High-dose melphalan versus melphalan plus dexamethasone for AL amyloidosis

Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Dexamethasone for Light-Chain Amyloidosis

PURPOSE

Oral melphalan and dexamethasone (MDex) were considered a standard of care in light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. In the past decade, bortezomib has been increasingly used in combination with alkylating agents and dexamethasone. We prospectively compared the efficacy and safety of MDex and MDex with the addition of bortezomib (BMDex).

METHODS

This was a phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. Patients were stratified according to cardiac stage. Patients with advanced cardiac stage (stage IIIb) amyloidosis were not eligible. The primary end point was hematologic response rate at 3 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01277016.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients, 53 in the BMDex and 56 in the MDex group, received ≥ 1 dose of therapy (from January 2011 to February 2016). Hematologic response rate at 3 months was higher in the BMDex arm (79% v 52%; P = .002). Higher rates of very good partial or complete response rates (64% v 39%; hazard ratio [HR], 2.47; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.71) and improved overall survival, with a 2-fold decrease in mortality rate (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.90), were observed in the BMDex arm. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events (the most common being cytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and heart failure) were more common in the BMDex arm, occurring in 20% versus 10% of cycles performed.

CONCLUSION

BMDex improved hematologic response rate and overall survival. To our knowledge, this is the first time a controlled study has demonstrated a survival advantage in AL amyloidosis. BMDex should be considered a new standard of care for AL amyloidosis.

A study from The Mayo Clinic evaluated long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation in patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis

Longer survival using modern therapies has increased the number of patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis receiving kidney transplantation. We evaluated 60 patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis who underwent kidney transplantation based on their hematologic response for outcomes of death, graft failure, and complications. Patient hematologic responses (light-chain in blood or urine) prior to kidney transplantation were three patients had no response, five had a partial response, six had a very good partial response, 37 had a complete response, and nine were treatment-naive patients (never treated for this disorder). After transplantation, seven of nine treatment-naive patients achieved a complete response. The median follow-up for the entire transplant cohort was 61 months. The estimated median overall survival from the time of kidney transplantation was 123 months for the entire group. Median overall survival was not reached for the very good partial response plus complete response groups, it was 47 months for no response plus partial response groups, and 117 months for the treatment-naive group (all significantly different). Median overall survival of very good partial response was 81 months, while the median was not reached in the complete response group (no significant difference). The time to amyloid recurrence was significantly longer in complete response compared to very good partial response (median 181 vs 81 months). Death-censored graft survival at one- and five-years was 98.3%, and 95.8%, respectively for all groups. Of the 60 patients, three had allograft failure, 19 died with a functioning graft, and 13 had an amyloid recurrence. Thus, outcomes after kidney transplant in patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis seem acceptable if a very good partial response or complete response is achieved either before or after transplantation.

Time to Redefine Risk-Stratification and Response Criteria in Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis?

Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis results from clonal plasma cell (PC)-derived immunoglobulin light chain-mediated end-organ dysfunction, the extent and severity of which predicts survival. Anti-PC therapies reduce clonal light chain burden, which usually results in improvement of organ function, and consequently overall survival. Response assessment is critical to gauge therapeutic efficacy, to report clinical trial outcomes, and to switch therapy in those without response. Response in AL amyloidosis is 2-fold: hematologic response and organ response (OR). Depth of hematologic response is graded on the basis of serum free light chain (sFLC) parameters, but assessment of OR is binary. The role of normal sFLC ratio or complete remission as a treatment end point has been challenged, thus highlighting the need to quantify involved FLC and residual PC beyond the normal sFLC ratio to possibly account for the ongoing organ damage seen in some patients with complete remission. Mass spectrometry and urinary exosome represent ultrasensitive strategies to estimate involved FLC below the detection threshold of current sFLC assays. The role of new sFLC parameters and minimal residual disease as potential prognostic parameters has been recognized. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and 24-hour proteinuria:estimated glomerular filtration rate ratio were identified to overcome certain limitations of N-terminal-Pro-BNP, 24-hour proteinuria, and estimated glomerular filtration rate for cardiac and renal response assessment, respectively. Use of monoclonal antibodies targeting PC and amyloid deposits has expanded the therapeutic armamentarium of AL amyloidosis, and given their excellent efficacy, early ORs are reported. This review provides insights into recent advances in the risk-stratification and response assessment of patients with AL amyloidosis in light of the changing therapeutic paradigms. Incorporation of these advancements into formal consensus guidelines would require further validation.

Systemic Amyloidosis Recognition, Prognosis, and Therapy: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Many patients with systemic amyloidosis are underdiagnosed. Overall, 25% of patients with immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis die within 6 months of diagnosis and 25% of patients with amyloid transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis die within 24 months of diagnosis. Effective therapy exists but is ineffective if end-organ damage is severe.

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based recommendations that could allow clinicians to diagnose this rare set of diseases earlier and enable accurate staging and counseling about prognosis.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A comprehensive literature search was conducted by a reference librarian with publication dates from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019. Key search terms included amyloid, amyloidosis, nephrotic syndrome, heart failure preserved ejection fraction, and peripheral neuropathy. Exclusion criteria included case reports, non-English-language text, and case series of fewer than 10 patients. The authors independently selected and appraised relevant literature.

FINDINGS

There was a total of 1769 studies in the final data set. Eighty-one articles were included in this review, of which 12 were randomized clinical trials of therapy that included 3074 patients, 9 were case series, and 3 were cohort studies. The incidence of AL amyloidosis is approximately 12 cases per million persons per year and there is an estimated prevalence of 30 000 to 45 000 cases in the US and European Union. The incidence of variant ATTR amyloidosis is estimated to be 0.3 cases per year per million persons with a prevalence estimate of 5.2 cases per million persons. Wild-type ATTR is estimated to have a prevalence of 155 to 191 cases per million persons. Amyloidosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of adult nondiabetic nephrotic syndrome; heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, particularly if restrictive features are present; unexplained hepatomegaly without imaging abnormalities; peripheral neuropathy with distal sensory symptoms, such as numbness, paresthesia, and dysesthesias (although the autonomic manifestations occasionally may be the presenting feature); and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance with atypical clinical features. Staging can be performed using blood testing only. Therapeutic decision-making for AL amyloidosis involves choosing between high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplant or bortezomib-based chemotherapy. There are 3 therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for managing ATTR amyloidosis, depending on clinical phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

All forms of amyloidosis are underdiagnosed. All forms now have approved therapies that have been demonstrated to improve either survival or disability and quality of life. The diagnosis should be considered in patients that have a multisystem disorder involving the heart, kidney, liver, or nervous system.

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: 2020 update on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis is a clonal, nonproliferative plasma cell disorder in which fragments of immunoglobulin light or heavy chain are deposited in tissues. Clinical features depend on organs involved but can include heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, nephrotic syndrome, hepatic dysfunction, peripheral/autonomic neuropathy, and "atypical smoldering multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy undetermined significance (MGUS)."

DIAGNOSIS

Tissue biopsy stained with Congo red demonstrating amyloid deposits with apple-green birefringence is required for diagnosis. Invasive organ biopsy is not required in 85% of patients. Verification that amyloid is composed of immunoglobulin light chains is mandatory. The gold standard is laser capture mass spectroscopy.

PROGNOSIS

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), serum troponin T, and difference between involved and uninvolved immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) values are used to classify patients into four groups of similar size; median survivals are 94.1, 40.3, 14.0, and 5.8 months.

THERAPY

All patients with a systemic amyloid syndrome require therapy to prevent deposition of amyloid in other organs and prevent progressive organ failure. Stem cell transplant (SCT) is preferred, but only 20% of patients are eligible. Requirements for safe SCT include systolic blood pressure >90 mmHg, troponin T < 0.06 ng/mL and serum creatinine ≤1.7 mg/dL. Nontransplant candidates can be offered cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone or daratumumab-containing regimens as it appears to be highly active in AL amyloidosis.

FUTURE CHALLENGES

Delayed diagnosis remains a major obstacle to initiating effective therapy prior to the development of end-stage organ failure.

Diagnosis and management of systemic light chain AL amyloidosis

AL amyloidosis is a plasma cell disorder leading to the production and extracellular deposition of abnormal immunoglobulin light chains called amyloid. The pathogenesis of the disorder is driven by an abnormal plasma cell clone producing excessive monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains that undergo deposition in various organs of the body such as the heart, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract. The outcome of the disease remains poor with significant morbidity and mortality associated with organ dysfunction. In this review, we describe the current standard diagnostic features, prognosis, and current treatment paradigm of the disease.

Rapid decline in ejection fraction and persistent elevation of troponin associated with cardiac amyloidosis

Cardiac amyloidosis is an increasingly recognized cause of heart failure. It remains underdiagnosed despite a significant morbidity and mortality rate. The mean survival in patients with cardiac amyloidosis is less than 1 year in untreated primary light-chain amyloidosis and less than 4 years in wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis. We report a unique case of a 78-year-old male with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis, who presented with persistently elevated troponin and progressive heart failure unresponsive to conventional therapy. With this case, we would like to highlight the role of cardiac biomarkers in the early diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis.

Outcomes with early vs. deferred stem cell transplantation in light chain amyloidosis

In the presence of effective treatment options for systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is sometimes deferred after stem cell collection. We designed this retrospective study to compare overall survival (OS) between patients who proceed directly to ASCT after stem cell collection and those who defer ASCT. We included patients with AL amyloidosis who had stem cell collection at Mayo Clinic, Minnesota, from 2004 to 2018. ASCT was considered "early" if performed within 90 days of collection, and "deferred" if performed after 90 days, or not done by last follow up. We included 651 patients; 527 underwent early ASCT and 124 deferred ASCT. There was no difference in OS with early vs. deferred ASCT (median OS: 13.0 vs. 11.4 years, respectively, P = 0.28). There was no difference in OS between the 2 groups among patients with early or advanced Mayo Stage. Among patients who achieved ≥very good partial response at the time of collection, OS in the early and deferred groups was 14.2 and 13.4 years, respectively (P = 0.06). Survival outcomes are similar with early and deferred ASCT. Further studies are needed to identify patients who would benefit from each approach.

Conventional Therapy for Amyloid Light-Chain Amyloidosis

The vast majority of patients with light-chain (AL) amyloidosis are not eligible for stem cell transplant and are treated with conventional chemotherapy. Conventional regimens are based on various combinations of dexamethasone, alkylating agents, proteasome inhibitors, and immunomodulatory drugs. The choice of these regimens requires a careful risk stratification, based on the extent of amyloid organ involvement, comorbidities, and the characteristics of the amyloidogenic plasma cell clone. Most patients are treated upfront with bortezomib and dexamethasone combined with cyclophosphamide or melphalan. Cyclophosphamide does not compromise stem cell mobilization and harvest and is more manageable in renal failure. Melphalan can overcome the effect of t(11;14), which is associated with lower response rates and shorter survival in subjects treated with bortezomib and dexamethasone, or in combination with cyclophosphamide. Lenalidomide and pomalidomide are the mainstay of rescue treatment. They are effective in patients exposed to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and alkylators, but deep hematologic responses are rare. Ixazomib, alone or in combination with lenalidomide, increases the rate of complete responses in relapsed/refractory patients. Conventional chemotherapy regimens will represent the backbone for future combinations, particularly with anti-plasma-cell immunotherapy, that will further improve response rates and outcomes.

A validated composite organ and hematologic response model for early assessment of treatment outcomes in light chain amyloidosis

Newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients were evaluated to develop a model for early assessment of treatment benefit at 6 months, integrating both hematologic (HR) and organ response (OR) assessment (testing cohort, Mayo: n = 473; validation cohort, Pavia: n = 575). Multiple OR were assessed as follows: All OR (AOR): response in all organs, mixed OR (MOR): response in some organs, no OR (NOR)]. AOR rates at 6 months improved with deepening HR; complete response (CR; 38%, 35%), very good partial response (VGPR; 30%, 26%), and partial response (PR; 16%, 21%), respectively. A composite HR/OR (CHOR) model was developed using incremental scoring based on hazard ratios with scores of 0–3 for HR (0—CR, 1—VGPR, 2—PR, 3—no response) and 0–2 for OR (0—AOR, 1—MOR, 2—NOR). Patients could be divided into two distinct CHOR groups (scores 0–3 and 4–5), with median OS in group 1 and group 2: Not reached vs. 34 months, p < 0.001 [Mayo] and 87 vs. 23 months, p < 0.001 [Pavia]. In conclusion, we developed a model that can assess multiple organs concurrently, and integrate both HR and OR assessments to determine early clinical benefit with treatment, which may be used as a surrogate end-point in trials and to compare outcomes with different therapies.

High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in AL Amyloidosis

AL amyloidosis is a systemic amyloidosis and is associated with an underlying plasma cell dyscrasia. High-dose intravenous melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation was developed for the treatment of AL amyloidosis in the early 1990s and was prompted by its success in myeloma. This application has evolved significantly over the past three decades. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of eligibility criteria, stem cell collection, and mobilization strategies and regimens, risk-adapted melphalan dosing, role for induction and consolidation therapies as well as long-term outcome with respect to survival, hematologic response and relapse as well as organ responses following stem cell transplantation. Continued efforts to refine patient selection and management, and incorporate novel anti-plasma cell agents in combination or sequentially to further improve outcomes in AL amyloidosis are also discussed.

The prognostic value of right ventricular deformation derived from cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking for all-cause mortality in light-chain amyloidosis patients

Background

Early detection of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is vital for determining the prognosis of light-chain amyloidosis (AL) patients. While few studies focused on RV deformation due to the limitation of research methods. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of RV myocardial strain in AL patients assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) tissue tracking.

Methods

Sixty-four AL patients (28 females and 36 males, mean age 58±12.8 years old; range 25-81 years old) were enrolled from 1 October 2014 through 31 March 2017 and compared with 20 age- and sex-matched controls. Fifty-one AL patients met the criteria for cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Deformation parameters of both RV and left ventricle (LV) were measured by the CMR tissue tracking technique including myocardial global radial peak strain (GRPS), global circumferential peak strain (GCPS), and global longitudinal peak strain (GLPS). The follow-up time was 20 months or until the occurrence of death.

Results

Thirty-two (50%) had preserved RV ejection fraction (RVEF ≥45%). AL patients had significantly lower RV-GRPS (20.3±2.12 vs. 31.31±7.61), GCPS (-2.12±0.88 vs. -13.71±2.53), and GLPS (-5.33±0.64 vs. -14.239±2.99) than controls even RVEF remain preserved (all P<0.001). Compared with controls and patients without CA, RV-GRPS (12.26±1.26 vs. 29.72±3.54, P<0.001) and RV-GLPS (-3.78±2.25 vs. -5.66±2.08, P<0.05) were significantly lower in patients with CA. Cox multivariate analyses demonstrated that RV-GRPS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98, P=0.007] and Mayo stage were (HR =3.11, 95% CI: 1.30-7.41, P=0.01) predictors of mortality in AL patients.

Conclusions

CMR tissue tracking is a feasible and highly reproducible technique for the analysis of RV deformation and could aid in the early diagnosis of RV involvement in AL patients. RV-GRPS of RV strain and Mayo stage provides prognostic information about mortality in AL patients.

Introduction to clinical research based on modern epidemiology

Over the past 20 years, recent advances in science technologies have dramatically changed the styles of clinical research. Currently, it has become more popular to use recent modern epidemiological techniques, such as propensity score, instrumental variable, competing risks, marginal structural modeling, mixed effects modeling, bootstrapping, and missing data analyses, than before. These advanced techniques, also known as modern epidemiology, may be strong tools for performing good clinical research, especially in large-scale observational studies, along with relevant research questions, good databases, and the passion of researchers. However, to use these methods effectively, we need to understand the basic assumptions behind them. Here, I will briefly introduce the concepts of these techniques and their implementation. In addition, I would like to emphasize that various types of clinical studies, not only large database studies but also small studies on rare and intractable diseases, are equally important because clinicians always do their best to take care of many kinds of patients who suffer from various kidney diseases and this is our most important mission.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiac Amyloidosis Related to Plasma Cell Dyscrasias

Light chain amyloidosis is a deadly disease in which a monoclonal plasma cell dyscrasia produces misfolded immunoglobulin light chains (AL) that aggregate and form rigid amyloid fibrils. The amyloid deposits infiltrate one or more organs, leading to injury and severe dysfunction. The degree of cardiac involvement is a major driver of morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent irreversible end-organ damage and improve overall survival. Treatment of AL cardiac amyloidosis involves eliminating the underlying plasma cell dyscrasia with chemotherapy and pursuing supportive heart failure management.

A retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes in 45 patients with cardiac light-chain amyloidosis: a single-center experience in Japan

The prognosis of cardiac light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is considered to be very poor. We studied the treatment efficacy and outcomes by retrospectively analyzing the clinical results of 45 patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis treated at our hospital between September 2008 and March 2016. The group of patients analyzed included 29 males and 16 females with a median age of 68 years. Their baseline median NT-proBNP, cTnT, and dFLC were 3167 pg/ml, 0.080 ng/ml, and 286.17 mg/l, respectively. Twenty-eight patients were in Cardiac Stage (CS) III and 17 patients were in Revised Prognostic Stage (RPS) IV. At the median follow-up of 10 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 16 months and 3-year OS was 35.9%. The patients in CS III showed significantly poorer survival rate than those in CS I or II (3-year OS: 12.2% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.0115) and the patients in RPS IV showed significantly poorer survival rate than those in RPS I, II, or III (3-year OS: 11.0% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.000914). Regardless of the therapeutic approaches, patients who achieved hematological CR or cardiac organ response demonstrated significantly improved prognosis. Therefore, achievement of hematological and organ responses is important in the treatment of cardiac AL amyloidosis.

Efficacy of Chemotherapies and Stem Cell Transplantation for Systemic AL Amyloidosis: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The present Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy of different chemotherapies and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for studies compared the rates of hematological response (HR), complete response (CR), renal response, and cardiac response in AL amyloidosis patients.

RESULTS

There were three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and thirteen observational controlled trials (OCTs) comprising 3,402 participants enrolled for the comparisons of seven treatments: melphalan + dexamethasone (MDex), high-dose melphalan followed by ASCT, bortezomib + melphalan + dexamethasone (BMDex), thalidomide + cyclophosphamide + dexamethasone (CTD), bortezomib + dexamethasone (BDex), bortezomib + cyclophosphamide + dexamethasone (CyBorD), cyclophosphamide + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (CLD). BMDex was ranked first in the aspect of both HR and CR, CTD induced the highest rate of renal response, and BDex was possibly the best treatment for the cardiac response.

CONCLUSION

Although more data about safety and cost are needed, BMDex was recommended as the most efficient treatment for AL amyloidosis patients for enhancing the response rate for HR and CR.

Outcomes of autologous stem cell transplant for cardiac AL-amyloidosis and cardiac light chain deposition disease

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac amyloidosis and light chain deposition disease (LCDD) are the most common cause of death in AL amyloidosis or LCDD.

METHODS

Our multiple myeloma database identified 50 patients with cardiac amyloidosis or LCDD between January 2004 and January 2013. Descriptive analyses were performed on available data for patient characteristics, disease course, and outcomes.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 61 years for those who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT) and 71 years for those who received only bortezomib-based chemotherapy; 62.5% (n = 30) of patients had elevated levels of NT-proBNP ≥323 ng/L, and 29.2% (n = 14) of patients had an elevated cTnT ≥0.1 µg/L. Echocardiogram findings showed a speckled appearance in 18% (n = 9) of patients, and 60% (n = 30) of patients had an increased diastolic intra-ventricular septum (IVSD) thickness measuring ≥1.3 cm; 64.3% (n = 18) of patients who underwent cardiac MRI showed subendocardial enhancement. Out of 48 patients who received treatment, 37 patients were diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis and 11 patients were diagnosed with cardiac LCDD. Twenty-eight patients (75.7%) with cardiac amyloidosis received ASCT, compared to 34.3% (n = 9) patients who were ineligible for ASCT and received chemotherapy only. Patients who underwent ASCT had a median OS of 4.48 years compared to 1.82 years (p = 0.69) for those receiving chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Our single institution experience shows that ASCT is feasible for cardiac amyloidosis and/or cardiac LCDD. However, careful selection of proper patients and diligent supportive care are vital to decreasing transplant-related mortality.

New developments in diagnosis, risk assessment and management in systemic amyloidosis

Amyloidosis is a group of disorders characterized by a misfolded protein that deposits in organs and compromise their function. Clinician should have a high index of suspicion because in most cases, the clinical picture is non-specific. Typing of amyloid is of utmost importance and should be an integral part of accurately diagnosing a patient. AL amyloidosis is the most common systemic amyloidosis in the western world in which the misfolded proteins are immunoglobulin light chains secreted by clonal plasma cells. New data about prognostication of AL amyloidosis patients are accumulating. The treatment goal is to eradicate the amyloidogenic plasma cell clone, by using high dose melphalan and/or novel agents (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies against CD38). Early diagnosis is important for effectively treating the patient as late diagnosis hampers chances for organ recovery. ATTR amyloidosis is less recognized but is increasingly seen due to better recognition and improved diagnostic tools. New data about treatment options (patisiran, inotersen and tafamidis) have recently been published and are discussed.

An updated single center experience with plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for stem cell mobilization in light chain amyloidosis

The use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without chemotherapy to mobilize hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) can result in significant morbidity in light chain (AL) amyloidosis patients. Plerixafor, a strong inducer and mobilizer of HPCs, can be used as an adjunct to G-CSF to improve mobilization efficiency. We describe the outcomes for combined G-CSF/plerixafor mobilized patients with AL amyloidosis. We reviewed data of 53 consecutive AL amyloidosis patients who underwent combined G-CSF/plerixafor HPC mobilization between May 2011 and October 2017 at our institution. We evaluated patients for HPC collection efficiency, perimobilization toxicity and postautologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) outcomes. Median CD34⁺ cell collection was 12.4 × 10⁶  cells/kg (range 2.5 × 10⁶ to 34.1 × 10⁶  cells/kg) and 45 (85%) patients had collections of ≥5.0 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg. There were no mobilization failures or perimobilization mortality. During mobilization, 37 (70%) patients had weight gain (median 1.3 kg, range 0.1-4) but none >10% body weight, 5 (10%) patients had diarrhea, and one patient each had hypotension and cardiac arrhythmia. Among the 31 patients analyzed for CD34 collection efficiency (CE), the median CD34 CE was 47% (range 36-62). At 5 years follow-up 82% and 84% of patients were progression-free and alive, respectively. Our results suggest that G-CSF/plerixafor mobilization is safe, well tolerated, and effective in AL amyloidosis.

Impact of consolidation therapy post autologous stem cell transplant in patients with light chain amyloidosis

The role of consolidation post autologous stem cell transplant in light chain amyloidosis is not well defined. We retrospectively identified patients who had light chain amyloidosis and underwent autologous stem cell transplant at the Mayo Clinic. Consolidation was defined as any treatment given after the day 100 evaluation post-transplant to maintain or deepen the response. We identified 471 patients, of whom 72 (15%) received consolidation. Patients receiving consolidation had more advanced disease (Mayo 2012 stage ≥II in 67% vs 52%, P = .02), and had lower day 100 response rates (very good partial response or better: 35% vs 84%, P < .001). After consolidation, rates of very good partial response improved from 24% to 28%, and rates of complete response improved from 11% to 40%. Patients with less than very good partial response who received consolidation, had better progression-free survival (median of 22.4 vs 8.8 months, P < .001), and the benefit was greater in those who deepened their response (median of 41 vs 8.8 months, P < .001). In patients with less than very good partial response, there was a trend for better overall survival in patients who responded to consolidation (median of 125.8 vs 74.4 months, P = .07). In patients who achieved very good partial response, or better, at day 100 post autologous stem cell transplant, consolidation did not improve progression-free or overall survival. Consolidation after autologous stem cell transplant for light chain amyloidosis improves progression-free survival for patients who achieve less than very good partial response.

Regression of renal amyloid deposits by VAD therapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation in a patient with primary AL amyloidosis

We report a 58-year-old Japanese woman who presented with nephrotic syndrome. Steroid therapy and cyclosporine A administration were initiated, but hematological remission and renal response were not achieved. Renal biopsy revealed amyloid deposits in the mesangial region and the small arteries. Proteomic analysis based on laser microdissection and mass spectrometry showed that the amyloid deposits were composed of the constant region of the lambda light chain. She received vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone therapy followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation, resulting in hematological complete remission and renal response with negative urinary Bence-Jones protein and proteinuria. Renal biopsy was performed four times during follow-up, demonstrating that amyloid deposits decreased gradually, while glomeruli showing global sclerosis increased from 3 to 62%. This case suggests that glomerular amyloid deposits can be cleared via tissue remodeling, if stem cells producing amyloid precursors are completely replaced by unrelated cells after stem cell transplantation.

AL Amyloidosis for the Cardiologist and Oncologist: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management

AL amyloidosis results from clonal production of immunoglobulin light chains, most commonly arising from a clonal plasma cell disorder. Once considered a nearly uniformly fatal disease, prognosis has improved markedly over the past 15 years, predominantly because of advances in light chain suppressive therapies. Cardiac deposition of amyloid fibrils is common, and the severity of cardiac involvement remains the primary driver of prognosis. Improvements in chemotherapy/immunotherapy have prompted a reassessment of the role of advanced cardiac therapies previously considered contraindicated in most patients, including the role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac transplantation. This state-of-the-art review highlights the current state of the field, including diagnosis, prognosis, and hematologic- and cardiac-specific therapies.

Fifteen year overall survival rates after autologous stem cell transplantation for AL amyloidosis

In appropriately selected patients with AL amyloidosis, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is an established treatment modality with excellent outcomes and decreasing transplant related mortality (TRM) over time. We report on 15-year overall survival (OS) in 159 patients undergoing ASCT from 1996 to 2003, with median follow up of 17.1 years. Day 100 TRM was 13.2% (n = 21). The OS of ≥15 years was observed in 30% (47/159) of patients. Patients surviving ≥15 years were younger (53 vs 56 years, P = .02), less likely to have lambda as the involved light chain (62% vs 78%, P = .03) and were less likely to have heart involvement (32% vs 56%, P = .005). Median OS of patients with heart involvement vs not was 4.0 vs 11.1 years, P = .006 and actuarial 15-year OS was 23% vs 43%, respectively. A higher proportion of patients with OS ≥15 years received full-dose melphalan conditioning (81% vs 61%, P = .01), and achieved day 100 complete response (CR) (64% vs 24%, P < .001). Median OS amongst patients who achieved CR vs not was 19.3 vs 5.4 years, P < .001. Heart involvement, receiving full-dose melphalan and achieving CR remained independent predictors of OS. AL amyloidosis and related complications were the cause of death in 52% of patients overall (1-5 years post-transplant: 81%; 5-10 years: 62% and 10-15 years: 55%). These results reinforce the key role of ASCT in AL amyloidosis. With improvements in TRM and more options for relapsed disease, we expect the long-term survival post-transplant to improve significantly in the future.

Pilot Study of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Pre- and Post-Risk-Adapted Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in AL Amyloidosis

Treatment for AL amyloidosis aims to eradicate clonal plasma cells, thereby disrupting the amyloid deposition causing organ damage. Risk-adapted high-dose melphalan plus autologous stem cell transplantation (RA-ASCT) is an effective therapy. We conducted a prospective pilot analysis of a comprehensive approach using bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD) before and after RA-ASCT in 19 patients. BD induction (up to 3 cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² i.v. and dexamethasone 40 mg orally [p.o.] or i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) was followed by RA-ASCT and then BD consolidation (6 cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m²i.v. and dexamethasone 20 mg p.o. or i.v. weekly for 4 weeks, every 12 weeks). The overall hematologic response rate (partial response or better) was 95%, including 37% minimal residual disease negative [MRD(-)] complete response (CR) by flow cytometry (sensitivity up to 1/10⁶ cells). At 2 years, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50% to 93%) and 84% (95% CI, 69% to 99%), respectively, with median duration of follow-up in survivors of 61 months (range, 42 to 84 months). In a landmark analysis, patients achieving MRD(-) CR had superior PFS (P= .008). This approach is safe and yields deep and durable remissions promoting organ recovery. Each treatment phase deepened the response. Future aims include improving the efficacy and toxicity of each phase.

Treatment of AL amyloidosis

AL amyloidosis is caused by the conversion of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains into amyloid fibrillar aggregates that deposit in tissue and lead to organ dysfunction. Diagnosis is histological and relies primarily on non-invasive biopsies, showing Congo red-positive amorphous deposits containing immunoglobulin light chains, most commonly of lambda isotype. The clinical presentation is extremely polymorphous, due to the large number of organs that can be affected by the disease. The kidneys and the heart are most frequently involved organs, in about two thirds of patients each, responsible for nephrotic syndrome and restrictive cardiomyopathy. Treatment is based on chemotherapy aimed at eliminating the medullary clone producing the pathogenic monoclonal light chains. It is guided by risk assessment, based on the serum levels of cardiac biomarkers. Its effectiveness must be regularly assessed by the serum free light chain assay. Current reference regimens combine an alkylating agent, with high doses of dexamethasone and most often a proteasome inhibitor. They are effective in the majority of patients. The overall prognosis depends on the importance of the initial severity of organ involvement, particularly the heart, and is strongly influenced by the haematological response. The treatment must be rapidly modified in non-responders, especially in those with severe cardiac disease, with the introduction of immunomodulatory drugs and antibodies targeting plasma cells. However, effective therapies for patients with the more severe amyloid cardiopathy are an unmet need. Strategies directly accelerating the removal of amyloid deposits, despite disappointing preliminary results, could further improve the prognosis of this disease.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with AL amyloidosis with impaired renal function

We retrospectively reviewed the impact of impaired renal function (eGFR < 45 ml/min/SA) on post-transplant outcomes in patients receiving ASCT for AL amyloidosis. Patients were grouped into two cohorts, those with normal renal function (NRF) eGFR ≥ 45 ml/min (n = 568) and those with impaired renal function (IRF) eGFR < 45 ml/min (n = 87). Patients with IRF had higher renal stage (>Stage 1: 100% IRF vs 37% NRF, p < 0.0001) and the majority received conditioning with melphalan <200 mg/m² (70% IRF vs 21% NRF, p < 0.0001). Forty-four patients (6.7%) required dialysis within 100 days of ASCT. Renal stage predicted for dialysis institution within 100 days of ASCT (3% Stage I vs 10% Stage II vs 22% Stage III, p < 0.0001). Dialysis within 100 days was higher in the IRF cohort (16% for IRF cohort vs 6% for NRF cohort, p = 0.0007. Patients with impaired renal function were more likely to be admitted to hospital (80% IRF vs 70% NRF, p = 0.03). The 100-day mortality was higher in the IRF cohort (14% IRF cohort vs 5% NRF cohort, p = 0.008). Median OS and PFS were similar between the two cohorts. Impaired renal function predicts for a higher rate of hospitalization, progression to dialysis and early mortality in patients receiving ASCT for AL amyloidosis.

Indications for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe, 2019

This is the seventh special EBMT report on the indications for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders. Our aim is to provide general guidance on transplant indications according to prevailing clinical practice in EBMT countries and centres. In order to inform patient decisions, these recommendations must be considered together with the risk of the disease, the risk of the transplant procedure and the results of non-transplant strategies. In over two decades since the first report, the EBMT indications manuscripts have incorporated changes in transplant practice coming from scientific and technical developments in the field. In this same period, the establishment of JACIE accreditation has promoted high quality and led to improved outcomes of patient and donor care and laboratory performance in transplantation and cellular therapy. An updated report with operating definitions, revised indications and an additional set of data with overall survival at 1 year and non-relapse mortality at day 100 after transplant in the commonest standard-of-care indications is presented. Additional efforts are currently underway to enable EBMT member centres to benchmark their risk-adapted outcomes as part of the Registry upgrade Project 2020 against national and/or international outcome data.

High-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation in systemic AL amyloidosis in the era of novel anti-plasma cell therapy: a comprehensive review

The application of high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) to systemic AL amyloidosis (AL) has evolved over the past two decades and remains an important component of therapy for patients with AL. The era of novel agents created the opportunity to provide well -tolerated induction and post-SCT consolidation to AL patients eligible for SCT and the current availability of new monoclonal antibody therapies will likely provide additional opportunities to enhance the outcomes with SCT. In this review, we touch on the history of SCT for AL and examine the data on eligibility, mobilization, induction, risk-adapted melphalan dosing, engraftment, consolidation and maintenance, and long-term outcomes with SCT. We note that induction therapy may deprive some patients of the opportunity to proceed to SCT but is likely needed if the marrow plasmacytosis is > 10%, that risk-adapted melphalan dosing continues to be relevant, and that post-SCT consolidation improves the complete response rate as well as long-term overall survival. The importance of baseline cytogenetics is also highlighted, particularly for patients whose clonal plasma cells are ≤ 10% but harbor the t(11;14), because they may have improved survival with SCT.

Bortezomib-based induction followed by stem cell transplantation in light chain amyloidosis: results of the multicenter HOVON 104 trial

This prospective, multicenter, phase II study investigated the use of four cycles of bortezomib-dexamethasone induction treatment, followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with newly diagnosed light chain amyloidosis. The aim of the study was to improve the hematologic complete remission (CR) rate 6 months after SCT from 30% to 50%. Fifty patients were enrolled and 72% had two or more organs involved. The overall hematologic response rate after induction treatment was 80% including 20% CR and 38% very good partial remissions (VGPR). Fifteen patients did not proceed to SCT for various reasons but mostly treatment-related toxicity and disease-related organ damage and death (2 patients). Thirty-one patients received melphalan 200 mg/m² and four patients a reduced dose because of renal function impairment. There were no deaths related to the transplantation procedure. Hematologic responses improved at 6 months after SCT to 86% with 46% CR and 26% VGPR. However, due to the high treatment discontinuation rate before transplantation the primary endpoint of the study was not met and the CR rate in the intention-to-treat analysis was 32%. Organ responses continued to improve after SCT. We confirm the high efficacy of bortezomib-dexamethasone treatment in patients with AL amyloidosis. However, because of both treatment-related toxicity and disease characteristics, 30% of the patients could not proceed to SCT after induction treatment. (Trial registered at Dutch Trial Register identifier NTR3220).

Light chain type predicts organ involvement and survival in AL amyloidosis patients receiving stem cell transplantation

We evaluated the impact of light chain type, lambda (λ) or kappa (κ), on disease features and outcomes in patients with immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis receiving stem cell transplant at the Mayo Clinic between October 2002 and August 2016. Patients with λ AL amyloidosis had higher rates of renal and neurological involvement (λ 69% vs κ 57%, P = .02 and λ 16% vs κ 9%, P = .03, respectively). Patients with κ AL amyloidosis had more hepatic involvement (λ 7% vs κ 18%, P = .0003). Complete response rate was 43% for both groups and overall response rates were similar (λ 85% vs κ 91%, P = .12). Patients with κ light chain amyloidosis had better progression-free and overall survival (PFS: λ 74 months vs κ 101 months, P = .0064 and OS: λ 121 months vs κ not reached, P = .003). Mayo stage 2004 was more predictive of survival in the λ cohort (median OS of 143 months stage I vs 77 months stage II vs 33 months stage III, P < .0001) than in the κ cohort (median OS not reached for stage I and II and 102 months for stage III, P = .044). Conditioning dose predicted survival in the λ cohort only (median OS 149 months for melphalan 200 mg/m² vs 50 months for melphalan <200 mg/m², P < .0001; median OS κ not reached for melphalan 200 mg/m² or <200 mg/m², P = .38). On multivariate analysis, light chain type remained an independent predictor of survival. Light chain type predicts organ involvement and survival in patients with AL amyloidosis receiving stem cell transplant.

Cyclophosphamide + Thalidomide + Dexamethasone Versus Melphalan + Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Amyloid Light-chain Amyloidosis With Kidney Involvement: A Retrospective Study in Chinese Patients

PURPOSE

At present, a diverse array of treatment regimens are available for systemic amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. Both cyclophosphamide + thalidomide + dexamethasone (CTD) and melphalan + dexamethasone (MD) regimens have been recommended as first-line therapies, but no detailed comparative studies of the two have been performed. This study is the first to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the CTD and MD regimens in the treatment of AL amyloidosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from consecutive patients with AL amyloidosis who were treated with MD or CTD as the initial regimen between June 2012 and January 2018.

FINDINGS

In the final analysis, 38 patients received CTD, and 30 received MD. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, including age, sex, renal function, involved organs, level of free light chains, and Mayo Clinic amyloidosis prognostic staging. The overall hematologic response rates in the CTD and MD groups were 69.0% versus 68.0%, respectively (P = 0.94), including a complete response in 27.6% versus 8.0% (P = 0.14). Neither group reached the estimated median overall survival, and the difference between the 2 groups was not significant (P = 0.17). The median progression-free survival times were 36 versus 14 months (P = 0.24) in the CTD and MD groups, respectively. The CTD group achieved a numerically but not statistically higher prevalence of kidney response (52.9% vs 37.0%; P = 0.22). The most common adverse events in the 2 treatment groups were fatigue (48.5% vs 21.7%; P = 0.04) and constipation, anemia, nausea/vomiting, neutropenia, and syncope (all, P = NS). Deaths occurred in 6 patients in the CTD group and 9 patients in the MD group; none were considered by the investigators as related to the study treatments. There were no other serious adverse events observed in our study.

IMPLICATIONS

The CTD regimen may not be inferior to standard oral MD in terms of overall hematologic response and overall survival. Although this study was of retrospective and negative-control design with some additional limitations, it may provide a therapeutic option for use in developing countries where patients cannot afford bortezomib or melphalan.

Daratumumab for the treatment of AL amyloidosis

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been used as treatment for immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis for over two decades with improving outcomes; however, the majority of patients are not candidates for this therapy at diagnosis. Novel agents such as immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 have been adopted from the multiple myeloma spheres with encouraging results. Herein, we discuss the role of daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody to CD38, in the treatment of AL amyloidosis. We focus on its mechanism of action, tolerability, and the current published data on its use in AL amyloidosis. Early data from phase I and phase II studies show that daratumumab is tolerated well in this population and induces rapid and deep responses. Phase III trials are currently accruing and we envision daratumumab becoming a key component in the treatment of AL amyloidosis in the future.

What is the best first-line treatment for POEMS syndrome: autologous transplantation, melphalan and dexamethasone, or lenalidomide and dexamethasone?

POEMS syndrome is a rare plasma cell dyscrasia. This study compared the responses to and survival of 347 POEMS syndrome patients given three first-line treatment regimens: autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT, N = 165) and melphalan + dexamethasone (MDex, N = 79), or lenalidomide + dexamethasone (LDex, N = 103). After a median 45-month follow-up, overall hematologic complete remission (CR_H) was 46.4%, vascular endothelial growth factor complete remission (CR_V) was 55.1%, and neurological remission (R_N) was 93.8%. CR_H was better with ASCT (49.7%) than with MDex (37.7%, p = 0.001). CR_V was better with ASCT (66.2%) than with MDex (38.5%, p = 0.001) or LDex (47.7%, p = 0.008). Differences in R_N achieved by three regimens (91.5% vs. 100% vs. 93.8%, p = 0.234) were not significant. Overall 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 80.5% and overall 3-year overall survival (OS) was 90.8%. PFS was 87.6% with ASCT and 64.9% with LDex (p = 0.003). OS in the three regimens did not differ (p = 0.079). In medium-high risk patients, ASCT had better CR_H and CR_V than MDex, and better PFS than LDex. Therefore, although all three treatments had reasonable responses and survivals, patients with higher risk may benefit more from ASCT treatment.

Recent Advances in the Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Management of Systemic Light-Chain Amyloidosis

The term amyloidosis refers to a group of disorders in which protein fibrils accumulate in certain organs, disrupt their tissue architecture, and impair the function of the effected organ. The clinical manifestations and prognosis vary widely depending on the specific type of the affected protein. Immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is the most common form of systemic amyloidosis, characterized by deposition of a misfolded monoclonal light-chain that is secreted from a plasma cell clone. Demonstrating amyloid deposits in a tissue biopsy stained with Congo red is mandatory for the diagnosis. Novel agents (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, venetoclax) and autologous stem cell transplantation, used for eliminating the underlying plasma cell clone, have improved the outcome for low- and intermediate-risk patients, but the prognosis for high-risk patients is still grave. Randomized studies evaluating antibodies that target the amyloid deposits (PRONTO, VITAL) were recently stopped due to futility and currently there is an intensive search for novel treatment approaches to AL amyloidosis. Early diagnosis is of paramount importance for effective treatment and prognosis, due to the progressive nature of this disease.

Systemic immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis

Systemic immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis is a protein misfolding disease caused by the conversion of immunoglobulin light chains from their soluble functional states into highly organized amyloid fibrillar aggregates that lead to organ dysfunction. The disease is progressive and, accordingly, early diagnosis is vital to prevent irreversible organ damage, of which cardiac damage and renal damage predominate. The development of novel sensitive biomarkers and imaging technologies for the detection and quantification of organ involvement and damage is facilitating earlier diagnosis and improved evaluation of the efficacy of new and existing therapies. Treatment is guided by risk assessment, which is based on levels of cardiac biomarkers; close monitoring of clonal and organ responses guides duration of therapy and changes in regimen. Several new classes of drugs, such as proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs, along with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, have led to rapid and deep suppression of amyloid light chain production in the majority of patients. However, effective therapies for patients with advanced cardiac involvement are an unmet need. Passive immunotherapies targeting clonal plasma cells and directly accelerating removal of amyloid deposits promise to further improve the overall outlook of this increasingly treatable disease.

AL amyloidosis: advances in diagnostics and treatment

AL amyloidosis (light chain; previously also called primary amyloidosis) is a systemic disease characterized by an amyloid deposition process affecting many organs, and which still has unsatisfactory survival of patients. The monoclonal light chains kappa (κ) or lambda (λ) or their fragments form the fibrils that deposit and accumulate in different tissues. Renal involvement is very frequent in AL amyloidosis and can lead to the development of nephrotic syndrome followed by renal failure in some cases. AL amyloidosis ultimately leads to destruction of tissues and progressive disease. With recent advances in the treatment, the importance of an early diagnosis of amyloidosis and correct assessment of its type is high. Histologic confirmation is based on Congo red detection of amyloid deposits in tissues but AL amyloidosis must also be distinguished from other systemic forms of amyloidoses with renal involvement, such as AA amyloidosis, amyloidosis with heavy chain deposition, fibrinogen Aα or ALECT2 (leukocyte chemotactic factor 2) deposition. Immunofluorescence (IF) plays a key role here. IF on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue after protease digestion, immunohistochemistry or laser microdissection with mass spectrometry should complete the diagnosis in unclear cases. Standard treatment with melphalan and prednisolone or with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone has been replaced with newer drugs used for the treatment of multiple myeloma—bortezomib, carfilzomib and ixazomib or thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide. High-dose melphalan supported by autologous stem cell transplantation remains the therapeutic option for patients with low-risk status. These new treatment options prolong survival from months to years and improve the prognosis in a majority of patients.

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: 2018 Update on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis is a clonal, nonproliferative plasma cell disorder in which fragments of immunoglobulin light or heavy chain are deposited in tissues. Clinical features depend on organs involved but can include restrictive cardiomyopathy, nephrotic syndrome, hepatic dysfunction, peripheral/autonomic neuropathy, and "atypical multiple myeloma."

DIAGNOSIS

Tissue biopsy stained with Congo red demonstrating amyloid deposits with apple-green birefringence is required for diagnosis. Invasive organ biopsy is not required because amyloid deposits can be found in bone marrow, salivary gland, or subcutaneous fat aspirate in 85% of patients. Verification that amyloid is composed of immunoglobulin light chains is mandatory. The gold standard is laser capture mass spectroscopy.

PROGNOSIS

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), serum troponin T, and difference between involved and uninvolved immunoglobulin free light chain values are used to classify patients into four groups of similar size; median survivals are 94.1, 40.3, 14.0, and 5.8 months.

THERAPY

All patients with a systemic amyloid syndrome require therapy to prevent deposition of amyloid in other organs and prevent progressive organ failure. Stem cell transplant (SCT) is preferred, but only 20% of patients are eligible. Requirements for safe SCT include systolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg, troponin T < 0.06 ng/mL, age < 70 years, and serum creatinine ≤1.7 mg/dL. Nontransplant candidates can be offered melphalan-dexamethasone or cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone. Daratumumab appears to be highly active in AL amyloidosis. Antibodies designed to dissolve existing amyloid deposits are under study.

FUTURE CHALLENGES

Delayed diagnosis remains a major obstacle to initiating effective therapy.

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

Upon completion of this educational activity, participants will be better able to: Master recognition of clinical presentations that should raise suspicion of amyloidosis. Understand simple techniques for confirming the diagnosis and providing material to classify the protein subunit. Recognize that a tissue diagnosis of amyloidosis does not indicate whether the amyloid is systemic or of immunoglobulin light chain origin. Understand the roles of the newly introduced chemotherapeutic and investigational antibody regimens for the therapy of light chain amyloidosis.

Recent advances in understanding and treating immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis

Immunoglobulin (Ig) light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a clonal plasma cell disorder characterized by misfolded Ig light chain deposition in vital organs of the body, resulting in proteotoxicity and organ dysfunction. Owing to its diverse clinical presentations and a tendency to mimic common medical conditions, AL amyloidosis is often diagnosed late and results in dismal outcomes. Early referral to a specialized center with expertise in management of AL amyloidosis is always recommended. The availability of sensitive biomarkers and novel therapies is reforming our approach to how we manage AL amyloidosis. Treatment for patients with AL amyloidosis should be risk-adapted and customized on the basis of individual patient characteristics. In the future, approaches directed at amyloid fibril clearance in combination with agents that target plasma cells will be needed both to eradicate the malignant clone and to establish organ responses.

[Oral melphalan plus high-dose dexamethasone as first-line therapy for patients with primary light chain amyloidosis]

Objective: To evaluate the response of oral melphalan plus high-dose dexamethasone (MDex) for patients with primary light chain amyloidosis (pAL). Methods: Clinical data, hematological and organ responses, and survival of 76 patients with pAL who had received MDex from January 2009 to July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Of 76 patients (47 males and 29 females with the median age of 56 [range, 20-74] years old), 19.70% patients were defined as Mayo 2004 stage 3, involvement of more than or two organs was presented in 65 (85.53%) patients. Among 60 response evaluable patients, overall hematological response was 48.33% with complete response of 20.00% and very good partial response of 20.00%, respectively. The median time to the hematological response was 5 (range, 1-15) months. 36.67% patients achieved organ response. After the median follow up of 23(range, 1-113) months for surviving patients, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 34 and 43 months, respectively. In a three months landmark analysis, the median rates of PFS and OS were 46 and 65 months, respectively. The median OS rates of patients with Mayo 2004 stage 3 and non Mayo 2004 stage 3 were 5 and 65 months (P=0.001), respectively. Conclusions: MDex was an effective treatment for patients with early stage pAL, but was not suitable for those with severe cardiac involvement.