A comprehensive analysis of the effects of rivaroxaban on stroke or transient ischaemic attack in patients with heart failure, coronary artery disease, and sinus rhythm: the COMMANDER HF trial

Prevalence, Mechanisms, and Management of Ischemic Stroke in Heart Failure Patients

Heart failure (HF) and stroke, two of the major causes of death worldwide, are closely associated. Although atrial fibrillation (AF), which occurs in more than half of patients with HF, is a major risk factor for stroke, there is a great deal of evidence that HF itself increases the risk of stroke independent of AF. The main mechanism of stroke appears to be thromboembolism. However, previous studies have failed to demonstrate the benefit of warfarin in patients with HF without AF, as the benefit of stroke prevention was counteracted by the increased incidence of major bleeding. Recently, researchers have identified patients with HF at a particularly high risk for stroke who may benefit from anticoagulation therapy. Based on stroke-risk prediction models, it may be possible to make better stroke prevention decisions for patients with HF. Moreover, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants have emerged as anticoagulants with a more favorable risk-benefit profile than warfarin. Future studies on selecting high-risk patients and using more appropriate antithrombotics will lead to improved management of patients with HF.

Thromboembolism in Heart Failure Patients in Sinus Rhythm: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Trials, and Future Direction

Despite advances in medical and device therapy, patients with heart failure remain at high risk for morbidity and mortality. Experimental and clinical studies have shown an association between heart failure and a hypercoagulable state, and that patients with heart failure experience an increased incidence of stroke and other thromboembolic events, regardless of whether they are in atrial fibrillation. Although oral anticoagulation is recommended when atrial fibrillation is present, the benefits of this therapy in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm are uncertain. Older randomized controlled trials comparing warfarin with antiplatelet therapy were, for the most part, underpowered and failed to show convincing benefits of warfarin therapy in this population. Several recent studies that assessed the effects of low-dose direct-acting oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary artery disease in sinus rhythm either included or specifically targeted patients with heart failure. Post hoc analysis of their results showed that this treatment strategy was associated with improved outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary artery disease and also a significant reduction in thromboembolic events, including ischemic stroke. This review presents the rationale for anticoagulant therapy in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm, discusses gaps in our knowledge base, offers suggestions for when anticoagulation might be considered, and identifies potential directions for future research.

Heart failure re-hospitalizations and subsequent fatal events in coronary artery disease: insights from COMMANDER-HF, EPHESUS, and EXAMINE

BACKGROUND

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are at increased risk of developing and being hospitalised for heart failure (HFH). However, the risk of HFH versus ischemic events may vary among patients with CAD, depending on whether acute myocardial infarction (MI), left ventricular dysfunction or decompensated HF is present at baseline.

AIMS

We aim to explore the risk of non-fatal events (HFH, MI, stroke) and subsequent death in 3 landmark trials, COMMANDER-HF, EPHESUS and EXAMINE that, together, included patients with CAD with and without reduced ejection fraction and acute MI.

METHODS

Events, person-time metrics and time-updated Cox models.

RESULTS

In COMMANDER-HF the event-rate for the composite of AMI, stroke or all-cause death was 13.5 (12.8-14.3) events/100 py. Rates for AMI and stroke were much lower (2.2 [2.0-2.6] and 1.3 [1.1-1.6] events/100 py, respectively) than the rate of HFH (16.9 [16.1-17.9] events/100 py). In EPHESUS, the rates of MI and stroke were also lower than the rate of HFH: 7.2 (6.7-7.8), 1.9 (1.7-2.3), and 10.6 (9.9-11.3) events/100 py, but this was not true for EXAMINE with 4.4 (4.0-4.9), 0.7 (0.6-0.9), and 2.4 (2.0-2.7) events/100 py, respectively. In all 3 trials, a non-fatal event (HFH, MI or stroke) during follow-up doubled the risk of subsequent mortality. This most commonly followed a HFH.

CONCLUSIONS

A first or recurrent HFH is common in patients with CAD and AMI or HFrEF and indicates a poor prognosis. Preventing the development of heart failure after AMI and control of congestion in patients with CAD and HFrEF are key unmet needs and therapeutic targets.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01877915. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01877915 .

Ischemic Stroke and Heart Failure: Facts and Numbers. An Update

Heart failure (HF) is a severe clinical syndrome accompanied by a number of comorbidities. Ischemic stroke occurs frequently in patients with HF as a complication of the disease. In the present review, we aimed to summarize the current state of research on the role of cardio–cerebral interactions in the prevalence, etiology, and prognosis of both diseases. The main pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the development of stroke in HF and vice versa are discussed. In addition, we reviewed the results of recent clinical trials investigating the prevalence and prevention of stroke in patients with HF.

Risks of Ischemic Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack Based on CHA2DS2-VASc Scores in Non-Atrial Fibrillation Chinese Patients with Sinus Rhythm

This study aims to evaluate the incidence of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) based on CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores in non-AF Chinese patients with sinus rhythm.We used health check-up data of 101,510 participants from the Kailuan Cohort Study. Participants' risk levels were defined by their CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores (range 0-3): Men with scores of 0, 1, or ≥ 2 and women with scores of 1, 2, or ≥ 3 were considered at low, intermediate, or high risk, respectively. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association between the CHA₂DS₂-VASc-determined risk and the incidence of ischemic stroke/TIA.The mean 7.5 year follow-up examination revealed 2968 ischemic strokes/TIA events. The incidence rates for ischemic stroke/TIA events in men and women were 3.8% and 1.5%, respectively. The incidence of ischemic stroke/TIA increased with elevated predicted risks based on CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores in men: 2.2% for low-risk, 4.1% for intermediate-risk, and 7.8% for high-risk groups (P < 0.001 for trend). The incidences of ischemic stroke/TIA also increased with elevated predicted risks in women: 0.8% for low-risk, 2.1% for intermediate-risk, and 5.0% for high-risk groups (P < 0.001 for trend). Compared with low-risk group, the crude hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of ischemic stroke/TIA for men in moderate- and high-risk groups were 1.96 (1.79-2.14; P < 0.001) and 4.18 (3.81-4.57; P < 0.001). Similar findings were observed in women.Risks of ischemic stroke/TIA events was high, particularly among those with high CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores.

Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Ischemic Stroke: Risk Factors, Prognosis, Unresolved Problems and Possible Methods of Prevention

The present work is devoted to the analysis of modern publications on various aspects of the development and course of ischemic stroke in the presence of acute myocardial infarction. A literature search was conducted on the websites of cardiological and neurological societies, as well as on the PubMed, EMBASE, eLibrary databases using the keywords: myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, acute cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke. The authors of this review found that although stroke is a relatively rare complication of myocardial infarction, its prevention is an extremely significant task, since it is associated with high mortality, disability and a significant increase in the cost of treatment. So, it is extremely important to detect thrombosis of the left ventricular cavity in a timely manner, to register preexisting atrial fibrillation that occurs earlier or for the first time, followed by the appointment of anticoagulant therapy. Timely reperfusion treatment, the use of statins and modern dual antithrombotic therapy can reduce the risk of developing cerebrovascular accident in patients with myocardial infarction. It is likely that a decrease in the activity of subclinical inflammation after myocardial infarction will also reduce the risk of stroke, as was recently shown in the COLCOT study. Currently, it remains relevant to search for new knowledge about the risk factors for stroke, which complicated the course of myocardial infarction, which will allow developing more effective and personalized preventive measures in a patient with acute coronary syndrome.

Neurological complications of heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a major global cause of death with increasing absolute worldwide numbers of HF patients. HF results from the interaction between cardiovascular aging with specific risk factors, comorbidities, and disease modifiers. The failing heart and neuronal injury have a bidirectional interaction requiring specific management strategies. Decreased cardiac output has been associated with lower brain volumes. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) may normalize following heart transplantation among severe HF patients. Stroke and cognitive impairment remain the main neurologic conditions associated with HF. However, HF patients may also suffer from chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. It seems likely that HF-related ischemic strokes are primarily the result of cardiac embolism. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is present in half of stroke patient with HF. The increased risk of hemorrhagic strokes is less well characterized and likely multifactorial, but may in part reflect a higher use of long-term antithrombotic therapy. The steady improvement of neuroimaging techniques has demonstrated an increased prevalence of silent ischemic lesions among HF patients. The populations most likely to benefit from long-term anticoagulant therapy are HF patients with AF. Cognitive impairment in HF can have a variety of clinical manifestations from mild memory problems to dementia.

Clinical profile and midterm prognosis of left ventricular thrombus in heart failure

Aims

We documented the midterm prognosis of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) in heart failure (HF) patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). We aimed to characterize patients with LVT in the context of HF with reduced (≤40%) left ventricular ejection fraction and evaluate their risk for death and/or embolic events, overall, and specifically in patients with ischaemic or non‐ischaemic aetiology. We also intended to identify risk factors for LVT in patients with DCM.

Methods and results

We included all HF patients (N = 105, age 56 ± 13) admitted from 2005 to 2018 in our institution for LVT without significant valve disease/prosthesis, heart transplant/left ventricular assist device, congenital heart disease, or acute myocardial infarction. Our primary endpoint was the 1 year risk of the composite of all‐cause mortality (ACM) and symptomatic embolic events. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 23 ± 9%, and median BNP was 1795 pg/mL. Most (97%) patients were treated with vitamin K anticoagulants, and 64% had ICM. Symptomatic embolic events and/or ACM occurred in 20% of the population [embolic events (all within 30 days of LVT diagnosis) 15% and ACM 6%] and was similarly frequent in DCM or ICM (P > 0.05). Suspected/transient embolic events were more frequent in DCM (overall 13%; 29% in DCM vs. 5% in ICM, P < 0.01). Major bleeding occurred in 5% of patients. Left ventricular reverse remodelling occurred in 65% of patients, more frequently in DCM (86% in DCM vs. 65% in ICM, P = 0.02). In a case–control analysis matching DCM patients, BNP level was the only factor significantly associated with LVT (2447 pg/mL in LVT vs. 347 pg/mL, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with LVT have markedly high natriuretic peptides and experience a 20% 1 year risk for embolic events and/or death following diagnosis despite anticoagulant treatment. Most patients have favourable remodelling/recovery. As all symptomatic embolic events occurred within 30 days of LVT diagnosis, a very careful initial management is warranted.

Impact of Geographic Region on the COMMANDER-HF Trial

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare patient characteristics, outcomes, and treatment effects among regions in the COMMANDER-HF trial.

BACKGROUND

Globalization of cardiovascular trials increases generalizability. However, regional differences may also introduce heterogeneity in results.

METHODS

Incidence rates and interactions with treatment were recorded in pre-specified regions: Eastern Europe, Western Europe and South Africa, North America, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.

RESULTS

Most patients (n = 3,224; 64.2%) were from Eastern Europe; 458 (9.1%) were from Western Europe and South Africa; 149 (3.0%) were from North America; 733 (14.6%) were from Asia-Pacific; and 458 (9.1%) were from Latin America. Compared with patients from Eastern Europe, patients from Western Europe and South Africa, North America, and Asia-Pacific were older and more likely to have coronary interventions and cardiac devices. Patients from Eastern Europe had the lowest event rates. For the primary outcome of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or all-cause death, event rates (100/year) were 11.6 in Eastern Europe (10.8 to 12.5); 19.5 (16.5 to 23.0) in Western Europe and South Africa; 14.2 (10.5 to 19.2) in North America; 17.7 (15.4 to 20.3) in Asia-Pacific; and 18.6 (15.6 to 22.1) in Latin America. There was a lower incidence of bleeding in Eastern Europe. Blood concentrations of rivaroxaban (Xarelto, Titusville, New Jersey) at 4 weeks were undetectable in 21% patients from Eastern Europe (n = 128) compared to 5% in other regions (n = 42). There was no evidence of treatment-by-region heterogeneity for the primary outcome (interaction_p = 0.14), but a favorable effect on the secondary outcome of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death was observed in Western Europe and South Africa, North America, and Latin America but not in Eastern Europe and Asia-Pacific (interaction_p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In the COMMANDER-HF study, patients from Eastern Europe had a lower risk profile and fewer cardiovascular and bleeding events, possibly related to lower treatment adherence. Those differences might have influenced the effect of rivaroxaban therapy. (A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Reducing the Risk of Death, Myocardial Infarction or Stroke in Participants With Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Following an Episode of Decompensated Heart Failure [COMMANDER HF]; NCT01877915).

Association of the CHA2D(S2)-VASc Score and Its Components With Overt and Silent Ischemic Brain Lesions in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Silent and overt ischemic brain lesions are common and associated with adverse outcome. Whether the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and its components predict magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected ischemic silent and overt brain lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear.

Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis, patients with AF were enrolled in a multicenter cohort study in Switzerland. Outcomes were clinically overt, silent [in the absence of a history of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA)] and any MRI-detected ischemic brain lesions. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and its components with ischemic brain lesions. An adapted CHA₂D-VASc score (excluding history of stroke/TIA) for the analyses of clinically overt and silent ischemic brain lesions was used.

Results: Overall, 1,741 patients were included in the analysis (age 73 ± 8 years, 27.4% female). At least one ischemic brain lesion was observed in 36.8% (clinically overt: 10.5%; silent: 22.9%; transient ischemic attack: 3.4%). The CHA₂D-VASc score was strongly associated with clinically overt and silent ischemic brain lesions {odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 1.32 (1.17–1.49), p < 0.001 and 1.20 (1.10–1.30), p < 0.001, respectively}. Age 65–74 years (OR 2.58; 95%CI 1.29–5.90; p = 0.013), age ≥75 years (4.13; 2.07–9.43; p < 0.001), hypertension (1.90; 1.28–2.88; p = 0.002) and diabetes (1.48; 1.00–2.18; p = 0.047) were associated with clinically overt brain lesions, whereas age 65–74 years (1.95; 1.26–3.10; p = 0.004), age ≥75 years (3.06; 1.98–4.89; p < 0.001) and vascular disease (1.39; 1.07–1.79; p = 0.012) were associated with silent ischemic brain lesions.

Conclusions: A higher CHA₂D-VASc score was associated with a higher risk of both overt and silent ischemic brain lesions.

Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02105844.

Use of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention across the Stroke Spectrum: Progress and Prospects

Multiple randomized controlled trials and many real-world evidence studies have consistently shown that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are preferable to vitamin K antagonists for thromboembolic stroke prevention in the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, their role in the management of patients with AF and comorbidities, as well as in other patient populations with a high risk of stroke, such as patients with prior embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) and those with atherosclerosis, is less clear. There is now increasing evidence suggesting that NOACs have a beneficial effect in the prevention of stroke in patients with AF and comorbidities, such as renal impairment and diabetes. In addition, while studies investigating the efficacy and safety of NOACs for the prevention of secondary stroke in patients with a history of ESUS demonstrated neutral results, subanalyses suggested potential benefits in certain subgroups of patients with ESUS. One NOAC, rivaroxaban, has also recently been found to be effective in reducing the risk of stroke in patients with chronic cardiovascular disease including coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease, further broadening the patient groups that may benefit from NOACs. In this article, we will review recent evidence for the use of NOACs across the stroke spectrum in detail, and discuss the progress and future prospects in the different stroke areas.

Stroke Prevention After Cryptogenic Stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cryptogenic stroke represents a heterogenous but clinically important collection of stroke etiologies for which our understanding continues to grow. Here, we review our current knowledge and most recent recommendations on secondary prevention for common causes of cryptogenic stroke including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, atrial cardiopathy, patent foramen ovale, and substenotic atherosclerotic disease as well as the under-recognized mechanisms of occult malignancy, heart failure, and, most recently, infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).

RECENT FINDINGS

The results from recent observational studies and randomized clinical trials have provided greater insight into the causal relationship and attributable risk of these suspected etiologies and have identified potential strategies to reduce the rates of recurrence. However, further clinical trials are needed to confirm the benefits of specific stroke prevention strategies, including the patient populations most likely to benefit from anticoagulation. There is ongoing research aimed at both reducing the proportion of ischemic strokes classified as cryptogenic and resolving much of the clinical equipoise that still exists. The results of these studies have the potential to provide us with a better understanding of these occult mechanisms and allow for more targeted interventions.

Neurologic complications of myocarditis

Myocarditis, a nonischemic acquired cardiomyopathy, is an uncommon condition with multiple presentation patterns which may be initially difficult to recognize and may simulate other conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, pericarditis, septicemia, etc. There are four distinct clinical presentation patterns that include: (1) low-grade nonspecific symptoms such as fatigue; (2) symptoms that resemble an acute myocardial infarction, especially in younger individuals; (3) a heart failure presentation which may be acute, subacute, or chronic and may be associated with cardiac conduction system defects and arrhythmias; and (4) an arrhythmia presentation that may produce sudden cardiac death, especially in young athletes with minimal or no prodromal symptoms. This chapter will provide a brief overview of various myocarditis etiologies and diagnostic modalities. The ultimate focus will be directed toward neurologic manifestations of myocarditis and its subtypes, complications of specific therapies including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory heart failure, and review the current literature regarding the appropriate use of therapeutic anticoagulation in myocarditis and heart failure for stroke prevention. Covid-19 infection has been discovered to cause myocarditis. The emerging science will be discussed. Nuances of brain death (BD) determination in patients receiving venoarterial ECMO for heart failure refractory to standard medical therapies will be discussed.

Risk of stroke in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm: data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry

AIMS

We investigated the 2 year rate of ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack (IS) in patients with heart failure (HF) who were in sinus rhythm (HF-SR) and aimed to develop a score for stratifying risk of IS in this population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 15 425 patients (mean age 71.5 years, 39% women) with HF-SR enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Register were included; 28 815 age-matched and sex-matched controls, without a registered diagnosis of HF, were selected from the Swedish Population Register. The 2 year rate of IS was 3.0% in patients and 1.4% in controls. In the patient group, a risk score including age (1p for 65-74 years; 2p for 75-84 years; 3p for ≥85 years), previous IS (2p), ischaemic heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, kidney dysfunction, and New York Heart Association III/IV class (1p each) was generated. Over a mean follow-up of 20.1 (SD 7.5) months, the cumulative incidences (per 1000 person-years) of IS in patients with score 0 to ≥7 were 2.2, 5.3, 8.9, 13.2, 15.7, 20.4, 26.4, and 33.0, with hazard ratios for score 1 to ≥7 (with 0 as reference): 2.4, 4.1, 6.1, 7.2, 9.4, 12.2, and 15.3. The risk score performed modestly (area under the curve 63.7%; P = 0.4711 for lack of fit with a logistic model; P = 0.7062 with Poisson, scaled by deviance).

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of absolute risk, only 27.6% of patients had an annual IS incidence of ≤1%. To which extent this would be amenable to anticoagulant treatment remains conjectural. A score compiling age and specific co-morbidities identified HF-SR patients with increased risk of IS with modest discriminative ability.

Long-Term Risk of Stroke and Poststroke Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure: Two Nationwide Studies

Objective

To evaluate the long-term risk of stroke and poststroke adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods

We used research data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Program from 2000 to 2005 and identified 20,072 adults aged ≥30 years who were newly diagnosed with HF. Frequency matching based on age and sex was used to select a comparison cohort consisting of 80,288 adults without HF. Events of incident stroke were identified from medical claims during the 2000–2013 follow-up period. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the association of stroke with HF were calculated with a multiple Cox proportional hazard model. Another nested stroke cohort study of 480,604 hospitalized stroke patients determined the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for adverse events after stroke in patients with and without HF between 2000 and 2009.

Results

Compared with the non-HF cohort, HF patients had an increased risk of stroke (HR 2.32, 95% CI 2.21–2.43), including ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. The association between HF and stroke was significant in both sexes and in patients in all age groups and with various medical conditions. Previous HF was associated with poststroke mortality (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.31–1.50), pneumonia (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.28–1.38), and septicemia (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.23–1.37).

Conclusion

HF was associated with a higher risk of stroke, and patients with HF had more complications and greater mortality after stroke.

Off-label Use for Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Valvular Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Thrombus, Superficial Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Hypertension-a Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical literature for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) therapy for non-Food and Drug Administration approved indications.

DATA SOURCES

Articles from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and OVID databases were reviewed from 1946 through September 4, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Fully published studies assessing DOACs for atrial fibrillation (AF) with valvular heart disease (VHD), heart failure (HF), left ventricular thrombus (LVT), superficial vein thrombosis (SVT), or pulmonary hypertension (PH) were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Our review showed that DOACs are safe to use in patients with AF and VHD except for mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valve. Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily should be used with caution in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction until further evaluation is performed. Four retrospective studies for DOAC use in patients with LVT showed conflicting results. One phase 3 randomized controlled trial showed noninferiority of rivaroxaban to fondaparinux for SVT treatment. The use of DOACs for pulmonary arterial hypertension was not evaluated in any clinical study, but 2 retrospective studies for the use of DOACs in patients with chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) showed similar efficacy between DOACs and warfarin.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review provides clinicians with a comprehensive literature review surrounding DOAC use in common off-label indications.

CONCLUSION

DOACs can be considered for AF complicated by VHD except for mitral stenosis or mechanical valve replacement. DOACs (especially rivaroxaban) are considered as an alternative therapy for SVT and CTEPH. Further prospective studies for DOAC uses are needed for HF or LVT.

Plasma D-dimer concentrations predicting stroke risk and rivaroxaban benefit in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm: an analysis from the COMMANDER-HF trial

AIMS

D-dimer is a marker of fibrin degradation that reflects intravascular coagulation. Therefore, plasma concentrations of D-dimer might predict thromboembolic risk and rivaroxaban treatment effect. The aims of this study were to investigate the association between D-dimer levels and the risk of stroke and other thrombotic, bleeding and fatal events, and whether D-dimer concentrations could predict rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (vs. placebo) effect in patients enrolled in the COMMANDER-HF trial who were in sinus rhythm, had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Survival models with treatment-by-plasma D-dimer interaction. Baseline measurement of D-dimer was available in 4107 (82%) of 5022 patients enrolled. Median (percentile_25-75 ) follow-up was 21 (12.9-32.8) months. The median (percentile_25-75 ) plasma concentration of D-dimer was 360 (215-665) ng/mL. The D-dimer tertiles were: (i) ≤255 ng/mL; (ii) 256-515 ng/mL; and (iii) >515 ng/mL. Patients within the tertile 3 were older, and had lower body mass index, blood pressure, haemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Higher plasma D-dimer concentrations were independently associated with higher rates of death, stroke, and venous thromboembolism. For example, the all-cause death adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95%CI) of tertile 3 vs. tertile 1 was 1.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-2.11; P < 0.001]. The effect of rivaroxaban was similar in each tertile of D-dimer for all outcomes except stroke. Patients within the tertile 3 had the greatest absolute and relative stroke reduction (tertile 1: HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.49-2.74; tertile 2: HR 1.45, 95% CI 0.77-2.73; tertile 3: HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.70; P for interaction = 0.008). The number-needed-to-treat to prevent one stroke in tertile 3 was 36.

CONCLUSIONS

In COMMANDER-HF, rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke but the benefit may be confined to patients with D-dimer concentrations above 515 ng/mL. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Meta-Analysis of Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Sinus Rhythm

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events. We compared the safety and efficacy of different antithrombotic strategies for HFrEF and sinus rhythm. PubMed and Embase were searched through January 2020 for studies comparing oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelet agents or placebo in HFrEF and sinus rhythm to include in this network meta-analysis. We identified 5 randomized controlled trials with a total of 9,390 patients randomized to low dose rivaroxaban, vitamin K antagonist (VKA), antiplatelets, or placebo. Low dose rivaroxaban and VKA did not show a significant decrease in stroke compared with placebo but were associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (risk ratio [RR] 6.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16 to 40.7; RR 8.62, 95% CI 1.52 to 48.9, respectively). When compared with antiplatelets, low dose rivaroxaban and VKA were associated with a significantly decreased risk of stroke (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.76, respectively), but with a significantly increased risk of major bleeding (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.33; RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.84, respectively). There was no significant difference in these outcomes between low dose rivaroxaban versus VKA and antiplatelets versus placebo. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or rehospitalization for heart failure among each treatment. In conclusion, in patient with HFrEF and sinus rhythm, use of oral anticoagulation with or without antiplatelet agents increases the risk of bleeding without substantial effects on the risk of ischemic stroke.

Effects of rivaroxaban on activated clotting time in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in Chinese patients

PURPOSE

It has been observed that patients on rivaroxaban require more heparin and frequent activated clotting time (ACT) monitoring throughout the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, but the strategy of heparin injection varies in different studies. We sought to examine the determinants of heparin dosage in Chinese patients on rivaroxaban.

METHODS

We reviewed consecutive patients who received rivaroxaban before atrial fibrillation ablation and compared them to patients on no anticoagulant. The dosage of heparin required to achieve ACT > 300 s was evaluated. We then tested determinants of heparin dosage prospectively.

RESULTS

There were 124 patients on rivaroxaban (R group) and 42 on no anticoagulant (NA group) in retrospective study. Heparin dosage required to achieve target ACT was 0.89 ± 0.01 mg/kg in R group and 0.60 ± 0.01 mg/kg in NA group, P < 0.05. The bolus heparin dosage required was 0.77 ± 0.01 mg/kg (96.1 ± 1.1 U/kg) when baseline ACT > 200 s. In the prospective study, 80/90(88.9%) of patients in R group and 79/90(87.8%) in NA group achieved an ACT > 300 s after initial bolus injection of heparin. The ACT 60 min after target ACT (ACT60) in R group was higher than that in NA group (287.5 ± 28.3 VS 238.9 ± 29.5, P < 0.05). Rivaroxaban was the only independent predictor of ACT60. There was no significant difference in ACT or heparin dosage in patients with different duration on or withdrawal of rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation on rivaroxaban, the effective duration of heparin is prolonged and the procedural heparin requirement is significantly greater. Heparin dosage can be predicted by baseline ACT, but not influenced by duration on or withdrawal of rivaroxaban.