51
|
Gupta AK, Siddiqui N, Dutta T. A novel mechanism of RyeA/SraC induction under acid stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020; 525:298-302. [PMID: 32087965 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.02.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
RyeA/SraC is a cis-encoded small RNA (sRNA), which act as an anti-toxin to RpoS-regulated RyeB toxin in Escherichia coli. Ectopic expression of RyeA was reported to diminish the RyeB accumulation by serving as a RNA trap. Lower abundance of RyeA in the early exponential growth phase turned out to be the outcome of its degradation by RNase BN/Z. In the current study, we show that RyeA is an acid stress inducible sRNA, and global stress responsive factor RpoS appeared to be inessential in RyeA induction. Although, ryeB-pphA dicistronic transcript at low pH condition was stimulated by ∼4-fold, however, RyeB population was found to be decreased by > 50% under the same condition by the decoy action of enhanced RyeA accumulation. Investigation of the mechanism of RyeA induceduction at low pH in the exponential phase, revealed that RNase BN/Z, which catabolizes RyeA in the exponential phase, appeared to be highly sensitive to low pH stress. Both mRNA and protein level of RNase BN transpired to be decreased to <10% of their initial population. The expression of RyeA under acid stress is regulated by a feed-forward mechanism to normalize the RyeB profusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Kumar Gupta
- RNA Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India
| | - Namra Siddiqui
- RNA Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India
| | - Tanmay Dutta
- RNA Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Phenotypic characterization of a conserved inner membrane protein YhcB in Escherichia coli. J Microbiol 2020; 58:598-605. [PMID: 32323199 DOI: 10.1007/s12275-020-0078-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Although bacteria have diverse membrane proteins, the function of many of them remains unknown or uncertain even in Escherichia coli. In this study, to investigate the function of hypothetical membrane proteins, genome-wide analysis of phenotypes of hypothetical membrane proteins was performed under various envelope stresses. Several genes responsible for adaptation to envelope stresses were identified. Among them, deletion of YhcB, a conserved inner membrane protein of unknown function, caused high sensitivities to various envelope stresses and increased membrane permeability, and caused growth defect under normal growth conditions. Furthermore, yhcB deletion resulted in morphological aberration, such as branched shape, and cell division defects, such as filamentous growth and the generation of chromosome-less cells. The analysis of antibiotic susceptibility showed that the yhcB mutant was highly susceptible to various anti-folate antibiotics. Notably, all phenotypes of the yhcB mutant were completely or significantly restored by YhcB without the transmembrane domain, indicating that the localization of YhcB on the inner membrane is dispensable for its function. Taken together, our results demonstrate that YhcB is involved in cell morphology and cell division in a membrane localization-independent manner.
Collapse
|
53
|
Hör J, Matera G, Vogel J, Gottesman S, Storz G. Trans-Acting Small RNAs and Their Effects on Gene Expression in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. EcoSal Plus 2020; 9:10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0030-2019. [PMID: 32213244 PMCID: PMC7112153 DOI: 10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0030-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The last few decades have led to an explosion in our understanding of the major roles that small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) play in regulatory circuits and the responses to stress in many bacterial species. Much of the foundational work was carried out with Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. The studies of these organisms provided an overview of how the sRNAs function and their impact on bacterial physiology, serving as a blueprint for sRNA biology in many other prokaryotes. They also led to the development of new technologies. In this chapter, we first summarize how these sRNAs were identified, defining them in the process. We discuss how they are regulated and how they act and provide selected examples of their roles in regulatory circuits and the consequences of this regulation. Throughout, we summarize the methodologies that were developed to identify and study the regulatory RNAs, most of which are applicable to other bacteria. Newly updated databases of the known sRNAs in E. coli K-12 and S. enterica Typhimurium SL1344 serve as a reference point for much of the discussion and, hopefully, as a resource for readers and for future experiments to address open questions raised in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Hör
- Institute of Molecular Infection Biology, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Gianluca Matera
- Institute of Molecular Infection Biology, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Vogel
- Helmholtz Institute for RNA-based Infection Research (HIRI), 97080 Würzburg, Germany
- Institute of Molecular Infection Biology, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Susan Gottesman
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Gisela Storz
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD 20892
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Song S, Wood TK. Toxin/Antitoxin System Paradigms: Toxins Bound to Antitoxins Are Not Likely Activated by Preferential Antitoxin Degradation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 4:e1900290. [PMID: 32293143 DOI: 10.1002/adbi.201900290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Periodically, a scientific field should examine its early premises. For ubiquitous toxin/antitoxin (TA) systems, several initial paradigms require adjustment based on accumulated data. For example, it is now clear that under physiological conditions, there is little evidence that toxins of TA systems cause cell death and little evidence that TA systems cause persistence. Instead, TA systems are utilized to reduce metabolism during stress, inhibit phages, stabilize genetic elements, and influence biofilm formation (bacterial cells attached via an extracellular matrix). In this essay, it is argued that toxins bound to antitoxins are not likely to become activated by preferential antitoxin degradation but instead, de novo toxin synthesis in the absence of stoichiometric amounts of antitoxin activates toxins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sooyeon Song
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802-4400, USA
| | - Thomas K Wood
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802-4400, USA
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Gupta AK, Siddiqui N, Yadav D, Arora L, Dutta T. Regulation of RyeA/SraC expression in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2019; 516:661-665. [PMID: 31248592 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.06.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Small RNAs (sRNAs) play a central role in regulating almost all physiological processes in bacteria. Majority of those sRNAs base pair with their targets and modulate their expressions. RyeA, previously known as SraC in Escherichia coli, is transcribed from a DNA strand complementary to the one from which another stationary phase induced sRNA RyeB/SdsR is synthesised. RyeA and RyeB in the stationary phase constitute a toxin-antitoxin system where RyeA normalizes accumulation of RyeB toxin by acting as RNA sponge. Aside from that, no more information is known about the regulation of RyeA expression. In the current study, we have systematically investigated the regulation of RyeA expression in different growth phases, and identified that RyeA expression is regulated neither by stationary phase-specific σ-factor nor by RNA chaperon Hfq. A dual function ribonuclease RNase BN mitigate its expression in the exponential phase. Thus, deletion of rbn gene promoted the stability of RyeA in the exponential phase. Conversely, RyeB in the stationary phase act as RNA decoy leading to RyeA degradation, and consequently, the preclusion of RyeB in the E. coli genome elevated RyeA. These regulatory mechanisms will help identify the primary role of RyeA in E. coli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Kumar Gupta
- RNA Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India
| | - Namra Siddiqui
- RNA Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India
| | - Divya Yadav
- RNA Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India
| | - Laxmi Arora
- RNA Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India
| | - Tanmay Dutta
- RNA Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Lee S, Kim W, Choi JS, Jang S, Lim HM, Lee Y. Tandem Promoters for Expression of Cnu, a Nucleoid Protein, in
Escherichia coli. B KOREAN CHEM SOC 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/bkcs.11817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Seol‐Hoon Lee
- Department of ChemistryKAIST Daejeon 34141 South Korea
- Division of Chemistry·Cosmetic ScienceDongduk Women's University Seoul 02748 South Korea
| | - Wonkyong Kim
- Department of ChemistryKAIST Daejeon 34141 South Korea
| | - Jee Soo Choi
- Department of ChemistryKAIST Daejeon 34141 South Korea
| | - Seonghui Jang
- Department of ChemistryKAIST Daejeon 34141 South Korea
| | - Heon Man Lim
- Department of BiologyChungnam National University Daejon 34134 South Korea
| | - Younghoon Lee
- Department of ChemistryKAIST Daejeon 34141 South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Reprogramming of gene expression in Escherichia coli cultured on pyruvate versus glucose. Mol Genet Genomics 2019; 294:1359-1371. [PMID: 31363904 DOI: 10.1007/s00438-019-01597-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Previous studies revealed important roles of small RNAs (sRNAs) in regulation of bacterial metabolism, stress responses and virulence. However, only a minor fraction of sRNAs is well characterized with respect to the spectra of their targets, conditional expression profiles and actual mechanisms they use to regulate gene expression to control particular biological pathways. To learn more about the specific contribution of sRNAs to the global regulatory network controlling the Escherichia coli central carbon metabolism (CCM), we employed microarray analysis and compared transcriptome profiles of E. coli cells grown on two alternative minimal media supplemented with either pyruvate or glucose, respectively. Microarray analysis revealed that utilization of these alternative carbon sources led to profound differences in gene expression affecting all major gene clusters associated with CCM as well as expression of several known (CyaR, RyhB, GcvB and RyeA) and putative (C0652) sRNAs. To assess the impact of transcriptional reprogramming of gene expression on E. coli protein abundance, we also employed two-dimensional protein gel electrophoresis. Our experimental data made it possible to determine the major pathways for pyruvate assimilation when it is used as a sole carbon source and reveal the impact of other key processes (i.e., energy production, molecular transport and cell resistance to stress) associated with the CCM in E. coli. Moreover, some of these processes were apparently controlled by GcvB, RyhB and CyaR at the post-transcriptional level, thus indicating the complexity and interconnection of the regulatory networks that control CCM in bacteria.
Collapse
|
58
|
Coordinate regulation of the expression of SdsR toxin and its downstream pphA gene by RyeA antitoxin in Escherichia coli. Sci Rep 2019; 9:9627. [PMID: 31270363 PMCID: PMC6610125 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45998-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In Escherichia coli, SdsR and RyeA, a unique pair of mutually cis-encoded small RNAs (sRNAs), act as toxin and antitoxin, respectively. SdsR and RyeA expression are reciprocally regulated; however, how each regulates the synthesis of the other remains unclear. Here, we characterized the biosynthesis of the two sRNAs during growth and investigated their coordinate regulation using sdsR and ryeA promoter mutant strains. We found that RyeA transcription occurred even upon entry of cells into the stationary phase, but its apparent expression was restricted to exponentially growing cells because of its degradation by SdsR. Likewise, the appearance of SdsR was delayed owing to its RyeA-mediated degradation. We also found that the sdsR promoter was primarily responsible for transcription of the downstream pphA gene encoding a phosphatase and that pphA mRNA was synthesized by transcriptional read-through over the sdsR terminator. Transcription from the σ70-dependent ryeA promoter inhibited transcription from the σS-dependent sdsR promoter through transcriptional interference. This transcriptional inhibition also downregulated pphA expression, but RyeA itself did not downregulate pphA expression.
Collapse
|