What do sentinels stand for?

Sentinel species are biological monitors that accumulate a pollutant in their tissues without significant adverse effects. Primarily used to measure the amount of a pollutant that is biologically available, they may also increase the sensitivity of an analytical procedure or summarise a complex pollution signal. This paper examines the validation of sentinels, referring particularly to the use of invertebrates in monitoring toxic metal pollution in terrestrial ecosystems. Few studies measure the capacity of a sentinel to quantify changes in ambient levels. Definitions of 'bioavailability' also differ between workers and few note that this may be a highly species-specific measure. Validation requires that the temporal and spatial scales over which a sentinel integrates a pollution signal are known. The sentinel has to be calibrated against source concentrations and this relationship shown to be consistent over the normal range of exposure. This requires some consideration of the environmental and biological determinants of pollutant assimilation. Differences between populations can confound simple comparisons between sites based on native populations. Transplanted individuals, matched for age, sex and physiological state, might be used when the aim is not to assess bioavailability to the resident population. A simple measure of their capacity to detect differences in ambient pollutant levels is proposed to evaluate candidate species, to assess their consistency and capacity to equilibrate with their source. A small survey of earthworms from a well-defined gradient of Pb pollution is used to illustrate problems of interpreting tissue concentrations in sentinels.

The development of genetically inherited resistance to zinc in laboratory-selected generations of the earthworm Eisenia fetida

The capacity of species to adapt both physiologically and genetically to contaminants may allow populations to persist in polluted environments. Such 'adaptation' can have important implications for risk assessment, since it may mean that prediction based on extrapolation of toxicity studies with naïve populations may prove invalid for long-term contaminated sites. To investigate the evolution of zinc resistance in Eisenia fetida, worms from a previously unexposed population (parent) were selected and reared over two generations (F1, F2) while exposed to zinc in the laboratory. Relative sensitivities of unexposed and selected generations were then compared by exposing parent, F1 and F2 individuals to zinc in contact filter papers tests. Calculation of effect concentrations from this work indicated differences in sensitivity to zinc for successive generations, with higher toxicity values (LC(50), LC(90), LC(99)) found for the selected worms. The increases in resistance found for F1 and F2 worms were confirmed in a discriminating dose study. In addition to comparing the sensitivities of the parent, F1 and F2 generations for zinc, toxicity tests were also conducted with copper to assess if there was evidence of cross-resistance between the two metals. Results indicated similar increases in resistance to copper to those found for zinc. Mechanisms underlying the increased metal resistance were studied in toxicokinetic experiments. Results indicated no clear trends between the three generations indicating that physiological responses, other than differences in kinetic parameters, are responsible for the increased resistance found in the selected worms.