Henderson TR, Franks W. Peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery: prilocaine versus lignocaine and bupivacaine.
Eye (Lond) 1996;
10 ( Pt 4):497-500. [PMID:
8944106 DOI:
10.1038/eye.1996.109]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE
Prilocaine has recently been introduced for use in ocular local anaesthesia. A prospective randomised double-masked study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of prilocaine 2% plain versus a mixture of lignocaine 1% and bupivacaine 0.5%, each with hyaluronidase.
METHODS
Seventy-five patients were recruited. Local anaesthetic was given by a two-injection transconjunctival peribulbar technique. Injection and perioperative pain were graded by visual analogue pain score (range 0-10). Akinesia and orbicularis function were graded by the surgeon.
RESULTS
The two anaesthetic mixtures were comparable in efficacy in producing anaesthesia and akinesia. Using the Mann-Whitney U-test for significance, pain of injection ranked as a mean of 0.88 for prilocaine and 1.03 for lignocaine and bupivacaine (p = 0.48, U = 635.5) Perioperative pain was ranked as a mean of 1.17 for prilocaine and 0.91 for lignocaine and bupivacaine (p = 0.41, U = 629.0).
CONCLUSIONS
Prilocaine is a useful alternative anaesthetic agent for eye surgery that has low toxicity and is effective without adrenaline.
Collapse