Preoperative chemotherapy in advanced resectable OCSCC: long-term results of a randomized phase III trial

Prospective applications of microRNAs in oral cancer

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding RNA molecules that are generally encoded by endogenous genes and exert suppressive effects on post-transcriptional regulation of their target genes by translation repression or degradation of mRNA. This subsequently mediates activation or blocking of downstream signaling pathways associated with oral malignancies. Aberrant levels of certain miRNAs have been identified in cell experiments, clinical carcinomatous specimens, saliva, serum or plasma samples of patients with oral malignancies. miRNAs are associated with multiple aspects of oral cancer, including tumor growth, cellular proliferation, apoptosis, migration, invasion, metastasis, glycometabolism, radiosensitivity and chemosensitivity. miRNAs have the potential to be used in clinical applications as minimally invasive or non-invasive tools for early diagnosis and prognosis by the detection of serum, plasma and saliva levels, and may provide a new ancillary or additional reference index of traditional pathological grading and clinical staging. Furthermore, miRNAs may be used as prognostic biomarkers or targets for novel therapies for oral cancer.

Evidence mapping and quality assessment of systematic reviews on therapeutic interventions for oral cancer

Purpose

This evidence mapping aims to describe and assess the quality of available evidence in systematic reviews (SRs) on treatments for oral cancer.

Materials and methods

We followed the methodology of Global Evidence Mapping. Searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Epistemonikos and The Cochrane Library were conducted to identify SRs on treatments for oral cancer. The methodological quality of SRs was assessed using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 tool. We organized the results according to identified Population–Intervention–Comparison–Outcome (PICO) questions and presented the evidence mapping in tables and a bubble plot.

Results

Fifteen SRs met the eligibility criteria, including 118 individual reports, of which 55.1% were randomized controlled clinical trials. Ten SRs scored “Critically low” methodological quality. We extracted 30 PICOs focusing on interventions such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy; 18 PICOs were for resectable oral cancer, of which 8 were reported as beneficial. There were 12 PICOs for unresectable oral cancer, of which only 2 interventions were reported as beneficial.

Conclusion

There is limited available evidence on treatments for oral cancer. The methodological quality of most included SRs scored “Critically low”. The main beneficial treatment reported by authors for patients with resectable oral cancer is surgery alone or in combination with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Evidence about the benefits of the treatments for unresectable oral cancer is lacking. These findings highlight the need to address future research focused on new treatments and knowledge gaps in this field, and increased efforts are required to improve the methodology quality and reporting process of SRs on treatments for oral cancer.

Oral cancers: Current status

Oral cancer is a global disease. Despite a well elucidated tumour progression model, these cancers present late. Attempts at early detection by way of adjunctive diagnostic technologies and screening have not lived up to expectations in spite initial promise. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Treatment intensification by way of adjuvant radiation/chemo radiation is warranted for those with high risk features. Recent studies have explored intensification in those with intermediate risk factors in an attempt to improve outcomes. There has been generation of recent robust evidence that has influenced the need and extent of neck dissection. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) may have a potential role in organ preservation and borderline resectable oral cancers. Recurrent tumours should be offered surgery whenever feasible while the addition of biological agents to chemotherapy gives best results in the palliative settings.

Predictors of Early Recurrence Prior to Planned Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Outcomes Following Salvage Intensified Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

To determine predictors and outcomes for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients who had early recurrence before commencement of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT).

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed for patients with OSCC treated with PORT between 2003 and 2015 after curative-intent surgery. Early recurrence was defined as tumor recurrence after surgical resection and before initiating planned PORT. Patients were classified into the following groups: (1) adjuvant PORT group (no early recurrence), (2) salvage PORT group (locoregional early recurrence), and (3) palliative PORT group (locoregional and distant early recurrence). For the whole cohort, multivariable analysis (MVA) was applied to identify predictors of early recurrence. In the salvage group, the post-PORT recurrence-free rate was estimated, and MVA was used to identify predictors of recurrence-free rate, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Six hundred and one patients were identified, of whom 513 (85%) were treated with adjuvant PORT. Eighty-eight patients (15%) had early recurrence (28 of 88; 32% were biopsy proven) before PORT (70 in the salvage group and 18 in the palliative group). On MVA, oral tongue subsite, microscopic positive resection margin, pT3-4, and pN2-3 were associated with the development of early recurrence (P < .05 for all). The 3-year OS rates for patients with OSCC treated with adjuvant and salvage PORT were 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-75%) and 41% (95% CI, 30%-56%), respectively (P < .001; median follow-up was 3.4 and 2.9 years, respectively). After salvage PORT, the 3-year recurrence-free rate was 36% (95% CI, 23%-47%). On MVA, extranodal extension and volume of early recurrent gross disease were associated with poor recurrence-free rate, disease-free survival, and OS (P < .05 for all).

CONCLUSION

Early recurrences are not uncommon in patients with high-risk features, Further study is required to improve prediction and outcomes of this very high-risk group.

Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: role, controversy, and future directions

Background

The value of induction chemotherapy (ICT) remains under investigation despite decades of research. New advancements in the field, specifically regarding the induction regimen of choice, have reignited interest in this approach for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN). Sufficient evidence has accumulated regarding the benefits and superiority of TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil) over the chemotherapy doublet cisplatin and fluorouracil. We therefore sought to collate and interpret the available data and further discuss the considerations for delivering ICT safely and optimally selecting suitable post-ICT regimens.

Design

We nonsystematically reviewed published phase III clinical trials on TPF ICT in a variety of LA SCCHN patient populations conducted between 1990 and 2017.

Results

TPF may confer survival and organ preservation benefits in a subgroup of patients with functionally inoperable or poor-prognosis LA SCCHN. Additionally, patients with operable disease or good prognosis (who are not candidates for organ preservation) may benefit from TPF induction in terms of reducing local and distant failure rates and facilitating treatment deintensification in selected populations. The safe administration of TPF requires treatment by a multidisciplinary team at an experienced institution. The management of adverse events associated with TPF and post-ICT radiotherapy-based treatment is crucial. Finally, post-ICT chemotherapy alternatives to cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy (i.e. cetuximab or carboplatin plus radiotherapy) appear promising and must be investigated further.

Conclusions

TPF is an evidence-based ICT regimen of choice in LA SCCHN and confers benefits in suitable patients when it is administered safely by an experienced multidisciplinary team and paired with the optimal post-ICT regimen, for which, however, no consensus currently exists.

Locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with photobiomodulation for prevention of oral mucositis: retrospective outcomes and safety analyses

PURPOSE

The well-established clinical efficacy of photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy in management of oral mucositis (OM) is leading to increasing use in oncology care. This protection and enhanced repair of damage to mucosal tissue have led to the question of the potential effects of PBM therapy on pre-malignant and malignant cells. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of cancer therapy and incidence of tumor recurrence in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients treated with PBM therapy for OM.

METHODS

A retrospective clinical analysis of 152 advanced OSCC patients treated with prophylactic PBM therapy for radiotherapy-induced OM from January 2009 to December 2014 was conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 152 OSCC patients treated with PBM therapy in this study, 19 (12.5%) had stage III and 133 (87.5%) had stage IV tumors. Of these, 52 (34.2%) received initial treatment with surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, 94 (61.8%) with exclusive chemoradiation, and 6 (4%) with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery and radiotherapy. After a mean follow-up of 40.84 (± 11.71) months, the overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 46.7 and 51.8%, respectively. Forty-five (29.6%) patients developed local-regional recurrence, 10 (6.57%) patients developed distant relapse, and 19 (12.5%) developed new (second) primary tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in the PBM-treated patients were similar to previously published data for conventional treatments in patients with advanced OSCC. In this study, prophylactic use of PBM therapy did not impact treatment outcomes of the primary cancer, recurrence or new primary tumors, or survival in advanced OSCC patients.

Rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The clinical benefit of immunotherapy in recurrent, metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma has fueled interest in revisiting neoadjuvant approaches to complement definitive treatment. Neoadjuvant strategies incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors and other novel immune-based therapies in head and neck cancer are reviewed here, with particular attention paid to the rationale for these approaches from both a clinical and biologic discovery standpoint. The potential benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy include reduction of extent of surgery and the intensity of adjuvant therapy by tumor downstaging, reduction of the risk of distant metastatic spread by early introduction of systemic therapy, conversion of unresectable to resectable disease, and early evaluation of biomarkers of tumor response. We await early trial results utilizing these approaches to confirm both safety and initial efficacy in head and neck cancer.

Concurrent preoperative chemotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy followed by surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 104 cases

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to assess the clinical effects of an integrated program consisting of concurrent preoperative combined paclitaxel and nedaplatin chemotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy followed by surgery intended to cure oral squamous cell carcinoma and to determine whether this integrated program is feasible and effective with respect to the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

A total of 104 biopsy-confirmed patients who presented with oral squamous cell carcinoma for the first time were included in this study. Concurrent preoperative combined paclitaxel and nedaplatin chemotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy were administered to these patients. The most common treatment regimen consisted of infusions of paclitaxel (135-175 mg/m²/day), infusions of nedaplatin (150 mg; 80-100 mg/m²/day), and irradiation at doses ranging from 1.5 Gy twice daily to 30-40 Gy over 3-4 weeks. The clinical variables evaluated herein included the local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, postoperative survival rate, and degree of mouth opening restriction.

Results

The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 60 months, and the median time to progression for all patients was 57.69 months (95% confidence interval, 56.09 to 59.29 months, and the 3-year disease-free survival probability was 97.11%). The effectiveness rate of the integrated program was 98.08%, and the surgery resection rate was 100%. Only a few postoperative adverse reactions were observed. The local recurrence and distant metastasis rates were 1.92% (2 patients) and 2.88% (3 patients), respectively. The titanium rejection and infection reaction rate that led to restriction of mouth opening was only 2.88% (3 patients). Finally, the 5-year post-surgery survival rate was 91.35% (95 patients).

Conclusion

Preoperative combined paclitaxel and nedaplatin chemotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy have significant clinical effects leading to positive anti-tumor results in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. These treatments also increase the likelihood that patients will undergo successful surgical treatment. The integrated program described herein can increase long-term survival and surgery resection rates and is associated with only a limited number of adverse reactions.

Induction Chemotherapy in Technically Unresectable Locally Advanced T4a Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Cancers: Experience from a Regional Cancer Center of South India

Objectives:

The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy, toxicity, and impact of induction chemotherapy (IC) in technically unresectable T4a oral cavity squamous cell cancers (OSCCs).

Materials and Methods:

Patients diagnosed with technically unresectable locally advanced T4a OSCC from January 2013 and November 2016 at our center, who received 2–3 cycles of IC and then assessed for resectability, were reviewed retrospectively. Patients' profile, response rates and toxicity of IC, resectability status, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results:

Totally 80 patients received IC, and of them 58 (72.5%) were males. Median age at diagnosis was 44 years (range, 34–62 years). All our patients received IC with doublet regimen. Majority of the patients had buccal mucosa cancers (73.8%), followed by gingivobuccal complex (21.2%) and oral tongue (5%) primaries. After IC, partial response was achieved in 17 (21.3%) patients, stable disease in 49 (61.3%) patients and disease progression was noted in 14 (17.4%) patients. Post-IC, resectability was achieved in 19 (23.8%) of 80 patients, but 4 of them did not undergo surgery due to logistic and personal reasons. The median OS of patients who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant local therapy (n = 15) was 16.9 months (95% CI: 15.2–19.8 months) and for those treated with nonsurgical local therapy (n = 65) was 8.8 months (95% CI: 6.8–10.6 months) (log-rank P = 0.000).

Conclusions:

IC had a manageable toxicity profile and achieved resectability in 23.8% of our patients with technically unresectable T4a OSCC. Patients underwent resection had a significantly better median OS than those who received nonsurgical local treatment.

Induction chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity: A cumulative meta-analysis

Induction chemotherapy (ICT) is a controversial treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Despite numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs), a majority do not have enough statistical power alone to conclude ICT's treatment value among oral squamous carcinoma patients (OSCC) since many addressed HNSCC as one entity instead of by specific subtypes. By performing a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis, we aim to determine the benefits of ICT in OSCC therapy. A literature search identified for RCTs comparing OSCC patients who received ICT against those without. Log-hazard ratio, and relative risk were used for comparison. Heterogeneity was determined using the I(2) statistic package. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), followed by disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastasis (DM) as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

27 randomized trials were included for analysis (n=2872 patients). The shortest median follow-up was 15months whereas the longest was 11.5years. ICT does not improve OS (HR=0.947, 95% CI 0.85-1.05, p=0.318), DFS (RR=1.05, 95% CI 0.92-1.21, p=0.462) and DM (RR=0.626, CI 95% 0.361-1.086, p=0.096) compared to locoregional treatment alone. However, there was a significant improvement to LRR (RR=0.778, 95% CI 0.622-0.972, p=0.027). There is no evidence ICT improves survival outcomes for OSCC patients. However, ICT reduces locoregional recurrence of OSCC, which may need further verification.

Long-term results of a randomized phase III trial of TPF induction chemotherapy followed by surgery and radiation in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma

Previously, we conducted a randomized phase III trial of TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) induction chemotherapy in surgically managed locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and found no improvement in overall survival. This study reports long-term follow-up results from our initial trial. All patients had clinical stage III or IVA locally advanced OSCC. In the experimental group, patients received two cycles of TPF induction chemotherapy (75mg/m² docetaxel d1, 75mg/m² cisplatin d1, and 750mg/m²/day 5-fluorouracil d1-5) followed by radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy; in the control group, patients received upfront radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Among 256 enrolled patients with a median follow-up of 70 months, estimated 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 61.1%, 52.7%, 55.2%, and 60.4%, respectively. There were no significant differences in survival rates between experimental and control groups. However, patients with favorable pathologic responses had improved outcomes compared to those with unfavorable pathologic responses and to those in the control group. Although TPF induction chemotherapy did not improve long-term survival compared to surgery upfront in patients with stage III and IVA OSCC, a favorable pathologic response after induction chemotherapy may be used as a major endpoint and prognosticator in future studies. Furthermore, the negative results observed in this trial may be represent type II error from an underpowered study. Future larger scale phase III trials are warranted to investigate whether a significant benefit exists for TPF induction chemotherapy in surgically managed OSCC.

Induction chemotherapy prior to surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy for oral cavity cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Locoregionally advanced oral cavity cancers are aggressive tumours with high risk of relapse after definitive treatment. This study was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of induction chemotherapy prior to surgery for untreated oral cavity cancer patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Only prospective phase III randomised studies comparing induction chemotherapy followed by surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy (Chemo Group) compared with surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy (Control Group) were eligible. Two of the authors independently selected and assessed the studies regarding eligibility criteria and risk of bias.

RESULTS

Two studies were selected. A total of 451 patients were randomly assigned to Chemo Group (n=226) versus Control Group (n=225). Most patients had tumours at clinical stages III/IV (89.1%). Both trials were classified as having low risk of bias. No significant overall benefit in favour of induction chemotherapy was found regarding loco-regional recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival. A subgroup analysis of individual data from cN2 patients showed statistically significant overall survival benefit in favour of induction chemotherapy. The included studies did not directly compare toxicity between the groups and no statistical analysis was performed regarding safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available studies, induction chemotherapy when administered before surgery with curative intent did not improve clinical outcomes in locoregionally advanced oral cavity cancer patients. Clinically assessed N2 patients might benefit from induction chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oral cancers: Selecting the right patients

The standard of care treatment for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) at present, consist of surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy as indicated. Despite recent advances the overall prognosis remains guarded. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being explored with premise of reducing extent of surgical resection, improving loco-regional control and decreasing distant metastasis, thereby improving treatment outcomes by decreasing mortality and morbidity. However, indications of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oral cancers are not clearly defined. Majority of studies have failed to demonstrate a significant benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in terms of loco regional control and overall survival in resectable OSCC. In a select subset of patients with locally very advanced and unresectable OSCC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to cause tumor shrinkage and improve resectability. These hypothesis generating findings of reduction in distant metastasis, improved resectability and functional outcome, however need further validation. In summary, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for OSCC remains investigational and has a limited role outside clinical trial.