Surgical treatment of talus fractures: a retrospective study of 80 cases followed for 1-15 years

Verletzungen des Fußes beim polytraumatisierten Patienten

Foot injuries in polytraumatized patients are not critical for survival but for the later quality of life. Closed fractures or dislocations of the foot are frequently overlooked or misinterpreted in association with polytrauma, which leads to severe functional impairment in those patients who survive. Repeated clinical examinations and early radiographic examinations are essential in the unconscious patient after resuscitation. Emergent indications for surgery even in the presence of multiple injuries are open injuries, incarcerated soft tissues, manifest compartment syndrome of the foot, and neurovascular injury. The decision on limb salvage or amputation has to be individualized with respect to the patient's overall condition and the severity of local trauma to the foot. The "life before limb" principle has to be respected. Emergent reduction of fracture dislocations of the talus, calcaneus, Chopart's and Lisfranc's joints via direct approaches and temporary transfixation with K-wires should be attempted in a first step whenever possible. Additional external fixation facilitates wound care and prevents soft tissue contractions until definite internal fixation becomes feasible. Early soft tissue coverage is always sought in order to avoid infection.

[Treatment strategy for talus fractures]

Fractures of the talus are uncommon, but they present difficult treatment challenges. The classifications of fractures are based on conventional X-rays, but the CT scan is necessary for treatment decisions. Open fractures, displaced fracture dislocations, or extrusion of the talus must be reduced and stabilized as an emergency procedure. In all cases of displaced fractures, ORIF is indicated. The use of standardized approaches depends on the type of fracture and the soft tissue lesion. Precise anatomic reduction of all facets and reconstruction of the shape of the talus and stabilization with interfragmentary lag screws is the method of choice in almost all fractures. This procedure allows early mobilization postoperatively. The outcome is related to the degree of fracture displacement and the soft tissue lesion but may be poor due to inadequate treatment. Talus malunion, nonunion, and secondary deformity should be corrected early with preservation of the joints whenever possible. Arthrodeses should be restricted to the affected joints.

Open reduction and stable fixation of isolated, displaced talar neck and body fractures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective review was to evaluate the long-term results of surgical treatment of isolated, displaced talar neck and/or body fractures with stable internal fixation.

METHODS

The study included twenty-five patients with a total of twenty-six displaced fractures isolated to the talus that had been treated with open reduction and stable internal fixation and followed for a minimum of forty-eight months after the injury. The final follow-up examination included standard radiographs, computed tomography, and a clinical evaluation. Variables that were analyzed included wound type, fracture type, Hawkins type, comminution, timing of the surgical intervention, surgical approach, quality of fracture reduction, Hawkins sign, osteonecrosis, union, time to union, posttraumatic arthritis, and the AOFAS scores including subscores (pain, function, and alignment).

RESULTS

The average duration of follow-up was seventy-four months. Surgical intervention resulted in sixteen fractures with an anatomic reduction, five with a nearly anatomic reduction, and five with a poor reduction. All eight noncomminuted fractures were anatomically reduced. The overall union rate was 88%. All closed, displaced talar neck fractures healed, regardless of the time delay until surgical intervention. Posttraumatic arthritis of the subtalar joint was the most common finding and was seen in all patients, sixteen of whom had involvement of more than one joint. Osteonecrosis was a common finding, seen after thirteen of the twenty-six fractures overall and after six of the seven open fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Open reduction and internal fixation is recommended for the treatment of displaced talar neck and/or body fractures. A delay in surgical fixation does not appear to affect the outcome, union, or prevalence of osteonecrosis. Posttraumatic arthritis is a more common complication than osteonecrosis following operative treatment. Patients with a displaced fracture of the talus should be counseled that posttraumatic arthritis and chronic pain are expected outcomes even after anatomic reduction and stable fixation. This is especially true following open fractures.

Functional outcomes following displaced talar neck fractures

OBJECTIVES

To determine the outcome of displaced talar neck fractures at long-term follow-up in terms of functional outcome and secondary reconstructive surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

Seventy patients with displaced talar neck fractures.

INTERVENTION

All patients were treated with open reduction and screw fixation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Functional outcome of patients who did not require secondary surgery was assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale score, and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score. The incidence of secondary reconstructive hindfoot surgery, including arthrodesis or talectomy, was measured using life table analysis.

RESULTS

Mean Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score was 20 +/- 18 out of 100, with a lower score indicative of better outcome; mean Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale score was 3.8 +/- 2.4 out of 10 (lower score better); and mean Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score was 71 +/- 19 out of 100 points (higher score better). The incidence of secondary reconstructive surgery increased from 24 +/- 5% at 1 year to 48 +/- 10% at 10 years postinjury.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional outcome varied and was most dependent upon the development of complications. The incidence of secondary reconstructive surgery following talar neck fractures increased over time and was most commonly performed to treat subtalar arthritis or misalignment.

Chopart joint fracture-dislocation: initial open reduction provides better outcome than closed reduction

Injury cause, treatment, and long-term results [American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot Score, Hannover Scoring System, Hannover Outcome Questionnaire] of patients with Chopart joint dislocations or fracture-dislocations were evaluated. Between 1972 and 1997, 100 patients with 110 Chopart joint dislocations were treated in the authors' institution. Pure Chopart joint dislocations were observed in 28 (25%) feet, fracture-dislocations in 60 (55%) feet, and combined Chopart-Lisfranc joint fracture-dislocations in 22 (20%) feet. The primary treatment was operative in 91 (83%) feet and nonoperative in 19 (17%) feet. Sixty-five (65%) patients had follow-up after an average of 9 years (range, 2-25 years). The mean scores of the entire follow-up group were: AOFAS score, 75 points; Hannover Scoring System, 69 points (maximium possible score = 100 points); Hannover Outcome Questionnaire, 68 points (maximium possible score = 100 points). There were no differences between the scores for pure dislocations or fracture-dislocations of the Chopart joint, but significantly lower scores were noted with combined Chopart-Lisfranc joint fracture-dislocations. In all three injury pattern groups, an initial anatomic reduction was essential for good results. The high functional restrictions in Chopart dislocations can most likely be minimized with initial open reduction, especially in fracture-dislocations. A closed reduction yielded good results only with pure dislocations, when anatomic conditions could be restored, or if there were contraindications to surgery.