Recognition, targeting, and hydrolysis of the lambda O replication protein by the ClpP/ClpX protease

Trans-targeting of the phage Mu repressor is promoted by conformational changes that expose its ClpX recognition determinant

Dominant negative forms of the phage Mu repressor, including the mutant Vir repressors, are not only rapidly degraded by the ClpXP protease but also promote degradation of the unmodified, wild-type repressor. This trans-targeting of the wild-type repressor depends upon a determinant within its C-terminal domain, which is needed for recognition by ClpX. An environmentally sensitive fluorescent probe (2-(4'-maleimidylanilino)naphthalene-6-sulfonic acid (MIANS)) attached to the C terminus of the full-length repressor indicated that Vir induces the movement of this domain into a more exposed configuration. Vir also promoted attachment of MIANS to the C terminus of the repressor at an accelerated rate, and it greatly increased the rate of phosphorylation of a cAMP-dependent protein kinase motif attached to the repressor C terminus. While an excess of Vir was needed to promote repressor phosphorylation at maximal rates, the presence of ClpX could increase phosphorylation rates at lower Vir levels. trans-Targeting of the Mu repressor is therefore promoted by exposing its ClpX recognition determinant, and the action of ClpX can assist Vir in exposing these determinants.

The CtrA response regulator essential for Caulobacter crescentus cell-cycle progression requires a bipartite degradation signal for temporally controlled proteolysis

The two-component signaling protein CtrA activates or represses the expression of one-quarter of the cell-cycle-regulated genes in Caulobacter crescentus, integrating DNA replication, morphogenesis, and cell division. The activity of this essential protein is controlled by a positive transcriptional feedback loop, cell-cycle-regulated phosphorylation, and rapid proteolysis as cells enter S-phase at the swarmer-to-stalked cell transition and in the stalked portion of the asymmetric predivisional cell. CtrA activity must be removed from cells at the onset of DNA replication, because phosphorylated CtrA binds to and silences the origin of replication. The ClpXP protease is required for CtrA proteolysis but is present throughout the cell-cycle, so the mechanism for activating and deactivating CtrA proteolysis is unknown. Here, we identify a bipartite proteolytic signal in the CtrA response regulator consisting of two determinants that are each necessary but not sufficient for regulated degradation. One determinant is present in the last 15 amino acid residues of CtrA, particularly the terminal Ala-Ala residues, and another is located within the first 56 residues of the CtrA receiver domain. A fusion of the receiver domain and last 15 residues of CtrA to YFP is properly degraded in living cells. Although the N-terminal 56 residues contain the conserved Asp51 phosphorylation site, mutant analyses show that cell-cycle-controlled CtrA proteolysis is insensitive to the CtrA phosphorylation state. The N-terminal proteolytic determinant is predicted to reside on the surface of the receiver domain in beta-sheet 2 and alpha-helix 2.

Characterization of a specificity factor for an AAA+ ATPase: assembly of SspB dimers with ssrA-tagged proteins and the ClpX hexamer

SspB, a specificity factor for the ATP-dependent ClpXP protease, stimulates proteolysis of protein substrates bearing the ssrA degradation tag. The SspB protein is shown here to form a stable homodimer with two independent binding sites for ssrA-tagged proteins or peptides. SspB by itself binds to ClpX and stimulates the ATPase activity of this enzyme. In the presence of ATPgammaS, a ternary complex of SspB, GFP-ssrA, and the ClpX ATPase was sufficiently stable to isolate by gel-filtration or ion-exchange chromatography. This complex consists of one SspB dimer, two molecules of GFP-ssrA, and one ClpX hexamer. SspB dimers do not commit bound substrates to ClpXP degradation but increase the affinity and cooperativity of binding of ssrA-tagged substrates to ClpX, facilitating enhanced degradation at low substrate concentrations.

Alternating translocation of protein substrates from both ends of ClpXP protease

In ClpXP protease complexes, hexameric rings of the ATP-dependent ClpX chaperone stack on one or both faces of the double-heptameric rings of ClpP. We used electron microscopy to record the initial binding of protein substrates to ClpXP and their accumulation inside proteolytically inactive ClpP. Proteins with N- or C-terminal recognition motifs bound to complexes at the distal surface of ClpX and, upon addition of ATP, were translocated to ClpP. With a partially translocated substrate, the non-translocated portion remained on the surface of ClpX, aligned with the central axis of the complex, confirming that translocation proceeds through the axial channel of ClpXP. Starting with substrate bound on both ends, most complexes translocated substrate from only one end, and rarely (<5%) from both ends. We propose that translocation from one side is favored for two reasons: initiation of translocation is infrequent, making the probability of simultaneous initiation low; and, further, the presence of protein within the cis side translocation channel or within ClpP generates an inhibitory signal blocking translocation from the trans side.

Membrane protein degradation by FtsH can be initiated from either end

FtsH, a membrane-bound metalloprotease, with cytoplasmic metalloprotease and AAA ATPase domains, degrades both soluble and integral membrane proteins in Escherichia coli. In this paper we investigated how membrane-embedded substrates are recognized by this enzyme. We showed previously that FtsH can initiate processive proteolysis at an N-terminal cytosolic tail of a membrane protein, by recognizing its length (more than 20 amino acid residues) but not exact sequence. Subsequent proteolysis should involve dislocation of the substrates into the cytosol. We now show that this enzyme can also initiate proteolysis at a C-terminal cytosolic tail and that the initiation efficiency depends on the length of the tail. This mode of degradation also appeared to be processive, which can be aborted by a tightly folded periplasmic domain. These results indicate that FtsH can exhibit processivity against membrane-embedded substrates in either the N-to-C or C-to-N direction. Our results also suggest that some membrane proteins receive bidirectional degradation simultaneously. These results raise intriguing questions about the molecular directionality of the dislocation and proteolysis catalyzed by FtsH.

Clp ATPases and their role in protein unfolding and degradation

Although much has been learned about the structure and function of Clp chaperones and their role in proteolysis, the mechanism of protein unfolding catalyzed by Clp ATPases and the mechanism of translocation of the unfolded proteins from Clp ATPases to partner proteases remain unsolved puzzles. However, models in which mechanical force is used to destabilize the structure of the substrate in a processive and directional manner are probable. It also seems likely that when ClpA ATPases are associated with proteases, unfolding is coupled to extrusion of the unfolded protein into the proteolytic cavity. In summary, it is anticipated that the large family of Clp ATPases will accomplish their many important cellular functions by similar mechanisms and what has been learned by studying the prokaryotic members reviewed here will shed a great deal of light on all members of the family.

ClpAP and ClpXP degrade proteins with tags located in the interior of the primary sequence

Clp/Hsp100 ATPases comprise a large family of ATP-dependent chaperones, some of which are regulatory components of two-component proteases. Substrate specificity resides in the Clp protein and the current thinking is that Clp proteins recognize motifs located near one or the other end of the substrate. We tested whether or not ClpA and ClpX can recognize tags when they are located in the interior of the primary sequence of the substrate. A protein with an NH2-terminal ClpA recognition tag, plasmid P1 RepA, was fused to the COOH terminus of green fluorescent protein (GFP). GFP is not recognized by ClpA or ClpX and is not degraded by ClpAP or ClpXP. We found that ClpA binds and unfolds the fusion protein and ClpAP degrades the protein. Both the GFP and RepA portions of the fusion protein are degraded. A protein with a COOH-terminal ClpX tag, MuA, was fused to the NH2 terminus of GFP. ClpXP degrades MuA-GFP, however, the rate is 10-fold slower than that of GFP-MuA. The MuA portion but not the GFP portion of MuA-GFP is degraded. Thus, a substrate with an internal ClpA recognition motif can be unfolded by ClpA and degraded by ClpAP. Similarly, although less efficiently, ClpXP degrades a substrate with an internal ClpX recognition motif. We also found that ClpA recognizes the NH2-terminal 15 aa RepA tag, when it is fused to the COOH terminus of GFP. Moreover, ClpA recognizes the RepA tag in either the authentic or inverse orientation.

ClpP-dependent degradation of PopR allows tightly regulated expression of the clpP3 clpP4 operon in Streptomyces lividans

Five clpP genes have been identified in Streptomyces coelicolor. The clpP1 and clpP2 genes form one operon, the clpP3 and clpP4 genes form another, and clpP5 is monocistronic. Previous studies in Streptomyces lividans have shown that the first operon (clpP1 clpP2) is required for a normal cell cycle. Expression of the second operon (clpP3 clpP4) is activated by PopR if the first operon is nonfunctional. We show here that PopR degradation is primarily dependent on ClpP1 and ClpP2, but can also be achieved by ClpP3 and ClpP4. The carboxy-terminus of PopR plays an essential part in the degradation process. Indeed, replacement of the last two alanine residues by aspartate residues greatly increased PopR stability. These substitutions did not impair PopR activity and, as expected, accumulation of the mutant form of PopR led to very strong expression of the clpP3 clpP4 operon. Increased PopR levels led to delayed sporulation. The results obtained in this study support the notion of cross-processing between ClpP1 and ClpP2.

Degradation of L-glutamate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli: allosteric regulation of enzyme stability

L-glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) is stable in exponentially growing Escherichia coli cells but is degraded at a rate of 20-30% per hour in cells starved for either nitrogen or carbon. GDH degradation is energy-dependent, and mutations in ATP-dependent proteases, ClpAP or Lon lead to partial stabilization. Degradation is inhibited by chloramphenicol and is completely blocked in relA mutant cells, suggesting that ribosome-mediated signaling may facilitate GDH degradation. Purified GDH has a single tight site for NADPH binding. Binding of NADPH in the absence of other ligands leads to destabilization of the enzyme. NADPH-induced instability and sensitivity to proteolysis is reversed by tri- and dicarboxylic acids or nucleoside di- and triphosphates. GTP and ppGpp bind to GDH at an allosteric site and reverse the destabilizing effects of NADPH. Native GDH is resistant to degradation by several purified ATP-dependent proteases: ClpAP, ClpXP, Lon, and ClpYQ, but denatured GDH is degraded by ClpAP. Our results suggest that, in vivo, GDH is sensitized to proteases by loss of a stabilizing ligand or interaction with an destabilizing metabolite that accumulates in starving cells, and that any of several ATP-dependent proteases degrade the sensitized protein.

Overlapping recognition determinants within the ssrA degradation tag allow modulation of proteolysis

The ssrA tag, an 11-aa peptide added to the C terminus of proteins stalled during translation, targets proteins for degradation by ClpXP and ClpAP. Mutational analysis of the ssrA tag reveals independent, but overlapping determinants for its interactions with ClpX, ClpA, and SspB, a specificity-enhancing factor for ClpX. ClpX interacts with residues 9-11 at the C terminus of the tag, whereas ClpA recognizes positions 8-10 in addition to residues 1-2 at the N terminus. SspB interacts with residues 1-4 and 7, N-terminal to the ClpX-binding determinants, but overlapping the ClpA determinants. As a result, SspB and ClpX work together to recognize ssrA-tagged substrates efficiently, whereas SspB inhibits recognition of these substrates by ClpA. Thus, dissection of the recognition signals within the ssrA tag provides insight into how multiple proteins function in concert to modulate proteolysis.

Proteolysis of the Caulobacter McpA chemoreceptor is cell cycle regulated by a ClpX-dependent pathway

Proteolysis is involved in cell differentiation and the progression through the cell cycle in Caulobacter crescentus. We have constitutively expressed the transmembrane chemoreceptor McpA from a multicopy plasmid to demonstrate that McpA degradation is modulated during the cell cycle. The level of McpA protein starts to decrease only when the swarmer cells differentiate into stalked cells. The reduction in McpA protein levels is maintained until the stalked cells develop into predivisional cells, at which point the level returns to that observed in swarmer cells. The cell-cycle-regulated degradation of McpA does not require the last 12 C-terminal amino acids, but it does require three amino acids (AAL) located 15 residues away from the C terminus. The ClpXP protease is essential in C. crescentus for viability, and thus, we tested McpA degradation in xylose conditional mutants. The effect on McpA degradation occurred within two generations from the start of ClpX depletion. The conditional mutants' growth rate was only slightly affected, suggesting that ClpX is directly involved in McpA proteolysis.

Regulation of SulA cleavage by Lon protease by the C-terminal amino acid of SulA, histidine

SulA protein, a cell division inhibitor in Escherichia coli, is degraded by Lon protease. The C-terminal eight residues of SulA have been shown to be recognized by Lon; however, it remains to be elucidated which amino acid in the C-terminus of SulA is critical for the recognition of SulA by Lon. To clarify this point, we constructed mutants of SulA with changes in the C-terminal residues, and examined the accumulation and stability of the resulting mutant SulA proteins in vivo. Substitution of the extreme C-terminal histidine residue with another amino acid led to marked accumulation and high stability of SulA in lon(+) cells. A SulA mutant in which the C-terminal eight residues were deleted (SulAC161) showed high accumulation and stability, but the addition of histidine to the C-terminus of SulAC161 (SulAC161+H) made it labile. Similarly, SulAC161+H fused to maltose-binding protein (MBP-SulAC161+H) formed a tight complex with and was degraded rapidly by Lon in vitro. Histidine competitively inhibited the degradation of MBP-SulA by Lon, while other amino acids did not. These results suggest that the histidine residue at the extreme C-terminus of SulA is recognized specifically by Lon, leading to a high-affinity interaction between SulA and Lon.

AAA+ superfamily ATPases: common structure--diverse function

The AAA+ superfamily of ATPases, which contain a homologous ATPase module, are found in all kingdoms of living organisms where they participate in diverse cellular processes including membrane fusion, proteolysis and DNA replication. Recent structural studies have revealed that they usually form ring-shaped oligomers, which are crucial for their ATPase activities and mechanisms of action. These ring-shaped oligomeric complexes are versatile in their mode of action, which collectively seem to involve some form of disruption of molecular or macromolecular structure; unfolding of proteins, disassembly of protein complexes, unwinding of DNA, or alteration of the state of DNA-protein complexes. Thus, the AAA+ proteins represent a novel type of molecular chaperone. Comparative analyses have also revealed significant similarities and differences in structure and molecular mechanism between AAA+ ATPases and other ring-shaped ATPases.

ClpA mediates directional translocation of substrate proteins into the ClpP protease

The intracellular degradation of many proteins is mediated in an ATP-dependent manner by large assemblies comprising a chaperone ring complex associated coaxially with a proteolytic cylinder, e.g., ClpAP, ClpXP, and HslUV in prokaryotes, and the 26S proteasome in eukaryotes. Recent studies of the chaperone ClpA indicate that it mediates ATP-dependent unfolding of substrate proteins and directs their ATP-dependent translocation into the ClpP protease. Because the axial passageway into the proteolytic chamber is narrow, it seems likely that unfolded substrate proteins are threaded from the chaperone into the protease, suggesting that translocation could be directional. We have investigated directionality in the ClpA/ClpP-mediated reaction by using two substrate proteins bearing the COOH-terminal ssrA recognition element, each labeled near the NH(2) or COOH terminus with fluorescent probes. Time-dependent changes in both fluorescence anisotropy and fluorescence resonance energy transfer between donor fluorophores in the ClpP cavity and the substrate probes as acceptors were measured to monitor translocation of the substrates from ClpA into ClpP. We observed for both substrates that energy transfer occurs 2--4 s sooner with the COOH-terminally labeled molecules than with the NH(2)-terminally labeled ones, indicating that translocation is indeed directional, with the COOH terminus of the substrate protein entering ClpP first.

Visualization of substrate binding and translocation by the ATP-dependent protease, ClpXP

Binding and internalization of a protein substrate by E. coli ClpXP was investigated by electron microscopy. In sideviews of ATP gamma S-stabilized ClpXP complexes, a narrow axial channel was visible in ClpX, surrounded by protrusions on its distal surface. When substrate lambda O protein was added, extra density attached to this surface. Upon addition of ATP, this density disappeared as lambda O was degraded. When ATP was added to proteolytically inactive ClpXP-lambda O complexes, the extra density transferred to the center of ClpP and remained inside ClpP after separation from ClpX. We propose that substrates of ATP-dependent proteases bind to specific sites on the distal surface of the ATPase, and are subsequently unfolded and translocated into the internal chamber of the protease.

Substrate recognition by the ClpA chaperone component of ClpAP protease

ClpA, a member of the Clp/Hsp100 ATPase family, is a molecular chaperone and regulatory component of ClpAP protease. We explored the mechanism of protein recognition by ClpA using a high affinity substrate, RepA, which is activated for DNA binding by ClpA and degraded by ClpAP. By characterizing RepA derivatives with N- or C-terminal deletions, we found that the N-terminal portion of RepA is required for recognition. More precisely, RepA derivatives lacking the N-terminal 5 or 10 amino acids are degraded by ClpAP at a rate similar to full-length RepA, whereas RepA derivatives lacking 15 or 20 amino acids are degraded much more slowly. Thus, ClpA recognizes an N-terminal signal in RepA beginning in the vicinity of amino acids 10-15. Moreover, peptides corresponding to RepA amino acids 4-13 and 1-15 inhibit interactions between ClpA and RepA. We constructed fusions of RepA and green fluorescent protein, a protein not recognized by ClpA, and found that the N-terminal 15 amino acids of RepA are sufficient to target the fusion protein for degradation by ClpAP. However, fusion proteins containing 46 or 70 N-terminal amino acids of RepA are degraded more efficiently in vitro and are noticeably stabilized in vivo in clpADelta and clpPDelta strains compared with wild type.

A specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP degradation machine

Events that stall bacterial protein synthesis activate the ssrA-tagging machinery, resulting in resumption of translation and addition of an 11-residue peptide to the carboxyl terminus of the nascent chain. This ssrA-encoded peptide tag marks the incomplete protein for degradation by the energy-dependent ClpXP protease. Here, a ribosome-associated protein, SspB, was found to bind specifically to ssrA-tagged proteins and to enhance recognition of these proteins by ClpXP. Cells with an sspB mutation are defective in degrading ssrA-tagged proteins, demonstrating that SspB is a specificity-enhancing factor for ClpXP that controls substrate choice.

Unfolding and internalization of proteins by the ATP-dependent proteases ClpXP and ClpAP

ClpX and ClpA are molecular chaperones that interact with specific proteins and, together with ClpP, activate their ATP-dependent degradation. The chaperone activity is thought to convert proteins into an extended conformation that can access the sequestered active sites of ClpP. We now show that ClpX can catalyze unfolding of a green fluorescent protein fused to a ClpX recognition motif (GFP-SsrA). Unfolding of GFP-SsrA depends on ATP hydrolysis. GFP-SsrA unfolded either by ClpX or by treatment with denaturants binds to ClpX in the presence of adenosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) and is released slowly (t(1/2) approximately 15 min). Unlike ClpA, ClpX cannot trap unfolded proteins in stable complexes unless they also have a high-affinity binding motif. Addition of ATP or ADP accelerates release (t(1/2) approximately 1 min), consistent with a model in which ATP hydrolysis induces a conformation of ClpX with low affinity for unfolded substrates. Proteolytically inactive complexes of ClpXP and ClpAP unfold GFP-SsrA and translocate the protein to ClpP, where it remains unfolded. Complexes of ClpXP with translocated substrate within the ClpP chamber retain the ability to unfold GFP-SsrA. Our results suggest a bipartite mode of interaction between ClpX and substrates. ClpX preferentially targets motifs exposed in specific proteins. As the protein is unfolded by ClpX, additional motifs are exposed that facilitate its retention and favor its translocation to ClpP for degradation.

Dynamics of substrate denaturation and translocation by the ClpXP degradation machine

ClpXP is a protein machine composed of the ClpX ATPase, a member of the Clp/Hsp100 family of remodeling enzymes, and the ClpP peptidase. Here, ClpX and ClpXP are shown to catalyze denaturation of GFP modified with an ssrA degradation tag. ClpX translocates this denatured protein into the proteolytic chamber of ClpP and, when proteolysis is blocked, also catalyzes release of denatured GFP-ssrA from ClpP in a reaction that requires ATP and additional substrate. Kinetic experiments reveal that multiple reaction steps require collaboration between ClpX and ClpP and that denaturation is the rate-determining step in degradation. These insights into the mechanism of ClpXP explain how it executes efficient degradation in a manner that is highly specific for tagged proteins, irrespective of their intrinsic stabilities.

Posttranslational quality control: folding, refolding, and degrading proteins

Polypeptides emerging from the ribosome must fold into stable three-dimensional structures and maintain that structure throughout their functional lifetimes. Maintaining quality control over protein structure and function depends on molecular chaperones and proteases, both of which can recognize hydrophobic regions exposed on unfolded polypeptides. Molecular chaperones promote proper protein folding and prevent aggregation, and energy-dependent proteases eliminate irreversibly damaged proteins. The kinetics of partitioning between chaperones and proteases determines whether a protein will be destroyed before it folds properly. When both quality control options fail, damaged proteins accumulate as aggregates, a process associated with amyloid diseases.