Use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for the documentation of synergy between tramadol and metamizol

A comparative study on the analgesic effect of tramadol, tramadol plus magnesium, and tramadol plus ketamine for postoperative pain management after major abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

We tested whether, after major abdominal surgery, the addition of magnesium or ketamine to tramadol for intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) improved analgesia and lowered pain scores, compared to a PCA containing only tramadol.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients were allocated randomly to receive a PCA with tramadol alone (T), tramadol plus magnesium (TM) or tramadol plus ketamin (TK), in a double-blind randomized study. Postoperative analgesia was started when the verbal rating scale (VRS) score was 2 or more. Following a loading dose of the study solution (which contained 1 mg/kg tramadol), a background infusion of 0.4 mg/kg/h was started. Patients were allowed to use bolus doses of 0.2 mg/kg every 20 min without a time limit. Discomfort, sedation, pain scores, total and bolus PCA tramadol consumption, and side-effects, were recorded for up to 24 h after the start of PCA.

RESULTS

Pain and discomfort scores were lower (P < 0.01) in groups TM and TK at 15, 30, 60 and 120 min than in group T. The addition of magnesium or ketamine significantly reduced the consumption of tramadol at 6, 12 and 24 h (P < 0.01). The incidence of nausea did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Adding magnesium or ketamine to tramadol improved analgesia and patient comfort and decreased the amount of tramadol required for postoperative pain management after major abdominal surgery.

Metamizol potentiates morphine antinociception but not constipation after chronic treatment

This work evaluates the antinociceptive and constipating effects of the combination of 3.2 mg/kg s.c. morphine with 177.8 mg/kg s.c. metamizol in acutely and chronically treated (once a day for 12 days) rats. On the 13th day, antinociceptive effects were assessed using a model of inflammatory nociception, pain-induced functional impairment model, and the charcoal meal test was used to evaluate the intestinal transit. Simultaneous administration of morphine with metamizol resulted in a markedly antinociceptive potentiation and an increasing of the duration of action after a single (298+/-7 vs. 139+/-36 units area (ua); P<0.001) and repeated administration (280+/-17 vs. 131+/-22 ua; P<0.001). Antinociceptive effect of morphine was reduced in chronically treated rats (39+/-10 vs. 18+/-5 au) while the combination-induced antinociception was remained similar as an acute treatment (298+/-7 vs. 280+/-17 au). Acute antinociceptive effects of the combination were partially prevented by 3.2 mg/kg naloxone s.c. (P<0.05), suggesting the partial involvement of the opioidergic system in the synergism observed. In independent groups, morphine inhibited the intestinal transit in 48+/-4% and 38+/-4% after acute and chronic treatment, respectively, suggesting that tolerance did not develop to the constipating effects. The combination inhibited intestinal transit similar to that produced by morphine regardless of the time of treatment, suggesting that metamizol did not potentiate morphine-induced constipation. These findings show a significant interaction between morphine and metamizol in chronically treated rats, suggesting that this combination could be useful for the treatment of chronic pain.

Tramadol has no effect on cortical renal blood flow--despite increased serum catecholamine levels--in anesthetized rats: implications for analgesia in renal insufficiency

Tramadol is an analgesic that inhibits norepinephrine (NE) reuptake. Although NE released from renal sympathetic nerves causes renal hypoperfusion, the effects of tramadol on renal hemodynamics have not been well characterized. We investigated the effects of tramadol on renal blood flow (RBF), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) by using a laser Doppler flowmeter, both in normal anesthetized rats and in rats with experimentally-induced nephritis secondary to anti-Thy 1.1 antibody administration. We also studied the effects of tramadol on serum NE levels. Tramadol increased MAP and decreased HR without changing RBF in normal rats at clinical doses. Serum NE levels increased up to 176% of control after a 2 mg/kg bolus injection of tramadol. Continuously infused, increasing doses of tramadol (0.5-4 mg.kg(-1).h(-1)) did not affect MAP, HR, or RBF. Tramadol also increased MAP and decreased HR without changing RBF in rats with experimentally induced renal insufficiency. These findings suggest that a bolus injection of tramadol does not alter RBF, although it causes a decrease in HR and an increase in MAP and serum NE in both normal rats and in rats with renal insufficiency. These results suggest that tramadol may have little effect on RBF during the postoperative period.

IMPLICATIONS

A bolus and continuous injection of tramadol does not alter renal blood flow (RBF) in normal rats. A bolus injection of tramadol has little effect on RBF in rats with experimentally induced renal insufficiency. These results suggest that tramadol would be a safe analgesic for maintaining RBF during the postoperative period.

Lidocaine with fentanyl, compared to morphine, marginally improves postoperative epidural analgesia in children

PURPOSE

To compare the epidural administration of fentanyl (1 microg/mL) combined with lidocaine 0.4% to preservative-free morphine for postoperative analgesia and side effects in children undergoing major orthopedic surgery.

METHODS

In a prospective, double-blind study, 30 children, ASA I-II, 2-16-yr-old, were randomly allocated to receive immediately after surgery either epidural F-L (epidural infusion at a rate of 0.1-0.35 mL/kg/hr of 1 microg/mL of fentanyl and lidocaine 0.4%) or epidural M (bolus of 20 microg/kg of morphine in 0.5 mL/kg saline every eight hours). Both groups received 40 mg/kg of iv metamizol (dipyrone) every six hours. In the F-L Group, blood samples were taken on the second and third postoperative day to determine total lidocaine concentrations. Adequacy of analgesia using adapted pediatric pain scales (0-10 score) and side-effects were assessed every eight hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

Resting pain scores were under 4, 95% of the time in the F-L Group and 87% of the time in the M Group (Chi square=4.674, P <0.05). The frequency of complications was very similar in both groups. The F-L Group total plasma lidocaine concentrations were directly related to the dose received, and below the toxic range in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative epidural fentanyl with lidocaine infusion provides slightly better analgesia than conventional bolus administration of epidural morphine. Side-effects or risk of systemic toxicity were not augmented by the addition of lidocaine to epidural opioids.