Myosin-X induces filopodia by multiple elongation mechanism

Myosin-X facilitates Shigella-induced membrane protrusions and cell-to-cell spread

The intracellular pathogen Shigella flexneri forms membrane protrusions to spread from cell to cell. As protrusions form, myosin-X (Myo10) localizes to Shigella. Electron micrographs of immunogold-labelled Shigella-infected HeLa cells reveal that Myo10 concentrates at the bases and along the sides of bacteria within membrane protrusions. Time-lapse video microscopy shows that a full-length Myo10 GFP-construct cycles along the sides of Shigella within the membrane protrusions as these structures progressively lengthen. RNAi knock-down of Myo10 is associated with shorter protrusions with thicker stalks, and causes a >80% decrease in confluent cell plaque formation. Myo10 also concentrates in membrane protrusions formed by another intracellular bacteria, Listeria, and knock-down of Myo10 also impairs Listeria plaque formation. In Cos7 cells (contain low concentrations of Myo10), the expression of full-length Myo10 nearly doubles Shigella-induced protrusion length, and lengthening requires the head domain, as well as the tail-PH domain, but not the FERM domain. The GFP-Myo10-HMM domain localizes to the sides of Shigella within membrane protrusions and the GFP-Myo10-PH domain localizes to host cell membranes. We conclude thatMyo10 generates the force to enhance bacterial-induced protrusions by binding its head region to actin filaments and its PH tail domain to the peripheral membrane.

Myosin-X: a MyTH-FERM myosin at the tips of filopodia

Myosin-X (Myo10) is an unconventional myosin with MyTH4-FERM domains that is best known for its striking localization to the tips of filopodia and its ability to induce filopodia. Although the head domain of Myo10 enables it to function as an actin-based motor, its tail contains binding sites for several molecules with central roles in cell biology, including phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate, microtubules and integrins. Myo10 also undergoes fascinating long-range movements within filopodia, which appear to represent a newly recognized system of transport. Myo10 is also unusual in that it is a myosin with important roles in the spindle, a microtubule-based structure. Exciting new studies have begun to reveal the structure and single-molecule properties of this intriguing myosin, as well as its mechanisms of regulation and induction of filopodia. At the cellular and organismal level, growing evidence demonstrates that Myo10 has crucial functions in numerous processes ranging from invadopodia formation to cell migration.

Myosin-X functions in polarized epithelial cells

Myosin-X, an unconventional myosin that has been studied primarily in fibroblast-like cells, has been shown to have important functions in polarized epithelial cell junction formation, regulation of paracellular permeability, and epithelial morphogenesis.

Myosin-X (Myo10) is an unconventional myosin that localizes to the tips of filopodia and has critical functions in filopodia. Although Myo10 has been studied primarily in nonpolarized, fibroblast-like cells, Myo10 is expressed in vivo in many epithelia-rich tissues, such as kidney. In this study, we investigate the localization and functions of Myo10 in polarized epithelial cells, using Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells as a model system. Calcium-switch experiments demonstrate that, during junction assembly, green fluorescent protein–Myo10 localizes to lateral membrane cell–cell contacts and to filopodia-like structures imaged by total internal reflection fluorescence on the basal surface. Knockdown of Myo10 leads to delayed recruitment of E-cadherin and ZO-1 to junctions, as well as a delay in tight junction barrier formation, as indicated by a delay in the development of peak transepithelial electrical resistance (TER). Although Myo10 knockdown cells eventually mature into monolayers with normal TER, these monolayers do exhibit increased paracellular permeability to fluorescent dextrans. Importantly, knockdown of Myo10 leads to mitotic spindle misorientation, and in three-dimensional culture, Myo10 knockdown cysts exhibit defects in lumen formation. Together these results reveal that Myo10 functions in polarized epithelial cells in junction formation, regulation of paracellular permeability, and epithelial morphogenesis.

Differential regulation of myosin X movements by its cargos, DCC and neogenin

Myosin X (Myo X), also known as MYO10, is an unconventional actin-based motor protein that plays an important role in filopodium formation. Its intra-filopodia movement, an event tightly associated with the function of Myo X, has been extensively studied. However, how the motor activity of Myo X and the direction of its movements are regulated remains largely unknown. In our previous study, we demonstrated that DCC (for 'deleted in colorectal carcinoma') and neogenin (neogenin 1, NEO1 or NGN), a family of immunoglobin-domain-containing transmembrane receptors for netrins, interact with Myo X and that DCC is a cargo of Myo X to be delivered to the neurites of cultured neurons. Here, we provide evidence for DCC and neogenin as regulators of Myo X. DCC promotes movement of Myo X along basal actin filaments and enhances Myo-X-mediated basal filopodium elongation. By contrast, neogenin appears to suppress Myo X movement on the basal side, but increases its movement towards the apical and dorsal side of a cell, promoting dorsal filopodium formation and growth. Further studies have demonstrated that DCC, but not neogenin, enhances integrin-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase and basal F-actin reorganization, providing a cellular mechanism underlying their distinct effects on Myo X. These results thus demonstrate differential regulatory roles on Myo X activity by its cargo proteins, DCC and neogenin, revealing different cellular functions of DCC and neogenin.

The cytoskeletal and signaling mechanisms of axon collateral branching

During development, axons are guided to their appropriate targets by a variety of guidance factors. On arriving at their synaptic targets, or while en route, axons form branches. Branches generated de novo from the main axon are termed collateral branches. The generation of axon collateral branches allows individual neurons to make contacts with multiple neurons within a target and with multiple targets. In the adult nervous system, the formation of axon collateral branches is associated with injury and disease states and may contribute to normally occurring plasticity. Collateral branches are initiated by actin filament– based axonal protrusions that subsequently become invaded by microtubules, thereby allowing the branch to mature and continue extending. This article reviews the current knowledge of the cellular mechanisms of the formation of axon collateral branches. The major conclusions of this review are (1) the mechanisms of axon extension and branching are not identical; (2) active suppression of protrusive activity along the axon negatively regulates branching; (3) the earliest steps in the formation of axon branches involve focal activation of signaling pathways within axons, which in turn drive the formation of actin-based protrusions; and (4) regulation of the microtubule array by microtubule-associated and severing proteins underlies the development of branches. Linking the activation of signaling pathways to specific proteins that directly regulate the axonal cytoskeleton underlying the formation of collateral branches remains a frontier in the field.

Structural basis of the myosin X PH1(N)-PH2-PH1(C) tandem as a specific and acute cellular PI(3,4,5)P(3) sensor

The first PH domain of the myosin X cargo-binding domain is split into halves by insertion of another PH domain forming a PH1N-PH2-PH1C tandem. This tandem forms a rigid supramodule with the two lipid-binding pockets juxtaposed for cooperative binding to PI(3,4,5)P3-containing lipid membranes.

Myosin X (MyoX) is an unconventional myosin that is known to induce the formation and elongation of filopodia in many cell types. MyoX-induced filopodial induction requires the three PH domains in its tail region, although with unknown underlying molecular mechanisms. MyoX's first PH domain is split into halves by its second PH domain. We show here that the PH1_N-PH2-PH1_C tandem allows MyoX to bind to phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-triphosphate [PI(3,4,5)P₃] with high specificity and cooperativity. We further show that PH2 is responsible for the specificity of the PI(3,4,5)P₃ interaction, whereas PH1 functions to enhance the lipid membrane–binding avidity of the tandem. The structure of the MyoX PH1_N-PH2-PH1_C tandem reveals that the split PH1, PH2, and the highly conserved interdomain linker sequences together form a rigid supramodule with two lipid-binding pockets positioned side by side for binding to phosphoinositide membrane bilayers with cooperativity. Finally, we demonstrate that disruption of PH2-mediated binding to PI(3,4,5)P₃ abolishes MyoX's function in inducing filopodial formation and elongation.

On the mechanical stabilization of filopodia

We studied force-induced elongation of filopodia by coupling magnetic tweezers to the tip through the bacterial coat protein invasin, which couples the force generator to the actin bundles (through myosin X), thus impeding the growth of the actin plus end. Single force pulses (15-30 s) with amplitudes between 20 and 600 pN and staircase-like force scenarios (amplitudes, ∼50 pN; step widths, 30 s) were applied. In both cases, the responses consist of a fast viscoelastic deflection followed by a linear flow regime. The deflections are reversible after switching off the forces, suggesting a mechanical memory. The elongation velocity exhibits an exponential distribution (half-width <v(1/2)>, ∼0.02 μm s(-1)) and did not increase systematically with the force amplitudes. We estimate the bending modulus (0.4 × 10(-23) J m) and the number of actin filaments (∼10) by analyzing filopodium bending fluctuations. Sequestering of intracellular Ca(2+) by BAPTA caused a strong reduction in the amplitude of elongation, whereas latrunculin A resulted in loss of the elastic response. We attribute the force-independent velocity to the elongation of actin bundles enabled by the force-induced actin membrane uncoupling and the reversibility by the treadmilling mechanism and an elastic response.

Cargo recognition mechanism of myosin X revealed by the structure of its tail MyTH4-FERM tandem in complex with the DCC P3 domain

Myosin X (MyoX), encoded by Myo10, is a representative member of the MyTH4-FERM domain-containing myosins, and this family of unconventional myosins shares common functions in promoting formation of filopodia/stereocilia structures in many cell types with unknown mechanisms. Here, we present the structure of the MyoX MyTH4-FERM tandem in complex with the cytoplasmic tail P3 domain of the netrin receptor DCC. The structure, together with biochemical studies, reveals that the MyoX MyTH4 and FERM domains interact with each other, forming a structural and functional supramodule. Instead of forming an extended β-strand structure in other FERM binding targets, DCC_P3 forms a single α-helix and binds to the αβ-groove formed by β5 and α1 of the MyoX FERM F3 lobe. Structure-based amino acid sequence analysis reveals that the key polar residues forming the inter-MyTH4/FERM interface are absolutely conserved in all MyTH4-FERM tandem-containing proteins, suggesting that the supramodular nature of the MyTH4-FERM tandem is likely a general property for all MyTH4-FERM proteins.

Assembly of filopodia by the formin FRL2 (FMNL3)

Actin-dependent finger-like protrusions such as filopodia and microvilli are widespread in eukaryotes, but their assembly mechanisms are poorly understood. Filopodia assembly requires at least three biochemical activities on actin: actin filament nucleation, prolonged actin filament elongation, and actin filament bundling. These activities are shared by several mammalian formin proteins, including mDia2, FRL1 (also called FMNL1), and FRL2 (FMNL3). In this paper, we compare the abilities of constructs from these three formins to induce filopodia. FH1-FH2 constructs of both FRL2 and mDia2 stimulate potent filopodia assembly in multiple cell types, and enrich strongly at filopodia tips. In contrast, FRL1 FH1-FH2 lacks this activity, despite possessing similar biochemical activities and being highly homologous to FRL2. Chimeric FH1-FH2 experiments between FRL1 and FRL2 show that, while both an FH1 and an FH2 are needed, either FH1 domain supports filopodia assembly but only FRL2's FH2 domain allows this activity. A mutation that compromises FRL2's barbed end binding ability abolishes filopodia assembly. FRL2's ability to stimulate filopodia assembly is not altered by additional domains (GBD, DID, DAD), but is significantly reduced in the full-length construct, suggesting that FRL2 is subject to inhibitory regulation. The data suggest that the FH2 domain of FRL2 possesses properties not shared by FRL1 that allow it to generate filopodia.