Endoscopic comparison of esophageal and gastroduodenal effects of risedronate and alendronate in postmenopausal women

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery medical guidelines for clinical practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice are systematically developed statements to assist health-care professionals in medical decision making for specific clinical conditions. Most of the content herein is based on literature reviews. In areas of uncertainty, professional judgment was applied. These guidelines are a working document that reflects the state of the field at the time of publication. Because rapid changes in this area are expected, periodic revisions are inevitable. We encourage medical professionals to use this information in conjunction with their best clinical judgment. The presented recommendations may not be appropriate in all situations. Any decision by practitioners to apply these guidelines must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances. The American Society for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition fully endorses sections of these guidelines that address the metabolic and nutritional management of the bariatric surgical patient.

Fighting the fracture cascade: evaluation and management of osteoporotic fractures

Osteoporosis is a bone disorder characterized by compromised bone strength and increased susceptibility to fractures. In the United States, osteoporosis accounts for approximately 2 million fractures and medical costs of $17 billion each year. As the proportion of the elderly population increases, the prevalence of osteoporosis and related fractures is expected to rise. In addition to the socioeconomic costs, osteoporotic fractures often cause significant morbidity and disability. Although low bone mineral density and fragility fractures of the hip or spine are commonly used to diagnose osteoporosis, they do not identify all patients at risk. Wrist fractures are often overlooked as an early sign of reduced bone strength and should prompt immediate and careful evaluation. Improving the identification of patients at risk for osteoporosis and optimizing management of the condition will reduce the socioeconomic and individual burdens of the disease. This article illustrates the importance of osteoporosis screening, diagnosis, and management in patients who have sustained a fragility fracture, with particular emphasis on fractures beyond the spine and hip.

New developments surrounding the safety of bisphosphonates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several new issues have been linked with the use of bisphosphonates in recent years. This has complicated the use of this important class of agents. This article reviews data surrounding these issues and discusses the impact on patient care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Gastrointestinal toxicity has been a classic side effect of oral bisphosphonates. Newer issues such as osteonecrosis of the jaw have clearly been associated with bisphosphonate use, and adjustments to clinical practice need to be made to prevent and address this new complication. Atrial fibrillation has also been associated with bisphosphonates in recent years, but the literature is variable, and the connection is not clear. Limiting musculoskeletal pain is a rare side effect of bisphosphonates, but public awareness has been heightened by a recent Food and Drug Administration alert. Severe suppression of bone turnover is the most recent potential complication, and an increasing literature has made this a much more clinically relevant issue.

SUMMARY

With all the public exposure regarding the various concerns associated with bisphosphonates, clinicians need to be keenly aware of the details surrounding these issues. Patients need to be presented with a digestible synopsis, such that risks and benefits can be evaluated, an informed decision regarding treatment can be made, and possible complications can be prevented or discovered early.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice are systematically developed statements to assist healthcare professionals in medical decision making for specific clinical conditions. Most of the content herein is based on literature reviews. In areas of uncertainty, professional judgment was applied. These guidelines are a working document that reflects the state of the field at the time of publication. Because rapid changes in this area are expected, periodic revisions are inevitable. We encourage medical professionals to use this information in conjunction with their best clinical judgment. The presented recommendations may not be appropriate in all situations. Any decision by practitioners to apply these guidelines must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances. The American Society for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition fully endorses sections of these guidelines that address the metabolic and nutritional management of the bariatric surgical patient.

Scope of drug-induced, infectious and allergic esophageal injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The most common cause of esophageal injury is gastroesophageal reflux disease, however other less recognized causes may affect the esophagus. In this review we will focus on pill-induced esophageal injury, infections of the esophagus and eosinophilic esophagitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Esophageal infections are less frequent since HIV infection has become better controlled with antiviral therapies. The most emergent 'allergic' disease of the esophagus is eosinophilic esophagitis, which has become increasingly recognized in children and adults over the last decade. Eosinophilic esophagitis is a clinicopathologic disorder characterized by a dense esophageal eosinophilia generally occurring in association with upper gastrointestinal symptoms, primarily intermittent dysphagia, and refractory to proton pump inhibitor therapy.

SUMMARY

Drug-induced esophageal injury remains underdiagnosed and should be better recognized.

Safety considerations with bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates are the most commonly prescribed medications for the treatment of osteoporosis. Although evidence supports a good safety profile for these agents, numerous tolerability issues have been associated with their use. This review provides an overview of the safety issues associated with the nitrogen-containing class of bisphosphonates and discusses the potential effect of these issues on adherence. The review specifically considers upper gastrointestinal (UGI) adverse events (AEs), renal toxicity, influenza-like illness, osteonecrosis of the jaw and evidence on how to treat or prevent these events. In clinical trials, UGI AEs, including severe events such as oesophageal ulcer, oesophagitis and erosive oesophagitis, have been reported at similar frequencies in placebo- and active-treatment arms. However, postmarketing studies have highlighted UGI AEs as a concern. These studies show that a significant portion of patients are less compliant with administration instructions outside strict clinical trial supervision, and when oral bisphosphonates are not administered as directed, patients are more likely to experience UGI AEs. Some clinical trials with oral bisphosphonates have suggested that a decrease in the frequency of administration may lead to improvement in gastrointestinal tolerability. In the authors' experience, the issue of UGI tolerability can be minimised by explaining to the patient and/or caregiver the importance of following administration instructions. Intravenous (IV) bisphosphonates have been recently approved for use in osteoporosis, offering an alternative regimen for patients with osteoporosis. Earlier generation IV bisphosphonates (e.g. etidronate) have been associated with acute renal failure. Alternatively, late-generation IV bisphosphonates (i.e. ibandronate) have shown a better safety profile in relation to renal toxicity. Influenza-like illness, often referred to as an acute-phase reaction, covers symptoms such as fatigue, fever, chills, myalgia and arthralgia. These symptoms are transitory and self-limiting and usually do not recur after subsequent drug administration. Symptoms of influenza-like illness have been associated with both IV and oral bisphosphonates. Osteonecrosis of the jaw has also been associated with IV bisphosphonate treatment, particularly in patients treated with high doses. A small number of patients with cancer and osteoporosis using oral bisphosphonates have also reported this AE. As osteonecrosis of the jaw is difficult to treat and is often associated with dental procedures and poor oral hygiene, preventive measures seem to be the best management option for patients taking bisphosphonates.Overall, the safety and tolerability profile of the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates is good, and long-term treatment does not appear to carry a risk of serious AEs. By encouraging adherence to administration instructions physicians can minimise certain complications, such as UGI intolerability. By being aware of other potential safety issues, such as renal impairment, influenza-like illness and osteonecrosis of the jaw, physicians can detect these AEs early in the course of treatment.

Factors affecting long-term compliance of osteoporotic patients with bisphosphonate treatment and QOL assessment in actual practice: alendronate and risedronate

The aim of our study was to examine compliance with a daily dose of 5 mg alendronate (ALN) and 2.5 mg risedronate (RDN) in actual practice, and to determine the causes of noncompliance through a questionnaire. In addition, we studied the quality of life (QOL) of patients through another disease-related questionnaire. The overall compliance rate remained at approximately 40% one year after the initial dose. The rates did not differ significantly between the ALN group (783 patients) and the RDN group (491 patients). The compliances in the female group and the rheumatism group were better than in the male group and the nonrheumatism group. From the questionnaire, 36% of noncompliant patients showed adverse effects (AEs), and the other noncompliant patients stopped the medication in spite of having no AEs. A logistic regression analysis of factors that might have affected long-term compliance included AEs, an understanding of the disease, the method of ingestion, visiting medical facilities, the shape of the tablet, the cost of the drug, and the explanation of the doctor or pharmacist. This analysis showed that noncompliance occurred mainly due to AEs, the inconvenience of visiting a medical facility, unusual methods of ingestion, and a poor understanding of the disease. According to the results of the questionnaire for QOL assessment, the patients who continued the medication for more than 1 year had improved scores for pain in both the ALN and RDN groups. Osteoporotic treatment needs long-term patient compliance. To improve compliance, it is very important that doctors and pharmacists ensure that patients understand the purpose of this therapy.

Postmenopausal osteoporosis: an update on current and future therapeutic options

Recent advances in osteoporosis have dramatically changed the management and treatment of this disease. This article reviews the safety and efficacy of US FDA-approved drugs for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, as well as studies on combination, sequential or intermittent use of these agents. A review of promising agents for osteoporosis therapy is provided.

Postmenopausal osteoporosis. What have we learned since the introduction of bisphosphonates?

Over the past 12 years bisphosphonates have become a mainstay of treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. As a class, bisphosphonates significantly suppress bone turnover and increase BMD at the lumbar spine and other site through their direct inhibitory effects on osteoclasts. Alendronate and risedronate reduce the incidence of clinical vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Etidronate and both oral and intravenous ibandronate reduce the incidence of clinical vertebral fractures, but data from primary analyses for reduction in non-vertebral fractures are currently less robust. Intravenous administration of zoledronate is under late-stage investigation for use in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Combinations of alendronate with estrogen or raloxifene provide a greater reduction in bone turnover markers and greater increases in BMD, but fracture risk reduction has not been determined. Overall, bisphosphonates are well tolerated. The most common side effects of oral bisphosphonates are upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Newer safety concerns about the use of bisphosphonates include osteonecrosis of the jaw and oversuppression of bone turnover. The optimal duration of bisphosphonate treatment has not been clearly established.

Randomized active and placebo-controlled endoscopy study of a novel protected formulation of oral alendronate

Although generally well tolerated, oral aminobisphosphonates have been associated with sporadic cases of severe esophageal injury attributed to pill contact. A novel protected formulation of oral alendronate uses an inert cylindrical shell to prevent mucosal contact with intact tablets. An active and placebo-controlled endoscopy study was undertaken to assess mucosal injury associated with this protected formulation. Healthy volunteers with normal baseline endoscopy were randomly assigned to receive protected alendronate 70 mg/day, standard alendronate 70 mg/day, or placebo for 14 days. Endoscopy was repeated on days 8 and 15. Of 78 subjects, 30 received protected alendronate, 28 received standard alendronate, and 20 received placebo. Mean gastric injury scores did not differ significantly among treatment groups. However, subjects on standard alendronate were more likely than those on protected alendronate to develop severe gastric injury, defined as Lanza score 3 or 4 (67.9% versus 33.3%, P=.009), and more likely to develop a gastric ulcer (21.4% versus 3.3%, P=.015). No differences in symptoms or adverse events were observed. In conclusion, a novel protected formulation of oral alendronate is less likely than standard alendronate to induce severe mucosal injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Efficacy and safety of alendronate and risedronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

This paper discusses the efficacy and safety of alendronate and risedronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

The literature was searched with the PubMed from 1996 to the present, with respect to strictly conducted systematic reviews with homogeneity, meta-analyses with homogeneity, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with narrow Confidence Interval.

RESULTS

According to the results of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs), bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate), raloxifene, calcitonin, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and strontium ranelate effectively prevent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Because raloxifene has been shown to be effective in preventing the initial vertebral fracture in postmenopausal osteoporotic women without prevalent vertebral fractures, it is considered in the treatment of postmenopausal women with mild osteoporosis or osteopenia with some risk factors for fractures. RCTs have also demonstrated that alendronate, risedronate, PTH, and strontium are useful to prevent non-vertebral fractures and that alendronate and risedronate prevent hip fractures, thus alendronate or risedronate are primarily considered as the first-line drugs in the treatment of elderly women with osteoporosis having some risk factors for falls. While it has been suggested that PTH may be considered in patients with severe osteoporosis, the use of PTH in the treatment for osteoporosis is limited to 2 years or less, and it may be appropriate to use other anti-resorptive drugs after the completion of PTH treatment to maintain the skeletal effects gained during the treatment. RCTs have demonstrated that the incidence of gastrointestinal tract adverse events in postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with bisphosphonates and placebo are similar, and also the long-term efficacy and safety of alendronate and risedronate.

CONCLUSION

The evidence derived from the literature, based on strict evidence-based medicine guidelines, suggests that there is long-term efficacy and safety with alendronate and risedronate in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Adherence, patient preference and dosing frequency: understanding the relationship

Adherence to treatment among patients with chronic diseases is currently suboptimal. Poor adherence leads to reduced clinical benefit, a raised incidence of secondary complications and therefore increased healthcare costs. For patients with osteoporosis, long-term adherence to therapy is further complicated by the asymptomatic nature of the disease and the lack of options for patient self-monitoring. Bone densitometry and biochemical markers of bone turnover are assessments that could be used by physicians to provide feedback to patients on the effectiveness of medication. However, these feedback systems are costly and not readily available. Oral bisphosphonates are currently the first-line therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, they are associated with stringent dosing procedures, and some patients may experience upper gastrointestinal side-effects following administration. Alarmingly, approximately 50% of patients discontinue daily bisphosphonate therapy within 1 year, which negatively impacts upon treatment outcomes, leading to a reduced antifracture effect. Thus, there is a need for an effective therapy that enhances patient adherence. The impact of reducing bisphosphonate dosing frequency on therapeutic adherence has been documented in several studies. Data have shown that, although weekly dosing improves adherence compared with daily administration, levels are still suboptimal. Results from two recent studies that have assessed patient preference for a once-monthly compared with a weekly dosing schedule have demonstrated that patients prefer a monthly regimen (67-71%). Their reasons for preferring once-monthly dosing were that it would fit better with their lifestyle (49-77%) and would be more convenient (75%). A novel once-monthly bisphosphonate regimen, such as the ibandronate regimen, may therefore help patients to follow dosing guidelines and encourage them to stay on therapy longer, thereby improving overall therapy effectiveness.

Oral ibandronate in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: Review of upper gastrointestinal safety

Oral daily bisphosphonates carry a potential for gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events, which has been partly addressed by introducing once-weekly regimens. Nevertheless, the need to follow inconvenient dosing instructions every week could still hinder long-term compliance and therapeutic outcome. In addition, survey data indicates that many patients would prefer a once-monthly rather than once-weekly bisphosphonate dosing regimen. Ibandronate is a potent, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate specifically developed for less frequent administration. In a pivotal study in postmenopausal osteoporosis, oral ibandronate, administered daily or with a between-dose interval of >2 months, demonstrated robust antifracture efficacy and an overall incidence of upper GI adverse events similar to placebo, even in patients at increased risk of such events. This and other clinical studies conducted in postmenopausal women demonstrate that oral ibandronate has an excellent upper GI safety profile.

Fracture prevention in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of treatment options

Several treatment options are available to reduce the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women with or at risk for osteoporosis. A MEDLINE search was conducted to evaluate anti-fracture and adverse event data of osteoporosis therapies from trials in postmenopausal women. Among the anti-resorptive therapies, the bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate have demonstrated consistent efficacy in reducing vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk. Once-weekly alendronate and risedronate produced similar improvements in bone mineral density compared with their once-daily counterparts with similar tolerability. Daily injections of teriparatide resulted in statistically significant reductions in the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, and trials of ibandronate, raloxifene, and calcitonin nasal spray showed reductions in vertebral fracture risk. Hormone therapy has demonstrated clinical fracture risk reduction; however, safety outcomes from the Women's Health Initiative study have raised concerns regarding long-term use of these preparations. These data can guide clinical decision-making regarding the selection of an osteoporosis therapy.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to summarize adverse events data of osteoporosis therapies from trials in postmenopausal women, explain that only a few therapies have shown a consistent efficacy in reducing vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, and state that data from the Women's Health Initiative study have raised concerns regarding long-term use of estrogen-progestin therapy.

Risedronate for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Risedronate sodium is an N-containing bisphosphonate that has been approved for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. An increase in the rate of bone remodelling is a regular feature of oestrogen withdrawal during the menopausal transition, but excessive remodelling leads to bone fragility. Risedronate and similar compounds reduce the rate of bone remodelling by suppressing the action of osteoclasts. The antifracture efficacy of risedronate is impressive. In large clinical trials of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis-related fracture(s) at entry, the risk of incident vertebral and non-vertebral fractures was reduced by approximately 40%. In older women at risk for hip fracture, incident hip fractures were also reduced by approximately 40%. Antifracture efficacy develops within the first 6 months, and treatment has been followed for as long as 5 years without deleterious effects on bone. We await reports of experience with risedronate in 'real-world' cases of greater complexity (i.e., in patients with co-morbidities and medications that would have excluded them from published clinical trials).

Drug injury in the upper gastrointestinal tract: effects of alendronate

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by an increase in bone resorption and a decline in bone density, which leads to increased susceptibility to bone fractures. Long-term therapy is needed to increase bone mineral density and maintain bone strength. Safe and well-tolerated medical therapies are required for long-term maintenance. Alendronate, an oral bisphosphonate, has been used for treatment of osteoporosis since the mid 1990s; however, recent studies have suggested alendronate can have significant gastrointestinal side effects. Most data suggest that the risk of these effects is low and not significantly higher than with placebo but there are limited reports that suggest otherwise, in both clinical trials and animal studies. Alendronate continues to remain an important mainstay of osteoporosis therapy.

Channeling and adherence with alendronate and risedronate among chronic glucocorticoid users

INTRODUCTION

Despite the efficacy of bisphosphonates to reduce fractures in high risk populations, bisphosphonate adherence among chronic glucocorticoid users has received limited attention. Moreover, perceived differences in GI tolerability may lead physicians to preferentially prescribe particular bisphosphonates.

METHODS

Among chronic glucocorticoid users (>60 days of therapy) enrolled in managed care, we identified individuals initiating therapy with alendronate or risedronate during 2001-2004. Multivariable logistic regression and proportional hazards models were used to examine factors associated with channeling patients to risedronate (versus alendronate) and with discontinuation (>3-month gap without refill). The Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) was calculated as the filled days of medication divided by the interval of time between prescriptions.

RESULTS

Of 1,158 glucocorticoid users initiating bisphosphonate therapy, demographic characteristics of alendronate users (n=754) and risedronate users (n=404) were similar for age (mean 53 years) and gender (approximately 80% female). Past history of a GI symptom or event was associated with risedronate receipt (OR=2.24, 95% CI 1.15-4.35). After multivariable adjustment, rates of discontinuation (mean time to discontinuation approximately 18 months) and adherence (mean MPR=73%) were similar between users of the two bisphosphonates. Younger age, greater medical comorbidity, and lack of BMD testing were significantly associated with discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall persistence rates were suboptimal for bisphosphonate use among chronic glucocorticoids users and did not differ significantly by drug. Newer strategies to promote long-term adherence are needed to improve osteoporosis therapeutic effectiveness.

Prescription-event monitoring study on 13,164 patients prescribed risedronate in primary care in England

Risedronate sodium is indicated in postmenopausal women for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and for the treatment of Paget's disease. Our aim was to evaluate the safety of risedronate in a large cohort of patients prescribed risedronate by general practitioners (GPs) in England, soon after it was marketed. An observational cohort study was conducted using the technique of prescription-event monitoring (PEM). Exposure data were obtained from dispensed National Health Service prescriptions issued between September 2000 and June 2002. Outcome data were collected by sending questionnaires to prescribing GPs requesting them to report any events that had occurred since starting risedronate, demographic details, indication, start and stop dates, reasons for stopping, suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and causes of death. Event rates calculated as incidence densities (IDs) separately, for Paget's disease group and all other patients (osteoporosis group) were ranked and the difference between IDs in month 1 and months 2-6 calculated. The osteoporosis cohort comprised 13,180 patients (10,934 [83.0%] female); median ages for female and male patients were 73 and 69 years, respectively. The most frequently reported event in the first month of treatment was dyspepsia, being also amongst the most frequently reported reasons for stopping risedronate and suspected ADR. Adverse events assessed as possibly or probably related to risedronate included, six of facial edema and one each of Stevens-Johnson syndrome, swollen tongue, palpitation and episcleritis. Risedronate was fairly well tolerated. Adverse events affecting skin, eye, cardiovascular and immunological systems were identified. Prescribing doctors should be aware of these and monitor their patients accordingly.

Oral ibandronate: a less frequently administered therapeutic option for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a severe condition, associated with significant disability as a result of fragility fractures and increased mortality. Oral bisphosphonates effectively reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture and are generally well tolerated. Unfortunately, patient outcomes are often compromised by suboptimal therapeutic adherence. In other disease areas, reduced dosing frequency has been shown to improve therapeutic adherence. A positive impact for adherence has been observed with a reduction in the bisphosphonate dosing frequency from daily to weekly. However, overall adherence remains suboptimal. Ibandronate is a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate specifically designed for less frequent than weekly administration, without compromise for efficacy or tolerability. This article reviews the pharmacology, efficacy and tolerability of oral ibandronate when administered with extended dosing intervals in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Biological properties and mechanism of action of ibandronate: application to the treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates, with their proven efficacy and safety, are the most commonly prescribed treatment for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis; however, optimal efficacy is often not achieved due to poor patient adherence to medication. Poor adherence leads to an increased risk of fracture, which itself results in morbidity, elevated healthcare costs and potentially, mortality. Although weekly rather than daily dosing of bisphosphonates has improved adherence, there remains a significant problem, and dosing less frequently than weekly has been suggested as a possible means for further improving adherence. Ibandronate is a new bisphosphonate that has a specific structure and set of characteristics that enable less frequent dosing than currently available bisphosphonates. This review provides details of the general structural features of all bisphosphonates and how these are understood to contribute to their functions in osteoporosis treatment. From this, the unique structure of ibandronate is described, along with how this translates into the high antiresorptive potency, favorable bone-binding, persistence in bone, and good tolerability that permits less frequent dosing. Finally, the clinical evidence for ibandronate is briefly presented, demonstrating the viability of less frequent dosing, with its potential benefits for patient convenience and adherence to therapy.

Protective effect of melatonin and omeprazole against alendronat-induced gastric damage

Alendronate causes serious gastrointestinal adverse effects. We aimed to investigate if free radicals have any role in the damage induced by alendronate and if melatonin or omeprazole is protective against this damage. Rats were administered 20 mg/kg alendronate by gavage for 4 days, either alone or following treatment with melatonin or omeprazole. On the last day, following drug administration, pilor ligation was performed, and 2 hr later rats were killed and stomachs were removed. Gastric acidity and tissue ulcer index values, lipid peroxidation, and myeloperoxidase and glutathione levels, as well as the histologic appearance of the stomach tissues, were determined. Chronic oral administration of alendronate induced significant gastric damage, increasing lipid peroxidation and myeloperoxidase activity, while tissue glutathione levels decreased. Treatment with omeprazole or melatonin prevented this damage as well as the changes in biochemical parameters, and melatonin appeared to be more efficient than omeprazole in protecting the mucosa. Intraperitoneal administration of alendronate did not cause much gastric irritation. Findings of the present study suggest that alendronate induces oxidative gastric damage by a local irritant effect and that melatonin and omeprazole are protective against this damage due to their antioxidant properties.

Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of the skeleton leading to enhanced bone fragility and an increased risk of fracture. Prior to fracture, diagnosis is established by documenting low bone mass. In the first section of this article we review the clinical use of bone mass measurements and biochemical markers of bone remodeling in selecting patients most in need of preventive therapy at menopause. Women with high bone turnover lose bone at menopause more rapidly than those with normal bone turnover and are more likely to derive benefit from the several preventive therapies available. The second section addresses the available technologies used to diagnose osteoporosis and/or establish fragility fracture risk using noninvasive bone mass measurement and biochemical markers of bone remodeling separately or in combination. In the third section we review the several treatment options available for patients with osteoporosis, including alendronate (alendronic acid), risendronate (risedronic acid), calcitonin, teriparatide, and raloxifene, and the approaches to monitoring the therapeutic response. The final section deals with fall protection--an often forgotten aspect of management of the patient at risk for sustaining and osteoporotic fragility fracture.

Tratamiento de la pérdida de masa ósea en la mujer postmenopáusica

In this revision, the results of different controlled clinical trials and metaanalyses on the efficacy in the increase of bone mineral density (BMD) and reduction of risk of fracture on postmenopausal osteoporosis treatments are summarized. Most of the drugs studied produce significant BMD increases but with significant differences regarding fracture risk reduction, especially regarding extravertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates and selective estrogen receptor modulators would constitute the first line of treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with previous fractures. Head to head studies would be necessary to know its true efficacy since some results are based on post hoc analysis. Possible side effects, risks, treatment comfort and price in addition to the demonstrated efficacy in fracture prevention must be considered in the selection of treatment.

Optimizing Administration of Bisphosphonates in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates have been approved in the US as oral medication for the treatment of osteoporosis for about 10 years. Efficacy data exists for fracture reduction for the commonly used oral bisphosphonates but not for intravenous formulations. Based on the mechanism of action that appears to allow for longer intervals between doses, it has been possible to extend the treatment choices from the original more demanding daily oral dose to an array of options including oral weekly and more recently monthly treatment (so-called cyclical therapy) and intravenous treatment with various administration regimens. The possibility of treatment with an annual (or less frequent) intravenous administration with zoledronic acid exists. Compliance, adverse effects, and efficacy vary with each administration regimen.

Gastroprotective effect of leukotriene receptor blocker montelukast in alendronat-induced lesions of the rat gastric mucosa

Alendronate causes serious gastrointestinal adverse effects. We aimed to investigate if montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, is protective against this damage. Rats were administered 20 mg/kg alendronate by gavage for 4 days, either alone or following treatment with montelukast (10 mg/kg). On the last day, following drug administration, pilor ligation was performed and 2 h later, rats were killed and stomach, liver and kidney tissues were removed. Gastric acidity, gastric tissue ulcer index values and malondialdehyde (MDA); an end product of lipid peroxidation, and glutathione (GSH) levels; a key antioxidant, as well as myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity; an indirect marker of tissue neutrophil infiltration were determined, and the histologic appearance of the stomach, liver and kidney tissues were studied. Chronic oral administration of alendronate induced significant gastric damage, increasing myeloperoxidase activity and lipid peroxidation, while tissue glutathione levels decreased. Similarly, in the alendronate group MDA levels and MPO activities of liver and kidney tissues were increased and GSH levels were decreased. Treatment with montelukast prevented the damage as well as the changes in biochemical parameters in all tissues studied. Findings of the present study suggest that alendronate is a local irritant that causes inflammation through neutrophil infiltration and oxidative damage in tissues, and that montelukast is protective against this damage by its anti-inflammatory effect.

Pamidronate increases bone mineral density in women with postmenopausal or steroid-induced osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of a cyclic intravenous therapy with pamidronate in patients with postmenopausal or glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

METHODS

We enrolled 86 Austrian female patients with postmenopausal (n = 69, mean age 68.13 +/- 1.14) or glucocorticoid-induced (n = 17, mean age 66.89 +/- 2.03) osteoporosis defined as a T-score of < -2.5 for bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine L1-L4. Patients received a single intravenous dose of 30 mg pamidronate at 3 months intervals. The per cent change in BMD was primary, whereas the safety and the biological response were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Seventy-six female patients (88%) completed study. Sixty patients received pamidronate therapy for the treatment of late postmenopausal osteoporosis and 16 patients received the same treatment for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. At the end of the trial, lumbar spine (L1-L4) BMD increased significantly in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (P = 0.000067), whereas in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis no significant change was observed (P = 0.724). The increase in the Ward's triangle BMD did not reach significance level in postmenopausal women receiving pamidronate (P = 0.0740). However, pamidronate treatment for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis resulted in a significant increase in Ward's triangle BMD (P = 0.0029). The efficacy of pamidronate treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis was also reflected in a decrease in circulating biochemical markers for bone formation, including alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin. In addition, pamidronate was well tolerated with no incidence of severe gastrointestinal events.

CONCLUSION

Cyclic intravenous administration of pamidronate is well-tolerated therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis, and increases spinal BMD. Randomized controlled studies with adequate number of patients are needed to test the efficacy of the compound in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Oesophageal transport of solid dosage forms depends on body position, swallowing volume and pharyngeal propulsion velocity

Knowledge about transit of solid dosage forms (SDF) in the gastrointestinal tract is incomplete. Detection of magnetically marked capsules (MMC) via superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) allows monitoring of oesophageal transport of SDF with high tempospatial resolution. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of body position, volume at swallowing, and oesophageal motility on orogastric transport of SDF. In 360 measurements we determined tempospatial characteristics of orogastric transit of SDFs by a SQUID device in six volunteers. They swallowed MMCs with various amounts of water in upright and supine position with and without simultaneous oesophageal manometry. Orogastric transit time, oesophageal transport velocity and rate of oesophageal retention of SDF depend on swallowing volume and body position at all experimental conditions. At 50 mL water bolus and in upright position, the retention rate depends on the pharyngeal propulsion velocity, and the transport velocity of MMCs in the oesophageal body are faster than the propulsive oesophageal contractions. Body position, swallowing volume and pharyngeal propulsion velocity markedly influence the oesophageal transport of SDF. They should be taken in upright body position with at least 50 mL of water to minimize entrapment in the oesophagus.

[Collagen diseases with gastrointestinal manifestations]

Collagen vascular diseases are known to present with a diverse array of gastrointestinal manifestations. These can be classified as: 1) gastrointestinal damage due to the collagen vascular disease itself; 2) adverse events caused by pharmacotherapies; or 3) gastrointestinal infections following immunosuppression due to corticosteroid (CS) administration. The first group includes lupus enteritis and protein-losing gastroenteropathy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), reflux esophagitis, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, and pneumatosis cystoids intestinalis in systemic sclerosis, amyloidosis in rheumatoid arthritis, bowel ulcer and bleeding in rheumatoid vasculitis and microscopic polyangiitis, and ileocecal ulcer in Behcet disease. In particular, colonic ulcers associated with SLE represent refractory lesions resistant to CS. Analysis of reported cases showing colonic lesions with SLE (22 cases in Japan) revealed that mean duration of SLE was 9.9 years and 77% of colonic lesions were observed in the rectum and sigmoid colon. Half of the patients developed intestinal perforation or penetration, and 6 of the 11 patients with perforation died. The second group includes lesions in the small and large intestine due to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and CSs, in addition to peptic ulcers. As perforation in CS-treated patients displays relatively high incidence with poor prognosis, careful attention to such complications is needed. The third group includes candidal esophagitis and cytomegalovirus (CMV) enteritis. Prompt diagnosis is required to prevent colonic bleeding and perforation due to CMV.

Prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis with pharmacological therapy: practice and possibilities

Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is a common disease that will become more prevalent in the future, with costly implications for public health. Prevention of the disease and its consequences, namely fractures, is therefore, important for both the individual and society. This review discusses: the goals of PMO prevention; the identification of women at risk, including the use of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers; the relevance in the prevention setting of various current guidelines for PMO management; recent data on therapeutic options for the treatment and prevention of PMO, in particular bisphosphonates, hormone replacement therapy and several other new pharmacological agents. It concludes that it is crucial for PMO prevention to start before disease onset and that, in the light of recent evidence, the existing guidelines need updating if they are to continue to be relevant.

Efficacy and safety of ibandronate given by intravenous injection once every 3 months

Oral bisphosphonates are established therapeutics for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Alternative, simplified dosing regimens that improve tolerability and promote convenience may be advantageous. Ibandronate is a highly potent, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that can be administered as a convenient intravenous (i.v.) injection (over 15-30 s) in schedules featuring extended between-dose intervals. In a recent fracture prevention study, 1 and 0.5 mg i.v. ibandronate injections, given once every 3 months, were shown to dose-dependently increase lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) and decrease biochemical markers of bone turnover in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, but the overall magnitude of efficacy provided by both doses was suboptimal. In the present study (Intermittent Regimen intravenous Ibandronate Study: the IRIS study), the dose-response relationship with intermittent intravenous ibandronate injections was further evaluated in 520 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (aged 55-75 years, time since menopause >or= 5 years, lumbar spine [L1-L4] BMD T score < -2.5). At enrolment, participants were randomized to receive either 2 mg (n = 261) or 1 mg (n = 131) ibandronate or placebo (n = 128) intravenous injections, given once every 3 months. After 1 year, ibandronate therapy produced substantial and dose-dependent increases in lumbar spine and hip BMD, and decreases in biochemical markers of bone turnover, with the 2 mg dose providing significantly greater efficacy than the 1 mg dose. Most notably, lumbar spine BMD increased by 5.0% and 2.8% in the 2 and 1 mg groups, respectively, and decreased by 0.04% in the placebo group. Furthermore, total hip BMD increased by 2.9%, 2.2%, and 0.6%, respectively. Serum and urinary CTX, reflecting bone resorption, were decreased by 62.5% and 61%, respectively, with the 2 mg dose, and by 43.5% and 42%, respectively, with the 1 mg dose. Intravenous ibandronate was well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse events to placebo. Importantly, no indicators of renal toxicity were reported. In summary, the 2 mg ibandronate regimen provides significantly greater BMD increases and significantly greater suppression of bone resorption markers than the 1 mg dose used in this study and in the previous fracture prevention study. Ongoing studies aim to further establish the efficacy and convenience of intermittent intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Mucosal irritative and healing impairment action of risedronate in rat stomachs: comparison with alendronate

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We used alendronate and risedronate as bisphosphonates and examined whether or not these agents have a mucosal irritative action in the stomach and impair the healing of pre-existing gastric ulcers in rats.

METHODS

Male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were used in the following two studies: (i) the effects of risedronate and alendronate on gastric potential difference (PD), gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF) and acid back-diffusion in the stomach mounted on ex vivo chamber under urethane anesthesia and; (ii) the influence of daily treatment with these drugs on the healing of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers was examined.

RESULTS

Mucosal application of risedronate produced PD reduction in the saline-perfused stomachs in a dose-dependent manner. Alendronate also produced a marked PD reduction, the effect being more potent than that of risedronate. In the stomach exposed to acid (100 mM HCl), both drugs produced a marked reduction in PD, followed by acid back-diffusion and a small increase in GMBF, resulting in hemorrhagic lesions, and the effects again were more pronounced with alendronate. These irritative effects were dependent on the pH of drug solution and the action was more potent at pH 7 than pH 4. Conversely, the healing of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers was significantly delayed by daily administration of these drugs, yet this effect was less pronounced in the case of risedronate. The healing impairing effect of these bisphosphonates was potentiated by coadministration of indomethacin.

CONCLUSION

Both alendronate and risedronate have mucosal irritative and healing impairing effects in the stomach, yet the effect of risedronate was much less pronounced compared to alendronate. It is assumed that risedronate is safer than alendronate as the antiresorptive agent in patients with diseases related to bone remodeling.

Intravenous pamidronate in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Potent oral bisphosphonates are the mainstay of therapy for osteoporosis. However, there are patients who cannot have oral bisphosphonates (e.g. because of gastrointestinal side-effects). Therefore, we wanted to examine the effects of intermittent i.v. pamidronate (APD) on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients who needed bisphosphonate therapy but could not have oral bisphosphonates.

AIM

To assess BMD before and after intermittent i.v. APD in patients requiring a bisphosphonate either for the prevention of osteoporosis on concurrent steroid therapy or for the treatment of osteoporosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective audit of 84 consecutive patients at risk of fractures commencing APD between October 1997 and May 2000. Patients were treated with intermittent i.v. APD. BMD as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before and after APD was the main outcome.

RESULTS

The mean length of treatment and mean total APD dose were 16.8 +/- 7.0 months and 186.1 +/- 79.5 mg respectively. The reasons for using APD were failure to qualify for oral bisphosphonates on the pharmaceutical benefits scheme due to lack of documented minimal trauma fractures (58%), symptomatic gastro--oesophageal disease (20%), intolerance of oral bisphosphonates (18%) and lack of efficacy of calcitriol (4%). Mean baseline T-score at lumbar (L) 2-4 spine and femoral neck were -1.54 +/- 1.22 and - 2.87 +/- 1.19, respectively. From baseline to after APD treatment, there was a significant increase in L2-4 BMD (0.883 +/- 0.175 vs 0.912 +/- 0.176 g/cm(2), P < 0.001, mean increase +3.5%), in femoral neck BMD (0.667 +/- 0.137 vs 0.680 +/- 0.134 g/cm(2), P= 0.001, mean increase +2.1%) and in trochanteric BMD (0.549 +/- 0.129 vs 0.566 +/- 0.132 g/cm(2), P < 0.001, mean increase +3.1%). One-third of the patients were on oral glucocorticoids at the time of the present study and they had a similar increase in BMD compared to patients not on gluco-corticoids. Mild side-effects occurred in seven patients, none of whom discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSION

Intermittent APD increases BMD and may be a suitable alternative for patients who cannot have oral bisphosphonates.

An approach to postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment: a case study review

PURPOSE

To review and discuss the clinical evaluation and therapeutic options for a postmenopausal woman with osteoporosis.

DATA SOURCES

Review of scientific literature, practice guidelines, and a case study.

CONCLUSIONS

To prevent and treat postmenopausal osteoporosis, women should be encouraged to perform weight-bearing exercise, to not smoke, and to optimize calcium and vitamin D intake through diet and supplements. Drug regimens are effective and well tolerated in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Drugs currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis include the bisphosphonates risedronate and alendronate; the selective estrogen receptor modulator, raloxifene; and intranasal calcitonin-salmon spray. Bisphosphonates have demonstrated the most impressive fracture risk reduction in prospective clinical trials of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Risedronate has consistently demonstrated significant reductions in vertebral fracture risk at 1 year and in vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk at 3 years. Alendronate has demonstrated significant reductions in vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk after 3 years.

Drug-induced esophageal injuries and dysphagia

OBJECTIVE

To review and analyze medical literature documenting drug-induced esophageal injury and dysphagia and to formulate strategies to enhance pharmacists' prevention, detection, and treatment of these iatrogenic complications.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1966-April 2002) was conducted to identify primary and secondary literature using variable combinations of the following search terms: pill-induced, drug-induced, or iatrogenic with esophageal injury, esophageal damage, or dysphagia. Bibliographies were also reviewed to identify additional relevant references.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All case reports, reviews, and clinical studies relating to drug-induced esophageal injury or swallowing dysfunction were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Drug-induced esophageal injury may be under-recognized. Several drugs have been associated with physical or chemically mediated injuries. Risk factors for injury have been identified and preventive and treatment strategies have been successful in limiting esophageal injury. Drug-induced dysphagia can have serious complications and is most often associated with typical neuroleptics such as haloperidol.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacists can play a pivotal role in proactively identifying situations where there is a higher likelihood of drug-induced esophageal injury or dysphagia. They can recommend preventive strategies to promote safe medication use, help identify iatrogenic complications when they occur, and assist in formulation of appropriate treatment strategies.

The Impact of Fragility Fracture on Health-Related Quality of Life

Both general and specific health status instruments can be utilised in evaluating health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) deficits resulting from osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporotic hip, vertebral and wrist fractures significantly decrease HR-QOL in most HR-QOL domains investigated. The presence of multiple vertebral fractures leads to larger decrements in HR-QOL. More research needs to be completed with these HR-QOL tools to better assess the true burden of osteoporotic fractures, particularly in the case of hip fractures, as the burden is surely being underestimated without recognition of HR-QOL. Only when the burden of fragility fractures is understood, inclusive of HR-QOL, will the value of proven antifracture prevention and treatment therapies be appreciated. Information collected by HR-QOL instruments may provide new insight as to how to improve quality of life for patients with fractures and how to properly allocate healthcare spending.

Osteoporosis management in the new millennium

The prevalence of osteoporosis in all US postmenopausal women is 17%, and it is as high as 30% in women older than 65. All postmenopausal women should be encouraged to have adequate daily calcium and vitamin D intake, to exercise regularly, and to avoid tobacco and excessive alcohol use. Although the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening tools remain to be established, a rational approach based on current evidence involves using National Osteoporosis Foundation guidelines, Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation, or Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument clinical decision rules to decide when a postmenopausal woman should undergo further evaluation.

Medication-induced oesophageal disorders

Medication-induced oesophageal distress and injury have become increasingly common conditions. First, smooth muscle relaxants may worsen or produce symptoms of pre-existing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; notable examples include certain calcium antagonists (nifedipine), nitrates, sildenafil, nicotine, theophylline, and substances with antimuscarinic potential. Second, drugs with local toxicity may produce de novo damage including inflammation, strictures, ulcers, and bleeding. Notorious examples are alendronate, certain antibiotics including tetracyclines and clindamycin, all NSAIDs/aspirin, quinidine, potassium chloride, and ferrous sulfate. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors may be devoid of such toxicity, but may damage the mucosa by interfering with regenerative cell proliferation. The galenic formulation can modulate the risk of oesophageal injury. For this reason, medicines containing the same potentially toxic ingredient may be less exchangeable than commonly thought. Diagnostic gold standard is endoscopy. The best treatment is removal of the offending drug and supportive care. Prevention requires a re-appraisal of the drug's indication and adherence to guidelines of optimal drug intake including ingestion in an upright position and swallowing with enough fluid. The clinical relevance of drug-induced oesophageal injury and the feasibility of therapeutic alternatives are individually addressed.

Bisphosphonate treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates represent the agents of choice for most patients with osteoporosis. They are the best studied of all agents for the prevention of bone loss and reduction in fractures. They increase BMD, primarily at the lumbar spine, but also at the proximal femur. In patients who have established osteoporosis, bisphosphonates reduce the risk of vertebral fractures, and are the only agents in prospective trials to reduce the risk of hip fractures and other nonvertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates reduce the risk of fracture quickly. The risk of radiographic vertebral deformities is reduced after 1 year of treatment with risedronate [68]. The risk of clinical vertebral fractures is reduced after 1 year of treatment with alendronate [69] and just 6 months' treatment with risedronate [157]. The antifracture effect of risedronate has been shown to continue through 5 years of treatment [158]. Alendronate and risedronate are approved by the FDA for prevention of bone loss in recently menopausal women, for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, and for prevention (risedronate) and treatment (alendronate and risedronate) of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Alendronate is also approved for treatment of osteoporosis in men. Other bisphosphonates (etidronate for oral use, pamidronate and zoledronate for intravenous infusion) are also available and can be used off label for patients who cannot tolerate approved agents. Although bisphosphonates combined with estrogen or raloxifene produce greater gains in bone mass compared with single-agent treatment, the use of two antiresorptive agents in combination cannot be recommended because the benefit on fracture risk has not been demonstrated and because of increased cost and side effects.

Preventing osteoporotic fractures with bisphosphonates: a review of the efficacy and tolerability

Although change in bone mineral density was the outcome most commonly measured in early clinical trials of osteoporosis therapies, it is now understood that the most clinically important outcome is reduction in the risk of fractures. Of currently available osteoporosis therapies, the bisphosphonates have been most thoroughly investigated in studies with fracture risk as the primary outcome. The most widely studied bisphosphonates include etidronate, alendronate and risedronate. Alendronate and risedronate have the most compelling evidence for vertebral and non-vertebral fracture reduction. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the anti-fracture efficacy of bisphosphonates at the spine, hip, and non-vertebral sites.

Bisphosphonate mechanism of action

The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs), alendronate and risedronate, are the only pharmacologic agents shown to prevent spine and nonvertebral fractures associated with postmenopausal and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. At the tissue level, this is achieved through osteoclast inhibition, which leads to reduced bone turnover, increased bone mass, and improved mineralization. The molecular targets of bisphosphonates (BPs) have recently been identified. This review will discuss the mechanism of action of BPs, focusing on alendronate and risedronate, which are the two agents most widely studied. They act on the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway enzyme, farnesyl diphosphate synthase. By inhibiting this enzyme in the osteoclast, they interfere with geranylgeranylation (attachment of the lipid to regulatory proteins), which causes osteoclast inactivation. This mechanism is responsible for N-BP suppression of osteoclastic bone resorption and reduction of bone turnover, which leads to fracture prevention.

Bone density changes with once weekly risedronate in postmenopausal women

Risedronate 5 mg daily is approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are common with daily bisphosphonates, but recent studies show that once weekly treatment may be better tolerated. Risedronate 30 mg is approved to treat Paget s disease of bone. In this retrospective study, we assessed the GI tolerability of 30 mg of risedronate once weekly and evaluated the effect on bone mineral density (BMD) in a subset of women. Review of patients treated in our osteoporosis clinic identified 150 postmenopausal women with low BMD treated with 30 mg of risedronate once weekly, between February 1998 and March 2001. Baseline GI symptoms or previous intolerance of bisphosphonates was present in 32 patients. An additional antiresorptive treatment was continued with risedronate in 50% of these patients (estrogen, raloxifene, or calcitonin). Risedronate 30 mg was taken once weekly with vitamin D 400 iu daily and 1200 mg of calcium daily. Patient age ranged from 46 to 86 yr. Baseline and followup BMD data were available in 36 patients. Of the 32 patients with baseline GI symptoms or previous intolerance of a bisphosphonate, 1 developed GI symptoms. In those patients with baseline and follow-up BMD results (n = 36), BMD increased 1.9% (p = 0.02) at the trochanter and 2.1% (p = 0.001) at the total hip. In conclusion 30 mg of risedronate once weekly increased BMD at the trochanter and total hip (p < 0.05). This dosage was well tolerated with a low incidence of GI side effects.

Current medical, rehabilitation, and surgical management of vertebral compression fractures

Approximately 25% of women over the age of 50 in the United States will suffer one or more vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) related to osteoporosis. VCFs are the most common of all osteoporotic fractures, with an incidence of approximately 700,000 annually. Such a fracture may cause significant pain, disability, and loss of general health and mobility and may lead to a progressive decline in quality of life. This is a review of the clinical literature on VCFs, including patient presentation, methods of diagnosis, and current rehabilitation and medical management. Much of the pain and disability that follow a VCF may be minimized by addressing the psychological impact of such a fracture, using current medications to help limit bone loss and preserve bone mass, adhering to a well-planned rehabilitation program, and consideration of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty in appropriate patients. A multifaceted approach will help to optimize recovery from a VCF related to osteoporosis.