenograstim-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells in volunteer donors: an open label randomized split dose escalating study

Mobilization of peripheral blood cell progenitor cells was investigated in 36 healthy sibling donors using three different split doses of glycosylated rhG-CSF (lenograstim). The donors were randomized into three groups: group 1 was given lenograstim at 8, group 2 at 11 and group 3 at 15 micrograms/kg/day in two split doses, subcutaneously for 4 and 5 days, respectively. Leukapheresis was performed on day 4 or 5 depending on the WBC and CD34+ cell count. We were able to demonstrate that there was a significant correlation between circulating CD34+ cells on the day of harvest and CD34+ cells in the apheresis products in all three groups. The number of CD34+ cells pre-apheresis was inversely correlated with age in group 1 and group 2. However, in group 3, the number of CD34+ cells pre-apheresis did not correlate with age. There was also a difference between the number of progenitor cells mobilized in the three dose groups regarding the time of harvest. Apheresis was performed in groups 1 and 2 on day 5 of mobilization in order to obtain a sufficient number of stem cells for allogeneic transplantation. In contrast, with the split dose of 15 micrograms/kg/day, harvest could be routinely performed on day 4 of stimulation. We conclude that lenograstim given twice a day at doses of 8, 11 and 15 micrograms/kg/day provided different CD34+ cell yields in normal donors, in particular, with regard to the time of harvest. The number of CD34+ cells pre-apheresis was not correlated with age in the group of donors mobilized with a split dose of 15 micrograms/kg/day, indicating that this dosage might also be suitable for older donors.

Randomized trial of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the harvesting of peripheral-blood stem cells

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim on CD34(+) cell yields and morbidity after myelosuppressive mobilization chemotherapy (MC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-six patients were randomized to receive filgrastim (n = 51), sargramostim (n = 52), or sargramostim for 5 days followed by filgrastim (n = 53) after MC with either cyclophosphamide and etoposide (n = 75) or paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (n = 81).

RESULTS

Compared with those who received sargramostim, patients who received filgrastim had faster recovery of an absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L or greater (a median of 11 v 14 days; P =. 0001), with fewer patients requiring RBC transfusions (P =.008), fewer patients with fever (18% v 52%; P = 0.001), fewer hospital admissions (20% v 42%; P =.013), and less intravenous antibiotic therapy (24% v 69%; P =.001). Patients who received filgrastim yielded more CD34(+) cells (median, 7.1 v 2.0 x 10(6)/kg/apheresis; P =.0001), and a higher fraction achieved 2.5 x 10(6) (94% v 78%; P =.021) and 5 x 10(6) (88% v 53%; P =.001) or more CD34(+) cells/kg with fewer aphereses (median, 2 v 3; P =.002) and fewer days of growth-factor treatment (median, 12 v 14; P =.0001). There were no major differences in outcomes between the filgrastim alone and the sequential regimens. After high-dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSCs) mobilized with filgrastim or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of CD34(+) cells and had faster platelet recovery (P =.015), with fewer patients (P =.014) receiving fewer platelet transfusions (P =.001) than patients receiving sargramostim-mobilized PBSCs.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that filgrastim alone or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim were superior to sargramostim alone for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities after MC.

High-versus standard-dose filgrastim (rhG-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cells from allogeneic donors and CD34(+) immunoselection

PURPOSE

The efficacy of a high- versus a standard-dose filgrastim (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or rhG-CSF) regimen to mobilize peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for allogeneic transplantation was investigated in 75 healthy donors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 1994 to December 1997, 75 consecutive donors (median age, 38 years; range, 17 to 67 years) were assigned to two different schedules of rhG-CSF for PBPC mobilization. Fifty donors received 24 microg rhG-CSF/kg body weight (BW) divided into two daily subcutaneous injections (two doses of 12 microg, group A), whereas 25 were treated with 10 microg rhG-CSF once daily (group B). Apheresis was started on day 4 in group A and on day 5 in group B. Target CD34(+) cell numbers in apheresis products were >/= 4 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW.

RESULTS

Cytokine priming and collection of PBPCs were equally well tolerated in both groups. Significantly higher CD34(+) cell numbers in group A with 3. 7 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW/apheresis (0.47 x 10(6)/L apheresis) compared with 2 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW/apheresis (0.25 x 10(6)/L apharesis) in group B were obtained (P <.05). Using standard aphereses (median, 9 L), two doses of 12 microg rhG-CSF/kg allowed collection of >/= 4 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells with two aphereses (range, one to three) in group A versus three aphereses (range, one to six) in group B (P <.015). Donor age, sex, and BW influenced the collection of CD34(+) cell numbers: in particular, significantly higher apheresis results were obtained in donors younger than 40 years compared with donors older than 40 years of age (P <.05). In 65 CD34(+) selection procedures using avidin-biotin immunoabsorption columns (Ceprate SC System, CellPro, Bothell, WA), a median CD34(+) purity of 53%, CD34(+) recovery of 40%, and the collection of 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells/selection were achieved. In group A with higher CD34(+) cells/kg/apheresis, CD34(+) purity, recovery, and cell yields were 60%, 45%, and 2.3 x 10(6)/kg/selection, respectively, as compared with 48%, 31%, and 0.7 x 10(6)/kg in group B (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that twice daily rhG-CSF (two doses of 12 microg/kg BM) compared with once daily rhG-CSF (10 microg/kg BW), in addition to being well tolerated, significantly improves PBPC mobilization, allows the collection of higher numbers of CD34(+) cells with one or two standard aphereses, and facilitates subsequent selection procedures in healthy allogeneic donors.

Successful PBSC mobilization with high-dose G-CSF for patients failing a first round of mobilization

PBSC are the preferred source of stem cells for autologous transplantation. However, regardless of the mobilization procedure used, 10%-20% of patients fail to collect an adequate number to ensure prompt engraftment. There is as yet no standard mobilization procedure for patients who fail a first mobilization attempt. Here, we describe a highly efficient strategy to obtain an adequate number of stem cells for patients who failed a first mobilization attempt. Seventy-four patients with various hematologic malignancies underwent initial mobilization with various regimens including hematopoietic growth factors with or without chemotherapy. In 72% of patients, > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ stem cells/kg were collected in the initial mobilization attempt, and patients engrafted in a median of 10 days for neutrophils and 12 days for platelets. Eighteen patients failed to mobilize adequate numbers of stem cells, defined as the inability to collect 0.2 x 10(6) CD34+ stem cells/kg/day in the first 2-3 days. These patients had their apheresis halted. Patients were immediately given G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) for 4 days as a second attempt at mobilization. Eighty-eight percent of these patients achieved the target of > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, with a median duration of apheresis of 5 days (including the first and second mobilizations). The mean CD34+ cells/kg/day increased after administration of high-dose G-CSF from 0.16 after the first mobilization attempt to 0.61 (p = 0.0002) after the second mobilization. All patients engrafted in a median of 11 and 13 days for neutrophils and platelets, respectively. We conclude that patients whose apheresis yield is <0.4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after the first two apheresis collections can be successfully mobilized if high-dose G-CSF is administered immediately and continued until achieving > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ stem cells/kg.

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for high-dose chemotherapy

Several studies have clearly documented a more rapid hematopoietic recovery with growth factor-mobilized PBSC than with bone marrow. Time to engraftment for neutrophils and platelets average 8-12 days in contrast to 2-4 weeks after bone marrow. This rapid hematopoietic recovery with PBSC has decreased the duration of hospitalization, transfusion requirements, and costs. Although growth factors alone may mobilize enough PBSC for high-dose chemotherapy, administration of growth factor after submyeloablative chemotherapy increases the yield of CD34+ cells. Based on the current data, CD34+ cell content of PBSC appears to be the single most powerful predictor of hematopoietic recovery. Infusion of > or =5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg is associated with a rapid engraftment of neutrophils and platelets, although successful engraftment has also been reported with infusion of 2.5-5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Age, prior radiotherapy, marrow involvement, and prior chemotherapy regimens are important factors influencing the yield of stem cells. Therefore, using these pa-rameters, we may identify the patients who will fail to mobilize sufficient numbers of PBSC before collection and use new strategies for stem cell mobilization. Because of the ease of collection and rapid engraftment after myeloablative therapy, PBSC have replaced bone marrow for autologous transplantation and may supplant bone marrow for allogeneic transplantation in the near future.

Glycosylated and non-glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF)--what is the difference?

Two forms of recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF) are available for clinical use: filgrastim is expressed in E coli and non-glycosylated, whereas lenograstim is derived from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and glycosylated. The function of the sugar chain, accounting for approximately 4% of the molecular weight of lenograstim (and native G-CSF), is not known. Glycosylation of the G-CSF molecule does not prolong its circulation half life. Lenograstim is more active than filgrastim (and research-use deglycosylated G-CSF) on a weight-by-weight basis in in vitro colony-forming and cell line assays. An international potency standard assigns a specific activity of 100,000 IU/microgram to filgrastim and 127,760 IU/microgram to lenograstim. Correspondingly, two randomised crossover studies in normal subjects, comparing mass equivalent doses of the two rhG-CSFs, have demonstrated a 25-30% higher concentration of blood stem cells (CD34+, CFU-GM) during lenograstim administration. No difference in side effects was observed. Results from a prospective, randomised, non-crossover trial in breast cancer patients suggest that bioequivalent doses of filgrastim and lenograstim have a similar effect on mobilisation of CD34+ cells and immature CD34+ cell subsets, respectively. Although comparisons outside the setting of stem cell mobilisation are lacking, the clinical relevance of the greater specific activity of lenograstim may thus be limited. The difference in potency between microgram identical doses of the two rhG-CSFs makes dosing in biological units (IU) rather than mass units (microgram) more appropriate.

Factors associated with successful mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in 200 patients with lymphoid malignancies

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were mobilized and harvested in 200 patients treated for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 148), Hodgkin's disease (n = 22) and multiple myeloma (n = 30). The variables predicting the collection of a minimal (>2.5 x 10(6)/kg) or a high (>10 x 10(6)/kg) CD34+ cell count were analysed. Patients were mobilized with haemopoietic growth factors following either standard chemotherapy (n = 49) or high-dose cyclophosphamide, given alone (n = 55) or combined with high-dose VP16 (n = 86). 10 patients received haemopoietic growth factors only. The first mobilization resulted in a PBPC harvest with enough CD34+ cells in 179/200 patients (90%). High-dose cyclophosphamide, with or without VP16, did not mobilize a higher progenitor cell yield than standard chemotherapy. When performing multiple regression analysis in the 190 patients who received chemotherapy-containing mobilization, only the number of previous chemotherapy regimens and the exposure to fludarabine predicted for a failure to collect a minimal PBPC count (P=0.06 and 0.0008 respectively). The target to collect a high CD34+ cell count was negatively associated with the number of previous chemotherapy regimens (P=0.002). When only non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients were considered for multivariate analysis, low-grade histology with fludarabine appeared to be associated with poor PBPC cell yield (P=0.08 and 0.005 respectively). This data confirms that PBPC harvest should be planned early in the disease course in transplant candidates, and can be obtained after a standard course of chemotherapy.

Second attempts at mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with initial low CD34+ cell yields

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of second mobilization strategies in patients who yielded < 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ PBSC/kg after initial mobilization. Repeat mobilization attempts were made with chemotherapy and G-CSF (n = 61) or G-CSF alone (n = 58) in patients who failed initial mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF (n = 92) or G-CSF alone (n = 27). A median of 0.27 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg per apheresis was collected after the second mobilization, compared with 0.16 with initial harvests (p = 0.0001). Forty-eight percent achieved a target CD34+ cell dose > or = 2.5 x 10(6)/kg when harvests from the first and second mobilizations were combined. Fifteen of 17 patients (88%) with > or = 1.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg harvested after first mobilization had > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg collected when first and second harvests were combined, as compared with 42 of 102 (41%) achieving < 1.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg with first PBSC harvests (p = 0.0001). Second mobilizations with chemotherapy and G-CSF or G-CSF alone resulted in similar CD34+ cell yields. Toxicities of second mobilizations were comparable with those of first mobilizations. Seventy-nine patients (66%) received high-dose chemotherapy with PBSC support, with recovery of neutrophils and platelets in a median of 11 and 15 days, respectively. Transplant-related mortality was 4%, and event-free survival at 2 years was 0.34. It was concluded that second mobilization attempts in patients who fail to achieve > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg on initial mobilization were successful in 48% of patients. G-CSF alone was as effective as chemotherapy plus G-CSF in mobilizing CD34+ cells and was associated with less morbidity.

A randomized trial of two doses of cyclophosphamide with etoposide and G-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in 318 patients with stage II-III breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to develop a less toxic outpatient chemotherapy regimen for mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Three hundred eighteen patients with newly diagnosed stage II-III breast cancer who had received conventional dose adjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to receive intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 6 micrograms/kg/day (ID-Cy, n = 162) or high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and the same doses of etoposide and G-CSF (HD-Cy, n = 156) followed by collection of PBSC. Three hundred seventeen of 318 patients had apheresis performed, and 315 received high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by PBSC support. The median numbers of CD34+ cells collected in a median of two apheresis following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 19.9 and 22.2 x 10(6)/kg, respectively (p = 0.04). The fractions of patients achieving CD34+ cell doses > or = 2.5 or > or = 5.0 x 10(6)/kg were not different between the two regimens. More patients receiving HD-Cy had grade 3-4 nausea (p = 0.001), vomiting (p = 0.03), and mucositis (p = 0.04). The fractions of patients having a neutrophil nadir < 0.5 x 10(9)/L following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 0.83 and 0.95, respectively (p = < 0.001). The fractions of patients having a platelet nadir < 25 x 10(9)/L following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 0.13 and 0.51, respectively (p = < 0.001). More patients in the HD-Cy group received platelet (p < 0.001) and red blood cell (p < 0.001) transfusions and were admitted to the hospital more frequently (p = 0.03) than patients receiving ID-Cy. Three hundred fifteen patients received HDC followed by infusion of PBSC. There were no significant differences in the incidence of transplant-related death or early survival between patients receiving ID-Cy or HD-Cy followed by HDC. It was concluded that a regimen of Cy 2 g/m2 with etoposide and G-CSF was effective for mobilization of PBSC with low morbidity and resource utilization in patients with limited prior chemotherapy exposure.