Heat shock increases the association of binding protein-1 with initiation factor 4E

Striking multiplicity of eIF4E-BP1 phosphorylated isoforms identified by 2D gel electrophoresis regulation by heat shock

Eukaryotic initiation factor eIF4E-binding protein 1 (eIF4E-BP1), or PHAS-I, is multiply phosphorylated by insulin-stimulated protein kinase(s). Estimates for the number of phosphorylation sites range from two to greater than eight. IEF/SDS/PAGE can precisely differentiate protein isoforms based on their differences in charge (phosphorylation) and molecular mass. In this study, the diversity of eIF4E-BP1 isoforms was determined using IEF/SDS/PAGE/immunoblotting of unfractionated cell lysates. To investigate the molecular regulation of phosphorylation, alterations in eIF4E-BP1 in response to heat shock in HeLa cells were determined. In exponentially growing cells, 8-10 prominent eIF4E-BP1 isoforms were detected. Following heat shock, a rapid, temperature-dependent dephosphorylation of eIF4E-BP1 occurs roughly concurrent with protein synthesis inhibition; during recovery from heat shock rephosphorylation of eIF4E-BP1 parallels restoration of protein synthesis. However, eIF4E-BP1 and eIF4E kinases remain highly active during heat shock, as okadaic acid treatment restores phosphorylation of both factors in heat shocked cells. eIF4E-BP1 dephosphorylation is associated with eIF4E dissociation from large molecular mass complexes and increased binding to eIF4E-BP1. The amount of eIF4E-BP1 converted to the dephosphorylated state is sufficient to titrate all the eIF4E present. eIF4E-BP1 phosphorylation changes regulated by heat shock also occur in Drosophila. Of the 10 isoforms of eIF4E-BP1 resolved by IEF/SDS/PAGE, at least seven are labelled with [32P] and all 10 are recognized by (eIF4E-BP1)-specific antibodies. These results identify a complex set of eIF4E-BP1 phosphorylation isoforms; changes in the expression of these isoforms in response to stresses such as heat shock may contribute to translation repression.

Cell cycle progression and proliferation despite 4BP-1 dephosphorylation

Proliferation and cell cycle progression in response to growth factors require de novo protein synthesis. It has been proposed that binding of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF-4E) to the inhibitory protein 4BP-1 blocks translation by preventing access of eIF-4G to the 5' cap of the mRNA. The signal for translation initiation is thought to involve phosphorylation of 4BP-1, which causes it to dissociate from eIF-4E and allows eIF-4G to localize to the 5' cap. It has been suggested that the ability of the macrolide antibiotic rapamycin to inhibit 4BP-1 phosphorylation is responsible for the potent antiproliferative property of this drug. We now show that rapamycin-resistant cells exhibited normal proliferation despite dephosphorylation of 4BP-1 that allows it to bind to eIF-4E. Moreover, despite rapamycin-induced dephosphorylation of 4BP-1, eIF-4E-eIF-4G complexes (eIF-4F) were still detected. In contrast, amino acid withdrawal, which caused a similar degree of 4BP-1 dephosphorylation, resulted in dissociation of the eIF-4E-eIF-4G complex. Thus, 4BP-1 dephosphorylation is not equivalent to eIF-4E inactivation and does not explain the antiproliferative property of rapamycin.

Hypoxia increases the association of 4E-binding protein 1 with the initiation factor 4E in isolated rat hepatocytes

Incubation of hepatocytes under hypoxia increases binding of translation initiation factor eIF-4E to its inhibitory regulator 4E-BP1, and this correlates with dephosphorylation of 4E-BP1. Rapamycin induced the same effect in aerobic cells but no additive effect was observed when hypoxic cells were treated with rapamycin. This enhanced association of 4E-BP1 with eIF-4E might be mediated by mTOR. Nevertheless, only hypoxia produces a rapid inhibition of protein synthesis. Although hypoxia might be signalling via the rapamycin-sensitive pathway by changing eIF-4E availability, such a pathway is unlikely to be responsible for the depression in overall protein synthesis under hypoxia.

eIF4E activity is regulated at multiple levels

A key regulatory step in translation is initiation, or the recruitment of the translational machinery to the 5' end of mRNA. The 5' terminus of most mRNAs is demarcated by a m7GpppN cap (where m is a methyl group, and N is any nucleotide). The m7 cap is essential for the translation of most mRNAs, as it directs the translational machinery to the 5' end of the mRNA via its interaction with the cap binding protein, the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E). eIF4E is the limiting initiation factor in most cells. Thus, eIF4E activity plays a principal role in determining global translation rates. Consistent with this role, eIF4E is required for cell cycle progression, exhibits anti-apoptotic activity, and, when overexpressed, transforms cells. This review focuses upon the various mechanisms utilized in the regulation of eIF4E activity. (1) eIF4E is regulated transcriptionally; it is one of the few identified transcriptional targets of c-myc. (2) eIF4E is phosphorylated following activation of the MNK1 kinase, a substrate of the ERK and p38 MAPKs. The recent determination of the three-dimensional structure of eIF4E bound to a m7 cap analog has provided insight into the mechanisms involved in the regulation of the eIF4E-cap and eIF4E-mRNA interactions. As suggested by the crystal structure, phosphorylation of eIF4E may enhance its affinity for mRNA. (3) eIF4E is also regulated through binding to a family of translational repressor proteins. Interaction with the 4E-BPs prevents the incorporation of eIF4E into an active translation initiation complex, and thus, inhibits cap-dependent translation. This inhibitory interaction is relieved following phosphorylation of the 4E-BPs by a PI3K-dependent pathway, involving signalling by the anti-apoptotic kinase Akt/PKB, as well as FRAP/mTOR.

Posttranscriptional control of gene expression in yeast

Studies of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have greatly advanced our understanding of the posttranscriptional steps of eukaryotic gene expression. Given the wide range of experimental tools applicable to S. cerevisiae and the recent determination of its complete genomic sequence, many of the key challenges of the posttranscriptional control field can be tackled particularly effectively by using this organism. This article reviews the current knowledge of the cellular components and mechanisms related to translation and mRNA decay, with the emphasis on the molecular basis for rate control and gene regulation. Recent progress in characterizing translation factors and their protein-protein and RNA-protein interactions has been rapid. Against the background of a growing body of structural information, the review discusses the thermodynamic and kinetic principles that govern the translation process. As in prokaryotic systems, translational initiation is a key point of control. Modulation of the activities of translational initiation factors imposes global regulation in the cell, while structural features of particular 5' untranslated regions, such as upstream open reading frames and effector binding sites, allow for gene-specific regulation. Recent data have revealed many new details of the molecular mechanisms involved while providing insight into the functional overlaps and molecular networking that are apparently a key feature of evolving cellular systems. An overall picture of the mechanisms governing mRNA decay has only very recently begun to develop. The latest work has revealed new information about the mRNA decay pathways, the components of the mRNA degradation machinery, and the way in which these might relate to the translation apparatus. Overall, major challenges still to be addressed include the task of relating principles of posttranscriptional control to cellular compartmentalization and polysome structure and the role of molecular channelling in these highly complex expression systems.

Amino acid availability regulates p70 S6 kinase and multiple translation factors

Incubation of Chinese hamster ovary cells without amino acids for up to 60 min caused a rapid marked decrease in p70 S6 kinase activity and increased binding of initiation factor eIF4E to its inhibitory regulator protein 4E-BP1. This was associated with dephosphorylation of 4E-BP1 and eIF4E and dissociation of eIF4E from eIF4G. All these effects were rapidly reversed by resupplying a mixture of amino acids and this was blocked by rapamycin and by inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, implying a role for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in the signalling pathway linking amino acids with the control of p70 S6 kinase activity and the phosphorylation of these translation factors. Amino acid withdrawal also led to changes in the phosphorylation of other translation factors; phosphorylation of eIF4E decreased whereas elongation factor eEF2 became more heavily phosphorylated, each of these changes being associated with decreased activity of the factor in question. Earlier studies have suggested that protein kinase B (PKB) may act upstream of p70 S6 kinase. However, amino acids did not affect the activity of PKB, indicating that amino acids activate p70 S6 kinase through a pathway independent of this enzyme. Studies with individual amino acids suggested that the effects on p70 S6 kinase activity and translation-factor phosphorylation were independent of cell swelling. The data show that amino acid supply regulates multiple translation factors in mammalian cells.

The phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor eIF4E in response to phorbol esters, cell stresses, and cytokines is mediated by distinct MAP kinase pathways

Initiation factor eIF4E binds to the 5'-cap of eukaryotic mRNAs and plays a key role in the mechanism and regulation of translation. It may be regulated through its own phosphorylation and through inhibitory binding proteins (4E-BPs), which modulate its availability for initiation complex assembly. eIF4E phosphorylation is enhanced by phorbol esters. We show, using specific inhibitors, that this involves both the p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase and Erk signaling pathways. Cell stresses such as arsenite and anisomycin and the cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta also cause increased phosphorylation of eIF4E, which is abolished by the specific p38 MAP kinase inhibitor, SB203580. These changes in eIF4E phosphorylation parallel the activity of the eIF4E kinase, Mnk1. However other stresses such as heat shock, sorbitol, and H2O2, which also stimulate p38 MAP kinase and increase Mnk1 activity, do not increase phosphorylation of eIF4E. The latter stresses increase the binding of eIF4E to 4E-BP1, and we show that this blocks the phosphorylation of eIF4E by Mnk1 in vitro, which may explain the absence of an increase in eIF4E phosphorylation under these conditions.