Sequential activation of transcription factors in lens induction

Posterior polar cataract is the predominant consequence of a recurrent mutation in the PITX3 gene

BACKGROUND

The authors recently identified three large genetically unrelated families with an identical 17 base pair duplication mutation in exon 4 of the PITX3 gene. Here, they report the detailed clinical phenotype.

METHODS

Affected and unaffected individuals in the three families with autosomal dominant posterior polar cataract underwent full clinical examination and donated blood samples for DNA extraction and molecular genetic studies.

RESULTS

In all three families, an identical 17 base pair duplication mutation in PITX3 was identified which co-segregated with disease status in the family. All affected individuals had bilateral progressive posterior polar cataracts. In one family, posterior polar cataract was the only clinical abnormality but in the other two families, one of 10 affected individuals and four of 11 affected individuals also had anterior segment mesenchymal dysgenesis (ASMD).

CONCLUSION

Mutations in the PITX3 gene in humans result in posterior polar cataract and variable ASMD. The gene encodes a transcription factor which has a key role in lens and anterior segment development. The mechanism by which the mutant protein gives rise to such a regional pattern of lens opacity remains to be elucidated.

Choice of either beta-catenin or Groucho/TLE as a co-factor for Xtcf-3 determines dorsal-ventral cell fate of diencephalon during Xenopus development

Co-repressor Groucho/Transducin-Like Enhancer of split (TLE) interacts with transcription factors that are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS), and regulates transcriptional activities. In this study, we examined the contribution of Groucho/TLE to CNS development in Xenopus. The functional inhibition of Groucho/TLE using the WRPW motif as a competitor resulted in the conversion of the ventral cell into the dorsal fate in the prospective diencephalon. We also found that the neural plate was expanded laterally without inhibiting neural crest development. In tailbud, the disturbance of trigeminal ganglion development was observed. These observations allow us to conclude that Groucho/TLE plays important roles in the induction and patterning of distinct CNS territories. We found that Xtcf-3 is involved in some of the patterning in these territories. We generated the variant of Xtcf-3, Xtcf-3BDN-, which is suspected to interfere with the interaction between endogenous Groucho/TLE and Xtcf-3. The transcriptional activation of the Xtcf-3-target genes in response to endogenous Wnt/beta-catenin signaling by the overexpression of Xtcf-3BDN- led to a reduction of the ventral diencephalon. This result indicates that transcriptional repression by the Groucho/TLE-Xtcf-3 complex is important for ventral diencephalon patterning. This idea is supported by the finding that the overexpression of the dominant-negative form of Xtcf-3 or axil causes the expansion of the ventral diencephalon. Based on these data, we propose that the localized activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, which converts Tcf from a repressor to an activator, is required for the establishment of dorsal-ventral patterning in the prospective diencephalon.

A spontaneous mutation affects programmed cell death during development of the rat eye

We have discovered a spontaneous mutation in the Sprague-Dawley rat with a novel eye phenotype that we have named Nuc1. The Nuc1 mutation behaves as a single semi-dominant locus with an intermediate phenotype in the heterozygotes. Heterozygotes exhibit nuclear cataracts. Homozygous Nuc1 rats are fully viable and have microphthalmia, retinal abnormalities and disruption of lens structure shortly before birth. The homozygous mutant shows no obvious pathology outside of the eye, indicating that the mutation is highly eye specific in its effects. An unusual feature of the mutation is that it prevents the normal programmed loss of nuclei from lens fiber cells, but does not affect the loss of other organelles. TUNEL, light, and electron microscopic studies show normal intact nuclei in lens fibers, in contrast to many other models with degenerate nuclei and unlike normal lenses where no such nuclei remain. The beaded filament protein, filensin, is down-regulated in fibers of Nuc1, while heat shock cognate 70 is up-regulated. Homozygous retinas are thicker than normal, and TUNEL labeling indicates roughly half the number of apoptotic cells compared to a wild-type retina. The transient layer of Chievitz persists in adult Nuc1 retina, indicative of delayed development. Hence, Nuc1 is a novel mutation that could be an eye-specific regulator of apoptosis.

Zebrafish pitx3 is necessary for normal lens and retinal development

The human PITX3 gene encodes a bicoid-like homeodomain transcription factor associated with a variety of congenital ocular conditions, including anterior segment dysgenesis, Peter's anomaly, and cataracts. We identified a zebrafish pitx3 gene encoding a protein (Pitx3) that possesses 63% amino acid identity with human PITX3. The zebrafish pitx3 gene encompasses approximately 16.5kb on chromosome 13 and consists of four exons, which is similar to the genomic organization of other pitx genes. Expression of the zebrafish pitx3 gene was studied by in situ mRNA hybridization and RT-PCR. The pitx3 transcripts were detected throughout development with the greatest level of expression occurring in the developing lens and brain at 24hpf. In adults, the highest expression was detected in the eye. Morpholinos were used to knockdown expression of the Pitx3 protein and a control morpholino that contains five mismatched bases was used to confirm the specificity of the phenotypes. The morphants had small eyes, misshapen heads and reduced jaws and fins relative to controls. The morphants exhibited abnormalities in lens development and their retinas contained pyknotic nuclei accompanied by a reduction in the number of cells in different neuronal classes. This suggests the lens is required for retinal development or Pitx3 has an unexpected role in retinal cell differentiation or survival. These results demonstrate zebrafish pitx3 represents a true ortholog of the human PITX3 gene and the general function of the Pitx3 protein in lens development is conserved between mammals and the teleost fish.

Roles of Maf family proteins in lens development

Lens provides a good model for studying developmental cues relevant to cellular and molecular interactions. Basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors have been found to play key roles during eye formation in various species, including human, mouse, rat, Xenopus, zebrafish, chick, and quail. Different ocular developmental anomalies associated with MAF mutation in human implicate its active role during eye development. Several members of the maf gene family with this bZIP motif participate directly in lens morphogenesis. One vital Maf protein, L-Maf, is expressed in developing lens cells of chick embryos. Its homolog recently has been detected in lens placode of Xenopus embryos and regulates expression of lens fiber-specific genes in this species. Ectopic expression of L-Maf can induce lens-specific genes in cultured retina cells and embryonic ectoderm. The dominant-negative form of L-Maf causes the suppression of crystallin expression and subsequently inhibits lens formation, indicating that L-Maf plays a central role in chick lens development.

Generation of structures formed by lens and retinal cells differentiating from embryonic stem cells

Embryonic stem cells have the potential to give rise to all cell lineages when introduced into the early embryo. They also give rise to a limited number of different cell types in vitro in specialized culture systems. In this study, we established a culture system in which a structure consisting of lens, neural retina, and pigmented retina was efficiently induced from embryonic stem cells. Refractile cell masses containing lens and neural retina were surrounded by retinal pigment epithelium layers and, thus, designated as eye-like structures. Developmental processes required for eye development appear to proceed in this culture system, because the formation of the eye-like structures depended on the expression of Pax6, a key transcription factor for eye development. The present culture system opens up the possibility of examining early stages of eye development and also of producing cells for use in cellular therapy for various diseases of the eye.

Synergistic transcription activation by Maf and Sox and their subnuclear localization are disrupted by a mutation in Maf that causes cataract

Crystallin genes are selectively expressed during lens development. Maf and Sox family proteins synergistically enhanced gammaF-crystallin promoter activity in a lens cell line. Mutational analysis of the gammaF-crystallin promoter identified a composite regulatory element containing nonconsensus Maf and Sox recognition sequences. Mutations in these recognition sequences or changes in their spacing eliminated synergistic transcription activation. The transcriptional synergy was also affected by changes in the orientation of the Maf recognition sequence that had no detectable effect on binding affinity. The interaction between Maf and Sox proteins was visualized in living cells by bimolecular fluorescence complementation analysis. The N-terminal region of Maf mediated the interaction with Sox proteins in cells. Synergistic transcription activation required the N-terminal region of Maf as well as the ancillary DNA binding domain and the unique portion of the basic region that mediate specific recognition of the gammaF-crystallin promoter element. A mutation in the ancillary DNA binding domain of Maf (R288P) that has been shown to cause cataract eliminated the transcriptional activity of Maf but had no detectable effect on DNA binding in vitro. Whereas wild-type Maf was uniformly distributed in the nucleoplasm, R288P Maf was enriched in nuclear foci. Cajal bodies and gemini of coiled bodies were closely associated with the foci occupied by R288P Maf. Wild-type Maf formed complexes with Sox proteins in the nucleoplasm, whereas R288P Maf recruited Sox proteins as well as other interaction partners to the nuclear foci. The mislocalization of normal cellular proteins to these foci provides a potential explanation for the dominant disease phenotype of the R288P mutation in Maf.

Molecular anatomy of placode development in Xenopus laevis

We analyzed the spatiotemporal pattern of expression of 15 transcription factors (Six1, Six4, Eya1, Sox3, Sox2, Pax6, Pax3, Pax2, Pax8, Dlx3, Msx1, FoxI1c, Tbx2, Tbx3, Xiro1) during placode development in Xenopus laevis from neural plate to late tail bud stages. Out of all genes investigated, only the expression of Eya1, Six1, and Six4 is maintained in all types of placode (except the lens) throughout embryonic development, suggesting that they may promote generic placodal properties and that their crescent-shaped expression domain surrounding the neural plate defines a panplacodal primordium from which all types of placode originate. Double-labeling procedures were employed to reveal the precise position of this panplacodal primordium relative to neural plate, neural crest, and other placodal markers. Already at neural plate stages, the panplacodal primordium is subdivided into several subregions defined by particular combinations of transcription factors allowing us to identify the approximate regions of origin of various types of placode. Whereas some types of placode were already prefigured by molecularly distinct areas at neural plate stages, the epibranchial, otic, and lateral line placodes arise from a common posterior placodal area (characterized by Pax8 and Pax2 expression) and acquire differential molecular signatures only after neural tube closure. Our findings argue for a multistep mechanism of placode induction, support a combinatorial model of placode specification, and suggest that different placodes evolved from a common placodal primordium by successive recruitment of new inducers and target genes.

Molecular genetic basis of inherited cataract and associated phenotypes

Congenital cataract is a leading cause of visual disability in children. Inherited isolated (non-syndromic) cataract represents a significant proportion of cases and recently many causative genetic mutations have been identified. Inherited cataract is known to be clinically and genetically heterogeneous. Eleven clear-cut cataract phenotypes have been described. Cataract may be inherited as autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or X-linked recessive traits, and 12 loci and 15 specific genes associated with inherited isolated cataract have been identified to date; it is likely that more genes remain to be discovered. The identification of remaining genes will not only improve our understanding of the mechanism of cataract formation but will shed new light on the developmental biology and biochemistry of the lens. Furthermore, it is possible that some of these genes will be implicated in the more common age related cataract, which also has a genetic component to its etiology.

The Zebrafish as a Model Organism for Eye Development

In recent years, the zebrafish has become a favourite model organism for biologists studying developmental processes in vertebrates. Its rapid embryonic development, the transparency of its embryos, the large number of offspring together with several other advantages make it ideal for discovering and understanding the genes that regulate embryonic development as well as the physiology of the adult organism. Zebrafish are very visually orientated, and their retina and lens show much the same morphology as other vertebrates including humans. For this reason, they are well suited for examining ocular development, function and disease. This review describes the advantages of the zebrafish as a model organism as well as giving an overview of eye development in this species. It has a particular focus on morphological as well as molecular aspects of the development of the lens.

Mafs, Prox1, and Pax6 can regulate chicken betaB1-crystallin gene expression

During lens fiber cell differentiation, the regulation of crystallin gene expression is coupled with dramatic morphological changes. Here we report that Mafs, Prox1, and Pax6, which are essential transcription factors for normal lens development, bind to three functionally important cis elements, PL1, PL2, and OL2, in the chicken betaB1-crystallin promoter and may cooperatively direct the transcription of this lens fiber cell preferred gene. Gel shift assays demonstrated that Mafs bind to the MARE-like sequences in the PL1 and PL2 elements, whereas Prox1, a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein like its Drosophila homolog Prospero, interacts with the OL2 element. Furthermore, Pax6, a known repressor of the chicken betaB1-crystallin promoter, binds to all three of these cis elements. In transfection assays, Mafs and Prox1 activated the chicken betaB1-crystallin promoter; however, their transactivation ability was repressed when co-transfected with Pax6. Taken together with the known spatiotemporal expression patterns of Mafs, Prox1, and Pax6 in the developing lens, we propose that Pax6 occupies and represses the chicken betaB1-crystallin promoter in lens epithelial cells, and is displaced by Prox1 and Mafs, which activate the promoter, in differentiating cortical fiber cells.

Lens-forming competence in the epidermis ofXenopus laevis during development

In larval X. laevis the capacity to regenerate a lens under the influence of inductive factors present in the vitreous chamber is restricted to the outer cornea and pericorneal epidermis (Lentogenic Area, LA). However, in early embryos, the whole ectoderm is capable of responding to inductive factors of the larval eye forming lens cells. In a previous paper, Cannata et al. (2003) demonstrated that the persistence of lens-forming competence in the LA is the result of early signals causing lens-forming bias in the presumptive LA and of late signals from the eye causing cornea development. This paper analyzes 1) the decrease of the lens-forming capacity in ectodermal regions both near LA (head epidermis) and far from LA (flank epidermis) during development, 2) the capacity of the head epidermis and flank epidermis to respond to lens-competence promoting factors released by an eye transplanted below these epidermal regions, and 3) the eye components responsible for the promoting effect of the transplanted eye. Results were obtained by implanting fragments of ectoderm or epidermis into the vitreous chamber of host tadpoles and by evaluating the percentage of implants positive to a monoclonal antibody anti-lens. These results demonstrated that the lens-forming competence in the flank region is lost at the embryonic stage 30/31 and is weakly restored by eye transplantation; however, lens-forming competence in the head region is lost at the larval stage 48 and is strongly restored by eye transplantation. The authors hypothesize that during development the head ectoderm outside the LA is attained by low levels of the same signals that attain the LA and that these signals are responsible for the maintenance of lens-forming competence in the cornea and pericorneal epidermis of the larva. In this hypothesis, low levels of these signals slacken the decrease of the lens-forming competence in the head ectoderm and make the head epidermis much more responsive than the flank epidermis to the effect of promoting factors released by a transplanted eye. Results obtained after transplantation of eyes deprived of some components indicate that the lens and the retina are the main source of these promoting factors. The immunohistochemical detection of the FGFR-2 (bek variant) protein in the epidermis of stage 53 larvae submitted to eye transplantation at stage 46 showed that the eye transplantation increased the level of FGFR-2 protein in the head epidermis but not in the flank epidermis, indicating that the lens-forming competence in X. laevis epidermis could be related to the presence of an activated FGF receptor system in the responding tissue.

Regulation and differential expression of the c-maf gene in differentiating cultured cells

The Maf transcription factors are involved in a variety of developmental and cellular differentiation processes, but their role in the differentiation of mesenchymal cells has not been described. Here, we have analyzed c-maf expression during the differentiation of adipocytes and muscle cells in cultured systems. The expression of c-maf mRNA was down-regulated during adipogenesis and up-regulated during myogenesis. In adipogenesis, the c-maf mRNA was down-regulated 58h after switching to the differentiation medium and just after PPARgamma2 mRNA was induced. A transient transfection analysis of a reporter gene containing the 5(')-flanking region of the c-maf gene showed that PPARgamma2 represses c-maf gene expression. We previously found that c-Maf, c-Jun, and Pax6 bind to and stimulate the c-maf gene. The PPARgamma2 repression of c-maf expression seems to be due, at least in part, to inhibition of the transactivation functions of c-Maf, c-Jun, and Pax6. The repression of c-maf was partly reversed by CBP, suggesting that these transcription factors compete for CBP or related transcription co-factors. In myogenesis, there was a differentiation-dependent stimulation of c-maf mRNA expression. The increased expression correlated with myoD expression. A transient transfection analysis showed that myoD stimulated a c-maf reporter gene through binding to two typical E-box elements located between 160 and 180 nucleotides upstream of the cap site. Binding of MyoD to the E-boxes was confirmed by a gel mobility shift assay and DNaseI footprinting analysis. Combined, these results suggest that the c-maf gene plays an important role during the differentiation of adipocyte and muscle cells from mesenchymal fibroblast cells.

Tissue interactions and lens-forming competence in the outer cornea of larval Xenopus laevis

After lentectomy through the pupillary hole, the outer cornea of larval Xenopus laevis can undergo transdifferentiation to regenerate a new lens. This process is elicited by inductive factor(s) produced by the neural retina and accumulated into the vitreous chamber. During embryogenesis, the outer cornea develops from the outer layer of the presumptive lens ectoderm (PLE) under the influence of the eye cup and the lens. In this study, we investigated whether the capacity of the outer cornea to regenerate a lens is the result of early inductive signals causing lens-forming bias and lens specification of the PLE, or late inductive signals causing cornea formation or both signals. Fragments of larval epidermis or cornea developed from ectoderm that had undergone only one kind of inductive signals, or both kinds of signals, or none of them, were implanted into the vitreous chamber of host larvae. The regeneration potential and the lens-forming transformations of the implants were tested using an antisense probe for pax6 as an earlier marker of lens formation and a monoclonal antibody anti-lens as a definitive indicator of lens cell differentiation. Results demonstrated that the capacity of the larval outer cornea to regenerate a lens is the result of both early and late inductive signals and that either early inductive signals alone or late inductive signals alone can elicit this capacity.

Crystallins, genes and cataract

Far from being a physical entity, assembled of inanimate structural proteins, the ocular lens epitomizes the biological ingenuity that sustains an essential and near-perfect physical system of immaculate optics. Crystallins (alpha, beta, and gamma) provide transparency by dint of their high concentration, but it is debatable whether proteins that provide transparency are any different, biologically or structurally, from those that are present in non-transparent structures or tissues. It is becoming increasingly clear that crystallins may have a plethora of metabolic and regulatory functions, both within the lens as well as outside of it. Alpha-crystallins are members of a small heat shock family of proteins and beta/gamma-crystallins belong to the family of epidermis-specific differentiation proteins. Crystallin gene expression has been studied from the perspective of the lens specificity of their promoters. Mutations in alpha-, beta-, and gamma-crystallins are linked with the phenotype of the loss of transparency. Understanding catalytic, non-structural properties of crystallins may be critical for understanding the malfunction in molecular cascades that lead to cataractogenesis and its eventual therapeutic amelioration.

Cooperative action between L-Maf and Sox2 on delta-crystallin gene expression during chick lens development

Lens development is regulated by a variety of transcription factors with distinct properties. The lens-specific transcription factor, L-Maf, is essential for lens formation and induces lens-specific markers, such as the crystallin genes. In this study, we analyzed the mechanism by which L-Maf regulates delta-crystallin expression. Misexpression of L-Maf in the head ectoderm of lens placode-forming embryos by in ovo electroporation induced delta-crystallin only in the region surrounding the lens. To define this restricted expression, we misexpressed L-Maf together with other transcription factors implicated in delta-crystallin expression. Sox2 plus L-Maf expanded the delta-crystallin-inducible domain to the entire head ectoderm and simultaneously increased the quantity of delta-crystallin mRNA expressed. In contrast, co-expression of L-Maf with other factors such as Pax6, Six3 and Prox1 had little or no effect on delta-crystallin. We also observed that L-Maf and Sox2 cooperatively enhanced the transactivation of a reporter gene bearing the delta-crystallin enhancer in ovo, implying that L-Maf and Sox2 can induce delta-crystallin through the same enhancer. In conclusion, we report here that L-Maf and Sox2 cooperatively regulate the expression of delta-crystallin during chick lens development.

Suppression of lens growth by alphaA-crystallin promoter-driven expression of diphtheria toxin results in disruption of retinal cell organization in zebrafish

In order to study lens-retina relationships during development, we cloned the zebrafish alphaA-crystallin cDNA and its promoter region. Using a 2.8-kb fragment of the zebrafish alphaA-crystallin promoter (z(alpha)Acry), we expressed the diphtheria toxin A fragment (DTA) in zebrafish embryos in a lens-specific manner. Injection of the z(alpha)Acry-DTA plasmid into eggs at the one-or two-cell stage resulted in the formation of small eyes, in which both lens and retina were reduced in size. In the DTA-expressing lenses, their fiber structure was disorganized, indicating that normal lens development had been abrogated. The neural retina also showed abnormal development, although this tissue did not express DTA. Lamination in the retina did not develop well, and molecular markers for the outer and inner plexiform layers were either abnormally expressed or absent. However, cell type-specific markers of ganglion and bipolar cells, as well as photoreceptors, were expressed in appropriate positions, indicating that initial differentiation of these retinal subpopulations occurred in the DTA-expressing embryos. Cell proliferation also proceeded normally in these embryos, although apoptosis was enhanced. These results suggest that the differentiated lens plays a critical role in the morphogenetic organization of retinal cells during eye development in zebrafish embryos.

The cellular and molecular bases of vertebrate lens regeneration

Lens regeneration takes place in some vertebrates through processes of cellular dedifferentiation and transdifferentiation, processes by which certain differentiated cell types can give rise to others. This review describes the principal forms of lens regeneration that occur in vivo as well as related in vitro systems of transdifferentiation. Classic experimental studies are reviewed that define the tissue interactions that trigger these events in vivo. Recent molecular analyses have begun to identify the genes associated with these processes. These latter studies generally reveal tremendous similarities between embryonic lens development and lens regeneration. Different models are proposed to describe basic molecular pathways that define the processes of lens regeneration and transdifferentiation. Finally, studies are discussed suggesting that fibroblast growth factors play key roles in supporting the process of lens regeneration. Retinoids, such as retinoic acid, may also play important roles in this process.

Distinct roles of SOX2, Pax6 and Maf transcription factors in the regulation of lens-specific delta1-crystallin enhancer

BACKGROUND

The eye lens provides a good model for the study of regulation of cell differentiation, in which lens-specific delta1-crystallin expression serves as an indicator of the differentiated state of the cells. It has been indicated that the SOX2, Pax6 and Maf proteins are the major regulators of lens cell differentiation. To clarify the individual roles of these transcription factors, we analysed their participation in regulation of the delta1-crystallin enhancer.

RESULTS

We defined the major binding sites of SOX2, Pax6 and Maf transcription factors in the delta1-crystallin enhancer and assessed the effect of mutations at these sites in the cultured lens epithelial cells and in developing lenses of transgenic mouse embryos. SOX2 (or SOX1/SOX3) is essential for activation of the enhancer under all conditions. Pax6 bound at the deltaEF3 site is required for activation of the enhancer, while Pax6 at the Pax6U site appears to be involved in the Pax6-dependent suppression of the enhancer. In contrast, Maf proteins are only required for high enhancer activity in lens fibre cells.

CONCLUSION

The distinct roles of these transcription factors in the regulation of delta1-crystallin enhancer would tend to indicate their individual functions in lens differentiation. The activity of SOX2 and the related SOX1/3 is essential at all stages of lens development as transcriptional activators. Pax6, although it is required in all steps, probably exerts complex regulatory effects, since it possesses both the potential to activate and repress. The major function of Maf proteins presumably resides in the activation of the genes in lens fibre cells.

CREB-binding protein/p300 co-activation of crystallin gene expression

Although some of the transcription factors that are required for expression of crystallins during lens development have been identified, the molecular interactions that contribute to enhanced crystallin expression are not yet well defined. In this study, we designed experiments to test whether the co-activators CREB-binding protein (CBP) and/or p300 interact with c-Maf, Prox-1, or Sox-1 to enhance transcription of crystallin genes. Promoter regions from the mouse alphaA-, betaB2-, and gammaF-crystallin genes were linked to a luciferase reporter. Expression of c-Maf transactivated each of these promoters. Of particular interest, co-expression of CBP or p300 with c-Maf was found to synergistically co-activate each promoter. CBP and p300 were less effective or ineffective at co-activation with Prox-1 or Sox-1. Co-immunoprecipitation and mammalian two-hybrid experiments revealed that CBP and p300 bind to c-Maf and Prox-1 but not to Sox-1. The co-activation of c-Maf by CBP/p300 requires histone acetyltransferase activity. Our results suggest that c-Maf recruits CBP and/or p300 to crystallin promoters leading to up-regulation of crystallin gene expression through localized histone acetylation and consequent chromatin re-modeling. In a promoter-specific fashion, co-activation can be modulated by Prox-1 and/or Sox-1. This modulation may help to specify the endogenous levels of crystallin gene expression.

Characterization of the chicken L-Maf, MafB and c-Maf in crystallin gene regulation and lens differentiation

BACKGROUND

Members of the Maf family, including L-Maf, MafB and c-Maf, are "basic region/leucine zipper" (bZIP) transcription factors. Maf proteins contain a highly conserved acidic transactivation domain (AD), and a bZIP region that mediates DNA-binding activity. The hinge region between AD and bZIP varies considerably in length between different proteins. Recent studies reveal that L-Maf, c-Maf and MafB play key roles in vertebrate lens development.

RESULTS

We investigated the transactivation activity of individual factors in culture cells to analyse their specific functions. In transient transfection assays with a reporter gene containing Maf responsive elements, MafB and c-Maf activated higher levels of the reporter gene than L-Maf. However, L-Maf transactivated the alphaA-crystallin promoter as effectively as MafB and c-Maf, and induced the expression of the endogenous delta-crystallin gene more efficiently than the other two proteins. Domain-swapping experiments reveal that the bZIP region of MafB takes part in strong transcriptional activity, while the acidic and hinge regions (AH) of c-Maf collectively serve as a strong transactivation domain. The AH region of L-Maf (but not c-Maf) conferred transactivation activity to induce delta-crystallin gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that despite their similar DNA binding properties, L-Maf, MafB and c-Maf regulate different sets of target genes by complex interactions with multiple factors that recognize cis-elements in promoters. The AH region of L-Maf has a distinct role in inducing endogenous delta-crystallin gene.

Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta mutagenesis identifies a common binding domain for GBP and Axin

Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK-3) is a key downstream target of Wnt signaling and is regulated by its interactions with activating and inhibitory proteins. We and others have shown that GSK-3 activity toward non-primed substrates is regulated in part through a competition between its activating (Axin) and inhibitory (GBP/FRAT) binding partners. Here we use a reverse two-hybrid screen to identify mutations in GSK-3 that alter binding to GBP and Axin. We find that these mutations overlap and propose that GBP and Axin compete for binding to the same region of GSK-3. We use these mutations to examine the ability of GSK-3 to block eye development in Xenopus embryos and suggest that GSK-3 regulates eye development through a non-Wnt pathway.

Pax6 lights-up the way for eye development

Recent reports have exposed the temporal and spatial functions of the transcription factor Pax6 in the developing vertebrate eye. Pax6 is demonstrated to play essential roles in successive steps triggering lens differentiation while in the retina it functions to maintain multipotency and proliferation of retinal progenitor cells. These findings, together with the identification of Pax6 protein partners and downstream targets, pave the way for future work aimed to understand the molecular mechanism of eye development.

Pax6 and SOX2 form a co-DNA-binding partner complex that regulates initiation of lens development

Pax6 is a key transcription factor in eye development, particularly in lens development, but its molecular action has not been clarified. We demonstrate that Pax6 initiates lens development by forming a molecular complex with SOX2 on the lens-specific enhancer elements, e.g., the delta-crystallin minimal enhancer DC5. DC5 shows a limited similarity to the binding consensus sequence of Pax6 and is bound poorly by Pax6 alone. However, Pax6 binds cooperatively with SOX2 to the DC5 sequence, resulting in formation of a high-mobility form of ternary complex in vitro, which correlates with the enhancer activation in vivo. We observed Pax6 and SOX2-interdependent factor occupancy of DC5 in a chromatin environment in vivo, providing the molecular basis of synergistic activation by Pax6 and SOX2. Subtle alterations of the Pax6-binding-site sequence of DC5 or of the inter-binding-sites distance diminished the cooperative binding and caused formation of a non-functional low-mobility form complex, suggesting DNA sequence-guided and protein interaction-induced conformation change of the Pax6 protein. When ectopically expressed in embryo ectoderm, Pax6 and SOX2 in combination activate delta-crystallin gene and elicit lens placode development, indicating that the complex of Pax6 and SOX2 formed on specific DNA sequences is the genetic switch for initiation of lens differentiation.

The Rb pathway in neurogenesis

Cell division during embryogenesis plays a crucial role in the formation of the nervous system. During this developmental process, proliferating neural precursor cells commit to a neuronal fate and, as a consequence, undergo terminal mitosis and adopt a neuronal phenotype. A key cell cycle regulator, the tumor suppressor protein, retinoblastoma (Rb), is involved in both terminal mitosis and neuronal differentiation. Neural development is a complex process involving cell proliferation, cell fate determination and differentiation, as well as programmed cell death. In this review, we will examine each of these processes in turn, focussing on the role of the Rb family proteins to examine their many influences on these events.

Vertebrate cranial placodes I. Embryonic induction

Cranial placodes are focal regions of thickened ectoderm in the head of vertebrate embryos that give rise to a wide variety of cell types, including elements of the paired sense organs and neurons in cranial sensory ganglia. They are essential for the formation of much of the cranial sensory nervous system. Although relatively neglected today, interest in placodes has recently been reawakened with the isolation of molecular markers for different stages in their development. This has enabled a more finely tuned approach to the understanding of placode induction and development and in some cases has resulted in the isolation of inducing molecules for particular placodes. Both morphological and molecular data support the existence of a preplacodal domain within the cranial neural plate border region. Nonetheless, multiple tissues and molecules (where known) are involved in placode induction, and each individual placode is induced at different times by a different combination of these tissues, consistent with their diverse fates. Spatiotemporal changes in competence are also important in placode induction. Here, we have tried to provide a comprehensive review that synthesises the highlights of a century of classical experimental research, together with more modern evidence for the tissues and molecules involved in the induction of each placode.