Absence of the XIST gene from late-replicating isodicentric X chromosomes in leukaemia

X-chromosome inactivation in mammals

The inactive X chromosome differs from the active X in a number of ways; some of these, such as allocyclic replication and altered histone acetylation, are associated with all types of epigenetic silencing, whereas others, such as DNA methylation, are of more restricted use. These features are acquired progressively by the inactive X after onset of initiation. Initiation of X-inactivation is controlled by the X-inactivation center (Xic) and influenced by the X chromosome controlling element (Xce), which causes primary nonrandom X-inactivation. Other examples of nonrandom X-inactivation are also presented in this review. The definition of a major role for Xist, a noncoding RNA, in X-inactivation has enabled investigation of the mechanism leading to establishment of the heterochromatinized X-chromosome and also of the interactions between X-inactivation and imprinting as well as between X-inactivation and developmental processes in the early embryo.

Stabilization of Xist RNA mediates initiation of X chromosome inactivation

The onset of X inactivation is preceded by a marked increase in the level of Xist RNA. Here we demonstrate that increased stability of Xist RNA is the primary determinant of developmental up-regulation. Unstable transcript is produced by both alleles in XX ES cells and in XX embryos prior to the onset of random X inactivation. Following differentiation, transcription of unstable RNA from the active X chromosome allele continues for a period following stabilization and accumulation of transcript on the inactive X allele. We discuss the implications of these findings in terms of models for the initiation of random and imprinted X inactivation.

The (epi)genetic control of mammalian X-chromosome inactivation

In mammals, the X chromosome is uniquely capable of complete inactivation. Research in the past two years has validated the long-held hypothesis that the 'X-inactivation center' (Xic) controls events of X inactivation and that its resident gene Xist is not only required but is at least partially responsible for the cis-restriction of X inactivation. Progress has also been made in identifying genes within the Xic. Although Xist remains the only known required element, evidence now suggests that a separate element for X counting must exist and that the Xic may be entirely contained within a 450 kb sequence. This small region may be sufficient for both initiation and establishment of X inactivation.

Mosaic methylation of Xist gene before chromosome inactivation in undifferentiated female mouse embryonic stem and embryonic germ cells

Epigenetic modification is implicated in the choice of the X chromosome to be inactivated in the mouse. In order to gain more insight into the nature of such modification, we carried out a series of experiments using undifferentiated mouse cell lines as a model system. Not only the paternally derived X (XP) chromosome, but the maternally derived one (XM) was inactivated in the outer layer of the balloon-like cystic embryoid body probably corresponding to the yolk sac endoderm of the post-implantation embryo in which XP is preferentially inactivated. Hence, it is likely that the imprint responsible for the nonrandom XP inactivation in early mouse development has been erased or masked in female ES cells. CpG sites in the 5' region of the Xist gene were partially methylated in female ES and EG and parthenogenetic ES cell lines as in the female somatic cell in which the silent Xist allele on the active X is fully methylated, whereas the expressed allele on the inactive X is completely unmethylated. In the case of undifferentiated ES cells, however, methylation was not differential between two Xist alleles. This observation was supported by the demonstration that single-cell clones derived from female ES cell lines were not characterized by either allele specific Xist methylation or nonrandom X inactivation upon cell differentiation. Apparently these findings are at variance with the view that Xist expression and X inactivation are controlled by preemptive methylation in undifferentiated ES cells and probably in epiblast.

Isodicentric (X)(q13) in haematological malignancies: presentation of five new cases, application of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and review of the literature

Idic(X)(q13) represents a rare but recurrent chromosomal abnormality in haematological malignancies. We present five new cases characterized by this particular aberration and review the literature on this subject. The patients were elderly females with a diagnosis of refractory anaemia (1/5), refractory anaemia with ringed sideroblasts (2/5), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (1/5), and Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloid leukaemia (1/5). Three out of the five patients demonstrated an increased proportion of bone marrow ringed sideroblasts. After a follow-up period of 30-57 months all patients but one are alive. Idic(X)(q13) always occurred as the sole chromosomal abnormality, either in one or in two copies. We confirmed the dicentric nature of the aberration by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on metaphases as well as interphase nuclei using an X-chromosome-specific alpha-satellite probe, and performed chromosome painting to visualize possible additional chromosomal changes involving the X chromosomes. Our findings and the data of 17 previously published cases indicate that idic(X)(q13): (1) may play a significant pathogenetic role in haematological malignancies affecting exclusively females and deriving predominantly from early progenitor cells; (2) is frequently associated with a pathological iron accumulation; (3) indicates a variable prognosis.

XIST expression is repressed when X inactivation is reversed in human placental cells: a model for study of XIST regulation

Considerable evidence suggests that the X inactive transcript gene, XIST/Xist, has a role in the initial steps of X chromosome inactivation in the female mammalian embryo. It is transcribed exclusively from inactive X chromosomes, and its noncoding transcript seems to be essential for cis inactivation. Unexpected for a developmental gene, XIST continues to be expressed in adult somatic cells. To determine the effect of reversal of inactivation on the expression of XIST, we studied human X chromosomes that had been induced to reverse X inactivation by hybridization of chorionic villi cells from term placentas with mouse A9 cells. In nine hybrids with a reactivated X chromosome, XIST was either not expressed or expressed much less than the locus on the inactive X chromosome in the chorionic villi cells from which they were derived. The repressibility of XIST by reversal of inactivation in these placental cells mirrors events that occur during the ontogeny of oocytes and indicates that the locus is subject to regulation in somatic cells long after inactivation is established in the embryo. The small residual XIST activity from these active chromosomes suggests that low levels of XIST expression do not interfere with chromosome activity and raises the possibility that the induction of cis inactivation requires a certain level of XIST transcription. The chorionic villi hybrids provide an experimental system to study the developmental regulation of XIST.