Remission status defined by immunofixation vs. electrophoresis after autologous transplantation has a major impact on the outcome of multiple myeloma patients

Vinorelbine plus intermediate dose cyclophosphamide is an effective and safe regimen for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma

High dose cyclophosphamide (HD-Cy) is commonly used to mobilize stem cells in multiple myeloma (MM). However, timing of collection is variable and incidence of side effects is substantial. We evaluated a combination of vinorelbine (VNB) (25 mg/m(2) day 1) plus Cy (1.5 g/m(2) day 2) and G-CSF as mobilizing regimen in 37 patients with MM. Results were compared to those achieved in 41 previously diagnosed patients mobilized with Cy at 4 g/m(2). Overall, 36/37 patients receiving VNB-Cy (97%) mobilized, as opposed to 40/41 (97%) in the controls (p:0.51). Median CD34+ cells peak was 94/mul for VNB-Cy patients and 96 for controls, p=0.36; median number of CD34+ cells collected was 9.2x10(6)/kg and 8.7x10(6)/kg, respectively (p=0.85). Median number of days to the highest CD34 count was shorter for VNB-Cy patients (nine vs 11, p=0.001). No VNB-Cy patient experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, as opposed to 63 and 19% in the controls (p=0.001 and 0.01, respectively). Hospitalization from toxicity was never required in VNB-Cy patients as compared to 19% in control group (p=0.01). We conclude that an outpatient combination of VNB plus intermediate dose Cy plus G-CSF is a safe, predictable, and highly effective mobilization regimen for patients with newly-diagnosed MM.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma, for all practical purposes, remains an incurable malignancy; however, 5-year survival has improved substantially during the past 30 years. A major contribution to improved outcome is the use of high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. This multifaceted approach to therapy requires an understanding of appropriate induction therapy, techniques for stem cell mobilization, appropriate conditioning and supportive care. Also of importance are prognosis, features that predict outcome, the suitability of transplant candidates, and post-transplantation maintenance therapy.

Changes in multiple myeloma epidemiology in the last thirty years: A single centre experience

In this study we have evaluated 772 multiple myeloma (MM) patients for clinical presentation, response to treatment, relapse modality, and survival in the last 30 years. Patients were divided, according to the date of diagnosis in group I or group II (before and after 1994, respectively) and therapy (high or conventional dose). Bone pain and early deaths were statistically reduced in group II, whereas MM that evolved from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) had increased. The efficacy of high dose therapy (HDT) over conventional dose therapy (CDT) was confirmed through analysis of response rate, progression free, and overall survival. Relapse modality was similar after HDT or CDT. Among older patients, those diagnosed after 1994 lived longer than those diagnosed before 1994. In the last 30 years, the clinical presentation of multiple myeloma remained substantially unchanged. The new therapeutic approaches, chemotherapy and supportive therapy, allowed better control of the disease with an improvement of survival.

New Approaches to Treatment for Multiple Myeloma: Durable Remission and Quality of Life as Primary Goals

New treatment approaches are changing the traditional paradigm for myeloma management. Partial or complete response with first-line therapy is now highly attainable. The focus of attention has thus shifted to obtaining the most durable remissions with the highest quality of life. A critical open question is whether more arduous and toxic therapies are justified with the intent to seek a cure. Patients with minimal symptoms at diagnosis are particularly reluctant to pursue aggressive strategies without documented long-term benefit. Conversely, patients with poor-risk molecular features, such as 13q deletion or t(4;14) translocation, can hopefully benefit from novel targeted therapies. New combinations incorporating bortezomib, thalidomide, and/or lenalidomide plus other novel agents offer the opportunity to explore therapy that is more effective and less toxic than in the past. The efficacy of single and tandem transplantation, which have documented long-term survival benefit, need to be compared with regimens integrating novel therapies. Whether true complete remission is a prerequisite for substantially improved survival is a central question in the framework of planned trials. The ultimate goal is to achieve clinical response (complete or partial) that offers the best quality remission for the longest period. Ideally, more effective induction and/or consolidation treatments will avoid concomitant toxicities and the need for maintenance therapies. Fortunately, new agents already offer longer-term disease control. The ongoing search for a cure will undoubtedly demand courage and dedication on the part of investigators and patients.

Induction therapy before transplantation in multiple myeloma: new strategies to achieve complete response

The application of high-dose therapy combined with stem cell support has greatly improved the outcome of treatment in patients with multiple myeloma. However, induction treatments are rapidly changing, and it has now become possible to achieve complete responses in 30%-40% of newly diagnosed patients before high-dose therapy. The effect of the improved induction regimens on the results of the whole treatment strategy and the long-term outcome will have to be evaluated in prospective randomized trials. The introduction of new drugs such as thalidomide and bortezomib have contributed significantly to this changed remission status and may ultimately lead to a change of concept about the value of remission-induction therapy. In this article, we review various regimens that are used for induction therapy in preparation for stem cell transplantation and describe the impact these novel agents could have on patient remission status.

Prognostic features of multiple myeloma

The outcome of myeloma patients is highly heterogeneous, with survival ranging from a few months to more than 10 years. Accordingly, investigation of prognostic factors may contribute to identification of risk categories and to provision of more accurate information about individual disease outcome. For many years prognostic factors have relied on clinical parameters such as age, hemoglobin level and renal function. Subsequently, biological parameters such as the proliferative activity of plasma cells and beta2-microglobulin have been added to the prognostic arsenal. More recently, cytogenetic and molecular markers with significant influence on disease outcome have been identified. Here we will review the most relevant prognostic factors reported in the literature in patients treated with both conventional chemotherapy and high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem-cell support, as well as in asymptomatic MM and MGUS patients.

High-dose idarubicin, cyclophosphamide and melphalan as conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation increases treatment-related mortality in patients with multiple myeloma: results of a randomised study

We conducted a randomised trial comparing an intensified versus a standard conditioning regimen for high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. In this study, 56 patients were randomly assigned for high-dose therapy with melphalan 200 mg/m2 or with idarubicin 42 mg/m2, melphalan 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg. The primary objective was response rate. Acute toxicity, mainly because of infections, was higher in the intensified treatment arm with a treatment-related mortality of 20% versus 0% in the standard arm. This lead to the early discontinuation of the study. Response rates did not differ significantly between both treatment arms {intensified versus standard: complete response+near complete remission 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26-74%] vs. 33% (95% CI 17-55%), partial remission 35% (95% CI 16-61%) vs. 50% (95% CI 30-70%)}. After a follow-up of 5 years, the median time-to-progression and overall survival were not significantly different between both patient groups. Analysis restricted to patients surviving the first 100 d after transplant showed a better outcome for patients with >or=2 bad prognostic risk factors in the intensified treatment arm, however all treatment-related deaths occurred within this group of patients. In conclusion, intensified conditioning for high-dose therapy had intolerably high toxicity without improving outcome in patients with multiple myeloma.

Long-term outcomes of previously untreated myeloma patients: responses to induction chemotherapy and high-dose melphalan incorporated within a risk stratification model can help to direct the use of novel treatments

Induction chemotherapy followed by high-dose melphalan (HDM) is the standard treatment for fitter patients with myeloma. The place of bortezomib and the thalidomide analogues within this treatment paradigm is yet to be established. We sought to identify patients who may benefit from the introduction of novel agents during their initial management. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed on 383 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma eligible for HDM to determine whether the extent of response to induction therapy and HDM correlated with long-term survival. Early response [complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)] to induction therapy was predictive of overall survival (OS) [median OS, 7.47 years for responders (CR and PR) versus 4.89 years for non-responders; P = 0.035]. The attainment of CR at 3 months post-HDM correlated with a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS, 7.4 years in CR group versus 5.3 years in non-CR group; P = 0.023). This data suggests that, at every stage of treatment, the aim should be to achieve CR. Patients with suboptimal responses could be offered alternative therapy. We propose a multiparametric risk-adapted model that includes response to induction chemotherapy and HDM, for identifying patients who may benefit from novel approaches to treatment.

Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Results from the Japan Myeloma Study Group

We conducted a retrospective survey of multiple myeloma (MM) patients who underwent reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation (RIST) at 11 hospitals participating in the Japan Myeloma Study Group. Forty-five patients (median age, 53 years) were included in this study. The conditioning regimen consisted of a fludarabine-based regimen in 24 patients and a regimen based on total body irradiation (1-2 Gy) in 18 patients. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in 28 and 17 patients, respectively. All patients showed myeloid engraftment. Complete chimerism was obtained in 42 patients. Grade II to IV acute GVHD developed in 28 (65%) of 43 patients evaluated, and chronic GVHD developed in 31 (76%) of 41 patients. Early death before day 100 was observed in 4 patients (8.8%). A complete response (CR) was obtained in 12 patients. The factors affecting overall survival were severe acute GVHD and the response after RIST. To date, 18 patients are alive, with 9 patients remaining in CR at a median follow-up of 25 months. The overall and progression-free survival rates at 3 years were 38.5% and 18.8%, respectively. These observations suggest that RIST is feasible with reliable donor engraftment and relatively low transplantation-related mortality in Japanese MM patients.

Evolving treatment strategies for myeloma

In this article, we will discuss how treatment strategies for myeloma have evolved and outline the challenges now faced following the introduction of a number of novel active agents. In particular, we will focus on how achieving a maximum response and maintaining such responses is becoming a key therapeutic strategy and how novel agents can be used to achieve this in the context of current strategies such as autologous transplantation.

Molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease in patients with multiple myeloma

Improvement of transplantation strategies and a multitude of emerging novel therapies result in a better treatment outcome in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This gives rise to the need for sensitive methods to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) in MM. Qualitative molecular monitoring using allele-specific oligonucleotide PCR for the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) is well established to detect clonotypic cells after therapy or in stem cell harvests. Recently, real-time IgH PCR or limiting dilution based PCR assays offer the possibility to quantify the amount of residual tumour cells. In this review, different qualitative and quantitative IgH PCR techniques will be discussed as well as the current clinical role of molecular monitoring of MRD in patients with MM.

Post-transplantation tumour load in bone marrow, as assessed by quantitative ASO-PCR, is a prognostic parameter in multiple myeloma

High-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous transplantation prolongs remission duration and survival in multiple myeloma (MM), but relapse still occurs at a median of 2 years post-HDT. In order to investigate whether the number of residual tumour cells in the bone marrow (BM) after transplantation can predict the duration of response, a quantitative allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction (qASO-PCR) assay was used to measure tumour load in BM at 3-6 months post-HDT in 67 patients. The method of maximally selected log-rank statistics was used to test for the existence of a cut-off value in the BM tumour load data set. A cut-off value with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) was identified (P = 0.001). The estimated threshold for placing patients into a "good" or "bad" prognostic group was 0.015% (n = 22 and 38 respectively) with a median PFS of 64 months vs. 16. Multivariate analysis showed grouping by PCR result to be an independent prognostic factor for PFS (estimated hazard ratio after shrinkage, 3.91). This study identifies for the first time a threshold of the post-HDT tumour load with prognostic significance for PFS in MM. Quantitative molecular assessment thus may help to identify those patients who are in need of further treatment early after autologous transplantation.

Proliferative activity of plasma cells is the most relevant prognostic factor in elderly multiple myeloma patients

Although multiple myeloma (MM) is predominantly a disease of the elderly, few studies have focused on the identification of prognostic factors in this group of patients. Four hundred twenty five MM patients >65 years were uniformly treated with chemotherapy (MP or VCMP/VBAD). Multivariate analysis identified 4 factors with independent unfavorable prognostic influence: high percentage of S-phase bone marrow plasma cells (>2.5%); elevated beta(2) microglobulin (B2M) (>4 mg/L); age >80 years old; and LDH serum levels (above normal limit). The S-phase value was the most powerful independent prognostic factor to discriminate subgroups of patients with different prognosis. Thus, 3 main risk categories could be identified according to S-phase values: </=1%, 1-3% and >3%, with median survivals of 34, 22 and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Our study also proved the value for elderly patients of the recently developed International Score System (ISS) based on B2M and albumin. Furthermore, the number of S-phase cells helped to subdivide the ISS III Group identifying a subset of patients with very poor prognosis defined by an additional high S-phase, who displayed a median survival of only 8 months. These results demonstrate that elderly patients can be accurately classified according to prognosis, which may be particularly valuable when comparing the efficacy of new treatment strategies. Moreover, our results underline the high prognostic value of proliferative activity of PC, a parameter that should be considered in routine laboratory investigations of MM.

Clinical outcomes with intensive therapy for patients with primary resistant multiple myeloma

Clinical outcomes were evaluated in 89 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma that had not responded to dexamethasone-based primary therapy, who received early intensive therapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation. Results were compared with those of 45 comparable patients who refused or were unable to receive intensive treatment for socioeconomic reasons. Following high-dose therapy, the response rate was 69% including 16% with CR. Survival of 14 patients with CR (median >7.0 years) was significantly longer than those of 47 patients with PR (median 4.5 years) or of 28 patients who remained NR (median 2.2 years). CR occurred in 43% of patients with serum myeloma protein <1.5 gm/dl, in contrast to 7% of those with higher values, a finding similar to that observed previously for patients consolidated in PR. No prognostic factor was associated with PR and, in view of the high frequencies of PR or CR, all patients with primary resistant myeloma should be considered for early intensive therapy. The limited improvement of lifespan and disease-free survival for those in PR indicated the need for further treatment to achieve CR, the major surrogate marker for long survival.

Multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is a malignant disease of plasma cells that manifests as one or more of lytic bone lesions, monoclonal protein in the blood or urine, and disease in the bone marrow. Treatment for myeloma has changed beyond recognition in the past decade, and now includes state of the art supportive treatment and infusional chemotherapy courses, followed for younger patients by high-dose melphalan and an autologous transplant. Patients younger than 70 years can now expect a doubling of median survival to 5 years, a 20% chance of surviving longer than 10 years, and a 50% chance of attaining complete morphological and biochemical remission. Bisphosphonate control of bone disease is essential. Exploitation of the understanding of the biology of myeloma has led to the development of biological treatments, such as thalidomide, CC-5013, and bortezomib, which target the myeloma cell and the bone-marrow microenvironment, which plays a crucial part in the disease's pathogenesis. These treatments will hold the key to future success.

Velcade: U.S. FDA approval for the treatment of multiple myeloma progressing on prior therapy

Bortezomib (formerly PS-341), a promising new drug for the treatment of multiple myeloma, recently received accelerated approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the therapy of patients with progressive myeloma after previous treatment. Two phase II studies of bortezomib used the same schedule of twice-weekly i.v. dosing for the first 2 weeks of each 3-week cycle. In a randomized study of 54 patients, two doses were compared (1.0 and 1.3 mg/m2) and objective responses occurred at both dose levels (23% versus 35%), including one complete response in each arm. In the other phase II study, 202 heavily pretreated patients (median of six prior therapies) all received the same schedule at 1.3 mg/m2. Of 188 evaluable patients, complete responses occurred in five (3%) and partial responses occurred in 47 (25%). The median duration of response was 365 days. The most clinically relevant adverse events were asthenic conditions, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, and a peripheral neuropathy that often was painful. This report highlights the FDA analysis supporting the accelerated approval.

High-dose therapy/autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with chemosensitive multiple myeloma: predictors of complete remission

High-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell support is widely used as intensification treatment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) responsive to the initial chemotherapy. However, there is growing evidence that only the subset of patients who achieve complete remission (CR) actually benefit from this approach. The aim of this study was to identify pretransplant predictors of CR in responding myeloma patients intensified with HDT. A total of 59 patients with chemosensitive disease received myeloablative therapy. The intensification regimen consisted of MEL-200 (23), MEL-140/TBI 12 Gy (21) or busulfan-based regimens (15). Serum and urine negative immunofixation were required for CR. After HDT, the CR rate increased from 8 to 37%. For the overall series, the median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) from the initiation of therapy were 41 and 68 months, respectively. Patients who achieved CR had an EFS (median 47 vs 36 months; P=0.023) as well as an OS (median not reached vs 60 months; P=0.006) significantly longer than those attaining a lower degree of response. Finally, the pretransplant features significantly associated to CR were a low M-protein size (serum </=10 g/l and urine <0.5 g/24 h) (P=0.0003) and a proportion of bone marrow plasma cells of </=5% (P=0.02).

High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

High-dose therapy with supporting autologous stem-cell transplantation remains a controversial treatment for cancer. In multiple myeloma, first-line regimens incorporating high-dose therapy yield higher remission rates than do conventional-dose treatments, but evidence that this translates into improved survival is limited.

METHODS

In this multicenter study, the Medical Research Council Myeloma VII Trial, we randomly assigned 407 patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma who were younger than 65 years of age to receive either standard conventional-dose combination chemotherapy or high-dose therapy and an autologous stem-cell transplant.

RESULTS

Among the 401 patients who could be evaluated, the rates of complete response were higher in the intensive-therapy group than in the standard-therapy group (44 percent vs. 8 percent, P<0.001). The rates of partial response were similar (42 percent and 40 percent, respectively; P=0.72), and the rates of minimal response were lower in the intensive-therapy group than in the standard-therapy group (3 percent vs. 18 percent, P<0.001). Intention-to-treat analysis showed a higher rate of overall survival (P=0.04 by the log-rank test) and progression-free survival (P<0.001) in the intensive-therapy group than in the standard-therapy group. As compared with standard therapy, intensive treatment increased median survival by almost 1 year (54.1 months [95 percent confidence interval, 44.9 to 65.2] vs. 42.3 months [95 percent confidence interval, 33.1 to 51.6]). There was a trend toward a greater survival benefit in the group of patients with a poor prognosis, as defined by a high beta2-microglobulin level (more than 8 mg per liter).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell rescue is an effective first-line treatment for patients with multiple myeloma who are younger than 65 years of age.

Guidelines for the analysis of Bence Jones protein

The detection and quantification of monoclonal free light chains in urine (Bence Jones protein, BJP) are thorny issues for the laboratorian. Immunoelectrophoretic techniques (immunofixation) allow the characterization of the two pathognomonic features of light chains: monoclonality and absence of heavy chains. Immunochemical methods such as nephelometry and turbidimetry are widely used in clinical practice to exclude the presence of BJP. However, these methods are limited by several metabolic and analytical problems. The accuracy of quantitative immunochemical methods is hampered by the heterogeneous molecular forms (fragments and polymers) of BJP and by the lack of reference materials, and the precision of the methods in clinically relevant regions of the dynamic range is poorly defined. Immunoelectrophoretic methods, especially immunofixation, are recommended because of their ability to demonstrate monoclonality and the absence of heavy chains. Immunofixation is also considered the best method to document the disappearance of the monoclonal protein (complete remission). The physiology of immunoglobulins and the clinical relevance of BJP are illustrated in the two appendices to this paper.

Tandem transplants with different high-dose regimens improve the complete remission rates in multiple myeloma. Results of a Grupo Español de Síndromes Linfoproliferativos/Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Osea phase II trial

Between 1994 and 1999, 88 multiple myeloma (MM) patients were included in a phase II study to evaluate a tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) programme. The first was conditioned with melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL200-ASCT1), and the second with cyclophosphamide, etoposide and BCNU (CBV-ASCT2). All patients were in response after MEL200-ASCT1. A control group of MM patients with response to a single ASCT was selected to compare outcomes. After MEL200-ASCT1, 26 patients (30%) achieved complete remission (CR). Of the remaining 48 evaluable patients, 16 (33%) achieved CR with CBV-ASCT2. The final CR rate was 48%. The 5-year survival (OS) was 55%[95% confidence interval (CI) 43-67%] while the event-free survival (EFS) was 28% (95% CI 15-39%). CR status after CBV-ASCT2 was the most important prognostic factor for OS and EFS (P = 0.00001), although no differences in outcomes were detected when the patients in CR after MEL200-ASCT1 were compared with those who obtained CR after CBV-ASCT2. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed improved OS and EFS for the tandem series as compared with the control series treated with a single MEL200-ASCT. However, in a stratified comparison by response, there were no prognostic differences between tandem patients and control patients treated with a single ASCT. In summary, our study suggests that the benefit of a second high-dose therapy course depends on its capacity to result in CR for MM patients who have not attained CR after ASCT1.

The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the therapy of multiple myeloma: an evidence-based review

Evidence supporting the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in the therapy of multiple myeloma (MM) is presented and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published medical literature and for grading the quality of the evidence, the strength of the evidence, and the strength of the treatment recommendations. Treatment recommendations based on the evidence presented in the review were made unanimously by a panel of MM experts. Recommendations for SCT as an effective therapy for MM include the following: SCT is preferred to standard chemotherapy as de novo therapy; SCT is preferred as de novo rather than salvage therapy; autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is preferred to bone marrow transplantation (BMT); and melphalan is preferred to melphalan plus total body irradiation as the conditioning regimen for autologous SCT. Recommendations that SCT is not effective include the following: current purging techniques of bone marrow. Recommendations of equivalence include the following: PBSCT using CD34+ selected or unselected stem cells. No recommendation is made for indications or transplantation techniques that have not been adequately studied, including the following: SCT versus standard chemotherapy as salvage therapy, tandem autologous SCT, autologous or allogeneic SCT as a high-dose sequential regimen, allogeneic BMT versus PBSCT, a preferred allogeneic myeloablative or non-myeloablative conditioning regimen, and maintenance therapy post-autologous SCT with interferon alpha post-SCT. The priority area of needed future research is maintenance therapy posttransplantation with nothing versus interferon alpha versus other agents such as corticosteroids or thalidomide or its derivatives.

The role of stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been extensively used in the past 15 years in multiple myeloma. The IFM 90 trial has shown that autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is superior to conventional chemotherapy in terms of response rate, event free survival, overall survival. Several other randomized studies confirm that ASCT yields superior complete remission and event free survival rates. However, the benefit for overall survival is not always significant because some patients may receive high-dose therapy at the time of relapse. While ASCT appears to be the treatment of choice for younger patients, a number of questions have been addressed in the past few years (optimal conditioning regimen, best source of stem cells, impact of tandem autotransplants, role of maintenance therapy, results of transplantation in patients over 65 years of age or with renal failure). These issues are addressed in this review. Analysis of large cohorts of patients indicate that a low beta2 microglobulin level and the absence of chromosome 13 abnormalities are associated with a better outcome. However patients with a high-beta2 microglobulin level and chromosome 13 abnormalities, the prognosis is poor even after tandem transplantations. Allogeneic BMT is offered to a minority of younger patients with an HLA identical sibling. Initial series have shown a high-toxic death rate and no survival advantage compared to ASCT. However, allogeneic BMT is possibly the only curative therapy. Reports of CR achieved after infusion of donor lymphoid cells in patients relapsing after allogeneic BMT support the concept of graft versus myeloma effect. Therefore, the objectives of current studies is to reduce transplant related mortality by using earlier BMT, better selection of patients, better graft-versus host prophylaxis or non myeloablative conditioning regimens.

Flow cytometric disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: the relationship between normal and neoplastic plasma cells predicts outcome after transplantation

Conventional monitoring strategies for myeloma are not sufficiently sensitive to identify patients likely to benefit from further therapy immediately after transplantation. We have used a sensitive flow cytometry assay that quantitates normal and neoplastic plasma cells to monitor the bone marrow of 45 patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Neoplastic plasma cells were detectable at 3 months after transplantation in 42% of patients. Once detected, neoplastic cell levels increased steadily until clinical progression: these patients had a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (median, 20 months) than those with no detectable disease (median, longer than 35 months; P =.003). Neoplastic plasma cells were detectable in 27% (9 of 33) of immunofixation-negative complete-remission patients. These patients had a significantly shorter PFS than immunofixation-negative patients with no detectable neoplastic plasma cells (P =.04). Normal plasma cells were present in 89% of patients immediately after transplantation, but were not sustained in most cases. Patients with only normal phenotype plasma cells present at 3 months after transplantation and also at second assessment had a low risk of disease progression. Patients with neoplastic plasma cells present at 3 months after transplantation, or with only normal plasma cells present at first assessment and only neoplastic plasma cells at second assessment, had a significantly higher risk of early disease progression (P <.0001) with a 5-year survival of 54% for the high-risk group, compared with 100% in the low-risk group (P =.036). Analysis of normal and neoplastic plasma cell levels is more sensitive than immunofixation and can identify which patients may benefit from additional treatment strategies at an early stage after transplantation.

Multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of the plasma cell characterized by migration and localization to the bone marrow where cells then disseminate and facilitate the formation of bone lesions. Unfortunately, while treatment of this disease is effective in palliating the disease, and even prolonging survival, this disease is generally regarded as incurable. Understanding the basic biology of myeloma cells will ultimately lead to more effective treatments by developing target based therapy. In Section I, Dr. Bergsagel discusses the molecular pathogenesis of MM and shares insights regarding specific chromosomal translocations and their role in the genesis and progression of MM. New information regarding FGFR3 as an oncogene as well as how activating mutations may contribute to disease evolution and may be an important target for novel therapeutics of MM is presented. In Section II, Dr. Anderson elaborates on novel therapeutic approaches to MM also targeting fundamental genetic abnormalities in MM cells. Both preclinical and clinical studies of novel agents including PS-341 and IMiDs are highlighted. In Section III, Dr. Harousseau discusses the role of autologous stem cell transplant in MM. He highlights clinical trials addressing the question of conditioning regimens and the impact of tandem transplants. He also addresses the role of allogeneic BMT and the use of attenuated dose conditioning regimens (so called mini-allogeneic transplants) in the treatment of MM. In Section IV, Dr. Dalton provides an overview of the current state of myeloma therapy and summarizes the different and exciting approaches being undertaken to cure this disease.

Consolidation therapy of multiple myeloma with thalidomide-dexamethasone after intensive chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

After myeloablative therapy for multiple myeloma, progression-free survival is shorter for disease in partial remission rather than complete remission. In an attempt to induce more frequent complete remission, we assessed thalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with stable partial remission after intensive therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with multiple myeloma were identified with disease in stable partial remission after prior intensive therapy. Thalidomide-dexamethasone was given within 15 months after intensive therapy provided myeloma protein production had been reduced by >75% to a constant level for at least 4 months. Thalidomide was begun at a dose of 100 mg each evening, with increments of 50 mg every 7 days to a maximum of 300 mg. Dexamethasone was given concurrently in a dose of 20 mg/m(2) each morning for 4 days on days 1-4, 9-12 and 17-20, with resumption on day 35. The combination was continued for at least 3 months and patients with marked reduction of myeloma were maintained on thalidomide alone until disease progression.

RESULTS

Marked further reduction of myeloma by at least 90% occurred in 12 patients (57%), including four (19%) with disease converted to complete remission. Disease has progressed in six of 21 patients, whose median total remission was 22 months. Common side effects of constipation, fatigue, paresthesias and dry skin were mild, dose-related and reversible.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of thalidomide-dexamethasone reduced tumor mass markedly in 57% of patients with stable, residual disease after myeloablative therapy. Such an effect may produce longer disease-free survival and/or preserve tumor sensitivity to later retreatment with previously effective drugs.

Minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma

Traditionally, response to treatment in multiple myeloma has been measured by the serum or urinary paraprotein and the percentage of plasma cells in the bone marrow. The use of allogeneic and autologous transplantation has increased the complete response rate and overall survival in patients with myeloma, and in order to assess the effects of such treatments accurately more sensitive methods for assessing residual disease have been introduced. The aim of this chapter, therefore, is to describe the available techniques to assess response, monitor residual disease and predict relapse in myeloma. The traditional techniques of paraprotein measurement using electrophoresis and immunofixation are compared with more sensitive approaches involving the polymerase chain reaction for detecting rearrangements of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain region and flow cytometry for detecting malignant plasma cells. Emphasis is placed on the advantages and disadvantages of each method and its utility in the clinical setting.

The Pavia approach to clinical protein analysis

The protein chemistry laboratory of the Pavia University Hospital is specialized in the study of monoclonal components in body fluids. It is closely connected with the research laboratory devoted to the structural and functional study of pathogenic proteins and with the Clinical Chemistry Central Laboratory. The analyses are performed on specific medical request. The analytical approach is mainly based on analysis of patient's serum and urine by high-resolution agarose gel electrophoresis and immunofixation with the possible addition of the quantification of specific proteins. The interpretation of the protein pattern and the final reporting result from the integration of the laboratory data with the clinical information. This labor-intensive approach requires skills in the performance of protein analysis and in the interpretation/referral phase, as well as close communication with the attending physician.

Gene scanning of VDJH-amplified segments is a clinically relevant technique to detect contaminating tumor cells in the apheresis products of multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Contaminating tumour cells in apheresis products have proved to influence the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (APBSCT). The gene scanning of clonally rearranged VDJ segments of the heavy chain immunoglobulin gene (VDJH) is a reproducible and easy to perform technique that can be optimised for clinical laboratories. We used it to analyse the aphereses of 27 MM patients undergoing APBSCT with clonally detectable VDJH segments, and 14 of them yielded monoclonal peaks in at least one apheresis product. The presence of positive results was not related to any pre-transplant characteristics, except the age at diagnosis (lower in patients with negative products, P = 0.04). Moreover, a better pre-transplant response trended to associate with a negative result (P = 0.069). Patients with clonally free products were more likely to obtain a better response to transplant (complete remission, 54% vs 28%; >90% reduction in the M-component, 93% vs 43% P = 0.028). In addition, patients transplanted with polyclonal products had longer progression-free survival, (39 vs 19 months, P = 0.037) and overall survival (81% vs 28% at 5 years, P = 0.045) than those transplanted with monoclonal apheresis. In summary, the gene scanning of apheresis products is a useful and clinically relevant technique in MM transplanted patients.

Management of patients with multiple myeloma: emphasizing the role of high-dose therapy

Treatment for multiple myeloma should not be given until the patient is symptomatic or at risk for the occurrence of complications of the disease. If the patient is younger than 70 years, the physician should seriously consider an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant. Most physicians initially administer vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (VAD) for 3 to 4 months and then collect the stem cells before exposure to alkylating agents. Following stem cell collection, one may proceed with high-dose chemotherapy and then infusion of the stem cells, or one can administer alkylating agents until a plateau is reached and delay transplantation until progressive disease occurs. There is no difference in overall survival between early and late transplantation, but the former avoids the cost and inconvenience of alkylating agent therapy. Double or tandem autologous stem cell transplants may produce better results, but the evidence is not strong. Almost all patients have a relapse after an autologous stem cell transplant, so efforts are being made to prolong the response with a2-interferon or dendritic cell therapy. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is feasible for only 5%-10% of patients, but the mortality is high and it is curative in only a small fraction of patients. Treatment with melphalan and prednisone results in an objective response in 50%-60% of patients. Combinations of alkylating agents produce a higher response rate, but there is no survival benefit. Thalidomide produces an objective response in about one third of patients with refractory disease. It currently is being studied in conjunction with dexamethasone for conventional initial therapy.

Impact of complete remission with intensive therapy in patients with responsive multiple myeloma

Clinical outcomes were assessed in 68 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma of high or intermediate tumor mass that had responded to VAD or dexamethasone-based therapy and were consolidated with early intensive therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Results were compared with those of 50 comparable patients who refused or were unable to receive intensive treatment for socioeconomic reasons. Following high-dose therapy, the rate of CR increased from 6 to 37%, with median survival prolonged by 10 months. Survival of 21 patients with disease converted from PR to CR (median 8.3 years) was significantly longer than that of similarly-treated patients who remained in PR (median 5.0 years). CR of myeloma represents the major surrogate marker of long survival and the primary goal of myeloablative treatment for patients in PR. Twelve of 18 patients with rapid reduction of myeloma protein (T(1/2) < 0.5 months), and myeloma protein reduction to <1.0 g/dl after primary therapy achieved CR (67%), identifying pretransplant features favorable to intensive therapy. Among 35 patients with slower reduction or higher residual myeloma protein, CR occurred in eight patients (23%) (P < 0.01), for whom other treatments should be considered. The kinetics of response to initial therapy should be considered in selecting patients more likely to achieve CR and consequent long survival after intensive treatment.

High-dose therapy autotransplantation/intensification vs continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma in first remission. Results of a non-randomized study from a single institution

The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) responding to initial chemotherapy who received intensification with high-dose therapy/autotransplantation (HDT) as compared to that of those who were continued on standard chemotherapy. From 1 January 1990 to 30 June 1998, 64 patients with MM who were younger than 65 years achieved a response to initial chemotherapy. Due to referral reasons, patients preference or inclusion in trials, 31 patients received HDT as early intensification while 33 were continued on standard chemotherapy. The presenting features were similar in both groups, except for the median age, which was lower in the HDT group (53 vs 58 years, P = 0.007). Complete response negative immunofixation - (CR) was achieved in 12 of 31 (39%) patients intensified with HDT and in two of 33 (6%) patients who were continued on conventional chemotherapy (P = 0.002). Event-free survival (EFS) was significantly longer in the HDT group (median, 43 vs 21 months; P = 0.007). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between groups (median, 62 vs 38 months; P = 0.21). However, patients in the HDT group who achieved CR had an EFS (median, 51 vs 31 months; P = 0.03) as well as an OS (median, not reached vs 50 months; P = 0.0006) significantly longer than those achieving a lower degree of response. In conclusion, this non-randomized study shows that early HDT increases CR rate and prolongs EFS. In addition, these results highlight CR as a crucial step for achieving long-lasting disease control and prolonged survival in patients with MM.