Biceps load test II: A clinical test for SLAP lesions of the shoulder

Management of the throwing shoulder: cuff, labrum and internal impingement

Repetitive throwing or other overhead activity places great stress on the shoulder. As a result, the shoulder is a common site of injury in athletes. Addressing throwing-related injuries requires an understanding of throwing biomechanics and pathology. Nonoperative treatment is directed at restoring strength, flexibility, and neuromuscular control to the entire kinetic chain. Surgery is indicated when nonoperative treatment fails, and is directed at correcting labral, capsular, and rotator cuff pathology.

Management of type II superior labrum anterior posterior lesions: a review of the literature

Superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions were first described in 1985 by Andrews et al. and later classified into four types by Synder et al. The most prevalent is type II which is fraying of the superior glenoid labrum with detachment of the biceps anchor. Superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions can also be associated with other shoulder pathology. Both MRI and MRA can be utilized in making the diagnosis with the coronal images being the most sensitive. The mechanism of injury can be either repetitive stress or acute trauma with the superior labrum most vulnerable to injury during the late cocking phase of throwing. A combination of the modified dynamic labral shear and O'Brien test can be used clinically in making the diagnosis of SLAP lesion. However, the most sensitive and specific test used to diagnosis specifically a type II SLAP lesion is the Biceps Load Test II. The management of type II SLAP lesions is controversial and dependent on patient characteristics. In the young high demanding overhead athlete, repair of the type II lesion is recommended to prevent glenohumeral instability. In middle-aged patients (age 25-45), repair of the type II SLAP lesion with concomitant treatment of other shoulder pathology resulted in better functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, patients who had a distinct traumatic event resulting in the type II SLAP tear did better functionally than patients who did not have the traumatic event when the lesion was repaired. In the older patient population (age over 45 years), minimum intervention (debridement, biceps tenodesis/tenotomy) to the type II SLAP lesion results in excellent patient satisfaction and outcomes.

The passive distraction test: a new diagnostic aid for clinically significant superior labral pathology

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to present a new provocative maneuver, the passive distraction test (PDT), as an examination tool to be used in the evaluation of patients thought to have a SLAP lesion and to compare its accuracy, precision, and reproducibility alone and in conjunction with previously published maneuvers.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 319 consecutive arthroscopies performed between May 2001 and November 2003 was performed. A total of 65 cases were excluded, 53 because of limitation of elevation to less than 150 degrees or pain in the starting test position and 12 who had previous shoulder procedures performed by the senior author, leaving 254 cases for review. A thorough history was obtained and a thorough physical examination performed with a focus on the involved shoulder including specific provocative maneuvers for the clinical diagnosis of a SLAP lesion. The active compression test, the anterior slide test, and the PDT were used to clinically diagnose a SLAP lesion. The results from the 3 provocative maneuvers were compared with the arthroscopic findings to determine the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value of each test alone and in a logical combination.

RESULTS

Of 254 shoulder arthroscopies, 61 had a clinically significant SLAP lesion, for an incidence of 24%. The sensitivity and specificity for the PDT were 53% and 94%, respectively, with an NPV of 87% and positive predictive value of 72%. In combination, the PDT and the active compression test yielded an NPV of 90.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The PDT can be used alone or in combination to aid in the clinical evaluation and diagnosis of a SLAP lesion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective, diagnostic, sensitivity-specificity study.

Clinical and imaging assessment for superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions

In the evaluation of the painful shoulder, especially in the overhead athlete, diagnosing superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions continues to challenge the clinician because of 1) the lack of specificity of examination tests for SLAP; 2) a paucity of well-controlled studies of those tests; and 3) the presence of coexisting confounding abnormalities. Some evidence indicates that multiple positive tests increase the likelihood that a SLAP lesion is present, but no one physical examination finding conclusively makes that diagnosis. The goals of this article were to review the physical examination techniques for making the diagnosis of SLAP lesions, to evaluate the clinical usefulness of those examinations, and to review the role of magnetic resonance imaging in making the diagnosis.

Effects of zone-specific superior labral detachment on biceps anchor stability

PURPOSE

This study aimed to elucidate the degree of biceps anchor displacement that occurs when specific zones of the superior labrum are detached from the glenoid.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric scapulae with intact labrums were prepared by removing the surrounding musculature with the labrum, biceps anchor, and biceps tendon carefully preserved. Pulleys were used to apply traction in 3 different directions- superior, lateral, and combined posterior/superior/lateral, to simulate the "peel-back" mechanism-while a continuous 1.13 kg of traction was applied to the biceps tendon. Labral tears were created by sharp incisions in isolation and in combinations of 3 zones defined relative to the glenoid fossa: anterior, posterior, or superior. The displacement of the biceps anchor (position of the marker after the simulated lesion relative to the marker position with the labrum intact) was measured relative to a rigid reference frame.

RESULTS

The greatest degree of displacement occurred with the sectioning of all 3 zones, followed by the sectioning of 2 adjacent zones. Superior traction created the least displacement in all combinations, while lateral traction created maximal displacement, with one exception: in the setting of anterosuperior/superior lesions, maximal displacement was observed using the peel-back mechanism.

CONCLUSION

Biceps anchor displacement, particularly the degree and direction of displacement, is affected by the labral detachment pattern. All 3 labral zones assessed in this study have important biomechanical contributions to biceps anchor displacement.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

These findings have important implications relating to the clinician's arthroscopic assessment of superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) tears, as well as the determination of need for stabilization. This information is particularly useful when treating SLAP tears in certain laborers and athletes, whose activities may cause specific biceps anchor displacement patterns.

A meta-analysis examining clinical test utility for assessing superior labral anterior posterior lesions

BACKGROUND

The reported accuracy of clinical tests for superior labral anterior posterior lesions is extremely variable. Pooling results from multiple studies of higher quality is necessary to establish the best clinical tests to use.

HYPOTHESIS

Certain clinical tests are superior to others for diagnosing the presence or absence of a superior labral anterior posterior lesion.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE (1966-2007), CINAHL (1982-2007), and BIOSIS (1995-2007) was performed for (labrum OR labral OR SLAP OR Bankart) AND (shoulder OR shoulder joint OR glenoid) AND (specificity OR sensitivity AND specificity). Identified articles were reviewed for inclusion criteria. Sensitivity and specificity values were recorded from each study and used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six of 198 identified studies satisfied the eligibility criteria. Active compression, anterior slide, crank, and Speed tests were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves. The accuracy of the anterior slide test was significantly inferior to that of the active compression, crank, and Speed tests. There was no significant difference in test accuracy found among active compression, crank, and Speed tests. Between studies, methodological scores did not significantly affect sensitivity and specificity values.

CONCLUSION

The anterior slide test is a poor test for detecting the presence of a labral lesion in the shoulder. Active compression, crank, and Speed tests are more optimal choices. Clinicians should choose the active compression test first, crank second, and Speed test third when a labral lesion is suspected.

Superior labral tears of the shoulder: pathogenesis, evaluation, and treatment

Lesions of the superior glenoid labrum and biceps anchor are a well-recognized cause of shoulder pain. Advances in shoulder arthroscopy have led to improvements in recognizing and managing superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears. Recent biomechanical studies have postulated several theories for the pathogenesis of SLAP tears in throwing athletes and the effect of these injuries on normal shoulder kinematics. Advances in soft-tissue imaging techniques have resulted in improved accuracy in diagnosing SLAP tears. However, the diagnosis of clinically relevant SLAP tears remains challenging because of the lack of specific examination findings and the frequency of concomitant shoulder injuries. Definitive diagnosis of suspected SLAP tears is confirmed on arthroscopic examination. Advances in surgical techniques have made it possible to achieve secure repair in selected patterns of injury. Recent outcomes studies have shown predictably good functional results and an acceptable rate of return to sport and/or work with arthroscopic treatment of SLAP tears.

Clinical utility of traditional and new tests in the diagnosis of biceps tendon injuries and superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in the shoulder

BACKGROUND

Clinical tests are a key element in diagnosing shoulder lesions.

PURPOSE

This study examined the clinical utility of traditional and new examination tests, the upper cut for biceps injuries, and the modified dynamic labral shear for superior glenoid labral lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 325 consecutive patients who were seen for shoulder pain underwent a standardized clinical testing battery. Six clinical tests that have been previously reported in the literature (Yergason's, Speed's, bear hug, belly press, O'Brien's, and anterior slide) and 2 new examination tests (upper cut and modified dynamic labral shear) were performed. Clinical examination findings were correlated with findings in those who came to surgery (101 patients). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive/negative predictive value, and positive/negative likelihood ratio were calculated for each test. A binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine which tests produced the most significant findings.

RESULTS

For biceps disease, the bear hug and upper cut were most sensitive (0.79 and 0.73, respectively), whereas the belly press and Speed's test were most specific (0.85 and 0.81, respectively). The upper cut was most accurate (0.77) and produced the highest positive likelihood ratio (3.38). For labral injury, the modified dynamic labral shear demonstrated sensitivity of 0.72, specificity of 0.98, accuracy of 0.84, and a positive likelihood ratio of 31.57. A binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the combination of the upper cut and Speed's tests were significantly better at detecting biceps lesions (P = .021, R(2) = .400) than other tests, whereas labral lesions were best identified by combination of the modified dynamic labral shear and O'Brien's maneuvers (P = .045, R(2) = .641).

CONCLUSION

The new tests are helpful additions to the clinical examination for shoulder injury. The modified dynamic labral shear test demonstrates high scores for clinical utility and exhibits a high likelihood ratio, indicating a significant probability of affecting the clinical decision, which should moderately or significantly improve the diagnostic conclusion and allow the clinician to be more efficient in making an accurate diagnosis.

Internal impingement of the shoulder

Internal impingement of the shoulder is a pathologic condition characterized by excessive or repetitive contact of the greater tuberosity of the humeral head with the posterosuperior aspect of the glenoid when the arm is abducted and externally rotated. This arm positioning leads to rotator cuff and glenoid labrum impingement by the bony structures of the glenohumeral joint. Although some degree of contact between these structures occurs under normal conditions, to date most of the orthopaedic literature has focused on internal impingement as a disease state that affects overhead athletes and is characterized by the development of articular-sided rotator cuff tears and posterosuperior labral lesions. The precise cause of these impingement lesions remains unclear. However, it is believed that varying degrees of glenohumeral instability, posterior capsular contracture, and scapular dyskinesis may play a role in the development of symptomatic internal impingement. The purpose of this article is to review the pathomechanics, clinical complaints, physical examination findings, and imaging findings that are associated with internal impingement. The results of treatment will be reviewed, and a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for the management of internal impingement is presented.

Superior labral lesions anterior to posterior-evaluation and arthroscopic management

Lesions of the superior labrum are complex and difficult to both diagnose and treat effectively. The clinical diagnosis is challenging due to the nonspecific history and physical examination. MRI has substantially improved our ability to detect SLAP tears, although experience is necessary to distinguish pathologic findings from normal anatomic variants. Treatment is determined by patient age, functional demands, and the type of lesion identified.

SLAP lesions: an update on recognition and treatment

Superior labral tears (SLAP lesions) can pose a significant challenge to orthopaedic surgeons and rehabilitation specialists alike. Although advancement in arthroscopic techniques has enhanced arthroscopic repair of SLAP lesions, the clinical diagnosis of SLAP lesions can still be difficult. There is a variety of etiologic factors associated with SLAP lesions and a thorough clinical evaluation is crucial to make the diagnosis. Concomitant injury to the capsular-labral complex or rotator cuff is not uncommon and can further confuse the clinical presentation. The purpose of this paper is to review the pathomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment of SLAP lesions. We will specifically review some of the physical examination tests that are used to diagnose SLAP lesions and report on our technique of arthroscopic repair. Additionally, we will discuss the operative management of associated intra-articular pathology and, finally, we will briefly discuss our postoperative rehabilitation guidelines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis and treatment of SLAP tears using the Snyder classification

BACKGROUND

Superior labral anterior posterior lesions are a relatively rare entity, and classification as a basis for selection of treatment has remained a point of controversy.

HYPOTHESIS

There will be substantial interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis and treatment of superior labral anterior posterior tears by experienced arthroscopic specialists.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis), Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Compact discs containing 22 video vignettes of approximately 15 seconds duration were sent to the membership of the Arthroscopy Association of North America, American Shoulder and Elbow Society, and AOSSM. Each surgeon was asked to review the vignettes, classify the superior labral anterior posterior lesion type, and provide a treatment recommendation for each vignette. Seventy-three expert surgeons responded to the solicitation with a completed analysis. The same CD-ROM was re-sent to each of these 73 surgeons at a minimum of 12 months after the first viewing to obtain data on intraobserver reliability. Seventeen of the 73 surgeons returned this second CD-ROM with a complete analysis. Demographic data were also obtained from each surgeon. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the data, and 95% confidence intervals were established for each superior labral anterior posterior type (I-IV) with regard to diagnosis and treatment decision.

RESULTS

The 22 vignettes analyzed by 73 surgeons resulted in 1606 responses. Several significant trends were noticed with regard to diagnosis and treatment from the responses: (1) surgeons had difficulty distinguishing type III lesions from type IV lesions, (2) the treatment of type III lesions is much more variable than that of any other subtype, and (3) surgeons had difficulty distinguishing normal shoulders from type II superior labral anterior posterior tears. No relationship was identified between correct treatment decisions based on diagnosis and any of the demographic factors analyzed. Our analysis of intraobserver variability showed only moderate agreement. The analysis of interobserver variability improved significantly when the diagnoses were analyzed based on treatment decision.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial interobserver and intraobserver variability among experienced shoulder arthroscopic specialists with regard to diagnosis and treatment of superior labral anterior posterior tears. Intraobserver agreement using the Snyder classification indicated only moderate agreement. Analysis of interobserver agreement based on treatment decisions results in superior concordance among experienced surgeons for the diagnosis of superior labral anterior posterior lesions.

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for superior labral anterior posterior lesions: a systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review of case series and clinical trials that investigate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions.

BACKGROUND

Primary contact practitioners are often presented with shoulder problems and use a battery of clinical tests to reach a diagnosis. Early detection of SLAP pathology may lead to more optimal interventions and better outcomes for patients.

METHODS AND MEASURES

The OVID search interface was utilized with MEDLINE, AHMED, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases searched from 1996-2006. Studies were retrieved that included patients with shoulder pain who underwent at least 1 clinical shoulder test for SLAP lesions. For an article to be included in this review, the results of the clinical tests needed to be compared with findings on arthroscopy. Quality of the manuscripts included in this review were rated using the QUADAS appraisal tool, so comparisons could be made across studies.

RESULTS

Seventeen published manuscripts fit the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were used for this review. Eight studies were found to be of high quality. Within these 8 studies, 1 group of authors reported high diagnostic accuracy values for the crank test: sensitivity, 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76%-97%); specificity, 93% (95% CI, 79%-88%); positive likelihood ratio, 13.6 (95% CI, 3.6-52.1); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.1 (95% CI, 0.0-0.3). One study on the resisted supination external rotation test also scored high on the QUADAS and reported diagnostic accuracy values of 83% (95% CI, 66-92), 82% (95% CI, 52-95), 4.6 (95% CI, 1.3-16.1), and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.1-0.5), respectively. Of significance is the fact that the majority of papers reporting highly accurate clinical diagnostic tests were of low quality with the results not supported by other authors.

CONCLUSION

It appears that no single test is sensitive or specific enough to determine the presence of a SLAP lesion accurately. Further research is required to determine whether subgrouping of patients by mechanism of injury or the type of SLAP lesion may improve diagnostic accuracy. Determining the diagnostic accuracy of a combination of 2 or more tests is also needed.

A new SLAP test: the supine flexion resistance test

PURPOSE

This study describes a new test to detect SLAP lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values with respect to the diagnosis of a SLAP lesion were determined in comparison to Speed's test and the O'Brien test.

METHODS

One hundred fifty patients presenting for arthroscopic surgery with persisting pain or functional disability of the shoulder underwent a complete shoulder examination. All patients underwent Speed's test, the O'Brien test, and the new supine flexion resistance test. The clinical results of the tests were correlated with the presence of a SLAP lesion by direct arthroscopic visualization.

RESULTS

The supine flexion resistance test had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 69%, whereas Speed's test and the O'Brien test had sensitivities of 60% and 94%, respectively, and specificities of 38% and 28%, respectively. Regarding isolated SLAP lesions, the supine flexion resistance test was highly sensitive, with a sensitivity of 92% (58% for Speed's test and 75% for the O'Brien test). For isolated tears of the supraspinatus, the specificity of the supine flexion resistance test was 75% (14% for Speed's test and 17% for the O'Brien test).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the O'Brien test and Speed's test, the supine flexion resistance test proves to be more specific, with a specificity of 69% for the whole study population (28% for the O'Brien test and 38% for Speed's test) and with a specificity of 75% for the group of patients with isolated supraspinatus lesions (17% for the O'Brien test and 14% for Speed's test). The new test is a useful and effective test for detecting type II SLAP lesions. The high specificity enables the elimination of false-positive results of other clinical tests that are more sensitive but not specific.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, development of diagnostic criteria with consecutive patients and universally applied gold standard.

Physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions of the shoulder: a sensitivity analysis

PURPOSE

The overall purpose of our study was to examine the sensitivity of physical examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and magnetic resonance (MR) arthrogram for the identification of arthroscopically confirmed SLAP lesions of the shoulder.

METHODS

An analysis of 51 consecutive patients with arthroscopically confirmed SLAP lesions and no history of shoulder dislocation was performed. Before undergoing surgery, all patients underwent a standardized physical examination and had either an MRI and/or MR arthrogram performed. Sensitivity analysis was then performed on the results of both the physical examination maneuvers and the radiologic imaging compared to the arthroscopic findings at surgery.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of O'Brien's (active compression) test was 90%, whereas the Mayo (dynamic) shear was 80% and Jobe's relocation test was 76%. The sensitivity of a physical examination with any 1 of these 3 SLAP provocative tests being positive was 100%. Neer's sign (41%) and Hawkin's impingement tests (31%) each had low sensitivity for SLAP lesions. The sensitivity of MRI for SLAP lesions was 67% when interpreted by the performing surgeon, 53% when read by a radiologist. When the MR arthrograms were analyzed alone, the sensitivity was 72% (surgeon) and 50% (radiologist), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 physical examination maneuvers traditionally considered provocative for SLAP pathology (O'Brien's, Mayo shear, and Jobe's relocation) were sensitive for the diagnosis of SLAP lesions. MRI and MR arthrogram imaging had lower sensitivity than these physical examination tests in diagnosing SLAP lesions. Patient history, demographics, and the surgeon's physical examination should remain central to the diagnosis of SLAP lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, development of diagnostic criteria on basis of consecutive patients with universally applied gold standard.

The evaluation of various physical examinations for the diagnosis of type II superior labrum anterior and posterior lesion

BACKGROUND

Many types of physical examinations have been used to diagnose superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions; no decisive clinical test is available for confirming the diagnosis.

HYPOTHESIS

A selection from 10 well-established physical tests, alone or in combination, can be used to differentiate lesions with biceps anchor detachment from those with an intact biceps anchor with arthroscopic correlation.

STUDY DESIGN

Case control study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Among 297 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy between January 2004 and July 2005, 146 patients were enrolled in the study as a type II superior labrum anterior and posterior lesion group and an age-matched control group. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of each test and all possible combinations of 2 and 3 tests were analyzed. The same procedures were repeated in patients younger than and older than 40 years.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of the Whipple, O'Brien, apprehension, and compression-rotation tests and the specificities of the Yergason, biceps load II, and Kibler tests were relatively high. No single physical examination was found to be simultaneously highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of a type II superior labrum anterior and posterior lesion. When 2 of the 3 relatively sensitive tests (O'Brien, apprehension, or compression-rotation test) were combined with 1 of the 3 relatively specific tests (Speed, Yergason, or biceps load II test), sensitivity and specificity reached approximately 70% and 95%, respectively. Similar trends were noted in the younger and older patient groups and in the isolated type II superior labrum anterior and posterior lesion group.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that some combinations of 2 relatively sensitive clinical tests and 1 relatively specific clinical test increase the diagnostic efficacy of superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions. Requiring 1 of the 3 chosen tests to be positive will result in a sensitivity of about 75%, whereas requiring all 3 to be positive will result in a specificity of about 90%.

Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of history and physical examination for diagnosing glenoid labral tears

BACKGROUND

Glenoid labral tears provide a diagnostic challenge.

HYPOTHESIS

Combinations of items in the patient history and physical examination will provide stronger diagnostic accuracy to suggest the presence or absence of glenoid labral tear than will individual items.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

History and examination findings in patients with shoulder pain (N = 55) were compared with arthroscopic findings to determine diagnostic accuracy and intertester reliability.

RESULTS

The intertester reliability of the crank, anterior slide, and active compression tests was 0.20 to 0.24. A combined history of popping or catching and positive crank or anterior slide results yielded specificities of 0.91 and 1.00 and positive likelihood ratios of 3.0 and infinity, respectively. A positive anterior slide result combined with either a positive active compression or crank result yielded specificities of 0.91 and positive likelihood ratio of 2.75 and 3.75, respectively. Requiring only a single positive finding in the combination of popping or catching and the anterior slide or crank yielded sensitivities of 0.82 and 0.89 and negative likelihood ratios of 0.31 and 0.33, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of individual tests in previous studies is quite variable, which may be explained in part by the modest reliability of these tests. The combination of popping or catching with a positive crank or anterior slide result or a positive anterior slide result with a positive active compression or crank test result suggests the presence of a labral tear. The combined absence of popping or catching and a negative anterior slide or crank result suggests the absence of a labral tear.

An evaluation of the anatomic basis of the O'Brien active compression test for superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions

It has been suggested that the positive position of the O'Brien test (shoulder flexion, horizontal adduction, and internal rotation) tensions the bicipital labral complex relative to the negative position (shoulder flexion, horizontal adduction, and external rotation). This study measured active and passive tension in the long head of biceps in the 2 positions of the O'Brien test to validate the proposed anatomic basis of the test. Active tension was measured using surface electromyography of the long head of biceps in 12 healthy young adults. Passive tension was measured using a load cell attached to the intracapsular tendon of the long head of biceps in 5 cadaver specimens. Active and passive tension were higher in the negative position, thus refuting the proposed anatomic basis of the test. Although there may be an alternative basis for the test, the failure to support the proposed anatomic basis may partly explain the variable likelihood ratios obtained in clinical accuracy studies of the O'Brien test. The results of this study reinforce the need for anatomic validation during the development of clinical testing procedures.

The passive compression test: a new clinical test for superior labral tears of the shoulder

BACKGROUND

Even though there are several physical tests available for superior labrum anterior posterior lesions, there have been very few reports on their accuracy, and none can be regarded as completely predictive for the presence of a superior labrum anterior posterior lesion in the shoulder joint.

HYPOTHESIS

This new clinical test is a useful and accurate technique for detecting superior labral tears in the shoulder joint.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

This test was conducted independently by 2 physicians before any other diagnostic evaluation. In all cases, the glenohumeral joint was investigated first, and the appropriate treatments were performed on the lesion. A protocol was established to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of this new clinical test. The reproducibility of this test was evaluated with a kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (61 shoulders) were examined with the passive compression test, and all underwent arthroscopic surgery. In 31 patients with a positive passive compression test result, 27 had a superior labrum anterior posterior lesion, and in 30 patients with a negative passive compression test result, 6 had a superior labrum anterior posterior lesion. The sensitivity of the test was 81.8%, and the specificity was 85.7%. The positive predictive value was 87.1%, and the negative predictive value was 80.0%. The kappa coefficient was 0.771 between the 2 independent examiners (P< .01).

CONCLUSION

The passive compression test is a useful and accurate technique for predicting superior labral tears of the shoulder joint.

Prolonged immobilization in abduction and neutral rotation for a first-episode anterior shoulder dislocation

STUDY DESIGN

Case report.

BACKGROUND

Patients who sustain first-episode anterior glenohumeral dislocations are at risk to develop chronic glenohumeral instability. Current treatment options after an initial anterior glenohumeral dislocation include immediate surgery, delayed surgery, or conservative interventions such as immobilization and strengthening exercises. Duration of immobilization is variable among formal studies. Recent research suggests that typical immobilization positions may not allow adequate healing and in fact may promote glenohumeral joint instability.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The patient was a 19-year-old male who sustained a first-episode anterior glenohumeral dislocation during athletic activity. Physical therapy management included a longer-than-typical period of immobilization and protected activity to allow for more complete healing. The shoulder abduction and neutral rotation immobilization position used with this patient may increase healing of structures that influence stability of the shoulder

OUTCOMES

At 13 weeks after the dislocation, the patient had full active and passive range of motion, near normal strength, and no complaints of pain or instability. At a 20-month follow-up the patient had resumed full activities of daily living including recreational sports without symptoms of instability.

DISCUSSION

Conservative intervention options for first-episode anterior shoulder dislocations need further study. Immobilization and protected activity periods should be adequate to allow for complete healing. The optimal positions for immobilization should be determined and implemented.

[SLAP lesions: treatment.]

The advent of shoulder arthroscopy, as well as our improved understanding of shoulder anatomy and biomechanics, has led to the identification of previously undiagnosed lesions involving the superior labrum and biceps tendon anchor. Although the history and physical examinations as well as improved imaging modalities (arthro-MRI, arthro-CT) are extremely important in understanding the pathology, the definitive diagnosis of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions is accomplished through diagnostic arthroscopy. Treatment of these lesions is directed according to the type of SLAP lesion. Generally, type I did not need any treatment, type III are debrided, whereas type II and many type IV lesions are repaired. The purpose of this article is to review the anatomy, classification, diagnosis and current treatment recommendations of SLAP lesions.

Clinical assessment of superior glenoid labral lesions: a systematic review

Superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions of the glenoid have proven difficult to diagnose clinically. SLAP-lesion-specific physical examination tests have been developed to improve clinical acumen. Initial reported performance of these tests has not been reproduced by independent investigation. We hypothesized SLAP-specific physical examination tests could not provide a definitive diagnosis of a SLAP lesion. We further intended to elucidate factors responsible for the variable performance of SLAP-specific tests. A review of the literature through Medline and Embase database searches was conducted. All studies with level of evidence of III or better involved in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy of SLAP-specific physical examination tests were included and reviewed. Each instance of independent evaluation of a SLAP-specific examination showed poorer examination performance than in the originating study. Considerable variability existed between independent evaluations of a given SLAP-specific examination as well. We concluded SLAP-specific physical examination results cannot be used as the sole basis of a diagnosis of a SLAP lesion. Differences in patient populations between studies and the accompanying differences in SLAP lesion prevalence and comorbid conditions played the greatest role in test result variance.

Electromyographic analysis of physical examination tests for type II superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions

Physical examination tests that place tension on the long head of the biceps may best reproduce symptoms in patients with type II superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions. The objective of this study is to compare the normalized electromyographic signal of the long head of the biceps for SLAP lesion physical examination tests. The active compression test, anterior-superior SLAP test, biceps load test II, biceps tension test, and pain provocation test were performed on 13 subjects while biceps electromyographic data were recorded. The active compression test and biceps tension test had significantly higher electromyographic signals than the other tests. We found no significant differences when comparing forearm supination and pronation within individual tests. Because the active compression and biceps tension tests maximize muscle activation on the long head of the biceps, they may be the best physical examination tests by which to identify type II SLAP lesions.

Glenoid Labrum Lesion in an Elite Tennis Player: A Clinical Challenge in Diagnosis

Shoulder pain among overhead-sport athletes is common and often presents a challenge to clinicians in making an accurate diagnosis. A case report of a young college tennis player is presented, with emphasis on the clinical examination process leading to the diagnosis of a superior labrum anteroposterior lesion. The current literature regarding the clinical diagnosis of glenoid labrum lesion in the shoulder with respect to specific clinical tests was reviewed. It is recommended that clinicians consider glenoid labral lesions in the context of shoulder instability. Glenohumeral internal-rotation deficit should be routinely evaluated and corrected in high-performance tennis players.

Unstable isolated SLAP lesion: clinical presentation and outcome of arthroscopic fixation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical presentation and sensitivity of testing of unstable isolated SLAP (superior labrum anterior posterior) lesions and to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic treatment.

TYPE OF STUDY

Case series.

METHODS

A retrospective review was made of 44 unstable SLAP lesions in 41 patients (40 male, 1 female) who did not have other pathologic shoulder findings. The mean follow-up period was 33 months (range, 25 to 67 months) and the mean age at the time of surgery was 24 years (range, 17 to 43 years). Twenty-six patients had an injury on the dominant shoulder and 3 had bilateral shoulder involvement. Arthroscopic fixation was performed with the use of a biodegradable tack (Suretac; Acufex, Mansfield, MA) in 14 cases, and with a screw-type metallic suture anchor (mini-Revo; Linvatec, Largo, FL) in 30 cases.

RESULTS

Pain (100%) and clicking (57%) were the most common symptoms. The compression-rotation test was positive in 84% of the patients before surgery. The average UCLA score at the last follow-up was 32.3 points; 22 cases were graded excellent, 16 good, and 6 poor. Based on the postoperative performance data collected from 33 athletes, 25 of them (76%) were able to return to their athletic activities. Among them, throwing athletes showed statistically better performance than did nonthrowing athletes (P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain, followed by clicking, was the most common symptom, and the most common sign was a positive compression rotation test. Arthroscopic treatment of unstable isolated SLAP lesions resulted in good or excellent UCLA scores in 86% of the patients. Throwing athletes showed more satisfactory results than nonthrowing athletes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Type IV, case series with no, or historical, control group.

The resisted supination external rotation test: a new test for the diagnosis of superior labral anterior posterior lesions

PURPOSE

To evaluate a new clinical test, the resisted supination external rotation test, for the diagnosis of superior labral anterior posterior lesions of the shoulder.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Forty athletes (average age, 23.9 years) with activity-related shoulder pain were enrolled in the study. The patients underwent 3 different tests designed specifically to detect superior labral anterior posterior lesions (the resisted supination external rotation test, the crank test, and the active compression test); the tests were performed in a random order on the affected shoulder. The results of the tests were compared with arthroscopic findings.

RESULTS

Out of 40 athletes, 29 (72.5%) had superior labral anterior posterior tears. The resisted supination external rotation test had the highest sensitivity (82.8%), specificity (81.8%), positive predictive value (92.3%), negative predictive value (64.3%), and diagnostic accuracy (82.5%) of all tests performed.

CONCLUSION

By re-creating the peel-back mechanism, the resisted supination external rotation test is more accurate than 2 other commonly used physical examination tests designed to diagnose superior labral anterior posterior tears in overhead-throwing athletes. By using this test in the context of a thorough clinical history and physical examination, lesions of the superior labrum can be more reliably diagnosed.

Superior labrum, anterior-posterior lesions and biceps injuries: diagnostic and treatment considerations

Proximal biceps tendon rupture, biceps tendinitis, and medical biceps subluxation are injuries that occur alone and in association with other pathologic conditions of the shoulder. The literature describes various strategies for imaging and treating these biceps tendon complex injuries but offers no clear consensus on a gold-standard approach. The keys to successful treatment are an accurate diagnosis, identification of associated pathologic conditions, and assessment of functional limitations of the injury.

Current concepts in the recognition and treatment of superior labral (SLAP) lesions

Pathology of the superior aspect of the glenoid labrum (SLAP lesion) poses a significant challenge to the rehabilitation specialist due to the complex nature and wide variety of etiological factors associated with these lesions. A thorough clinical evaluation and proper identification of the extent of labral injury is important to determine the most appropriate nonoperative and/or surgical management. Postoperative rehabilitation is based on the specific surgical procedure as well as the extent, location, and mechanism of labral pathology and associated lesions. Emphasis is placed on protecting the healing labrum, while gradually restoring range of motion, strength, and dynamic stability of the glenohumeral joint. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the anatomy and pathomechanics of SLAP lesions and review specific clinical examination techniques used to identify these lesions, including 3 newly described tests. Furthermore, a review of the current surgical management and postoperative rehabilitation guidelines is provided.

An EMG-driven model of the upper extremity and estimation of long head biceps force

An electromyography (EMG) driven model of the upper extremity has been developed that incorporates musculoskeletal geometry of the glenohumeral and elbow joints, estimated relevant physiologic muscle parameters including optimal muscle lengths, and EMG activity. The model is designed to predict forces in muscles spanning the glenohumeral joint resulting from functionally relevant tasks. The model is composed of four sub-models that comprise a mathematical as well as graphical three-dimensional representation of the upper extremity: a musculoskeletal model for estimation of muscle-tendon lengths and moment arms, a Hill-based muscle force model, a model for estimating optimal muscle lengths, and a model for estimation of muscle activation from EMG signal of the biceps. The purpose of this paper is to describe the components of the model, as well as the data required to drive the model. Collection of data is described in the context of applying the model to determine biceps muscle forces for testing of functional tasks. Results obtained from applying the model to analyze the functional tasks are summarized, and model strengths and limitations are discussed.

The diagnosis and treatment of superior labrum, anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions

The advent of shoulder arthroscopy, as well as our improved understanding of shoulder anatomy and biomechanics, has led to the identification of previously undiagnosed lesions involving the superior labrum and biceps tendon anchor. Although the history and physical examination, as well as improved imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance arthrography, are extremely important in understanding the abnormalities, the definitive diagnosis of superior labrum, anterior and posterior lesions is best made through diagnostic arthroscopy. Treatment of these lesions is directed according to its type. In general, type I and III lesions are debrided, whereas type II and many type IV lesions are repaired. The purpose of this article is to review the anatomy, biomechanics, classification, diagnosis, and current treatment recommendations for these lesions, as well as to review the literature.

Diagnosis and Management of the Painful Shoulder. Part 2: Examination, Interpretation, and Management

Diagnosis, interpretation and subsequent management of shoulder pathology can be challenging to clinicians. Because of its proximal location in the schlerotome and the extensive convergence of afferent signals from this region to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, pain reference patterns can be broadly distributed to the deltoid, trapezius, and or the posterior scapular regions. This pain behavior can make diagnosis difficult in the shoulder region, as the location of symptoms may or may not correspond to the proximity of the pain generator. Therefore, a thorough history and reliable physical examination should rest at the center of the diagnostic process. Effective management of the painful shoulder is closely linked to a tissue-specific clinical examination. Painful shoulder conditions can present with or without limitations in passive and or active motion. Limits in passive motion can be classified as either capsular or noncapsular patterns. Conversely, patients can present with shoulder pain that demonstrates no limitation of motion. Bursitis, tendopathy and rotator cuff tears can produce shoulder pain that is challenging to diagnose, especially when they are the consequence of impingement and or instability. Numerous nonsurgical measures can be implemented in treating the painful shoulder, reserving surgical interventions for those patients who are resistant to conservative care.

Clinical testing for tears of the glenoid labrum

PURPOSE

With the increasing use of shoulder arthroscopy, diagnosis of glenoid labral lesions has become increasingly common. However, a physical examination maneuver that would allow a definitive clinical diagnosis of a glenoid labral tear, and more specifically a SLAP lesion, has been elusive. This study correlated the results of commonly used examination maneuvers with findings at shoulder arthroscopy. The working hypothesis was that 7 commonly used clinical tests, alone or in logical combinations, would provide diagnoses with reliability greater than the accepted standards for magnetic resonance imaging arthrography; i.e., greater than 95% sensitivity and specificity.

TYPE OF STUDY

Consecutive sample, sensitivity-specificity study.

METHODS

Sixty shoulders undergoing arthroscopy for a variety of pathologies were examined before surgery. All subjects submitted to the Speed test, an anterior apprehension maneuver, Yergason test, O'Brien test, Jobe relocation test, the crank test, and a test for tenderness of the bicipital groove. The examination results were compared with surgical findings and analyzed for sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of SLAP lesions and other glenoid labral tears.

RESULTS

The results of the O'Brien test (63% sensitive, 73% specific) and Jobe relocation test (44% sensitive, 87% specific) were statistically correlated with presence of a tear in the labrum and the apprehension test approached statistical significance. Performing all 3 tests and accepting a positive result for any of them increased the statistical value, although the sensitivity and specificity were still disappointingly low (72% and 73%, respectively). The other 4 tests were not found to be useful for labral tears, and none of the tests or combinations were statistically valid for specific detection of a SLAP lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical testing is useful in strengthening a diagnosis of a glenoid labral lesion, but the sensitivity and specificity are relatively low. Thus a decision to proceed with surgery should not be based on clinical examination alone.

A review of the special tests associated with shoulder examination. Part II: laxity, instability, and superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions

This is the second of a two-part article describing the various tests that have been used to examine the shoulder to find and treat problems in that area. Part I of this article (January/February 2003, pages 154-160) focused on tests used to examine rotator cuff abnormalities. This article attempts to clarify the tests of laxity, instability, and the superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions by presenting them as described by the original authors, with the additional aim of providing a source for those wishing to refresh their knowledge without the need to refer to the original source material.

The crank test, the O'Brien test, and routine magnetic resonance imaging scans in the diagnosis of labral tears

BACKGROUND

Tears of the superior labrum of the shoulder, anterior to posterior, are difficult to diagnose clinically.

PURPOSE

We examined whether the crank or O'Brien tests were reliable tools for detecting glenoid labral tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Nonrandomized prospective study.

METHODS

Results of diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy were compared with those of the preoperative tests and magnetic resonance imaging for 65 patients who had symptoms of shoulder pain.

RESULTS

The crank test result was positive in 29 patients (45%), and the O'Brien test was positive in 41 patients (63%). The crank test had a positive predictive value of 41%, was 56% specific, 46% sensitive, and had a negative predictive value of 61%. The O'Brien test had a positive predictive value of 34%, was 31% specific, 54% sensitive, and had a negative predictive value of 50%. Magnetic resonance imaging had a positive predictive value of 63%, was 92% specific, 42% sensitive, and had a negative predictive value of 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

The O'Brien and crank tests were not sensitive clinical indicators for detecting glenoid labral tears and other tears of the anterior and posterior labrum. Results were often falsely positive for patients with other shoulder conditions, including impingement or rotator cuff tears.

Results of arthroscopic treatment of superior labral lesions

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of arthroscopic repair of isolated superior labral lesions of the shoulder.

METHODS

We evaluated thirty-four patients at a mean of thirty-three months (range, twenty-four to forty-nine months) following arthroscopic repair of an isolated superior labral lesion of the shoulder with suture anchors. The outcome of treatment was evaluated with the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score and on the basis of the patient's ability to return to prior activities. There were thirty male patients and four female patients with a mean age of twenty-six years (range, sixteen to thirty-five years). Thirty patients were involved in athletic activities, and eighteen of them were engaged in overhead sports.

RESULTS

Repair of the superior labral lesion resulted in a satisfactory University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score for thirty-two patients (94%) and an unsatisfactory score for two. Thirty-one patients (91%) regained their preinjury level of shoulder function. The shoulder score and the return to activity were correlated with the type of sports activity (r = 0.291, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.373, p = 0.010, respectively. Patients participating in overhead sports had significantly lower shoulder scores and a lower percentage of return to their preinjury level of shoulder function compared with patients who were not engaged in overhead activity (p = 0.024 and 0.015, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic repair of an isolated superior labral lesion is successful in a majority of patients. However, the results in patients who participate in overhead sports are not as satisfactory as those in patients who are not involved in overhead sports.