Combination therapy of prednisone and ACE inhibitor versus ACE-inhibitor therapy alone in patients with IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial

Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Immunosuppressive agents have been widely used in the treatment of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), but the efficacy and safety remain controversial. The recent STOP-IgAN and TESTING studies have again focused attention on the application of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN. This study investigated the benefits and risks of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immunosuppressive agents with any other non-immunosuppressive agents for treating IgAN. A meta-analysis was performed on the outcomes of proteinuria, creatinine (Cr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and adverse events in patients with IgAN, and trial sequential analyses were also performed for outcomes.

Results

Twenty-nine RCTs (1957 patients) that met our inclusion criteria were identified. Steroids (weighted mean difference [WMD] –0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] –1.2 to − 0.20), non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents (NSI) (WMD –0. 43, 95% CI − 0.55 to − 0.31), and combined steroidal and non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents (S&NSI) (WMD –1.46, 95% CI − 2.13 to − 0.79) therapy significantly reduced proteinuria levels compared with the the control group. Steroid treatment significantly reduced the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (relative risk [RR] 0.39, CI 0.19 to 0.79) compared with the control group. The immunosuppressive therapy group showed significant increases in gastrointestinal, hematological, dermatological, and genitourinary side effects, as well as impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes. Hyperkalemia was more common in the control group.

Conclusion

Immunosuppressive therapy can significantly reduce proteinuria and ESRD risk in patients with IgAN, but with a concomitant increase in adverse reactions. Therefore, care is required in the application of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN.

Clinical and histological features and therapeutic strategies for IgA nephropathy

Chronic glomerulonephritis is the second most common reason, after diabetic nephropathy, for initiation of dialysis in Japan and IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most prevalent form of chronic glomerulonephritis. In the half century since IgAN was initially reported, our understanding of the long-term prognosis, clinical and histological features, pathogenesis of onset and progression, risk factors for progression, and appropriate treatment under different clinical and histological conditions, has steadily increased. Strong experimental and clinical evidence, the Clinical Practice Guidelines for IgA Nephropathy in Japan, the Oxford Classification, and the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines have all contributed to the appropriate treatment of IgAN. Several intensive therapies, such as tonsillectomy, steroid therapy, and their combinations, can result in clinical remission, and prevent the progression to end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, some IgAN patients still progress to ESRD even when treated with intensive therapies. In this review, we discuss the clinical and histological features of IgAN, focusing primarily on our previous reports, and our opinions on therapeutic strategies for IgAN.

Inker L, Floege J, Perkovic V, Boyer-Suavet S, W. Major R, I. Schimpf J, Barratt J, Cattran DC, S. Gillespie B, Kausz A, W. Mercer A, Reich HN, H. Rovin B, West M, Nachman PH. Proteinuria Reduction as a Surrogate End Point in Trials of IgA Nephropathy

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is an important cause of ESKD for which there are no approved therapies. A challenge for evaluating treatments for IgAN is the usual long time course for progression to ESKD. The aim of this Kidney Health Initiative project was to identify surrogate end points that could serve as reliable predictors of a treatment's effect on long-term kidney outcomes in IgAN and be used as a basis for approval. Proteinuria was identified as the most widely recognized and well studied risk factor for progression to ESKD in IgAN. The workgroup performed a critical review of the data on proteinuria reduction as a surrogate end point for a treatment's effect on progression to ESKD in IgAN. Epidemiologic data indicate a strong and consistent relationship between the level and duration of proteinuria and loss of kidney function. Trial-level analyses of data from 13 controlled trials also show an association between treatment effects on percent reduction of proteinuria and treatment effects on a composite of time to doubling of serum creatinine, ESKD, or death. We conclude that data support the use of proteinuria reduction as a reasonably likely surrogate end point for a treatment's effect on progression to ESKD in IgAN. In the United States, reasonably likely surrogate end points can be used as a basis for accelerated approval of therapies intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions, such as IgAN. The clinical benefit of products approved under this program would need to be verified in a postmarketing confirmatory trial.

Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids for patients with IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids for the treatment of patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) remains controversial. The aim of the study is to perform a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids for patients with IgAN.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library and article reference lists of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trial Registries for randomized controlled trials comparing glucocorticoids with other non-immunosuppressive agents in patients with IgAN.

RESULTS

The present meta-analysis, including 10 RCTs and 791 patients from 12 published studies, showed that using glucocorticoids agents relatively preserves kidney function(RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.14-0.61) and plays an effective role on reducing the proteinuria(SMD, - 0.69; 95% CI 0.85 to - 0.53, p < 0.00001; heterogeneity I2 = 0%; p = 0.09) compared with a control group. Moreover, adverse events cannot be neglected, especially gastrointestinal tract (RR 3.10, 95% CI 1.37-6.98, p = 0.006; heterogeneity I2 = 0%, p = 0.86), and corticosteroid regimens in IgAN should be reviewed with regard to safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Glucocorticoids were wildly used to treat various diseases including IgAN. Meanwhile, adverse events cannot be neglected, such as gastrointestinal adverse events, infection and so on. Corticosteroid should be used with reserve, especially in those patients with hypertension and impaired renal function or older patients.

New strategies and perspectives on managing IgA nephropathy

IgA nephropathy is an inflammatory renal disease characterised by the deposition of IgA in the glomerular mesangium and is the most commonly reported primary glomerulonephritis worldwide. Thirty to forty percent of patients with the disease develop progressive renal function decline, requiring renal replacement therapy within two decades of diagnosis. Despite this, accurate individual risk stratification at diagnosis and predicting treatment response remains a challenge. Furthermore, there are currently no disease specific treatments currently licensed to treat the condition due to long standing challenges in the nature and prevalence of the disease. Despite this, there have been exciting recent advances in the field that may represent paradigm shifts in the way IgA nephropathy is managed in the near future. In this review, we explore the evidence base informing current approaches to management and explore new strategies and future directions in the diagnosis and management of IgA nephropathy.

Treatment of IgA nephropathy: Recent advances and prospects

IgA nephropathy, identified 50 years ago in France, is the most frequent glomerular disease worldwide. The course is variable, but in most of the cases there is a relentless decline in renal function, reaching end-stage renal failure in 10-60% of the cases after 10 years and in 40% after 20 years. These data justify the interest for finding a suitable therapeutic approach particularly in progressive cases. A supportive care, including renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is the priority in cases with slowly declining renal function, particularly when developing proteinuria. The recent supportive versus immunosuppressive therapy for the treatment of progressive IgA nephropathy (STOP-IgAN) randomized and controlled trial has further stressed the benefit of a strict supportive care including also life-style changes, protein and salt restriction. However, there is clear evidence from observational studies (including the European Validation Study of the Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy [VALIGA]) and a new randomized and controlled trial (Therapeutic Evaluation of Steroids in IgA Nephropathy Global [TESTING]) of additional benefits of corticosteroid treatment in patients with proteinuric IgA nephropathy. However, the present treatment schedules carry severe side effects, mostly infectious complications, which indicate the need for less toxic interventions. The recent focus on the role of gut-kidney axis in IgA nephropathy has led to the search of corticosteroid formulations targeting the intestinal mucosal immune system (gut-associated lymphoid tissue). The NEFIGAN trial obtained interesting results in terms of reduction of proteinuria and stabilization of renal function using a budesonide formulation allowing a selective drug delivery at intestinal gut-associated lymphoid tissue sites. The adverse events, particularly infections, were found to be not clinically relevant. The possibility of a personalized approach to the treatment according to the renal biopsy lesions (Oxford MEST score) is supported by several uncontrolled studies and deserves great attention in the next future. New treatments options for IgA nephropathy include drugs targeting BAFF, a B-cell factor crucial for IgA synthesis or targeting the complement system, and also the possibility of acting directly on the deposited IgA by selective protease digestion.

A comparison of the effectiveness of cyclophosphamide, leflunomide, corticosteroids, or conservative management alone in patients with IgA nephropathy: a retrospective observational study

To compare the long-term efficacy of corticosteroids (P) alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide (CTX), leflunomide (LEF), or Angiotensin-convertase inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) in treatment for IgA nephropathy (IgAN), 311 patients with IgAN were identified. Therapeutic effectiveness (including progression, partial remission, complete remission) and combined renal endpoint (defined as 30% reduction in eGFR or ESRD) were compared based on different therapies. After immunosuppressive and ACEI/ARB treatment, the levels of eGFR, proteinuria and albumin were significantly improved at the last follow-up, the extent of improvement of eGFR, proteinuria, and albumin was more notable in P + CTX group and P + LEF group. 41%, 52.2%, 55.3% and 55.2% in P + CTX, P + LEF, P and ACEI/ARB group achieved complete remission, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that only proteinuria (Relative risk (RR) 0.82(0.72-0.94), P = 0.004) and tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (RR 0.26(0.13-0.57), P = 0.001) were predictors for complete remission. The optimal cutoffs of eGFR was 47.085 ml/min/1.73 m2 predicting renal function recovery in P + CTX therapy. In conclusion, tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis and massive proteinuria were poor predictors for complete remission in IgAN, it appears as though patients may have benefited from immunosuppressive treatment but that comparison to a well-matched contemporary control group or, ideally, a randomized controlled clinical trial, would be required to show this.

Corticosteroids pulse therapy and oral corticosteroids therapy for IgA nephropathy patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: results of a multicenter, large-scale, long-term observational cohort study

Background

Corticosteroids are widely used to reduce the urine protein levels of patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). However, their potential preventive effects on end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are unclear.

Methods

We previously performed a large-scale, long-term multicenter cohort study of patients with biopsy-proven IgAN treated between 1981 and 2013 (n = 1923). Based on the results, we reported that corticosteroids pulse therapy was potentially effective for the treatment of patients with an eGFR ≥30 ml/min/1.73m² and a urine protein amount of ≥1 g/gCr. In the present study, we extracted 766 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), stage G3–G4 (15 ≤ estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73m²) from the same cohort. We divided these patients into a steroid pulse (SP) group, oral steroid (OS) group, and no steroid (NS) group, and analyzed the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) stratified by eGFR and urine protein (UP) amounts.

Results

Over the median long-term follow-up of 70 ± 115 months, 37.1% of the patients with UP ≥1.0 g/day and 11.2% of the patients with UP < 1.0 g/day reached ESKD. Among the patients with UP ≥1 g/gCr, the SP group showed significantly better renal outcome (p < 0.001) than the OS and NS groups. In patients with UP < 1 g/gCr, there were no differences in renal survival among the treatment groups. These trends appeared even in the CKD stage G4 patients, and were also apparent in patients taking renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. The unprecedented long-term observation period in this study may have been necessary to reveal the favorable effect of corticosteroids on ESKD progression.

Conclusions

In our long-term multicenter study, Corticosteroids pulse therapy was associated with better renal outcomes in IgAN patients with higher UP values, even if their eGFR values were low.

The Emerging Role of Pathogenesis of IgA Nephropathy

IgA nephropathy is an autoimmune disease induced by fthe ormation of galactose-deficient IgA1 and anti-glycans autoantibody. A multi-hit hypothesis was promoted to explain full expression of IgA nephropathy. The deposition of immune complex resulted in activation of the complement, increasing oxidative stress, promoting inflammatory cascade, and inducing cell apoptosis via mesangio-podocytic-tubular crosstalk. The interlinked signaling pathways of immune-complex-mediated inflammation can offer a novel target for therapeutic approaches. Treatments of IgA nephropathy are also summarized in our review article. In this article, we provide an overview of the recent basic and clinical studies in cell molecular regulation of IgAN for further treatment interventions.

Complications of Immunosuppression in Glomerular Disease

Most glomerular diseases are immunologically mediated disorders of the kidney and are common causes of ESKD. In addition to supportive therapy, a wide range of immunosuppressive agents are used in the management of patients with these conditions. Immunosuppression requires a careful balance of risk and benefits, and many of these agents have a narrow therapeutic window and require close monitoring. This review describes the side effects of immunosuppressive agents used in recent randomized, controlled trials of glomerular disease, and highlights some of the key adverse events that determine the choice and prescription of these medications.

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Children and Adults With IgA Nephropathy or IgA Vasculitis: Findings From the CureGN Study

Introduction

The Cure Glomerulonephropathy Network (CureGN) is a 66-center longitudinal observational study of patients with biopsy-confirmed minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous nephropathy, or IgA nephropathy (IgAN), including IgA vasculitis (IgAV). This study describes the clinical characteristics and treatment patterns in the IgA cohort, including comparisons between IgAN versus IgAV and adult versus pediatric patients.

Methods

Patients with a diagnostic kidney biopsy within 5 years of screening were eligible to join CureGN. This is a descriptive analysis of clinical and treatment data collected at the time of enrollment.

Results

A total of 667 patients (506 IgAN, 161 IgAV) constitute the IgAN/IgAV cohort (382 adults, 285 children). At biopsy, those with IgAV were younger (13.0 years vs. 29.6 years, P < 0.001), more frequently white (89.7% vs. 78.9%, P = 0.003), had a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (103.5 vs. 70.6 ml/min per 1.73 m², P < 0.001), and lower serum albumin (3.4 vs. 3.8 g/dl, P < 0.001) than those with IgAN. Adult and pediatric individuals with IgAV were more likely than those with IgAN to have been treated with immunosuppressive therapy at or prior to enrollment (79.5% vs. 54.0%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

This report highlights clinical differences between IgAV and IgAN and between children and adults with these diagnoses. We identified differences in treatment with immunosuppressive therapies by disease type. This description of baseline characteristics will serve as a foundation for future CureGN studies.

Corticosteroid for IgA Nephropathy: Are They Really Therapeutic?

BACKGROUND

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a common chronic glomerular disease that, in most patients, slowly progresses to end-stage kidney disease. The therapy with corticosteroid in IgAN is still a worldwide problem that is confusing the clinicians.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared corticosteroids with placebo and any other non-immunosuppressive agents in treating IgAN. Twelve RCTs involving 1,057 patients were included.

RESULTS

Overall, we found that steroids had statistically significant effects in preventing the decline in renal function (relative risk 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.71, p < 0.001) and reducing proteinuria (SMD: -0.58 g/day, 95% CI -0.80 to -0.36 g/day) in patients with IgAN. The association between glucocorticoid and risk of kidney outcome was not modified by steroids' type (prednisone or methylprednisone), dose (≤30 or > 30 mg/day), duration (≤8 or > 8 months), or serum creatinine (< 1.10 or ≥1.10 mg/dL). But steroids increased the risk of side effects such as gastrointestinal and endocrinium symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the clear beneficial effects of the steroids therapy on the kidney function and proteinuria, although it should be used with caution.

Immunosuppression in IgA Nephropathy: Guideline Medicine Versus Personalized Medicine

The role of immunosuppression in IgAN remains controversial despite a growing evidence base of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In IgAN with nephrotic syndrome the role for corticosteroids is limited to cases with minimal change on light microscopy. In crescentic IgAN, the use of immunosuppression is supported only by anecdotal data, and outcome may be poor especially when glomerular filtration rate is impaired severely at presentation or there are pathologic features of chronic injury. In slowly progressive IgAN, prediction of outcome now is based both on clinical and pathologic features. Most RCTs have studied patients with urine protein levels greater than 1 g/24 h and only a minority have enrolled patients with a glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min. The Supportive versus immunosuppressive Therapy of Progressive IgA nephropathy (STOP) IgAN study emphasized the efficacy of supportive therapy (including blood pressure control and renin-angiotensin system blockade) in decreasing proteinuria to less than the usually accepted threshold for the use of corticosteroids. Earlier RCTs of corticosteroids usually did not deploy supportive therapy optimally. The recent Therapeutic Evaluation of STeroids in IgA Nephropathy Global (TESTING) study closed prematurely because of excess toxicity, but the high dose of corticosteroids seemed to provide benefit. Guidelines provide valuable information about the quality and limitations of available evidence that needs to be personalized in application to the individual patient's medical and nonmedical circumstances to ensure wise clinical decision making.

Tacrolimus decreases proteinuria in patients with refractory IgA nephropathy

In clinical practice, some IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients show resistance to or are unable to achieve complete remission using steroids and/or immunosuppressants. The current study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in the treatment of cases of refractory IgAN.In this retrospective observational study, 34 primary IgAN patients with refractory proteinuria received tacrolimus for at least 12 months. Complete remission, partial remission, and other clinical data were measured at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the initiation of treatment.After 12 months, complete remission was achieved in 20 (58.8%) patients and partial remission in 5 (14.7%) patients, yielding a total response rate of 73.5%. The mean time for response to tacrolimus for those who achieved complete remission and partial remission was 7.0 ± 4.7 weeks. Serum creatinine (Scr), uric acid, estimated glomerular filtration rate, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate transaminase, white blood cell count, blood pressure, blood glucose, total cholesterol, and total triglyceride were stable over time. Three patients demonstrated a loss of eGFR >15 mL/min·1.73 m from baseline. Three cases of upper respiratory infection and 2 cases of urinary tract infection were observed during the study. Patients who achieved complete remission had better renal function and lower baseline proteinuria than partial remission and nonresponder patients. Crescent formation in biopsy specimens was seen more often in nonresponder patients.Tacrolimus was safe and effective at lowering proteinuria in refractory IgAN patients. Lower baseline proteinuria and better renal function were associated with a higher probability of complete remission, while crescent formation was associated with a worse prognosis.

Mucosal corticosteroid therapy of IgA nephropathy

The value of systemic immunosuppressive therapy for IgA nephropathy is uncertain. A recently completed randomized controlled phase II trial demonstrates that specially encapsulated budesonide, released preferentially in the terminal ileum, can reduce proteinuria and stabilize glomerular filtration rate in patients with IgA nephropathy.

Primary IgA nephropathy: current challenges and future prospects

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common form of primary glomerulonephritis worldwide, exhibiting a variable clinical and pathological course and significantly contributing to the global burden of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Current standards of care focus on optimization of antihypertensive and antiproteinuric therapies (typically renin- angiotensin system blockade) to reduce disease progression. Much recent attention has focused on whether additional immunosuppression confers better outcomes than supportive management alone, and indeed, several trials have demonstrated renoprotective effects following the use of oral corticosteroids. However, results have been inconsistent, and perceived benefits must be balanced against risks and adverse effects associated with generalized immunosuppression, as highlighted by the high-profile STOP-IgAN and TESTING clinical trials. Recent translational research in vitro and animal models of IgAN have generated greater insight into potential therapeutic targets for this complex autoimmune disease. Deeper understanding of the roles of the mucosal immune barrier, complement activation and deposition, T-cell dependent and independent mechanisms of B cell activation, and of the deposition and downstream inflammatory signaling pathways of nephritogenic polymeric IgA1 complexes (e.g., signaling of immune receptors via spleen tyrosine kinase) has formed the rationale for the development of novel agents and clinical trials of more targeted therapies. However, translating findings into clinical practice is challenging, with many immunopathological features of IgAN specific to humans. Recent comprehensive reviews outline current understanding of mechanisms of IgAN as well as ongoing and future clinical trials; it is not our aim to replicate this here. Instead, we take a mechanistic approach to current treatment strategies, outlining advantages and limitations of each before exploring ongoing research with potential translation into future targeted therapies for this complex disease.

IGA nephropathy - Are intravenous steroid pulses more effective than oral steroids in relapse prevention?

INTRODUCTION

It is recommended that IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is treated with steroids when the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is >50ml/min and proteinuria >1g/day. Few studies have been performed comparing the two accepted steroid regimens (1g/day methylprednisolone pulses for 3 consecutive days at the beginning of months 1, 3 and 5, followed by 0.5mg/kg prednisolone on alternate days vs. 1mg/kg/day oral prednisolone). The aim of this study was to compare these two steroid regimens in IgAN treatment.

METHODS

We selected 39 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN treated with steroids. Mean age at diagnosis was 37.5 years, 23 males (59%), baseline proteinuria (Uprot) was 2.1 g/day and median serum creatinine (SCr) was 1.5mg/dl. The mean follow-up period was 56 months. Twenty-five patients (64%) were treated with methylprednisolone pulses and 14 (36%) with oral steroids.

RESULTS

Patients treated with steroid pulses presented lower relapse risk, defined as the reappearance of Uprot >1g/day and an Uprot increase of more than 50% (incidence rate ratio of 0.18, 95% CI 0.02-0.5). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed longer relapse-free period (p=0.019). This result was confirmed in a multivariate analysis (p=0.026). However, we did not find other differences between the two steroid regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to oral steroids, the intravenous pulse regimen was associated with a lower risk of relapse in IgAN, a known independent negative predictor of renal survival. No differences were found regarding the other renal outcomes.

Effects of Two Immunosuppressive Treatment Protocols for IgA Nephropathy

The role of immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is controversial. In the Supportive Versus Immunosuppressive Therapy for the Treatment of Progressive IgA Nephropathy (STOP-IgAN) Trial, 162 patients with IgAN and proteinuria >0.75 g/d after 6 months of optimized supportive care were randomized into two groups: continued supportive care or additional immunosuppression (GFR≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m²: 6-month corticosteroid monotherapy; GFR=30-59 ml/min per 1.73 m²: cyclophosphamide for 3 months followed by azathioprine plus oral prednisolone). Coprimary end points were full clinical remission and GFR loss ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m² during the 3-year trial phase. In this secondary intention to treat analysis, we separately analyzed data from each immunosuppression subgroup and the corresponding patients on supportive care. Full clinical remission occurred in 11 (20%) patients receiving corticosteroid monotherapy and three (6%) patients on supportive care (odds ratio, 5.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 26.36; P=0.02), but the rate did not differ between patients receiving immunosuppressive combination and controls on supportive care (11% versus 4%, respectively; P=0.30). The end point of GFR loss ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m² did not differ between groups. Only corticosteroid monotherapy transiently reduced proteinuria at 12 months. Severe infections, impaired glucose tolerance, and/or weight gain in the first year were more frequent with either immunosuppressive regimen than with supportive care. In conclusion, only corticosteroid monotherapy induced disease remission in a minority of patients who had IgAN with relatively well preserved GFR and persistent proteinuria. Neither immunosuppressive regimen prevented GFR loss, and both associated with substantial adverse events.

Is there a role for immunosuppression in immunoglobulin A nephropathy?

The most common primary glomerular disease globally is IgA nephropathy (IgAN). It is often a slowly progressive disease, and ∼40% of patients will progress to kidney failure. Due to a lack of large clinical trial networks and a lack of surrogate markers of treatment efficacy, there are relatively few large multicenter clinical trials in IgAN. Given that both the pathogenesis and progression of IgAN are linked to defects in mucosal immune regulation and inflammation, use of immunosuppression to prevent kidney failure is well founded. However, recent clinical trials have supported improvement in disease parameters, but this has not always translated to parallel amelioration in longer-term outcome. In this review we summarize the most current clinical research examining the efficacy of immunosuppression in IgAN.

Effect of Oral Methylprednisolone on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With IgA Nephropathy: The TESTING Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Guidelines recommend corticosteroids in patients with IgA nephropathy and persistent proteinuria, but the effects remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in patients with IgA nephropathy at risk of progression.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Therapeutic Evaluation of Steroids in IgA Nephropathy Global (TESTING) study was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial designed to recruit 750 participants with IgA nephropathy (proteinuria greater than 1 g/d and estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of 20 to 120 mL/min/1.73 m2 after at least 3 months of blood pressure control with renin-angiotensin system blockade] and to provide follow-up until 335 primary outcomes occurred.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to oral methylprednisolone (0.6-0.8 mg/kg/d; maximum, 48 mg/d) (n = 136) or matching placebo (n = 126) for 2 months, with subsequent weaning over 4 to 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary composite outcome was end-stage kidney disease, death due to kidney failure, or a 40% decrease in eGFR. Predefined safety outcomes were serious infection, new diabetes, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, fracture/osteonecrosis, and cardiovascular events. The mean required follow-up was estimated to be 5 years.

RESULTS

After randomization of 262 participants (mean age, 38.6 [SD, 11.1] years; 96 [37%] women; eGFR, 59.4 mL/min/1.73 m2; urine protein excretion, 2.40 g/d) and 2.1 years' median follow-up, recruitment was discontinued because of excess serious adverse events. Serious events occurred in 20 participants (14.7%) in the methylprednisolone group vs 4 (3.2%) in the placebo group (P = .001; risk difference, 11.5% [95% CI, 4.8%-18.2%]), mostly due to excess serious infections (11 [8.1%] vs 0; risk difference, 8.1% [95% CI, 3.5%-13.9%]; P < .001), including 2 deaths. The primary renal outcome occurred in 8 participants (5.9%) in the methylprednisolone group vs 20 (15.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.17-0.85]; risk difference, 10.0% [95% CI, 2.5%-17.9%]; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with IgA nephropathy and proteinuria of 1 g/d or greater, oral methylprednisolone was associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events, primarily infections. Although the results were consistent with potential renal benefit, definitive conclusions about treatment benefit cannot be made, owing to early termination of the trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01560052.

IgA nephropathy in Greece: data from the registry of the Hellenic Society of Nephrology

Background

Natural history, predisposing factors to an unfavourable outcome and the effect of various therapeutic regimens were evaluated in a cohort of 457 patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) and follow-up of at least 12 months.

Methods

Patients with normal renal function and proteinuria <1 g/24 h as well as those with serum creatinine (SCr) >2.5 mg/dL and/or severe glomerulosclerosis received no treatment. Patients with normal or impaired renal function and proteinuria >1 g/24 h for >6 months received daily oral prednisolone or a 3-day course of intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisolone per os every other day or a combination of prednisolone and azathioprine. The clinical outcome was estimated using the primary endpoints of end-stage renal disease and/or doubling of baseline SCr.

Results

The overall 10-year renal survival was 90.8%, while end-stage renal disease and doubling of baseline SCr developed in 9.2% and 14.7% of patients, respectively. Risk factors related to the primary endpoints were elevated baseline SCr, arterial hypertension, persistent proteinuria >0.5 g/24 h and severity of tubulointerstial fibrosis. There was no difference in the clinical outcome of patients treated by the two regimens of corticosteroids; nevertheless, remission of proteinuria was more frequent in patients who received IV methylprednisolone (P = 0.000). The combination of prednisolone with azathioprine was not superior to IV methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisolone. Side effects related to immunossuppressive drugs were observed in 12.8% of patients.

Conclusion

The clinical outcome of patients with IgAN was related to the severity of clinical and histological involvement. The addition of azathioprine to a corticosteroid-based regimen for IgAN does not improve renal outcome.

Targeted-release budesonide versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy (NEFIGAN): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial

BACKGROUND

IgA nephropathy is thought to be associated with mucosal immune system dysfunction, which manifests as renal IgA deposition that leads to impairment and end-stage renal disease in 20-40% of patients within 10-20 years. In this trial (NEFIGAN) we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of a novel targeted-release formulation of budesonide (TRF-budesonide), designed to deliver the drug to the distal ileum in patients with IgA nephropathy.

METHODS

We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial, comprised of 6-month run-in, 9-month treatment, and 3-month follow-up phases at 62 nephrology clinics across ten European countries. We recruited patients aged at least 18 years with biopsy-confirmed primary IgA nephropathy and persistent proteinuria despite optimised renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade. We randomly allocated patients with a computer algorithm, with a fixed block size of three, in a 1:1:1 ratio to 16 mg/day TRF-budesonide, 8 mg/day TRF-budesonide, or placebo, stratified by baseline urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR). Patients self-administered masked capsules, once daily, 1 h before breakfast during the treatment phase. All patients continued optimised RAS blockade treatment throughout the trial. Our primary outcome was mean change from baseline in UPCR for the 9-month treatment phase, which was assessed in the full analysis set, defined as all randomised patients who took at least one dose of trial medication and had at least one post-dose efficacy measurement. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the intervention. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01738035.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 11, 2012, and June 25, 2015, 150 randomised patients were treated (safety set) and 149 patients were eligible for the full analysis set. Overall, at 9 months TRF-budesonide (16 mg/day plus 8 mg/day) was associated with a 24·4% (SEM 7·7%) decrease from baseline in mean UPCR (change in UPCR vs placebo 0·74; 95% CI 0·59-0·94; p=0·0066). At 9 months, mean UPCR had decreased by 27·3% in 48 patients who received 16 mg/day (0·71; 0·53-0·94; p=0·0092) and 21·5% in the 51 patients who received 8 mg/day (0·76; 0·58-1·01; p=0·0290); 50 patients who received placebo had an increase in mean UPCR of 2·7%. The effect was sustained throughout followup. Incidence of adverse events was similar in all groups (43 [88%] of 49 in the TRF-budesonide 16 mg/day group, 48 [94%] of 51 in the TRF-budesonide 8 mg/day, and 42 [84%] of 50 controls). Two of 13 serious adverse events were possibly associated with TRF-budesonide-deep vein thrombosis (16 mg/day) and unexplained deterioration in renal function in follow-up (patients were tapered from 16 mg/day to 8 mg/day over 2 weeks and follow-up was assessed 4 weeks later).

INTERPRETATION

TRF-budesonide 16 mg/day, added to optimised RAS blockade, reduced proteinuria in patients with IgA nephropathy. This effect is indicative of a reduced risk of future progression to end-stage renal disease. TRF-budesonide could become the first specific treatment for IgA nephropathy targeting intestinal mucosal immunity upstream of disease manifestation.

FUNDING

Pharmalink AB.

Clinical usefulness of the Oxford classification in determining immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The Oxford classification has been widely used in IgA nephropathy. However, its clinical usefulness of determining immunosuppression is unknown.

AIM

Whether the Oxford classification could predict the development of proteinuria ≥1 g/g Cr and worsening kidney function, as well as the clinical efficacy of corticosteroid treatment according to each histologic variable of the Oxford-MEST.

METHODS

We included 377 patients with early-stage IgA nephropathy. The study endpoints were the development of a heavy proteinuria and a decline renal function.

RESULTS

The results showed that among the Oxford-MEST lesions, only M1 predicted the risk of the development of proteinuria ≥1.0 g/g Cr compared to other lesions in a time-varying Cox model adjusted for multiple confounding factors. In addition, the risk of reaching a 30% decline in eGFR was significantly higher in patients with M1 than in those with M0. Furthermore, patients with M1 had a greater decline of eGFR than patients with M0. However, steroid treatment in M1 lesion was not associated with improving clinical outcomes in the unmatched and propensity score matched cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding may provide a rationale for using the Oxford classification as a guidance to initiate immunosuppression in the early stages of IgA nephropathy. KEY MESSAGES M1 has independently predictive role among the Oxford lesions in IgA nephropathy. Oxford classification should be defined during pathologic approach. Decision of starting immunosuppression according to the Oxford lesions.

IgA Nephropathy

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a leading cause of CKD and renal failure. Recent international collaborative efforts have led to important discoveries that have improved our understanding of some of the key steps involved in the immunopathogenesis of IgAN. Furthermore, establishment of multicenter networks has contributed to rigorous design and execution of clinical trials that have provided important insights regarding immunotherapy in IgAN. In this article, we review emerging developments in clinical and translational IgAN research and describe how these novel findings will influence future strategies to improve the outcome of patients with IgAN.

Severe Adverse Effects Associated With Corticosteroid Treatment in Patients With IgA Nephropathy

Introduction

Few data are available on the risk of SAEs in corticosteroid users in IgAN populations. We describe the prevalence and risk factors of corticosteroid-related SAEs in a Chinese cohort.

Methods

A total of 1034 IgAN patients were followed up in our renal center from 2003 to 2014. Prevalence of corticosteroid use and corticosteroid-related SAEs were noted. Logistic regression was used to search for risk factors of SAEs in corticosteroid users.

Results

Of the 369 patients with steroids therapy, 46 patients (12.5%) with 58 events suffered SAEs, whereas only 18 patients (2.7%) without corticosteroids suffered SAEs (OR: 5.45; 95% CI: 3.07–9.68; P < 0.001). SAEs included diabetes mellitus (n = 19, 5.1%), severe or fatal infection (n = 18, 4.9%), osteonecrosis of the femoral head or bone fracture (n = 6, 1.6%), cardiocerebral vascular disease (n = 4, 1.1%), cataract (n = 3, 0.8%), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n = 1, 0.3%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02–1.07; P < 0.001) and hypertension (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01–1.06; P = 0.009) were risk factors for corticosteroid-related SAEs. Impaired kidney function (estimated GFR: OR: O.98; 95% CI: 0.96–0.99; P = 0.036) was a risk factor for severe infection. Accumulated dosages of corticosteroids were not identified as a risk factor of SAEs (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.91–1.30; P = 0.365).

Discussion

Corticosteroid use is associated with a high risk of SAEs in IgAN patients, especially those who are older, have hypertension, or impaired renal function. Current guidelines on corticosteroid regimens in IgAN should be reviewed with regard to safety.

The clinical course of IgA nephropathy after kidney transplantation and its management

Immunoglobulin (Ig) A nephropathy is one of the most common primary glomerulonephritides worldwide causing end stage renal disease in up to 20-40% of affected patients, nearly two decades post diagnosis. Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with renal failure, secondary to glomerular diseases. However, IgA nephropathy has a strong tendency to recur in the graft, and although initially thought to be a benign condition, several reports of graft loss, due to recurrent IgA nephropathy, there have been over the last three decades. Overall graft survival has been significantly improved in kidney transplantation, as a result of reduced incidence of acute rejection, as more potent and more specific immunosuppressive agents are now available in clinical practice. Thus, the rates of IgA nephropathy and other glomerulonephritides recurrence are expected to increase, since graft survival has been improved. However, the reported incidence of IgA nephropathy recurrence in the graft varies substantially across centers, as a consequence of different levels of interest, diverse biopsy policies and differing durations of follow up, of the published studies. Notably, recurrence rates of patients receiving graft biopsies by clinical indication only, ranges from 13% to 50% with graft loss being between 1.3% and 16%. The aim of this review is to underline important pathogenetic insights of IgA nephropathy, describe the clinical course of the disease after kidney transplantation, with emphasis on the incidence of recurrence and the associated risk factors, and finally provide all available options for its management in transplant recipients.

Immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy: how certain are we?

The optimal role of immunosuppressive therapy in the treatment of IgA nephropathy is controversial. Results of a recently completed randomized controlled trial provide strong support for comprehensive supportive care rather than immunosuppressive therapy in patients at high risk for progression.

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Rituximab in IgA Nephropathy with Proteinuria and Renal Dysfunction

IgA nephropathy frequently leads to progressive CKD. Although interest surrounds use of immunosuppressive agents added to standard therapy, several recent studies have questioned efficacy of these agents. Depleting antibody-producing B cells potentially offers a new therapy. In this open label, multicenter study conducted over 1-year follow-up, we randomized 34 adult patients with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy and proteinuria >1 g/d, maintained on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers with well controlled BP and eGFR<90 ml/min per 1.73 m², to receive standard therapy or rituximab with standard therapy. Primary outcome measures included change in proteinuria and change in eGFR. Median baseline serum creatinine level (range) was 1.4 (0.8-2.4) mg/dl, and proteinuria was 2.1 (0.6-5.3) g/d. Treatment with rituximab depleted B cells and was well tolerated. eGFR did not change in either group. Rituximab did not alter the level of proteinuria compared with that at baseline or in the control group; three patients in each group had ≥50% reduction in level of proteinuria. Serum levels of galactose-deficient IgA1 or antibodies against galactose-deficient IgA1 did not change. In this trial, rituximab therapy did not significantly improve renal function or proteinuria assessed over 1 year. Although rituximab effectively depleted B cells, it failed to reduce serum levels of galactose-deficient IgA1 and antigalactose-deficient IgA1 antibodies. Lack of efficacy of rituximab, at least at this stage and severity of IgA nephropathy, may reflect a failure of rituximab to reduce levels of specific antibodies assigned salient pathogenetic roles in IgA nephropathy.

Corticosteroids in IgA Nephropathy: Lessons from Recent Studies

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a common chronic glomerular disease that, in most patients, slowly progresses to ESRD. The immune and autoimmune responses that characterize IgAN indicate a potential benefit for corticosteroids. The 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) guidelines suggest giving corticosteroids to patients with rather preserved renal function (GFR>50 ml/min per 1.73 m²) and persistent proteinuria >1 g/d, despite 3-6 months of optimized supportive care with renin-angiotensin system blockers. However, the evidence supporting this guideline was considered of low quality. More recent results from large cohort studies and randomized, controlled trials have provided conflicting messages about the benefits of corticosteroid treatment over supportive care alone, mostly involving optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade, which might generate further uncertainty in the therapeutic choice. Overall, these results indicate that corticosteroids are a powerful tool for treating patients with IgAN; however, treatment success is not universal and mostly occurs in patients who are highly proteinuric with early CKD. In patients with advanced CKD, the side effects of corticosteroids increase, and the renal protection decreases. This brief review aimed at integrating the findings of these recently published reports to provide balanced advice for clinicians as well as suggestions for future trials.

Tacrolimus combined with low-dose corticosteroids is an effective and safe therapeutic option for refractory IgA nephropathy

Tacrolimus (TAC) has been shown to improve remission from proteinuria in patients with refractory IgA nephropathy (IgAN); however, the efficacy and safety of TAC in such patients have not been fully explored. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the tolerance to and efficacy of TAC combined with low-dose corticosteroids in patients with refractory IgAN. This was a single-center retrospective study. A total of 28 patients with refractory IgAN were randomly included and received TAC plus corticosteroid; 26 patients received TAC and prednisone, and 2 patients received TAC and methylprednisolone. In addition, all patients were treated with an angiotensin inhibitor. Total urinary protein excretion, serum albumin, blood glucose, complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), serum creatinine (Scr) and estimated GFR (eGFR) were tested at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initiation of treatment in all patients. The primary endpoints were CR and PR. Secondary endpoints included changes of Scr, eGFR, clinical data and adverse events. After 12 months, CR was achieved in 40.1% of patients and PR in 43.4%, yielding a total response rate of 83.5%, and the total urinary protein excretion, serum albumin, cholesterol and LDL results were improved significantly compared with those at baseline. Proteinuria and serum albumin results were significantly improved by month 3 of treatment. Two patients relapsed during months 3-6 of follow-up. At the 12-month follow-up, renal function was improved compared with the baseline level as evidenced by eGFR and Scr, respectively. The blood glucose level was stable. One case of pneumococcal pneumonia developed in a patient treated with TAC plus low-dose methylprednisolone and one case of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage was found in a patient treated with TAC plus low-dose prednisone; both cases completely recovered after treatment. In conclusion, TAC combined with low-dose corticosteroids may be an effective and safe therapeutic option for the treatment of refractory IgAN. However, given the small number of patients in this study, further prospective randomized controlled trials are required with a larger sample of participants and longer follow-up period.

Corticosteroid Treatment Influences TA-Proteinuria and Renal Survival in IgA Nephropathy

The clinical course of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and its outcome are extremely variable. Proteinuria at baseline has been considered one of the most important risk factors. More recently, mean proteinuria of follow-up (time-average proteinuria: TAp) was described as a stronger marker of renal survival, suggesting to consider it as a marker of disease activity and response to treatment. We evaluated predictors of renal survival in IgAN patients with different degrees of renal dysfunction and histological lesions, focusing on the role of the therapy in influencing TAp. We performed a retrospective analysis of three prospective, randomized, clinical trials enrolling 325 IgAN patients from 1989 to 2005. Patients were divided into 5 categories according to TAp. The primary endpoint of the 100% increase of serum creatinine occurred in 54 patients (16.6%) and renal survival was much better in groups having lower TAp. The median follow up was 66.6 months (range 12 to 144). The primary endpoint of the 100% increase of serum creatinine occurred in 54 patients (16,6%) and renal survival was much better in groups having lower TA proteinuria. At univariate analysis plasma creatinine and 24h proteinuria, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure during follow-up and treatment with either steroid (CS) or steroid plus azathioprine (CS+A) were the main factors associated with lower TAp and renal survival. At multivariate analysis, female gender, treatment with S or S+A, lower baseline proteinuria and SBP during follow-up remained as the only variables independently influencing TAp. In conclusion, TA-proteinuria is confirmed as one of the best outcome indicators, also in patients with a severe renal insufficiency. A 6-month course of corticosteroids seems the most effective therapy to reduce TAp.

[IgA nephropathy]

IgA nephropathy is the most common form of primary glomerulonephritis worldwide and an important cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney failure. Its pathophysiology remains in part unsolved but it is recognized as an immune complex disease. Recent years have brought progress in the field through the discovery of several genetic susceptibility loci and the formulation of the multi-hit pathogenesis model. Presentation, clinical course and histology can be extremely variable, making any histological classification still difficult. Indeed, most therapeutic studies until now include patients based only on the severity of clinical criteria but the new classification of Oxford should change that. Only the management of patients with nephropathy with minimal change glomerular lesions and nephrotic syndrome, or extra-capillary glomerulonephritis and rapidly progressive renal failure, is consensual: Corticosteroids alone for the first and associated with immunosuppressive drugs for the latter. The recent Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) consensus treatment guideline is still controversial, especially in light of the last clinical studies. Corticosteroid therapy can be discussed in patients with proteinuria greater than 1 g/day without renal failure. All IgA nephropathy patients should benefit from the global management of chronic glomerular disease, including a renin-angiotensin system blocker in the presence of hypertension or proteinuria.

Primary glomerulonephritides

Most glomerulonephritides, even the more common types, are rare diseases. They are nevertheless important since they frequently affect young people, often cannot be cured, and can lead to chronic kidney disease, including end-stage renal failure, with associated morbidity and cost. For example, in young adults, IgA nephropathy is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease. In this Seminar, we summarise existing knowledge of clinical signs, pathogenesis, prognosis, and treatment of glomerulonephritides, with a particular focus on data published between 2008 and 2015, and the most common European glomerulonephritis types, namely IgA nephropathy, membranous glomerulonephritis, minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and the rare complement-associated glomerulonephritides such as dense deposit disease and C3 glomerulonephritis.

Emerging therapies in immunoglobulin A nephropathy

Despite advances in our understanding of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) over the past decade, there are currently no specific therapies capable of targeting key pathways involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. Recent studies have, however, provided new insights into important molecular pathways that are likely to be amenable to therapeutic manipulation in the future. Specifically, a deeper understanding of the role of mucosal immunity, B-cell activation and mesangial cell activation in IgAN has provided the impetus for a number of exciting phase II/III clinical trials in IgAN. In this review, we examine some of these on-going studies, first examining studies that clarify the role of traditional immunosuppression in IgAN, then focusing on novel therapies in early clinical studies, looking closely at the rationale for these agents in relation to our current understanding of the pathogenesis of IgAN. Finally, we examine emerging pathways and therapeutic agents that have the potential to be developed as novel therapies in the coming years. It is hoped that as we continue to develop a greater understanding of IgAN, emerging therapies will soon become a reality in the day-to-day treatment of patients with IgAN.

Highlights of the 2015 ERA-EDTA Congress--glomerular diseases

The present paper summarizes highlights in the field of glomerular diseases presented at the 2015 European Renal Association congress in London. Topics covered include a European survey on renal biopsy practice and indications, the STOP-IgAN randomized controlled trial in patients with IgA-nephropathy, B-cell- targeting therapies in minimal change nephropathy and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), novel insights into the action of glucocorticosteroids in glomerular crescent and scar (FSGS) formation, the immunoproteasome in IgA-nephropathy, socio-economic factors and glomerular disease progression, glomerular CD80 (B7-1) expression in FSGS patients and aldosterone-antagonism in proteinuric renal diseases.

Intensive Supportive Care plus Immunosuppression in IgA Nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of immunosuppressive therapy, when added to supportive care, in patients with IgA nephropathy are uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial with a two-group, parallel, group-sequential design. During a 6-month run-in phase, supportive care (in particular, blockade of the renin-angiotensin system) was adjusted on the basis of proteinuria. Patients who had persistent proteinuria with urinary protein excretion of at least 0.75 g per day were randomly assigned to receive supportive care alone (supportive-care group) or supportive care plus immunosuppressive therapy (immunosuppression group) for 3 years. The primary end points in hierarchical order were full clinical remission at the end of the trial (protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.2 [with both protein and creatinine measured in grams] and a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of <5 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area from baseline) and a decrease in the eGFR of at least 15 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) at the end of the trial. The primary end points were analyzed with the use of logistic-regression models.

RESULTS

The run-in phase was completed by 309 of 337 patients. The proteinuria level decreased to less than 0.75 g of urinary protein excretion per day in 94 patients. Of the remaining 162 patients who consented to undergo randomization, 80 were assigned to the supportive-care group, and 82 to the immunosuppression group. After 3 years, 4 patients (5%) in the supportive-care group, as compared with 14 (17%) in the immunosuppression group, had a full clinical remission (P=0.01). A total of 22 patients (28%) in the supportive-care group and 21 (26%) in the immunosuppression group had a decrease in the eGFR of at least 15 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) (P=0.75). There was no significant difference in the annual decline in eGFR between the two groups. More patients in the immunosuppression group than in the supportive-care group had severe infections, impaired glucose tolerance, and weight gain of more than 5 kg in the first year of treatment. One patient in the immunosuppression group died of sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of immunosuppressive therapy to intensive supportive care in patients with high-risk IgA nephropathy did not significantly improve the outcome, and during the 3-year study phase, more adverse effects were observed among the patients who received immunosuppressive therapy, with no change in the rate of decrease in the eGFR. (Funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research; STOP-IgAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00554502.).