Phase I clinical and pharmacology study of topotecan given daily for 5 consecutive days to patients with advanced solid tumors, with attempt at dose intensification using recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the new topoisomerase inhibitor GI147211 given as a 72-h continuous infusion

GI147211 is a novel, totally synthetic camptothecin with promising preclinical and early clinical activity. This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of Gl147211 as a 72-h infusion and to describe its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics on this schedule. In a single-arm, rising-dose study in patients with advanced cancer, eight cohorts of three or more patients received 72-h infusions of Gl147211 at doses ranging from 0.25 to 2.5 mg m(-2) day(-1). Forty-four patients received a total of 124 cycles. All patients had refractory tumours and 40 had received prior chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Whole-blood Gl147211 lactone, total blood and total concentrations were measured during and over the 12 h following the infusion. Myelosuppression was observed at all dose levels. Neutropenia was dose limiting at 2.0 mg m(-2) day(-1) in minimally pretreated patients, while both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were limiting at 1.5 mg m(-2) day(-1) in those more heavily pretreated. Phlebitis occurred with infusions through peripheral veins early in this study, necessitating the use of central venous access. Other toxicities included mild nausea and vomiting, fatigue, headache, central venous catheter infections and alopecia. Three partial and two minor responses lasting 8-34+ weeks were noted in patients with ovarian, colon and breast carcinomas and hepatoma. Mean steady-state concentrations of Gl147211 increased with dose over a range of 0.25-1.24 ng ml(-1). The mean terminal elimination half-life was 7.5 h, and the clearance averaged 1074 ml min(-1) m(-2) over the doses studied. The mean fractional excretion of unchanged drug in urine was 0.114. Gl147211 lactone exposure correlated with haematological toxicity. The recommended phase II doses for this regimen are 1.75 mg m(-2) day(-1) and 1.2 mg m(-2) day(-1) for minimally pretreated and heavily pretreated patients respectively. At these doses, steady-state Gl147211 concentrations within the range of those effective in vitro were achieved. Extensive phase II evaluation of this compound and further phase I trials evaluating more prolonged infusions are ongoing.

Clinical applications of the camptothecins

The camptothecin topoisomerase I-targeting agents are new class of antitumor drugs with demonstrated clinical activity in human malignancies, such as colorectal cancer and ovarian cancer. Currently, irinotecan and topotecan are the most widely used camptothecin analogs in clinical use and clinical trials are ongoing to better characterize their spectra of clinical activity, to determine their optimal schedules of administration and to define their use in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Newer camptothecin analogs in clinical development, such as 9-aminocamptothecin, 9-nitrocamptothecin, GI147211 and DX-8951f, are also being studied to determine if they have improved toxicity and efficacy profiles compared with existing analogs. Other potential clinical applications include the use of camptothecin derivatives as radiation sensitizers or as antiviral agents. The successful development of the camptothecins as antitumor agents highlights the importance of topoisomerase I as a target for cancer chemotherapy.

Clinical pharmacology of camptothecins

Camptothecins (CPTs) are a unique class of chemotherapeutic agent which inhibit DNA synthesis by inhibiting topoisomerase I activity. Structure-activity studies on the original CPT alkaloid led to the development of the new analogues irinotecan (CPT-11), topotecan, and 9-aminocamptothecin, which have improved water solubility and lower toxicity. CPT analogues exhibit interesting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and metabolic properties that are of major research and clinical interest. This review describes the clinical pharmacology of these 3 CPT analogues. Specific areas such as absorption after extravascular administration, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variability, metabolism, and administration in special populations are discussed.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors and drug resistance

DNA topoisomerase I is a nuclear enzyme which catalyzes the conversion of the DNA topology by introducing single-strand breaks into the DNA molecule. This enzyme represents a novel and distinct molecule target for cancer therapy by antitopoisomerase drugs belonging to the campthotecin series of antineoplastics. As many tumors can acquire resistance to drug treatment and become refractary to the chemotherapy it is very important to investigate the mechanisms involved in such a drug resistance for circumventing the phenomenon. This article describes the role of topoisomerase I in cell functions and the methods used to assess its in vitro catalytic activity. It reviews the mechanisms of cytotoxicity of the most specific antitopoisomerase I drugs by considering also the phenomenon of drug resistance. Some factors useful to drive the future perspectives in the development of new topoisomerase I inhibitors are also evidenced and discussed.

Five days of oral topotecan (Hycamtin), a phase I and pharmacological study in adult patients with solid tumours

Topotecan is a specific inhibitor to topoisomerase I. An oral formulation of topotecan is available with a bioavailability of 32-44% in humans. A phase I and pharmacological study of the oral formulation of topotecan administered daily for 5 days every 21 days was performed in adult patients with solid tumours to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Adult patients with a WHO performance status < or = 2 adequate haematological, hepatic and renal functions, with malignant solid tumours refractory to standard forms were entered into the study. Pharmacokinetics were performed on days 1 and 4 of the first course using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic assay. 29 patients entered the study, all patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. The doses studied in the 29 patients were 1.2, 1.8, 2.3, 2.7 mg/m2/day and a fixed dose of 4 mg/day without surface area adjustment. A total of 109 courses were given. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at a dose of 2.7 mg/m2/day and consisted of CTC (NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria) grade IV granulocytopenia. The regimen was well tolerated. Non-haematological toxicities were mild, including fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. A significant correlation was observed between the percentage decrease in white blood cells versus the area under the curve (AUC(t)) of topotecan lactone (R = 0.76 P < 0.01) which was modelled by a sigmoidal Emax function. The correlation coefficient between the absolute topotecan dose administered and the AUC(t) was R = 0.52 (P = 0.04). Pharmacokinetics of the fixed dose of 4 mg/day were comparable to the 2.3 mg/m2/day dose. DLT in this phase I study of five daily doses of oral topotecan every 21 days was granulocytopenia. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 2.3 mg/m2/day or alternatively, a fixed dose of 4 mg/day.

High-dose topotecan with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in fluoropyrimidine-refractory colorectal cancer: a phase II and pharmacodynamic study

PURPOSE

The premise for this study was that topotecan (TPT) resistance in preclinical studies is associated with low level expression of the p-glycoprotein (Pgp) multi-drug transporter conferred by the multi-drug resistant (MDR) phenotype, which might be overcome in clinical practice by administering moderately (2.3-fold) higher doses of TPT that have shown to be feasible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. This phase II study evaluated the anti-tumor activity of TPT administered at its highest possible solid tumor dose with G-SCF in patients with fluoropyrimidine-refractory advanced colorectal carcinoma. The study also sought to identify pharmacodynamic (PD) determinants of both activity and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for five days every three weeks at a dose of 3.5 mg/m2/day to patients with advance colorectal carcinoma who developed progressive disease either during treatment with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for advanced disease or within six months after receiving fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. This dose of TPT was previously determined to be the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) with G-CSF support in a phase I study involving solid tumor patients with similar risk factors for myelosuppression. Plasma sampling with performed during course 1 to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) and PD behavior of TPT.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients who received 89 courses of TPT and G-CSF were evaluable for toxicity; 16 patients were evaluable for anti-tumor response. Toxicity, particularly myelosuppression, was substantial. At the 3.5 mg/m2/day dose level, absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) were less than 500/microliters for longer than 5 days in 17% of courses involving seven of seventeen (41%) patients. Severe neutropenia associated with fever occurred in 12.3% of courses; and platelet counts below 25,000/microliters were noted in 26.9% of courses. These toxicities resulted in dose reductions in seven of 17 (41%) patients. Nevertheless, 90% of the planned total dose of TPT was administered. No major responses were observed, though minor activity was noted in several patients. Both the median time to progression and the median survival time were short--2.5 and 4 months respectively. Although interindividual variability in the disposition of total TPT was observed, the lack of objective responses precluded PD assessments related to disease activity. Total TPT exposure was significantly higher than drug exposure achieved in similar patients at an identical dose in a previous phase I study of TPT and G-CSF, which may explain why more severe myelosuppressive effects occurred in the present study. There were no PD relationships evident between relevant PK parameters and the percent decrements in platelets and ANC's during course 1, although patients with severe toxic effects (ANC below 500/microliters for more than five days and/or platelets < 25,000/microliters) had higher drug exposure than patients with less severe toxicity (P < 0.018 and P = 0.09, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, the true response rate of TPT at its solid tumor MTD with G-CSF support is unlikely to approach 20%. Although a response rate of less than 20% might be viewed as significant in this disease setting and might be confirmed with sufficient statistical certainty by treating additional patients, the substantial toxicity, inconvenience, and cost associated with this high dose TPT/G-CSF regimen does not warrant the acceptance of a lower level of anti-tumor activity as a criterion for further development.

A phase II study of topotecan administered five times daily in patients with advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

Topotecan (Tpt), a semisynthetic analogue of camptothecin (Cpt), has shown excellent preclinical activity in a number of solid tumors. Cpt, the parent compound, has preclinical activity against several gastrointestinal tumors, including a gastric adenocarcinoma xenograft. A phase-II clinical trial was conducted to assess the activity to Tpt in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

15 patients with advanced, incurable gastric adenocarcinomas were treated. Tpt 1.5 (mg/m2/day) was administered intravenously as a 30-min infusion daily for 5 consecutive days. Treatments were repeated on a 21-days cycle.

RESULTS

No major objective responses were observed in 13 evaluable patients (response rate = 0%; 95% confidence interval = 0-22%). The major dose-limiting toxicity in this trial was myelosuppression, which was severe in this patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Tpt at the dose and schedule studies does not possess substantial antitumor activity in patient with gastric cancer, and the toxicities were formidable. We do not advocate further development of this drug in the treatment of gastric cancer. Tpt has shown more promising activity and tolerability in other patient populations, and these areas deserve further exploration.

9-Aminocamptothecin by 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion is inactive in the treatment of patients with 5-fluorouracil-refractory colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

9-Aminocamptothecin (9AC) and its parent compound, camptothecin, have shown outstanding preclinical activity against colorectal carcinoma. Irinotecan (CPT-11), another camptothecin derivative, has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-refractory colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

The authors performed a Phase II trial of 9AC involving patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma who had progressed through only one prior regimen of 5-FU-based chemotherapy. 9AC was given initially at a dose of 59 microg/m2/hour by continuous intravenous infusion for 72 hours, with treatments repeated every 14 days. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was given on Days 5-12.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were treated on this trial. Fourteen were evaluable for response. Contrary to expectations, no major objective antitumor responses were observed. Eight patients experienced stable disease for a median of 4.1 months (range, 2.2-9.5 months). Toxicities, especially myelosuppression, were severe and necessitated a 15% reduction in the initial dose after the first 9 patients. Toxicities at this reduced dose remained unacceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

9AC did not demonstrate substantial activity against 5-FU-refractory colorectal carcinoma on the schedule studied. Toxicities at the doses and schedule studied were unacceptable in this patient population. Based on their results, the authors consider it unlikely that 9AC administered as a 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion will play a major role in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors: review and update

This review presents a summary of preclinical and clinical data on the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitors that are under clinical development. To date, all of the topo I inhibitors that have been clinically evaluated are analogues of camptothecin, an extract of the Chinese tree Camptotheca acuminata. The therapeutic development of camptothecin was initially limited by its poor solubility and unpredictable toxicity. More recently, a number of water-soluble camptothecin analogues have undergone extensive evaluation and have demonstrated significant clinical activity. These include irinotecan (CPT-II), topotecan, and 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC). Preliminary data are also reviewed on other camptothecin analogues (GG-211 and DX-8951f), on oral formulations, and on non-camptothecin topoisomerase I inhibitors. The topoisomerase I inhibitors have already demonstrated a broad spectrum of antitumour activity, most probably due to their unique mechanism of action and lack of clinical cross-resistance with existing antineoplastic compounds. The challenge for the next five years is to identify ways to integrate the topo I inhibitors into multidrug and multimodality therapies to achieve optimal antitumour effect, while keeping the side effects of these therapies manageable.

Dose intensity for bolus versus infusion chemotherapy administration: review of the literature for 27 anti-neoplastic agents

PROBLEM

The dose intensity (DI) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of anti-neoplastic agents is assumed to be a critical factor for achieving optimal therapeutic benefit. Each of these factors may be influenced by the schedule of drug administration, specifically infusional or bolus delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature for selected antineoplastic drugs to analyze the relative DI and MTD for bolus vs. infusional administration schedules.

METHODS

Clinical reports of bolus and infusional delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs in the categories of antimetabolites; alkylating agents; antibiotics; plant alkaloids and platinum analogues were collected focusing on phase I studies establishing the MTD per cycle and the DI. Infusional schedules were defined as continuous parenteral administration for more than 24 hours or, in some instances, daily bolus dosing for one hour for 3 to 5 days. Bolus schedules were defined as administration over minutes up to 24 hours and also included daily dosing in some cases.

RESULTS

For antimetabolites, the infusional schedule generally decreases the MTD and DI relative to bolus administration but for 5-FU, the MTD and DI both increase. For alkylating agents and the platinum analogues, the MTD and DI for bolus and infusional delivery are generally comparable; but infusional administration results in a slightly increased MTD for thiotepa and for ifosfamide, the MTD is increased depending upon the duration of the infusion. For the antibiotics and the plant alkaloids, the MTD and DI of infusional administration is variable related to the specific agent and the infusion duration and may be increased, decreased or comparable to the MTD of bolus schedules.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD and DI for most cytotoxic agents administered by bolus versus infusional schedules is unpredictable and variable and is influenced by the infusion duration and the interval between treatment cycles (for example three versus four week intervals). The MTD and DI increase substantially with infusional delivery for thiotepa, 5-FU and VM26 (the latter in leukemia specifically) and decrease substantially for the antimetabolites FUDR, ara-C, methotrexate and 6MP. For most other agents and in all four drug categories, the MTD and DI are relatively comparable although for ifosfamide and topotecan, the duration of infusion determines whether the MTD and DI increases, decreases or stays the same relative to bolus administration. The use of cytokines may substantially change the MTD and DI especially for bolus administration since dose limiting toxicity is hematologic for many agents.

Phase I and pharmacological study of sequential intravenous topotecan and oral etoposide

We performed a phase I and pharmacological study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of a cytotoxic regimen of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan in combination with the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide, and to investigate the clinical pharmacology of both compounds. Patients with advanced solid tumours were treated at 4-week intervals, receiving topotecan intravenously over 30 min on days 1-5 followed by etoposide given orally twice daily on days 6-12. Topotecan-etoposide dose levels were escalated from 0.5/20 to 1.0/20, 1.0/40, and 1.25/40 (mg m-2 day-1)/(mg bid). After encountering DLT, additional patients were treated at 3-week intervals with the topotecan dose decreased by one level to 1.0 mg m-2 and etoposide administration prolonged from 7 to 10 days to allow further dose intensification. Of 30 patients entered, 29 were assessable for toxicity in the first course and 24 for response. The DLT was neutropenia. At doses of topotecan-etoposide 1.25/40 (mg m-2)/(mg bid) two out of six patients developed neutropenia grade IV that lasted more than 7 days. Reduction of the treatment interval to 3 weeks and prolonging etoposide dosing to 10 days did not permit further dose intensification, as a time delay to retreatment owing to unrecovered bone marrow rapidly emerged as the DLT. Post-infusion total plasma levels of topotecan declined in a biphasic manner with a terminal half-life of 2.1 +/- 0.3 h. Total body clearance was 13.8 +/- 2.7 l h-1 m-2 with a steady-state volume of distribution of 36.7 +/- 6.2 l m-2. N-desmethyltopotecan, a metabolite of topotecan, was detectable in plasma and urine. Mean maximal concentrations ranged from 0.23 to 0.53 nmol l-1, and were reached at 3.4 +/- 1.0 h after infusion. Maximal etoposide plasma concentrations of 0.75 +/- 0.54 and 1.23 +/- 0.57 micromol l-1 were reached at 2.4 +/- 1.2 and 2.3 +/- 1.0 h after ingestion of 20 and 40 mg respectively. The topotecan area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) correlated with the percentage decrease in white blood cells (WBC) (r2 = 0.70) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (r2 = 0.65). A partial response was observed in a patient with metastatic ovarian carcinoma. A total of 64% of the patients had stable disease for at least 4 months. The recommended dose for use in phase II clinical trials is topotecan 1.0 mg m-2 on days 1-5 and etoposide 40 mg bid on days 6-12 every 4 weeks.

Continuous infusional topotecan in advanced breast and non-small-cell lung cancer: no evidence of increased efficacy

Two open, phase II studies were performed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of infusional topotecan in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and advanced breast cancer who had not received previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Twenty-five patients with an ECOG performance score < 2 were treated with infusional topotecan administered as a daily, continuous intravenous infusion starting at 0.6 mg m(-2) day(-1) (NSCLC) and 0.5 mg m(-2) day(-1) (breast cancer) for 21 days every 4 weeks. Three patients achieved a partial response as defined by WHO criteria: one with NSCLC (8%; 95% CI 0-39%) and two with advanced breast cancer (15%; 95% CI 2-45%). The major toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with one episode of neutropenic sepsis. These data suggest that topotecan delivered as a continuous intravenous infusion over 21 days as single-agent therapy does not appear to offer a clinical advantage over conventional 5-day schedules against advanced NSCLC and advanced breast cancer.

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) study of topotecan using a five-day course in children with refractory solid tumors: a pediatric oncology group study

PURPOSE

A phase I trial was conducted in children with refractory solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics for topotecan administered by a 30-min infusion for 5 consecutive days.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty children with a variety of recurrent solid tumors, including nine patients with neuroblastoma and 10 with brain tumors, were given topotecan as a 30-min infusion for 5 consecutive days, beginning with a dose of 1.4 mg/m2/day. The dose was escalated in 20% increments after establishing that DLT was not present at the prior dose. Drug toxicity was graded using standard criteria. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 3 or 4 nonhematopoietic toxicity or grade 4 hematopoietic toxicity lasting > 7 days. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during the first infusion course.

RESULTS

The DLT was hematopoietic and involved both platelets and neutrophils. Grade 4 hematopoietic toxicity of brief duration was seen at all dose levels. Over half of the patients received red blood cell transfusion support, and 19/40 received platelet transfusions. Hospital admissions for fever and neutropenia or for documented infections occurred in 32 of 169 courses of therapy. Gastrointestinal symptoms with nausea and vomiting or diarrhea were mild to moderate in 12 of the 40 patients. Antitumor responses were seen in three patients with neuroblastoma. An additional four patients (one with neuroblastoma, two with anaplastic astrocytomas, one with Ewing) had stable disease with continued therapy for > 6 months. Using a limited sampling model, pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 36 of the 40 patients. Topotecan lactone and total clearance were similar to those reported in other pediatric populations receiving topotecan by continuous infusion. A pharmacodynamic relation between systemic exposure to topotecan lactone and myclosuppression was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In heavily pretreated children, the MTD for topotecan given by intermittent 30-min infusion for 5 days is 1.4 mg/m2 without GCSF and 2.0 mg/m2/day with GCSF. The dose-limiting toxicity is hematopoietic. Data from this study provide the basis for further studies of topotecan in children with cancer.

Phase II evaluation of topotecan for pediatric central nervous system tumors

BACKGROUND

Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has good penetration across the blood-brain barrier and significant antitumor activity against human brain tumor xenografts. In a Phase I trial in children with refractory cancer, topotecan was well tolerated when administered as a 24-hour infusion. The maximum tolerated dose was 5.5 mg/m2 and the dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. This Phase II study of topotecan was performed to assess the activity of topotecan against childhood brain tumors.

METHODS

Forty-five children with either a previously treated primary brain tumor that was refractory to standard therapy, or an untreated brain stem glioma or glioblastoma multiforme, received topotecan administered as a 24-hour intravenous infusion every 21 days. The initial dose was 5.5 mg/m2 with escalation to 7.5 mg/m2 on the second and subsequent doses in patients who did not experience dose-limiting toxicity.

RESULTS

There were no complete or partial responses in the patients with high grade glioma (n=9), medulloblastoma (n=9), or brain stem glioma (n=14). One of 2 patients with a low grade glioma had a partial response lasting more than 17 months; 3 patients with a brain stem glioma had stable disease for 12 to 28 weeks; and 1 patient with a malignant neuroepithelial tumor and 1 patient with an optic glioma had stable disease for 41 weeks and 22 weeks, respectively. Dose escalation from 5.5 mg/m2 to 7.5 mg/m2 was well tolerated in the first 11 patients enrolled on this study who had not received prior craniospinal radiation therapy. The starting dose was subsequently increased to 7.5 mg/m2 for patients without prior craniospinal radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Topotecan administered as a 24-hour infusion every 21 days is inactive in high grade gliomas, medulloblastomas, and brain stem tumors.

Pediatric phase I drug tolerance: a review and comparison of recent adult and pediatric phase I trials

PURPOSE

We evaluated the ratio of pediatric to adult maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) from 70 Phase I studies conducted between 1975 and 1995. The aim of this study was to determine whether previously observed differences in drug tolerance between adult and pediatric Phase I patients have persisted over the 20-year period of this analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Phase I trials of pediatric and adult patients with solid tumors as the predominant diagnosis and sharing similar dosing regimens were evaluated. For consistent comparison between Phase I studies, the MTD was defined as the drug dose one level below that yielding dose-limiting toxicity in >30% of patients. The ratio of pediatric to adult MTDs was calculated and plotted chronologically by year of pediatric study closure. Statistical evaluation of MTD ratios included regression and correlation analysis. The extent of therapy before Phase I study entry was also examined.

RESULTS

Ninety-three Phase I studies were reviewed. Twenty-one drugs (70 studies) met our criteria for paired review of MTDs and analysis of the variation of ratio with time. The pediatric to adult MTD ratios ranged from 0.4 to 2.8, with a median of 1.2. Regression analysis of the ratio of MTD versus date of pediatric study closure supports a linear relationship of decreasing ratio with time (p<0.01). Analysis of the regression line predicts MTD ratios of 2.02 and 0.76 for 1974 and 1995, respectively. Of patients included in this analysis, 37.1% and 68.6% of adult and pediatric patients, respectively, were considered to have been heavily pretreated before study entry. A significant (p<0.001) downward trend with time was observed in the proportion of adult patients entering Phase I studies who had received both radiation and chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review continue to show an equal or greater drug tolerance in the pediatric population when compared with adult patients for most drugs studied during Phase I trials. However, there appears to be significant trend of decreasing differences in drug tolerance between pediatric and adult Phase I patients with time, as defined by the descent of the MTD ratio toward values <1.0. Mechanisms to explain greater drug tolerance in children and the observation of decreasing maximum tolerated dose ratios with time are discussed. Limited data suggest that changes in degree of therapy before Phase I study entry may be influencing the MTD ratio.

Current perspectives on camptothecins in cancer treatment

The camptothecins are a new class of chemotherapeutic agents which have a novel mechanism of action targeting the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. Knowledge of the structure-activity relationships of the parent compound camptothecin has led to the development of effective soluble analogues with manageable toxicities. Broad anti-tumour activity shown in preclinical studies has been confirmed in phase I/II studies for irinotecan and topotecan. Two other derivatives, 9-aminocamptothecin and GI 147211C, are undergoing phase I and early phase II evaluation. Although camptothecin is a plant extract, it and most of its derivatives are not affected by the classic P-gpMDR1 mechanism of resistance which may allow the development of novel combination chemotherapeutic regimens. Important areas of future endeavour will include the development of rational combination regimens and the pursuit of randomised trials. Based on single agent data, colorectal cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer should be the focus for future irinotecan studies. Small-cell lung cancer and ovarian carcinoma are logical tumour types to pursue with topotecan. Both 9-aminocamptothecin and GI 147211C are too early in their clinical evaluation to make recommendations about their future roles. Finally, the unfolding story of camptothecin analogue development will give important insights into the predictive value of preclinical observations on relative efficacy, schedule dependency, combination strategies and resistance mechanisms which have helped determine the strategies for clinical evaluation of these agents.

Phase I trial design: are new methodologies being put into practice?

BACKGROUND

The primary goal of phase I studies is to efficiently and accurately determine the recommended dose of a new agent for further investigation. Issues of concern ranging from the ethics of these trials to selection of starting dose and rapidity of dose escalation, have led to suggested modifications of the traditional phase I design. We wanted to assess the frequency with which these new approaches are being applied to recent phase I trials and, if possible, their impact.

METHODS

Reports of phase I trials of single agent cytotoxics published between 1993 and 1995 were identified by computer search and review of cancer journals. Data on starting dose, toxicology, dose escalation method, definition of dose limiting toxicity (DLT), actual maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose were abstracted.

RESULTS

Reports of 46 phase I trials were identified: 27 were the first clinical studies of 17 new cytotoxic agents (group A) and 19 were repeat studies of 14 agents (group B). Starting doses in group A were based on preclinical animal toxicology (usually mouse or dog) and for group B on previous clinical experience. Dog toxicology appropriately influenced starting dose in 3 of 6 trials. The majority of group A (19/27) studies employed modified Fibonacci dose escalation; group B studies commonly escalated doses by fixed increments. The definition of DLT was highly variable across studies. MTD was usually defined as the dose level at which > 2/6 patients experienced DLT but several studies required 3-4/6 patients. In 30 trials, the recommended phase II dose was one dose level below the MTD; but in 10 trials the terms MTD and recommended phase II dose were considered synonymous.

CONCLUSION

Despite proposed new methodologies (particularly dose escalation) for phase I trials, very few are being employed in practice. A concerted effort should be made to prospectively evaluate these to determine which provides the best combination of safety and efficacy. In addition, the lack of standardization in the definition of limiting toxicity is surprising. Those involved in drug development should strive for agreement on the acceptable degree of toxicity for phase II dose selection.

Promising new agents in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

A number of new drugs and drug classes have recently become available for clinical testing which demonstrate significant antitumor activity in non-small cell lung cancer. The preclinical rationale, mechanism of action, toxicity profile and results of early trials of paclitaxel, docetaxel, edatrexate, CPT-11, topotecan, vinorelbine and gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer are reviewed.

New chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an update including data from the Seventh World Conference on Lung Cancer

Over the past two decades, modest gains have been made in chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with the addition of cisplatin-based regimens to the therapeutic armamentarium. Over the last decade, several new agents with significant activity have reached the level of Phase II and III testing. This list of new drugs includes: navelbine, the taxanes--taxol and taxotere, gemcitabine, edatrexate and the camptothecins--irinotecan and topotecan. During this period, oral etoposide and epirubicin were re-investigated and biological agents such as the retinoids, interferons and interleukins were also explored as alternatives to traditional chemotherapy. As these new drug investigations proceeded, basic scientists made important discoveries which are now beginning to be applied to therapy. The future promises to combine these active new drugs with therapies directed against targets unique to non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks

Topotecan is a novel semisynthetic derivative of the anticancer agent camptothecin and inhibits the intranuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. The lactone structure of topotecan, which is in equilibrium with the inactive ring-opened hydroxy acid, is essential for this activity. The open form predominates at physiological pH. We performed a pharmacokinetic study as part of a phase I study in patients with various types of solid tumors, where topotecan was administered in a 30-min infusion daily on 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. The plasma kinetics of topotecan could be described best using an open two-compartment model with t1/2(alpha) and t1/2(beta) of 8.1 (range 0.3 to 40.7) min and 132 (range 49 to 286) min, respectively. The plasma concentration-time profiles of the metabolite, however, could be described using a one-compartment model with t1/2(formation) of 29.0 (range 5.6-99.5) min and t1/2 (elimination of 123.2 (range 32-265) min, respectively. The lactone was the predominate form during the first hour from the start of infusion, but was rapidly converted into its ring-opened structure. The elimination rate of topotecan was independent of the dose. There were linear relationships between the dose (mg m-2 day-1), the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of topotecan and its metabolite, the total AUC, peak plasma lactone concentrations, and the time period that the topotecan concentrations remained above 10 nM. Different models were used to correlate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. The percentage decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was related to these parameters and plots were well fitted by linear and sigmoidal Emax models.

Phase II trial of topotecan in advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

PURPOSE

A phase II trial of topotecan, an inhibitor of topoisomerase I, was conducted in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas to determine the activity and toxicity of topotecan.

PATIENTS AND MATERIALS

35 patients, previously untreated with chemotherapy, received topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d for five days intravenously and repeated every 21 days. Patients were assessed for response after 3 cycles. Those with either clinical response or stable disease received additional cycles of the drug until toxicity developed or disease progression occurred.

RESULTS

Among 30 patients evaluable for response there were no complete responses and 3 partial responses (10%) for a total response rate of 10% (95% confidence interval = 0-20.6%). Stable disease for at least eight weeks was seen in 11 patients (36%). Median survival was 19 weeks (95% confidence interval 11 to 26 weeks). Therapy was generally well tolerated, with reversible granulocytopenia being the most common toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Topotecan given on a 5 day, short infusion schedule, demonstrated limited activity in pancreatic carcinoma with minimal toxicity. Further exploration of topotecan in pancreatic carcinoma using different dosing schedules is warranted.

Phase II study of topotecan in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Systemic chemotherapy with currently available agents has not improved survival for patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), consequently, the evaluation of new agents is warranted. Topotecan is a specific inhibitor of topoisomerase I with broad antitumor activity in preclinical studies. The purpose of this phase II trial was to determine the objective response rate of topotecan administered as a 30 minute infusion for five consecutive days in men with metastatic HRPC. Thirty-four evaluable patients were treated with topotecan 1.1-1.5 mg/m2 as a 30 minute infusion daily for five days, repeated every three weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed with a combination of standard solid tumor response criteria and the serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) for patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, and by serial measurements of the PSA in patients with bone only (evaluable) disease. One of 13 patients (7.6%) with measurable soft tissue disease had a PR in nodal sites. Of 21 patients with only osseous metastases, 1 (4.7%) had improvement in bone scan. Six of the 34 evaluable patients (17.6%) had the serum PSA decrease by > or = 50% and 2 (5.8%) had PSA decreases of > or = 75%. Toxicity was chiefly hematologic with 66% of patients experiencing Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia. Thirty-nine percent of cycles required a delay to allow for hematologic recovery and ten patients required red cell transfusions. Non-hematologic toxicity, mainly nausea and alopecia, was mild. Topotecan administered at this dose and schedule has limited activity in patients with HRPC. Further trials of topo I inhibition in HRPC should utilize alternative schedules of topotecan (e.g., prolonged infusion) or other camptothecin analogs with more potent topo I inhibitory activity.

Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics and penetration of continuous infusion topotecan in children with central nervous system tumors

The purpose of this study was to describe the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration of topotecan in humans, to generate a pharmacokinetic model to simultaneously describe topotecan lactone and total concentrations in the plasma and CSF, and to characterize the CSF and plasma pharmacokinetics of topotecan administered as a continuous infusion (CI). Plasma and CSF samples were collected from 17 patients receiving 5.5 or 7.5 mg/m2 per day as a 24-h CI (5 patients, 7 courses), or 0.5 to 1.25 mg/m2 per day as a 72-h CI (12 patients, 12 courses). CSF samples were obtained from either a ventricular reservoir (VR) or a lumbar puncture (LP). Topotecan lactone and total (lactone plus hydroxy acid) concentrations were determined by HPLC and fluorescence detection. Using MAP-Bayesian modelling, a three-compartment model was fitted simultaneously to topotecan lactone and total concentrations in the plasma and CSF. The penetration of topotecan into the CSF was determined from the ratio of the CSF to the plasma area under the concentration-time curve. The median CSF ventricular lactone concentrations, obtained prior to the end of infusion (EOI), were 0.86, 1.4, 0.73, 5.3, and 4.6 ng/ml for patients receiving 0.5, 1.0, 1.25, 5.5, and 7.5 mg/m2 per day, respectively. EOI CSF lumbar lactone concentrations measured in three patients were 0.44, 1.1, and 1.7 ng/ml for topotecan doses of 1.0, 5.5, and 7.5 mg/m2 per day, respectively. In two patients receiving 1.25 mg/m2 per day, EOI CSF concentrations were obtained simultaneously from a VR and LP; the lumbar lactone concentrations were 30% and 49% lower than the ventricular concentrations. During a 24-h and a 72-h CI, the median CSF penetration of topotecan lactone was 0.29 (range 0.10 to 0.59) and 0.42 (range 0.11 to 0.86), respectively. A three-compartment model adequately described topotecan lactone and total concentrations in the plasma and CSF. Topotecan was therefore found to significantly penetrate into the CSF in humans. The pharmacokinetic model presented may be useful in the design of clinical studies of topotecan to treat CNS tumors.

Phase II trial of topotecan in patients with cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors

Fifteen patients with advanced, cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors (GCT) were treated on a phase II trial with topotecan. None of the 14 evaluable patients achieved a complete or partial response. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity. The median nadir leukocyte count was 1.75 cells/mm3, neutrophil count was 1.55 cells/mm3, hemoglobin was 8.75 gm/dl, and platelet count was 20,500 cells/mm3. Topotecan is not efficacious in the treatment of cisplatin-refractory GCT.

Camptothecin analogues: studies from the Johns Hopkins Oncology Center

The camptothecin analogues topotecan and irinotecan (CPT-11) are active anticancer drugs. This article reviews the accumulated results of clinical and laboratory studies performed with these agents at The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center. In a phase I clinical and pharmacology trial of topotecan given as a 30-min infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks, profound neutropenia precluded dose escalation above 1.5-2.0 mg/m2 per day, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The daily x5 schedule has been developed further with dose escalation using granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor support in patients who have kidney or liver dysfunction and given in combination with cisplatin. In addition, a phase I trial of topotecan given as a 5-day continuous intravenous infusion to patients with refractory leukemia has had promising antileukemic responses. A separate series of in vitro studies indicates that a modest degree of resistance to the cytotoxicity of topotecan can be mediated by P-glycoprotein. A phase I and pharmacology study of irinotecan given as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks has defined an MTD of 240 mg/m2, with dose escalation being limited by several toxicities. These included an acute treatment-related syndrome of flushing, warmth, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea; a subacute combination of nausea, diarrhea, anorexia, and weight loss; and/or neutropenia. Antitumor activity has been observed with topotecan and irinotecan in patients with a variety of solid tumors and refractory leukemia in our studies, which supports the widespread enthusiasm for this group of compounds.