Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: A favorable alternative in simple and complicated appendicitis

Pediatric laparoscopic surgery--Indian scenario

Laparpscopic Surgery/Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) in children have witnessed tremendous progress in the last decade. Presently, there are extensive applications of this novel technique and several advanced level intricate surgeries have been done safely in small children. This is a brief overview of the common indications and utility of MIS in pediatric practice in the Indian Scenario. We discuss some common clinical settings like recurrent abdominal pain, Impalpable testis, intersex disorders Empyema, Thoracis etc., where MIS has had a significant benefit. We also present our experience of MIS in children without using any sophisticated equipment like the harmonic scalpel, endo-staplers etc. MIS has come to stay and it will definitely have lasting impact on surgical problems in children.

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children with uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis

PURPOSE

To address whether laparoscopic appendectomy could be an alternative to conventional open appendectomy in children with complicated appendicitis as well as uncomplicated appendicitis, a retrospective study comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomies was performed.

METHODS

One hundred patients who were treated by immediate appendectomy, either laparoscopically or by the open method, between May 2000 and August 2003 were included in the study. There were 53 patients in the laparoscopic appendectomy group and 47 patients in the open appendectomy group.

RESULTS

The operating time was significantly longer for laparoscopic appendectomy than for open appendectomy (P < .001). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated appendicitis (P = .001). Thirteen of the 100 patients (13.0%) had 15 postoperative complications including wound infection (n = 8), intraabdominal abscess (n = 4), stitch abscess (n = 2), and small bowel obstruction (n = 1). In both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, there was no significant difference between laparoscopic and open appendectomies in the complication rates, and the incidences of each complication did not differ between the procedures. Among the 14 patients with generalized peritonitis, postoperative complications were seen in 5 patients (35.7%). Although the presence of generalized peritonitis was associated significantly with postoperative complications (P = .017), there was no significant association between the procedure and complications. Overall treatment costs were increased by 26.0% in laparoscopic appendectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic appendectomy should remain an option in children with uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, and when laparoscopy is selected, consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of the procedure is essential.

Outcome after intra- and extra-corporeal laparoscopic appendectomy techniques

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the outcome after intracorporeal (IC) and extracorporeal (EC) laparoscopic appendectomy technique in a single institution over a 5-year period.

METHODS

Records of all children ( n = 60) who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at the Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital between February 1997 and March 2002 were retrieved and evaluated. Observations were made regarding operative technique, anesthetic time, intra- and postoperative complications, postoperative analgesic requirement, and postoperative hospital stay.

RESULTS

There were 30 children in each group who had a similar demographic profile. The magnitude of appendicitis severity in both groups was similar. The mean anesthetic time was 67.8 min for the IC group and 50.7 min for the EC group (p = 0.001). There were no recorded intraoperative complications, although a single case in the EC group required conversion to open procedure. The postoperative analgesic requirement in both groups was similar. The mean postoperative stay was 2.1 days in the IC group and 2.5 days in the EC group. Two postoperative complications were noted in the IC group; one intraperitoneal collection and one postoperative chest infection. Four complications occurred in the EC group; one intraperitoneal collection and three minor port-site wound infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' experience shows the EC technique to be significantly quicker, although with a slightly increased complication rate. Either technique can be applied safely for acute appendicitis.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: Technically Feasible and Safe in All Stages of Acute Appendicitis

This is a retrospective outcomes analysis of pediatric open and laparoscopic appendectomy in a children's hospital. One hundred three children underwent appendectomy for appendicitis by two pediatric surgeons from August 1998 to December 2002. Patients were divided into two groups, laparoscopic appendectomy (LAP) and open appendectomy (OAP), and were further subdivided by diagnosis: normal (NL), acute (AA), and ruptured (RA). There were no differences in age, sex, race, or zip codes between groups. Median age was 10 years. In the acute phase, 28 patients underwent OAP and 65 underwent LAP whereas 10 patients underwent interval appendectomy (IA) 6 weeks after percutaneous drainage of established abscesses (eight were LAP vs two OAP). In the remaining patients, the appendix was normal in 17 (18.4%) and ruptured in 24 (25.8%) pathologically. LAP took longer to perform (57 minutes vs 34.5 minutes) at higher cost ($3718 vs $1858) than OAP. Overall complications were lower in the LAP group (17% vs 29%), and LAP for RA had significantly fewer total complications (25% vs 62.5%). Intra-abdominal abscess increased following LAP: 9.2 per cent versus 3.6 per cent. Length of stay was shorter for LAP versus OAP in both AA (2.0 vs 2.5 days) and RA (5.5 vs 7 days).

Is delayed operative treatment worth the trouble with perforated appendicitis is children?

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30% to 50% of appendicitis in children is already perforated at presentation. The optimal management of these children remains controversial.

METHODS

Ninety-six children (aged 2 to 16 years) were treated for perforated appendicitis. Seventy-one underwent immediate appendectomy and drainage of abscess, if present (group I). In the other 25 an attempt was made to treat with intravenous antibiotics, combined with transrectal (4) or percutaneous (2) drainage of abscess. This treatment was successful in 16 patients (group II), who underwent appendectomy 6 to 8 weeks later, and unsuccessful in 9 patients (group III), who underwent appendectomy 3 to 12 days later.

RESULTS

The mean length of stay was as follows: group I, 6.7 days; group II, 8.9 days; and group III, 10.9 days (not significant). The white blood cell count (WBC) at presentation was group I, 18.6 K; group II, 17.9 K; group III, 18.8 K. The percent fall of WBC on day 4 was group I, 55%; group II, 25.5%; group III, 17% (P >0.05 versus groups I and II). Twenty of 71 patients in group I (28%) developed wound infection (5), pelvic abscess (14), and pancreatitis (1), while 2 of 16 (12.5%) of group II and 1 of 9 (11%) of group III patients required readmission (both P <0.05 versus group I).

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that initial antibiotic treatment of perforated appendicitis in children, followed by interval appendectomy, is useful for a select group who present with little or no peritonitis, slightly elevated temperature, and WBC that falls at least 25% within 3 to 4 days.

Current concepts in minimal access surgery for children

Since the introduction of minimal access surgery to general surgeons in the 1980s, pediatric surgeons have been employing this innovative technology to perform surgery on children. Video technology and miniaturized instruments have brought the laboratory to the operating room; in many cases several small incisions are the only access necessary to perform complicated procedures that would otherwise require a large wound. Additional benefits of minimal access surgery may include reduced postoperative analgesic requirements, shortened length of stay, and faster resumption of normal activities. Increased operative costs offset some of these gains. The pediatric surgical community has embraced minimal access techniques for some operations; others remain controversial.