Less pain does equal better quality of life following strontium-89 therapy for metastatic prostate cancer

Quality of life and pain relief during treatment with calcitriol and docetaxel in symptomatic metastatic androgen-independent prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current study evaluated the analgesic activity and impact on quality of life (QOL) of a new chemotherapy regimen of calcitriol and docetaxel in men with androgen-independent prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

Analgesic response was defined as a 2-point reduction on the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) scale (or compete relief if baseline PPI was 1) without an increase in analgesic use or a 50% decrease in analgesic medication use without an increase in pain, maintained for > or = 4 weeks. Pain, pain medication consumption, and QOL (measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30) were evaluated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Treatment resulted in an analgesic response in 14 of 29 evaluable patients (48%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 30-67%). The median time to symptomatic progression in the 14 patients who met criteria for analgesic response was 41 weeks (95% CI, 26-56 weeks). Worsening in physical and role functioning, fatigue, appetite, and global health status and improvement in constipation were detected using the QLQ-C30 QOL questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant analgesic activity was demonstrated, although worsening in several QOL domains was observed in a patient population with relatively low pain intensity (median PPI, 2).

Strontium89 Chloride versus Palliative Local Field Radiotherapy in Patients with Hormonal Escaped Prostate Cancer: A Phase III Study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group

OBJECTIVES

To compare toxicity, subjective response rate, time to subjective progression and overall survival in patients with painful bone metastases of hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) treated with a single intravenous injection of 150MBq (4mCi) Strontium(89) Chloride (S) or palliative local field radiotherapy (R) with the usual radiotherapy regimen used at each centre. The costs of both treatments were also assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

101 patients were randomized to S and 102 to R. Time to event endpoints were compared with the Logrank test and Kaplan-Meier curves, in the intent-to-treat population (2-sided alpha=0.05).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. There was a borderline statistically significant difference in overall survival in favour of the local field radiotherapy (R: 11 months; S: 7.2 months; p=0.0457). There was no difference in progression-free survival or time to progression. Subjective response was seen in 34.7% in the S-arm and in 33.3% in the R-arm. A biochemical response was observed in 10% and 13% of the R- and S-groups, respectively. There was no difference in treatment toxicity between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic HRPC, pain treatment with local field radiotherapy is associated with a better overall survival compared to Strontium(89). The lower costs of local field radiotherapy also favour the use of this treatment in patients with HRPC. The reason for the apparent survival benefit of localised radiation treatment is not clear.

The Effect of Pain on Health-Related Quality of Life in the Immediate Postoperative Period

The hypothesis of this study was to determine if the severity of postoperative pain would affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) in the immediate postoperative period (within 2 wk of surgery). We designed this study as a prospective, nonrandomized observational trial in a tertiary academic care center. Patients undergoing elective total hip or knee replacement surgery were eligible. Patients received a standardized intraoperative general or epidural anesthetic followed by IV patient-controlled analgesia or patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Short Form (SF)-12, visual analog scores for pain at rest and pain with activity, nausea, and itching were assessed on postoperative days 1-5, 7, and 14. The severity of pain correlated with a decrease in both the physical and mental component of the SF-12. The severity of nausea correlated with a decrease in the mental but not physical component of the SF-12. The severity of itching did not correlate with a change in the SF-12. Our findings suggest that an increase in postoperative pain will decrease a patient's quality of life in the immediate postoperative period; however, several methodologic issues exist when assessing HRQL in the immediate postoperative period.

IMPLICATIONS

Severity of postoperative pain may affect quality of life.

Role of strontium-89 as adjuvant to palliative external beam radiotherapy is questionable: results of a double-blind randomized study

PURPOSE

To explore the efficacy of adjuvant (89)Sr applied with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to treat bone metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-five patients were randomized to (89)Sr (Arm A) or saline (Arm B) on Day 1 of EBRT to demonstrate a reduction in 3-month physician-assessed subjective progression from 70% to 45%.

RESULTS

At 3 and 6 months, no difference between treatment arms was observed in the progression rate. At 3 months, the physician-assessed response rate for all patients was 25%, with 46% of the patients progressing. The pretreatment use of opiates was independently associated with short progression-free survival. On the basis of the quality-of-life assessments, pain relief occurred in 50% of patients and 32% experienced improvement in global quality of life, without impact from (89)Sr. Differences were observed between the physician evaluation of radiotherapy efficacy and the patient assessment. In Arm A, serum alkaline phosphatase, but not serum prostate-specific antigen, decreased during the first 3 months after treatment.

CONCLUSION

(89)Sr, adjuvant to ERBT, does not seem to reduce the number of patients with subjective progression at 3 months. Patients should be referred for palliative RT before their bone pain requires high doses of opiates. In radiotherapy trials, the evaluation of pain and pain relief remains problematic because of the confounding use of analgesics.

Advances in supportive care of patients with cancer and bone metastases: nursing implications of zoledronic acid

The knowledge and training of nursing staff is essential for the safety and comfort of patients receiving i.v. therapies. The use of i.v. bisphosphonates as an adjunct to standard antineoplastic therapies in patients with advanced cancer is becoming widespread. Zoledronic acid and pamidronate (Zometa and Aredia, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ) are nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Pamidronate has been the standard of care for patients with osteolytic bone lesions from breast cancer or multiple myeloma. However, zoledronic acid, which has demonstrated increased potency and a broad clinical utility, is emerging as the new standard of care. In addition to treating hypercalcemia of malignancy, zoledronic acid is approved for treating patients with bone metastases (osteolytic or osteoblastic) from a wide range of solid tumors, including breast, prostate, and lung cancers, or osteolytic bone lesions from multiple myeloma. Zoledronic acid (4 mg via a 15-minute infusion) has a safety profile comparable with pamidronate (90 mg via a two-hour infusion) and has demonstrated comparable or superior efficacy to that of pamidronate in every patient population tested. The shorter infusion time of zoledronic acid compared with that of pamidronate may provide added convenience, but safety guidelines should be followed for all i.v. bisphosphonate therapies. These guidelines and nursing care of patients receiving i.v. bisphosphonates are reviewed.

The physical burden of prostate cancer

The physical burden of prostate cancer is considerable and affects quality of life in men with both localized and metastatic disease. This physical impact results as much from treatment for prostate cancer as from the disease itself. In advanced disease, although patients can experience considerable pain and discomfort from bony lesions, they also can experience bothersome fatigue and sleep disturbances from institution of hormone ablation therapy. In localized disease, although patients can have lower urinary tract symptoms from untreated prostate cancer, all aggressive treatments can result in urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction that can bother the patient and affect quality of life. Patients and providers must be vigilantly aware of the physical burden of prostate cancer when initiating treatment for this disease and during follow up after treatment. By being cognizant of the physical impact of prostate cancer on quality of life, providers can address patients' problems early in their course of treatment and maximize patients' HRQOL and overall satisfaction with care.

Health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Quality of life is of great concern to patients considering treatment options for prostate cancer. In the absence of clinical trial data clearly demonstrating that a particular treatment is superior to another for localized prostate cancer, in terms of cause specific survival, patients may value quality of life as much as quantity of life. The goal of this review is to familiarize the reader with the methodology of quality of life research and to review the recent literature on quality of life outcomes in prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A structured MEDLINE review of literature on health related quality of life in prostate cancer for the years 1995 to 2001 was performed, and was augmented with highly relevant articles from additional selected journals.

RESULTS

In the case of advanced or metastatic disease, where the goal of treatment is palliation and symptom-free survival, quality of life often becomes the primary desired outcome. In localized disease all treatments affect health related quality of life, although the impact of each therapy on sexual, urinary and bowel function is unique.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a highly personal and subjective entity, health related quality of life can be assessed using rigorous and scientifically stringent methods from the field of psychometric test theory. A substantial amount of literature exists regarding the use of established and validated instruments for assessing the impact of prostate cancer and its treatment on health related quality of life. This information is of critical importance when counseling men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer regarding treatment choices and is also helpful in setting appropriate expectations for men with metastatic disease.

Costs of prostate cancer, metastatic to the bone, in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

To quantify medical costs associated with bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer. Bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer are associated with considerable morbidity, negatively impact quality of life, and can add substantially to medical costs, given a median survival of 30-35 months from diagnosis of bone metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective cost analysis from both a community and university hospital in The Netherlands was conducted. Twenty-eight patient records (14 from each hospital) were investigated to assess the impact of skeletal-related events (SREs), including fractures, spinal cord compression, and radiotherapy, on total direct medical costs and cost of hospitalization. Costs are given in EUROS (Euros).

RESULTS

The average total cost of treatment was Euros 13,051 per patient over the 24-month follow-up period, which includes an average cost of Euros 6973 per patient to treat SREs. Treatment of SREs more than doubled total treatment costs. Patients in this analysis experienced, on average, one SRE per year, and the cost of SREs varied from Euros 1187 to Euros 40,948.

CONCLUSIONS

Occurrence of SREs contributes significantly to the cost of care for patients with advanced prostate cancer. These data suggest that bisphosphonates, which can reduce pain and SREs, may reduce healthcare costs.

Phase I dose escalation clinical trial of adenovirus vector carrying osteocalcin promoter-driven herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase in localized and metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Osteocalcin (OC), a major noncollagenous bone matrix protein, is expressed prevalently in prostate cancer epithelial cells, adjacent fibromuscular stromal cells, and osteoblasts in locally recurrent prostate cancer and prostate cancer bone metastasis [Matsubara, S., Wada, Y., Gardner, T.A., Egawa, M., Park, M.S., Hsieh, C.L., Zhau, H.E., Kao, C., Kamidono, S., Gillenwater, J.Y., and Chung, L.W. (2001). Cancer Res. 61, 6012-6019]. We constructed an adenovirus vector carrying osteocalcin promoter-driven herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (Ad-OC-hsv-TK) to cotarget prostate cancer cells and their surrounding stromal cells. A phase I dose escalation clinical trial of the intralesional administration of Ad-OC-hsv-TK followed by oral valacyclovir was conducted at the University of Virginia (Charlottesville, VA) in 11 men with localized recurrent and metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (2 local recurrent, 5 osseous metastasis, and 4 lymph node metastasis) in order to determine the usefulness of this vector for the palliation of androgen-independent prostate cancer metastasis. This is the first clinical trial in which therapeutic adenoviruses are injected directly into prostate cancer lymph node and bone metastasis. Results show that (1). all patients tolerated this therapy with no serious adverse events; (2). local cell death was observed in treated lesions in seven patients (63.6%) as assessed by TUNEL assay, and histomorphological change (mediation of fibrosis) was detected in all posttreated specimens; (3). one patient showed stabilization of the treated lesion for 317 days with no alternative therapy. Of the two patients who complained of tumor-associated symptoms before the treatment, one patient with bone pain had resolution of pain, although significant remission of treated lesions was not observed by image examination; (4). CD8-positive T cells were predominant compared with CD4-positive T cells, B cells (L26 positive), and natural killer cells (CD56 positive) in posttreated tissue specimens; (5). levels of HSV TK gene transduction correlated well with coxsackie-adenovirus receptor expression but less well with the titers of adenovirus injected; and (6). intrinsic OC expression and the efficiency of HSV TK gene transduction affected the levels of HSV TK protein expression in clinical specimens. Our data suggest that this form of gene therapy requires further development for the treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer metastasis although histopathological and immunohistochemical evidence of apoptosis was observed in the specimens treated. Further studies including the development of viral delivery will enhance the efficacy of Ad-OC-hsv-TK.

Efficacy of zoledronic acid and pamidronate in breast cancer patients: a comparative analysis of randomized phase III trials

Results of a large, randomized, comparative phase III trial involving 1,130 breast cancer patients demonstrated that 4 mg zoledronic acid and 90 mg pamidronate were equally effective at reducing the occurrence and delaying the onset of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases secondary to breast cancer. However, zoledronic acid has demonstrated a treatment advantage over pamidronate with respect to the proportion of patients receiving radiation therapy to bone. Moreover, among patients with at least one osteolytic lesion (N = 352), zoledronic acid achieved a 17% reduction in the proportion of patients with a skeletal-related event compared with pamidronate and significantly prolonged the time to first event. In general, zoledronic acid and pamidronate had comparable effects on time to progression of bone metastases, overall disease progression, pain and analgesia scores, and overall survival. Both zoledronic acid and pamidronate effectively suppressed markers of bone resorption. However, zoledronic acid demonstrated a greater and more sustained suppressive effect. Zoledronic acid (4 mg via 15-minute infusion) also demonstrated a safety profile similar to that of pamidronate (90 mg via 2-hour infusion). In summary, the increased efficacy of zoledronic acid in specific patient subsets and the convenience of a 15-minute infusion suggest that 4 mg zoledronic acid has advantages over 90 mg pamidronate for treatment of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Effects of docetaxel on pain due to metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer

Bone pain commonly plagues patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer. Studies of mitoxantrone demonstrated that chemotherapy can substantially reduce this debilitating symptom. Two of the available studies examining the use of docetaxel with and without estramustine for treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer include a detailed prospective analysis of pain and quality of life. One study required patients to have pain at entry and demonstrated significant improvement in pain. The second study enrolled patients with low prevalence and intensity of pain and did not demonstrate pain relief. The available results, although preliminary, suggest that patients with significant bone pain due to androgen-independent prostate cancer can experience substantial pain relief with docetaxel-based therapy. Larger randomized studies targeting patients with sufficient prevalence and intensity of pain are needed to refine our understanding of the contribution of docetaxel to pain control in this patient population.

Medical management and adjuvant therapies in spinal metastatic disease

Metastatic spinal tumors are an increasingly common and difficult problem encountered by neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. To improve therapies and increase life expectancy for patients with tumors such as those of the breast and prostate, a global, systematic approach is required to maximize the preservation of neurological function, maintenance of spinal stability, and relief of pain, all with the ultimate goal of improved functional capacity and quality of life (QOL). Although radiotherapy and surgery are still the primary therapeutic options, several new adjuvant therapies initially implemented to control pain more effectively have also been shown to reduce overall skeleton-related complications (pathological fractures and hypercalcemia) and may ultimately improve and extend QOL. This more global approach to spinal metastases also includes optimizing each patient's overall medical condition and potential for healing (that is, nutrition), as well as avoiding potential complications associated with metastatic disease (such as deep vein thrombosis), including excessive blood loss in the case of renal metastasis. A thorough knowledge and understanding of these therapeutic adjuvants is required to optimize care and to respond to our increasingly medically knowledgable patient population whose access to prevalent medical information has been increased because of the internet.