Olanzapine in the treatment of refractory migraine and chronic daily headache

Decreased Pain and Improved Quality of Life in Fibromyalgia Patients Treated with Olanzapine, an Atypical Neuroleptic

Fibromyalgia is a significant clinical problem associated with generalized pain and significant interference with daily activities. Although a variety of treatment modalities have been utilized, clinicians have struggled to find an effective means of treatment. Therefore, this study assessed the efficacy of the atypical neuroleptic olanzapine for the treatment of fibromyalgia symptoms. To examine the efficacy of olanzapine for the treatment of fibromyalgia symptoms, the charts of 51 patients treated with olanzapine were evaluated for improvements in pain and daily life functioning. At the time of initial assessment, patients had been diagnosed with a variety of medical and psychiatric disorders and a history of neuroleptic treatment. Pain was widespread and characteristic of pain associated with fibromyalgia. Pretreatment ratings on pain and the interference scales averaged 6.54-8.69 on a 0-10 scale. Post-treatment ratings on the same scales revealed significant improvement on virtually all scales. The benefits of olanzapine to improve fibromyalgia symptoms must, however, be carefully considered because there were a variety of side effects (i.e., weight gain, somnolence/sedation) that were of sufficient strength to cause a number of patients to discontinue treatment. In general, the data provide strong support that olanzapine can, in certain patients, improve symptoms associated with fibromyalgia in patients who have had limited success with other treatment modalities.

Medication-overuse headache: similarities with drug addiction

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is a clinically important entity and it is now well documented that the regular use of acute symptomatic medication by people with migraine or tension-type headache increases the risk of aggravation of the primary headache. MOH is one the most common causes of chronic migraine-like syndrome. In this article, we analyse the possible mechanisms that underlie sensitization in MOH by comparing these mechanisms with those reported for other forms of drug addiction. Moreover, the evidence for cognitive impulsivity in drug overuse in headache and in other forms of addiction associated with dysfunction of the frontostriatal system will be discussed. An integrative hypothesis for compulsive reward-seeking in MOH will be presented.

Effect of Divalproex on Metabolic Parameters Is Dose Related in Migraine Prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the metabolic effects of three divalproex dosing regimens in patients with migraine.

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological and clinical studies have demonstrated a strong association between serum lipid levels and the development of coronary artery disease. Thus, it is important to understand the impact of chronically administered medications on serum lipids. Metabolic properties of divalproex, an approved and commonly used treatment for migraine prophylaxis, have not been systematically studied in patients with migraine.

METHODS

Adult patients with migraine were randomized to receive one of three daily doses of divalproex (500 mg [n = 45], 1000 mg [n = 43], or 1500 mg [n = 44]) or placebo (n = 44) for 12 weeks. Post hoc analyses were performed to determine the effects of divalproex on total cholesterol, glucose, weight, and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

The treatment groups were similar at baseline based on demographic and clinical characteristics and the use of concomitant medications. Divalproex resulted in a dose-related mean decrease from baseline in total cholesterol: -5.7 mg/dL or 3% reduction with 500 mg/day; -8.4 mg/dL or 4% reduction with 1000 mg/day; and -12.8 mg/dL or 7% reduction with 1500 mg/day (P < .05 for 1500 mg/day vs. placebo). There were no differences between any divalproex dose group and placebo for mean change from baseline in glucose, weight, or BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Divalproex results in a dose-dependent reduction in serum cholesterol within the first 3 months of therapy, with no significant change in serum glucose or BMI.

Neuroleptics in Headache

OBJECTIVES

To review the mechanism of action of neuroleptics, the evidence for their efficacy, and their clinical use in headache treatment.

BACKGROUND

Neuroleptics and antiemetics have long been used for headache treatment; however, they have not been widely utilized because of general unfamiliarity with them and concerns about their adverse events. With the recent advent of the atypical neuroleptics and their improved adverse event profile, our armamentarium for headache treatment has expanded. In this review, we explore the mechanism of action of these classes of drugs, their adverse events, and the evidence for their efficacy. We also detail our experience with the different drugs and how we use them as both acute and preventive headache therapy.

DESIGN

A review of published literature was obtained through a MEDLINE search on the use of neuroleptics in headache therapy.

CONCLUSION

Neuroleptics have widespread evidence supporting their use in headache treatment and present an important part of the armaterium against headache.

Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of fibromyalgia: a case series with olanzapine

Fibromyalgia is a common and disabling chronic pain syndrome. Although a wide array of symptomatic pharmacological treatments has been used to treat this condition, only modest results have been obtained. Olanzapine has been proven effective in some chronic pain conditions. The authors present a case series of patients suffering from fibromyalgia who received olanzapine as add-on therapy during a 3-month period. Olanzapine (2.5-20.0 mg/day) was administered to 25 consecutive patients (24 females, 1 male) meeting the American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia, and who were receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 68%), benzodiazepines/zolpidem (48%), antidepressants (32%), and cyclobenzaprine (4%), either alone or in combination. Overall, 6 of the 14 patients (43%) who completed the 12-week trial reported to be much or very much improved ('responders'), according to the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale and 7 of them (50%) reported a good or very good sense of well-being. Olanzapine's modal dose among responders was 10.0 mg/day. It was discontinued in 11 patients (44%) due to adverse reactions, most commonly weight gain (n=5, 20%). Our preliminary findings suggest a possible role for olanzapine in treating fibromyalgia. Unfortunately, the beneficial outcome of olanzapine was largely obscured by its poor tolerability, which could be explained by the greater propensity of patients with fibromyalgia to adverse drug reactions, and the greater risk of antipsychotic-induced weight gain among women. Whether other atypical antipsychotics will provide similar symptomatic relief, while showing a better tolerability profile than olanzapine in patients with fibromyalgia, should be further investigated.

Do The Second-Generation “Atypical Neuroleptics” Have Analgesic Properties? A Structured Evidence-Based Review: Table 1

STUDY DESIGN

This is a structured, evidence-based review of all available studies on the potential effectiveness of the atypical neuroleptics for the treatment of pain (analgesia). To determine what evidence, if any, exists for, or against, the effectiveness of the atypical neuroleptics for analgesia.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There has been significant controversy over whether the conventional neuroleptics (non-atypicals) have analgesic properties. A recent review (Patt et al. 1994) did conclude that the evidence for effectiveness was sparse, except for methotrimeprazine. However, that review did not include a new class of neuroleptics: the atypicals such as olazapine, risperidone, quetiapine, etc.

METHODS

A computer and manual search for studies relating to the atypicals and their analgesic effectiveness produced 10 studies/reports. These were reviewed in detail, and information relating to the above problem was abstracted and placed into tabular form. Each report was also categorized by the type of study it represented according to the guidelines developed by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). The strength and consistency of the evidence represented by the 10 studies were then categorized according to the AHCPR guidelines. Conclusions of this review were based on these results.

RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Of the 10 studies/reports, four were characterized by AHCPR guidelines as Type II (experimental), two were Type III (quasiexperimental), two were Type IV (nonexperimental), and two were Type V (case reports). Of these studies/reports, 90% indicated that the atypicals did have an analgesic effect. The overall strength and consistency of this evidence using the AHCPR guidelines was, therefore, categorized as B (generally consistent from Type II, Type III, and Type IV studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the above results, it was concluded that the reviewed data were generally consistent, suggesting that some of the atypicals may have an analgesic effect. There were, however, few double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, and many of the reports/studies had less than 50 patients. As such, this question requires further research.

[A chronic problem-the chronic headache patient]

Chronic daily headache is a frequent problem which affects 3-5% of the population. Until the 2nd edition of the IHS headache classification, the diagnosis of chronic headache was synonymous with the diagnosis of chronic tension type headache. Now one has to differentiate, not only in symptomatic headache, but also between other primary headache syndromes, such as chronic migraine, hemicrania continua and acute persisting daily headache. Epidemiological studies point to a particular importance of chronic migraine and headache due to chronic analgetica use, since both types of headache are responsible for more than 60% of all cases with chronic headache. Although the mechanisms which cause chronification of headache are not well understood, the new headache classification prompts some direct therapeutical consequences: 1) the indication for drug withdrawal and 2) the indication for a migraine preventive therapy. In general, as with other chronic pain syndromes, there is increasing evidence that a multimodal therapy, consisting of patient education, behavioral therapy and pharmacological therapy, is more successful than a singular therapy.