The amino-terminal tails of the core histones and the translational position of the TATA box determine TBP/TFIIA association with nucleosomal DNA

SWI/SNF complexes and facilitation of TATA binding protein:nucleosome interactions

It has become increasingly apparent that eukaryotic cells possess machinery that modifies chromatin structure and that this machinery contributes to the regulation of gene expression. Identification of factors that alter chromatin structure has made possible biochemical analyses that have begun to define what structural changes each factor can cause as well as what consequences these changes have on transcription factor function. Here, a protocol that has facilitated study of energy-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes containing SWI/SNF proteins is described. Rotationally phased mononucleosome particles were assembled in vitro and used to demonstrate that human SWI/SNF complexes and the yeast RNA polymerase II holoenzyme, which contains yeast SWI/SNF proteins, can directly alter nucleosome structure in an ATP-dependent manner. A functional consequence of this nucleosome disruption is that the pol II general transcription factor, TATA binding protein (TBP), which cannot bind to unaltered nucleosomal DNA, can bind to its site on the altered nucleosome. This experimental system has been invaluable for characterization of both nucleosome alteration and facilitated transcription factor binding mediated by SWI/SNF complexes. These procedures should also be useful to examine other factors that interact with or structurally affect nucleosome particles.

Roles of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases in gene regulation

Acetylation of internal lysine residues of core histone N-terminal domains has been found correlatively associated with transcriptional activation in eukaryotes for more than three decades. Recent discoveries showing that several transcriptional regulators possess intrinsic histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and deacetylase (HDAC) activities strongly suggest that histone acetylation and deacetylation each plays a causative role in regulating transcription. Intriguingly, several HATs have been shown an ability to acetylate nonhistone protein substrates (e.g., transcription factors) in vitro as well, suggesting the possibility that internal lysine acetylation of multiple proteins exists as a rapid and reversible regulatory mechanism much like protein phosphorylation. This article reviews recent developments in histone acetylation and transcriptional regulation. We also discuss several important, yet unanswered, questions.

Binding of retinoic acid receptor heterodimers to DNA. A role for histones NH2 termini

The retinoic acid signaling pathway is controlled essentially through two types of nuclear receptors, RARs and RXRs. Ligand dependent activation or repression of retinoid-regulated genes is dependent on the binding of retinoic acid receptor (RAR)/9-cis-retinoic acid receptor (RXR) heterodimers to retinoic acid response element (RARE). Although unliganded RXR/RAR heterodimers bind constitutively to DNA in vitro, a clear in vivo ligand-dependent occupancy of the RARE present in the RARbeta2 gene promoter has been reported (Dey, A., Minucci, S., and Ozato, K. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 8191-8201). Nucleosomes are viewed as general repressors of the transcriptional machinery, in part by preventing the access of transcription factors to DNA. The ability of hRXRalpha/hRARalpha heterodimers to bind to a nucleosomal template in vitro has therefore been examined. The assembly of a fragment from the RARbeta2 gene promoter, which contains a canonical DR5 RARE, into a nucleosome core prevented hRXRalpha/hRARalpha binding to this DNA, in conditions where a strong interaction is observed with a linear DNA template. However, histone tails removal by limited proteolysis and histone hyperacetylation yielded nucleosomal RAREs able to bind to hRXRalpha/hRARalpha heterodimers. These data establish therefore the role of histones NH2 termini as a major impediment to retinoid receptors access to DNA, and identify histone hyperacetylation as a potential physiological regulator of retinoid-induced transcription.

Architectural specificity in chromatin structure at the TATA box in vivo: nucleosome displacement upon beta-phaseolin gene activation

Extensive studies of the beta-phaseolin (phas) gene in transgenic tobacco have shown that it is highly active during seed embryogenesis but is completely silent in leaf and other vegetative tissues. In vivo footprinting revealed that the lack of even basal transcriptional activity in vegetative tissues is associated with the presence of a nucleosome that is rotationally positioned with base pair precision over three phased TATA boxes present in the phas promoter. Positioning is sequence-dependent because an identical rotational setting is obtained upon nucleosome reconstitution in vitro. A comparison of DNase I and dimethyl sulfate footprints in vivo and in vitro strongly suggests that this repressive chromatin architecture is remodeled concomitant with gene activation in the developing seed. This leads to the disruption of histone-mediated DNA wrapping and the assembly of the TATA boxes into a transcriptionally competent nucleoprotein complex.

The histone tails of the nucleosome

Reversible acetylation of core histone tails plays an important role in the regulation of eukaryotic transcription, in the formation of repressive chromatin complexes, and in the inactivation of whole chromosomes. The high-resolution X-ray structure of the nucleosome core particle, as well as earlier evidence, suggests that the histone tails are largely responsible for the assembly of nucleosomes into chromatin fibers and implies that the physiological effects of histone acetylation may be achieved by modulation of a dynamic inter-conversion between the fiber and a less condensed nucleofilament structure. In addition, the tails and adjacent regions serve as recognition sites for chromatin assembly and transcription remodeling machinery and the interactions that occur may also be responsive to histone acetylation.

SWI-SNF complex participation in transcriptional activation at a step subsequent to activator binding

The SWI-SNF complex in yeast and related complexes in higher eukaryotes have been implicated in assisting gene activation by overcoming the repressive effects of chromatin. We show that the ability of the transcriptional activator GAL4 to bind to a site in a positioned nucleosome is not appreciably impaired in swi mutant yeast cells. However, chromatin remodeling that depends on a transcriptional activation domain shows a considerable, although not complete, SWI-SNF dependence, suggesting that the SWI-SNF complex exerts its major effect at a step subsequent to activator binding. We tested this idea further by comparing the SWI-SNF dependence of a reporter gene based on the GAL10 promoter, which has an accessible upstream activating sequence and a nucleosomal TATA element, with that of a CYC1-lacZ reporter, which has a relatively accessible TATA element. We found that the GAL10-based reporter gene showed a much stronger SWI-SNF dependence than did the CYC1-lacZ reporter with several different activators. Remarkably, transcription of the GAL10-based reporter by a GAL4-GAL11 fusion protein showed a nearly complete requirement for the SWI-SNF complex, strongly suggesting that SWI-SNF is needed to allow access of TFIID or the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Taken together, our results demonstrate that chromatin remodeling in vivo can occur by both SWI-SNF-dependent and -independent avenues and suggest that the SWI-SNF complex exerts its major effect in transcriptional activation at a step subsequent to transcriptional activator-promoter recognition.

Nucleosome positioning and transcription-associated chromatin alterations on the human estrogen-responsive pS2 promoter

The positioning of nucleosomes on a promoter is a significant determinant in its responsiveness to inducing signals. We have mapped the chromatin structure of the human, estrogen-responsive pS2 promoter at nucleotide level resolution within the context of its normal genomic location in human mammary epithelial cells. In vivo digestion by nucleases followed by ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed two rotationally phased and translationally positioned nucleosomes within the promoter between nucleotide positions -450 and +7. The estrogen response elements at -400 and TATAA box at -35 are each located at the edge of a nucleosome. The two precisely positioned nucleosomes exist in both transformed and nontransformed human mammary epithelial cells, regardless of estrogen receptor status or transcriptional activity of the gene. However, two structural alterations correlate with the transcriptional potential of the promoter. In MCF-7 cells, in which the pS2 promoter is inducible, the chromatin exhibits an increased sensitivity to DNase I in a region of DNA adjacent to the TATAA box and an additional micrococcal nuclease-hypersensitive site in the linker DNA between the two positioned nucleosomes. We were also able to demonstrate that nucleotides -1100 to +10 of the pS2 promoter are sufficient to determine the positioning of these two nucleosomes. Our results establish the structural features of the chromatin covering the pS2 promoter as well as transcriptionally associated alterations, suggesting how the nucleosomal template influences transcriptional regulation by estrogen receptor.

Sin mutations of histone H3: influence on nucleosome core structure and function

Sin mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae alleviate transcriptional defects that result from the inactivation of the yeast SWVI/SNF complex. We have investigated the structural and functional consequences for the nucleosome of Sin mutations in histone H3. We directly test the hypothesis that mutations in histone H3 leading to a SWI/SNF-independent (Sin) phenotype in yeast lead to nucleosomal destabilization. In certain instances this is shown to be true; however, nucleosomal destabilization does not always occur. Topoisomerase I-mediated relaxation of minichromosomes assembled with either mutant histone H3 or wild-type H3 together with histones H2A, H2B, and H4 indicates that DNA is constrained into nucleosomal structures containing either mutant or wild-type proteins. However, nucleosomes containing particular mutant H3 molecules (R116-H and T118-I) are more accessible to digestion by micrococcal nuclease and do not constrain DNA in a precise rotational position, as revealed by digestion with DNase I. This result establishes that Sin mutations in histone H3 located close to the dyad axis can destabilize histone-DNA contacts at the periphery of the nucleosome core. Other nucleosomes containing a distinct mutant H3 molecule (E105-K) associated with a Sin phenotype show very little change in nucleosome structure and stability compared to wild-type nucleosomes. Both mutant and wild-type nucleosomes continue to restrict the binding of either TATA-binding protein/transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) or the RNA polymerase III transcription machinery. Thus, different Sin mutations in histone H3 alter the stability of histone-DNA interactions to various extents in the nucleosome while maintaining the fundamental architecture of the nucleosome and contributing to a common Sin phenotype.

Structural and functional features of a specific nucleosome containing a recognition element for the thyroid hormone receptor

The Xenopus thyroid hormone receptor betaA (TRbetaA) gene contains an important thyroid hormone response element (TRE) that is assembled into a positioned nucleosome. We determine the translational position of the nucleosome containing the TRE and the rotational positioning of the double helix with respect to the histone surface. Histone H1 is incorporated into the nucleosome leading to an asymmetric protection to micrococcal nuclease cleavage of linker DNA relative to the nucleosome core. Histone H1 association is without significant consequence for the binding of the heterodimer of thyroid hormone receptor and 9-cis retinoic acid receptor (TR/RXR) to nucleosomal DNA in vitro, or for the regulation of TRbetaA gene transcription following microinjection into the oocyte nucleus. Small alterations of 3 and 6 bp in the translational positioning of the TRE in chromatin are also without effect on the transcriptional activity of the TRbetaA gene, whereas a small change in the rotational position of the TRE (3 bp) relative to the histone surface significantly reduces the binding of TR/RXR to the nucleosome and decreases transcriptional activation directed by TR/RXR. Our results indicate that the specific architecture of the nucleosome containing the TRE may have regulatory significance for expression of the TRbetaA gene.

One allele of the major histone gene cluster is enough for cell proliferation of the DT40 chicken B cell line

Thirty-nine of the 44 chicken histone genes are located in a major histone gene cluster of 110 kb, the others residing in four separate regions. We generated a heterozygous chicken DT40 mutant, 1/2 delta110 kb, devoid of one allele of the cluster, using gene targeting techniques. Analyses of the mutant revealed that the growth rate of DT40 cells was unchanged even in the absence of one allele of the cluster. Moreover, analyses involving a RNase protection assay, SDS-PAGE or Triton-acid-urea-PAGE revealed not only that in the 1/2 delta110 kb mutant the steady-state levels of total mRNAs of gene families H1, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 remained constant, but also that the amounts of histones H1, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 were not changed. A comparison by 2D-PAGE revealed no changes in total cellular protein patterns of the mutant. These observations demonstrate that all the histone gene families have the inherent ability to compensate for the disruption of one allele of the gene cluster, with no influence on cell functions.

Transcription factor access to chromatin

The question of how sequence-specific transcription factors access their cognate sites in nucleosomally organized DNA is discussed on the basis of genomic footprinting data and chromatin reconstitution experiments. A classification of factors into two categories is proposed: (i) initiator factors which are able to bind their target sequences within regular nucleosomes and initiate events leading to chromatin remodelling and transactivation; (ii) effector factors which are unable to bind regular nucleosomes and depend on initiator factors or on a pre-set nucleosomal structure for accessing their target sequences in chromatin. Studies with the MMTV promoter suggest that the extent and number of protein-DNA contacts determine whether a factor belongs to one or the other category. Initiator factors have only a few DNA contacts clustered on one side of the double helix, whereas effector factors have extensive contacts distributed throughout the whole circumference of the DNA helix. Thus, the nature of DNA recognition confers to sequence-specific factors their specific place in the sequential hierarchy of gene regulatory events.

Assays for transcription factors access to nucleosomal DNA

Several promoters have been shown to have sequence specifically positioned nucleosomes that determine the architecture of the promoter. DNA binding proteins that regulate gene expression are in many cases known to bind to their cognate DNA segments organized within such positioned nucleosomes. It has become increasingly evident that the cooperation of chromatin and transcription factors results in an efficient and fine-tuned regulation of transcription. The first step in a gene induction event must be the access of transcription factors for the regulatory promoter/enhancer target sites. In this perspective it becomes interesting to evaluate the affinity of DNA binding proteins for their cognate binding site in a nucleosome context. Here we describe the preparation of nucleosome probe, a method for in vitro nucleosome reconstitution by salt dilution, purification of the reconstituted mononucleosomes, and characterization of the translational and rotational positions of the nucleosomal DNA. In addition, methods for affinity determination and characterization of protein-nucleosomal DNA interaction, such as methylation protection and methylation interference by dimethyl sulfate, quantitative DNase I footprinting, and electrophoretic mobility shift assay, are described.

The role of chromatin in transcriptional regulation

Transcriptional activation is mediated by the facilitated binding of the basal transcription complex to the transcription start site of a promoter. The activation procedure involves protein-protein interactions between specific transcription factors and members of the basal transcription complex. However, since eukaryotic DNA is packaged with histones into nucleosomes the accessibility of the transcription factors is limited. In order to activate transcription, some of the specific transcription factors must have the capacity to bind to their binding sites when organized into nucleosomes. As a next step, the chromatin structure of the promoter needs to be decondensed in order to facilitate the binding of the basal transcription machinery. Recent data have addressed these issues and both binding of transcription factors to their chromatin binding site as well as transcription factor-induced chromatin remodelling have been demonstrated. In addition, factors that are candidates to mediate the chromatin remodelling have recently been identified and characterized. The ability of a transcription factor to recognize its cognate element in a nucleosome is an inheret property that differs among different transcription factors. The implications of the rotational and translational positioning of the DNA within a nucleosome on the accessibility of a transcription factor is described in this review. In addition, nucleosome rearrangement and juxtaposing in the context of transcriptional activation is also discussed.

Nucleoprotein gel electrophoresis for the analysis of nucleosomes and their positioning and mobility on DNA

Nucleoprotein gel electrophoresis, as well as its use in chromatin research, is reviewed from its early application in the characterization of native nucleosome composition to current uses in analyzing transcription factor-nucleosome complexes and in visualizing multiple nucleosome positioning. Despite our incomplete understanding of the principles behind the separation of particles in native polyacrylamide, gels, powerful new applications of the method have emerged in recent years. This offers the potential for novel experimental strategies, such as those that have led to the discovery of nucleosome mobility.

Histone acetylation: influence on transcription, nucleosome mobility and positioning, and linker histone-dependent transcriptional repression

We demonstrate using a dinucleosome template that acetylation of the core histones enhances transcription by RNA polymerase III. This effect is not dependent on an increased mobility of the core histone octamer with respect to DNA sequence. When linker histone is subsequently bound, we find both a reduction in nucleosome mobility and a repression of transcription. These effects of linker histone binding are independent of core histone acetylation, indicating that core histone acetylation does not prevent linker histone binding and the concomitant transcriptional repression. These studies are complemented by the use of a Xenopus egg extract competent both for chromatin assembly on replicating DNA and for RNA polymerase III transcription. Incorporation of acetylated histones and lack of linker histones together facilitate transcription by >10-fold in this system; however, they have little independent effect on transcription. Thus core histone acetylation significantly facilitates transcription, but this effect is inhibited by the assembly of linker histones into chromatin.

Glucocorticoid receptor-glucocorticoid response element binding stimulates nucleosome disruption by the SWI/SNF complex

The organization of DNA in chromatin is involved in repressing basal transcription of a number of inducible genes. Biochemically defined multiprotein complexes such as SWI/SNF (J. Côté, J. Quinn, J. L. Workman, and C. L. Peterson, Science 265:53-60, 1994) and nucleosome remodeling factor (T. Tsukiyama and C. Wu, Cell 83:1011-1020, 1995) disrupt nucleosomes in vitro and are thus candidates for complexes which cause chromatin decondensation during gene induction. In this study we show that the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), a hormone-inducible transcription factor, stimulates the nucleosome-disrupting activity of the SWI/SNF complex partially purified either from HeLa cells or from rat liver tissue. This GR-mediated stimulation of SWI/SNF nucleosome disruption depended on the presence of a glucocorticoid response element. The in vitro-reconstituted nucleosome probes used in these experiments harbored 95 bp of synthetic DNA-bending sequence in order to rotationally position the DNA. The GR-dependent stimulation of SWI/SNF-mediated nucleosome disruption, as evaluated by DNase I footprinting, was 2.7- to 3.8-fold for the human SWI/SNF complex and 2.5- to 3.2-fold for the rat SWI/SNF complex. When nuclear factor 1 (NF1) was used instead of GR, there was no stimulation of SWI/SNF activity in the presence of a mononucleosome containing an NF1 binding site. On the other hand, the SWI/SNF nucleosome disruption activity increased the access of NF1 for its nucleosomal binding site. No such effect was seen on binding of GR to its response element. Our results suggest that GR, but not NF1, is able to target the nucleosome-disrupting activity of the SWI/SNF complex.

The TAF(II)250 subunit of TFIID has histone acetyltransferase activity

The transcription initiation factor TFIID is a multimeric protein complex composed of TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and many TBP-associated factors (TAF(II)s). TAF(II)s are important cofactors that mediate activated transcription by providing interaction sites for distinct activators. Here, we present evidence that human TAF(II)250 and its homologs in Drosophila and yeast have histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity in vitro. HAT activity maps to the central, most conserved portion of dTAF(II)230 and yTAF(II)130. The HAT activity of dTAF(II)230 resembles that of yeast and human GCN5 in that it is specific for histones H3 and H4 in vitro. Our findings suggest that targeted histone acetylation at specific promoters by TAF(II)250 may be involved in mechanisms by which TFIID gains access to transcriptionally repressed chromatin.

The translational placement of nucleosome cores in vitro determines the access of the transacting factor suGF1 to DNA

The sea urchin G-string binding factor (suGF1) is one of several proteins that bind sequence-specifically to oligo(dGxdC) motifs, frequently present upstream of eukaryotic genes. In this study we investigate the interaction of suGF1, purified to near homogeneity, with its oligo(dGxdC) binding site in a reconstituted nucleosome core in vitro. We show that the in vitro reconstitution of a 214 bp fragment containing a suGF1 binding site results in the appearance of five distinct nucleosome core species. These species contain the histone octamer in an identical rotational setting but in different translational frames. The resulting different nucleosomal locations of the suGF1 binding site in the five core species are shown to modulate the ability of suGF1 to bind to nucleosomal DNA, even though the rotational setting of the DNA in the nucleosome cores maximally exposes the suGF1 binding site. We propose that a direct protein-protein steric clash between suGF1 and the histone octamer is the most likely determinant in modulating the binding of suGF1 to its nucleosomally wrapped binding site. This result suggests that in vivo suGF1, like TBP, NF1 and heat shock factor, may require a complementary nucleosome disrupting activity or that suGF1 binds to free nascent replicated DNA prior to nucleosome deposition.

Nucleosome assembly on CTG triplet repeats

Expansion of CTG repeat sequences is associated with several human genetic diseases. We have examined the consequences of CTG repeat expansion for nucleosome assembly and positioning. Short CTG repeats are found within the most favored DNA sequences yet defined for nucleosome assembly. We find that as few as six CTG repeats will facilitate nucleosome assembly to a similar extent as the 50 or more repeats found in disease genes. Thus an increase in nucleosome stability on expansion of existing triplet repeats is unlikely to explain the acquisition of the disease phenotype. However, the CTG repeat sequence is efficiently wrapped around the histone octamer, preferring to associate with histones at the nucleosomal dyad. Thus short segments CTG repeat sequence will facilitate the assembly of a stable positioned nucleosome which might contribute to the expansion phenomenon and the functional organization of chromatin.