A previously uncharacterized role for small protein B (SmpB) in transfer messenger RNA-mediated trans-translation

Studying tmRNA-mediated surveillance and nonstop mRNA decay

In bacteria, ribosomes stalled at the 3'-end of nonstop or defective mRNAs are rescued by the action of a specialized ribonucleoprotein complex composed of tmRNA and SmpB protein in a process known as trans-translation; for recent reviews see Dulebohn et al. [2007], Keiler [2007], and Moore and Sauer [2007]. tmRNA is a bifunctional RNA that acts as both a tRNA and an mRNA. SmpB-bound tmRNA is charged with alanine by alanyl-tRNA synthetase and recognized by EF-Tu (GTP). The quaternary complex of tmRNA-SmpB-EF-Tu and GTP recognizes stalled ribosomes and transfers the nascent polypeptide to the tRNA-like domain of tmRNA. A specialized reading frame within tmRNA is then engaged as a surrogate mRNA to append a 10 amino acid (ANDENYALAA) tag to the C-terminus of the nascent polypeptide. A stop codon at the end of the tmRNA reading frame then facilitates normal termination and recycling of the translation machinery. Through this surveillance mechanism, stalled ribosomes are rescued, and nascent polypeptides bearing the C-terminal tmRNA-tag are directed for proteolysis. Several proteases (ClpXP, ClpAP, Lon, FtsH, and Tsp) are known to be involved in the degradation of tmRNA-tagged proteins (Choy et al., 2007; Farrell et al., 2005; Gottesman et al., 1998; Herman et al., 1998, 2003; Keiler et al., 1996). In addition to its ribosome rescue and peptide tagging activities, trans-translation also facilitates the selective decay of nonstop mRNAs in a process that is dependent on the activities of SmpB protein, tmRNA, and the 3' to 5'-exonuclease, RNase R (Mehta et al., 2006; Richards et al., 2006; Yamamoto et al., 2003). Here, we describe methods and strategies for the purification of tmRNA, SmpB, Lon, and RNase R from Escherichia coli that are likely to be applicable to other bacterial species. Protocols for the purification of the Clp proteases, Tsp, and FtsH, as well as EF-Tu and other essential E. coli translation factors may be found elsewhere (Joshi et al., 2003; Kihara et al., 1996; Makino et al., 1999; Maurizi et al., 1990; Shotland et al., 2000). In addition, we present biochemical and genetic assays to study the various aspects of the trans-translation mechanism.

Functional SmpB-ribosome interactions require tmRNA

Small protein B (SmpB) is a requisite component of the transfer messenger RNA (tmRNA)-mediated bacterial translational quality control system known as trans-translation. The initial binding of tmRNA and its subsequent accommodation into the ribosomal A-site are activities intimately linked to SmpB protein function. From a mechanistic perspective, two key unanswered questions that require further investigation are: 1) what constitutes a stalled ribosome recognition complex and 2) does SmpB pre-bind ribosomes to recruit tmRNA. We have assessed, both in vivo and in vitro, the nature and stability of free SmpB interactions with stalled ribosomes and examined whether these interactions are functionally relevant. We present evidence to demonstrate that interaction of free SmpB with ribosomes is salt sensitive and significantly more labile than interaction of the SmpB.tmRNA complex with ribosomes. Upon dissociation of 70 S ribosomes SmpB partitions primarily with tmRNA rather than ribosomal subunits. This finding is consistent with biochemical and structural data demonstrating that tmRNA is the high-affinity binding partner of SmpB. Moreover, we show that under normal physiological conditions roughly similar numbers of SmpB and tmRNA molecules are present in cells. Our investigations also reveal that upon induction of a nonstop mRNA, SmpB is enriched in stalled ribosome fractions only in the presence of tmRNA. Based on these findings, we conclude that SmpB does not pre-bind stalled ribosome and that functional SmpB-stalled ribosome interactions require tmRNA. We propose that a 1:1:1 complex of SmpB.tmRNA.EF-Tu(GTP) recognizes and binds a stalled ribosome to initiate trans-translation.

Interaction of SmpB with ribosome from directed hydroxyl radical probing

To add a tag-peptide for degradation to the nascent polypeptide in a stalled ribosome, an unusual translation called trans-translation is facilitated by transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) having an upper half of the tRNA structure and the sequence encoding the tag-peptide except the first alanine. During this event, tmRNA enters the vacant A-site of the stalled ribosome without a codon-anticodon interaction, but with a protein factor SmpB. Here, we studied the sites and modes of binding of SmpB to the ribosome by directed hydroxyl radical probing from Fe(II) tethered to SmpB variants. It revealed two SmpB-binding sites, A-site and P-site, on the ribosome. Each SmpB can be superimposed on the lower half of tRNA behaving in translation. The sites of cleavages from Fe(II) tethered to the C-terminal residues of A-site SmpB are aligned along the mRNA path towards the downstream tunnel, while those of P-site SmpB are found almost exclusively around the region of the codon-anticodon interaction in the P-site. We propose a new model of trans-translation in that the C-terminal tail of SmpB initially recognizes the decoding region and the mRNA path free of mRNA by mimicking mRNA.

A functional interaction of SmpB with tmRNA for determination of the resuming point of trans-translation

In trans-translation, transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), possessing a dual function as a tRNA and an mRNA, relieves a stalled translation on the ribosome with the help of SmpB. Here, we established an in vitro system using Escherichia coli translation and trans-translation factors to evaluate two steps of trans-translation, peptidyl transfer from peptidyl-tRNA to alanyl-tmRNA and translation of the resume codon on tmRNA. Using this system, the effects of several mutations upstream of the tag-encoding region on tmRNA were examined. These mutations affected translation of the resume codon rather than peptidyl transfer, and one of them, A84U/U85G, caused a shift of the resume codon by -1. We also found that U(85) is protected from chemical modification by SmpB. In the A84U/U85G mutant, the base of protection was shifted from 85 to 84. Another mutation, A86U, which caused a shift of the resume codon by +1, shifted the base of protection from 85 to 86. The protection at 85 was suppressed by a mutation in the tRNA-like domain critical to SmpB binding. These results suggest that SmpB serves to bridge two separate domains of tmRNA to determine the initial codon for tag-translation. A mutant SmpB with a truncation of the unstructured C-terminal tail failed to promote peptidyl transfer, although it still protected U(85) from chemical modification.

The tmRNA system for translational surveillance and ribosome rescue

The tmRNA system performs translational surveillance and ribosome rescue in all eubacteria and some eukaryotic organelles. This system intervenes when ribosomes read to the 3' end of an mRNA or pause at internal codons with subsequent mRNA cleavage. A complex of alanyl-tmRNA (which functions as a tRNA and mRNA), SmpB protein, and EF-TucGTP binds stalled ribosomes, the nascent polypeptide is transferred to the alanine on tmRNA, and translation switches from the original message to a short tmRNA open reading frame (ORF) that encodes a degradation tag. Translation of the ORF and normal termination releases the tagged polypeptide for degradation and permits disassembly and recycling of ribosomal subunits for new rounds of protein synthesis. Structural and biochemical studies suggest mechanisms that keep tmRNA from interrupting normal translation and target ribosomes stalled with very short 3' mRNA extensions. Additional biological roles of tmRNA include stress management and the regulation of transcriptional circuits.

RNase R degrades non-stop mRNAs selectively in an SmpB-tmRNA-dependent manner

The SmpB-tmRNA-mediated trans-translation system has two well-established activities: rescuing ribosomes stalled on aberrant mRNAs and marking the associated protein fragments for proteolysis. Although the causative non-stop mRNAs are known to be degraded, little is known about the enabling mechanism or the RNases involved in their disposal. We report that Escherichia coli has an enabling mechanism that requires RNase R activity and is dependent on the presence of SmpB protein and tmRNA, suggesting a requirement for active transtranslation in facilitating RNase R engagement and promoting non-stop mRNA decay. Interestingly, this selective transcript degradation by RNase R targets aberrant (non-stop and multiple-rare-codon containing) mRNAs and does not affect the decay of related messages containing in-frame stop codons. Most surprisingly, RNase II and PNPase do not play a significant role in tmRNA-facilitated disposal of aberrant mRNAs. These findings demonstrate that RNase R is a crucial component of the trans-translation-mediated non-stop mRNA decay process, thus providing a requisite activity well suited to complement the ribosome rescue and protein tagging functions of this unique quality control system.

Lon protease degrades transfer-messenger RNA-tagged proteins

Bacterial trans translation is activated when translating ribosomes are unable to elongate or terminate properly. Small protein B (SmpB) and transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) are the two known factors required for and dedicated to trans translation. tmRNA, encoded by the ssrA gene, is a bifunctional molecule that acts both as a tRNA and as an mRNA during trans translation. The functions of tmRNA ensure that stalled ribosomes are rescued, the causative defective mRNAs are degraded, and the incomplete polypeptides are marked for targeted proteolysis. We present in vivo and in vitro evidence that demonstrates a direct role for the Lon ATP-dependent protease in the degradation of tmRNA-tagged proteins. In an endogenous protein tagging assay, lon mutants accumulated excessive levels of tmRNA-tagged proteins. In a reporter protein tagging assay with lambda-CI-N, the protein product of a nonstop mRNA construct designed to activate trans translation, lon mutant cells efficiently tagged the reporter protein, but the tagged protein exhibited increased stability. Similarly, a green fluorescent protein (GFP) construct containing a hard-coded C-terminal tmRNA tag (GFP-SsrA) exhibited increased stability in lon mutant cells. Most significantly, highly purified Lon preferentially degraded the tmRNA-tagged forms of proteins compared to the untagged forms. Based on these results, we conclude that Lon protease participates directly in the degradation of tmRNA-tagged proteins.

Structural basis for functional mimicry of long-variable-arm tRNA by transfer-messenger RNA

tmRNA and small protein B (SmpB) are essential trans-translation system components. In the present study, we determined the crystal structure of SmpB in complex with the entire tRNA domain of the tmRNA from Thermus thermophilus. Overall, the ribonucleoprotein complex (tRNP) mimics a long-variable-arm tRNA (class II tRNA) in the canonical L-shaped tertiary structure. The tmRNA terminus corresponds to the acceptor and T arms, or the upper part, of tRNA. On the other hand, the SmpB protein simulates the lower part, the anticodon and D stems, of tRNA. Intriguingly, several amino acid residues collaborate with tmRNA bases to reproduce the canonical tRNA core layers. The linker helix of tmRNA had been considered to correspond to the anticodon stem, but the complex structure unambiguously shows that it corresponds to the tRNA variable arm. The tmRNA linker helix, as well as the long variable arm of class II tRNA, may occupy the gap between the large and small ribosomal subunits. This suggested how the tRNA domain is connected to the mRNA domain entering the mRNA channel. A loop of SmpB in the tRNP is likely to participate in the interaction with alanyl-tRNA synthetase, which may be the mechanism for the promotion of tmRNA alanylation by the SmpB protein. Therefore, the tRNP may simulate a tRNA, both structurally and functionally, with respect to aminoacylation and ribosome entry.

Structure probing of tmRNA in distinct stages of trans-translation

Ribosomes stalled on problematic mRNAs in bacterial cells can be rescued by transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), its helper protein (small protein B, SmpB), and elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) through a mechanism called trans-translation. In this work we used lead(II) footprinting to probe the interactions of tmRNA with SmpB and other components of the translation machinery at different steps of the trans-translation cycle. Ribosomes with a short nascent peptide stalled on a truncated mRNA were reacted with Ala-tmRNA*EF-Tu*GTP, SmpB, and other translation components to initiate and execute trans-translation. Free tmRNA was probed with lead(II) acetate with and without SmpB, and ribosome bound tmRNA was probed in one of four different trans-translation states stabilized by antibiotic addition or selective exclusion of translation components. For comparison, we also analyzed lead(II) cleavage patterns of tmRNA in vivo in a wild-type as well as in an SmpB-deficient Escherichia coli strain. We observed some specific cleavages/protections in tmRNA for the individual steps of trans-translation, but the overall tmRNA conformation appeared to be similar in the stages analyzed. Our findings suggest that, in vivo, a dominant fraction of tmRNA is in complex with SmpB and that, in vitro, SmpB remains tmRNA bound at the initial steps of trans-translation.

Physiology of tmRNA: what gets tagged and why?

Transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) enters stalled translational complexes and, with small protein B (SmpB), mediates peptide tagging of the nascent protein and release of the stalled ribosome. Recent studies clarify how the tmRNA system is targeted to ribosomes and suggest that tmRNA-tagging is used for both quality control and specific regulation of cellular physiology.

The SsrA-SmpB ribosome rescue system is important for growth of Bacillus subtilis at low and high temperatures

Bacillus subtilis has multiple stress response systems whose integrated action promotes growth and survival under unfavorable conditions. Here we address the function and transcriptional organization of a five-gene cluster containing ssrA, previously known to be important for growth at high temperature because of the role of its tmRNA product in rescuing stalled ribosomes. Reverse transcription-PCR experiments detected a single message for the secG-yvaK-rnr-smpB-ssrA cluster, suggesting that it constitutes an operon. However, rapid amplification of cDNA ends-PCR and lacZ fusion experiments indicated that operon transcription is complex, with at least five promoters controlling different segments of the cluster. One sigma(A)-like promoter preceded secG (P(1)), and internal sigma(A)-like promoters were found in both the rnr-smpB (P(2)) and smpB-ssrA intervals (P(3) and P(HS)). Another internal promoter lay in the secG-yvaK intercistronic region, and this activity (P(B)) was dependent on the general stress factor sigma(B). Null mutations in the four genes downstream from P(B) were tested for their effects on growth. Loss of yvaK (carboxylesterase E) or rnr (RNase R) caused no obvious phenotype. By contrast, smpB was required for growth at high temperature (52 degrees C), as anticipated if its product (a small ribosomal binding protein) is essential for tmRNA (ssrA) function. Notably, smpB and ssrA were also required for growth at low temperature (16 degrees C), a phenotype not previously associated with tmRNA activity. These results extend the known high-temperature role of ssrA and indicate that the ribosome rescue system is important at both extremes of the B. subtilis temperature range.

tmRNA determinants required for facilitating nonstop mRNA decay

In bacteria, ribosomes stalled on nonstop mRNAs are rescued by tmRNA in a unique process called trans-translation. The two known tmRNA functions in trans-translation are (1) a tRNA-like function, which transfers the partially synthesized protein fragment to itself; and (2) an mRNA-like function, which enables ribosomes to resume and terminate translation on tmRNA as a surrogate template. We present evidence to demonstrate that tmRNA performs a third function, namely, facilitating the degradation of the causative defective mRNA. Our investigations have revealed the identity of key sequence determinants that promote the degradation of the nonstop mRNA. These sequence determinants are located in the distal part of the tmRNA open reading frame, encoding the ultimate, penultimate, and anti-penultimate amino acids of the peptide tag. We show that mutation of these tmRNA sequence elements has an adverse affect on the disposal of the nonstop mRNA, while leaving the tRNA and mRNA functions entirely unaffected. More significantly, specific mutations that change the nucleotide sequence of the peptide-reading frame without altering the nature or identity of the encoded amino acids still exhibit the characteristic defect in nonstop mRNA decay. In contrast, mutations in codons 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the tmRNA open reading frame do not have an adverse affect on degradation of defective mRNAs. Based on these results, we propose that tmRNA plays an important role in promoting the decay of nonstop mRNAs and that sequence elements in the distal segment of the peptide-reading frame make sequence-specific contributions that are crucial for this activity.

Role of conserved surface amino acids in binding of SmpB protein to SsrA RNA

Bacteria possess a unique salvage mechanism for rescuing ribosomes stalled on aberrant mRNAs. A complex of SmpB protein and SsrA RNA orchestrates this salvage process. The specific and direct binding of SmpB facilitates recognition and delivery of SsrA RNA to stalled ribosomes. The SmpB protein is conserved throughout the bacterial kingdom and contains several conserved amino acid sequence motifs. We present evidence to demonstrate that amino acid residues Glu-31, Leu-91, and Lys-124, which are highly conserved and clustered along an exposed surface of the protein, play a crucial role in the SsrA-mediated peptide tagging process. Our analysis suggests that the peptide-tagging defect exhibited by these SmpB variants is due to their inability to facilitate the delivery of SsrA RNA to stalled ribosomes. Moreover, we present evidence to demonstrate that the ribosome association defect of these variants is due to their reduced SsrA binding affinity. Consistent with these findings, we present biochemical evidence to demonstrate that residues Glu-31, Leu-91, and Lys-124 are essential for the SsrA binding activity of SmpB protein. Furthermore, we have investigated the interactions of SmpB.SsrA orthologues from the thermophilic bacterium Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis. Our investigations demonstrate an analogous role for the equivalent T. tengcongensis residues in SmpB.SsrA interactions, hence further validating our findings for the Escherichia coli SmpB.SsrA system. These results demonstrate the functional significance of this cluster of conserved residues in SmpB binding to SsrA RNA, suggesting they might represent a core contact surface for recognition of SsrA RNA.

Small protein B interacts with the large and the small subunits of a stalled ribosome during trans-translation

During trans-translation, stalled bacterial ribosomes are rescued by small protein B (SmpB) and by transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA). Stalled ribosomes switch translation from the defective messages to a short internal reading frame on tmRNA that tags the nascent peptide chain for degradation and recycles the ribosomes. We present evidences that SmpB binds the large and small ribosomal subunits in vivo and in vitro. The binding between SmpB and the ribosomal subunits is very tight, with a dissociation constant of 1.7 × 10⁻¹⁰ M, similar to its K_D for the 70S ribosome or for tmRNA. tmRNA displaces SmpB from its 50S binding but not from the 30S. In vivo, SmpB is detected on the 50S when trans-translation is impaired by lacking tmRNA or a functional SmpB. SmpB contacts the large subunit transiently and early during the trans-translational process. The affinity of SmpB for the two ribosomal subunits is modulated by tmRNA in the course of trans-translation. It is the first example of two copies of the same protein interacting with two different functional sites of the ribosomes.

SmpB triggers GTP hydrolysis of elongation factor Tu on ribosomes by compensating for the lack of codon-anticodon interaction during trans-translation initiation

Bacterial tmRNA rescues ribosomes that stall because of defective mRNAs via the trans-translation process. Although entry of the charged transfer messenger RNA (tmRNA) into the ribosome proceeded in the absence of elongation factor (EF-Tu) and in the presence of EF-Tu and the antibiotic kirromycin, evidence was found for the involvement of EF-Tu in trans-translation initiation. The polyalanine synthesis system attained by using a tmRNA variant consisting of only the tRNA-like domain revealed that it was completely dependent on the presence of SmpB and greatly enhanced by EF-Tu and EF-G. Actually, ribosome-dependent GTPase activity of EF-Tu was stimulated by the addition of SmpB and tmRNA but independently of template mRNA, demonstrating that SmpB compensates for the lack of codon-anticodon interaction during the first step of the trans-translation initiation. Based on these results, we suggest that SmpB structurally mimics the anticodon arm of tRNA and elicits GTP hydrolysis of EF-Tu upon tmRNA accommodation in the A site of the ribosome.

Cell cycle-regulated degradation of tmRNA is controlled by RNase R and SmpB

The production and removal of regulatory RNAs must be controlled to ensure proper physiological responses. SsrA RNA (tmRNA), a regulatory RNA conserved in all bacteria, is cell cycle regulated and is important for control of cell cycle progression in Caulobacter crescentus. We report that RNase R, a highly conserved 3' to 5' exoribonuclease, is required for the selective degradation of SsrA RNA in stalked cells. Purified RNase R degrades SsrA RNA in vitro, and is kinetically competent to account for all SsrA RNA turnover. SmpB, a tmRNA-binding protein, protects SsrA RNA from RNase R degradation in vitro, and the levels of SmpB protein during the cell cycle correlate with SsrA RNA stability. These results suggest that SmpB binding controls the timing of SsrA RNA degradation by RNase R. We propose a model for the regulated degradation of SsrA RNA in which RNase R degrades SsrA RNA from a non-tRNA-like 3' end, and SmpB specifically protects SsrA RNA from RNase R. This model explains the regulation of SsrA RNA in other bacteria, and suggests that a highly conserved regulatory mechanism controls SsrA activity.